Decision E69-(p.134)
- Applicant
- Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Company
- Application Number
- 4527
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Company, 1969 (special drilling spacing unit Duhamel field)
- Date
- 1969
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Company, 1969 (special drilling spacing unit Duhamel field)
- Date
- 1969
- Applicant
- Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Company
- Application Number
- 4527
- Hearing Panel
- Strom NA
- Bellows LA
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Spacing
- Descriptors
- Drilling spacing unit
- Duhamel field
- Oil producing
- Nisku Fm
- Leduc Fm
- Target area
- Notes
- ERCB Examiners report on application No. 4527 by Michigan Wisconsin pipe line Company for the establishment of special drilling spacing unit for the production of oil from the Nisku and Leduc formations.
- Interveners
- Mobil Oil Canda, Ltd.
- Approval
- Denied
Less detail
Decision 81-09
- Applicant
- Panther Resources Ltd.
- Application Number
- 800651
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Panther Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas processing plant)
- Date
- 1981
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Panther Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas processing plant)
- Date
- 1981
- Applicant
- Panther Resources Ltd.
- Application Number
- 800651
- Hearing Panel
- Evans RG
- Pearson DG
- Remmer WG
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Duhamel field
- Gas processing plant
- Sour gas
- Acidification
- Air quality
- Economic analysis
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Flare
- Hydrogen sulphide removal
- Livestock
- Locating
- Monitoring
- NTS 83A
- Sulphur dioxide
- Sulphur recovery
- Water quality
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
- Notes
- ERCB Examiners report No. E81-9 on application No. 800651 to construct and operate a sour gas processing plant southwest of Camrose in LSD 5-31-45-20 W4M; Examiners' hearing 81-01-15 adjourned to 81-03-17/18/19
- Interveners
- City of Camrose
- County of Camrose No.22
- Cordes, K.
- Calvin, G.
- Noden, D.
- Luz, W.
- Klapstein, W.
- Sauer, J.
- Sauer, K.
- Weyhausen, H.
- Weyga Farming Ltd.
- Watterodt, T.
- Watterodt, W.
- Watterodt, M.
- Schroeder, D.
- Schroeder, K.
- Schroeder, P.
- Schroeder, H.
- Graefin Von Helldorf, V.
- Schroeser, I.
- Baumgarten, E.
- Braim, B.
- Krangnes, D.
- Snider, R.
- Tate, R.
Less detail
Decision E77-(p.176)
- Applicant
- Mobil Oil Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 770253
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Mobil Oil Canada Ltd., 1977 (gas processing Duhamel field)
- Date
- 1977
Decision E57-(P.081)
- Applicant
- Mobil Oil Canada Ltd.
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Mobil Oil Canada Ltd., 1957 (scheme to dispose of water by injection into Socony-Duhamel No. 20-3 well and Socony-Duhamel No. 29-15 well)
- Date
- 1957
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Mobil Oil Canada Ltd., 1957 (scheme to dispose of water by injection into Socony-Duhamel No. 20-3 well and Socony-Duhamel No. 29-15 well)
- Date
- 1957
- Applicant
- Mobil Oil Canada Ltd.
- Hearing Panel
- King RH
- MacLeod NA
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Water disposal
- Descriptors
- Duhamel field
- Water disposal
- Notes
- Examiners report on application by Mobil Oil of Canada Ltd. to dispose of water by injection into Socony-Duhamel No. 20-3 well and Socony-Duhamel No. 29-15 well.
Less detail
Decision E58-(p.167)
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Title
- Examiners report on inquiry into disposal of water at Mobil Oil Flint No. 1 battery, 1958
- Date
- 1958
- Title
- Examiners report on inquiry into disposal of water at Mobil Oil Flint No. 1 battery, 1958
- Date
- 1958
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Hearing Panel
- King RH
- Macleod NA
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Inquiry - Water disposal
- Descriptors
- Inquiry
- Water disposal
- Duhamel field
- Battery
- Notes
- Examiners report on inquiry into excessive water disposal at the Mobil Oil flint no.1 battery in January, 1958; examiners recommended prohibiting surface water disposal for a period of time equal to one and one half times the period it would take to dispose of the excessive barrels.
Less detail