Narrow Results By
Applicant
- Bonus Energy Limited 1
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency 2
- Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNRL) 1
- Capital Power GP Holding Incorporated 1
- Cardinal River Coals Ltd. 2
- Dover Operating Corp. 1
- EnCana Corporation 1
- Encana Corporation 1
- Epcor Generation Inc. 1
- Epcor Power Development Corpoaration 1
- Grand Rapids Pipeline GP Limited 2
- Petro-Canada 1
Decision 81-11
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1997
- Applicant
- Western Decalta Petroleum (1977) Limited.
- Application Number
- 800934
- Title
- Decision on application by Western Decalta Petroleum (1977) Limited, 1981 (reinstate well licence No. 85532 and 85632 - Rockyford area)
- Date
- 1981
- Title
- Decision on application by Western Decalta Petroleum (1977) Limited, 1981 (reinstate well licence No. 85532 and 85632 - Rockyford area)
- Date
- 1981
- Application Number
- 800934
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Bohme VE
- Bray JA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Rockyford field
- Well licence
- Agricultural land
- Environmental impact
- Geologic interpretation
- Locating
- NTS 82P
- Reservoir boundary
- Target area
- Wildlife
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.030
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.060
- Notes
- Decision 81-11 on application No. 800934 to reinstate well licences for wells Decalta et al Rockyford 6-25-26-23 & Decalta et al Rockyford 6-26-26-23 suspended by ERCB because applicant had not reached agreement with landowners (TP.26, R.22-23, W4M); Board hearing 1981-01-14 adjourned to 1981-02-26
- Interveners
- Kettenbach Farms and R.F. Kenworthy
- Miller, J.W.
- Location
- 06-25-026-23W4
- 06-26-026-23W4
Decision 88-16
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision149
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 880557
- Title
- Decision on application by Shell Canada Limited, 1988 (well licence Waterton field)
- Date
- 1988
- Title
- Decision on application by Shell Canada Limited, 1988 (well licence Waterton field)
- Date
- 1988
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 880557
- Hearing Panel
- Strom NA
- Mink FJ
- Fox EG
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Pincher Creek area
- Sour gas
- Waterton field
- Well licence
- Directional well
- Energy development
- Environment protection
- Environmental impact
- Gas well
- Gas producing
- Government policy
- Jurisdiction
- Land reclamation
- Land use
- Livingstone Fm
- Locating
- Mount Head Fm
- NTS 82H
- Public interest
- Recreational facility
- Regional planning
- Rundle Gp
- Waterton area
- Well site
- Whitney Creek area
- Wildlife management
- Legal References
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S2
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 6
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S4
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S14
- Notes
- Decision D88-16 on application No. 880557 to drill a well from surface in LSD 2-25-4-2 W5M to bottom hole location in 6-30-4-1 W5M to obtain gas production from the Mount Head and/or Livingstone formations; Board hearing 1988-06-15 adjourned to 1988-08-12/16/17/18/19
- Interveners
- Pincher Creek Chamber 0f Commerce
- Aris Instrument Services Limited
- Alberta Wilderness Association
- Diamond Hitch Outfitters
- Federation of Alberta Naturalists
- Public Advisory Committees to the Environment Council of Alberta
- National Audobon Society
- Wolf, R.E.
- Huntley, J.
- Tweedie, J.
- Dickie, K.
- Sheppard, D.H.
- Location
- 02-25-004-02W5
Decision 91-05
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision46
- Applicant
- TransAlta Utilities Corporation
- Application Number
- 910512
- Title
- Examiner report on application by TransAlta Utilities Corporation, 1991 (240-KV transmission line facilities Sundance-Entwistle area)
- Date
- 1991
- Title
- Examiner report on application by TransAlta Utilities Corporation, 1991 (240-KV transmission line facilities Sundance-Entwistle area)
- Date
- 1991
- Applicant
- TransAlta Utilities Corporation
- Application Number
- 910512
- Hearing Panel
- Dilay JD
- Moloney JK
- Wilson JF
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Utilities
- Category
- Transmission line
- Descriptors
- Entwistle area
- Transmission line
- Biological effect
- Decision D1989-2
- Forecasting
- Health
- Land use
- Locating
- NTS 83G
- Recreational facility
- Right of way
- Route selection
- Transmission corridor
- Wildlife
- Legal References
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S12
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S16
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S18
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S20
- Notes
- ERCB Examiners report E91-5 on application No. 910512 to construct 22 km of double-circuit 240-KV transmission line from Sundance substation to the south Entwhistle substation and to alter the Sundance substation and to decommission the south Entwhistle substation but retaining the existing structures for transmission purposes.
- Interveners
- Fahlman, Dr. L.
- Oatway, R.
- Kuypers, W.
Decision 95-01
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2531
- Applicant
- Renaissance Energy Ltd.
- Application Number
- 940964
- 940965
- 940969
- Title
- Examiner report on application by Renaissance Energy Ltd., 1995 (applications for a well licence, related natural gas pipeline and review of a compressor station by Renaissance Energy Ltd. opposed by Karvonen Films Ltd.)
- Date
- 1995
- Title
- Examiner report on application by Renaissance Energy Ltd., 1995 (applications for a well licence, related natural gas pipeline and review of a compressor station by Renaissance Energy Ltd. opposed by Karvonen Films Ltd.)
- Date
- 1995
- Applicant
- Renaissance Energy Ltd.
- Application Number
- 940964
- 940965
- 940969
- Hearing Panel
- Nichol JR
- Purvis RA
- Dunn GC
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Well licence
- Gas producing
- Gas pipeline
- Compressor station
- Pipeline construction permit
- Colony Fm
- Nisku Fm
- Environmental impact
- Wildlife
- Noise (sound)
- Amisk field
- ID-94-04
- Notes
- ERCB Examiners report E95-1 on applications No. 940964 and 940965 by Renaissance Energy Ltd. for a well licence (Renaissance Figure Lake 7-33) and natural gas pipeline at sections 28, Township 64 Range 18 W4M (Amisk Lake area), and to review existing compressor station. Opposed by Karvonen Films Ltd. who produce nature film documentaries.
- Interveners
- Karvonen Films Ltd.
Decision 95-02
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2530
- Applicant
- Petro-Canada
- Application Number
- 940609
- 940610
- 940718
- 940918
- 940919
- 940920
- 940921
- 940922
- 940930
- Title
- Decision 95-02 : Petro-Canada : Application for a coalbed methane (CBM) project in the Battle Lake area
- Date
- 1995
- Title
- Decision 95-02 : Petro-Canada : Application for a coalbed methane (CBM) project in the Battle Lake area
- Date
- 1995
- Applicant
- Petro-Canada
- Application Number
- 940609
- 940610
- 940718
- 940918
- 940919
- 940920
- 940921
- 940922
- 940930
- Hearing Panel
- Prince JP
- Remmer WG
- Fox EG
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Coalbed methane
- Descriptors
- Coalbed methane
- Natural gas
- Battle Lake area
- Compressor station
- Well licence
- Pipeline
- Experimentation
- IL-91-11
- Public relations
- Land use
- Noise (sound)
- Wildlife
- Water disposal
- Groundwater
- Upper Mannville Fm
- NTS 83B
- Notes
- Decision on applications for a Coalbed Methane Project in the Battle Lake Area, to drill five wells, produce gas from Upper Mannville Formation coals and operate a compressor station at Section 18 of Township 46, Range 1 W5M, and to construct 0.18 kilometres of pipeline to transmit sweet natural gas to a Nova lateral pipeline.
- Interveners
- Battle Lake Area Concerned Residents Group
- Alberg B
- Alberg K
- Bergen B
- Brunner D
- Dahler J
- Doze D
- Hyam A
- Hyam G
- Korving A
- Phippen J
- Reeves BOK
- Renschler A
- Riddett R
- Soderstrom L
- Wallis C
- Weyer KU
- Bauman R
- Dennehy C
- Lawson R
- Location
- 10-18-046-01W5
Decision 95-06
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2536
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 941438
- 941439
- Title
- Decision 95-06 : Shell Canada Limited : Application for a permit to construct sour natural gas pipeline and fuel gas pipeline in the Carbondale area
- Date
- 1995
- Title
- Decision 95-06 : Shell Canada Limited : Application for a permit to construct sour natural gas pipeline and fuel gas pipeline in the Carbondale area
- Date
- 1995
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 941438
- 941439
- Hearing Panel
- Prince JP
- Bietz BF
- Sharp KG
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Pipelines
- Descriptors
- Sour gas
- Fuel gas pipeline
- Pipeline construction permit
- Carbondale area
- Environmental impact
- Land use
- NTS 82H
- Wildlife
- Legal References
- Pipeline Act S7
- Notes
- Decision on applications to construct 30 km of steel pipeline to transport sour natural gas from three wells at Township 6 Range 3 W5 Meridian, to tie in to existing pipeline at Lsd 2-10-5-2 W5M. A fuel gas pipeline will also be constructed to transport fuel gas to the three wells, and will be laid alongside the sour gas pipeline.
- Interveners
- Federation of Alberta Naturalists
- Castle-Crown Wilderness
- Judd, M.
- Rocky Mountain Ecosystem Coalition
- Peigan Nation
- Approval
- Approved
- Location
- 02-10-005-02W5
Decision 97-08
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2854
- Applicant
- Cardinal River Coals Ltd.
- TransAlta Utilities Corporation
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
- Application Number
- 960313
- 960314
- 960677
- Title
- Decision 97-08: Cardinal River Coals Ltd. and TransAlta Utilities Corporation : Appplication for EUB-CEAA Joint Review Panel - Cheviot Coal Project, Mountain Park Area, Alberta : Report
- Date
- 1997
- Title
- Decision 97-08: Cardinal River Coals Ltd. and TransAlta Utilities Corporation : Appplication for EUB-CEAA Joint Review Panel - Cheviot Coal Project, Mountain Park Area, Alberta : Report
- Date
- 1997
- Applicant
- Cardinal River Coals Ltd.
- TransAlta Utilities Corporation
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
- Application Number
- 960313
- 960314
- 960677
- Hearing Type
- Joint
- Utilities
- Category
- Coal
- Descriptors
- Coal project
- Cheviot coal project
- Air pollution
- Air quality
- Biological effect
- Coal development policy for Alberta (1976)
- Coal mine
- Coal preparation plant
- Environmental impact
- Mountain Park area
- NTS 83C
- Open pit mining
- Physiological effect
- Socio-economic effect
- Soil pollution
- Transmission line
- Water pollution
- Water quality
- Wildlife
- Legal References
- Alberta Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S47
- Alberta Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S51
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S37
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S40
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S41
- Coal Conservation Act S10
- Coal Conservation Act S23
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S29
- EUB Rules of Practice
- Fisheries Act S35
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S12
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
- Notes
- EUB Decision D97-08 (report of the EUB-CEAA Joint Review Panel) on applications no. 960313, 960314, and 960677 by Cardinal River Coals and TransAlta Utilities Corporation for a proposed coal mine and coal processing plant (Cheviot Coal Project) and associated transmission line and substation (all in township 45-46, range 22-24, W5M); Joint Review Panel public hearing 1997-01-13 through 1997-02-20 and re-opened on 1997-04-01 for one day
- Interveners
- King MA
- Inland Cement
- Weldwood Canada
- Hinton and District Chamber of Commerce
- Alberta Chamber of Commerce
- United Mine Workers of America Local 1656
- Town of Hinton
- Van Binsbergen D
- Breitkreuz C
- Alexis First Nation
- Cadomin Environmental Protection Association
- Alpine Club of Canada
- Alberta Native Plant Council
- Mountain Park Environmental Protection and Heritage Association
- Alberta Wilderness Association
- Jasper Environmental Society
- Pembina Institute for Responsible Development
- Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society
- Gadd B
- Alberta Fish and Game Association
- Trout Unlimited
- Rocky Mountain Ecosystem Coalition
- Western Canada Wilderness Committee
- Smallboy Camp
- Dave family
- Clark JD
- Higgins B
- Approval
- Approved
- Conditions
- Section 35-45-24 W5M and SW quarter of Section 36-45-24 W5M (upper Prospect Creek) are excluded from application no. 960313
- Cardinal Rivers Coals (CRC) shall monitor aquatic ecology of Lac Des Roche
- CRC shall justify the need for each end lake pit and rock drain
- CRC shall carry out long term monitoring of groundwater and surface water quality
- CRC shall maintain 1000 m buffer between mine disturbance and the Cardinal Divide Natural Area wherever practical
- CRC shall monitor impacts on wildlife populations
- CRC shall establish permissable noise levels
- CRC shall establish community liaison groups, in particular with the Mountain Park Association, stewards of the Cardinal Divide Natural Area, the Alexis First Nation, and the Smallboy Camp
Decision 98-10
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2933
- Applicant
- Smoky River Coal Limited
- Application Number
- 970310
- 970311
- 970312
- Title
- Decision 98-10 : Smoky River Coal Limited : Application for amendment of Permit No. C97-13 and licenses for proposed no. 12 mine south B2 pit development
- Date
- 1998
- Title
- Decision 98-10 : Smoky River Coal Limited : Application for amendment of Permit No. C97-13 and licenses for proposed no. 12 mine south B2 pit development
- Date
- 1998
- Applicant
- Smoky River Coal Limited
- Application Number
- 970310
- 970311
- 970312
- Hearing Type
- Board
- No Hearing
- Category
- Coal
- Descriptors
- Caribou
- Coal mine
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Fisheries
- Grande Cache area
- Hydrogeology
- ID-94-04
- Land reclamation
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 83E
- NTS 83L
- Reclamation
- Surface mining
- Water quality
- Wildlife
- Legal References
- Coal Conservation Act
- Notes
- EUB Decision 98-10 on applications no. 970310, 970311 and 970312 by Smoky River Coal to amend Permit No. C97-13, granting authorization for a surface coal mine, for approval to extend its No. 12 Mine South mine site in the Grande Cache area; Under a coordinated process adopted by Alberta Environmental Protection (AEP) and the EUB, Smoky River filed a joint B2 Project Application / Environmental Impact Assessment report.
- No hearing
Decision 2000-59
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3281
- Applicant
- Cardinal River Coals Ltd.
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
- Application Number
- 960313
- 960314
- Title
- Decision on application by Cardinal River Coals Ltd., Cheviot Coal Project, 2000 (report of the EUB-CEAA Joint Review Panel - Cheviot Coal Project, Mountain Park Area, Alberta) (EUB Applications No. 960313 and 960314)
- Date
- 2000
- Title
- Decision on application by Cardinal River Coals Ltd., Cheviot Coal Project, 2000 (report of the EUB-CEAA Joint Review Panel - Cheviot Coal Project, Mountain Park Area, Alberta) (EUB Applications No. 960313 and 960314)
- Date
- 2000
- Application Number
- 960313
- 960314
- Hearing Panel
- Bietz BF
- Miller GJ
- Beck T
- Hearing Type
- Joint
- Utilities
- Category
- Coal
- Descriptors
- Air pollution
- Air quality
- Biological effect
- Cheviot Coal Project
- Coal development policy for Alberta (1976)
- Coal mining
- Coal preparation plant
- Ecological research
- Environmental impact
- Evaluation
- Indians of North America
- Mountain Park Area
- NTS 83C
- Open pit mining
- Physiological effect
- Road construction
- Socio-economic effect
- Soil pollution
- Transmission line
- Water pollution
- Water quality
- Wildlife
- Legal References
- Alberta Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S47
- Alberta Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S51
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S37
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S40
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S41
- Coal Conservation Act S10
- Coal Conservation Act S23
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S29
- EUB Rules of Practice
- Fisheries Act S35
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S12
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
- Notes
- Conclusions made in this report are supplemental to those made in the Panels' 1997 report, Decision 97-8 (Appendix 1) and include any new information obtained since the release of that report.
- Interveners
- Hinton and District Chamber of Commerce
- Gouthro B
- Dery M
- Carramusa R
- Mork C
- United Mine Workers of America, Local 1656 (UMWA)
- Campbell R
- Town of Hinton
- Risvold R
- Alberta Environment (AENV)
- Alberta Health and Wellness
- Macdonald W
- Cox D
- Smith K
- Stenhouse G
- Sterling G
- Notan L
- MacKenzie A
- Cadomin Environmental Protection Association (CEPA)
- Way C
- Government of Canada
- Linsey G
- Tupper R
- LeFebvre JG
- LaPalme L
- Fairbairn M
- Fenton W
- Gregoire P
- Holroyd G
- Hooper R
- Weaver J
- Bradford W
- Cardiff S
- Johnson D
- Dobson B
- Purves H
- Hodgins D
- Kirkland D
- Weldwood of Canada Ltd. (Weldwood)
- Udell R
- Stauffer R
- Lougheed H
- Alberta Wilderness Association, Jasper Environmental Society,
- Pembina Institute for Responsible Development, Canadian
- Parks and Wilderness Society, and Ben Gadd (AWA Coalition)
- Pachal D
- Gunsch S
- Gadd B
- Seaton J
- Notnes R
- Kittredge P
- Howery D
- Stellmach H
- Mountain Park Environmental Protection and
- Heritage Association
- Godby EA
- Bracko M
- Alpine Club of Canada/Alberta Native Plant Council (ACC/ANPC)
- Dinwoodie A
- Strang I
- Breitkreuz C
- Griffiths G
- Mountain Cree Camp
- Mountain Cree Camp Syllabics Institute
- Nadeau M
- Parry B
- Fedirchuk G
- Nielson R
- Budinski J
- Trout Unlimited Canada (TUC)
- Brewin K
- Alberta Fish and Game Association (AFGA)
- Alexis First Nation (AFN)
- Chief Francis Alexis
- Potts P
- Canadian Nature Federation (CNF)
- Environmental Resource Centre
- Clark J. D
- Mitchell J
- O’Chiese J
- Western Canada Wilderness Committee (WCWC)
- Phillips L
- Jones G
- Treaty 8 First Nations of Alberta (Treaty 8 FN)
- Rath J
- Handel J
- Panel Consultants:
- Ross W
- Peterson E
- Stephenson HG
- Panel Secretariat:
- Kennedy WY
- MacLachlan LJ
- Henderson DIR
- Seguin N
- Creasey R
- Powell R
- Thompson JP
- Roberts L
- Stoddart A
- Brown C
- Morris D
- Nixon V
- Approval
- Approved
- Conditions
- In addition to the original conditions, CRC shall: monitor selenium levels in the water of new end-pit lakes and assess adverse effects; schedule its rail and road construction after consulting with regional forestry and petroleum companies; conduct surveys for rare plant species on mine property; control mining impact on grizzly bears; protect historic archaeological sites; develop alternative to Mountain Park off-highway staging site; maintain regional environmental management initiatives.
Decision 2001-111
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3490
- Applicant
- Epcor Generation Inc.
- Epcor Power Development Corpoaration
- Application Number
- 2001173
- Title
- Decision 2001-111: EPCOR Generation Inc. and EPCOR Power Development Corporation expansion of Genesee power plant
- Date
- 2001
- Title
- Decision 2001-111: EPCOR Generation Inc. and EPCOR Power Development Corporation expansion of Genesee power plant
- Date
- 2001
- Application Number
- 2001173
- Hearing Panel
- McCrank MN
- Lock RG
- Miller GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Utilities
- Category
- Electric power
- Descriptors
- Electric power generation
- Genesee Power Plant
- Coal - fuel
- Thermal Power Plant
- Leduc area
- NTS 83G
- Decision D2001-33
- Decision D2001-101
- Environmental impact
- Safety
- Air pollution
- Fisheries
- Water pollution
- Wildlife
- Noise (sound)
- Health
- Human factor
- Socio-economic effect
- Cooling system
- Legal References
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S2
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S2
- Notes
- EUB Decision 2001-111 on application no. 2001173 by EPCOR Generation Inc. and EPCOR Power Development Corporation to construct a 490-megawatt expansion to its existing coal-fired Genesee power plant at Rge 25-50-3 W5M
- Interveners
- Alberta Environment
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
- Capital Health Authority
- Clean Energy Coalition
- Department of Fisheries and Oceans
- ENMAX Energy Corporation
- ENMAX Power Corporation
- Enron Canada Corporation
- Environment Canada
- ESBI Alberta Ltd.
- Fording Coal Limited
- Hebner Group
- Kruger Group (for the local area residents of Genesee)
- Mewassin Community Action Group
- Paul First Nation
- TransAlta Utilities Corporation
- TransCanada Energy Limited
- Anderson AM
- Bernette Ho L
- Bird T
- Bjorge R
- Blackall P
- Bodnarek R
- Bradford J
- Buchwald V
- Bull A
- Buss K
- Cheng L
- Chesterman D
- Cook S
- Cusano LA
- Dobko R
- Donahue W
- Fairbairn M
- Forster C
- Forster L
- Gagner E
- Gaspe D
- Good Striker D
- Griffiths M
- Hannaford DJ
- Hebner B
- Hebner D
- Hemstock RN
- Hnytka F
- Huber HR
- Kellerhals M
- Kruger D
- Lakeman B
- Lawrence L
- Lawrence S
- Legge A
- Lloyd D
- MacDonald B
- Mackenzie A
- Mak A
- Marr-Laing T
- McDonald K
- Paul D
- Phillips L
- Rain O
- Rain P
- Rain R
- Ross G
- Sawatsky N
- Secord RC
- Shores W
- Stepaniuk DW
- Stubbings
- Tyrell H
- Valupadas P
- Vincent M
- Wallace RB
- Yanor-McRae R
- Approval
- Approved
- Conditions
- The Board expects that EPCOR will adhere to all commitments it made during the consultation process, in the application, and at the hearing on such matters as mitigation, monitoring, and bilateral agreements.
- Location
- ##-25-050-03W5
Decision 2008-24
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4280
- Applicant
- Petro-Canada Oil Sands Inc.
- Application Number
- 1490956
- Title
- Decision 2008-024: Petro-Canada Oil Sands Inc. application to construct and operate the Sturgeon upgrader Sturgeon County
- Date
- 2008
- Title
- Decision 2008-024: Petro-Canada Oil Sands Inc. application to construct and operate the Sturgeon upgrader Sturgeon County
- Date
- 2008
- Applicant
- Petro-Canada Oil Sands Inc.
- Application Number
- 1490956
- Hearing Panel
- Dilay JD
- Miller GJ
- McManus BT
- Hearing Type
- Prehearing
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Environmental impact
- Groundwater
- Surface water
- Air quality
- Soil
- Vegetation
- Wildlife
- Noise reduction
- Health
- Safety
- Emergency response plan
- Economic analysis
- Socio-economic effect
- Sturgeon County
- Upgrading
- Oil sands
- Legal References
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S11
- Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act
- Water Act S36
- Water Act S37
- Water Act S49
- Water Act S50
- Interveners
- Alexander First Nations Industrial Relations Corporation (AFN IRC)
- Northeast Sturgeon County Industrial Landowners (NESCIL) and the Citizens for Responsible Development (CFRD)
- Shaw S
- Shaw K
- Statoil Hydro Canada
- Norh West Upgrading
- Suncor Energy Inc.
- S.V. Farms, S.V. Half Diamond Ranch, 267554 Alberta Ltd., and the J.Smulski Estate
- Hoehn R
- Total E&P Canada Ltd.
- Wright A
- Approval
- No approval required
- Location
- 00-19-056-21W4
- 00-02-056-21W4
- 00-03-056-21W4
- 00-10-056-21W4
- 00-11-056-21W4
- 00-12-056-21W4
- 00-13-056-21W4
- 00-14-056-21W4
- 00-15-056-21W4
- 00-22-056-21W4
- 00-23-056-21W4
- 00-24-056-21W4
- 00-25-056-21W4
- 00-26-056-21W4
- 00-27-056-21W4
Decision 2009-08
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4346
- Applicant
- Encana Corporation
- Application Number
- 1435831
- Title
- Decision 2009-08: Encana Corporation shallow gas infill development project Suffield National Wildlife Area, Alberta (ERCB application no. 1435831, CEAA reference no. 05-07-15620) report of the ERCB-CEAA joint review panel
- Date
- 2009
- Title
- Decision 2009-08: Encana Corporation shallow gas infill development project Suffield National Wildlife Area, Alberta (ERCB application no. 1435831, CEAA reference no. 05-07-15620) report of the ERCB-CEAA joint review panel
- Date
- 2009
- Applicant
- Encana Corporation
- Application Number
- 1435831
- Hearing Panel
- Connelly RG
- Ross B
- DeSorcy GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Joint
- Descriptors
- Reclamation
- Wildlife
- Vegetation
- Soil
- Wetland
- Water resource
- Renewable resource
- Noise reduction
- Air quality
- Health
- Climate
- Greenhouse effect
- Meteorology
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
- NTS 72L
- Shallow producing
- Suffield area
- Gas well
- Environmental impact
- Milk River FM
- Medicine Hat FM
- Second White Specks FM
- Conservation
- Legal References
- Canada Wildlife Act S2
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S35
- Wildlife Area Regulations S3
- Wildlife Area Regulations S4
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- EUB Rules of Practice S12
- Interveners
- Environmental Coalition
- Government of Canada
- Suffield Environmental Advisory Committee (SEAC)
- Sufrfield Industry Range Control (SIRC)
- Living World Nature Trust
- Kettenbach M
- Federation of Alberta Naturalists
- Longair Dr. R
- Trottier G
- Flint Energy
- Society of Grasslands Naturalists
- Cerpro Energy
- Gardner R
- Canadian Parks & Wilderness Society and Nature Saskatchewan
- Hagen D
- Ernst J
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Approved (partial)
- Location
- 11-28-015-06W4
- 13-28-015-06W4
- 15-28-015-06W4
Decision 2009-43
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4365
- Applicant
- Bonus Energy Limited
- Application Number
- 1576494
- Title
- Decision 2009-043 : Bonus Energy Limited application for a well licence Greencourt Field
- Date
- 2009
- Title
- Decision 2009-043 : Bonus Energy Limited application for a well licence Greencourt Field
- Date
- 2009
- Applicant
- Bonus Energy Limited
- Application Number
- 1576494
- Hearing Panel
- Miller GJ
- Willard RJ
- Tingley D
- Hearing Type
- Board
- No Hearing
- Category
- Well licence
- Legal References
- ERCB Rules of Practice S21
- Interveners
- Schmidt W
- Schmidt E
- Meunier W
- Meunier M
- Schmidt B
- Schmidt M
- Meunier K
- Approval
- Withdrawn
- Location
- 12-24-060-08W5
Decision 2009-51
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4375
- Applicant
- EnCana Corporation
- Application Number
- 1508544
- 1508545
- 1508547
- Title
- Decision 2009-051 : EnCana Corporation applications for three well licences Suffield Field
- Date
- 2009
- Title
- Decision 2009-051 : EnCana Corporation applications for three well licences Suffield Field
- Date
- 2009
- Applicant
- EnCana Corporation
- Application Number
- 1508544
- 1508545
- 1508547
- Hearing Panel
- McManus BT
- Gilmour J
- Warren WA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Written hearing
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Suffield Field
- NTS 72L
- Soil
- Vegetation
- Water
- Wetland
- Wildlife
- Conservation
- Reclamation
- Land use
- Well licence
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Interveners
- Department of National Defence (DND)
- AltaGas Holdings Incorporated
- Approval
- Approved
- Location
- 15-03-016-09W4
Decision 2011-05
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4445
- Applicant
- Total E&P Limited
- Application Number
- 1445535
- Title
- Decision 2011-005 : Total E&P Joslyn Ltd. application for an oil sands mine and bitumen processing facility Joslyn North mine project Fort McMurray area
- Date
- 2011
- Title
- Decision 2011-005 : Total E&P Joslyn Ltd. application for an oil sands mine and bitumen processing facility Joslyn North mine project Fort McMurray area
- Date
- 2011
- Applicant
- Total E&P Limited
- Application Number
- 1445535
- Hearing Panel
- Dilay JD
- Ross B
- McFadyen D
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Bitumen
- Oil sands
- Directive 074
- Environmental impact assessment
- Conservation
- Environmental impact
- Wildlife
- Vegetation
- Wetland
- Water
- Fish
- History
- Paleontology
- Land use
- Socio-economic effect
- Economic development
- Noise (sound)
- Reclamation
- Liability (law)
- Tailings - storage
- Settling pond
- Residential building
- Public consultation
- Cumulative impact assessment
- Legal References
- 2011 ABERCB 005
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S3
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S24
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S26
- Oil Sands Conservation Regulation
- Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act
- Water Act
- Energy Resources Conservation Act
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act
- Notes
- Report of the joint review panel established by the Federal Minister of the Environment and the Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Change to legal citation effective January 2011
- Interveners
- BP Canada Energy Company
- Shell Canada Limited
- Syncrude Canada Limited
- Belanger F member of the Dene Sioux First Nation
- Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo (RMWB)
- Oil Sands Environmental Coalition (OSEC)
- Mikisew Cree First Nation (MCFN)
- Fort McKay First Nation and Metis Nation Local #63 (Fort McKay)
- Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation (ACFN)
- Non-Status Fort McMurray Band Descendents, and Off-Reserve Fort McMurray Band Descendants
- Sierra Club Prairie
- Guertin M
- Clearwater River Band No. 175
- Government of Canada
- Government of Alberta
- Joint Review Panel (Panel) staff
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- Condition 1 – TOTAL will submit a detailed tailings management plan two years before commencement of operations, and TOTAL will clearly demonstrate its ability to meet all requirements of Directive 074. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 2 – TOTAL will devise methods for measuring fines at the project in accordance with Energy Resources Conservation Board requirements. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 3 – TOTAL will notify the Energy Resources Conservation Board in writing of any proposed pilot plants and/or demonstration plants for all technology development at least six months before construction of those facilities begins. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 4 – TOTAL will provide written updates of any previously submitted test reports by no later than February 28 each year, or as otherwise specified by the Energy Resources Conservation Board. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 5 – TOTAL will not exceed three million cubic metres of fluid in the sand beach area sumps. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 6 – One year prior to plant start-up, TOTAL will privide measurement plans to the Energy Resources Conservation Board for review and approval, including process and instrumentation diagrams, metering, sampling methods, analytical methods and, material balance procedures that satisfy Energy Resources Conservation Board measurement requirements. (Section 5.2.2) Condition 7 – TOTAL will not discharge any untreated froth treatment tailings to the tailings disposal area. (Section 5.3.2) Condition 8 – On an annual average basis, TOTAL will limit site-wide solvent losses to not more than four volumes per thousand volumes of bitumen production under any operating conditions. (Section 5.3.2) Condition 9 – On an annual average basis, TOTAL will limit the amount of asphaltene rejection to 10 mass per cent based on bitumen production. (Section 5.4.2) Condition 10 – TOTAL will submit detailed geotechnical designs for all external overburden disposal areas and reclamation stockpiles to the Energy Resources Conservation Board at least six months prior to conducting any field preparation in these areas. (Section 5.5.3) Condition 11 – TOTAL will submit to the Energy Resources Conservation Board, for its review and approval, detailed geotechnical designs and setback distances for critical infrastructure two years prior to site preparation activities for the ore preparation plant pit, the west and southern final pitwall, and for the final pitwall design and assessed setback from the Ells River. (Section 5.5.3) Condition 12 – TOTAL will provide Alberta Environment with a wildlife mitigation plan for approval prior to clearing any vegetation. The plan must achieve no net significant adverse effect on species at risk and deal with mitigating impacts to not only species at risk, but also valued wildlife. (Section 6.1.3) Condition 13 – TOTAL will monitor noise levels at James Grandejambe’s cabin. Should noise levels exceed those outlined in Directive 038, TOTAL will ensure that mitigation measures are implemented and that Directive 038 compliance is met. (Section 9.6.3) Condition 14 – TOTAL will maintain unimpeded access required for stakeholders to areas west of the project until the Moose Lake access management plan, or an equivalent, is implemented. (Section 9.7.3) Condition 15 – TOTAL will actively support and participate in the Cumulative Environmental Management Association and other regional committees to develop and use its strategies to mitigate both development and regional cumulative environmental effects. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 16 – TOTAL will limit the area of disturbance to 5000 hectares or less. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 17 – TOTAL will remove all benching on mine discard structures prior to reclaiming them. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 18 – TOTAL will provide sustainable watershed designs with vegetated watercourses for geotechnical design applications for mine discard structures. Landform watershed designs should be consistent with regionally recognized guidelines for the purpose of erosion management. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 19 – TOTAL will provide an amended mine plan to demonstrate an integrated landform and landscape design for the Canadian Natural Resources Limited – TOTAL common mine boundary to the Energy Resources Conservation Board for approval five years prior to development. The amended plan must include a discussion of the feasibility of filling the trench area between the Joslyn North and Horizon projects with mine discard. The plan must also include a discussion of the alternatives considered by TOTAL. (Section 10.2.3) Condition 20 – TOTAL will submit an annual report to the Energy Resources Conservation Board, starting two years prior to commencing mining operations, that describes its end pit lake research and development efforts for the previous year, and the current plans and timelines for determining the efficacy of its end pit lake within seven years of mine closure. This report will include all of TOTAL’s efforts and contributions with respect to collaboration on the demonstration of a full scale end pit lake. (Section 12.3)
Decision 2011-07
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4447
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 1614134
- 1614144
- 1614145
- 1614198
- 1614210
- Title
- Decision 2011-007 : Shell Canada Limited applications for well, facility, and pipelines licences Waterton Field
- Date
- 2011
- Title
- Decision 2011-007 : Shell Canada Limited applications for well, facility, and pipelines licences Waterton Field
- Date
- 2011
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 1614134
- 1614144
- 1614145
- 1614198
- 1614210
- Hearing Panel
- Bruni MJ
- Watson TL
- McManus BT
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Pipelines
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Waterton Field
- NTS 82G
- Well licence
- Pipeline licence
- Facility licence
- Directive 071
- Directive 060
- Directive 056
- Natural gas
- Hydrogen sulphide
- Risk
- Corrosion control
- Carbondale area
- Environmental impact
- Mississippian FM
- Rundle FM
- Emergency response plan
- Vegetation
- Wildlife
- Sulphur dioxide
- Legal References
- Energy Resources Conservation Act
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.002(1)
- Pipeline Act Part 4
- 2011 ABERCB 007
- Notes
- Change to legal citation effective January 2011
- Interveners
- Castle-Crown Wilderness Coalition
- Sheppard-Barbero group
- Orich-Fisher group
- Judd-Latham group
- McDowall S
- Healy H
- Crowshoe E
- Plain Eagle M
- Smith F
- Yellow Wings W
- Little Wolf M
- Small Legs E
- Ryan W
- Laskin D
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- The Board understands the frustration of residents about the time they spend dealing with matters arising from oil and gas development in the area; therefore, the Board advises that it will look to the quality of outcomes and not the quantity of consultation as a demonstration of success.
- The Board directs Shell to conduct a drilling and completions ERP exercise prior to spudding the WT68 well and to involve interested stakeholders in the development and implementation of and follow-up to that exercise.
- The Board directs Shell to control dust on the Seven Gates Road by watering the road as required based on the weather, road use, and road condition during drilling and completion of the well.
- The Board directs Shell to have a traffic monitor close to the junction of Seven Gates Road and Highway 507 during drilling and completions of the well.
- The ERCB directs that if Shell needs to test the well, the operational plans for this test, either in-line or by flaring, must be submitted to the ERCB for approval.
- Location
- 10-01-006-03W5
- 06-12-006-03W5
Decision 2011-19
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4457
- Applicant
- Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNRL)
- Application Number
- 1629922
- 1629923
- 1629924
- 1629926
- 1629927
- 1629929
- 1629930
- 1629931
- 1629933
- 1629934
- 1629935
- 1629936
- 1629938
- 1648948
- 1648949
- 1634352
- Title
- Decision 2011-019 : Canadian Natural Resources Limited applications for 15 well and 8 facility licences Sugden Field
- Date
- 2011
- Title
- Decision 2011-019 : Canadian Natural Resources Limited applications for 15 well and 8 facility licences Sugden Field
- Date
- 2011
- Application Number
- 1629922
- 1629923
- 1629924
- 1629926
- 1629927
- 1629929
- 1629930
- 1629931
- 1629933
- 1629934
- 1629935
- 1629936
- 1629938
- 1648948
- 1648949
- 1634352
- Hearing Panel
- Eynon G
- McManus RC
- Gilmour J
- Hearing Type
- Written hearing
- Category
- Pipelines
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Sugden Field
- NTS 73L
- Well licence
- Facility licence
- Directive 008
- Directive 009
- Directive 051
- Directive 056
- Directive 019
- Environmental impact
- Socio-economic effect
- Groundwater
- Surface water
- Water conservation
- Odor
- Emission
- Wildlife
- Evaluation
- Compliance
- Consultation
- Traffic survey
- Sparky FM
- Mannville GP
- Colorado GP
- Cold Lake area
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
- 2011 ABERCB 019
- Notes
- Amendment issued 13 September 2011
- Change to legal citation effective January 2011
- Interveners
- Minnie Lake Conservation Society
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- The panel instructs CNRL to
- set surface casing for all wells at an elevation no shallower than 440 m above mean sea level,
- conduct cement evaluation logs of the surface casing in each well after drilling to total depth and provide them to the Board for review and approval after setting the production casing,
- run cement evaluation logs of the production casing in each well and provide them to the Board for review and approval before perforating the wells, and
- refrain from conducting drilling operations, with the exception of well site construction operations, from June 1 until after September 5 (Labour Day).
- CNRL committed to
- complete a minimum of two bottoms-up circulations to ensure that the hole is clean,
- conduct wiper trips using a stabilizer blade assembly to ensure that the hole is properly cleaned of drilling mud and cuttings and has sufficient filter cake to protect the shallow aquifers or permeable zones, minimizing the potential for bridging-off or loss of circulation,
- use semirigid centralizers on every collar on both casing strings,
- use a minimum of 6 m3 of good cement returns prior to displacement of the cement from the inside of the casing string with a wiper plug,
- perform gas migration and surface casing vent flow tests within 90 days of rig release to confirm its procedures will successfully provide hydraulic isolation, and
- promptly address concerns with odours, through either its own internal processes or external partners such as LICA, where appropriate.
- Location
- 15-10-061-08W4
- 13-10-061-08W4
- 08-15-061-08W4
- 15-22-061-08W4
- 10-16-061-08W4
- 07-22-061-08W4
- 15-15-061-08W4
- 13-15-061-08W4
- 09-15-060-04W4
Decision 2013-14
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4511
- Applicant
- Dover Operating Corp.
- Application Number
- 1673682
- Title
- Decision 2013-014 : Dover Operating Corp.: Application for bitumen recovery scheme Athabasca oil sands area
- Date
- 2013
- Title
- Decision 2013-014 : Dover Operating Corp.: Application for bitumen recovery scheme Athabasca oil sands area
- Date
- 2013
- Applicant
- Dover Operating Corp.
- Application Number
- 1673682
- Hearing Panel
- Engen TC
- McManus RC
- Eynon G
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Land use
- Gas/Bitumen
- Sulphur
- Descriptors
- Law and legislation
- Oil Sands Conservation Act
- Oil sands
- Environment protection - citizen participation
- Environment protection - Law and Legislation
- Recovery
- Environmental impact assessment
- Wildlife
- Athabasca area
- Reclamation
- Sulphur recovery
- Emission
- Air quality
- Land use
- Economic analysis
- Transportation
- Development
- Legal References
- Responsible Energy Development Act (REDA)
- Energy Resources Conservation Act
- Oil Sands Conservation Act
- Transition Regulation
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S3
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S10(3)
- REDA General Regulation D3
- Responsible Energy Development Act (REDA) D15
- Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S53
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S10
- Water Act
- Constitution Act S91(24)
- Indian Act
- Natural Resources Transfer Agreement
- Administrative Procedures and Jurisdiction Act S12
- Responsible Energy Development Act (REDA) D2
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S3
- Decision Makers Regulation
- Responsible Energy Development Act D20
- Responsible Energy Development Act D21
- Alberta Land Stewardship Act
- Notes
- Change to legal citation effective January 2011
- Dover Operating Corp. has changed its name to Brion Energy Corporation.
- Interveners
- Fort McKay First Nation
- Fort McKay Metis Community Association
- Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- Conditions generally are requirements in addition to or otherwise expanding upon existing regulations and guidelines. An applicant must comply with conditions or it is in breach of its approval and subject to enforcement action by the AER. Enforcement of an approval includes enforcement of the conditions attached to that licence. Sanctions imposed for the breach of such conditions can include the suspension of the approval, resulting in the shut-in of a facility. The conditions imposed on the licence are summarized below. The Panel notes that Dover has made certain promises and commitments (collectively referred to as commitments) to parties involving activities or operations that are not strictly required under AER requirements. These commitments are separate arrangements between the parties and do not constitute conditions of the AER’s approval of the application. The commitments that have been given some weight by the Panel are summarized below. The Panel expects the applicant to comply with commitments made to all parties. However, while the Panel has considered these commitments in arriving at its decision, the Panel cannot enforce them. If the applicant does not comply with commitments made, affected parties can request a review of the original approval. At that time, the AER will assess whether the circumstances of any failed commitment warrant a review of the original approval. CONDITIONS The Panel notes the following commitments made by Dover, which the Panel has decided to make conditions of the approval [see paragraph 131]:
- Plant-wide fugitive emissions will be identified and controlled using the protocol recommended by the Environmental Code of Practice for the Measurement and Control of Fugitive Emissions from Equipment Leaks (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, 1993).
- A leak detection and repair system will be implemented.
- A program will be developed and implemented to detect and repair leaks, and that program must meet or exceed the CAPP Best Management Practice for Fugitive Emissions Management.
- A low oxides of nitrogen emissions technology will be selected as required by the Alberta Interim Emission Guidelines for Oxides of Nitrogen for New Boilers, Heaters and Turbines using Gaseous Fuels for the Oil Sands Region (Alberta Environment, 2007).
- VRU will be used to reduce hydrocarbon emissions.
- There will be no continuous flaring other than of pilot and purge gas.
- Odour indicator species will be continuously monitored.
- A protocol must developed for responding to odours, including investigating the source of the odour, notifying communities near the Project, addressing the odour source, and monitoring to verify that the source of the odour has been addressed. The Panel also requires the following:
- Dover must provide a plan to mitigate SO2 emissions and meet AER Interim Directive 2001-03 on a project-wide basis. The plan must be submitted to the AER for review. [See paragraph 129.]
- The scheme approval must include directional and motion-sensitive lighting at the plant sites, well pads, and associated facilities. [See paragraph 137.] COMMITMENTS BY DOVER
- Dover committed to a coordinated approach to wildlife monitoring in the region and to a deer and wolf management program in collaboration with ESRD and other in situ operators. To reduce effects on caribou habitat, Dover proposed on-site mitigations that reflect standard industry practices, as well as an off-site caribou habitat enhancement program. [See paragraph 72.]
- Dover indicated that it would manage access to its Project at a gate located about 30 km southwest of Fort McKay IR174. Dover noted that there will be control gates at each of its processing plants, but that these plant sites are only small areas of the Project. Dover also committed to restricting access to its operations and prohibiting workers residing in its camp from using all-terrain vehicles for recreational use while on site. [See paragraph 84.]
- Dover committed to accommodating Fort McKay members who wish to access their traditional lands through the Project area. [See paragraph 150.]
- Location
- 00-00-093-16W4
- 00-00-094-17W4
- 00-00-095-17W4
- 00-13-092-15W4
Decision 2013-17
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4515
- Applicant
- Tech Resources Limited
- Application Number
- 1749543
- 1749567
- 1749568
- 1749569
- 1749570
- 1749572
- 1749605
- 1749607
- 1749620
- 1751999
- 1752756
- 1763318
- 1763325
- 1763326
- 1763327
- Title
- Decision 2013-017 : Teck Resources Ltd. application for oil sands evaluation well licences undefined field
- Date
- 2013
- Title
- Decision 2013-017 : Teck Resources Ltd. application for oil sands evaluation well licences undefined field
- Date
- 2013
- Applicant
- Tech Resources Limited
- Application Number
- 1749543
- 1749567
- 1749568
- 1749569
- 1749570
- 1749572
- 1749605
- 1749607
- 1749620
- 1751999
- 1752756
- 1763318
- 1763325
- 1763326
- 1763327
- Hearing Panel
- McManus RC
- Bolton AH
- McNeil B
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Evaluation
- Bitumen
- Fort Chipewyan area
- Coring
- Land use
- Water quality
- Athabasca River area
- Athabasca River Delta
- Wildlife
- Animal migration
- Native land claims
- Public interest
- Oil Sands
- McMurray FM
- Fort Mackay area
- Well
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.030
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S4
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S3
- Responsible Energy Development Act (REDA) D15
- 2013 ABAER 017
- Notes
- Change to legal citation effective January 2011
- Interveners
- Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation (ACFN)
- Mikisew Cree First Nation (MCFN)
- Fort Chipewyan Métis Local 125 (FCM)
- Clark G
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- SUMMARY OF CONDITIONS AND COMMITMENTS Conditions generally are requirements in addition to or otherwise expanding upon existing regulations and guidelines. An applicant must comply with conditions or it is in breach of its approval and subject to enforcement action by the AER. Enforcement of an approval includes enforcement of the conditions attached to that licence. Sanctions imposed for the breach of such conditions may include the suspension of the approval, resulting in the shut-in of a facility. The conditions imposed on the licence are summarized below. Undertakings, promises, and commitments (collectively referred to as commitments) to parties involving activities or operations that are not strictly required under AER requirements. These commitments are separate arrangements between the parties and do not constitute conditions of the AER’s approval of the applications. The commitments that have been given some weight by the AER are summarized below. The AER expects the applicant to comply with commitments made to all parties. However, while the AER has considered these commitments in arriving at its decision, the AER cannot enforce them. If the applicant does not comply with commitments made, affected parties may request a review of the original approval. At that time, the AER will assess whether the circumstances regarding any failed commitment warrant a review of the original approval.
- COMMITMENTS BY TECK Teck committed to providing FCM with Directive 056 notification at the same time it provides notification to other Fort Chipewyan-based First Nations in the future.
Decision 2014-09
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4528
- Applicant
- Capital Power GP Holding Incorporated
- Application Number
- 1703019
- 1780894
- 007-10404 (EPEA)
- 16576 (WA)
- 00210925 (WA)
- Title
- Decision 2014-009 : Capital Power GP Holding Inc. application for Genesee mine expansion project Wetaskiwin coalfield
- Date
- 2014
- Title
- Decision 2014-009 : Capital Power GP Holding Inc. application for Genesee mine expansion project Wetaskiwin coalfield
- Date
- 2014
- Applicant
- Capital Power GP Holding Incorporated
- Application Number
- 1703019
- 1780894
- 007-10404 (EPEA)
- 16576 (WA)
- 00210925 (WA)
- Hearing Panel
- McManus RC
- Hearing Type
- Board
- No Hearing
- Category
- Coal
- Descriptors
- Genesee mine
- Edmonton area
- Warburg area
- Expansion
- NTS 83g
- Dispute resolution
- Surface mining
- Surface water
- Groundwater
- Reclamation
- Wildlife
- Legal References
- Coal Conservation Act Part 4
- Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act Part 2
- Water Act S37
- Water Act S50
- Notes
- Change to legal citation effective January 2011
- Approval
- No approval required
- Location
- xx-03-050-02W5
- xx-04-050-02W5
- xx-05-050-02W5
- xx-06-050-02W5
- xx-07-050-02W5
- xx-08-050-02W5
- xx-09-050-02W5
- xx-10-050-02W5
- xx-11-050-02W5
- xx-14-050-02W5
- xx-08-050-03W5
- xx-09-050-03W5
- xx-10-050-03W5
- xx-11-050-03W5
- xx-17-050-03W5
- xx-18-050-03W5
- xx-19-050-03W5
- xx-20-050-03W5