9 records – page 1 of 1.

Decision 2002-89|2002-89 Addendum

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3548
Applicant
TrueNorth Energy Corporation
Application Number
1096587
2001202
Title
Decision 2002-89: TrueNorth Energy Corporation application to construct and operate an oil sands mine and cogeneration plant in the Fort McMurray area (and addendum)
Date
2002
Title
Decision 2002-89: TrueNorth Energy Corporation application to construct and operate an oil sands mine and cogeneration plant in the Fort McMurray area (and addendum)
Date
2002
Applicant
TrueNorth Energy Corporation
Application Number
1096587
2001202
Hearing Panel
McCrank MN
McGee TM
Nichol JR
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cogeneration
Cumulative impact assessment
Electric power plant
Fort Hills Oil Sands Project
Fort McMurray Area
NTS 83H
Oil sands
Electric substation
Tailings
Water quality
Wetland
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S15
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Oil Sands Conservation Act S11
Notes
EUB Decision on application no. 1096587 pursuant to the Oil Sands Conservation Act for an oil sands mine and bitumen extraction facility located 90 km north of Fort McMurray in Townships 96 and 97, Ranges 9 to 11, West of 4th meridian. Project designed to extract 30 000 m^3 of bitumen/day. Application no. 2001202 under the Hydro and Electric Energy Act for an electric power plant consisting of two 80-MW gas turbine generators and a transmission substation.
Reasons for decision on substation deferred.
Addendum to Decision released October 30, 2002 (attached)
Interveners
Boyd M
Campre A
Campre T
Chabaylo R
Cheng L
Coutu P
Dort-MacLean A
Flexer W
Flobert J
George R
Hoffman Mercredi L
Horton D
Kitagawa M
MacCrimmon G
MacKenzie A
Ng C
Nicholson A
Norton L
Oakes E
Robillard Jones E
Robinson R
Sauve M
Scanie H
Severson-Baker C
St. Jean N
Thomas R
Woodward R
Woynillowicz D
Alberta Council of the Canadian Federation of University Women
Alberta Wilderness Association
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
Cree Burn Lake Preservation Society
Department of Justice Canada
Fort McKay First Nation
Fort McMurray Medical Staff Association
Government of Alberta Minister of Environment
Government of Alberta Minister of Health and Wellness
Government of Alberta Minister of Sustainable Resource Development
Metis Local Number 122
Oil Sands Environmental Coalition
Shell Canada Limited
Suncor Energy Inc.
Syncrude Canada Limited
Wood Buffalo First Nations
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
SUMMARY OF CONDITIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Conditions of Board Approval Recommendations to Alberta
Less detail

Decision 2009-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4346
Applicant
Encana Corporation
Application Number
1435831
Title
Decision 2009-08: Encana Corporation shallow gas infill development project Suffield National Wildlife Area, Alberta (ERCB application no. 1435831, CEAA reference no. 05-07-15620) report of the ERCB-CEAA joint review panel
Date
2009
Title
Decision 2009-08: Encana Corporation shallow gas infill development project Suffield National Wildlife Area, Alberta (ERCB application no. 1435831, CEAA reference no. 05-07-15620) report of the ERCB-CEAA joint review panel
Date
2009
Applicant
Encana Corporation
Application Number
1435831
Hearing Panel
Connelly RG
Ross B
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Joint
Descriptors
Reclamation
Wildlife
Vegetation
Soil
Wetland
Water resource
Renewable resource
Noise reduction
Air quality
Health
Climate
Greenhouse effect
Meteorology
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
NTS 72L
Shallow producing
Suffield area
Gas well
Environmental impact
Milk River FM
Medicine Hat FM
Second White Specks FM
Conservation
Legal References
Canada Wildlife Act S2
Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S35
Wildlife Area Regulations S3
Wildlife Area Regulations S4
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
EUB Rules of Practice S12
Interveners
Environmental Coalition
Government of Canada
Suffield Environmental Advisory Committee (SEAC)
Sufrfield Industry Range Control (SIRC)
Living World Nature Trust
Kettenbach M
Federation of Alberta Naturalists
Longair Dr. R
Trottier G
Flint Energy
Society of Grasslands Naturalists
Cerpro Energy
Gardner R
Canadian Parks & Wilderness Society and Nature Saskatchewan
Hagen D
Ernst J
Approval
Approved with conditions
Approved (partial)
Location
11-28-015-06W4
13-28-015-06W4
15-28-015-06W4
Less detail

Decision 2009-51

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4375
Applicant
EnCana Corporation
Application Number
1508544
1508545
1508547
Title
Decision 2009-051 : EnCana Corporation applications for three well licences Suffield Field
Date
2009
Title
Decision 2009-051 : EnCana Corporation applications for three well licences Suffield Field
Date
2009
Applicant
EnCana Corporation
Application Number
1508544
1508545
1508547
Hearing Panel
McManus BT
Gilmour J
Warren WA
Hearing Type
Board
Written hearing
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Suffield Field
NTS 72L
Soil
Vegetation
Water
Wetland
Wildlife
Conservation
Reclamation
Land use
Well licence
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Interveners
Department of National Defence (DND)
AltaGas Holdings Incorporated
Approval
Approved
Location
15-03-016-09W4
Less detail

Decision 2010-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4407
Applicant
Altagas Limited
Application Number
1609170
1620466
Title
Decision 2010-008 : Altagas Ltd. applications for a new pipeline licence and a pipeline abandonment Norris Field
Date
2010
Title
Decision 2010-008 : Altagas Ltd. applications for a new pipeline licence and a pipeline abandonment Norris Field
Date
2010
Applicant
Altagas Limited
Application Number
1609170
1620466
Hearing Panel
McManus BT
Hearing Type
Board
No Hearing
Category
Well licence
Pipelines
Descriptors
NTS 83H
Ethylene homopolymer
Steel pipe
Orphan pipeline
Wetland
Hydrogen sulphide
Salt water
Well licence
Pipeline
Pipeline licence
Legal References
ERCB Rules of Practice S21
Pipeline Act Part 4
Interveners
Smyth J
Smyth M
Approval
Withdrawn
Location
09-29-053-18W4
Less detail

Decision 2010-27

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4427
Applicant
West Energy Limited
Application Number
1623557
Title
Decision 2010-027 : West Energy Ltd. application for a well licence Pembina Field
Date
2010
Title
Decision 2010-027 : West Energy Ltd. application for a well licence Pembina Field
Date
2010
Applicant
West Energy Limited
Application Number
1623557
Hearing Panel
Miller GJ
McManus BT
Willard RJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Pembina Field
NTS 83G
Directive 056
Well licence
Pollution
Environment
Hydrogen sulphide
Directional well
Health
Safety
Natural area
Gas flaring
Emergency response plan
Well classification
Wetland
Compensation
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Interveners
Logan J
Logan B
Kerpan C
Losey Dr. TC
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
APPENDIX 2 SUMMARY OF CONDITIONS AND COMMITMENTS Conditions generally are requirements in addition to or otherwise expanding upon existing regulations and guidelines. An applicant must comply with conditions or it is in breach of its approval and subject to enforcement action by the ERCB. Enforcement of an approval includes enforcement of the conditions attached to that licence. Sanctions imposed for the breach of such conditions may include the suspension of the approval, resulting in the shut-in of a facility. The conditions imposed on the licence are summarized below. The Board notes that West has made certain undertakings, promises, and commitments (collectively referred to as commitments) to parties involving activities or operations that are not strictly required under ERCB requirements. These commitments are separate arrangements between the parties and do not constitute conditions to the ERCB’s approval of the application. The commitments that have been given some weight by the Board are summarized below. The Board expects the applicant to comply with commitments made to all parties. However, while the Board has considered these commitments in arriving at its decision, the Board cannot enforce them. If the applicant does not comply with commitments made, affected parties may request a review of the original approval. At that time, the ERCB will assess whether the circumstances regarding any failed commitment warrant a review of the original approval. CONDITIONS
The Board directs West to submit a complete and detailed drilling plan for Board approval prior to drilling.
The Board directs West to delineate the boundaries of the wetland within 100 m of the lease, identify a more appropriate location for soil storage, and submit a revised survey plan that shows avoidance of any activity or placement of any materials in the wetland area.
The Board directs West to conduct all precritical sour notifications and meetings associated with critical wells prior to drilling into the Nisku Formation. The Board will require that a field inspector from the ERCB attend the ERP review meeting. COMMITMENTS BY WEST ENERGY LTD.
To drill, complete, and test the well as if it were a critical well.
To meet with the Logans to gain all the information relevant to the ERP.
To minimize flaring during completions and testing.
To suspend operations when technically possible and safe to do so during normal sour operations if an egress road inside the EPZ becomes impassable due to weather.
To advise the Logans of the actual H2S content of the well if it is successful.
To place an air monitor on the Logans’ property, if requested, during drilling, completions, and testing of the well.
To include the Logans, if requested, in the completion and testing ERP.
To ground truth the Modeste Creek Natural Area before the well is drilled. To locate and mark out main trails using GPS and to update its maps. To provide copies of the updated map to the Logans, the Board, and the Modeste Creek Valley Watershed Society.
Location
11-32-049-05W5
Less detail

Decision 2011-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4445
Applicant
Total E&P Limited
Application Number
1445535
Title
Decision 2011-005 : Total E&P Joslyn Ltd. application for an oil sands mine and bitumen processing facility Joslyn North mine project Fort McMurray area
Date
2011
Title
Decision 2011-005 : Total E&P Joslyn Ltd. application for an oil sands mine and bitumen processing facility Joslyn North mine project Fort McMurray area
Date
2011
Applicant
Total E&P Limited
Application Number
1445535
Hearing Panel
Dilay JD
Ross B
McFadyen D
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Oil sands oil recovery
Bitumen
Oil sands
Directive 074
Environmental impact assessment
Conservation
Environmental impact
Wildlife
Vegetation
Wetland
Water
Fish
History
Paleontology
Land use
Socio-economic effect
Economic development
Noise (sound)
Reclamation
Liability (law)
Tailings - storage
Settling pond
Residential building
Public consultation
Cumulative impact assessment
Legal References
2011 ABERCB 005
Oil Sands Conservation Act S3
Oil Sands Conservation Act S24
Oil Sands Conservation Act S26
Oil Sands Conservation Regulation
Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act
Water Act
Energy Resources Conservation Act
Canadian Environmental Assessment Act
Notes
Report of the joint review panel established by the Federal Minister of the Environment and the Energy Resources Conservation Board
Change to legal citation effective January 2011
Interveners
BP Canada Energy Company
Shell Canada Limited
Syncrude Canada Limited
Belanger F member of the Dene Sioux First Nation
Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo (RMWB)
Oil Sands Environmental Coalition (OSEC)
Mikisew Cree First Nation (MCFN)
Fort McKay First Nation and Metis Nation Local #63 (Fort McKay)
Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation (ACFN)
Non-Status Fort McMurray Band Descendents, and Off-Reserve Fort McMurray Band Descendants
Sierra Club Prairie
Guertin M
Clearwater River Band No. 175
Government of Canada
Government of Alberta
Joint Review Panel (Panel) staff
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
Condition 1 – TOTAL will submit a detailed tailings management plan two years before commencement of operations, and TOTAL will clearly demonstrate its ability to meet all requirements of Directive 074. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 2 – TOTAL will devise methods for measuring fines at the project in accordance with Energy Resources Conservation Board requirements. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 3 – TOTAL will notify the Energy Resources Conservation Board in writing of any proposed pilot plants and/or demonstration plants for all technology development at least six months before construction of those facilities begins. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 4 – TOTAL will provide written updates of any previously submitted test reports by no later than February 28 each year, or as otherwise specified by the Energy Resources Conservation Board. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 5 – TOTAL will not exceed three million cubic metres of fluid in the sand beach area sumps. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 6 – One year prior to plant start-up, TOTAL will privide measurement plans to the Energy Resources Conservation Board for review and approval, including process and instrumentation diagrams, metering, sampling methods, analytical methods and, material balance procedures that satisfy Energy Resources Conservation Board measurement requirements. (Section 5.2.2) Condition 7 – TOTAL will not discharge any untreated froth treatment tailings to the tailings disposal area. (Section 5.3.2) Condition 8 – On an annual average basis, TOTAL will limit site-wide solvent losses to not more than four volumes per thousand volumes of bitumen production under any operating conditions. (Section 5.3.2) Condition 9 – On an annual average basis, TOTAL will limit the amount of asphaltene rejection to 10 mass per cent based on bitumen production. (Section 5.4.2) Condition 10 – TOTAL will submit detailed geotechnical designs for all external overburden disposal areas and reclamation stockpiles to the Energy Resources Conservation Board at least six months prior to conducting any field preparation in these areas. (Section 5.5.3) Condition 11 – TOTAL will submit to the Energy Resources Conservation Board, for its review and approval, detailed geotechnical designs and setback distances for critical infrastructure two years prior to site preparation activities for the ore preparation plant pit, the west and southern final pitwall, and for the final pitwall design and assessed setback from the Ells River. (Section 5.5.3) Condition 12 – TOTAL will provide Alberta Environment with a wildlife mitigation plan for approval prior to clearing any vegetation. The plan must achieve no net significant adverse effect on species at risk and deal with mitigating impacts to not only species at risk, but also valued wildlife. (Section 6.1.3) Condition 13 – TOTAL will monitor noise levels at James Grandejambe’s cabin. Should noise levels exceed those outlined in Directive 038, TOTAL will ensure that mitigation measures are implemented and that Directive 038 compliance is met. (Section 9.6.3) Condition 14 – TOTAL will maintain unimpeded access required for stakeholders to areas west of the project until the Moose Lake access management plan, or an equivalent, is implemented. (Section 9.7.3) Condition 15 – TOTAL will actively support and participate in the Cumulative Environmental Management Association and other regional committees to develop and use its strategies to mitigate both development and regional cumulative environmental effects. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 16 – TOTAL will limit the area of disturbance to 5000 hectares or less. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 17 – TOTAL will remove all benching on mine discard structures prior to reclaiming them. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 18 – TOTAL will provide sustainable watershed designs with vegetated watercourses for geotechnical design applications for mine discard structures. Landform watershed designs should be consistent with regionally recognized guidelines for the purpose of erosion management. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 19 – TOTAL will provide an amended mine plan to demonstrate an integrated landform and landscape design for the Canadian Natural Resources Limited – TOTAL common mine boundary to the Energy Resources Conservation Board for approval five years prior to development. The amended plan must include a discussion of the feasibility of filling the trench area between the Joslyn North and Horizon projects with mine discard. The plan must also include a discussion of the alternatives considered by TOTAL. (Section 10.2.3) Condition 20 – TOTAL will submit an annual report to the Energy Resources Conservation Board, starting two years prior to commencing mining operations, that describes its end pit lake research and development efforts for the previous year, and the current plans and timelines for determining the efficacy of its end pit lake within seven years of mine closure. This report will include all of TOTAL’s efforts and contributions with respect to collaboration on the demonstration of a full scale end pit lake. (Section 12.3)
Less detail

Decision 2014-12

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4531
Applicant
Grand Rapids Pipeline GP Limited
Application Number
1771853
1771854
1771855
1771856
1771857
1771858
1771859
1773896
1788155
1788926
1793176
1803414
Title
Decision 2014-12 : Grand Rapids Pipeline GP Ltd applications for the Grand Rapids pipeline project
Date
2014
Title
Decision 2014-12 : Grand Rapids Pipeline GP Ltd applications for the Grand Rapids pipeline project
Date
2014
Applicant
Grand Rapids Pipeline GP Limited
Application Number
1771853
1771854
1771855
1771856
1771857
1771858
1771859
1773896
1788155
1788926
1793176
1803414
Hearing Panel
Bolton AH
McManus RC
Macken C
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Pipeline licence
Pipeline route
Site survey
Construction
Reclamation
Noise (sound)
Emission
Wetland
Migration
Contamination
Pollution
Wildlife
Spill
Ownership
Pipeline crossing
Land use
Industrial development
Agriculture
Emergency response plan
Consultation
Legal References
Public Lands Act
Pipeline Act
Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act
Responsible Energy Development Act (REDA) D21
Pipeline Rules
Notes
Change to legal citation effective January 2011
Interveners
Trenholm D
Cactus Holding Ltd.
Westways Contractors (1986) Ltd.
MEG Energy Corp.
McLeod Services & Contracting Ltd.
Fort Industrial Estates Ltd.
D & A Guenette Farms Ltd.
Athabasca Chipewyan First Nations (ACFN)
Laricina Energy Ltd.
Komant A
Komant N
Komant D
Pentelechuk N & Son Potato Growers
631913 Alberta Lrd.
Mitchel M
Mazurenko F
Approval
Approved with conditions
Less detail

Decision 2015-004

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4537
Applicant
Grand Rapids Pipeline GP Limited
Application Number
1771853
1771854
1771855
1771856
1771857
1771858
1771859
1773896
1788155
1788926
1793176
1803414
Title
Decision 2015-04 : Consideration of Grand Rapids' compliance with conditions 12 and 13 of Decision 2014-012
Date
2015
Title
Decision 2015-04 : Consideration of Grand Rapids' compliance with conditions 12 and 13 of Decision 2014-012
Date
2015
Applicant
Grand Rapids Pipeline GP Limited
Application Number
1771853
1771854
1771855
1771856
1771857
1771858
1771859
1773896
1788155
1788926
1793176
1803414
Hearing Panel
Bolton AH
McManus RC
Macken C
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Pipeline licence
Pipeline route
Site survey
Construction
Reclamation
Noise (sound)
Emission
Wetland
Migration
Contamination
Pollution
Wildlife
Spill
Ownership
Pipeline crossing
Land use
Industrial development
Agriculture
Emergency response plan
Consultation
Legal References
Public Lands Act
Pipeline Act
Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act
Responsible Energy Development Act (REDA) D21
Pipeline Rules
Notes
Change to legal citation effective January 2011
Interveners
D & A Guenette Farms Ltd.
Approval
Approved
Location
xx-02-055-21W4
Less detail

Decision 2018-002

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4557
Applicant
Bashaw Oil Corporation
Application Number
1842705
1851246
1851250
001-00400207
Title
Decision 2018-002 : Bashaw Oil Corporation applications for proximity critical sour wells Nisku Formation, Drayton Valley area
Date
2018
Title
Decision 2018-002 : Bashaw Oil Corporation applications for proximity critical sour wells Nisku Formation, Drayton Valley area
Date
2018
Applicant
Bashaw Oil Corporation
Application Number
1842705
1851246
1851250
001-00400207
Hearing Panel
Kennedy H
Zaitlin B
McKinnon C
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Gas producing
Gas well
Sour gas
Well licence
Well spacing
Nisku FM
Drayton Valley area
Emergency response plan
Hydrogen sulphide
Wetland
Legal References
Responsible Energy Development Act (REDA)
Responsible Energy Development Act (REDA) D15
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S4
Approval
Denied
Location
04-01-050-07W5
15-35-049-07W5
08-34-049-04W5
Less detail

9 records – page 1 of 1.