5 records – page 1 of 1.

Decision 83-04

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1968
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Title
Decision 83-04: Administration fee appeals 1982 and review of proposed revisions to the administration fee system
Date
1983
Title
Decision 83-04: Administration fee appeals 1982 and review of proposed revisions to the administration fee system
Date
1983
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Administration fee
Descriptors
Administration fee
Appellate procedure
Ownership
Well classification
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S51
Notes
Decision D83-4 ON 1982 administration fee appeals plus a review of the appeal system and revisions planned in 1983; appeal.
Less detail

Decision 84-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1969
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
830007
Title
Decision report 84-05: Lodgepole blowout Inquiry - phase 2: sour gas well blowouts in Alberta: their causes, and actions required to minimize their future occurrence
Date
1984
Title
Decision report 84-05: Lodgepole blowout Inquiry - phase 2: sour gas well blowouts in Alberta: their causes, and actions required to minimize their future occurrence
Date
1984
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
830007
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Inquiry - Blowout
Descriptors
Blowout (well)
Drilling (well)
Lodgepole blowout
Sour gas
Alberta
Blowout preventer
Cost analysis
Drilling problem
Emergency procedure
Inspecting
Insurance
Recommendation
Regulation
Safety
Training
Well classification
Notes
Decision D84-5 on phase 2 of proceeding No. 830007; see Decision No. D84-9 for phase 1 report
Interveners
F. G. Bercha and Associates Limited Confer Consulting Ltd. Shaw K. L. Energy Resources Conservation Board
Pembina Area Sour Gas Exposures Committee
Sams C.
Canadian Association of Oilwell Drilling Contractors
Canadian Petroleum Association
Independent Petroleum Association of Canada
Sabey D. 0.
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Dome Petroleum Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Petro-Canada Inc.
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Alberta Government Departments
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Bercha FG
Griffin BJ
Macdonald RI
Engbloom GM
Shaw KL
Remmer WG
May EF
McFarlane BE
Bissett KR
Whitelock C
Sams C
Grigg PC
Rath H
Parker IM
Maciej H
Elser WA
Farries JK
Sawotin WH
Lewis D
Reid R
Thomas RL
Strain HJ
Wichert A
Demosky LD
Belczewski DS
Smith FC
Wallace AE
McGrath RT
Brown KC
Roeske WE
Tilbe JR
Piaskoski J
Straub B
Murray AS
Less detail

Decision 84-28

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1690
Applicant
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Application Number
830495
Title
Decision on application by Canterra Energy Ltd., 1984 (critical sour well in the Sundre area)
Date
1984
Title
Decision on application by Canterra Energy Ltd., 1984 (critical sour well in the Sundre area)
Date
1984
Applicant
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Application Number
830495
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Bergen area
Sour gas
Sundre area
Well licence
Blowout control
Blowout preventer
Casing string design
Drilling program
Emergency procedure
ID-81-03
Exploratory well
Gas producing
Gas well
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
Inspecting
Leduc Fm
NTS 82O
Marketing
Plugging
Producing well
Safety
Safety equipment
Solvent
Sulphur
Well classification
Notes
Decision D84-28 on application No. 830495 for a licence to drill a critical sour gas well in the Sundre area in LSD 12-12-32-6 W5M to evaluate and obtain production from the Leduc FM; Board hearing 1984-08-01/02/03/07/08/09/10/11
Interveners
Bergen Ratepayers Association
Inter-Varsity Christian Fellowship
Community of Fallen Timber
Town of Sundre
Mountain View Land Holders Group
City of Red Deer
Amoco Canada Petroleum Co. Ltd.
Burton, S.
Cloakey, G.E.
Goodwin, B.
Goodwin, M.
Grimstead, J.
Grimstead, C.
Halvorson, I.
Halvorson, M.
Worobetz, T.
Worobetz, M.
The Bauman Family
Bauman, Dr. J.A.
Haug, J.
Orr, J.
Huisman, Dr. R.
Newell, A.
Location
12-12-032-06W5
Less detail

Decision 85-41

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision902
Applicant
Westhill Resources Ltd
Application Number
850138
Title
Decision on application by Westhill Resources Ltd., 1985 (section 22, township 54, range 25, W4M, Campbell Namao Campbell Blairmore A pool Campbell-Namao field)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Westhill Resources Ltd., 1985 (section 22, township 54, range 25, W4M, Campbell Namao Campbell Blairmore A pool Campbell-Namao field)
Date
1985
Applicant
Westhill Resources Ltd
Application Number
850138
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bellows LA
Pow JR
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Compulsory pooling
Descriptors
Campbell Namao field
Compulsory pooling
Concurrent production
Drilling spacing unit
Gas cap
Gas producing
Geologic interpretation
NTS 83H
Oil recovery
Reservoir boundary
Well classification
Zone designation
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S74
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.030
Notes
Decision D85-41 on application No. 850138 for termination of Order No. P38, concurrent production from Campbell-Namao Campbell Blairmore A pool and establishment of DSU's of one LSD for production of gas from the A pool within section 22-54-25 W4M and that the Board coalesce the Campbell Namao Campbell Blairmore B pool located in NE quarter of section 22 with the A pool.
Interveners
Richard J. Churchill Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 2010-27

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4427
Applicant
West Energy Limited
Application Number
1623557
Title
Decision 2010-027 : West Energy Ltd. application for a well licence Pembina Field
Date
2010
Title
Decision 2010-027 : West Energy Ltd. application for a well licence Pembina Field
Date
2010
Applicant
West Energy Limited
Application Number
1623557
Hearing Panel
Miller GJ
McManus BT
Willard RJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Pembina Field
NTS 83G
Directive 056
Well licence
Pollution
Environment
Hydrogen sulphide
Directional well
Health
Safety
Natural area
Gas flaring
Emergency response plan
Well classification
Wetland
Compensation
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Interveners
Logan J
Logan B
Kerpan C
Losey Dr. TC
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
APPENDIX 2 SUMMARY OF CONDITIONS AND COMMITMENTS Conditions generally are requirements in addition to or otherwise expanding upon existing regulations and guidelines. An applicant must comply with conditions or it is in breach of its approval and subject to enforcement action by the ERCB. Enforcement of an approval includes enforcement of the conditions attached to that licence. Sanctions imposed for the breach of such conditions may include the suspension of the approval, resulting in the shut-in of a facility. The conditions imposed on the licence are summarized below. The Board notes that West has made certain undertakings, promises, and commitments (collectively referred to as commitments) to parties involving activities or operations that are not strictly required under ERCB requirements. These commitments are separate arrangements between the parties and do not constitute conditions to the ERCB’s approval of the application. The commitments that have been given some weight by the Board are summarized below. The Board expects the applicant to comply with commitments made to all parties. However, while the Board has considered these commitments in arriving at its decision, the Board cannot enforce them. If the applicant does not comply with commitments made, affected parties may request a review of the original approval. At that time, the ERCB will assess whether the circumstances regarding any failed commitment warrant a review of the original approval. CONDITIONS
The Board directs West to submit a complete and detailed drilling plan for Board approval prior to drilling.
The Board directs West to delineate the boundaries of the wetland within 100 m of the lease, identify a more appropriate location for soil storage, and submit a revised survey plan that shows avoidance of any activity or placement of any materials in the wetland area.
The Board directs West to conduct all precritical sour notifications and meetings associated with critical wells prior to drilling into the Nisku Formation. The Board will require that a field inspector from the ERCB attend the ERP review meeting. COMMITMENTS BY WEST ENERGY LTD.
To drill, complete, and test the well as if it were a critical well.
To meet with the Logans to gain all the information relevant to the ERP.
To minimize flaring during completions and testing.
To suspend operations when technically possible and safe to do so during normal sour operations if an egress road inside the EPZ becomes impassable due to weather.
To advise the Logans of the actual H2S content of the well if it is successful.
To place an air monitor on the Logans’ property, if requested, during drilling, completions, and testing of the well.
To include the Logans, if requested, in the completion and testing ERP.
To ground truth the Modeste Creek Natural Area before the well is drilled. To locate and mark out main trails using GPS and to update its maps. To provide copies of the updated map to the Logans, the Board, and the Modeste Creek Valley Watershed Society.
Location
11-32-049-05W5
Less detail