39 records – page 1 of 2.

Decision 79-E

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2340
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
770866
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Section 43 and Coal Conservation Act, Section 27)
Date
1979
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Section 43 and Coal Conservation Act, Section 27)
Date
1979
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
770866
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Berkowitz N
Bohme VE
Solodzuk W
Isbister WD
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cold Lake area
Cold Lake heavy oil project
Heavy oil project
Steam injection
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Viscous oil recovery
Benefit cost analysis
Bituminous deposit
Coal - fuel
Environmental impact
IL-OG-74-05
Flexicoking
Industrial development permit
Manufactured crude oil
Material balance
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 73L
Recovery factor
Reserve
Socio-economic effect
Upgrading
Waste disposal
Waste water
Water supply
Well spacing
Legal References
Coal Conservation Act S27
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S43
Notes
ERCB Report 79-E on application no. 770866 to produce and upgrade crude bitumen and for an industrial development permit to use coal as a fuel for the project (TP.64-65, R.3-4, W4M); Board hearing 1978-09-05 adjourned to 1978-12-04 through 1978-12-20 and 1979-01-03 through 1979-01-08 and 1979-05-29/30/31; Report 81-C on application (Application no. 800664) to change makeup fuel and ERCB Decision D83-21 for later application (No. 830620) for phased development of the project
Less detail

Decision 81-16

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1992
Applicant
Nova, an Alberta Corporation
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
800910
Title
Decision on application by Nova, an Alberta Corporation and Shell Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Nova, an Alberta Corporation and Shell Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
Date
1981
Applicant
Nova, an Alberta Corporation
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
800910
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Webber HJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Ethylene homopolymer
Industrial development permit
Red Deer area
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Ethylene - raw material
Land use
Locating
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
Noise (sound)
NTS 83A
Plant location
Pollution
Socio-economic effect
Supply (economics)
Water quality
Water supply
Notes
Decision 81-16 on application No. 800910 to use ethylene as feedstock and gas as fuel to manufacture polyethylene at a LINEAR low-density polyethylene plant to be constructed on the site of Alberta gas ethylene'S existing ethylene plant east of Red Deer (TP.38-40, R.23-27, W4M).
Interveners
Preserve Agricultural Land
Alberta Institute of Agrologists Red Deer Branch
F.E.M. Farms
Hainsworth, J.W.
Federation of Alberta Naturalists Land Use Committee
Red Deer Regional Planning Commission
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Du Pont Canada Inc.
Esso Chemical Canada
Less detail

Decision 81-24

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1984
Applicant
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Application Number
800889
Title
Decision on application by Union Carbide Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene glycol)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Union Carbide Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene glycol)
Date
1981
Applicant
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Application Number
800889
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
McAndrews CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Ethylene glycol
Industrial development permit
Prentiss area
Agricultural land
Conflict
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Energy development
Environmental impact
Ethylene - raw material
Land use
Locating
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 83A
Plant location
Socio-economic effect
Supply (economics)
Water supply
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 81-24 on application No. 800889 to use ethylene as feedstock and gas as fuel to produce ethylene glycol in a new plant to be constructed near Prentiss (section 30-39-25 W4M); Board hearing 1981-04-14/15/16/20/21
Interveners
Preserve Agricultural Land
Craigievar Farms
Unifarm
Christian Farmers Federation
Red Deer Board of the Alberta Institute of Agrologists
Superior Sod Farms
F.E.M. Farms Ltd.
Carlyle, R.J.
Friesen, G.
Hainsworth, J.W.
Russell, M.
Russell, E.
Low, D.C.
Chessor, D.
Sather, A.P.
Red Deer River Regional Planning Commission
Buffalo Lake Regional Resources Project
Alix Chamber of Commerce
Village of Mirror
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Esso Chemical Canada
Du Pont Canada Inc.
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
NOVA, AN ALBERTA CORPORATION
Shell Canada Limited
Less detail

Decision 82-23

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2055
Applicant
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
820283
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (well licence to drill an exploratory well Millarville area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (well licence to drill an exploratory well Millarville area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
820283
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Brushett ER
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Sour gas
Well licence
Community relations
Contamination
Drilling fluid
Drilling program
Drilling Waste disposal
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
ID-81-03
Exploratory well
Gas well
Safety
Waste disposal
Water supply
Water well
Legal References
EUB Rules of Practice
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
Decision 82-23 on application No. 820283 to drill the proposed well Gulf et al Millarville 6-32-22-4 directionally from a surface location in LSD 14-29-22-4 W5M.
Interveners
Rusticana Estates,Echo Hill and surrounding area residents
Canadian Wildlife Federation
Location
06-32-022-04W5
14-29-022-04W5
Less detail

Decision 82-36

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2043
Applicant
Albion Petroleum Corporation Limited
Application Number
820244
Title
Decision on application by Albion Petroleum Corporation Ltd., 1982 (experimental in situ oil sands scheme in the Bonnyville area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Albion Petroleum Corporation Ltd., 1982 (experimental in situ oil sands scheme in the Bonnyville area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Albion Petroleum Corporation Limited
Application Number
820244
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Bonnyville area
Cyclic steam injection
In situ
Steam injection
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Air quality
Colony sand
Emission
Environmental impact
Grand Rapids Fm
Land use
Noise (sound)
NTS 73L
Pilot scale
Pollution
Producing equipment
Safety
Waste disposal
Water disposal
Water supply
Well pattern
Well spacing
Notes
Decision 82-36 on application No. 820244 for an experimental oil sands scheme in section 12-61-6 W4M to recover bitumen from the Colony sand of the Cold Lake-upper Grand Rapids oil sand deposit by drilling 17 slant hole wells and completing an existing evaluation well to form an 18-well pattern an using cyclic steam injection.
Interveners
Community Advisory Committee
W-32 Corporation Limited
Six-Vee Enterprises Limited
BP Exploration Canada Limited
Less detail

Decision 83-13

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2330
Applicant
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
820346
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., 1983 (Okotoks sour gas processing plant)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., 1983 (Okotoks sour gas processing plant)
Date
1983
Applicant
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
820346
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Bohme VE
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Conflict
Gas processing plant
Mazeppa gas plant
Okotoks field
Sour gas
Benefit cost analysis
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
ID-81-03
IL-80-24
Gas reserve
Health
Livestock
Locating
NTS 82I
Plant location
Safety
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Water supply
Water use
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision no.D83-13 on application No. 820346 for sour gas processing plant in the Mazeppa area of Okotoks field in section 3-20-28 W4M or section 35-19-28 W4M; see also Decision D83-12 on related proceeding No. 821137 (public inquiry to consider potential conflicts between development of sour gas reserves and residential development in the Okotoks area);Board hearing 1983-04-11/12/13/14/15/18
Interveners
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Committee for Toxic Pollutant Controls
Goldenview Farms Ltd.
Pan-Alberta Gas Ltd.
Rio Frio Ranch Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 83-21

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1184
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
830371
Title
Examiners report on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1983 (experimental scheme for enhanced oil recovery by Alkaline solution injection Viking Kinsella Wainwright B pool)
Date
1983
Title
Examiners report on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1983 (experimental scheme for enhanced oil recovery by Alkaline solution injection Viking Kinsella Wainwright B pool)
Date
1983
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
830371
Hearing Panel
Bellows LA
Stafford GH
Sharp KG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Caustic waterflooding
Enhanced recovery scheme
Viking Kinsella field
Viscous oil recovery
Contamination
Environmental impact
Groundwater
Injection pressure
Injection well
Monitoring
NTS 73E
Pilot scale
Wainwright Fm
Water supply
Water use
Water well
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E83-21 on application No. 830371 for approval of an experimental scheme for enhanced oil recovery by alkaline solution injection in part of the Viking-Kinsella Wainwright B pool in section 17-48-8 W4M; Examiners hearing 1983-10-18/19
Interveners
Buffalo Creek Water Resources Environmental Association
Nydokus, M.
Nydokus, R.R.
Less detail

Decision 83-C

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2435
Applicant
Mercoal Minerals Ltd.
Application Number
820385
Title
Decision on application by Mercoal Minerals Ltd., 1983 (Mercoal coal project)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Mercoal Minerals Ltd., 1983 (Mercoal coal project)
Date
1983
Applicant
Mercoal Minerals Ltd.
Application Number
820385
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Strom NA
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Coal
Descriptors
Alberta Coal Branch
Coal mine
Coal preparation plant
Coal project
Hinton area
Mercoal coal project
Surface mining
Air quality
Benefit cost analysis
Bituminous coal
Coal reserve
Coalspur coal field
Cost analysis
Design criteria
Dust control
Economic analysis
Employment
Environmental impact
Land reclamation
Land use
Mine design
Marketing
NTS 83F
Open pit mining
Overburden ratio
Reforestation
Socio-economic effect
Tailings
Tailings - storage
Thermal coal
Waste disposal
Water quality
Water supply
Legal References
Coal Conservation Act S10
Coal Conservation Act S23
Notes
ERCB report D83-C on application No. 820385 to develop a surface coal mine to produce high volatile C bituminous coal and to construct a coal processing plant, to be located in TP.47-49, R.20-23, W5; Board hearing 1982-11-02/03/04
Less detail

Decision 84-16

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1848
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
840296
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1984 (application to proceed with phases 3 and 4 of the Cold Lake project)
Date
1984
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1984 (application to proceed with phases 3 and 4 of the Cold Lake project)
Date
1984
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
840296
Hearing Type
Board
No Hearing
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cold Lake heavy oil project
Heavy oil project
Air quality
Disposal well
Emission
Environmental impact
Expansion
NTS 73L
Socio-economic effect
Sulphur dioxide
Waste disposal
Water use
Water disposal
Water supply
Notes
Decision D84-16 on application No. 840296 to proceed, pursuant to provisions of approval No. 3950, with phases 3 and 4 of the Cold Lake project in TP.64-66, R.3-4, W4M; no hearing; see related Decisions - ERCB report 79-E for Decision on original application, ERCB report 81-C on application to use natural gas as make up fuel, Decision D83-21 on application to allow for phased development and Decision D85-17 on application to proceed with phases 5 & 6
Less detail

Decision 84-17

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1159
Applicant
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
840466
Title
Examiners report on application by Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1984 (application for a well licence)
Date
1984
Title
Examiners report on application by Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1984 (application for a well licence)
Date
1984
Applicant
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
840466
Hearing Panel
Berndtsson NG
Sharp KG
Vrskovy MJ
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Rycroft field
Well licence
Agricultural land
Bluesky Fm
Charlie Lake Fm
Contamination
Environmental impact
Locating
NTS 83M
Oil producing
Target area
Water supply
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E84-17 on application No. 840466 for a well licence to drill a well in the Rycroft field in LSD 14-16-77-5 W6M to obtain production from the Bluesky and Charlie Lake formations.
Interveners
Rukavina, J.
Location
14-16-077-05W6
Less detail

Decision 85-15

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1680
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
840227
Title
Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1985 (commercial oil sands project (phase 1) Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1985 (commercial oil sands project (phase 1) Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
840227
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Carbon dioxide injection
Cyclic steam injection
Elk Point area
Elk Point project
In situ
Industrial plant
Lindbergh field
Steam flooding
Steam injection
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Air quality
Bitumen
Cleaning
Contamination
Disposal well
Emission
Environmental impact
ID-80-02
Hydrogen sulphide
Land reclamation
Land use
Locating
Monitoring
NTS 73E
Noise (sound)
Pollution
Recovery factor
Recycling
Socio-economic effect
Waste disposal
Water disposal
Water supply
Water well
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
Decision D85-15 (with addendum) on application No. 840227 for approval of phase 1 of a three phase commercial oil sands project (Elk Point project) in Lindbergh sector of Cold Lake oil sands deposits, consisting of 13-well cyclic steam and steam flood stimulation project on 2 Hectare well spacing and a 640 CU. M./day bitumen cleaning plant (TP.54-46, R.5-7 W4M); Board hearing 1985-01-08/09/12/15-18/21-23
Interveners
Kadutski, D.
Kadutski, C.
Kadutski, M.
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Keith, L.
Group of Elk Point -Lindbergh Area Residents
Town of Elk Point
County of St. Paul
Westmin Resources Limited
Less detail

Decision 85-17

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1495
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
850037
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1985 (to proceed with phases V and VI of the Cold Lake project)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1985 (to proceed with phases V and VI of the Cold Lake project)
Date
1985
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
850037
Hearing Panel
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
No Hearing
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cold Lake heavy oil project
Heavy oil project
In situ
Clearwater Fm
Expansion
NTS 73L
Recycling
Socio-economic effect
Water supply
Water use
Well spacing
Notes
Decision D85-17 on application No. 850037 by ESSO for approval to proceed with phases V and VI of the Cold Lake project in TP.64-66, R.3-4 W4M; no hearing; see also ERCB report 79-E for Decision on original application, report 81-C on application to use natural gas as make-up fuel, Decision D83-21 on application to allow for phased development, and Decision D84-16 on application to proceed with phases 3 & 4
Less detail

Decision 85-36

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision983
Applicant
Murphy Oil Company Limited.
Application Number
841338
Title
Decision on application by Murphy Oil Company Limited, 1985 (commercial oil sands project phase 1, Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Murphy Oil Company Limited, 1985 (commercial oil sands project phase 1, Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Applicant
Murphy Oil Company Limited.
Application Number
841338
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bellows LA
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cyclic steam injection
Elk Point area
In situ
Lindbergh area
Lindbergh thermal recovery project
Steam injection
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Agricultural land
Air quality
Community relations
Directional well
Drilling fluid
Drilling Waste disposal
Electric power distribution
Environmental impact
Land reclamation
NTS 73L
Recovery factor
Right of way
Transmission corridor
Waste disposal
Water supply
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
Decision D85-36 on application No. 841338 for approval in principle of the Lindbergh thermal recovery project (being an expansion of an experimental scheme operating in section 13-58-5 W4M) and to construct and operate phase 1 to recover crude bitumen from the Cold Lake oil sands deposits using a cyclic steam stimulation recovery technique; Board hearing 1985-06-18 and 1985-07-03/04/05
Interveners
Opanavicius, A.
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Elizabeth Metis Settlement Association No.9 and Federation of Metis Settlements
Town of Elk Point
Dome Petroleum Limited
Alberta Municipal Affairs
Less detail

Decision 85-39

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision971
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Cominco Chemicals and Fertilizers
Application Number
850703
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Cominco Chemicals and Fertilizers, 1985 (industrial development permit to manufacture ammonia)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Cominco Chemicals and Fertilizers, 1985 (industrial development permit to manufacture ammonia)
Date
1985
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Cominco Chemicals and Fertilizers
Application Number
850703
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Homeniuk TF
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Ammonia
Chemical plant
Industrial development permit
Red Deer area
Agricultural land
Air quality
Capitalized cost
Emission
Environmental impact
Hydrogen
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
Nitrogen
NTS 83A
Plant location
Raw material
Socio-economic effect
Waste water
Water supply
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S30
Notes
Decision D85-39 on application No. 850703 for industrial development permit authorizing the use of hydrogen as raw material and natural gas as fuel to produce anhydrous ammonia at a plant to be constructed near Joffre (TP.39, R.22-23, W4M).
Interveners
Chessor, D.
Preserve Agricultural Land
Canadian Fertilizers Ltd.
The Alberta Gas Ethylene Co. Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 85-42

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision968
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
850428
850798
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Commercial oil sands project and water disposal scheme Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Commercial oil sands project and water disposal scheme Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
850428
850798
Hearing Panel
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Homeniuk TF
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cyclic steam injection
Dome Lindbergh project
In situ
Lindbergh area
Produced water
Steam injection
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Water disposal
Agricultural land
Air quality
Cummings Fm
Directional well
Disposal well
Emission
Environmental impact
Groundwater
Land reclamation
Locating
Monitoring
NTS 73E
Noise (sound)
Planning
Pollution
Recycling
Waste disposal
Water producing
Water supply
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
Decision D85-42 on application No. 850428 and 850798 by Dome on behalf of itself & its partners Sulpetro and CNG producing Company for a commercial oil sands deposit in TP.53-56, R.4-6, W4M and water disposal scheme, Lindbergh sector (being an expansion of current experimental project to commercial scale); Board hearing 1984-11-04/05/06
Interveners
Miller, L.
Kozicky, C.
Melnyk, A.
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Town of Elk Point
Westmin Resources Limited
Less detail

Decision 85-45

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision904
Applicant
Suncor Inc.
Application Number
850952
Title
Decision on application by Suncor Inc., 1985 (commercial oil sands project Primrose sector)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Suncor Inc., 1985 (commercial oil sands project Primrose sector)
Date
1985
Applicant
Suncor Inc.
Application Number
850952
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bellows LA
Fox EG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cyclic steam injection
In situ
Steam injection
Suncor Primrose-Clearwater project
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Clearwater Fm
Directional well
NTS 73L
Recovery
Water supply
Water use
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
Decision D85-45 on application No. 850952 by Suncor on behalf of itself, Alberta energy Co., Canadian Hunter and Pangaea, for a commercial oil sands project to recover crude bitumen resources from the Cold Lake Clearwater oil sands deposit using a cyclic steam stimulation recovery (TP 67-68, R 2-3, W4M).
Interveners
The Town of Cold Lake
Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
Cold Lake First Nations
Less detail

Decision 86-10|86-10 Addendum

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision625
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Application Number
860168
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1986 (commercial oil sands project Lindbergh and Frog Lake sectors) (and addendum)
Date
1986
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1986 (commercial oil sands project Lindbergh and Frog Lake sectors) (and addendum)
Date
1986
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Application Number
860168
Hearing Type
Board
No Hearing
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cyclic steam injection
Elk Point area
In situ
Lindbergh area
Lindbergh Frog Lake project
Steam injection
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Air quality
Cummings Fm
Environmental impact
Noise (sound)
North Saskatchewan River
NTS 73E
Pollution control
Recycling
Socio-economic effect
Water disposal
Water supply
Water use
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
Decision D86-10 (with addendum) on application No. 860168 to construct and operate phase 1 of a proposed 3-phase commercial project to recover bitumen from Cummings FM of Cold Lake oil sands deposit in Lindbergh & Frog Lake sectors (TP.55-56, R.5-6, W4M) by cyclic steam injection and to include existing experimental scheme in commercial project; resulted in Order No. Misc 8501A and approval No. 5047; no hearing
Less detail

Decision 87-21

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision169
Applicant
Skimmer Oil Separators Ltd.
Application Number
871196
Title
Decision on application by Skimmer Oil Separators Ltd., 1987 (waste processing and disposal facility Lloydminster field)
Date
1987
Title
Decision on application by Skimmer Oil Separators Ltd., 1987 (waste processing and disposal facility Lloydminster field)
Date
1987
Applicant
Skimmer Oil Separators Ltd.
Application Number
871196
Hearing Panel
Goodman CJ
Prince JP
Brushett ER
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Oil waste
Waste disposal
Waste oil recovery
Waste treatment
Groundwater
Environmental impact
Noise (sound)
NTS 73E
Water supply
Truck
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.002
Notes
Decision D87-21 on application No. 871196 for approval to construct and operate a waste processing and disposal facility in LSD 14-31-51-2 W4M; exhibits D3-D6 consisting of four samples from geology pit and field tank are filed in the library (kept in locked drawer that houses the ARC Documents)
Interveners
Blair, H.
Blair, L.
Corr, H.
Marwayne Support Group
Behnke, B.
Butler, L.
Cooke, R.
Hines, L.
Inge, S.
Johnson, A.
Johnson, R.
Kent, T.
Luchyk, B.
Nohnychuk, R.
Taylor, L.
Young, R.
Lloydminster Heavy Crude Services Ltd.
Sunrise Well Services Ltd.
Ro-Vac Pump Truck Services
Temor Oil Services
Home Oil Co. Ltd.
Wilson, W.H.
Location
14-31-051-02W4
Less detail

Decision 88-11

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision166
Applicant
Cimarron Petroleum Ltd.
ICG Resources Ltd.
Application Number
880035
880036
880037
Title
Decision on application by Cimarron Petroleum Ltd. and ICG Resources Ltd., 1988 (well licences)
Date
1988
Title
Decision on application by Cimarron Petroleum Ltd. and ICG Resources Ltd., 1988 (well licences)
Date
1988
Applicant
Cimarron Petroleum Ltd.
ICG Resources Ltd.
Application Number
880035
880036
880037
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Morin EJ
Prince JP
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Sour gas
Well licence
Directional well
Elkton Fm
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Gas well
Land use
Land value
NTS 82O
Residential building
Rundle Gp
Safety
Urban development
Water supply
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
Decision D88-11 on application No. 880035 (Cimarron) for a licence to drill a well from a surface location in LSD 13-15-26-1 W5M to obtain production from the Elkton member of the Rundle FM; on application No. 880036 (ICG resources) for a licence to drill a well in LSD 6-10-26-1 W5M to obtain production from the Elkton FM; on application No. 880037 (ICG resources) for a licence to drill a well in LSD 14-10-26-1 W5M to obtain production from the Elkton FM.
Interveners
The Niedzwiecki Family
Niedzwiecki, S.E.
C.B. Stickle Group
Stickle, B.A.
Ammerati, V.
Triple Five Corporation Ltd.
City of Calgary
Calgary Regional Planning Commission
Location
13-15-026-01W5
06-10-026-01W5
14-10-026-01W5
Less detail

Decision 89-AA

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision136
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Alberta. Dept. of the Environment
Title
Water recycle guidelines and reporting water use information for in situ oil sands facilities in Alberta
Date
1989
Title
Water recycle guidelines and reporting water use information for in situ oil sands facilities in Alberta
Date
1989
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Alberta. Dept. of the Environment
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Recycling
Oil sands oil recovery
Waste water
Water
Water conservation
Water quality
Water resource
Water supply
Water treating
Alberta
Monitoring
Procedure
Regulation
Research and development
Notes
see also ERCB IL 89-5
Less detail

39 records – page 1 of 2.