Narrow Results By
Applicant
- Alberta Energy Company Limited 1
- Alberta. Dept. of the Environment 1
- Albion Petroleum Corporation Limited 1
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited 1
- Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd. 1
- Cimarron Petroleum Ltd. 1
- Cominco Chemicals and Fertilizers 1
- Consolidated Mic Mac Oils Ltd. 1
- Dome Petroleum Limited 2
- ESSO Resources Canada Limited 3
- EnCana Corporation 1
- Energy Resources Conservation Board 1
Decision 79-E
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2340
- Applicant
- ESSO Resources Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 770866
- Title
- Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Section 43 and Coal Conservation Act, Section 27)
- Date
- 1979
- Title
- Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Section 43 and Coal Conservation Act, Section 27)
- Date
- 1979
- Applicant
- ESSO Resources Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 770866
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Berkowitz N
- Bohme VE
- Solodzuk W
- Isbister WD
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Cold Lake area
- Cold Lake heavy oil project
- Heavy oil project
- Steam injection
- Oil sands project
- Thermal recovery
- Viscous oil recovery
- Benefit cost analysis
- Bituminous deposit
- Coal - fuel
- Environmental impact
- IL-OG-74-05
- Flexicoking
- Industrial development permit
- Manufactured crude oil
- Material balance
- Natural gas - fuel
- NTS 73L
- Recovery factor
- Reserve
- Socio-economic effect
- Upgrading
- Waste disposal
- Waste water
- Water supply
- Well spacing
- Legal References
- Coal Conservation Act S27
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S43
- Notes
- ERCB Report 79-E on application no. 770866 to produce and upgrade crude bitumen and for an industrial development permit to use coal as a fuel for the project (TP.64-65, R.3-4, W4M); Board hearing 1978-09-05 adjourned to 1978-12-04 through 1978-12-20 and 1979-01-03 through 1979-01-08 and 1979-05-29/30/31; Report 81-C on application (Application no. 800664) to change makeup fuel and ERCB Decision D83-21 for later application (No. 830620) for phased development of the project
Decision 81-16
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1992
- Applicant
- Nova, an Alberta Corporation
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 800910
- Title
- Decision on application by Nova, an Alberta Corporation and Shell Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
- Date
- 1981
- Title
- Decision on application by Nova, an Alberta Corporation and Shell Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
- Date
- 1981
- Application Number
- 800910
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Strom NA
- Webber HJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Chemical plant
- Ethylene homopolymer
- Industrial development permit
- Red Deer area
- Demand (economics)
- Economic analysis
- Environmental impact
- Ethylene - raw material
- Land use
- Locating
- Marketing
- Natural gas - fuel
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 83A
- Plant location
- Pollution
- Socio-economic effect
- Supply (economics)
- Water quality
- Water supply
- Notes
- Decision 81-16 on application No. 800910 to use ethylene as feedstock and gas as fuel to manufacture polyethylene at a LINEAR low-density polyethylene plant to be constructed on the site of Alberta gas ethylene'S existing ethylene plant east of Red Deer (TP.38-40, R.23-27, W4M).
- Interveners
- Preserve Agricultural Land
- Alberta Institute of Agrologists Red Deer Branch
- F.E.M. Farms
- Hainsworth, J.W.
- Federation of Alberta Naturalists Land Use Committee
- Red Deer Regional Planning Commission
- Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
- Union Carbide Canada Limited
- Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
- Du Pont Canada Inc.
- Esso Chemical Canada
Decision 81-24
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1984
- Applicant
- Union Carbide Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 800889
- Title
- Decision on application by Union Carbide Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene glycol)
- Date
- 1981
- Title
- Decision on application by Union Carbide Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene glycol)
- Date
- 1981
- Applicant
- Union Carbide Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 800889
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Bohme VE
- Goodman CJ
- McAndrews CJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Chemical plant
- Ethylene glycol
- Industrial development permit
- Prentiss area
- Agricultural land
- Conflict
- Demand (economics)
- Economic analysis
- Energy development
- Environmental impact
- Ethylene - raw material
- Land use
- Locating
- Marketing
- Natural gas - fuel
- NTS 83A
- Plant location
- Socio-economic effect
- Supply (economics)
- Water supply
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- Decision 81-24 on application No. 800889 to use ethylene as feedstock and gas as fuel to produce ethylene glycol in a new plant to be constructed near Prentiss (section 30-39-25 W4M); Board hearing 1981-04-14/15/16/20/21
- Interveners
- Preserve Agricultural Land
- Craigievar Farms
- Unifarm
- Christian Farmers Federation
- Red Deer Board of the Alberta Institute of Agrologists
- Superior Sod Farms
- F.E.M. Farms Ltd.
- Carlyle, R.J.
- Friesen, G.
- Hainsworth, J.W.
- Russell, M.
- Russell, E.
- Low, D.C.
- Chessor, D.
- Sather, A.P.
- Red Deer River Regional Planning Commission
- Buffalo Lake Regional Resources Project
- Alix Chamber of Commerce
- Village of Mirror
- Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
- Esso Chemical Canada
- Du Pont Canada Inc.
- Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
- NOVA, AN ALBERTA CORPORATION
- Shell Canada Limited
Decision 82-23
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2055
- Applicant
- Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
- Application Number
- 820283
- Title
- Decision on application by Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (well licence to drill an exploratory well Millarville area)
- Date
- 1982
- Title
- Decision on application by Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (well licence to drill an exploratory well Millarville area)
- Date
- 1982
- Applicant
- Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
- Application Number
- 820283
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Bohme VE
- Brushett ER
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Sour gas
- Well licence
- Community relations
- Contamination
- Drilling fluid
- Drilling program
- Drilling Waste disposal
- Emergency procedure
- Environmental impact
- ID-81-03
- Exploratory well
- Gas well
- Safety
- Waste disposal
- Water supply
- Water well
- Legal References
- EUB Rules of Practice
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Notes
- Decision 82-23 on application No. 820283 to drill the proposed well Gulf et al Millarville 6-32-22-4 directionally from a surface location in LSD 14-29-22-4 W5M.
- Interveners
- Rusticana Estates,Echo Hill and surrounding area residents
- Canadian Wildlife Federation
- Location
- 06-32-022-04W5
- 14-29-022-04W5
Decision 82-36
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2043
- Applicant
- Albion Petroleum Corporation Limited
- Application Number
- 820244
- Title
- Decision on application by Albion Petroleum Corporation Ltd., 1982 (experimental in situ oil sands scheme in the Bonnyville area)
- Date
- 1982
- Title
- Decision on application by Albion Petroleum Corporation Ltd., 1982 (experimental in situ oil sands scheme in the Bonnyville area)
- Date
- 1982
- Applicant
- Albion Petroleum Corporation Limited
- Application Number
- 820244
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Strom NA
- Goodman CJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Bonnyville area
- Cyclic steam injection
- In situ
- Steam injection
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Air quality
- Colony sand
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Grand Rapids Fm
- Land use
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 73L
- Pilot scale
- Pollution
- Producing equipment
- Safety
- Waste disposal
- Water disposal
- Water supply
- Well pattern
- Well spacing
- Notes
- Decision 82-36 on application No. 820244 for an experimental oil sands scheme in section 12-61-6 W4M to recover bitumen from the Colony sand of the Cold Lake-upper Grand Rapids oil sand deposit by drilling 17 slant hole wells and completing an existing evaluation well to form an 18-well pattern an using cyclic steam injection.
- Interveners
- Community Advisory Committee
- W-32 Corporation Limited
- Six-Vee Enterprises Limited
- BP Exploration Canada Limited
Decision 83-13
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2330
- Applicant
- Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
- Application Number
- 820346
- Title
- Decision on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., 1983 (Okotoks sour gas processing plant)
- Date
- 1983
- Title
- Decision on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., 1983 (Okotoks sour gas processing plant)
- Date
- 1983
- Applicant
- Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
- Application Number
- 820346
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- Bohme VE
- Strom NA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Conflict
- Gas processing plant
- Mazeppa gas plant
- Okotoks field
- Sour gas
- Benefit cost analysis
- Emergency procedure
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- ID-81-03
- IL-80-24
- Gas reserve
- Health
- Livestock
- Locating
- NTS 82I
- Plant location
- Safety
- Sulphur dioxide
- Sulphur recovery
- Water supply
- Water use
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Notes
- Decision no.D83-13 on application No. 820346 for sour gas processing plant in the Mazeppa area of Okotoks field in section 3-20-28 W4M or section 35-19-28 W4M; see also Decision D83-12 on related proceeding No. 821137 (public inquiry to consider potential conflicts between development of sour gas reserves and residential development in the Okotoks area);Board hearing 1983-04-11/12/13/14/15/18
- Interveners
- Canterra Energy Ltd.
- Committee for Toxic Pollutant Controls
- Goldenview Farms Ltd.
- Pan-Alberta Gas Ltd.
- Rio Frio Ranch Ltd.
Decision 83-21
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1184
- Applicant
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 830371
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1983 (experimental scheme for enhanced oil recovery by Alkaline solution injection Viking Kinsella Wainwright B pool)
- Date
- 1983
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1983 (experimental scheme for enhanced oil recovery by Alkaline solution injection Viking Kinsella Wainwright B pool)
- Date
- 1983
- Applicant
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 830371
- Hearing Panel
- Bellows LA
- Stafford GH
- Sharp KG
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Enhanced recovery
- Descriptors
- Caustic waterflooding
- Enhanced recovery scheme
- Viking Kinsella field
- Viscous oil recovery
- Contamination
- Environmental impact
- Groundwater
- Injection pressure
- Injection well
- Monitoring
- NTS 73E
- Pilot scale
- Wainwright Fm
- Water supply
- Water use
- Water well
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Notes
- ERCB Examiners report E83-21 on application No. 830371 for approval of an experimental scheme for enhanced oil recovery by alkaline solution injection in part of the Viking-Kinsella Wainwright B pool in section 17-48-8 W4M; Examiners hearing 1983-10-18/19
- Interveners
- Buffalo Creek Water Resources Environmental Association
- Nydokus, M.
- Nydokus, R.R.
Decision 83-C
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2435
- Applicant
- Mercoal Minerals Ltd.
- Application Number
- 820385
- Title
- Decision on application by Mercoal Minerals Ltd., 1983 (Mercoal coal project)
- Date
- 1983
- Title
- Decision on application by Mercoal Minerals Ltd., 1983 (Mercoal coal project)
- Date
- 1983
- Applicant
- Mercoal Minerals Ltd.
- Application Number
- 820385
- Hearing Panel
- Berkowitz N
- Strom NA
- Mink FJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Coal
- Descriptors
- Alberta Coal Branch
- Coal mine
- Coal preparation plant
- Coal project
- Hinton area
- Mercoal coal project
- Surface mining
- Air quality
- Benefit cost analysis
- Bituminous coal
- Coal reserve
- Coalspur coal field
- Cost analysis
- Design criteria
- Dust control
- Economic analysis
- Employment
- Environmental impact
- Land reclamation
- Land use
- Mine design
- Marketing
- NTS 83F
- Open pit mining
- Overburden ratio
- Reforestation
- Socio-economic effect
- Tailings
- Tailings - storage
- Thermal coal
- Waste disposal
- Water quality
- Water supply
- Legal References
- Coal Conservation Act S10
- Coal Conservation Act S23
- Notes
- ERCB report D83-C on application No. 820385 to develop a surface coal mine to produce high volatile C bituminous coal and to construct a coal processing plant, to be located in TP.47-49, R.20-23, W5; Board hearing 1982-11-02/03/04
Decision 84-16
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1848
- Applicant
- ESSO Resources Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 840296
- Title
- Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1984 (application to proceed with phases 3 and 4 of the Cold Lake project)
- Date
- 1984
- Title
- Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1984 (application to proceed with phases 3 and 4 of the Cold Lake project)
- Date
- 1984
- Applicant
- ESSO Resources Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 840296
- Hearing Type
- Board
- No Hearing
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Cold Lake heavy oil project
- Heavy oil project
- Air quality
- Disposal well
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Expansion
- NTS 73L
- Socio-economic effect
- Sulphur dioxide
- Waste disposal
- Water use
- Water disposal
- Water supply
- Notes
- Decision D84-16 on application No. 840296 to proceed, pursuant to provisions of approval No. 3950, with phases 3 and 4 of the Cold Lake project in TP.64-66, R.3-4, W4M; no hearing; see related Decisions - ERCB report 79-E for Decision on original application, ERCB report 81-C on application to use natural gas as make up fuel, Decision D83-21 on application to allow for phased development and Decision D85-17 on application to proceed with phases 5 & 6
Decision 84-17
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1159
- Applicant
- Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
- Application Number
- 840466
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1984 (application for a well licence)
- Date
- 1984
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1984 (application for a well licence)
- Date
- 1984
- Applicant
- Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
- Application Number
- 840466
- Hearing Panel
- Berndtsson NG
- Sharp KG
- Vrskovy MJ
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Rycroft field
- Well licence
- Agricultural land
- Bluesky Fm
- Charlie Lake Fm
- Contamination
- Environmental impact
- Locating
- NTS 83M
- Oil producing
- Target area
- Water supply
- Notes
- ERCB Examiners report E84-17 on application No. 840466 for a well licence to drill a well in the Rycroft field in LSD 14-16-77-5 W6M to obtain production from the Bluesky and Charlie Lake formations.
- Interveners
- Rukavina, J.
- Location
- 14-16-077-05W6
Decision 85-15
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1680
- Applicant
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
- Application Number
- 840227
- Title
- Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1985 (commercial oil sands project (phase 1) Lindbergh sector)
- Date
- 1985
- Title
- Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1985 (commercial oil sands project (phase 1) Lindbergh sector)
- Date
- 1985
- Applicant
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
- Application Number
- 840227
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Strom NA
- Bellows LA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Carbon dioxide injection
- Cyclic steam injection
- Elk Point area
- Elk Point project
- In situ
- Industrial plant
- Lindbergh field
- Steam flooding
- Steam injection
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Thermal recovery
- Air quality
- Bitumen
- Cleaning
- Contamination
- Disposal well
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- ID-80-02
- Hydrogen sulphide
- Land reclamation
- Land use
- Locating
- Monitoring
- NTS 73E
- Noise (sound)
- Pollution
- Recovery factor
- Recycling
- Socio-economic effect
- Waste disposal
- Water disposal
- Water supply
- Water well
- Well spacing
- Legal References
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
- Notes
- Decision D85-15 (with addendum) on application No. 840227 for approval of phase 1 of a three phase commercial oil sands project (Elk Point project) in Lindbergh sector of Cold Lake oil sands deposits, consisting of 13-well cyclic steam and steam flood stimulation project on 2 Hectare well spacing and a 640 CU. M./day bitumen cleaning plant (TP.54-46, R.5-7 W4M); Board hearing 1985-01-08/09/12/15-18/21-23
- Interveners
- Kadutski, D.
- Kadutski, C.
- Kadutski, M.
- Elk Point Surface Rights Association
- Keith, L.
- Group of Elk Point -Lindbergh Area Residents
- Town of Elk Point
- County of St. Paul
- Westmin Resources Limited
Decision 85-17
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1495
- Applicant
- ESSO Resources Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 850037
- Title
- Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1985 (to proceed with phases V and VI of the Cold Lake project)
- Date
- 1985
- Title
- Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1985 (to proceed with phases V and VI of the Cold Lake project)
- Date
- 1985
- Applicant
- ESSO Resources Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 850037
- Hearing Panel
- Strom NA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- No Hearing
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Cold Lake heavy oil project
- Heavy oil project
- In situ
- Clearwater Fm
- Expansion
- NTS 73L
- Recycling
- Socio-economic effect
- Water supply
- Water use
- Well spacing
- Notes
- Decision D85-17 on application No. 850037 by ESSO for approval to proceed with phases V and VI of the Cold Lake project in TP.64-66, R.3-4 W4M; no hearing; see also ERCB report 79-E for Decision on original application, report 81-C on application to use natural gas as make-up fuel, Decision D83-21 on application to allow for phased development, and Decision D84-16 on application to proceed with phases 3 & 4
Decision 85-36
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision983
- Applicant
- Murphy Oil Company Limited.
- Application Number
- 841338
- Title
- Decision on application by Murphy Oil Company Limited, 1985 (commercial oil sands project phase 1, Lindbergh sector)
- Date
- 1985
- Title
- Decision on application by Murphy Oil Company Limited, 1985 (commercial oil sands project phase 1, Lindbergh sector)
- Date
- 1985
- Applicant
- Murphy Oil Company Limited.
- Application Number
- 841338
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Bellows LA
- Strom NA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Cyclic steam injection
- Elk Point area
- In situ
- Lindbergh area
- Lindbergh thermal recovery project
- Steam injection
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Thermal recovery
- Agricultural land
- Air quality
- Community relations
- Directional well
- Drilling fluid
- Drilling Waste disposal
- Electric power distribution
- Environmental impact
- Land reclamation
- NTS 73L
- Recovery factor
- Right of way
- Transmission corridor
- Waste disposal
- Water supply
- Legal References
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
- Notes
- Decision D85-36 on application No. 841338 for approval in principle of the Lindbergh thermal recovery project (being an expansion of an experimental scheme operating in section 13-58-5 W4M) and to construct and operate phase 1 to recover crude bitumen from the Cold Lake oil sands deposits using a cyclic steam stimulation recovery technique; Board hearing 1985-06-18 and 1985-07-03/04/05
- Interveners
- Opanavicius, A.
- Elk Point Surface Rights Association
- Elizabeth Metis Settlement Association No.9 and Federation of Metis Settlements
- Town of Elk Point
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Alberta Municipal Affairs
Decision 85-39
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision971
- Applicant
- Alberta Energy Company Limited
- Cominco Chemicals and Fertilizers
- Application Number
- 850703
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Cominco Chemicals and Fertilizers, 1985 (industrial development permit to manufacture ammonia)
- Date
- 1985
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Cominco Chemicals and Fertilizers, 1985 (industrial development permit to manufacture ammonia)
- Date
- 1985
- Application Number
- 850703
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Bohme VE
- Homeniuk TF
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Ammonia
- Chemical plant
- Industrial development permit
- Red Deer area
- Agricultural land
- Air quality
- Capitalized cost
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Hydrogen
- Marketing
- Natural gas - fuel
- Nitrogen
- NTS 83A
- Plant location
- Raw material
- Socio-economic effect
- Waste water
- Water supply
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S30
- Notes
- Decision D85-39 on application No. 850703 for industrial development permit authorizing the use of hydrogen as raw material and natural gas as fuel to produce anhydrous ammonia at a plant to be constructed near Joffre (TP.39, R.22-23, W4M).
- Interveners
- Chessor, D.
- Preserve Agricultural Land
- Canadian Fertilizers Ltd.
- The Alberta Gas Ethylene Co. Ltd.
Decision 85-42
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision968
- Applicant
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 850428
- 850798
- Title
- Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Commercial oil sands project and water disposal scheme Lindbergh sector)
- Date
- 1985
- Title
- Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Commercial oil sands project and water disposal scheme Lindbergh sector)
- Date
- 1985
- Applicant
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 850428
- 850798
- Hearing Panel
- Strom NA
- Bellows LA
- Homeniuk TF
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Cyclic steam injection
- Dome Lindbergh project
- In situ
- Lindbergh area
- Produced water
- Steam injection
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Thermal recovery
- Water disposal
- Agricultural land
- Air quality
- Cummings Fm
- Directional well
- Disposal well
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Groundwater
- Land reclamation
- Locating
- Monitoring
- NTS 73E
- Noise (sound)
- Planning
- Pollution
- Recycling
- Waste disposal
- Water producing
- Water supply
- Legal References
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
- Notes
- Decision D85-42 on application No. 850428 and 850798 by Dome on behalf of itself & its partners Sulpetro and CNG producing Company for a commercial oil sands deposit in TP.53-56, R.4-6, W4M and water disposal scheme, Lindbergh sector (being an expansion of current experimental project to commercial scale); Board hearing 1984-11-04/05/06
- Interveners
- Miller, L.
- Kozicky, C.
- Melnyk, A.
- Elk Point Surface Rights Association
- Town of Elk Point
- Westmin Resources Limited
Decision 85-45
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision904
- Applicant
- Suncor Inc.
- Application Number
- 850952
- Title
- Decision on application by Suncor Inc., 1985 (commercial oil sands project Primrose sector)
- Date
- 1985
- Title
- Decision on application by Suncor Inc., 1985 (commercial oil sands project Primrose sector)
- Date
- 1985
- Applicant
- Suncor Inc.
- Application Number
- 850952
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Bellows LA
- Fox EG
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Cyclic steam injection
- In situ
- Steam injection
- Suncor Primrose-Clearwater project
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Thermal recovery
- Clearwater Fm
- Directional well
- NTS 73L
- Recovery
- Water supply
- Water use
- Legal References
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
- Notes
- Decision D85-45 on application No. 850952 by Suncor on behalf of itself, Alberta energy Co., Canadian Hunter and Pangaea, for a commercial oil sands project to recover crude bitumen resources from the Cold Lake Clearwater oil sands deposit using a cyclic steam stimulation recovery (TP 67-68, R 2-3, W4M).
- Interveners
- The Town of Cold Lake
- Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
- Cold Lake First Nations
Decision 86-10|86-10 Addendum
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision625
- Applicant
- PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 860168
- Title
- Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1986 (commercial oil sands project Lindbergh and Frog Lake sectors) (and addendum)
- Date
- 1986
- Title
- Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1986 (commercial oil sands project Lindbergh and Frog Lake sectors) (and addendum)
- Date
- 1986
- Applicant
- PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 860168
- Hearing Type
- Board
- No Hearing
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Cyclic steam injection
- Elk Point area
- In situ
- Lindbergh area
- Lindbergh Frog Lake project
- Steam injection
- Oil sands project
- Thermal recovery
- Air quality
- Cummings Fm
- Environmental impact
- Noise (sound)
- North Saskatchewan River
- NTS 73E
- Pollution control
- Recycling
- Socio-economic effect
- Water disposal
- Water supply
- Water use
- Well spacing
- Legal References
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
- Notes
- Decision D86-10 (with addendum) on application No. 860168 to construct and operate phase 1 of a proposed 3-phase commercial project to recover bitumen from Cummings FM of Cold Lake oil sands deposit in Lindbergh & Frog Lake sectors (TP.55-56, R.5-6, W4M) by cyclic steam injection and to include existing experimental scheme in commercial project; resulted in Order No. Misc 8501A and approval No. 5047; no hearing
Decision 87-21
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision169
- Applicant
- Skimmer Oil Separators Ltd.
- Application Number
- 871196
- Title
- Decision on application by Skimmer Oil Separators Ltd., 1987 (waste processing and disposal facility Lloydminster field)
- Date
- 1987
- Title
- Decision on application by Skimmer Oil Separators Ltd., 1987 (waste processing and disposal facility Lloydminster field)
- Date
- 1987
- Applicant
- Skimmer Oil Separators Ltd.
- Application Number
- 871196
- Hearing Panel
- Goodman CJ
- Prince JP
- Brushett ER
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Oil waste
- Waste disposal
- Waste oil recovery
- Waste treatment
- Groundwater
- Environmental impact
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 73E
- Water supply
- Truck
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.002
- Notes
- Decision D87-21 on application No. 871196 for approval to construct and operate a waste processing and disposal facility in LSD 14-31-51-2 W4M; exhibits D3-D6 consisting of four samples from geology pit and field tank are filed in the library (kept in locked drawer that houses the ARC Documents)
- Interveners
- Blair, H.
- Blair, L.
- Corr, H.
- Marwayne Support Group
- Behnke, B.
- Butler, L.
- Cooke, R.
- Hines, L.
- Inge, S.
- Johnson, A.
- Johnson, R.
- Kent, T.
- Luchyk, B.
- Nohnychuk, R.
- Taylor, L.
- Young, R.
- Lloydminster Heavy Crude Services Ltd.
- Sunrise Well Services Ltd.
- Ro-Vac Pump Truck Services
- Temor Oil Services
- Home Oil Co. Ltd.
- Wilson, W.H.
- Location
- 14-31-051-02W4
Decision 88-11
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision166
- Applicant
- Cimarron Petroleum Ltd.
- ICG Resources Ltd.
- Application Number
- 880035
- 880036
- 880037
- Title
- Decision on application by Cimarron Petroleum Ltd. and ICG Resources Ltd., 1988 (well licences)
- Date
- 1988
- Title
- Decision on application by Cimarron Petroleum Ltd. and ICG Resources Ltd., 1988 (well licences)
- Date
- 1988
- Applicant
- Cimarron Petroleum Ltd.
- ICG Resources Ltd.
- Application Number
- 880035
- 880036
- 880037
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Morin EJ
- Prince JP
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Sour gas
- Well licence
- Directional well
- Elkton Fm
- Emergency procedure
- Environmental impact
- Gas well
- Land use
- Land value
- NTS 82O
- Residential building
- Rundle Gp
- Safety
- Urban development
- Water supply
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Notes
- Decision D88-11 on application No. 880035 (Cimarron) for a licence to drill a well from a surface location in LSD 13-15-26-1 W5M to obtain production from the Elkton member of the Rundle FM; on application No. 880036 (ICG resources) for a licence to drill a well in LSD 6-10-26-1 W5M to obtain production from the Elkton FM; on application No. 880037 (ICG resources) for a licence to drill a well in LSD 14-10-26-1 W5M to obtain production from the Elkton FM.
- Interveners
- The Niedzwiecki Family
- Niedzwiecki, S.E.
- C.B. Stickle Group
- Stickle, B.A.
- Ammerati, V.
- Triple Five Corporation Ltd.
- City of Calgary
- Calgary Regional Planning Commission
- Location
- 13-15-026-01W5
- 06-10-026-01W5
- 14-10-026-01W5
Decision 89-AA
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision136
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Alberta. Dept. of the Environment
- Title
- Water recycle guidelines and reporting water use information for in situ oil sands facilities in Alberta
- Date
- 1989
- Title
- Water recycle guidelines and reporting water use information for in situ oil sands facilities in Alberta
- Date
- 1989
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Recycling
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Waste water
- Water
- Water conservation
- Water quality
- Water resource
- Water supply
- Water treating
- Alberta
- Monitoring
- Procedure
- Regulation
- Research and development
- Notes
- see also ERCB IL 89-5