43 records – page 1 of 3.

Decision 78-18

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2102
Applicant
Star-Key Mines Ltd.
Application Number
780160
Title
Decision on application by Star-Key Mines Ltd., 1978 (amendment of mining system and opening of three new entries of mine No. 1626 St. Albert area)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Star-Key Mines Ltd., 1978 (amendment of mining system and opening of three new entries of mine No. 1626 St. Albert area)
Date
1978
Applicant
Star-Key Mines Ltd.
Application Number
780160
Hearing Panel
Strom NA
Duncan NJ
Jenkins D
Harrington D
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Coal
Descriptors
Coal mine
Coal project
St. Albert area
Underground mining
Benefit cost analysis
Coal reserve
Edmonton Fm
Environmental impact
Land reclamation
Longwall mining
Mine design
NTS 83H
Subsidence
Truck
Water quality
Notes
Decision 78-18 on application No. 780160 to amend permit No. C 76-70 to change present underground mining system for Star-Key mine (No. 1626) including 3 new entrances to underground workings (TP.54-55, R.24-25, W4M); Examiners hearing 1978-06-14/22
Interveners
The City of St. Albert
The Consumer Association of Canada (Alta.)
Less detail

Decision 78-AA

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2334
Applicant
Forestburg Collieries Limited
Alberta. Dept. of the Environment
Application Number
9903
Title
Decision on application by Forestburg Collieries Limited, 1978 (permit to develop and a licence to commence mining operations at a mine site near Halkirk)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Forestburg Collieries Limited, 1978 (permit to develop and a licence to commence mining operations at a mine site near Halkirk)
Date
1978
Applicant
Forestburg Collieries Limited
Alberta. Dept. of the Environment
Application Number
9903
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Coal
Descriptors
Coal mine
Coal project
Forestburg South mine project
Surface mining
Benefit cost analysis
Bituminous coal
Coal reserve
Environmental impact
Land reclamation
Mine design
Mine safety
NTS 83A
Overburden ratio
Reclamation
Socio-economic effect
Soil conservation
Water quality
Legal References
Coal Conservation Act S10
Coal Conservation Act S11
Notes
ERCB report 78-AA on application No. 9903 to develop and operate coal mine of the south SIDE of the Battle River (TP.39-40, R.15-16, W4M) to replace coal production from the DIPLOMAT mine site No. 1578 to ensure an ADEQUATE supply for APL'S generating station; Board hearing 1978-01-24/25 permit No. C 78-12 licence No. C 78-13
Less detail

Decision 79-A

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2344
Applicant
Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
Application Number
780318
Title
Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, part 8)
Date
1979
Title
Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, part 8)
Date
1979
Applicant
Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
Application Number
780318
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Evans RG
Kupchanko EE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Great Canadian Oil Sands
Oil mining
Suncor plant
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Air quality
Athabasca River
Benefit cost analysis
Delayed coking
Effluent
Emission
Environmental impact
Expansion
Material balance
Mine design
NTS 74E
Open pit mining
Overburden ratio
Plant design
Pollution control
Recovery factor
Socio-economic effect
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Surface mining
Upgrading
Waste disposal
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S43
Notes
ERCB report 79-A on application No. 780318 to amend approval No. 1944 to modify and expand existing facilities located in TP.92-93, R.10, W4M; Board hearing 1979-01-30/31
Less detail

Decision 80-E

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2324
Applicant
Union Oil Company of Canada Limited
Rescon Coal Holdings Ltd.
Application Number
790729
Title
Decision on application by Union Oil Company of Canada Limited and Rescon Coal Holdings Ltd. Obed Marsh coal project Hinton
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Union Oil Company of Canada Limited and Rescon Coal Holdings Ltd. Obed Marsh coal project Hinton
Date
1980
Applicant
Union Oil Company of Canada Limited
Rescon Coal Holdings Ltd.
Application Number
790729
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Coal
Descriptors
Coal mine
Coal preparation plant
Coal project
Hinton area
Obed Marsh coal project
Obed Mountain coal field
Surface mining
Benefit cost analysis
Bituminous coal
Coal reserve
Drainage
Environmental impact
Land reclamation
Mine design
NTS 83F
Open pit mining
Overburden ratio
Reclamation
Settling pond
Socio-economic effect
Strip mining
Tailings
Thermal coal
Waste disposal
Water quality
Legal References
Coal Conservation Act S10
Coal Conservation Act S23
Notes
ERCB report 80-E on application No. 790729 to develop surface coal mine in TP.52-55, R.23-25, W5 and a coal processing plant in TP.52-53, R.23-24, W5; Board hearing 1980-02-25/26/27
Less detail

Decision 81-09

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1758
Applicant
Panther Resources Ltd.
Application Number
800651
Title
Examiners report on application by Panther Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas processing plant)
Date
1981
Title
Examiners report on application by Panther Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas processing plant)
Date
1981
Applicant
Panther Resources Ltd.
Application Number
800651
Hearing Panel
Evans RG
Pearson DG
Remmer WG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Duhamel field
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Acidification
Air quality
Economic analysis
Emission
Environmental impact
Flare
Hydrogen sulphide removal
Livestock
Locating
Monitoring
NTS 83A
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
ERCB Examiners report No. E81-9 on application No. 800651 to construct and operate a sour gas processing plant southwest of Camrose in LSD 5-31-45-20 W4M; Examiners' hearing 81-01-15 adjourned to 81-03-17/18/19
Interveners
City of Camrose
County of Camrose No.22
Cordes, K.
Calvin, G.
Noden, D.
Luz, W.
Klapstein, W.
Sauer, J.
Sauer, K.
Weyhausen, H.
Weyga Farming Ltd.
Watterodt, T.
Watterodt, W.
Watterodt, M.
Schroeder, D.
Schroeder, K.
Schroeder, P.
Schroeder, H.
Graefin Von Helldorf, V.
Schroeser, I.
Baumgarten, E.
Braim, B.
Krangnes, D.
Snider, R.
Tate, R.
Less detail

Decision 81-10

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1998
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Application Number
800853
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene)
Date
1981
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Application Number
800853
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Webber HJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Ethylene
Industrial development permit
Red Deer area
Air quality
Benefit cost analysis
Design criteria
Emission
Environmental impact
Ethane
Ethane - raw material
Forecasting
Land use
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
Noise (sound)
NTS 83A
Pollution
Raw material
Socio-economic effect
Supply (economics)
Water
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 81-10 on application No. 800853 to use ethane as feedstock and natural gas as fuel to manufacture ethylene in plant to be constructed (unit 3) adjacent to present facilities (units 1&2) near Joffre (TP.38, R.25, W4M); Board hearing 1981-04-07/08
Interveners
Preserve Agricultural Land
Red Deer Regional Planning Commission
Hainsworth, B.W.
Chessor, D.
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Esso Chemical Canada
Du Pont Canada Inc.
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
NOVA, AN ALBERTA CORPORATION
Shell Canada Limited
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Esso Resources Canada Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Sulpetro Limited
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 81-16

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1992
Applicant
Nova, an Alberta Corporation
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
800910
Title
Decision on application by Nova, an Alberta Corporation and Shell Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Nova, an Alberta Corporation and Shell Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
Date
1981
Applicant
Nova, an Alberta Corporation
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
800910
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Webber HJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Ethylene homopolymer
Industrial development permit
Red Deer area
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Ethylene - raw material
Land use
Locating
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
Noise (sound)
NTS 83A
Plant location
Pollution
Socio-economic effect
Supply (economics)
Water quality
Water supply
Notes
Decision 81-16 on application No. 800910 to use ethylene as feedstock and gas as fuel to manufacture polyethylene at a LINEAR low-density polyethylene plant to be constructed on the site of Alberta gas ethylene'S existing ethylene plant east of Red Deer (TP.38-40, R.23-27, W4M).
Interveners
Preserve Agricultural Land
Alberta Institute of Agrologists Red Deer Branch
F.E.M. Farms
Hainsworth, J.W.
Federation of Alberta Naturalists Land Use Committee
Red Deer Regional Planning Commission
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Du Pont Canada Inc.
Esso Chemical Canada
Less detail

Decision 82-21

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2057
Applicant
Inverness Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
810434
820033
Title
Decision on application by Inverness Petroleum Ltd., 1982 (approval of a gas processing plant and related gas gathering facilities in the Silver Valley area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Inverness Petroleum Ltd., 1982 (approval of a gas processing plant and related gas gathering facilities in the Silver Valley area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Inverness Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
810434
820033
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Gas processing plant
Gathering line
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Agricultural land
Air quality
Deposition
Emission
Environment protection
Environmental impact
Flare
Health
Livestock
Mathematical model
NTS 84D
Safety
Selenium
Soil analysis
Sulphur dioxide
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 82-21 on application No. 810434 to construct a gas plant in LSD 13-27-81-11 W6M and on application No. 820033 for related gas gathering and pipeline facilities; Board hearing 1982-03-22/23
Interveners
Josephine Environmental Protection Group
Rehaume AB
Umbach JE
Scobel K
Baxter DM
Travis KR
Phillips BM
Weiss K
Brown HD
Harpe R
Nagel H
National Farmers Union
Staton ME
Hendricks J
Johnstone AH
Alberta Environment
Liu CS
Defir J
Graveland D
Less detail

Decision 83-A

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2466
Applicant
McLeod River Coal Ltd.
Application Number
820294
Title
Decision on application by McLeod River Coal Ltd., 1983 (McLeod River coal project, Hinton)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by McLeod River Coal Ltd., 1983 (McLeod River coal project, Hinton)
Date
1983
Applicant
McLeod River Coal Ltd.
Application Number
820294
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Strom NA
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Coal
Descriptors
Coal mine
Coal preparation plant
Coal project
Coalspur coal field
Hinton area
McLeod River coal project
Surface mining
Air quality
Bituminous coal
Capitalized cost
Coal reserve
Cost analysis
Design criteria
Drainage
Dust control
Economic analysis
Employment
Environment protection
Environmental impact
Groundwater
Land reclamation
Land use
Manpower
Marketing
Mine design
NTS 83F
Open pit mining
Operating cost
Overburden ratio
Railroad
Reforestation
Socio-economic effect
Soil conservation
Tailings
Tailings - storage
Terminal facility
Thermal coal
Transportation corridor
Waste disposal
Water quality
Legal References
Coal Conservation Act S10
Coal Conservation Act S23
Notes
ERCB report D83-A on application No. 820294 to develop a surface coal mine in TP.49-51, R.21-23, W5 to extract high volatile C bituminous coal from NW portion of Coalspur coal field and to construct a coal processing plant in TP.51-52, R23-24, W5; Board hearing 1982-08-24/25/26/27
Less detail

Decision 83-C

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2435
Applicant
Mercoal Minerals Ltd.
Application Number
820385
Title
Decision on application by Mercoal Minerals Ltd., 1983 (Mercoal coal project)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Mercoal Minerals Ltd., 1983 (Mercoal coal project)
Date
1983
Applicant
Mercoal Minerals Ltd.
Application Number
820385
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Strom NA
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Coal
Descriptors
Alberta Coal Branch
Coal mine
Coal preparation plant
Coal project
Hinton area
Mercoal coal project
Surface mining
Air quality
Benefit cost analysis
Bituminous coal
Coal reserve
Coalspur coal field
Cost analysis
Design criteria
Dust control
Economic analysis
Employment
Environmental impact
Land reclamation
Land use
Mine design
Marketing
NTS 83F
Open pit mining
Overburden ratio
Reforestation
Socio-economic effect
Tailings
Tailings - storage
Thermal coal
Waste disposal
Water quality
Water supply
Legal References
Coal Conservation Act S10
Coal Conservation Act S23
Notes
ERCB report D83-C on application No. 820385 to develop a surface coal mine to produce high volatile C bituminous coal and to construct a coal processing plant, to be located in TP.47-49, R.20-23, W5; Board hearing 1982-11-02/03/04
Less detail

Decision 84-31

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1692
Applicant
Palmer Ranch (1984) Ltd.
Application Number
841040
Title
Decision on application by Palmer Ranch (1984) Ltd., 1984 (industrial development permit to manufacture ammonia)
Date
1984
Title
Decision on application by Palmer Ranch (1984) Ltd., 1984 (industrial development permit to manufacture ammonia)
Date
1984
Applicant
Palmer Ranch (1984) Ltd.
Application Number
841040
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Bohme VE
Homeniuk TF
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Ammonia
Chemical plant
Industrial development permit
Pincher Creek area
Air quality
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Monitoring
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
Pincher Creek gas plant
Pollution control
Socio-economic effect
Waste water
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S30
Notes
Decision D84-31 on application No. 841040 for an IDP to use natural gas to produce anhydrous ammonia in a plant to be constructed on the site of the decommissioned Pincher Creek gas plant; Board hearing 84-12-5/6
Interveners
Pincher Creek and District Economic Board
Gulf Canada Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Ltd.
Western Co-Operative Fertilizers Limited
Oldman River Regional Planning Commission
Pincher Creek Area Environment Association
Municipal District of Pincher Creek No.9
Blood Tribe
Less detail

Decision 85-16

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1678
Applicant
Luchyk (William)
Application Number
850170
Title
Decision on application by Luchyk (William), 1985 (review of Husky Oil Operations Ltd. remedial cementing program)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Luchyk (William), 1985 (review of Husky Oil Operations Ltd. remedial cementing program)
Date
1985
Applicant
Luchyk (William)
Application Number
850170
Hearing Panel
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Abandonment
Descriptors
Cementing
Groundwater
Water pollution
Water quality
Well workover
Wildmere field
Monitoring
NTS 73E
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision D85-16 on application No. 850170 for review of approved Husky oil remedial cementing program for well "Husky et al Wildmere 5C-18-4" S7-4 (W4M) as part of well abandonment program.
Interveners
Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 87-09

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision208
Applicant
Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
Application Number
861041
Title
Decision on application by Norcen Energy Resources Ltd., 1987 (approval of a gas processing plant in the Campbell-Namao field)
Date
1987
Title
Decision on application by Norcen Energy Resources Ltd., 1987 (approval of a gas processing plant in the Campbell-Namao field)
Date
1987
Applicant
Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
Application Number
861041
Hearing Panel
Goodman CJ
Mink FJ
Bruni MJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Campbell Namao field
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Air pollution
Air quality
Citizen participation
Emission
Environmental impact
Health
Locating
Negotiation
Noise (sound)
NTS 73H
Safety
Soil analysis
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision D87-9 on application No. 861041 to construct a gas processing plant in LSD 1-55-25 W4M to process non-associate and solution gas from wells in several fields in the general area; Board hearing 1987-03-17/18/19
Interveners
Rose Ridge Citizens Committee
Blach, W.
Bocock, J.
Pasay, I.
Silito, S.
Sinkovics, A.
Zuidema, P.
Councillor in the Municipal District of Sturgeon #90
MLA for Consistuency of Westlock-Sturgeon
Location
##-01-055-25W4
Less detail

Decision 88-22

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision146
Applicant
Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
Application Number
861041
Title
Decision on application by Norcen Energy Resources Ltd., 1988 (approval of a gas processing facility in the Campbell-Namao field)
Date
1988
Title
Decision on application by Norcen Energy Resources Ltd., 1988 (approval of a gas processing facility in the Campbell-Namao field)
Date
1988
Applicant
Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
Application Number
861041
Hearing Panel
Mink FJ
Bruni MJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Campbell Namao field
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Air pollution
Air quality
Citizen participation
Emission
Environmental impact
Health
Locating
Negotiation
Noise (sound)
NTS 73H
Safety
Soil analysis
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision D88-22 on application No. 861041 to construct a gas processing plant in LSD 1-55-25 W4M to process non-associate and solution gas from well in several fields in the general area; pre-hearing meeting held 1988-09-08.
Interveners
A Group of Area Residents
Blach, W.
Bocok, J.
Mackay, G.
Sinkovics, A.
Councillor in the Municipal District of Sturgeon # 90
MLA for Constitutuency of Westlock- Sturgeon
Location
##-01-055-25W4
Less detail

Decision 89-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision124
Applicant
Strathfield Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
890574
890576
890577
890578
890579
890795
890796
890797
890798
890799
890800
890801
890802
890803
Title
Decision 89-08 : Strathfield Oil and Gas Ltd.: Application for well licences, Provost field
Date
1989
Title
Decision 89-08 : Strathfield Oil and Gas Ltd.: Application for well licences, Provost field
Date
1989
Applicant
Strathfield Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
890574
890576
890577
890578
890579
890795
890796
890797
890798
890799
890800
890801
890802
890803
Hearing Panel
Strom NA
Morin EJ
Langlo CA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Provost field
Well licence
Agricultural land
Air quality
Aquifer
Battery
Communication
Community relations
Cretaceous
Development well
Dina member
Drilling fluid
Drilling waste disposal
Emission
Energy development
Environmental impact
Groundwater
Hydrogen sulphide
Land use
Mannville Gp
NTS 73D
Oil well
Reservoir boundary
Spill
Sulphur dioxide
Water pollution
Water quality
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
ERCB decision D89-8 on applications no. 890574, 890576-890579, 890795-890803 for licences to drill wells all in Tp.37, R.4, W4; Board hearing 1989-06-27/28
Interveners
Hanson, R.
Less detail

Decision 89-AA

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision136
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Alberta. Dept. of the Environment
Title
Water recycle guidelines and reporting water use information for in situ oil sands facilities in Alberta
Date
1989
Title
Water recycle guidelines and reporting water use information for in situ oil sands facilities in Alberta
Date
1989
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Alberta. Dept. of the Environment
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Recycling
Oil sands oil recovery
Waste water
Water
Water conservation
Water quality
Water resource
Water supply
Water treating
Alberta
Monitoring
Procedure
Regulation
Research and development
Notes
see also ERCB IL 89-5
Less detail

Decision 90-04

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision98
Applicant
Power Resource Development Corporation
Application Number
891671
Title
Decision 90-04 : Power Resource Development Corporation : Application for a 18-MW wood-waste-fired electric power plant, Whitecourt area
Date
1990
Title
Decision 90-04 : Power Resource Development Corporation : Application for a 18-MW wood-waste-fired electric power plant, Whitecourt area
Date
1990
Applicant
Power Resource Development Corporation
Application Number
891671
Hearing Panel
Prince JP
Fox EG
Sharp KG
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Electric power
Descriptors
Electric power project
Non-utility generation
Whitecourt area
Wood waste
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Industrial waste
NTS 83J
Power system interconnection
Site survey
Socio-economic effect
Water quality
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S12
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
Notes
Decision D90-4 on application No. 891671 to construct and operate an 18-MW wood-waste-fired electric power plant northwest of the Town of Whitecourt and to connect it to the electric system of TransAlta Utilities.
Interveners
Whitecourt Chamber of Commerce
Town of Whitecourt
Millar Western Industries Ltd.
Whitecourt Environment Society
Friends of the Athabasca
Less detail

Decision 90-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision85
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
Application Number
890971
890969
891504
891505
891506
891478
891479
891480
891481
891482
891568
891569
891570
891571
900404
891483
891290
900236
891047
891757
891805
891804
891803
891703
891802
Title
Decision 90-08 : Shell Canada Limited and Husky Oil Operations Ltd.: Application for Caroline Beaverhill Lake gas development
Date
1990
Title
Decision 90-08 : Shell Canada Limited and Husky Oil Operations Ltd.: Application for Caroline Beaverhill Lake gas development
Date
1990
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
Application Number
890971
890969
891504
891505
891506
891478
891479
891480
891481
891482
891568
891569
891570
891571
900404
891483
891290
900236
891047
891757
891805
891804
891803
891703
891802
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Mink FJ
Bietz BF
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Caroline field
Caroline gas project
Energy development
Gas pipeline
Gas processing plant
Pipeline construction permit
Product pipeline
Sour gas
Sulphur recovery plant
Bearberry field
Benefit cost analysis
Carbon dioxide
Capitalized cost
Claus process
Conservation
Economic analysis
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
ID-81-03
ID-88-01
Feasibility
Forecasting
Groundwater
Nitrogen oxide
Noise (sound)
NTS 82O
NTS 83B
Operating cost
Petroleum conservation
Public interest
Reliability
Safety
Socio-economic effect
Soil conservation
Soil pollution
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Water disposal
Water pollution
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S4
Notes
Decision D90-8 on proceeding No. 890971 and on applications by Shell, Husky and associated parties for production, processing and transportation facilities for sour gas reserves in the Caroline Beaverhill Lake area (all in TP.31-36, R.3-10 W5M); Board hearing commenced 1990-04-17 and continued to 1990-05-10 with final argument 1990-05-28/29
Interveners
Federated Pipe Lines Ltd.
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Altana Exploration Company
ATCOR Ltd.
Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
Gulf Canada Resources Limited
Mobil Oil Canada
NOVA Corporation of Alberta
Numac Oil & Gas Ltd.
Union Pacific Resources Inc.
CN Rail
CP Rail
Alberta Fish and Game Association
Pollution Sub-Committee of the Public Advisory Committees - Environment Council of Alberta
Bauman, J.
Bauman, L.
Brown, R.
McCormick, H.
Brunner, J.
Brunner, L.
Heggie, R.
Burnstick Lake Cottage Owners' Association
Caroline Advisory Board
Caroline & District Chamber of Commerce
Concerned Residents Action Group
County of Mountain View No. 17
Diamond J. Industries Ltd.
Harris, D.
Harris, M.
Hermann, J.
Jans, E.
Jans, B.
Kostuch , M.
Rocky Veterinary Clinic Ltd.
Macklin, J.
Macklin, B.
Mountain View Land Holders Group
Olds& District Chamber of Commerce
Preservation of Agriculture and Living Space Society
Rocky Mountain House & District Chamber of Commerce
Roth, L.
Roth, S.
Saunders, D.
447 Area Residents
Sundre & District Chamber of Commerce
Town of Innisfail
Town of Sundre
Town of Rocky Mountain House
Village of Caroline
Wolf, R.E.
Less detail

Decision 95-16

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2555
Applicant
High Bullen Energy Ltd.
Application Number
951628
Title
Examiner report on application by High Bullen Energy Ltd., 1995 (application for a well licence Ferrier Area)
Date
1995
Title
Examiner report on application by High Bullen Energy Ltd., 1995 (application for a well licence Ferrier Area)
Date
1995
Applicant
High Bullen Energy Ltd.
Application Number
951628
Hearing Panel
Lillo HO
Asgar-Deen ML
Willard RJ
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Well licence
Ferrier area
Environmental impact
Groundwater
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
Examiners report on application by High Bullen Energy Ltd. for a well licence in the Ferrier Area, at Lsd 14 Sec 17 Twp 38 Rge 6 W5M to re-enter the existing abandoned well ESSO et al Ferrier 14-17-38-6 to produce sweet gas from the Rock Creek Formation through the existing cased wellbore.
Interveners
Krabben, B.
Krabben, F.
Location
14-14-038-06W5
Less detail

Decision 97-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2856
Applicant
CanNat Resources Inc.
Application Number
970189
Title
Examiner report on application by CanNat Resources Inc., 1997 (application for two well licences Joarcam Area)
Date
1997
Title
Examiner report on application by CanNat Resources Inc., 1997 (application for two well licences Joarcam Area)
Date
1997
Applicant
CanNat Resources Inc.
Application Number
970189
Hearing Panel
Bruni MJ
Skappak DL
Hill CD
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Drainage
Environmental impact
Groundwater
Joarcam field
Noise (sound)
NTS 83H
Odor
Surface water
Water disposal
Water pollution
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S11
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
EUB Examiners Report E97-03 on application no. 970189 by CanNat Resources for licences to drill two wells from a single surface location at Lsd 2 Sec 26 Twp 50 Rge 22 W4M to obtain production from the Viking Fm.
Interveners
Olsen Barry and Carol
Read DL
Approval
Approved
Location
02-26-050-22W4
Less detail

43 records – page 1 of 3.