Narrow Results By
Applicant
- Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited 1
- Artemis Exploration Inc. 1
- Avalanche Energy Ltd. 1
- BP Exploration Canada Limited 1
- Boonstra 1
- Bryzgorni 1
- Cabre Exploration Ltd 1
- Calgary Power Ltd. 1
- CanNat Resources Inc. 1
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency 2
- Cardinal River Coals Ltd. 2
- Compton Petroleum Corporation 1
Decision 76-12
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2152
- Applicant
- Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
- Application Number
- 9162
- 9219
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited, 1976 (Edson and Foothills extensions)
- Date
- 1976
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited, 1976 (Edson and Foothills extensions)
- Date
- 1976
- Applicant
- Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
- Application Number
- 9162
- 9219
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- DeSorcy GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Pipelines
- Descriptors
- Edson area
- Gas pipeline
- Pipeline construction permit
- NTS 83F
- NTS 83K
- NTS 83M
- NTS 83N
- Pipeline crossing
- River
- Water pollution
- Notes
- Decision 76-12 on application No. 9162 (Edson extension) and No. 9219 (Foothills extension) to construct pipelines for the transmission of natural gas; Board hearing 1976-06-17/18/21; see also final Decision 77-07
Decision 78-02
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2118
- Applicant
- BP Exploration Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 770629
- Title
- Decision on application by BP Exploration Canada Limited, 1978 (licence to drill a well in the Chestermere Lake area)
- Date
- 1978
- Title
- Decision on application by BP Exploration Canada Limited, 1978 (licence to drill a well in the Chestermere Lake area)
- Date
- 1978
- Applicant
- BP Exploration Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 770629
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- DeSorcy GJ
- Manyluk AF
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Chestermere Lake area
- Well licence
- Blowout preventer
- Casing (well)
- Contamination
- Elkton Fm
- Emergency procedure
- Environmental impact
- Geologic interpretation
- Land value
- Locating
- NTS 82P
- Oil producing
- Residential building
- Safety
- Water pollution
- Notes
- Decision 78-2 on application No. 770629 for a licence to drill a well in LSD 6-15-24-28 W4M to evaluate and obtain production from the Elkton FM; Board hearing 1977-10-06; adjourned to 1977-11-09
- Interveners
- The Summer Village of Chestermere Leake
- Comport Industries Ltd.
- Argyle Management Ltd.
- Scott, J.
- Scott, C.
- Anderson, G.
- Location
- 06-15-024-28W4
Decision 81-06
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2002
- Applicant
- Calgary Power Ltd.
- Application Number
- 800276
- Title
- Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1981 (alternative cooling studies - Wabamun power plant)
- Date
- 1981
- Title
- Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1981 (alternative cooling studies - Wabamun power plant)
- Date
- 1981
- Applicant
- Calgary Power Ltd.
- Application Number
- 800276
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- Goodman CJ
- Kupchanko EE
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Utilities
- Category
- Electric power
- Descriptors
- Cooling system
- Cooling tower
- Electric power project
- Eutrophication
- Lake Wabamun
- Pollution control
- Wabamun power plant
- Waste heat
- Water pollution
- Weed control
- Comparison
- Environmental impact
- NTS 83G
- Plant nutrition
- Waste water
- Notes
- Decision on application pursuant to stipulation under approval No. HE 7606 for submission of documents relating to thermal discharge into Lake Wabamun (TP.53, R.4 W5M); Board hearing 1980-09-30 & 1981-01-13/14/15/16
- Interveners
- Summer Villages of Point Alison and Kapasiwin and Village Residents
- Village of Wabumun
- Lake Wabumun Preservation Association
- Gorham, P.R.
Decision 82-12
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2066
- Applicant
- ESSO Resources Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 810520
- Title
- Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1982 (Quirk Creek gas processing plant)
- Date
- 1982
- Title
- Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1982 (Quirk Creek gas processing plant)
- Date
- 1982
- Applicant
- ESSO Resources Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 810520
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- Strom NA
- Evans RG
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Gas processing plant
- Moose field
- Quirk Creek plant
- Sour gas
- Whiskey field
- Air pollution
- Air quality
- Emergency procedure
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- ID-80-02
- IL-71-29
- IL-80-24
- Expansion
- Hydrogen sulphide
- Injection
- Monitoring
- NTS 82J
- Pollution control
- Procedure
- Sulphur dioxide
- Sulphur recovery
- Underground
- Waste disposal
- Water pollution
- Legal References
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S2
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S4
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Notes
- Decision 82-12 on application No. 810520 to utilize spare plant capacity to process sour gas reserves from Moose and Whiskey fields at the Quirk Creek gas plant located in the south half of section 4-21-4 W5M; Board hearing 1981-11-04/05/06/23/24/25/26 and 1981-12-14/15/16/17/18 and 1982-01-05/06; see also related Decision D82-3 on Jumping Pound gas plant and ERCB report 82-E for Decisions on related pipeline applications by Shell and Decision D83-8 for local interveners cost awards; see also related report 82-D
- Interveners
- Shell Canada Resources Limited
- Hanen, Z.
- Rumsey Ranches
- Russell, A.
- Canadian Wildlife Federation
- Wolf, R.E.
Decision 82-32
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1120
- Applicant
- Voyager Petroleums Limited
- Application Number
- 820693
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Voyager Petroleums Limited, 1982 (gas processing plant Killam north field)
- Date
- 1982
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Voyager Petroleums Limited, 1982 (gas processing plant Killam north field)
- Date
- 1982
- Applicant
- Voyager Petroleums Limited
- Application Number
- 820693
- Hearing Panel
- Edgecombe RW
- Pearson DG
- Remmer WG
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Gas processing plant
- Killam north field
- Sour gas
- Contamination
- Emergency procedure
- Environmental impact
- Flare
- Gathering line
- Groundwater
- Iron sponge process
- NTS 73D
- Pipeline corrosion
- Safety
- Waste disposal
- Water pollution
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Notes
- ERCB Examiners report E82-32 on application No. 820693 to construct & operate a gas sweetening facility at Voyager's compressor station located in the SW quarter of section 5-45-12 W4M.
- Interveners
- Wylie, D.
- Bricker, L.
- Bricker, Mrs.
Decision 82-D
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2313
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 810520
- 810092
- Title
- Sour gas processing in Alberta : a review of evidence presented at recent ERCB hearings respecting the impacts and surveillance of sour gas plants
- Date
- 1982
- Title
- Sour gas processing in Alberta : a review of evidence presented at recent ERCB hearings respecting the impacts and surveillance of sour gas plants
- Date
- 1982
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 810520
- 810092
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Air pollution
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Gas processing
- Nitrogen oxide
- Soil pollution
- Sour gas
- Sulphur
- Sulphur dioxide
- Sulphur dioxide removal
- Sulphur recovery
- Water pollution
- Acidification
- Airborne waste
- Alberta
- Deposition
- Exhaust gas
- Health
- Hydrogen sulphide
- Injection
- Livestock
- Monitoring
- Selenium
- Trace element
- Underground
- Waste disposal
- Notes
- ERCB report 82-D arising from hearing to consider application for sour gas processing at Jumping Pound and Quirk Creek gas plants and pipeline to connect Moose and Whiskey sour gas reserves to Quirk Creek plant. for Decisions on these applications see ERCB Decisions 82-3, 82-12 and report 82-E
Decision 84-A
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1850
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Title
- Report on some trace element studies in the Twin Butte area
- Date
- 1984
- Title
- Report on some trace element studies in the Twin Butte area
- Date
- 1984
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Emission
- Flue gas
- Gas processing plant
- Heavy metal
- Soil pollution
- Sour gas
- Trace element
- Pincher Creek area
- Twin Butte area
- Water pollution
- Waterton area
- Chemical analysis
- NTS 82G
- NTS 82H
- Particulate
- Sampling
- Soil analysis
- Soil survey
- Water analysis
- Notes
- 37 P
Decision 85-16
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1678
- Applicant
- Luchyk (William)
- Application Number
- 850170
- Title
- Decision on application by Luchyk (William), 1985 (review of Husky Oil Operations Ltd. remedial cementing program)
- Date
- 1985
- Title
- Decision on application by Luchyk (William), 1985 (review of Husky Oil Operations Ltd. remedial cementing program)
- Date
- 1985
- Applicant
- Luchyk (William)
- Application Number
- 850170
- Hearing Panel
- Bellows LA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Abandonment
- Descriptors
- Cementing
- Groundwater
- Water pollution
- Water quality
- Well workover
- Wildmere field
- Monitoring
- NTS 73E
- Legal References
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- Decision D85-16 on application No. 850170 for review of approved Husky oil remedial cementing program for well "Husky et al Wildmere 5C-18-4" S7-4 (W4M) as part of well abandonment program.
- Interveners
- Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
Decision 89-08
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision124
- Applicant
- Strathfield Oil and Gas Ltd.
- Application Number
- 890574
- 890576
- 890577
- 890578
- 890579
- 890795
- 890796
- 890797
- 890798
- 890799
- 890800
- 890801
- 890802
- 890803
- Title
- Decision 89-08 : Strathfield Oil and Gas Ltd.: Application for well licences, Provost field
- Date
- 1989
- Title
- Decision 89-08 : Strathfield Oil and Gas Ltd.: Application for well licences, Provost field
- Date
- 1989
- Applicant
- Strathfield Oil and Gas Ltd.
- Application Number
- 890574
- 890576
- 890577
- 890578
- 890579
- 890795
- 890796
- 890797
- 890798
- 890799
- 890800
- 890801
- 890802
- 890803
- Hearing Panel
- Strom NA
- Morin EJ
- Langlo CA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Provost field
- Well licence
- Agricultural land
- Air quality
- Aquifer
- Battery
- Communication
- Community relations
- Cretaceous
- Development well
- Dina member
- Drilling fluid
- Drilling waste disposal
- Emission
- Energy development
- Environmental impact
- Groundwater
- Hydrogen sulphide
- Land use
- Mannville Gp
- NTS 73D
- Oil well
- Reservoir boundary
- Spill
- Sulphur dioxide
- Water pollution
- Water quality
- Well spacing
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Notes
- ERCB decision D89-8 on applications no. 890574, 890576-890579, 890795-890803 for licences to drill wells all in Tp.37, R.4, W4; Board hearing 1989-06-27/28
- Interveners
- Hanson, R.
Decision 90-08
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision85
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
- Application Number
- 890971
- 890969
- 891504
- 891505
- 891506
- 891478
- 891479
- 891480
- 891481
- 891482
- 891568
- 891569
- 891570
- 891571
- 900404
- 891483
- 891290
- 900236
- 891047
- 891757
- 891805
- 891804
- 891803
- 891703
- 891802
- Title
- Decision 90-08 : Shell Canada Limited and Husky Oil Operations Ltd.: Application for Caroline Beaverhill Lake gas development
- Date
- 1990
- Title
- Decision 90-08 : Shell Canada Limited and Husky Oil Operations Ltd.: Application for Caroline Beaverhill Lake gas development
- Date
- 1990
- Application Number
- 890971
- 890969
- 891504
- 891505
- 891506
- 891478
- 891479
- 891480
- 891481
- 891482
- 891568
- 891569
- 891570
- 891571
- 900404
- 891483
- 891290
- 900236
- 891047
- 891757
- 891805
- 891804
- 891803
- 891703
- 891802
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Mink FJ
- Bietz BF
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Caroline field
- Caroline gas project
- Energy development
- Gas pipeline
- Gas processing plant
- Pipeline construction permit
- Product pipeline
- Sour gas
- Sulphur recovery plant
- Bearberry field
- Benefit cost analysis
- Carbon dioxide
- Capitalized cost
- Claus process
- Conservation
- Economic analysis
- Emergency procedure
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- ID-81-03
- ID-88-01
- Feasibility
- Forecasting
- Groundwater
- Nitrogen oxide
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 82O
- NTS 83B
- Operating cost
- Petroleum conservation
- Public interest
- Reliability
- Safety
- Socio-economic effect
- Soil conservation
- Soil pollution
- Sulphur dioxide
- Sulphur recovery
- Water disposal
- Water pollution
- Water quality
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S4
- Notes
- Decision D90-8 on proceeding No. 890971 and on applications by Shell, Husky and associated parties for production, processing and transportation facilities for sour gas reserves in the Caroline Beaverhill Lake area (all in TP.31-36, R.3-10 W5M); Board hearing commenced 1990-04-17 and continued to 1990-05-10 with final argument 1990-05-28/29
- Interveners
- Federated Pipe Lines Ltd.
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
- Altana Exploration Company
- ATCOR Ltd.
- Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
- Gulf Canada Resources Limited
- Mobil Oil Canada
- NOVA Corporation of Alberta
- Numac Oil & Gas Ltd.
- Union Pacific Resources Inc.
- CN Rail
- CP Rail
- Alberta Fish and Game Association
- Pollution Sub-Committee of the Public Advisory Committees - Environment Council of Alberta
- Bauman, J.
- Bauman, L.
- Brown, R.
- McCormick, H.
- Brunner, J.
- Brunner, L.
- Heggie, R.
- Burnstick Lake Cottage Owners' Association
- Caroline Advisory Board
- Caroline & District Chamber of Commerce
- Concerned Residents Action Group
- County of Mountain View No. 17
- Diamond J. Industries Ltd.
- Harris, D.
- Harris, M.
- Hermann, J.
- Jans, E.
- Jans, B.
- Kostuch , M.
- Rocky Veterinary Clinic Ltd.
- Macklin, J.
- Macklin, B.
- Mountain View Land Holders Group
- Olds& District Chamber of Commerce
- Preservation of Agriculture and Living Space Society
- Rocky Mountain House & District Chamber of Commerce
- Roth, L.
- Roth, S.
- Saunders, D.
- 447 Area Residents
- Sundre & District Chamber of Commerce
- Town of Innisfail
- Town of Sundre
- Town of Rocky Mountain House
- Village of Caroline
- Wolf, R.E.
Decision 97-03
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2856
- Applicant
- CanNat Resources Inc.
- Application Number
- 970189
- Title
- Examiner report on application by CanNat Resources Inc., 1997 (application for two well licences Joarcam Area)
- Date
- 1997
- Title
- Examiner report on application by CanNat Resources Inc., 1997 (application for two well licences Joarcam Area)
- Date
- 1997
- Applicant
- CanNat Resources Inc.
- Application Number
- 970189
- Hearing Panel
- Bruni MJ
- Skappak DL
- Hill CD
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Drainage
- Environmental impact
- Groundwater
- Joarcam field
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 83H
- Odor
- Surface water
- Water disposal
- Water pollution
- Water quality
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S11
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Notes
- EUB Examiners Report E97-03 on application no. 970189 by CanNat Resources for licences to drill two wells from a single surface location at Lsd 2 Sec 26 Twp 50 Rge 22 W4M to obtain production from the Viking Fm.
- Interveners
- Olsen Barry and Carol
- Read DL
- Approval
- Approved
- Location
- 02-26-050-22W4
Decision 97-04
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2857
- Applicant
- Renaissance Energy Ltd.
- Application Number
- 960977
- 1004244
- Title
- Examiner report on application by Renaissance Energy Ltd., 1997 (applications for a well licence and a pipeline permit Provost field)
- Date
- 1997
- Title
- Examiner report on application by Renaissance Energy Ltd., 1997 (applications for a well licence and a pipeline permit Provost field)
- Date
- 1997
- Applicant
- Renaissance Energy Ltd.
- Application Number
- 960977
- 1004244
- Hearing Panel
- Dilay GW
- Marsh RA
- Elle R
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Pipelines
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Environmental impact
- IL-96-09
- IL-96-12
- Gas pipeline
- Gas producing
- Lloydminster Fm
- Locating
- NTS 73D
- Pipeline construction permit
- Provost field
- Route selection
- Soil pollution
- Water pollution
- Water quality
- Well licence
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Pipeline Act Part 4
- Notes
- EUB Examiners report E 97-4 on application no. 960977 for a licence to drill a well in Lsd 16 Sec 10 Twp 36 Rge 3 W4M to obtain sweet natural gas production from the Lloydminster Formation and on application no. 1004244 to construct approximately 1.1 km of 114.3 mm outside diameter pipeline to transport sweet natural gas from the proposed well to an existing pipeline located in Lsd 4 Sec 14 Twp 36 Rge 3 W4M;
- Examiners hearing scheduled for 1997-02-19 postponed and convened 1997-03-05 in Provost Alberta
- Interveners
- Mouly B
- Location
- 16-10-036-03W4
- 04-14-036-03W4
Decision 97-08
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2854
- Applicant
- Cardinal River Coals Ltd.
- TransAlta Utilities Corporation
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
- Application Number
- 960313
- 960314
- 960677
- Title
- Decision 97-08: Cardinal River Coals Ltd. and TransAlta Utilities Corporation : Appplication for EUB-CEAA Joint Review Panel - Cheviot Coal Project, Mountain Park Area, Alberta : Report
- Date
- 1997
- Title
- Decision 97-08: Cardinal River Coals Ltd. and TransAlta Utilities Corporation : Appplication for EUB-CEAA Joint Review Panel - Cheviot Coal Project, Mountain Park Area, Alberta : Report
- Date
- 1997
- Applicant
- Cardinal River Coals Ltd.
- TransAlta Utilities Corporation
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
- Application Number
- 960313
- 960314
- 960677
- Hearing Type
- Joint
- Utilities
- Category
- Coal
- Descriptors
- Coal project
- Cheviot coal project
- Air pollution
- Air quality
- Biological effect
- Coal development policy for Alberta (1976)
- Coal mine
- Coal preparation plant
- Environmental impact
- Mountain Park area
- NTS 83C
- Open pit mining
- Physiological effect
- Socio-economic effect
- Soil pollution
- Transmission line
- Water pollution
- Water quality
- Wildlife
- Legal References
- Alberta Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S47
- Alberta Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S51
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S37
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S40
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S41
- Coal Conservation Act S10
- Coal Conservation Act S23
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S29
- EUB Rules of Practice
- Fisheries Act S35
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S12
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
- Notes
- EUB Decision D97-08 (report of the EUB-CEAA Joint Review Panel) on applications no. 960313, 960314, and 960677 by Cardinal River Coals and TransAlta Utilities Corporation for a proposed coal mine and coal processing plant (Cheviot Coal Project) and associated transmission line and substation (all in township 45-46, range 22-24, W5M); Joint Review Panel public hearing 1997-01-13 through 1997-02-20 and re-opened on 1997-04-01 for one day
- Interveners
- King MA
- Inland Cement
- Weldwood Canada
- Hinton and District Chamber of Commerce
- Alberta Chamber of Commerce
- United Mine Workers of America Local 1656
- Town of Hinton
- Van Binsbergen D
- Breitkreuz C
- Alexis First Nation
- Cadomin Environmental Protection Association
- Alpine Club of Canada
- Alberta Native Plant Council
- Mountain Park Environmental Protection and Heritage Association
- Alberta Wilderness Association
- Jasper Environmental Society
- Pembina Institute for Responsible Development
- Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society
- Gadd B
- Alberta Fish and Game Association
- Trout Unlimited
- Rocky Mountain Ecosystem Coalition
- Western Canada Wilderness Committee
- Smallboy Camp
- Dave family
- Clark JD
- Higgins B
- Approval
- Approved
- Conditions
- Section 35-45-24 W5M and SW quarter of Section 36-45-24 W5M (upper Prospect Creek) are excluded from application no. 960313
- Cardinal Rivers Coals (CRC) shall monitor aquatic ecology of Lac Des Roche
- CRC shall justify the need for each end lake pit and rock drain
- CRC shall carry out long term monitoring of groundwater and surface water quality
- CRC shall maintain 1000 m buffer between mine disturbance and the Cardinal Divide Natural Area wherever practical
- CRC shall monitor impacts on wildlife populations
- CRC shall establish permissable noise levels
- CRC shall establish community liaison groups, in particular with the Mountain Park Association, stewards of the Cardinal Divide Natural Area, the Alexis First Nation, and the Smallboy Camp
Decision 98-08
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2928
- Applicant
- Cabre Exploration Ltd
- Application Number
- 970459
- 1010982
- Title
- Decision 98-08 : Cabre Exploration Ltd,: Application for well licences and reduced oil well spacing, Provost Field
- Date
- 1998
- Title
- Decision 98-08 : Cabre Exploration Ltd,: Application for well licences and reduced oil well spacing, Provost Field
- Date
- 1998
- Applicant
- Cabre Exploration Ltd
- Application Number
- 970459
- 1010982
- Hearing Panel
- Belanger C
- Schnitzler WJ
- Asgar-Deen ML
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Spacing
- Descriptors
- Environmental impact
- Groundwater
- NTS 73D
- Oil producing
- Public consultation
- Water pollution
- Well licence
- Well spacing
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S71
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.030
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S5.190
- Notes
- EUB Decision on application no 970459 and no. 1010982 for licences to drill five wells (all in Twp 38 Rge 3 W4M) and to establish one legal subdivision drilling spacing units;
- Board hearing 1997-12-09/11
- Interveners
- L.H. Ranching Limited
- Hanson R
- Hanson T
- Eastview Farms Limited
- Nelson P.
- Dzurko D
- Alberta Surface Rights Federation
- Approval
- Approved
Decision 2000-49 ADDENDUM
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3297
- Applicant
- Avalanche Energy Ltd.
- Application Number
- 1040201
- 1041048
- 1041629
- 1042292
- Title
- Decision 2000-49 addendum: Avalanche Energy Limited review of applications for a holding, reduced spacing, and well licences, Keoma/Entice area
- Date
- 2000
- Title
- Decision 2000-49 addendum: Avalanche Energy Limited review of applications for a holding, reduced spacing, and well licences, Keoma/Entice area
- Date
- 2000
- Applicant
- Avalanche Energy Ltd.
- Application Number
- 1040201
- 1041048
- 1041629
- 1042292
- Hearing Panel
- McGee TM
- Miller GJ
- Remmer WG
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Belly River Gp
- Drilling spacing unit
- Edmonton Gp
- NTS 82P
- Paskapoo Fm
- Water pollution
- Water quality
- Well licence
- Legal References
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S29
- Notes
- EUB Decision D2000-49 addendum on application by Avalanche to obtain approval for a holding and reduced well spacing, seeking to drill to a density of two wells per pool section for the production of sweet natural gas from the Edmonton and Belly River Groups; also applied to drill three sweet natural gas wells in the Keoma/Entice area. Addendum deals with claim by the Delainey and the Stewart/Petersen families that their water wells were biofouled by Avalanche's activities. The Board concluded that there was no apparent link between the water well problems and drilling and production operations.
- Interveners
- Stewart G
- Peterson T
- Delainey D
- Delainey K
- Approval
- Denied
Decision 2000-59
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3281
- Applicant
- Cardinal River Coals Ltd.
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
- Application Number
- 960313
- 960314
- Title
- Decision on application by Cardinal River Coals Ltd., Cheviot Coal Project, 2000 (report of the EUB-CEAA Joint Review Panel - Cheviot Coal Project, Mountain Park Area, Alberta) (EUB Applications No. 960313 and 960314)
- Date
- 2000
- Title
- Decision on application by Cardinal River Coals Ltd., Cheviot Coal Project, 2000 (report of the EUB-CEAA Joint Review Panel - Cheviot Coal Project, Mountain Park Area, Alberta) (EUB Applications No. 960313 and 960314)
- Date
- 2000
- Application Number
- 960313
- 960314
- Hearing Panel
- Bietz BF
- Miller GJ
- Beck T
- Hearing Type
- Joint
- Utilities
- Category
- Coal
- Descriptors
- Air pollution
- Air quality
- Biological effect
- Cheviot Coal Project
- Coal development policy for Alberta (1976)
- Coal mining
- Coal preparation plant
- Ecological research
- Environmental impact
- Evaluation
- Indians of North America
- Mountain Park Area
- NTS 83C
- Open pit mining
- Physiological effect
- Road construction
- Socio-economic effect
- Soil pollution
- Transmission line
- Water pollution
- Water quality
- Wildlife
- Legal References
- Alberta Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S47
- Alberta Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S51
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S37
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S40
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S41
- Coal Conservation Act S10
- Coal Conservation Act S23
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S29
- EUB Rules of Practice
- Fisheries Act S35
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S12
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
- Notes
- Conclusions made in this report are supplemental to those made in the Panels' 1997 report, Decision 97-8 (Appendix 1) and include any new information obtained since the release of that report.
- Interveners
- Hinton and District Chamber of Commerce
- Gouthro B
- Dery M
- Carramusa R
- Mork C
- United Mine Workers of America, Local 1656 (UMWA)
- Campbell R
- Town of Hinton
- Risvold R
- Alberta Environment (AENV)
- Alberta Health and Wellness
- Macdonald W
- Cox D
- Smith K
- Stenhouse G
- Sterling G
- Notan L
- MacKenzie A
- Cadomin Environmental Protection Association (CEPA)
- Way C
- Government of Canada
- Linsey G
- Tupper R
- LeFebvre JG
- LaPalme L
- Fairbairn M
- Fenton W
- Gregoire P
- Holroyd G
- Hooper R
- Weaver J
- Bradford W
- Cardiff S
- Johnson D
- Dobson B
- Purves H
- Hodgins D
- Kirkland D
- Weldwood of Canada Ltd. (Weldwood)
- Udell R
- Stauffer R
- Lougheed H
- Alberta Wilderness Association, Jasper Environmental Society,
- Pembina Institute for Responsible Development, Canadian
- Parks and Wilderness Society, and Ben Gadd (AWA Coalition)
- Pachal D
- Gunsch S
- Gadd B
- Seaton J
- Notnes R
- Kittredge P
- Howery D
- Stellmach H
- Mountain Park Environmental Protection and
- Heritage Association
- Godby EA
- Bracko M
- Alpine Club of Canada/Alberta Native Plant Council (ACC/ANPC)
- Dinwoodie A
- Strang I
- Breitkreuz C
- Griffiths G
- Mountain Cree Camp
- Mountain Cree Camp Syllabics Institute
- Nadeau M
- Parry B
- Fedirchuk G
- Nielson R
- Budinski J
- Trout Unlimited Canada (TUC)
- Brewin K
- Alberta Fish and Game Association (AFGA)
- Alexis First Nation (AFN)
- Chief Francis Alexis
- Potts P
- Canadian Nature Federation (CNF)
- Environmental Resource Centre
- Clark J. D
- Mitchell J
- O’Chiese J
- Western Canada Wilderness Committee (WCWC)
- Phillips L
- Jones G
- Treaty 8 First Nations of Alberta (Treaty 8 FN)
- Rath J
- Handel J
- Panel Consultants:
- Ross W
- Peterson E
- Stephenson HG
- Panel Secretariat:
- Kennedy WY
- MacLachlan LJ
- Henderson DIR
- Seguin N
- Creasey R
- Powell R
- Thompson JP
- Roberts L
- Stoddart A
- Brown C
- Morris D
- Nixon V
- Approval
- Approved
- Conditions
- In addition to the original conditions, CRC shall: monitor selenium levels in the water of new end-pit lakes and assess adverse effects; schedule its rail and road construction after consulting with regional forestry and petroleum companies; conduct surveys for rare plant species on mine property; control mining impact on grizzly bears; protect historic archaeological sites; develop alternative to Mountain Park off-highway staging site; maintain regional environmental management initiatives.
Decision 2001-111
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3490
- Applicant
- Epcor Generation Inc.
- Epcor Power Development Corpoaration
- Application Number
- 2001173
- Title
- Decision 2001-111: EPCOR Generation Inc. and EPCOR Power Development Corporation expansion of Genesee power plant
- Date
- 2001
- Title
- Decision 2001-111: EPCOR Generation Inc. and EPCOR Power Development Corporation expansion of Genesee power plant
- Date
- 2001
- Application Number
- 2001173
- Hearing Panel
- McCrank MN
- Lock RG
- Miller GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Utilities
- Category
- Electric power
- Descriptors
- Electric power generation
- Genesee Power Plant
- Coal - fuel
- Thermal Power Plant
- Leduc area
- NTS 83G
- Decision D2001-33
- Decision D2001-101
- Environmental impact
- Safety
- Air pollution
- Fisheries
- Water pollution
- Wildlife
- Noise (sound)
- Health
- Human factor
- Socio-economic effect
- Cooling system
- Legal References
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S2
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S2
- Notes
- EUB Decision 2001-111 on application no. 2001173 by EPCOR Generation Inc. and EPCOR Power Development Corporation to construct a 490-megawatt expansion to its existing coal-fired Genesee power plant at Rge 25-50-3 W5M
- Interveners
- Alberta Environment
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
- Capital Health Authority
- Clean Energy Coalition
- Department of Fisheries and Oceans
- ENMAX Energy Corporation
- ENMAX Power Corporation
- Enron Canada Corporation
- Environment Canada
- ESBI Alberta Ltd.
- Fording Coal Limited
- Hebner Group
- Kruger Group (for the local area residents of Genesee)
- Mewassin Community Action Group
- Paul First Nation
- TransAlta Utilities Corporation
- TransCanada Energy Limited
- Anderson AM
- Bernette Ho L
- Bird T
- Bjorge R
- Blackall P
- Bodnarek R
- Bradford J
- Buchwald V
- Bull A
- Buss K
- Cheng L
- Chesterman D
- Cook S
- Cusano LA
- Dobko R
- Donahue W
- Fairbairn M
- Forster C
- Forster L
- Gagner E
- Gaspe D
- Good Striker D
- Griffiths M
- Hannaford DJ
- Hebner B
- Hebner D
- Hemstock RN
- Hnytka F
- Huber HR
- Kellerhals M
- Kruger D
- Lakeman B
- Lawrence L
- Lawrence S
- Legge A
- Lloyd D
- MacDonald B
- Mackenzie A
- Mak A
- Marr-Laing T
- McDonald K
- Paul D
- Phillips L
- Rain O
- Rain P
- Rain R
- Ross G
- Sawatsky N
- Secord RC
- Shores W
- Stepaniuk DW
- Stubbings
- Tyrell H
- Valupadas P
- Vincent M
- Wallace RB
- Yanor-McRae R
- Approval
- Approved
- Conditions
- The Board expects that EPCOR will adhere to all commitments it made during the consultation process, in the application, and at the hearing on such matters as mitigation, monitoring, and bilateral agreements.
- Location
- ##-25-050-03W5
Decision 2006-52
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4151
- Applicant
- Compton Petroleum Corporation
- Application Number
- 1423649
- Title
- Decision 2006-052 : Decision on requests for consideration of standing respecting a well licence application by Compton Petroleum Corporation : Eastern slopes area
- Date
- 2006
- Title
- Decision 2006-052 : Decision on requests for consideration of standing respecting a well licence application by Compton Petroleum Corporation : Eastern slopes area
- Date
- 2006
- Applicant
- Compton Petroleum Corporation
- Application Number
- 1423649
- Hearing Panel
- McGee TM
- Dilay JD
- Nichol JR
- Hearing Type
- Board
- No Hearing
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Air quality
- Eastern Slopes area
- Environmental impact assessment
- Groundwater
- IL 93-09
- Water pollution
- Well licence
- Intervener status
- Legal References
- Energy Resources Conservation Act
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations
- Interveners
- Livingston Landowners Group
- Olthafer L
- Municipal District of Pincher Creek
- Smith T
- Gold T
- Gold I
- Halibert K
- Kathol N
- Pekisko Group
- Cross J
- Blades M
- Alberta Wilderness Association
- Douglas N
- South Porcupine Hills Stewardship Association
- Newton B
- Approval
- Denied
- Location
- 15-28-009-01W5
Decision 2006-102
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4182
- Applicant
- EnCana Corporation
- Application Number
- 1393397
- Title
- Decision 2006-102: EnCana Corporation applications for licences for 15 wells, a pipeline, and a compressor addition, Wimborne and Twining Fields
- Date
- 2006
- Title
- Decision 2006-102: EnCana Corporation applications for licences for 15 wells, a pipeline, and a compressor addition, Wimborne and Twining Fields
- Date
- 2006
- Applicant
- EnCana Corporation
- Application Number
- 1393397
- Hearing Panel
- McCrank MN
- Dilay JD
- Miller GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Pipelines
- Descriptors
- Battle Fm
- Bearpaw Fm
- Compressor station
- Directive 027
- Dispute resolution
- Drilling (Well)
- Gas processing plant
- Groundwater
- Horseshoe Canyon Fm
- NTS 83P
- Paskapoo Fm
- Pipeline
- Pipeline construction
- Scollard Fm
- Twining Field
- Well licence
- Water pollution
- Whitemud Fm
- Wimborne Field
- Legal References
- Pipeline Act Part 4
- Interveners
- Hoppins K
- Doering G
- Niemi K
- Howard L
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- APPENDIX 1 SUMMARY OF COMMITMENTS AND CONDITIONS COMMITMENTS BY ENCANA
- Test all water wells within 400 m, 11 additional wells located between 400 m and 880 m, some springs in the area, and all high-yield water wells present within 1000 m of an EnCana well. CONDITIONS
- Measure the pressure between the tubing and casing annulus above the zones being fractured, note and explain any increased pressures, and report the findings to the EUB within five days of the fracturing operation.
- Install a groundwater monitoring well in the deepest aquifer immediately above the Battle Formation within 50 m of the EnCana well that has the shallowest surface casing depth. The water quality is to be determined prior to fracturing operations, and the water level is to be monitored continuously, commencing immediately prior to and continuing during and after fracturing operations, until the level has stabilized. The water quality testing is to be conducted in accordance with Alberta Environment’s Standard for Baseline Water-Well Testing for Coalbed Methane/Natural Gas in Coal Operations, April 2006. The results of this monitoring are to be reported to the Board and interveners within 30 days. Thereafter, monitoring will be done on a yearly basis and reported by December 1 of each year. This condition will be reviewed after the findings of the Shallow Fracturing Technical Committee are released or a period of five years.
- Ensure the noise level at EnCana’s facility remains within 25 dBA as measured at the Bauer residence under summertime conditions, as outlined in Table 3 of the Faszer Farquarson report, and within the EUB’s PSLs at all other times. Alternatively, EnCana could comply by demonstrating that the facility, when operating under the above conditions, is not audible above the ambient sound level, or Mr. D. Bauer could agree that the noise from the facility is acceptable under conditions that the resident believes represents a worst-case scenario.
Decision 2008-02
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4265
- Applicant
- Artemis Exploration Inc.
- Application Number
- 1478721
- 1494900
- 1494911
- Title
- Decision 2008-002: Artemis Exploration Inc. application for well, pipeline and facility licences Furness field
- Date
- 2008
- Title
- Decision 2008-002: Artemis Exploration Inc. application for well, pipeline and facility licences Furness field
- Date
- 2008
- Applicant
- Artemis Exploration Inc.
- Application Number
- 1478721
- 1494900
- 1494911
- Hearing Panel
- Dilay JD
- McGee TM
- Warren WA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Pipelines
- Descriptors
- Position (location)
- Gas flaring
- Safety
- Water pollution
- Public consultation
- Furness field
- NTS 83H
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Pipeline Act Part 4
- Interveners
- Welgan H
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- APPENDIX 2 SUMMARY OF COMMITMENTS The Board notes throughout the decision report that Artemis has undertaken to conduct certain activities in connection with its operations that are not strictly required by EUB regulations or guidelines. These undertakings are described as commitments and are summarized below. It is the Board’s view that when a company makes commitments of this nature, it has satisfied itself that these activities will benefit both the project and the public, and the Board takes these commitments into account when arriving at its decision. The Board expects the applicant, having made the commitments, to fully carry out the undertaking or advise the EUB if, for whatever reasons, it cannot fulfill a commitment. The EUB would then assess whether the circumstances regarding the failed commitment warrant a review of the original approval. The Board also notes that the affected parties also have the right to request a review of the original approval if commitments made by the applicant remain unfulfilled. COMMITMENTS BY ARTEMIS
- Artemis commits to using an incinerator during well testing if in-line testing is not feasible.
- Artemis commits to surveying the actual kelly bushing elevation following rig-up. The data will be used to recalculate the depths on the geological prognosis for the drilling of the 15-10 well.
- Artemis commits to having a well site geologist present on site and increasing the geological sampling interval from every 5 m to every 2 m from -560 m subsea (SS) to total depth.
- Artemis commits to using a gas detector on site.
- Artemis commits to checking geolograph and pipe tallies before the drilling depth reaches -560 mSS, and if significant discrepancies are apparent, Artemis will trip out the drill string and retally back into the hole.
- Artemis commits to control drilling practices below -560 m SS, with reduced penetration rates from -560 m SS to total depth, to allow enhanced sampling intervals, improved gas detection accuracy, and an accurate determination of when the shale separating the bottom of the Lower Mannville sandstone channel from the Ellerslie G (if present) has been entered.
- Location
- 15-10-048-23W4
- 07-10-048-23W4