11 records – page 1 of 1.

Decision 2008-24

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4280
Applicant
Petro-Canada Oil Sands Inc.
Application Number
1490956
Title
Decision 2008-024: Petro-Canada Oil Sands Inc. application to construct and operate the Sturgeon upgrader Sturgeon County
Date
2008
Title
Decision 2008-024: Petro-Canada Oil Sands Inc. application to construct and operate the Sturgeon upgrader Sturgeon County
Date
2008
Applicant
Petro-Canada Oil Sands Inc.
Application Number
1490956
Hearing Panel
Dilay JD
Miller GJ
McManus BT
Hearing Type
Prehearing
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Environmental impact
Groundwater
Surface water
Air quality
Soil
Vegetation
Wildlife
Noise reduction
Health
Safety
Emergency response plan
Economic analysis
Socio-economic effect
Sturgeon County
Upgrading
Oil sands
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S11
Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act
Water Act S36
Water Act S37
Water Act S49
Water Act S50
Interveners
Alexander First Nations Industrial Relations Corporation (AFN IRC)
Northeast Sturgeon County Industrial Landowners (NESCIL) and the Citizens for Responsible Development (CFRD)
Shaw S
Shaw K
Statoil Hydro Canada
Norh West Upgrading
Suncor Energy Inc.
S.V. Farms, S.V. Half Diamond Ranch, 267554 Alberta Ltd., and the J.Smulski Estate
Hoehn R
Total E&P Canada Ltd.
Wright A
Approval
No approval required
Location
00-19-056-21W4
00-02-056-21W4
00-03-056-21W4
00-10-056-21W4
00-11-056-21W4
00-12-056-21W4
00-13-056-21W4
00-14-056-21W4
00-15-056-21W4
00-22-056-21W4
00-23-056-21W4
00-24-056-21W4
00-25-056-21W4
00-26-056-21W4
00-27-056-21W4
Less detail

Decision 2009-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4337
Applicant
Petro-Canada Oil Sands Incorporated
Application Number
1490956
Title
Decision 2009-002: Petro-Canada Oil Sands Inc. application to construct and operate an oil sands upgrader in Sturgeon County
Date
2009
Title
Decision 2009-002: Petro-Canada Oil Sands Inc. application to construct and operate an oil sands upgrader in Sturgeon County
Date
2009
Applicant
Petro-Canada Oil Sands Incorporated
Application Number
1490956
Hearing Panel
Dilay JD
Ebbels JD
Gilmour JG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Air quality
Safety
Surface water
Groundwater
Reclamation
Noise (sound)
Gasification
Gas flaring
Coking
Vegetation
Oil sands
Upgrader
Sturgeon County
NTS83H
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S11
Alberta Utilities Commission Act S80
Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S49
Water Act S36
Water Act S37
Water Act S49
Water Act S50
Administrative Procedures and Jurisdiction Act S12
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms S7
Interveners
Northwest Sturgeon County Industrial Landowners and Citzens for Responsible Development NESCIL/CFRD
Shaw Femily
SV Half Diamond Ranch, SV Farms Ltd.
Hoehn R
Sturgeon County
Town of Gibbons
Alberta Justice
Algerta Industrial Heartland Association of Sturgeon County
Energy Resources Conservation Board Staff
Metis Nation of Alberta (MNA)
Total E&P Canada Ltd.
Suncor Energy Inc.
Shell Canada
StatoiHydro
North West Upgrading Inc (North West)
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
APPENDIX 1
Summary of Commitments
Commitments by Petro-Canada Oil Sands Inc.
General
Stakeholders
Noise
Light
Flare
Dust
Air
FAP
VOC/PAH
GHG
Water
Land
Wastes
ERP
Traffic
Historical
Wildlife APPENDIX 2
Approval Conditions
Less detail

Decision 2009-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4346
Applicant
Encana Corporation
Application Number
1435831
Title
Decision 2009-08: Encana Corporation shallow gas infill development project Suffield National Wildlife Area, Alberta (ERCB application no. 1435831, CEAA reference no. 05-07-15620) report of the ERCB-CEAA joint review panel
Date
2009
Title
Decision 2009-08: Encana Corporation shallow gas infill development project Suffield National Wildlife Area, Alberta (ERCB application no. 1435831, CEAA reference no. 05-07-15620) report of the ERCB-CEAA joint review panel
Date
2009
Applicant
Encana Corporation
Application Number
1435831
Hearing Panel
Connelly RG
Ross B
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Joint
Descriptors
Reclamation
Wildlife
Vegetation
Soil
Wetland
Water resource
Renewable resource
Noise reduction
Air quality
Health
Climate
Greenhouse effect
Meteorology
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
NTS 72L
Shallow producing
Suffield area
Gas well
Environmental impact
Milk River FM
Medicine Hat FM
Second White Specks FM
Conservation
Legal References
Canada Wildlife Act S2
Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S35
Wildlife Area Regulations S3
Wildlife Area Regulations S4
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
EUB Rules of Practice S12
Interveners
Environmental Coalition
Government of Canada
Suffield Environmental Advisory Committee (SEAC)
Sufrfield Industry Range Control (SIRC)
Living World Nature Trust
Kettenbach M
Federation of Alberta Naturalists
Longair Dr. R
Trottier G
Flint Energy
Society of Grasslands Naturalists
Cerpro Energy
Gardner R
Canadian Parks & Wilderness Society and Nature Saskatchewan
Hagen D
Ernst J
Approval
Approved with conditions
Approved (partial)
Location
11-28-015-06W4
13-28-015-06W4
15-28-015-06W4
Less detail

Decision 2009-51

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4375
Applicant
EnCana Corporation
Application Number
1508544
1508545
1508547
Title
Decision 2009-051 : EnCana Corporation applications for three well licences Suffield Field
Date
2009
Title
Decision 2009-051 : EnCana Corporation applications for three well licences Suffield Field
Date
2009
Applicant
EnCana Corporation
Application Number
1508544
1508545
1508547
Hearing Panel
McManus BT
Gilmour J
Warren WA
Hearing Type
Board
Written hearing
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Suffield Field
NTS 72L
Soil
Vegetation
Water
Wetland
Wildlife
Conservation
Reclamation
Land use
Well licence
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Interveners
Department of National Defence (DND)
AltaGas Holdings Incorporated
Approval
Approved
Location
15-03-016-09W4
Less detail

Decision 2010-22

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4423
Applicant
Petro-Canada
Application Number
1517168
1517170
1574414
1574366
1574409
1517148
1520922
1517151
1520923
1517160
1517176
1520388
1513051
Title
Decision 2010-022: Petro-Canada applications for eleven well licences, one multiwell gas battery licence, and two pipeline licences Sullivan Field
Date
2010
Title
Decision 2010-022: Petro-Canada applications for eleven well licences, one multiwell gas battery licence, and two pipeline licences Sullivan Field
Date
2010
Applicant
Petro-Canada
Application Number
1517168
1517170
1574414
1574366
1574409
1517148
1520922
1517151
1520923
1517160
1517176
1520388
1513051
Hearing Panel
Dilay GW
McManus BT
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Pipelines
Descriptors
Battery
Community relations
Copyright
Emergency procedure
Pipeline
NTS 82J
Decision D2008-29
Fescue
Grazing
Socio-economic effect
Site survey
Risk
SullivanField
Well licence
Safety
Environment
Health
Livestock
Environmental impact assessment
Land use
Air quality
Water quality
Range grass
Vegetation
Grass
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
Prehearing meeting was held in Longview on March 18, 2008
Interveners
Big Loop Group
Stoney Nakoda Nation
Pekisko Group
Royal Adderson and Bad Ad Ranches Ltd.
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
See Appendix 1 (p. 113 - 147) Summary of conditions and commitments
Location
12-11-018-05W5
Less detail

Decision 2010-30

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4431
Applicant
Total E&P Canada Limited
Application Number
1551460
Title
Decision 2010-030: Total E&P Canada Ltd. application to construct and operate and oil sands upgrader in Strathcona County
Date
2010
Title
Decision 2010-030: Total E&P Canada Ltd. application to construct and operate and oil sands upgrader in Strathcona County
Date
2010
Applicant
Total E&P Canada Limited
Application Number
1551460
Hearing Panel
Dilay JD
McFadyen D
Watson TL
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Air quality
Environmental impact assessment
Water pipeline
Position (location)
Emission
Health
Emergency response plan
Safety
Surface water
Runoff
North Saskatchewan River
Groundwater
Noise (sound)
Bitumen
Manufactured crude oil
Coke
Sulphur
Vegetation
Soil conservation
Soil pollution
Oil sands
Upgrader
Strathcona County
Fort Saskatchewan area
NTS83H
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S11
Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S53
Water Act S37
Water Act S50
Energy Resources Conservation Act S26
Energy Resources Conservation Act S3
Interveners
Citizens for Responsible Development
Vissher H
Vissher E
Henryk Farms Ltd.
Alexander First Nation
Aux Sable Canada Ltd
North West Upgrading Inc.
Shell Canada Energy
Town of Gibbons
Town of Redwater
Town of Bon Accord
City of Fort Saskatchewan
City of Edmonton
Strathcona County
Sturgeon County
Alberta Industrial Heartland Association
Sturgeon Community Hospital Foundation
Merry R
Olstad R
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
CONDITIONS
The Board conditions TOTAL’s approval to require it to achieve 99.5 per cent sulphur recovery on a calendar quarter-year basis within 6 months of commencing start-up activities.
The Board conditions the approval to require TOTAL to conduct a full-scale emergency response exercise that must be performed during a peak traffic period and include notification and actual or simulated evacuation of affected residents/exercise participants prior to start up of operations.
The Board conditions the approval to require TOTAL to submit in its site-specific ERP, an assessment of all hazards, including an H2S release, and appropriate responses based on the particular hazard for the Board’s review and approval following completion of detailed engineering and design, and its full-scale emergency response exercise.
The Board conditions the approval to require TOTAL to submit a revised NIA, prepared in accordance with the requirements of Directive 038, six months prior to starting construction.
The Board conditions the approval to require TOTAL to redo its baseline sound monitoring surveys, in accordance with the requirements of Directive 038, which will include the simultaneous measurement of the A-weighted and C-weighted sound levels in 1/3 octave band values.
The Board conditions TOTAL’s approval to require TOTAL to conduct the post-commissioning sound monitoring survey three months after start-up to verify compliance with the requirements of Directive 038.
The Board conditions the approval to expire on December 31, 2016, unless TOTAL satisfies the Board by no later than October 1, 2016, that construction has commenced or unless the Board stipulates a later date.
Location
xx-17-055-21W4
xx-18-055-21W4
xx-19-055-21W4
xx-20-055-21W4
xx-24-055-22W4
xx-25-055-22W4
xx-36-055-22W4
Less detail

Decision 2011-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4445
Applicant
Total E&P Limited
Application Number
1445535
Title
Decision 2011-005 : Total E&P Joslyn Ltd. application for an oil sands mine and bitumen processing facility Joslyn North mine project Fort McMurray area
Date
2011
Title
Decision 2011-005 : Total E&P Joslyn Ltd. application for an oil sands mine and bitumen processing facility Joslyn North mine project Fort McMurray area
Date
2011
Applicant
Total E&P Limited
Application Number
1445535
Hearing Panel
Dilay JD
Ross B
McFadyen D
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Oil sands oil recovery
Bitumen
Oil sands
Directive 074
Environmental impact assessment
Conservation
Environmental impact
Wildlife
Vegetation
Wetland
Water
Fish
History
Paleontology
Land use
Socio-economic effect
Economic development
Noise (sound)
Reclamation
Liability (law)
Tailings - storage
Settling pond
Residential building
Public consultation
Cumulative impact assessment
Legal References
2011 ABERCB 005
Oil Sands Conservation Act S3
Oil Sands Conservation Act S24
Oil Sands Conservation Act S26
Oil Sands Conservation Regulation
Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act
Water Act
Energy Resources Conservation Act
Canadian Environmental Assessment Act
Notes
Report of the joint review panel established by the Federal Minister of the Environment and the Energy Resources Conservation Board
Change to legal citation effective January 2011
Interveners
BP Canada Energy Company
Shell Canada Limited
Syncrude Canada Limited
Belanger F member of the Dene Sioux First Nation
Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo (RMWB)
Oil Sands Environmental Coalition (OSEC)
Mikisew Cree First Nation (MCFN)
Fort McKay First Nation and Metis Nation Local #63 (Fort McKay)
Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation (ACFN)
Non-Status Fort McMurray Band Descendents, and Off-Reserve Fort McMurray Band Descendants
Sierra Club Prairie
Guertin M
Clearwater River Band No. 175
Government of Canada
Government of Alberta
Joint Review Panel (Panel) staff
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
Condition 1 – TOTAL will submit a detailed tailings management plan two years before commencement of operations, and TOTAL will clearly demonstrate its ability to meet all requirements of Directive 074. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 2 – TOTAL will devise methods for measuring fines at the project in accordance with Energy Resources Conservation Board requirements. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 3 – TOTAL will notify the Energy Resources Conservation Board in writing of any proposed pilot plants and/or demonstration plants for all technology development at least six months before construction of those facilities begins. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 4 – TOTAL will provide written updates of any previously submitted test reports by no later than February 28 each year, or as otherwise specified by the Energy Resources Conservation Board. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 5 – TOTAL will not exceed three million cubic metres of fluid in the sand beach area sumps. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 6 – One year prior to plant start-up, TOTAL will privide measurement plans to the Energy Resources Conservation Board for review and approval, including process and instrumentation diagrams, metering, sampling methods, analytical methods and, material balance procedures that satisfy Energy Resources Conservation Board measurement requirements. (Section 5.2.2) Condition 7 – TOTAL will not discharge any untreated froth treatment tailings to the tailings disposal area. (Section 5.3.2) Condition 8 – On an annual average basis, TOTAL will limit site-wide solvent losses to not more than four volumes per thousand volumes of bitumen production under any operating conditions. (Section 5.3.2) Condition 9 – On an annual average basis, TOTAL will limit the amount of asphaltene rejection to 10 mass per cent based on bitumen production. (Section 5.4.2) Condition 10 – TOTAL will submit detailed geotechnical designs for all external overburden disposal areas and reclamation stockpiles to the Energy Resources Conservation Board at least six months prior to conducting any field preparation in these areas. (Section 5.5.3) Condition 11 – TOTAL will submit to the Energy Resources Conservation Board, for its review and approval, detailed geotechnical designs and setback distances for critical infrastructure two years prior to site preparation activities for the ore preparation plant pit, the west and southern final pitwall, and for the final pitwall design and assessed setback from the Ells River. (Section 5.5.3) Condition 12 – TOTAL will provide Alberta Environment with a wildlife mitigation plan for approval prior to clearing any vegetation. The plan must achieve no net significant adverse effect on species at risk and deal with mitigating impacts to not only species at risk, but also valued wildlife. (Section 6.1.3) Condition 13 – TOTAL will monitor noise levels at James Grandejambe’s cabin. Should noise levels exceed those outlined in Directive 038, TOTAL will ensure that mitigation measures are implemented and that Directive 038 compliance is met. (Section 9.6.3) Condition 14 – TOTAL will maintain unimpeded access required for stakeholders to areas west of the project until the Moose Lake access management plan, or an equivalent, is implemented. (Section 9.7.3) Condition 15 – TOTAL will actively support and participate in the Cumulative Environmental Management Association and other regional committees to develop and use its strategies to mitigate both development and regional cumulative environmental effects. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 16 – TOTAL will limit the area of disturbance to 5000 hectares or less. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 17 – TOTAL will remove all benching on mine discard structures prior to reclaiming them. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 18 – TOTAL will provide sustainable watershed designs with vegetated watercourses for geotechnical design applications for mine discard structures. Landform watershed designs should be consistent with regionally recognized guidelines for the purpose of erosion management. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 19 – TOTAL will provide an amended mine plan to demonstrate an integrated landform and landscape design for the Canadian Natural Resources Limited – TOTAL common mine boundary to the Energy Resources Conservation Board for approval five years prior to development. The amended plan must include a discussion of the feasibility of filling the trench area between the Joslyn North and Horizon projects with mine discard. The plan must also include a discussion of the alternatives considered by TOTAL. (Section 10.2.3) Condition 20 – TOTAL will submit an annual report to the Energy Resources Conservation Board, starting two years prior to commencing mining operations, that describes its end pit lake research and development efforts for the previous year, and the current plans and timelines for determining the efficacy of its end pit lake within seven years of mine closure. This report will include all of TOTAL’s efforts and contributions with respect to collaboration on the demonstration of a full scale end pit lake. (Section 12.3)
Less detail

Decision 2011-07

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4447
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
1614134
1614144
1614145
1614198
1614210
Title
Decision 2011-007 : Shell Canada Limited applications for well, facility, and pipelines licences Waterton Field
Date
2011
Title
Decision 2011-007 : Shell Canada Limited applications for well, facility, and pipelines licences Waterton Field
Date
2011
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
1614134
1614144
1614145
1614198
1614210
Hearing Panel
Bruni MJ
Watson TL
McManus BT
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Well licence
Descriptors
Waterton Field
NTS 82G
Well licence
Pipeline licence
Facility licence
Directive 071
Directive 060
Directive 056
Natural gas
Hydrogen sulphide
Risk
Corrosion control
Carbondale area
Environmental impact
Mississippian FM
Rundle FM
Emergency response plan
Vegetation
Wildlife
Sulphur dioxide
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.002(1)
Pipeline Act Part 4
2011 ABERCB 007
Notes
Change to legal citation effective January 2011
Interveners
Castle-Crown Wilderness Coalition
Sheppard-Barbero group
Orich-Fisher group
Judd-Latham group
McDowall S
Healy H
Crowshoe E
Plain Eagle M
Smith F
Yellow Wings W
Little Wolf M
Small Legs E
Ryan W
Laskin D
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
The Board understands the frustration of residents about the time they spend dealing with matters arising from oil and gas development in the area; therefore, the Board advises that it will look to the quality of outcomes and not the quantity of consultation as a demonstration of success.
The Board directs Shell to conduct a drilling and completions ERP exercise prior to spudding the WT68 well and to involve interested stakeholders in the development and implementation of and follow-up to that exercise.
The Board directs Shell to control dust on the Seven Gates Road by watering the road as required based on the weather, road use, and road condition during drilling and completion of the well.
The Board directs Shell to have a traffic monitor close to the junction of Seven Gates Road and Highway 507 during drilling and completions of the well.
The ERCB directs that if Shell needs to test the well, the operational plans for this test, either in-line or by flaring, must be submitted to the ERCB for approval.
Location
10-01-006-03W5
06-12-006-03W5
Less detail

Decision 2013-18

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4516
Application Number
1769924
Title
Decision 2013-018 : Proceeding into odours and emissions in the Peace River area : organizational meeting report
Date
2013
Title
Decision 2013-018 : Proceeding into odours and emissions in the Peace River area : organizational meeting report
Date
2013
Application Number
1769924
Hearing Panel
McManus BT
Macken C
Engen T
Hearing Type
Board
Descriptors
Odor
Emission
Peace River area
Three Creeks area
Reno area
Seal Lake area
Heavy oil project
Recommendation
Impact
Impact assessment
Health
Transportation corridor
Vegetation
Livestock
Farm crop
Safety
Freedom of information
Monitoring
Evaluation
Vapor
Noise (sound)
Environmental impact
Soil pollution
Water pollution
Air pollution
Gas flaring
Combustion
Air quality
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Responsible Energy Development Act (REDA) D17
AER Rules of Practice
2013 ABAER 018
Notes
Change to legal citation effective January 2011
Approval
No approval required
Less detail

Decision 2014-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4524
Application Number
1769924
Title
Decision 2014-005 : Report of recommendations on odours and emissions in the Peace River area
Date
2014
Title
Decision 2014-005 : Report of recommendations on odours and emissions in the Peace River area
Date
2014
Application Number
1769924
Hearing Panel
McManus BT
Macken C
Engen T
McManus RC
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Environment/Pollution
Descriptors
Odor
Emission
Peace River area
Heavy oil project
Recommendation
Impact
Impact assessment
Health
Transportation corridor
Vegetation
Livestock
Farm crop
Safety
Freedom of information
Monitoring
Evaluation
Vapor
Noise (sound)
Environmental impact
Soil pollution
Water pollution
Air pollution
Gas flaring
Combustion
Air quality
Socio-economic effect
Decision 2013-018
DIR 060
Three Creeks area
Reno area
Seal Lake area
Legal References
Responsible Energy Development Act (REDA) D17
AER Rules of Practice
2014 ABAER 005
Notes
Change to legal citation effective January 2011
Approval
No approval required
Less detail

Decision 2014-13

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4532
Applicant
Prosper Petroleum Limited
Application Number
1779665
1795000
Title
Decision 2014-013 : Prosper Petroleum Ltd regulatory appeal of 24 well licences and a letter of authority undefined field
Date
2014
Title
Decision 2014-013 : Prosper Petroleum Ltd regulatory appeal of 24 well licences and a letter of authority undefined field
Date
2014
Applicant
Prosper Petroleum Limited
Application Number
1779665
1795000
Hearing Panel
McManus BT
McManus RC
Macken C
Hearing Type
Board
Written hearing
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Oil sands
Well licence
Fort Mackay area
Vegetation
Wildlife
Fish
Ministerial Order 141/2013
Land use
Environmental impact
Lower Athabasca Regional Plan
Legal References
Alberta Land Stewardship Act
Responsible Energy Development Act (REDA) D3
Responsible Energy Development Act (REDA) S67
AER Rules of Practice P3
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S4
REDA General Regulation S3
Public Lands Act S20
Notes
Change to legal citation effective January 2011
Fort McKay First Nations and Fort McKay Metis Community Association were participants in the written review
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
All drilling activity will be a minimum of 100 m from any water bodies with defined bed and shore · Avoid fish bearing lakes where possible for water withdrawals · Minimize withdrawals from fish bearing lakes · No fishing or access to Namur Lake [Buffalo Lake] will be allowed for Prosper staff and contractors · Prosper also committed to follow each of the mitigation measures that Koch Oil Sands Operating ULC (Koch), from which it acquired the lease, committed to Fort McKay: 1. To fence all open sumps until reclamation to restrict wildlife access to these locations. 2. To follow all regulatory requirements and setbacks when constructing and utilizing sumps. 3. To arrange a field visit for community members to view a sump during winter operations. 4. To provide First Nation with information on the amount of water applied for under TDL, the amount used, sources of the withdrawals and the uses of the water. 5. Upon completion of program, logs and/or woody debris will be placed across access routes so as to block/restrict recreational users’ access, except on access that is held under disposition and used by other companies. 6. Workers will be living in the area campsite and will not be commuting to Fort McMurray on a daily basis. 7. During shift change (on average of three weeks) workers will carpool in groups of five or six to and from Fort McMurray. 8. To enter the OSE program from the south route only.
Location
06-20-096-17W4
08-20-096-17W4
02-20-096-17W4
14-20-096-17W4
16-20-096-17W4
01-21-096-17W4
02-21-096-17W4
10-21-096-17W4
12-21-096-17W4
14-21-096-17W4
16-21-096-17W4
09-10-096-17W4
04-19-096-17W4
06-19-096-17W4
07-19-096-17W4
12-19-096-17W4
14-19-096-17W4
15-19-096-17W4
02-28-096-17W4
04-28-096-17W4
03-29-096-17W4
08-29-096-17W4
08-30-096-17W4
03-30-096-17W4
Less detail

11 records – page 1 of 1.