Narrow Results By
Applicant
- Alberta Electric System Operator 2
- Alsands Project Group 1
- BA Energy Inc. 2
- Canadian Natural Resources Limited 1
- ESSO Resources Canada Limited 1
- Energy Resources Conservation Board 1
- Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited 1
- North West Upgrading Inc. 1
- Petro-Canada Oil Sands Inc. 1
- Shell Canada Limited 1
- Shell Canada Products Limited 1
- Suncor Energy Inc 1
Decision 79-A
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2344
- Applicant
- Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
- Application Number
- 780318
- Title
- Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, part 8)
- Date
- 1979
- Title
- Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, part 8)
- Date
- 1979
- Applicant
- Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
- Application Number
- 780318
- Hearing Panel
- Bohme VE
- Evans RG
- Kupchanko EE
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Great Canadian Oil Sands
- Oil mining
- Suncor plant
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Air quality
- Athabasca River
- Benefit cost analysis
- Delayed coking
- Effluent
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Expansion
- Material balance
- Mine design
- NTS 74E
- Open pit mining
- Overburden ratio
- Plant design
- Pollution control
- Recovery factor
- Socio-economic effect
- Sulphur dioxide
- Sulphur recovery
- Surface mining
- Upgrading
- Waste disposal
- Water quality
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S43
- Notes
- ERCB report 79-A on application No. 780318 to amend approval No. 1944 to modify and expand existing facilities located in TP.92-93, R.10, W4M; Board hearing 1979-01-30/31
Decision 79-E
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2340
- Applicant
- ESSO Resources Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 770866
- Title
- Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Section 43 and Coal Conservation Act, Section 27)
- Date
- 1979
- Title
- Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Section 43 and Coal Conservation Act, Section 27)
- Date
- 1979
- Applicant
- ESSO Resources Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 770866
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Berkowitz N
- Bohme VE
- Solodzuk W
- Isbister WD
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Cold Lake area
- Cold Lake heavy oil project
- Heavy oil project
- Steam injection
- Oil sands project
- Thermal recovery
- Viscous oil recovery
- Benefit cost analysis
- Bituminous deposit
- Coal - fuel
- Environmental impact
- IL-OG-74-05
- Flexicoking
- Industrial development permit
- Manufactured crude oil
- Material balance
- Natural gas - fuel
- NTS 73L
- Recovery factor
- Reserve
- Socio-economic effect
- Upgrading
- Waste disposal
- Waste water
- Water supply
- Well spacing
- Legal References
- Coal Conservation Act S27
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S43
- Notes
- ERCB Report 79-E on application no. 770866 to produce and upgrade crude bitumen and for an industrial development permit to use coal as a fuel for the project (TP.64-65, R.3-4, W4M); Board hearing 1978-09-05 adjourned to 1978-12-04 through 1978-12-20 and 1979-01-03 through 1979-01-08 and 1979-05-29/30/31; Report 81-C on application (Application no. 800664) to change makeup fuel and ERCB Decision D83-21 for later application (No. 830620) for phased development of the project
Decision 79-H
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2337
- Applicant
- Alsands Project Group
- Application Number
- 780724
- 790191
- Title
- Decision on application by Alsands project group, 1979 (oil sands surface mining and upgrading scheme) Alsands Fort Mcmurray project
- Date
- 1979
- Title
- Decision on application by Alsands project group, 1979 (oil sands surface mining and upgrading scheme) Alsands Fort Mcmurray project
- Date
- 1979
- Applicant
- Alsands Project Group
- Application Number
- 780724
- 790191
- Hearing Panel
- Berkowitz N
- Strom NA
- Kupchanko EE
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Utilities
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Alsands project
- Electric power project
- Oil mining
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Benefit cost analysis
- Dragline
- Drainage
- Electric power plant
- Environmental impact
- Fluid coking
- Gasification
- Hot water process
- Industrial waste
- Land reclamation
- McMurray Fm
- Mine design
- Municipality
- NTS 74E
- Reclamation
- Regional planning
- Socio-economic effect
- Surface mining
- Tailings
- Oil sands reserve
- Upgrading
- Waste disposal
- Waste water
- Legal References
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S7
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S43
- Notes
- ERCB report 79-H on application No. 780724 for oil sands surface mining and upgrading scheme (TP.95-96, R.9-11, W4M) and on application No. 790191 for associated power plan; Board hearing 1979-06-19 thru 1979-07-05; addenda - Jan. 7, 1980 attached; see earlier related Decision ERCB report 74-H
Decision 91-AA
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision40
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Title
- OSLO project : A commercial oil sands project
- Date
- 1991
- Title
- OSLO project : A commercial oil sands project
- Date
- 1991
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Land reclamation
- Mining geology
- Oil mining
- OSLO project
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Upgrading
- Fort McMurray area
- Economic analysis
- Socio-economic impact assessment
- Notes
- interim report of the OSLO application review team
Decision 99-08
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3042
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Shell Canada Products Limited
- Application Number
- 980137
- 980337
- Title
- Decision 99-08: Shell Canada Limited application to construct and operate an oil sands bitumen upgrader in the Fort Saskatchewan area and Shell Canada Products Limited application to amend refinery approval in the Fort Saskatchewan area
- Date
- 1999
- Title
- Decision 99-08: Shell Canada Limited application to construct and operate an oil sands bitumen upgrader in the Fort Saskatchewan area and Shell Canada Products Limited application to amend refinery approval in the Fort Saskatchewan area
- Date
- 1999
- Application Number
- 980137
- 980337
- Hearing Panel
- Dilay JD
- Mink FJ
- Lillo HO
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Air quality
- Environmental impact
- Fort Saskatchewan area
- Industrial development permit
- Land use
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 83H
- Sulphur recovery
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Upgrading
- Legal References
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S11
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S13
- Notes
- EUB Decision D99-08 on application 9980137 by Shell Canada Limtied to construct and operate an oil sands bitumen upgrader on Shell's property adjoining the existing Scotford refinery (Section 31 and 32, 55-21 W4M) to process bitumen from Shell's proposed Muskeg River Mine; and on application 980337 by Shell Canada Products to amend the existing Scotford refinery approval (IDP 89-10) for the processing of 3.75 million cubic metres per year of sour conversion feedstock;
- Board hearing (Josephburg): 1998-10-26/27/28
- Interveners
- Strathcona County
- Zayac, W.
- Demeule, N.
- Schotte, E
- Dzurny, A.
- Corridor Pipeline Limited
- Redwater Water Disposal Company Limited
- Lakeland Regional Health Authority
- Location
- ##-31-055-21W4
- ##-32-055-21W4
Decision 2004-05
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3790
- Applicant
- Canadian Natural Resources Limited
- Application Number
- 1273113
- Title
- Decision 2004-5: Canadian Natural Resources Limited, application for an oil sands mine, bitumen extraction plant, and bitumen upgrading plant in the Fort McMurray area (Horizon Oilsands project Joint panel report of Alberta Energy and Utilities Board and Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency)
- Date
- 2004
- Title
- Decision 2004-5: Canadian Natural Resources Limited, application for an oil sands mine, bitumen extraction plant, and bitumen upgrading plant in the Fort McMurray area (Horizon Oilsands project Joint panel report of Alberta Energy and Utilities Board and Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency)
- Date
- 2004
- Applicant
- Canadian Natural Resources Limited
- Application Number
- 1273113
- Hearing Panel
- Dilay JD
- Houlihan RN
- Kupfer G
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Joint
- Category
- Oil sands
- Legal References
- Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act 1992
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S11
- Notes
- Also available in French
- Interveners
- Deer Creek Energy Limited
- Theriault D
- Montemurro M
- Hackbarth D
- Mikisew Cree First Nations
- Schindler D
- Byrne J
- Brownlee J
- Kienzle S
- Komers P
- Waquan A (Chief)
- Courtorielle W
- Courtorielle S
- McKay R
- Waquan MR
- Marten T
- Oil Sands Environmental Coalition
- Kitagawa M
- Woynillowicz D
- Dort-McLean A
- Fort McKay First Nation
- Metis Local 122 (Fort McKay)
- Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation
- Fort McMurray Medical Staff Association
- Marlboro Environmental Committee
- Brandenburg
- Sierra Club of Canada
- Dastous C
- Dastous M
- Shell Canada Limited
- Suncor Energ Inc.
- Imperial Oil Resources
- ExxonMobil Canada
- Syncrude Canada
- UTS Energy Corp.
- Birch Mountain Resources Ltd.
- Government of Canada
- Environment Canada
- Fairbairn M
- Bates-Frymel L
- Norton MR
- Brownlee B
- Lindeman D
- Department of Fisheries and Oceans
- Majewski D
- Thomson A
- Courtney R
- Makowecki B
- Shamess J
- Walker D
- Huber W
- Natural Resources Canada
- Browning GR
- Cliffe MK
- Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Alberta
- Yoshisaka D
- de la Chevrotiere C
- Marriott P
- Boyd M
- Barrett R
- Bodo K
- Chabaylo R
- Rhude L
- McEachern P
- Singh K
- Hale C
- Wood Buffalo First Nation
- Campbell RSJ
- Castor W
- Cree E
- Woodward R
- McDonald D
- Chipewyan Prairie First Nation Industrial Relations Corporation
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- CNRL must do the following as conditions of approval: On or before December 31, 2007, submit to the EUB for its review and approval a report on the southwest area lease boundary containing a comprehensive evaluation of the lease boundary geology and reserves, geotechnical conditions, alternative mining scenarios and impacts, and associated costs, in accordance with Section 3.1 of EUB ID 2001-7 (Section 7.1.3). At least five years prior to mining at the southeast lease boundary but no later than December 31, 2010, submit to the EUB for its review and approval a report on the southeast area lease boundary containing a comprehensive evaluation of the lease boundary geology and reserves, geotechnical conditions, alternative mining scenarios and impacts, and associated costs, in accordance with Section 3.1 of ID 2001-7 (Section 7.1.3). At least six months prior to the construction of the plant site, submit to the EUB for its review and approval a report documenting efforts that have been taken to optimize the plant site area with respect to the minimization of resource sterilization (Section 7.2.2). At least six months prior to field preparation, submit to the EUB for its review and approval detailed geotechnical designs for all external overburden disposal areas (Section 7.3.2). At least five years prior to mining at the final pit wall but no later than December 31, 2016, submit to the EUB for its review and approval a report evaluating the mineable oil sands ore quality and nonrecoverable quantity in the east final pit wall area adjacent to the Athabasca River, and a detailed geotechnical stability evaluation of the final east pit wall location (Section 7.5.2). Beginning with the September 2004 annual mine plan, submit to the EUB the details of the MOPP testing (Section 7.6.2). At least six months prior to beginning mine depressurization activities, submit to the EUB for its review and approval a monitoring plan to detect basal aquifer pressure changes at the lease boundary with DCEL (Section 7.7.3). On or before February 28 of each year following start-up of mine depressurization activities, or such other date as the EUB may stipulate, submit to the EUB a report on the results of the basal aquifer monitoring program at the lease boundary with DCEL (Section 7.7.3). Within one year of project approval, satisfy the EUB on the need, or otherwise, to monitor the effects of depressurization and injection activities along the northern and western boundary of mining activities (Section 7.7.3). On an annual average basis, limit diluent losses to tailings and the scheme to not more than 4.0 volumes per 1000 volumes of bitumen production, unless it can satisfy the Board that a limit of 4.3 volumes per 1000 volumes of bitumen production is appropriate (Section 8.2.3). Not discharge any untreated froth treatment tailings to the tailings area (Section 8.2.3). Every five years commencing February 28, 2010, or such other date as the EUB may stipulate, submit to the EUB a report on the feasibility of coke use and sales potential (Section 9.13). On or before February 28, 2005, and every year thereafter, or such other date as the EUB may stipulate, submit to the EUB a progress report summarizing
- research and development on solid tailings technologies, and
- modifications to the existing tailings plan to ensure a trafficable landscape, rapid progressive reclamation and to eliminate the need for long-term storage of fluid tailings (Section 10.1.3). Two years prior to planned start-up, or such other date as the EUB may stipulate, submit to the EUB a report summarizing the engineering design and operating plans for the NST system (Section 10.1.3). On or before February 28 of every year following start-up, or such other date or frequency as the EUB may stipulate, submit to the EUB a report summarizing for the preceding year the performance of the NST system, including reasons for deviations from design (Section 10.1.3). Within one year of project approval, satisfy the EUB on the need, or otherwise, to monitor for potential effects of injection activities on the depressurization needs of other developments in the regional study area (Section 12.7). Include in the project area a minimum setback of 250 m from the edge of the wetted width of the Athabasca River during spring flow, excluding the water intake facility (Section 15.6).
Decision 2004-110
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3938
- Applicant
- BA Energy Inc.
- Application Number
- 1347899
- Title
- Decision 2004-110: BA Energy - Prehearing meeting and application to construct and operate an upgrader in Strathcona County
- Date
- 2004
- Title
- Decision 2004-110: BA Energy - Prehearing meeting and application to construct and operate an upgrader in Strathcona County
- Date
- 2004
- Applicant
- BA Energy Inc.
- Application Number
- 1347899
- Hearing Panel
- Berg AJ
- Dilay JD
- Miller GJ
- Hearing Type
- Prehearing
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Construction permit
- Environmental impact
- Guide 31A
- Health
- Interveners cost
- NTS 83F
- Public interest
- Safety
- Strathcona county
- Upgrading
- Legal References
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S28
- EUB Rules of Practice S50
- Interveners
- Northeast Strathcona County Residents
- Astotin Creek Residents' Coaltion
- Government of Alberta
- Shell Canada
- Inter-Pipeline Fund
- Strathcona County Taxpayers Association
- Northwest Upgrading
- Murray J
- Klimek J
- Fitch G
- Moore J
- Stepaniuk D
- Gin G
- Burns G
- Bertsch D
- Location
- 10-15-056-21W4
Decision 2005-31
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3954
- Applicant
- Alberta Electric System Operator
- Application Number
- 1346298
- Title
- Decision 2005-031: Alberta Electric System Operator - needs identification document application Edmonton-Calgary - 500 KV electric transmission facilities
- Date
- 2005
- Title
- Decision 2005-031: Alberta Electric System Operator - needs identification document application Edmonton-Calgary - 500 KV electric transmission facilities
- Date
- 2005
- Applicant
- Alberta Electric System Operator
- Application Number
- 1346298
- Hearing Panel
- McCrank MN
- McManus BT
- DeSorcy GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Utilities
- Category
- Electric power
- Descriptors
- Decision D2004 48
- Electric power plant
- Electric power transmission
- Expansion
- Transmission
- Transmission administrator
- Transmission corridor
- Upgrading
- Legal References
- Electric Utilities Act S34
- Interveners
- AltaLink
- TransAlta Corporation
- TransCanada Energy Ltd and NortherLights Transmission
- AltaGas Power Holdings
- Independent Power Producers
- Luscar Ltd
- ATCO Electric
- Benign Energy Canada
- City of Calgary
- EPCOR
- Industrial Power Consumers Association of Alberta
- Alberta Direct Connect Consumer Association
- Alberta Department of Energy
- Wood D
- City of Lethbidge
- Aboriginal Communities
- Approval
- Approved
Decision 2005-79
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4024
- Applicant
- BA Energy Inc.
- Application Number
- 1347899
- Title
- Decision 2005-079: BA Energy Inc.:Application to construct and operate an upgrader - Strathcona, Fort Saskatchewan
- Date
- 2005
- Title
- Decision 2005-079: BA Energy Inc.:Application to construct and operate an upgrader - Strathcona, Fort Saskatchewan
- Date
- 2005
- Applicant
- BA Energy Inc.
- Application Number
- 1347899
- Hearing Panel
- Berg AJ
- Houlihan RN
- Miller GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- No Hearing
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Construction permit
- Decision D2004-110
- Emergency Response Plan
- Environmental impact
- Fort Saskatchewan field
- Human factor
- NTS 83H
- Operating
- Sulphur recovery
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Upgrading
- Legal References
- Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act
- Interveners
- Northeast Strathcona County Residents
- Astotin Creek Residents' Coalition
- Government of Alberta
- Shell Canada
- Inter-Pipeline Fund
- Strathcona County Taxpayers Association
- Northwest Upgrading
- Murray J
- Veltman H
- Veltman I
- Radke J
- Radke K
- Bartlett T
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- APPENDIX 3 APPROVAL CONDITIONS This section is provided for the convenience of readers. In the event of any difference between the conditions in this section and those in the main body of the decision, the wording in the main body of the decision shall prevail. The following conditions are from Section 7 of the decision report. 1) BA Energy’s application for the use of lime addition technology as the sole means of sulphur recovery for the first phase of the Heartland upgrader is denied. 2) Primary sulphur recovery for the first phase of the Heartland upgrader will be based on Claus sulphur recovery technology, as described by BA Energy in Application No. 1347899. 3) Sulphur recovery for the Heartland upgrader will comply with the sulphur recovery requirements outlined in EUB Interim Directive (ID) 2001-3: Sulphur Recovery Guidelines for the Province of Alberta and any subsequent revisions. 4) Installation of lime addition sulphur technology as a demonstration project for the first phase of the Heartland upgrader is approved. 5) Three months prior to testing of lime addition technology, BA Energy must submit to the Board and to AENV, for their approval, any information that the Board requires and any information that AENV requires. The information that the Board requires must include, as a minimum, an operating plan that details how BA Energy will test its lime addition technology, how it will continue to meet its air emissions limits during the testing period, and how it intends to report its operating results, its air emission performance, and any other operating criteria as requested by AENV or the Board. 6) If BA Energy chooses to install lime addition technology for the first phase of its Heartland upgrader project and it can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Board and AENV its claims as outlined in Application No. 1347899, then the Board, on application by BA Energy, would be prepared to reconsider its decision on sulphur recovery for additional phases of development.
- Location
- ##-10-056-21W4
Decision 2006-112
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4186
- Applicant
- Suncor Energy Inc
- Application Number
- 1391211
- 1391212
- Title
- Decision 2006-112 : Suncor Energy Inc. application for expansion of an oil sands mine (North Steepbank mine extension) and a bitumen upgrading facility (Voyageur Upgrader) in the Fort McMurray area
- Date
- 2006
- Title
- Decision 2006-112 : Suncor Energy Inc. application for expansion of an oil sands mine (North Steepbank mine extension) and a bitumen upgrading facility (Voyageur Upgrader) in the Fort McMurray area
- Date
- 2006
- Applicant
- Suncor Energy Inc
- Application Number
- 1391211
- 1391212
- Hearing Panel
- Dilay JD
- Nichol JR
- McGee TM
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Bitumen
- Environmental impact assessment
- EUB Directive 056
- EUB ID 2001-07
- EUB IL 89-04
- EUB IL 96-07
- Fort McMurray area
- NTS 83H
- Recommendation
- Risk
- Steepbank Mine
- Oil sands project
- Upgrading
- Legal References
- Administrative Procedures and Jurisdiction Act
- Energy Resources Conservation Act
- EUB Rules of Practice
- Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S13
- Interveners
- Athabasca Chipewayan First Nation
- Canadian Natural Resources Limited
- Clearwater River Paul Cree Band #175
- Fort McKay First Nation
- Imperial Oil Resources Ventures Limited
- Mikisew Cree First Nation
- Oil Sands Environmental Coalition
- Shell Canada Limited
- Synenco Energy Inc
- Wood Buffalo First Nation
- Wood Buffalo Metis Locals Association
- Northern Lights Health Region
- Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo
- Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Alberta
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- APPENDIX 2 SUMMARY OF CONDITIONS Conditions generally are requirements in addition to or otherwise expanding upon existing regulations and guidelines. An applicant must comply with conditions or it is in breach of its approval and subject to enforcement action by the EUB. Enforcement of an approval includes enforcement of the conditions attached to that approval. Sanctions imposed for the breach of such conditions may include the suspension of the approval, resulting in the shut-in of a facility. The conditions imposed on the approval are summarized below. In the event that there is a discrepancy between this summary and the condition as set out in the main body of the decision report, the wording in the main body of the report shall prevail.
- Suncor shall submit for EUB approval the detailed geotechnical designs for the External Overburden Disposal structure and the In-pit Overburden Disposal structure along the Steepbank River at least six months prior to field preparation in these areas.
- Suncor shall submit for EUB approval a finalized plan for mining at the lease boundary between the NSME and Lease 29 five years prior to mining at this lease boundary. The plan should address the lack of drilling information on Lease 29 and contain a comprehensive evaluation of the lease boundary geology and reserves, geotechnical conditions, alternative mining scenarios and impacts, and associated costs, in accordance with Section 3.1 of ID 2001-07.
- Suncor shall meet a lower requirement for its annual diluent losses. The lower diluent loss limit of 4.0 volumes of diluent per thousand volumes of bitumen will take effect November 1, 2008.
- Suncor shall not mine oil sands from the North Steepbank Mine Extension that meet the requirements under ID 2001-07 until - it meets a CT efficiency of 76 per cent on a quarterly basis not later than the first quarter of 2009, - Pond 8 tailings storage is available for the deposition of CT, and - commercial CT production commences from the Millennium Extraction Plant.
- Suncor shall provide to the Board detailed information on the ability of the CT stored in its tailings ponds to provide a trafficable surface for reclamation. This information should include annual pond surveys, sampling data, vane shear testing, and other information as specified by the Board.
- Suncor shall provide detailed plans on the incorporation of supplementary tailings techniques to reduce Suncor’s MFT inventory in its annual tailings plan beginning in 2007.
- Suncor shall provide an annual update of its efforts to coordinate mine planning and closure with other operators in terms of landform design, drainage, and material balances as part of its annual mine plan reporting.
Decision 2006-114
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4188
- Applicant
- Alberta Electric System Operator
- Application Number
- 1439224
- 1443360
- 1431899
- 1445441
- 1441569
- 1439596
- Title
- Decision 2006-114 : Alberta Electric System Operator, needs identification document application, Edmonton-Calgary, 500 kV electric transmission facilities : Request for review and variance of Decision 2005-031
- Date
- 2006
- Title
- Decision 2006-114 : Alberta Electric System Operator, needs identification document application, Edmonton-Calgary, 500 kV electric transmission facilities : Request for review and variance of Decision 2005-031
- Date
- 2006
- Applicant
- Alberta Electric System Operator
- Application Number
- 1439224
- 1443360
- 1431899
- 1445441
- 1441569
- 1439596
- Hearing Panel
- McManus BT
- Dilay JD
- McGee TM
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Utilities
- Category
- Electric power
- Descriptors
- Decision D2004-048
- Decision D2005-031
- Deregulation
- Electric power plant
- Electric power transmission
- Expansion
- Indians of North America
- Transmission
- Transmission administrator
- Transmission corridor
- Upgrading
- Legal References
- Electric Utilities Act S34
- EUB Rules of Practice
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act
- Public Utilities Board Act
- Interveners
- United Power Transmission Area Groups (UPTAG)
- Buss K
- Jeffs A
- Lavesta Area Group
- Bodnar J
- Lochend to Langdon Group (LLPG)
- Laycraft JB
- 566 Corridor Group
- Alberta Electric System Operator (AESO)
- Smellie JA
- Nettleton GM
- AltaLink Management Ltd.
- Block R
- ATCO Electric Ltd.
- Keogh L
- Munro S
- First Nations
- Graves J
- Benign Energy Canada Inc.
- Hansford HR
- City of Calgary
- Evanchuck DI
- Semenchuk L
- EPCOR Utilities Inc.
- Crowther D
- Industrial Power Consumers Association of Alberta (IPCAA)
- MacNamara DB
- Industrial Power Producers Society of Alberta (IPPSA)
- Slager A
- Approval
- Approved
Decision 2007-42
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4223
- Applicant
- Terasen Pipelines (Corridor) Inc.
- Application Number
- 1451729
- Title
- Decision 2007-042: Terasen Pipelines (Corridor) Inc. application for a pipeline lincence and associated pipeline installation Scotford upgrader to Trans Mountain pipeline terminal
- Date
- 2007
- Title
- Decision 2007-042: Terasen Pipelines (Corridor) Inc. application for a pipeline lincence and associated pipeline installation Scotford upgrader to Trans Mountain pipeline terminal
- Date
- 2007
- Applicant
- Terasen Pipelines (Corridor) Inc.
- Application Number
- 1451729
- Hearing Panel
- Dilay JD
- McGee TM
- Willard RJ
- Hearing Type
- No Hearing
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Crude oil
- Pipeline licence
- Transportation
- Upgrading
- Legal References
- Pipeline Act Part 4
- Notes
- Pipeline route was amended
- Interveners
- Wright A
- Simmons H
- Approval
- Approved
- Location
- 07-31-055-21W4
- 03-05-053-23W4
Decision 2007-58
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4236
- Applicant
- North West Upgrading Inc.
- Application Number
- 1444141
- Title
- Decision 2007-058: North West Upgrading Inc. application to construct and operate an oil sands upgrader in Sturgeon County
- Date
- 2007
- Title
- Decision 2007-058: North West Upgrading Inc. application to construct and operate an oil sands upgrader in Sturgeon County
- Date
- 2007
- Applicant
- North West Upgrading Inc.
- Application Number
- 1444141
- Hearing Panel
- Dilay JD
- Warren WA
- Boyler DK
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Descriptors
- Oil sands
- Upgrading
- Sturgeon county
- Legal References
- Water Act
- Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S49
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S26
- Administrative Procedures and Jurisdiction Act
- Municipal Government Act
- Oil Sands Conservation Regulation S49
- Climate Change and Emissions Management Act
- Interveners
- Northeast Sturgeon County Industrial Landowners (NESCIL)
- Citizens For Responsible Development (CFRD)
- Blake D.
- Brown A.
- Chichak D.
- Chichak M.
- Cholewa s.
- Cholewa T.
- Goodwin V.
- Groot W.
- Kiriak R.
- Martin L.
- Meijer R.
- Nkemdirim L.
- Shaw K.
- City of Edmonton
- Brostrom M.
- Riopel J.
- Tsounis P.
- Vanderwel D.
- Environment Canada (EC)
- Fox D.
- Letchford F.
- Mintz R.
- Norton M.
- Watt C.
- Smith L.
- Smith R.
- SV Half Diamond Ranch, SV Farms Ltd.
- Smulski K.
- Friends of Lamont County (FOLC)
- Maschmeyer D.
- Schneider W.
- Alexander First Nation (AFN)
- Arcand J.
- Paul A.
- Council of Canadians (COC)
- Gorman L.
- Onoway River Valley Conservation Association (ORVCA)
- Northcott M.
- Skinner I.
- Saddle Lake Cree Nation (SLCN)
- Brertton D.
- Government of Alberta
- Shell Canada Ltd.
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- APPENDIX 2 SUMMARY OF COMMITMENTS COMMITMENTS BY NORTH WEST UPGRADING INC. Water Air ERP Noise Sulphur Traffic Liability Socioeconomic Light APPENDIX 3 APPROVAL CONDITIONS CONDITIONS
Decision 2008-24
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4280
- Applicant
- Petro-Canada Oil Sands Inc.
- Application Number
- 1490956
- Title
- Decision 2008-024: Petro-Canada Oil Sands Inc. application to construct and operate the Sturgeon upgrader Sturgeon County
- Date
- 2008
- Title
- Decision 2008-024: Petro-Canada Oil Sands Inc. application to construct and operate the Sturgeon upgrader Sturgeon County
- Date
- 2008
- Applicant
- Petro-Canada Oil Sands Inc.
- Application Number
- 1490956
- Hearing Panel
- Dilay JD
- Miller GJ
- McManus BT
- Hearing Type
- Prehearing
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Environmental impact
- Groundwater
- Surface water
- Air quality
- Soil
- Vegetation
- Wildlife
- Noise reduction
- Health
- Safety
- Emergency response plan
- Economic analysis
- Socio-economic effect
- Sturgeon County
- Upgrading
- Oil sands
- Legal References
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S11
- Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act
- Water Act S36
- Water Act S37
- Water Act S49
- Water Act S50
- Interveners
- Alexander First Nations Industrial Relations Corporation (AFN IRC)
- Northeast Sturgeon County Industrial Landowners (NESCIL) and the Citizens for Responsible Development (CFRD)
- Shaw S
- Shaw K
- Statoil Hydro Canada
- Norh West Upgrading
- Suncor Energy Inc.
- S.V. Farms, S.V. Half Diamond Ranch, 267554 Alberta Ltd., and the J.Smulski Estate
- Hoehn R
- Total E&P Canada Ltd.
- Wright A
- Approval
- No approval required
- Location
- 00-19-056-21W4
- 00-02-056-21W4
- 00-03-056-21W4
- 00-10-056-21W4
- 00-11-056-21W4
- 00-12-056-21W4
- 00-13-056-21W4
- 00-14-056-21W4
- 00-15-056-21W4
- 00-22-056-21W4
- 00-23-056-21W4
- 00-24-056-21W4
- 00-25-056-21W4
- 00-26-056-21W4
- 00-27-056-21W4
Decision 2018-003
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4558
- Applicant
- Value Creations Inc.
- Application Number
- 1861615
- 005-203303
- Title
- Decision 2018-003: Value Creation Inc. applications to amend the Heartland Upgrader project approvals Alberta's industrial Heartland Area
- Date
- 2018
- Title
- Decision 2018-003: Value Creation Inc. applications to amend the Heartland Upgrader project approvals Alberta's industrial Heartland Area
- Date
- 2018
- Applicant
- Value Creations Inc.
- Application Number
- 1861615
- 005-203303
- Hearing Panel
- Chiasson C
- McManus RC
- Ternes LJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Air quality
- Environmental impact
- Land use
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 83H
- Sulphur recovery
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Upgrading
- Legal References
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S11
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S13
- Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act
- Responsible Energy Development Act (REDA)
- Approval
- Approved
- Location
- ##-10-056-21W4