50 records – page 1 of 3.

Decision 76-11

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2153
Applicant
Alberta Oil Sands Pipeline Ltd.
Application Number
9138
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Oil Sands Pipeline Ltd., 1976 (oil line from Fort McMurray to Edmonton)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Oil Sands Pipeline Ltd., 1976 (oil line from Fort McMurray to Edmonton)
Date
1976
Applicant
Alberta Oil Sands Pipeline Ltd.
Application Number
9138
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Berkowitz N
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Fort McMurray area
Manufactured crude oil
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Mildred Lake project
NTS 74D
NTS 83H
NTS 83I
NTS 83P
Pipeline route
Route selection
Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Transportation corridor
Legal References
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
Decision 76-11 on application No. 9138 to construct an oil line to transport synthetic crude from Syncrude's Mildred Lake plant to the interprovincial pipeline terminal in Edmonton.
Interveners
Albersun Pipeline Ltd.
CU Engineering Limited
Less detail

Decision 79-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2094
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Application Number
770666
780578
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., 1979 (permit to construct a pipeline from Joffre to Fort Saskatchewan)
Date
1979
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., 1979 (permit to construct a pipeline from Joffre to Fort Saskatchewan)
Date
1979
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Application Number
770666
780578
Hearing Panel
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Ethylene
Fort Saskatchewan area
Product pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
NTS 83H
Pipeline route
Route selection
Safety
Transportation corridor
Urban development
Notes
Decision 79-2 on application No. 770666 to construct a pipeline to transmit ethylene from Joffre to Fort Saskatchewan (earlier hearing 1978-03-15 resulted in Decision D78-7 and approval by permit No. 14763 of pipeline except that portion in TP.53, R.22-23, W4M) and on application No. 780578 to cancel permit No. 14763 as it relates to pipeline route through TP.52 and for approval of new route through this area which would locate the pipeline adjacent to the eastern boundary of the Sherwood Park west restricted development area (TP.52-53, R.22-23, W4M).
Interveners
Windsor, G.
Kahlke, E.
Reid, T.
Shaw, J.
Sutter, H.
Stannard, S.
Losty, J.
Genstar Development Company Ltd.
Mohawk Oil Company Limited
Less detail

Decision 79-11

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2085
Applicant
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
780379
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., 1979 (permit to construct a pipeline near Okotoks)
Date
1979
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., 1979 (permit to construct a pipeline near Okotoks)
Date
1979
Applicant
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
780379
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Gathering line
Okotoks area
Okotoks field
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Historical resources impact assessment
NTS 82I
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Route selection
Safety
Transportation corridor
Urban development
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 79-11 on application No. 780379 to construct a secondary pipeline near Okotoks to transport sour natural gas from a proposed well in LSD 11-17-20-28 W4M to an existing gathering system at a point in LSD 14-36-20-29 W4M; heard with well licence application No. 790337; see Decision 79-9 on well licence application
Interveners
Schmautz, E.
LeDuc, A.S.
LeDuc, L.T.
Payne, L.
Less detail

Decision 80-21

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2018
Applicant
Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
Application Number
800462
800490
800433
800492
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited, 1980 (permits to construct pipelines for the transmission of natural gas - Calgary area)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited, 1980 (permits to construct pipelines for the transmission of natural gas - Calgary area)
Date
1980
Applicant
Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
Application Number
800462
800490
800433
800492
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Calgary area
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
NTS 82J
Pipeline route
Transportation corridor
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 80-21 on application No. 800462 to construct pipeline to transport natural gas from existing AGTL line in LSD 15-20-22-3 W5M to proposed regulator station in LSD 16-19-22-1 W5M (Priddis lateral A), on application No. 800490 to construct proposed regulator station (Turner Valley GATE station), on application No. 800433 to construct pipeline to transport gas from proposed regulator station in LSD 16-19-22-1 W5M to proposed regulator station in LSD 13-23-22-1 W5M (Priddis lateral B) and on application No. 800492 for this regulator station in LSD 13-23-22-1 W5M (south Calgary GATE station); Board hearing 1980-09-09/10/23/24 ; see related Decision 81-27 on later application for similar facilities
Interveners
R.Z. Holdings Ltd.
Hartel Holdings Co. Ltd.
Ulster Developments Ltd.
Paperny, M.
Trafalgar Investments Ltd.
Arnold Investments Ltd.
Rogers Pass Recreation Ltd.
Southern, F.D.
Southern, R.D.
Spruce Meadows Complex
Rauh, W.
Rauh, F.
Hope-Ross Group
Big Springs Ranch Ltd.
Brooks, D.
Brooks, M.
Caywood, E.
Drager, J.C.
French, B.
Gordon, E.L.
Hope-Ross, R.M.
Hope-Ross, W.
Klyuzak, A.G.
Sweeney, E.A.
Sweeney, E.G.
Van Wielingen, G.A.
Drager, J.M.
Southern, S.D.
Arthurs, A.G.
Waddell, W.A.
Approval
Denied
Less detail

Decision 80-30

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2009
Applicant
Alberta Products Pipe Line Limited
Application Number
800440
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Products Pipe Line Ltd., 1980 (permit to construct a pipeline from Edmonton to Calgary)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Products Pipe Line Ltd., 1980 (permit to construct a pipeline from Edmonton to Calgary)
Date
1980
Applicant
Alberta Products Pipe Line Limited
Application Number
800440
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Calgary area
Edmonton area
Petroleum product
Pipeline construction permit
Pipeline project
Product pipeline
Red Deer area
Capacity
Demand (economics)
Environmental impact
NTS 82P
NTS 83A
NTS 83H
Pipeline crossing
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Right of way
Route selection
Supply (economics)
Transmission corridor
Transportation corridor
Notes
Decision 80-30 on application No. 800440 to construct a pipeline to transport gasolines, diesel fuel, aviation fuels, solvents, and heating oil from a pump station in Edmonton to existing facilities in Calgary (TP.23-53, 23-29, W4M); Board hearing 1980-09-23/26; see related Decisions 81-31 and 81-34 for Decisions on specific segments of route that were matters of concern
Interveners
County of Lacombe No. 14
Daines Farms Ltd.
Paul S. Seiferling
Battle River Regional Planning Commission
City of Edmonton
Turbo Resources Ltd.
Crows Nest Resources Ltd.
Daon Corporation
Less detail

Decision 81-19

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1989
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
800741
800742
800883
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Shell Canada Limited, 1981 (permits to construct pipelines and related facilities Edmonton-Skaro area)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Shell Canada Limited, 1981 (permits to construct pipelines and related facilities Edmonton-Skaro area)
Date
1981
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
800741
800742
800883
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Bitumen
Butane
Condensate
Edmonton area
Liquefied petroleum gas
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Product pipeline
Propane
Environmental impact
NTS 83H
Pipeline construction
Pipeline route
Right of way
Route selection
Transportation corridor
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 81-19 on application No. 800741, 800742 by AEC to construct pipeline to transport crude bitumen condensate blend from Skaro area to refinery area in Edmonton and an adjacent pipeline to transport condensate in reverse direction and on application No. 800883 by Shell to transport & distribute products from planned refinery near Scotford to Edmonton interprovincial pipeline terminal area (TP.52-57, R.19-23, W4M); see related Decisions 81-7 and 81-29
Interveners
First City Developments Ltd.
Marler, M.
Edmonton Regional Planning Commission
Shirvell, C.S.
Simmons, H.
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Less detail

Decision 81-29

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1979
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
810385
Title
Decision report 81-29: Inquiry report northeast Edmonton pipeline corridor inquiry
Date
1981
Title
Decision report 81-29: Inquiry report northeast Edmonton pipeline corridor inquiry
Date
1981
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
810385
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Land use
Inquiry - Pipelines
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Energy development
Pipeline
Regional planning
Transmission corridor
Transportation corridor
Urban development
Environmental impact
Land use
NTS 83H
Pipeline route
Planning
Route selection
Safety
Notes
Decision 81-29 on proceeding No. 810385 to inquire into and report on the most desirable route for a pipeline corridor in NE Edmonton (from Sherwood Park west) and Edmonton restricted development areas north of CNR Marshalling Yards to a point near HWY 21 and width of corridor (all in TP.53-54, R.22-23, W4M); Board inquiry 1981-09-15/16 see related Decisions 81-7 and 81-19
Interveners
Alberta Energy Company Limited
The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Canada Cement Lafarge Limited
Canadian Petroleum Association
City of Edmonton
County of Strathcona No. 20
Daon Development Corporation
Dome Petroleum Limited
Edmonton Regional Planning Commission
Genstar Development Company
Imperial Oil Limited
Esso Resources Canada Ltd.
Jackson, D.F.
Jackson, H.
Jackson, R.
Johannes Prinz Von Thurn und Taxis
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Ram Holdings Co. Ltd.
Shell Canada Limited
Stewart, Weir, Stewart, Watson, Heinrichs & Dixon
Thickwood Holdings Alberta Ltd.
Turbo Resources Limited
Van Hecke, A.
Van Hecke, C.
Less detail

Decision 81-34

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1974
Applicant
Alberta Products Pipe Line Limited
Application Number
810460
810461
810462
810513
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Products Pipe Line Ltd., 1981 (permit to construct deferred portions of a pipeline - Edmonton to Calgary)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Products Pipe Line Ltd., 1981 (permit to construct deferred portions of a pipeline - Edmonton to Calgary)
Date
1981
Applicant
Alberta Products Pipe Line Limited
Application Number
810460
810461
810462
810513
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Pipeline construction permit
Product pipeline
Red Deer area
Coal deposit
Energy development
Land use
NTS 83A
NTS 83H
Pipeline route
Right of way
Route selection
Transportation corridor
Legal References
Pipeline Act S34
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 81-34 on application No. 810460, 810461, 810462 and 810513 for segments of pipeline approved under permit 189419 (TP.44-46, R.26 W4M TP.47-48, R.25-26, W4M and TP.50-53, R.23-25, W4M) Board hearing 1981-10-21/22/23 see related ERCB Decisions 80-30 and 81-31
Interveners
City of Edmonton
County of Lacombe No. 14
Daon Development Corporation
Landowners - Alternative Route
Schotte, A.
Town of Lacombe
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision 83-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2392
Applicant
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Application Number
820934
820935
Title
Decision on application by Union Carbide Canada Limited, 1983 (applications for permits to construct ethylene glycol pipelines from Prentiss to Blackfalds)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Union Carbide Canada Limited, 1983 (applications for permits to construct ethylene glycol pipelines from Prentiss to Blackfalds)
Date
1983
Applicant
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Application Number
820934
820935
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Blackfalds area
Ethylene glycol
Pipeline construction permit
Prentiss area
Product pipeline
Agricultural land
Environmental impact
Land reclamation
Locating
NTS 83A
Petrochemical industry
Pipeline route
Railroad
Route selection
Safety
Socio-economic effect
Terminal facility
Transportation cost
Legal References
Pipeline Regulation S2
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision No. D83-3 on application No. 820934 to construct 18.5 km of 114.3 MM outside diameter stainless steel pipeline for transmission of polyester grade ethylene glycol from plant in LSD 14-30-39-25 W4M to proposed Blackfalds railcar loading terminal in LSD 11-26-39-27 W4M and on application No. 820935 to construct 18.5 km of 168.3 MM outside diameter carbon steel pipeline to transmit antifreeze grade ethylene glycol from plant to terminal; Board hearing 1983-02-15/16
Interveners
Preserve Agricultural Land
Blackfalds Mobile Park Ltd.
Holland, J.
Holland, Mrs.J.
Holland, L.
Holland, Mrs. L.
CP Rail
Town of Blackfalds
Blackfalds and District Chamber of Commerce
Johnstone, D.
Less detail

Decision 83-A

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2466
Applicant
McLeod River Coal Ltd.
Application Number
820294
Title
Decision on application by McLeod River Coal Ltd., 1983 (McLeod River coal project, Hinton)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by McLeod River Coal Ltd., 1983 (McLeod River coal project, Hinton)
Date
1983
Applicant
McLeod River Coal Ltd.
Application Number
820294
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Strom NA
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Coal
Descriptors
Coal mine
Coal preparation plant
Coal project
Coalspur coal field
Hinton area
McLeod River coal project
Surface mining
Air quality
Bituminous coal
Capitalized cost
Coal reserve
Cost analysis
Design criteria
Drainage
Dust control
Economic analysis
Employment
Environment protection
Environmental impact
Groundwater
Land reclamation
Land use
Manpower
Marketing
Mine design
NTS 83F
Open pit mining
Operating cost
Overburden ratio
Railroad
Reforestation
Socio-economic effect
Soil conservation
Tailings
Tailings - storage
Terminal facility
Thermal coal
Transportation corridor
Waste disposal
Water quality
Legal References
Coal Conservation Act S10
Coal Conservation Act S23
Notes
ERCB report D83-A on application No. 820294 to develop a surface coal mine in TP.49-51, R.21-23, W5 to extract high volatile C bituminous coal from NW portion of Coalspur coal field and to construct a coal processing plant in TP.51-52, R23-24, W5; Board hearing 1982-08-24/25/26/27
Less detail

Decision 83-D

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2417
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Title
Coal branch regional growth study
Date
1983
Title
Coal branch regional growth study
Date
1983
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Category
Coal
Descriptors
Alberta Coal Branch
Edson area
Energy development
Forecasting
Hinton area
Regional planning
Boom town
Economic forecasting
Employment
NTS 83F
Population growth
Services
Socio-economic effect
Socio-economic impact assessment
Transportation
Notes
ERCB report 83-D on a study on the impacts of proposed resource development in the coal branch area (TP.47-55, R.16-26, W5M)
Less detail

Decision 84-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2267
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
821051
Title
Decision 84-01: Requirements for major electric transmission lines in the Edmonton area: Inquiry
Date
1984
Title
Decision 84-01: Requirements for major electric transmission lines in the Edmonton area: Inquiry
Date
1984
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
821051
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Inquiry
Transmission line
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Electric power transmission
Transmission line
Electric power demand
Land use
NTS 83H
Planning
Regional planning
Route selection
Transmission corridor
Transportation corridor
Notes
Decision D84-1 on Board inquiry (proceeding No. 821051) for transmission lines in the Edmonton area (covering TP.50-56, R.20-26, W4M); Board hearing 1983-07-05/06
Interveners
Electric Utility Planning Council
Edmonton Metropolitan Regional Planning Commission
Stewart, Weir & Co.
Transport Canada
City of Edmonton
City of St. Albert
TransAlta Utilities Corporation
Alberta Government Telephones
Less detail

Decision 85-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1689
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
841072
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1985 (Jumping Pound sulphur forming project)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1985 (Jumping Pound sulphur forming project)
Date
1985
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
841072
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Goodman CJ
Paterson RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Sulphur
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Sulphur
Environmental impact
Export
Noise (sound)
NTS 82O
Pollution
Producing
Railroad
Safety
Transportation
Truck
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S15.050
Notes
Decision D85-2 on application No. 841072 to construct and operate sulphur forming facilities using rotoform process at its Jumping Pound gas plant in section 13-25-5 W5M.
Interveners
Copithorne, R.A.
Rhodes, C.H.
Less detail

Decision 85-07

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1685
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Application Number
840736
840986
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1985 (reduced well spacing and cleaning plant Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1985 (reduced well spacing and cleaning plant Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Application Number
840736
840986
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Spacing
Descriptors
Drilling spacing unit
In situ
Industrial plant
Lindbergh area
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Bitumen
Cleaning
Community relations
Contamination
Cummings Fm
Directional well
Environmental impact
Groundwater
Monitoring
Noise (sound)
NTS 73E
Oil pipeline
Solid hydrocarbon
Transportation
Truck
Water disposal
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.002
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.030
Notes
Decision D85-7 on application No. 840736 and No. 840986 to reduce well spacing for primary recovery from Cummings zone-Cold Lake-Wabiskaw-McMurray oil sands deposit and to construct and operate a cleaning plant to handle hydrocarbon production trucked from various PanCanadian wells (in section 3-56-6 W4M); Board hearing 84-12-11/12; resulted in Order No. Misc 8501
Interveners
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Shymkiw, J.
Shymkiw, Mrs.J.
Shymkiw, H.
Shymikiw, Mrs.H.
Kozicky, C.
Kozicky, Mrs.C.
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Group of Elk Point-Lindbergh Area Residents
Town of Elk Point
County of St. Paul
Less detail

Decision 86-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision901
Applicant
Societe Quebecoise D'initiatives Petrolieres
Application Number
850758
Title
Decision on application by Societe Quebecoise D'initiatives Petrolieres, 1986 (to amend gas removal permit)
Date
1986
Title
Decision on application by Societe Quebecoise D'initiatives Petrolieres, 1986 (to amend gas removal permit)
Date
1986
Applicant
Societe Quebecoise D'initiatives Petrolieres
Application Number
850758
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Warne GA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas removal
Descriptors
Gas removal
Alberta
Contract
Economic analysis
Government hearing
Marketing
Natural gas
Quebec
Revision
Transportation cost
Legal References
Gas Resources Preservation Act S10
Notes
Decision D86-1 on application No. 850758 to amend gas removal permit SQ 83-1 to increase total volume, annual volume and maximum daily volume, and add Bonnie Glen, Ferrybank, Gilby and Westerose fields to list from which gas may be obtained for removal. additional volumes requested to satisfy increased demand on system of Gaz Inter-Cite Quebec in Drummondville area and on Gas Metropolitain Inc. in Montreal area; adjourned and reconvened 1986-01-07
Also refered to as GR 86-1 (Gas removal decison)
Interveners
Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd.
Brenda Mines Ltd.
Independent Petroleum Association of Canada
Trans Canada PipeLines Limited
Less detail

Decision 86-18

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision526
Applicant
Fording Coal Limited
Application Number
860664
Title
Decision on application by Fording Coal Limited, 1986 (Cassils railway siding for shipment of bulk coal samples)
Date
1986
Title
Decision on application by Fording Coal Limited, 1986 (Cassils railway siding for shipment of bulk coal samples)
Date
1986
Applicant
Fording Coal Limited
Application Number
860664
Hearing Panel
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Coal
Descriptors
Brooks area
Coal
Coal handling
Coal mine
Terminal facility
Transportation
Dust control
Environmental impact
Noise (sound)
NTS 82I
Monitoring
Pollution
Railroad
Safety
Truck
Legal References
Coal Conservation Act
Notes
Decision D86-18 on application No. 860664 for a public hearing to decide on the use of Cassils railway siding for shipment of bulk samples of raw coal.
Interveners
Scott, R.C.
Cassils Community Group
Less detail

Decision 87-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision218
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
861525
870045
870046
870047
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Limited, 1987 (approval of the transportation and processing of high hydrogen sulphide sour gas reserves in the Caroline field and area, Bearberry demonstration project)
Date
1987
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Limited, 1987 (approval of the transportation and processing of high hydrogen sulphide sour gas reserves in the Caroline field and area, Bearberry demonstration project)
Date
1987
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
861525
870045
870046
870047
Hearing Panel
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Fox EG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Caroline field
Caroline gas project
Gas pipeline
Gas processing plant
Gathering line
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Sulphur
Sulphur recovery
Community relations
Design criteria
Emission
Environmental impact
IL-80-24
Locating
NTS 82O
Phase behavior
Pilot scale
Plant design
Safety
Sulphur content
Transportation system
Truck
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S15.050
Notes
Decision D87-8 on application No. 861525, 870045, 870046, and 870047 for a demonstration project to improve sulfur recovery; the project is to last five years and is designed to establish the technical and economic feasibility of commercial development.
Interveners
Bauman, L.
Bauman, J.
Newsham, C.
Less detail

Decision 87-13

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision200
Applicant
Federated Pipe Lines Ltd.
Application Number
870677
Title
Decision on application by Federated Pipe Lines Ltd., 1987 (to construct a pipeline and related facilities Bonnie Glen to Acheson)
Date
1987
Title
Decision on application by Federated Pipe Lines Ltd., 1987 (to construct a pipeline and related facilities Bonnie Glen to Acheson)
Date
1987
Applicant
Federated Pipe Lines Ltd.
Application Number
870677
Hearing Panel
Strom NA
Goodman CJ
Prince JP
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Bonnie Glen field
Gas pipeline
High pressure
Liquefied natural gas
Pipeline construction permit
Emergency procedure
Encroachment
Locating
NTS 83H
Pipeline route
Recreational facility
Route selection
Safety
Transportation corridor
Urban development
Legal References
Pipeline Act S8
Notes
Decision D87-13 on application No. 870677 to construct a pipeline to transport high Vapor pressure (HVP) products from the Texaco Canada Bonnie Glen gas plant in LSD 5-17-47-27 W4M to a recently-constructed Federated pipeline terminated near Acheson in LSD 6-2-53-26 W4M; Board hearing 1987-07-28/29; hearing reopened 1987-11-12 to consider evidence directly relating to the concrete coating thickness
Interveners
Chevron Canada Resources Limited
Home Oil Company Limited
Erikson, L.B.
Parkland Rural Residents Association
Morrison, T.
Location
05-17-047-27W4
06-02-053-26W4
Less detail

Decision 87-16

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision196
Applicant
Fording Coal Limited
Application Number
861524
Title
Examiner report on application by Fording Coal Limited, 1987 (permit application for a surface coal mine in the Brooks field)
Date
1987
Title
Examiner report on application by Fording Coal Limited, 1987 (permit application for a surface coal mine in the Brooks field)
Date
1987
Applicant
Fording Coal Limited
Application Number
861524
Hearing Panel
Evans RG
Brushett ER
Fox EG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Coal
Descriptors
Brooks coal field
Coal mine
Coal project
Surface mining
Coal handling
NTS 82I
Transportation
Legal References
Coal Conservation Act S10
Notes
Examiners report E87-16 on application No. 861524 to develop a surface coal mining operation southwest of Brooks in the Brooks Coalfield at Bow City mine (TP.17, R.17, W4M) and Antelope Coulee mine. only the portion of application dealing with Bow City mine approved
Interveners
Eastern Irrigation District
Approval
Approved (partial)
Less detail

Decision 87-17

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision195
Applicant
Gulf Canada Corporation
Application Number
871017
871018
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Corporation, 1987 (permits to construct pipelines to transport sour gas and fuel gas in the Caroline area)
Date
1987
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Corporation, 1987 (permits to construct pipelines to transport sour gas and fuel gas in the Caroline area)
Date
1987
Applicant
Gulf Canada Corporation
Application Number
871017
871018
Hearing Panel
Strom NA
Antonio HA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Caroline area
Caroline field
Caroline gas project
Energy development
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Environmental impact
NTS 83B
Pipeline route
Route selection
Transportation corridor
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S2
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S4
Pipeline Act Part 4
Pipeline Act S4
Notes
Decision D87-17 on application No. 871017 to construct 15.9 km of 168.3 MM O.D. pipeline and related facilities to transport sour gas with a maximum H2S content of 450 moles per Kilomole from an existing well in LSD 3-36-35-5 W5M and on application No. 871018 to construct 13.5 km of 88.9 MM O.D. pipeline to transport fuel gas from an existing Gulf pipeline tie-in point in LSD 8-34-35-5 W5M to the well.
Interveners
Shell Canada Limited
Union Pacific Resources Inc.
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Dome Petroleum Limited
DeKalb Petroleum Corporation
Hall, W.
Location
03-36-035-05W5
08-34-035-05W5
Less detail

50 records – page 1 of 3.