18 records – page 1 of 1.

Decision 59-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2500
Applicant
Alberta Technical Committee
Richfield Oil Corporation
Alberta. Dept. of Mines and Minerals
Title
Decision report 59-05: Report to the Minister of Mines and Minerals and the Oil and Gas Conservation Board with respect to an experiment proposed by Richfield Oil Corporation
Date
1959
Title
Decision report 59-05: Report to the Minister of Mines and Minerals and the Oil and Gas Conservation Board with respect to an experiment proposed by Richfield Oil Corporation
Date
1959
Applicant
Alberta Technical Committee
Richfield Oil Corporation
Alberta. Dept. of Mines and Minerals
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Athabasca oil sands
Nuclear explosion
Project oilsand
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Feasibility
Report
Notes
ERCB report 59-5, although not a report of the Oil and Gas Conservation Board, was distributed by the ERCB (and given an ERCB report number)
Kept behind circulation desk
Related background documents not available
Less detail

Decision 79-E

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2340
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
770866
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Section 43 and Coal Conservation Act, Section 27)
Date
1979
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Section 43 and Coal Conservation Act, Section 27)
Date
1979
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
770866
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Berkowitz N
Bohme VE
Solodzuk W
Isbister WD
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cold Lake area
Cold Lake heavy oil project
Heavy oil project
Steam injection
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Viscous oil recovery
Benefit cost analysis
Bituminous deposit
Coal - fuel
Environmental impact
IL-OG-74-05
Flexicoking
Industrial development permit
Manufactured crude oil
Material balance
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 73L
Recovery factor
Reserve
Socio-economic effect
Upgrading
Waste disposal
Waste water
Water supply
Well spacing
Legal References
Coal Conservation Act S27
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S43
Notes
ERCB Report 79-E on application no. 770866 to produce and upgrade crude bitumen and for an industrial development permit to use coal as a fuel for the project (TP.64-65, R.3-4, W4M); Board hearing 1978-09-05 adjourned to 1978-12-04 through 1978-12-20 and 1979-01-03 through 1979-01-08 and 1979-05-29/30/31; Report 81-C on application (Application no. 800664) to change makeup fuel and ERCB Decision D83-21 for later application (No. 830620) for phased development of the project
Less detail

Decision 81-23

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1985
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
810416
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1981 (Dome Lindbergh experimental scheme)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1981 (Dome Lindbergh experimental scheme)
Date
1981
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
810416
Hearing Type
Board
No Hearing
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Heavy oil project
In situ
Lindbergh field
Thermal recovery
Viscous oil recovery
Waterflooding
NTS 73E
Pilot scale
Notes
Decision 81-23 on application No. 810416 for experimental scheme for recovery of heavy oil in the Lindbergh field in section 18-55-5 W4M using combination thermal drives (fireflood & waterflood); no hearing
Less detail

Decision 81-C

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2319
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
800664
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1981 make-up fuel ESSO Cold Lake Project (natural gas vs coal as make-up fuel)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1981 make-up fuel ESSO Cold Lake Project (natural gas vs coal as make-up fuel)
Date
1981
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
800664
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cold Lake area
Cold Lake heavy oil project
Cyclic steam injection
Heavy oil project
In situ
Steam injection
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Boiler
Coal - fuel
Coal gasification
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
ERCB 79-E
Fuel consumption
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 73L
Recovery factor
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S40
Notes
ERCB report 81-C on application No. 800664 to use natural gas as make-up fuel rather than coal; Board hearing 1980-10-08/09/10 see also ERCB report 79-E for original Decision on Cold Lake project, Decision D83-21 for Decision on later application (No. 830620) for phased development of the project, Decision D84-6 on application to proceed with phases 3&4 and Decision D85-17 on application to proceed with phases 5&6.
Less detail

Decision 83-21

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2309
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
830620
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1983 (phased development of the Cold Lake oil sands project)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1983 (phased development of the Cold Lake oil sands project)
Date
1983
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
830620
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Berkowitz N
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cold Lake area
Cold Lake heavy oil project
Cyclic steam injection
Heavy oil project
In situ
Steam injection
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Clearwater Fm
Environmental impact
NTS 73L
Revision
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision D83-21 on application No. 830620 to amend approval to allow for phased development of the Cold Lake oil sands project (TP.64-66, R.3-4 W4M); see also ERCB report 79-E for Decision on original application, ERCB report 81-C for Decision on application to amend scheme by using natural gas as make-up fuel, Decision D84-16 on application to proceed with phases 3 & 4 and Decision D85-17 on application to proceed with phases 5 & 6
Interveners
Grand Centre and District Chamber of Commerce
Bonnyville and District Chamber of Commerce
Cold Lake Development Committee
Northern Alberta Development Council
Lakeland College
Basic Group of Companies
Alberta Trappers Central Association - Bonnyville & Cold Lake Local
BP Exploration Canada Ltd.
Shell Canada Resources Ltd.
Chief and Council of Cold Lake Indian Band
Tribal Chiefs Association of North Eastern Alberta
Saskatchewan Environment
Alberta Attorney General
Less detail

Decision 84-26

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1148
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Application Number
831102
Title
Examiners report on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1984 (experimental in situ scheme Lindbergh area)
Date
1984
Title
Examiners report on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1984 (experimental in situ scheme Lindbergh area)
Date
1984
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Application Number
831102
Hearing Panel
Warne GA
Moloney JK
Remmer WG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Carbon dioxide injection
Cyclic steam injection
Elk Point area
In situ
Lindbergh area
Steam injection
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Air quality
Communication
Emission
Environmental impact
Hydrogen sulphide
Noise (sound)
NTS 73E
Pilot scale
Pollution
Sulphur dioxide
Water well
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E84-26 on application No. 831102 for approval of an experimental scheme to cyclicly stimulate 10 existing wells in section 3, TP.56, R.6 W4M using steam and carbon dioxide to evaluate the technical and economic feasibility of this recovery method in the Cold Lake Wabiskaw McMurray oil sands deposit.
Interveners
Shymkiw, J.
Shymkiw, Mrs.J.
Shymkiw, H.
Shymkiw, Mrs.H.
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Less detail

Decision 84-26

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1699
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
840498
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1984 (Peace River expansion project)
Date
1984
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1984 (Peace River expansion project)
Date
1984
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
840498
Hearing Panel
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cyclic steam injection
In situ
Peace River area
Peace River in situ project
Produced water
Steam flooding
Steam injection
Oil sands project
Oil sands oil recovery
Thermal recovery
Bluesky Fm
Bullhead Gp
Contamination
Environmental impact
Expansion
Groundwater
NTS 84C
Oil producing
Pollution control
Recycling
Socio-economic effect
Water disposal
Water producing
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
Decision D84-26 on application No. 840498 for approval of a commercial scheme involving the expansion OS Shell's current Peace River in situ project under Board approval 2485 (TP.85, R.18, W5M) to recover bitumen from the Peace River Bluesky Bullhead oil sands deposit (Peace River expansion project); Board hearing 1984-09-11/12
Interveners
BP Resources Canada Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Lesser Slave Lake Indian Regional Council
Whitefish Lake Indian Band
Duncan's Band
Lubicon Lake Band
Native Members of the Cree Community of Little Buffalo Lake
Mackenzie Regional Planning Commission
Less detail

Decision 85-06

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1686
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
840739
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Experimental in situ scheme Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Experimental in situ scheme Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
840739
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cyclic steam injection
Elk Point area
In situ
Lindbergh area
Steam injection
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Air quality
Community relations
Cummings Fm
Emission
Environmental impact
Land value
Monitoring
Noise (sound)
NTS 73E
Pilot scale
Pollution
Safety
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
Decision D85-6 on application No. 840739 for approval to develop a 16 well cyclic steam experimental project in the Cummings zone of the Cold Lake Wabiskaw-McMurray oil sands deposit (section 10-56-6 W4M); resulted in approval No. 4448
Interveners
Yaremkevich, D.
Kadutski, D.
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Group of Elk Point-Lindbergh Area Residents
Town of Elk Point
County of Vermillion River
County of St.Paul
Less detail

Decision 85-07

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1685
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Application Number
840736
840986
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1985 (reduced well spacing and cleaning plant Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1985 (reduced well spacing and cleaning plant Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Application Number
840736
840986
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Spacing
Descriptors
Drilling spacing unit
In situ
Industrial plant
Lindbergh area
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Bitumen
Cleaning
Community relations
Contamination
Cummings Fm
Directional well
Environmental impact
Groundwater
Monitoring
Noise (sound)
NTS 73E
Oil pipeline
Solid hydrocarbon
Transportation
Truck
Water disposal
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.002
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.030
Notes
Decision D85-7 on application No. 840736 and No. 840986 to reduce well spacing for primary recovery from Cummings zone-Cold Lake-Wabiskaw-McMurray oil sands deposit and to construct and operate a cleaning plant to handle hydrocarbon production trucked from various PanCanadian wells (in section 3-56-6 W4M); Board hearing 84-12-11/12; resulted in Order No. Misc 8501
Interveners
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Shymkiw, J.
Shymkiw, Mrs.J.
Shymkiw, H.
Shymikiw, Mrs.H.
Kozicky, C.
Kozicky, Mrs.C.
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Group of Elk Point-Lindbergh Area Residents
Town of Elk Point
County of St. Paul
Less detail

Decision 85-15

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1680
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
840227
Title
Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1985 (commercial oil sands project (phase 1) Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1985 (commercial oil sands project (phase 1) Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
840227
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Carbon dioxide injection
Cyclic steam injection
Elk Point area
Elk Point project
In situ
Industrial plant
Lindbergh field
Steam flooding
Steam injection
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Air quality
Bitumen
Cleaning
Contamination
Disposal well
Emission
Environmental impact
ID-80-02
Hydrogen sulphide
Land reclamation
Land use
Locating
Monitoring
NTS 73E
Noise (sound)
Pollution
Recovery factor
Recycling
Socio-economic effect
Waste disposal
Water disposal
Water supply
Water well
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
Decision D85-15 (with addendum) on application No. 840227 for approval of phase 1 of a three phase commercial oil sands project (Elk Point project) in Lindbergh sector of Cold Lake oil sands deposits, consisting of 13-well cyclic steam and steam flood stimulation project on 2 Hectare well spacing and a 640 CU. M./day bitumen cleaning plant (TP.54-46, R.5-7 W4M); Board hearing 1985-01-08/09/12/15-18/21-23
Interveners
Kadutski, D.
Kadutski, C.
Kadutski, M.
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Keith, L.
Group of Elk Point -Lindbergh Area Residents
Town of Elk Point
County of St. Paul
Westmin Resources Limited
Less detail

Decision 85-20

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision828
Applicant
Koch Exploration Canada Ltd.
Application Number
841220
Title
Examiner report on application by Koch Exploration Canada Ltd., 1985 (experimental oil sands project Beaverdam sector)
Date
1985
Title
Examiner report on application by Koch Exploration Canada Ltd., 1985 (experimental oil sands project Beaverdam sector)
Date
1985
Applicant
Koch Exploration Canada Ltd.
Application Number
841220
Hearing Panel
Homeniuk TF
Lillo HO
Nichol JR
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cyclic steam injection
In situ
Steam injection
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Community relations
Disposal well
Emission
Environmental impact
Grand Rapids Fm
Injection well
Locating
Noise (sound)
NTS 73L
Pilot scale
Safety
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E85-20 on application No. 841220 to expand existing experimental cyclic steam project in the west half of section 19-61-4 W4M for recovery of bitumen from Cold Lake upper Grand Rapids oil sands deposit.
Interveners
Beaunoyer, L.
Beaunoyer, D.
Bonny Glen Farms, Limited
Campeau, L.
Suncor Inc.
Less detail

Decision 85-36

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision983
Applicant
Murphy Oil Company Limited.
Application Number
841338
Title
Decision on application by Murphy Oil Company Limited, 1985 (commercial oil sands project phase 1, Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Murphy Oil Company Limited, 1985 (commercial oil sands project phase 1, Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Applicant
Murphy Oil Company Limited.
Application Number
841338
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bellows LA
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cyclic steam injection
Elk Point area
In situ
Lindbergh area
Lindbergh thermal recovery project
Steam injection
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Agricultural land
Air quality
Community relations
Directional well
Drilling fluid
Drilling Waste disposal
Electric power distribution
Environmental impact
Land reclamation
NTS 73L
Recovery factor
Right of way
Transmission corridor
Waste disposal
Water supply
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
Decision D85-36 on application No. 841338 for approval in principle of the Lindbergh thermal recovery project (being an expansion of an experimental scheme operating in section 13-58-5 W4M) and to construct and operate phase 1 to recover crude bitumen from the Cold Lake oil sands deposits using a cyclic steam stimulation recovery technique; Board hearing 1985-06-18 and 1985-07-03/04/05
Interveners
Opanavicius, A.
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Elizabeth Metis Settlement Association No.9 and Federation of Metis Settlements
Town of Elk Point
Dome Petroleum Limited
Alberta Municipal Affairs
Less detail

Decision 85-42

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision968
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
850428
850798
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Commercial oil sands project and water disposal scheme Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Commercial oil sands project and water disposal scheme Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
850428
850798
Hearing Panel
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Homeniuk TF
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cyclic steam injection
Dome Lindbergh project
In situ
Lindbergh area
Produced water
Steam injection
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Water disposal
Agricultural land
Air quality
Cummings Fm
Directional well
Disposal well
Emission
Environmental impact
Groundwater
Land reclamation
Locating
Monitoring
NTS 73E
Noise (sound)
Planning
Pollution
Recycling
Waste disposal
Water producing
Water supply
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
Decision D85-42 on application No. 850428 and 850798 by Dome on behalf of itself & its partners Sulpetro and CNG producing Company for a commercial oil sands deposit in TP.53-56, R.4-6, W4M and water disposal scheme, Lindbergh sector (being an expansion of current experimental project to commercial scale); Board hearing 1984-11-04/05/06
Interveners
Miller, L.
Kozicky, C.
Melnyk, A.
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Town of Elk Point
Westmin Resources Limited
Less detail

Decision 85-45

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision904
Applicant
Suncor Inc.
Application Number
850952
Title
Decision on application by Suncor Inc., 1985 (commercial oil sands project Primrose sector)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Suncor Inc., 1985 (commercial oil sands project Primrose sector)
Date
1985
Applicant
Suncor Inc.
Application Number
850952
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bellows LA
Fox EG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cyclic steam injection
In situ
Steam injection
Suncor Primrose-Clearwater project
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Clearwater Fm
Directional well
NTS 73L
Recovery
Water supply
Water use
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
Decision D85-45 on application No. 850952 by Suncor on behalf of itself, Alberta energy Co., Canadian Hunter and Pangaea, for a commercial oil sands project to recover crude bitumen resources from the Cold Lake Clearwater oil sands deposit using a cyclic steam stimulation recovery (TP 67-68, R 2-3, W4M).
Interveners
The Town of Cold Lake
Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
Cold Lake First Nations
Less detail

Decision 86-10|86-10 Addendum

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision625
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Application Number
860168
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1986 (commercial oil sands project Lindbergh and Frog Lake sectors) (and addendum)
Date
1986
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1986 (commercial oil sands project Lindbergh and Frog Lake sectors) (and addendum)
Date
1986
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Application Number
860168
Hearing Type
Board
No Hearing
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cyclic steam injection
Elk Point area
In situ
Lindbergh area
Lindbergh Frog Lake project
Steam injection
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Air quality
Cummings Fm
Environmental impact
Noise (sound)
North Saskatchewan River
NTS 73E
Pollution control
Recycling
Socio-economic effect
Water disposal
Water supply
Water use
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
Decision D86-10 (with addendum) on application No. 860168 to construct and operate phase 1 of a proposed 3-phase commercial project to recover bitumen from Cummings FM of Cold Lake oil sands deposit in Lindbergh & Frog Lake sectors (TP.55-56, R.5-6, W4M) by cyclic steam injection and to include existing experimental scheme in commercial project; resulted in Order No. Misc 8501A and approval No. 5047; no hearing
Less detail

Decision 2004-89

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3894
Applicant
BlackRock Ventures Inc.
Application Number
1241564
Title
Decision 2004-89 BlackRock Ventures Inc. Application for a steam-assisted gravity drainage project for the recovery of bitumen, Cold Lake oil sands area
Date
2004
Title
Decision 2004-89 BlackRock Ventures Inc. Application for a steam-assisted gravity drainage project for the recovery of bitumen, Cold Lake oil sands area
Date
2004
Applicant
BlackRock Ventures Inc.
Application Number
1241564
Hearing Panel
McGee TM
Houlihan RN
Lillo HO
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Bitumen
Cold Lake area
Cold Lake heavy oil project
NTS 73L
Orion project
Recovery
Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Interveners
Ethel Lake Landowners
Stone D
Stone I
Harwerth J
Kolhaas B
Ulfsten S
McDonald K
Nylaund E
Niragu JO
Argo J
Alberta Environment
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
The operator shall comply with a minimum project area subsurface setback of 150 m on the west and north boundaries.
The operator shall submit to the Board, for review and approval by June 30, 2005, a plan to reduce the setback distance and ensure maximum resource recovery from the lease boundary area.
The operator shall conduct all operations to the satisfaction of the Board and in a manner that under normal operating conditions will permit the practical maximum reuse of produced water, with the minimum recycle rate being 90 per cent on an annual basis, unless otherwise stipulated by the Board.
The operator shall, a minimum of 12 months prior to the planned commencement of construction for the planned wells and facilities, submit a report for the Board's approval detailing the information obtained from the long-term supply pump test to be performed on the McMurray Formation.
The operator shall provide the Board after 12 months of commercial plant operations with an updated water balance for determination of the ongoing water recycle rate.
The operator shall submit a copy of its approved groundwater monitoring program and annual monitoring reports.
The operator shall monitor water levels in the groundwater monitoring well system in a manner consistent with AENV requirements.
The operator shall monitor SAGD wells for casing integrity.
Location
??-09-064-03W4
??-15-064-03W4
??-16-064-03W4
??-17-064-03W4
Less detail

Decision 2005-42

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3968
Applicant
EnCana Corporation
Application Number
1391160
Title
Decision 2005-042: EnCana Corporation review of the requirement to file thermocouple data established in the decision 2003-023 - Chard area and Leismer field
Date
2005
Title
Decision 2005-042: EnCana Corporation review of the requirement to file thermocouple data established in the decision 2003-023 - Chard area and Leismer field
Date
2005
Applicant
EnCana Corporation
Application Number
1391160
Hearing Panel
Nichol JR
Langlo CA
Houlihan RN
Hearing Type
Board
Descriptors
Chard area
Decision D2003 23
Leismer field
NTS 74M
Thermal recovery
Legal References
EUB Rules of Practice S46
Oil Sands Conservation Regulation S15
Interveners
Chhina HS
Gittins SD
Approval
Denied
Less detail

Decision 2012-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4475
Applicant
MEG Energy Corporation
Application Number
1571384
Title
Decision 2012-001: MEG Energy Corp. application for an amendment to the Christina Lake regional project Athabasca oil sands
Date
2012
Title
Decision 2012-001: MEG Energy Corp. application for an amendment to the Christina Lake regional project Athabasca oil sands
Date
2012
Applicant
MEG Energy Corporation
Application Number
1571384
Hearing Panel
McManus B
Watson TL
Engen TC
Hearing Type
Board
No Hearing
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Athabasca oil sands
NTS 83M
Abandonment
Degradation
Steam assisted gravity drainage
Thermal recovery
Oil sands project
DIR 020
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S13
Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S53
2012 ABERCB 001
Notes
Change to legal citation effective January 2011
Chipewyan Prairie Dene First Nation (CPDFN), Conklin Metis Local #193 (CML), Whitefish Lake First Nation #128 (WLFN), and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNRL) objected to the application.
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
Condition One: Prior to the commencement of steaming operations in an area, MEG Energy Corp. (MEG) shall repair or abandon all wells that could be impacted by thermal operations in a manner that is compatible with the thermal operations. MEG must contact the ERCB to obtain approval for the manner in which to repair or abandon wells not considered to be compatible with the thermal operations.
Condition Two: MEG shall provide a maximum operating pressure (MOP) and caprock integrity study (MOP study), for ERCB review and approval, prior to the commencement of steaming operations in the Phase 3A and 3B areas, respectively.
Location
13-32-076-04W4
09-06-077-04W4
07-07-077-04W4
03-01-077-05W4
01-01-077-05W4
06-05-077-04W4
Less detail

18 records – page 1 of 1.