Narrow Results By
Decision 90-08
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision85
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
- Application Number
- 890971
- 890969
- 891504
- 891505
- 891506
- 891478
- 891479
- 891480
- 891481
- 891482
- 891568
- 891569
- 891570
- 891571
- 900404
- 891483
- 891290
- 900236
- 891047
- 891757
- 891805
- 891804
- 891803
- 891703
- 891802
- Title
- Decision 90-08 : Shell Canada Limited and Husky Oil Operations Ltd.: Application for Caroline Beaverhill Lake gas development
- Date
- 1990
- Title
- Decision 90-08 : Shell Canada Limited and Husky Oil Operations Ltd.: Application for Caroline Beaverhill Lake gas development
- Date
- 1990
- Application Number
- 890971
- 890969
- 891504
- 891505
- 891506
- 891478
- 891479
- 891480
- 891481
- 891482
- 891568
- 891569
- 891570
- 891571
- 900404
- 891483
- 891290
- 900236
- 891047
- 891757
- 891805
- 891804
- 891803
- 891703
- 891802
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Mink FJ
- Bietz BF
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Caroline field
- Caroline gas project
- Energy development
- Gas pipeline
- Gas processing plant
- Pipeline construction permit
- Product pipeline
- Sour gas
- Sulphur recovery plant
- Bearberry field
- Benefit cost analysis
- Carbon dioxide
- Capitalized cost
- Claus process
- Conservation
- Economic analysis
- Emergency procedure
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- ID-81-03
- ID-88-01
- Feasibility
- Forecasting
- Groundwater
- Nitrogen oxide
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 82O
- NTS 83B
- Operating cost
- Petroleum conservation
- Public interest
- Reliability
- Safety
- Socio-economic effect
- Soil conservation
- Soil pollution
- Sulphur dioxide
- Sulphur recovery
- Water disposal
- Water pollution
- Water quality
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S4
- Notes
- Decision D90-8 on proceeding No. 890971 and on applications by Shell, Husky and associated parties for production, processing and transportation facilities for sour gas reserves in the Caroline Beaverhill Lake area (all in TP.31-36, R.3-10 W5M); Board hearing commenced 1990-04-17 and continued to 1990-05-10 with final argument 1990-05-28/29
- Interveners
- Federated Pipe Lines Ltd.
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
- Altana Exploration Company
- ATCOR Ltd.
- Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
- Gulf Canada Resources Limited
- Mobil Oil Canada
- NOVA Corporation of Alberta
- Numac Oil & Gas Ltd.
- Union Pacific Resources Inc.
- CN Rail
- CP Rail
- Alberta Fish and Game Association
- Pollution Sub-Committee of the Public Advisory Committees - Environment Council of Alberta
- Bauman, J.
- Bauman, L.
- Brown, R.
- McCormick, H.
- Brunner, J.
- Brunner, L.
- Heggie, R.
- Burnstick Lake Cottage Owners' Association
- Caroline Advisory Board
- Caroline & District Chamber of Commerce
- Concerned Residents Action Group
- County of Mountain View No. 17
- Diamond J. Industries Ltd.
- Harris, D.
- Harris, M.
- Hermann, J.
- Jans, E.
- Jans, B.
- Kostuch , M.
- Rocky Veterinary Clinic Ltd.
- Macklin, J.
- Macklin, B.
- Mountain View Land Holders Group
- Olds& District Chamber of Commerce
- Preservation of Agriculture and Living Space Society
- Rocky Mountain House & District Chamber of Commerce
- Roth, L.
- Roth, S.
- Saunders, D.
- 447 Area Residents
- Sundre & District Chamber of Commerce
- Town of Innisfail
- Town of Sundre
- Town of Rocky Mountain House
- Village of Caroline
- Wolf, R.E.
Decision 97-05
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2754
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 960230
- Title
- Decision 97-05: Shell Canada Limited : Application for increased throughput, sour gas plant, Caroline Field
- Date
- 1997
- Title
- Decision 97-05: Shell Canada Limited : Application for increased throughput, sour gas plant, Caroline Field
- Date
- 1997
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 960230
- Hearing Panel
- Mink FJ
- Miller GJ
- Dilay JD
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Caroline field
- Caroline gas project
- Gas processing plant
- Sour gas
- Sulphur recovery
- Sulphur recovery plant
- Air quality
- Emergency procedure
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Decision D1990-08
- Gas flaring
- Health
- Monitoring
- NTS 82O
- Odor
- Public opinion
- Safety
- Soil pollution
- Storage facility
- Sulphur dioxide
- Notes
- EUB Decision D97-05 on application no. 960230 by Shell Canada to amend the Caroline gas plant Approval No. 6319 to increase the raw gas inlet by approximately 15% and increase the sulphur inlet by 21%;
- Board hearing 1996-10-01/02/03/04
- Interveners
- Johnston W
- Johnston I
- Coalition of Citizens Impacted by the Caroline Shell Gas Plant
- Coderre L
- Dahlman P
- Kelley E
- Kelley G
- Macklin J
- McLeod L
- McMurtry D
- Oliver T
- Paget L
- Paget S
- Watson R
- Resident Members of the Caroline Industry/Resident Noise Committee
- Brown D
- Gabler R
- Clearwater M.D.
- Jones D
- Feddema A
- Hermann J
- Approval
- Approved
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- Shell is to conduct a thorough review of potential increases in fugutive emissions
- Shell is to notify the Board, on a quarterly basis, of all public complaints
- Shell is to review the location of its monitoring trailers with AEP
- Shell is to work with the Pagets regarding trailer location
Decision 98-13
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2948
- Applicant
- Canadian 88 Energy Corp.
- Application Number
- 1007569
- Title
- Decision 98-13 : Canadian 88 Energy Corp.: Application to expand sour gas processing facility, Garrington Field
- Date
- 1998
- Title
- Decision 98-13 : Canadian 88 Energy Corp.: Application to expand sour gas processing facility, Garrington Field
- Date
- 1998
- Applicant
- Canadian 88 Energy Corp.
- Application Number
- 1007569
- Hearing Panel
- Prince JP
- Dunn GC
- Schnitzler WJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Air quality
- Emergency procedure
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Gas processing plant
- Sour gas
- Sulphur recovery
- Sulphur recovery plant
- Gas flaring
- Groundwater
- Health
- Monitoring
- Odor
- Proliferation
- Public opinion
- Safety
- Soil pollution
- Sulphur dioxide
- NTS 72O
- Legal References
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S29
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Notes
- EUB Decision D98-13 on application no. 1007569 by Canadian 88 to increase the raw gas inlet at an existing facility at Lsd 6-18-32-1 W5M to a capacity of 3 400 000 m3/day with and H2S content of 228 mol/kmol and a sulphur recovery efficiency of 98.4%.
- Board hearing 1996-03-03/04
- Interveners
- Olds Area Residents Coalition
- Latimer B
- Latimer L
- Latimer G
- Latimer J
- Alberta Surface Rights Federation
- Approval
- Approved
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- Not less that 98.4 per cent of sulphur is recovered on a quarterly basis
- Not less than 98.7 per cent of the sulphur is recovered on an annual calendar year basis
- Eliminate flaring of sour vapours from produced water
- Modify amine flash gas contractor to reduce the H2S content to less than 100 ppm
- Sound monitoring survey in accordance with ID 94-4 to be submitted to all interested parties
- Cost/benefit assessment of sound reduction at amine cooler to be submitted to all interested parties
- Location
- 06-18-032-01W5