Narrow Results By
Applicant
- Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Limited 1
- Breaker Energy Limited 1
- Canadian 88 Energy Corp. 1
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency 2
- Cardinal River Coals Ltd. 2
- EnCana Corporation 1
- Energy Resources Conservation Board 2
- Husky Oil Operations Ltd. 1
- Renaissance Energy Ltd. 1
- Shell Canada Limited 2
- Total E&P Canada Limited 1
- TransAlta Utilities Corporation 1
Decision 82-D
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2313
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 810520
- 810092
- Title
- Sour gas processing in Alberta : a review of evidence presented at recent ERCB hearings respecting the impacts and surveillance of sour gas plants
- Date
- 1982
- Title
- Sour gas processing in Alberta : a review of evidence presented at recent ERCB hearings respecting the impacts and surveillance of sour gas plants
- Date
- 1982
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 810520
- 810092
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Air pollution
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Gas processing
- Nitrogen oxide
- Soil pollution
- Sour gas
- Sulphur
- Sulphur dioxide
- Sulphur dioxide removal
- Sulphur recovery
- Water pollution
- Acidification
- Airborne waste
- Alberta
- Deposition
- Exhaust gas
- Health
- Hydrogen sulphide
- Injection
- Livestock
- Monitoring
- Selenium
- Trace element
- Underground
- Waste disposal
- Notes
- ERCB report 82-D arising from hearing to consider application for sour gas processing at Jumping Pound and Quirk Creek gas plants and pipeline to connect Moose and Whiskey sour gas reserves to Quirk Creek plant. for Decisions on these applications see ERCB Decisions 82-3, 82-12 and report 82-E
Decision 84-A
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1850
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Title
- Report on some trace element studies in the Twin Butte area
- Date
- 1984
- Title
- Report on some trace element studies in the Twin Butte area
- Date
- 1984
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Emission
- Flue gas
- Gas processing plant
- Heavy metal
- Soil pollution
- Sour gas
- Trace element
- Pincher Creek area
- Twin Butte area
- Water pollution
- Waterton area
- Chemical analysis
- NTS 82G
- NTS 82H
- Particulate
- Sampling
- Soil analysis
- Soil survey
- Water analysis
- Notes
- 37 P
Decision 90-08
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision85
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
- Application Number
- 890971
- 890969
- 891504
- 891505
- 891506
- 891478
- 891479
- 891480
- 891481
- 891482
- 891568
- 891569
- 891570
- 891571
- 900404
- 891483
- 891290
- 900236
- 891047
- 891757
- 891805
- 891804
- 891803
- 891703
- 891802
- Title
- Decision 90-08 : Shell Canada Limited and Husky Oil Operations Ltd.: Application for Caroline Beaverhill Lake gas development
- Date
- 1990
- Title
- Decision 90-08 : Shell Canada Limited and Husky Oil Operations Ltd.: Application for Caroline Beaverhill Lake gas development
- Date
- 1990
- Application Number
- 890971
- 890969
- 891504
- 891505
- 891506
- 891478
- 891479
- 891480
- 891481
- 891482
- 891568
- 891569
- 891570
- 891571
- 900404
- 891483
- 891290
- 900236
- 891047
- 891757
- 891805
- 891804
- 891803
- 891703
- 891802
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Mink FJ
- Bietz BF
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Caroline field
- Caroline gas project
- Energy development
- Gas pipeline
- Gas processing plant
- Pipeline construction permit
- Product pipeline
- Sour gas
- Sulphur recovery plant
- Bearberry field
- Benefit cost analysis
- Carbon dioxide
- Capitalized cost
- Claus process
- Conservation
- Economic analysis
- Emergency procedure
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- ID-81-03
- ID-88-01
- Feasibility
- Forecasting
- Groundwater
- Nitrogen oxide
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 82O
- NTS 83B
- Operating cost
- Petroleum conservation
- Public interest
- Reliability
- Safety
- Socio-economic effect
- Soil conservation
- Soil pollution
- Sulphur dioxide
- Sulphur recovery
- Water disposal
- Water pollution
- Water quality
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S4
- Notes
- Decision D90-8 on proceeding No. 890971 and on applications by Shell, Husky and associated parties for production, processing and transportation facilities for sour gas reserves in the Caroline Beaverhill Lake area (all in TP.31-36, R.3-10 W5M); Board hearing commenced 1990-04-17 and continued to 1990-05-10 with final argument 1990-05-28/29
- Interveners
- Federated Pipe Lines Ltd.
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
- Altana Exploration Company
- ATCOR Ltd.
- Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
- Gulf Canada Resources Limited
- Mobil Oil Canada
- NOVA Corporation of Alberta
- Numac Oil & Gas Ltd.
- Union Pacific Resources Inc.
- CN Rail
- CP Rail
- Alberta Fish and Game Association
- Pollution Sub-Committee of the Public Advisory Committees - Environment Council of Alberta
- Bauman, J.
- Bauman, L.
- Brown, R.
- McCormick, H.
- Brunner, J.
- Brunner, L.
- Heggie, R.
- Burnstick Lake Cottage Owners' Association
- Caroline Advisory Board
- Caroline & District Chamber of Commerce
- Concerned Residents Action Group
- County of Mountain View No. 17
- Diamond J. Industries Ltd.
- Harris, D.
- Harris, M.
- Hermann, J.
- Jans, E.
- Jans, B.
- Kostuch , M.
- Rocky Veterinary Clinic Ltd.
- Macklin, J.
- Macklin, B.
- Mountain View Land Holders Group
- Olds& District Chamber of Commerce
- Preservation of Agriculture and Living Space Society
- Rocky Mountain House & District Chamber of Commerce
- Roth, L.
- Roth, S.
- Saunders, D.
- 447 Area Residents
- Sundre & District Chamber of Commerce
- Town of Innisfail
- Town of Sundre
- Town of Rocky Mountain House
- Village of Caroline
- Wolf, R.E.
Decision 97-04
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2857
- Applicant
- Renaissance Energy Ltd.
- Application Number
- 960977
- 1004244
- Title
- Examiner report on application by Renaissance Energy Ltd., 1997 (applications for a well licence and a pipeline permit Provost field)
- Date
- 1997
- Title
- Examiner report on application by Renaissance Energy Ltd., 1997 (applications for a well licence and a pipeline permit Provost field)
- Date
- 1997
- Applicant
- Renaissance Energy Ltd.
- Application Number
- 960977
- 1004244
- Hearing Panel
- Dilay GW
- Marsh RA
- Elle R
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Pipelines
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Environmental impact
- IL-96-09
- IL-96-12
- Gas pipeline
- Gas producing
- Lloydminster Fm
- Locating
- NTS 73D
- Pipeline construction permit
- Provost field
- Route selection
- Soil pollution
- Water pollution
- Water quality
- Well licence
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Pipeline Act Part 4
- Notes
- EUB Examiners report E 97-4 on application no. 960977 for a licence to drill a well in Lsd 16 Sec 10 Twp 36 Rge 3 W4M to obtain sweet natural gas production from the Lloydminster Formation and on application no. 1004244 to construct approximately 1.1 km of 114.3 mm outside diameter pipeline to transport sweet natural gas from the proposed well to an existing pipeline located in Lsd 4 Sec 14 Twp 36 Rge 3 W4M;
- Examiners hearing scheduled for 1997-02-19 postponed and convened 1997-03-05 in Provost Alberta
- Interveners
- Mouly B
- Location
- 16-10-036-03W4
- 04-14-036-03W4
Decision 97-05
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2754
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 960230
- Title
- Decision 97-05: Shell Canada Limited : Application for increased throughput, sour gas plant, Caroline Field
- Date
- 1997
- Title
- Decision 97-05: Shell Canada Limited : Application for increased throughput, sour gas plant, Caroline Field
- Date
- 1997
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 960230
- Hearing Panel
- Mink FJ
- Miller GJ
- Dilay JD
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Caroline field
- Caroline gas project
- Gas processing plant
- Sour gas
- Sulphur recovery
- Sulphur recovery plant
- Air quality
- Emergency procedure
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Decision D1990-08
- Gas flaring
- Health
- Monitoring
- NTS 82O
- Odor
- Public opinion
- Safety
- Soil pollution
- Storage facility
- Sulphur dioxide
- Notes
- EUB Decision D97-05 on application no. 960230 by Shell Canada to amend the Caroline gas plant Approval No. 6319 to increase the raw gas inlet by approximately 15% and increase the sulphur inlet by 21%;
- Board hearing 1996-10-01/02/03/04
- Interveners
- Johnston W
- Johnston I
- Coalition of Citizens Impacted by the Caroline Shell Gas Plant
- Coderre L
- Dahlman P
- Kelley E
- Kelley G
- Macklin J
- McLeod L
- McMurtry D
- Oliver T
- Paget L
- Paget S
- Watson R
- Resident Members of the Caroline Industry/Resident Noise Committee
- Brown D
- Gabler R
- Clearwater M.D.
- Jones D
- Feddema A
- Hermann J
- Approval
- Approved
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- Shell is to conduct a thorough review of potential increases in fugutive emissions
- Shell is to notify the Board, on a quarterly basis, of all public complaints
- Shell is to review the location of its monitoring trailers with AEP
- Shell is to work with the Pagets regarding trailer location
Decision 97-08
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2854
- Applicant
- Cardinal River Coals Ltd.
- TransAlta Utilities Corporation
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
- Application Number
- 960313
- 960314
- 960677
- Title
- Decision 97-08: Cardinal River Coals Ltd. and TransAlta Utilities Corporation : Appplication for EUB-CEAA Joint Review Panel - Cheviot Coal Project, Mountain Park Area, Alberta : Report
- Date
- 1997
- Title
- Decision 97-08: Cardinal River Coals Ltd. and TransAlta Utilities Corporation : Appplication for EUB-CEAA Joint Review Panel - Cheviot Coal Project, Mountain Park Area, Alberta : Report
- Date
- 1997
- Applicant
- Cardinal River Coals Ltd.
- TransAlta Utilities Corporation
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
- Application Number
- 960313
- 960314
- 960677
- Hearing Type
- Joint
- Utilities
- Category
- Coal
- Descriptors
- Coal project
- Cheviot coal project
- Air pollution
- Air quality
- Biological effect
- Coal development policy for Alberta (1976)
- Coal mine
- Coal preparation plant
- Environmental impact
- Mountain Park area
- NTS 83C
- Open pit mining
- Physiological effect
- Socio-economic effect
- Soil pollution
- Transmission line
- Water pollution
- Water quality
- Wildlife
- Legal References
- Alberta Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S47
- Alberta Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S51
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S37
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S40
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S41
- Coal Conservation Act S10
- Coal Conservation Act S23
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S29
- EUB Rules of Practice
- Fisheries Act S35
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S12
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
- Notes
- EUB Decision D97-08 (report of the EUB-CEAA Joint Review Panel) on applications no. 960313, 960314, and 960677 by Cardinal River Coals and TransAlta Utilities Corporation for a proposed coal mine and coal processing plant (Cheviot Coal Project) and associated transmission line and substation (all in township 45-46, range 22-24, W5M); Joint Review Panel public hearing 1997-01-13 through 1997-02-20 and re-opened on 1997-04-01 for one day
- Interveners
- King MA
- Inland Cement
- Weldwood Canada
- Hinton and District Chamber of Commerce
- Alberta Chamber of Commerce
- United Mine Workers of America Local 1656
- Town of Hinton
- Van Binsbergen D
- Breitkreuz C
- Alexis First Nation
- Cadomin Environmental Protection Association
- Alpine Club of Canada
- Alberta Native Plant Council
- Mountain Park Environmental Protection and Heritage Association
- Alberta Wilderness Association
- Jasper Environmental Society
- Pembina Institute for Responsible Development
- Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society
- Gadd B
- Alberta Fish and Game Association
- Trout Unlimited
- Rocky Mountain Ecosystem Coalition
- Western Canada Wilderness Committee
- Smallboy Camp
- Dave family
- Clark JD
- Higgins B
- Approval
- Approved
- Conditions
- Section 35-45-24 W5M and SW quarter of Section 36-45-24 W5M (upper Prospect Creek) are excluded from application no. 960313
- Cardinal Rivers Coals (CRC) shall monitor aquatic ecology of Lac Des Roche
- CRC shall justify the need for each end lake pit and rock drain
- CRC shall carry out long term monitoring of groundwater and surface water quality
- CRC shall maintain 1000 m buffer between mine disturbance and the Cardinal Divide Natural Area wherever practical
- CRC shall monitor impacts on wildlife populations
- CRC shall establish permissable noise levels
- CRC shall establish community liaison groups, in particular with the Mountain Park Association, stewards of the Cardinal Divide Natural Area, the Alexis First Nation, and the Smallboy Camp
Decision 98-13
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2948
- Applicant
- Canadian 88 Energy Corp.
- Application Number
- 1007569
- Title
- Decision 98-13 : Canadian 88 Energy Corp.: Application to expand sour gas processing facility, Garrington Field
- Date
- 1998
- Title
- Decision 98-13 : Canadian 88 Energy Corp.: Application to expand sour gas processing facility, Garrington Field
- Date
- 1998
- Applicant
- Canadian 88 Energy Corp.
- Application Number
- 1007569
- Hearing Panel
- Prince JP
- Dunn GC
- Schnitzler WJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Air quality
- Emergency procedure
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Gas processing plant
- Sour gas
- Sulphur recovery
- Sulphur recovery plant
- Gas flaring
- Groundwater
- Health
- Monitoring
- Odor
- Proliferation
- Public opinion
- Safety
- Soil pollution
- Sulphur dioxide
- NTS 72O
- Legal References
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S29
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Notes
- EUB Decision D98-13 on application no. 1007569 by Canadian 88 to increase the raw gas inlet at an existing facility at Lsd 6-18-32-1 W5M to a capacity of 3 400 000 m3/day with and H2S content of 228 mol/kmol and a sulphur recovery efficiency of 98.4%.
- Board hearing 1996-03-03/04
- Interveners
- Olds Area Residents Coalition
- Latimer B
- Latimer L
- Latimer G
- Latimer J
- Alberta Surface Rights Federation
- Approval
- Approved
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- Not less that 98.4 per cent of sulphur is recovered on a quarterly basis
- Not less than 98.7 per cent of the sulphur is recovered on an annual calendar year basis
- Eliminate flaring of sour vapours from produced water
- Modify amine flash gas contractor to reduce the H2S content to less than 100 ppm
- Sound monitoring survey in accordance with ID 94-4 to be submitted to all interested parties
- Cost/benefit assessment of sound reduction at amine cooler to be submitted to all interested parties
- Location
- 06-18-032-01W5
Decision 2000-59
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3281
- Applicant
- Cardinal River Coals Ltd.
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
- Application Number
- 960313
- 960314
- Title
- Decision on application by Cardinal River Coals Ltd., Cheviot Coal Project, 2000 (report of the EUB-CEAA Joint Review Panel - Cheviot Coal Project, Mountain Park Area, Alberta) (EUB Applications No. 960313 and 960314)
- Date
- 2000
- Title
- Decision on application by Cardinal River Coals Ltd., Cheviot Coal Project, 2000 (report of the EUB-CEAA Joint Review Panel - Cheviot Coal Project, Mountain Park Area, Alberta) (EUB Applications No. 960313 and 960314)
- Date
- 2000
- Application Number
- 960313
- 960314
- Hearing Panel
- Bietz BF
- Miller GJ
- Beck T
- Hearing Type
- Joint
- Utilities
- Category
- Coal
- Descriptors
- Air pollution
- Air quality
- Biological effect
- Cheviot Coal Project
- Coal development policy for Alberta (1976)
- Coal mining
- Coal preparation plant
- Ecological research
- Environmental impact
- Evaluation
- Indians of North America
- Mountain Park Area
- NTS 83C
- Open pit mining
- Physiological effect
- Road construction
- Socio-economic effect
- Soil pollution
- Transmission line
- Water pollution
- Water quality
- Wildlife
- Legal References
- Alberta Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S47
- Alberta Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S51
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S37
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S40
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S41
- Coal Conservation Act S10
- Coal Conservation Act S23
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S29
- EUB Rules of Practice
- Fisheries Act S35
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S12
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
- Notes
- Conclusions made in this report are supplemental to those made in the Panels' 1997 report, Decision 97-8 (Appendix 1) and include any new information obtained since the release of that report.
- Interveners
- Hinton and District Chamber of Commerce
- Gouthro B
- Dery M
- Carramusa R
- Mork C
- United Mine Workers of America, Local 1656 (UMWA)
- Campbell R
- Town of Hinton
- Risvold R
- Alberta Environment (AENV)
- Alberta Health and Wellness
- Macdonald W
- Cox D
- Smith K
- Stenhouse G
- Sterling G
- Notan L
- MacKenzie A
- Cadomin Environmental Protection Association (CEPA)
- Way C
- Government of Canada
- Linsey G
- Tupper R
- LeFebvre JG
- LaPalme L
- Fairbairn M
- Fenton W
- Gregoire P
- Holroyd G
- Hooper R
- Weaver J
- Bradford W
- Cardiff S
- Johnson D
- Dobson B
- Purves H
- Hodgins D
- Kirkland D
- Weldwood of Canada Ltd. (Weldwood)
- Udell R
- Stauffer R
- Lougheed H
- Alberta Wilderness Association, Jasper Environmental Society,
- Pembina Institute for Responsible Development, Canadian
- Parks and Wilderness Society, and Ben Gadd (AWA Coalition)
- Pachal D
- Gunsch S
- Gadd B
- Seaton J
- Notnes R
- Kittredge P
- Howery D
- Stellmach H
- Mountain Park Environmental Protection and
- Heritage Association
- Godby EA
- Bracko M
- Alpine Club of Canada/Alberta Native Plant Council (ACC/ANPC)
- Dinwoodie A
- Strang I
- Breitkreuz C
- Griffiths G
- Mountain Cree Camp
- Mountain Cree Camp Syllabics Institute
- Nadeau M
- Parry B
- Fedirchuk G
- Nielson R
- Budinski J
- Trout Unlimited Canada (TUC)
- Brewin K
- Alberta Fish and Game Association (AFGA)
- Alexis First Nation (AFN)
- Chief Francis Alexis
- Potts P
- Canadian Nature Federation (CNF)
- Environmental Resource Centre
- Clark J. D
- Mitchell J
- O’Chiese J
- Western Canada Wilderness Committee (WCWC)
- Phillips L
- Jones G
- Treaty 8 First Nations of Alberta (Treaty 8 FN)
- Rath J
- Handel J
- Panel Consultants:
- Ross W
- Peterson E
- Stephenson HG
- Panel Secretariat:
- Kennedy WY
- MacLachlan LJ
- Henderson DIR
- Seguin N
- Creasey R
- Powell R
- Thompson JP
- Roberts L
- Stoddart A
- Brown C
- Morris D
- Nixon V
- Approval
- Approved
- Conditions
- In addition to the original conditions, CRC shall: monitor selenium levels in the water of new end-pit lakes and assess adverse effects; schedule its rail and road construction after consulting with regional forestry and petroleum companies; conduct surveys for rare plant species on mine property; control mining impact on grizzly bears; protect historic archaeological sites; develop alternative to Mountain Park off-highway staging site; maintain regional environmental management initiatives.
Decision 2008-03
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4266
- Applicant
- EnCana Corporation
- Application Number
- 1514869
- Title
- Decision 2008-003: EnCana Corporation application for a pipeline licence Ghost Pine field
- Date
- 2008
- Title
- Decision 2008-003: EnCana Corporation application for a pipeline licence Ghost Pine field
- Date
- 2008
- Applicant
- EnCana Corporation
- Application Number
- 1514869
- Hearing Panel
- Paulson RL
- Vandenbeld MP
- Ferensowicz PK
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- No Hearing
- Legal References
- Pipeline Act Part 4
- Interveners
- Kester M
- Kester Farms Ltd.
- Approval
- Approved
- Location
- 14-19-031-22W4
- 06-19-031-22W4
Decision 2009-48
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4373
- Applicant
- Breaker Energy Limited
- Application Number
- 1603186
- Title
- Decision 2009-048 : Examiner report respecting Breaker Energy Limited application for a pipeline licence Provost Field
- Date
- 2009
- Title
- Decision 2009-048 : Examiner report respecting Breaker Energy Limited application for a pipeline licence Provost Field
- Date
- 2009
- Applicant
- Breaker Energy Limited
- Application Number
- 1603186
- Hearing Panel
- Pesta TJ
- Smandych A
- King RS
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- No Hearing
- Category
- Pipelines
- Descriptors
- Soil pollution
- Pipeline licence
- Provost Field
- NTS 72M
- Legal References
- Pipeline Act Part 4
- Interveners
- Deleff J
- Approval
- Approved
- Location
- 11-32-034-02W4
Decision 2010-30
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4431
- Applicant
- Total E&P Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 1551460
- Title
- Decision 2010-030: Total E&P Canada Ltd. application to construct and operate and oil sands upgrader in Strathcona County
- Date
- 2010
- Title
- Decision 2010-030: Total E&P Canada Ltd. application to construct and operate and oil sands upgrader in Strathcona County
- Date
- 2010
- Applicant
- Total E&P Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 1551460
- Hearing Panel
- Dilay JD
- McFadyen D
- Watson TL
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Air quality
- Environmental impact assessment
- Water pipeline
- Position (location)
- Emission
- Health
- Emergency response plan
- Safety
- Surface water
- Runoff
- North Saskatchewan River
- Groundwater
- Noise (sound)
- Bitumen
- Manufactured crude oil
- Coke
- Sulphur
- Vegetation
- Soil conservation
- Soil pollution
- Oil sands
- Upgrader
- Strathcona County
- Fort Saskatchewan area
- NTS83H
- Legal References
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S11
- Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S53
- Water Act S37
- Water Act S50
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S26
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S3
- Interveners
- Citizens for Responsible Development
- Vissher H
- Vissher E
- Henryk Farms Ltd.
- Alexander First Nation
- Aux Sable Canada Ltd
- North West Upgrading Inc.
- Shell Canada Energy
- Town of Gibbons
- Town of Redwater
- Town of Bon Accord
- City of Fort Saskatchewan
- City of Edmonton
- Strathcona County
- Sturgeon County
- Alberta Industrial Heartland Association
- Sturgeon Community Hospital Foundation
- Merry R
- Olstad R
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- CONDITIONS
- The Board conditions TOTAL’s approval to require it to achieve 99.5 per cent sulphur recovery on a calendar quarter-year basis within 6 months of commencing start-up activities.
- The Board conditions the approval to require TOTAL to conduct a full-scale emergency response exercise that must be performed during a peak traffic period and include notification and actual or simulated evacuation of affected residents/exercise participants prior to start up of operations.
- The Board conditions the approval to require TOTAL to submit in its site-specific ERP, an assessment of all hazards, including an H2S release, and appropriate responses based on the particular hazard for the Board’s review and approval following completion of detailed engineering and design, and its full-scale emergency response exercise.
- The Board conditions the approval to require TOTAL to submit a revised NIA, prepared in accordance with the requirements of Directive 038, six months prior to starting construction.
- The Board conditions the approval to require TOTAL to redo its baseline sound monitoring surveys, in accordance with the requirements of Directive 038, which will include the simultaneous measurement of the A-weighted and C-weighted sound levels in 1/3 octave band values.
- The Board conditions TOTAL’s approval to require TOTAL to conduct the post-commissioning sound monitoring survey three months after start-up to verify compliance with the requirements of Directive 038.
- The Board conditions the approval to expire on December 31, 2016, unless TOTAL satisfies the Board by no later than October 1, 2016, that construction has commenced or unless the Board stipulates a later date.
- Location
- xx-17-055-21W4
- xx-18-055-21W4
- xx-19-055-21W4
- xx-20-055-21W4
- xx-24-055-22W4
- xx-25-055-22W4
- xx-36-055-22W4
Decision 2013-18
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4516
- Application Number
- 1769924
- Title
- Decision 2013-018 : Proceeding into odours and emissions in the Peace River area : organizational meeting report
- Date
- 2013
- Title
- Decision 2013-018 : Proceeding into odours and emissions in the Peace River area : organizational meeting report
- Date
- 2013
- Application Number
- 1769924
- Hearing Panel
- McManus BT
- Macken C
- Engen T
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Descriptors
- Odor
- Emission
- Peace River area
- Three Creeks area
- Reno area
- Seal Lake area
- Heavy oil project
- Recommendation
- Impact
- Impact assessment
- Health
- Transportation corridor
- Vegetation
- Livestock
- Farm crop
- Safety
- Freedom of information
- Monitoring
- Evaluation
- Vapor
- Noise (sound)
- Environmental impact
- Soil pollution
- Water pollution
- Air pollution
- Gas flaring
- Combustion
- Air quality
- Socio-economic effect
- Legal References
- Responsible Energy Development Act (REDA) D17
- AER Rules of Practice
- 2013 ABAER 018
- Notes
- Change to legal citation effective January 2011
- Approval
- No approval required
Decision 2014-05
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4524
- Application Number
- 1769924
- Title
- Decision 2014-005 : Report of recommendations on odours and emissions in the Peace River area
- Date
- 2014
- Title
- Decision 2014-005 : Report of recommendations on odours and emissions in the Peace River area
- Date
- 2014
- Application Number
- 1769924
- Hearing Panel
- McManus BT
- Macken C
- Engen T
- McManus RC
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Environment/Pollution
- Descriptors
- Odor
- Emission
- Peace River area
- Heavy oil project
- Recommendation
- Impact
- Impact assessment
- Health
- Transportation corridor
- Vegetation
- Livestock
- Farm crop
- Safety
- Freedom of information
- Monitoring
- Evaluation
- Vapor
- Noise (sound)
- Environmental impact
- Soil pollution
- Water pollution
- Air pollution
- Gas flaring
- Combustion
- Air quality
- Socio-economic effect
- Decision 2013-018
- DIR 060
- Three Creeks area
- Reno area
- Seal Lake area
- Legal References
- Responsible Energy Development Act (REDA) D17
- AER Rules of Practice
- 2014 ABAER 005
- Notes
- Change to legal citation effective January 2011
- Approval
- No approval required
Decision E77-(p.137)
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1922
- Applicant
- Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 9693
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Ltd., 1977 (gas processing plant Sturgeon Lake field)
- Date
- 1977
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Ltd., 1977 (gas processing plant Sturgeon Lake field)
- Date
- 1977
- Application Number
- 9693
- Hearing Panel
- Webber HJ
- Brushett ER
- Strom NA
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Gas processing plant
- Sour gas
- Sturgeon Lake field
- Acidification
- Airborne waste
- Dissolved gas
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Flare
- Gas conservation
- Gas flaring
- NTS 83N
- Soil pollution
- Sulphur dioxide
- Sulphur recovery
- Notes
- ERCB Examiners report on application No. 9693 for gas processing plant to process sour gas in LSD 10-29-71-23 W5M in the Sturgeon Lake field; approval No. 2548
- Interveners
- National Farmers Union
- New Fish Creek Community Association
- Beddis, A.J.
- Drozda, J.
- McDonagh, C.
- Roschlaub, J.