14 records – page 1 of 1.

Decision 82-D

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2313
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
810520
810092
Title
Sour gas processing in Alberta : a review of evidence presented at recent ERCB hearings respecting the impacts and surveillance of sour gas plants
Date
1982
Title
Sour gas processing in Alberta : a review of evidence presented at recent ERCB hearings respecting the impacts and surveillance of sour gas plants
Date
1982
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
810520
810092
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Air pollution
Emission
Environmental impact
Gas processing
Nitrogen oxide
Soil pollution
Sour gas
Sulphur
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur dioxide removal
Sulphur recovery
Water pollution
Acidification
Airborne waste
Alberta
Deposition
Exhaust gas
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
Injection
Livestock
Monitoring
Selenium
Trace element
Underground
Waste disposal
Notes
ERCB report 82-D arising from hearing to consider application for sour gas processing at Jumping Pound and Quirk Creek gas plants and pipeline to connect Moose and Whiskey sour gas reserves to Quirk Creek plant. for Decisions on these applications see ERCB Decisions 82-3, 82-12 and report 82-E
Less detail

Decision 84-A

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1850
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Title
Report on some trace element studies in the Twin Butte area
Date
1984

Decision 90-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision85
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
Application Number
890971
890969
891504
891505
891506
891478
891479
891480
891481
891482
891568
891569
891570
891571
900404
891483
891290
900236
891047
891757
891805
891804
891803
891703
891802
Title
Decision 90-08 : Shell Canada Limited and Husky Oil Operations Ltd.: Application for Caroline Beaverhill Lake gas development
Date
1990
Title
Decision 90-08 : Shell Canada Limited and Husky Oil Operations Ltd.: Application for Caroline Beaverhill Lake gas development
Date
1990
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
Application Number
890971
890969
891504
891505
891506
891478
891479
891480
891481
891482
891568
891569
891570
891571
900404
891483
891290
900236
891047
891757
891805
891804
891803
891703
891802
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Mink FJ
Bietz BF
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Caroline field
Caroline gas project
Energy development
Gas pipeline
Gas processing plant
Pipeline construction permit
Product pipeline
Sour gas
Sulphur recovery plant
Bearberry field
Benefit cost analysis
Carbon dioxide
Capitalized cost
Claus process
Conservation
Economic analysis
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
ID-81-03
ID-88-01
Feasibility
Forecasting
Groundwater
Nitrogen oxide
Noise (sound)
NTS 82O
NTS 83B
Operating cost
Petroleum conservation
Public interest
Reliability
Safety
Socio-economic effect
Soil conservation
Soil pollution
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Water disposal
Water pollution
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S4
Notes
Decision D90-8 on proceeding No. 890971 and on applications by Shell, Husky and associated parties for production, processing and transportation facilities for sour gas reserves in the Caroline Beaverhill Lake area (all in TP.31-36, R.3-10 W5M); Board hearing commenced 1990-04-17 and continued to 1990-05-10 with final argument 1990-05-28/29
Interveners
Federated Pipe Lines Ltd.
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Altana Exploration Company
ATCOR Ltd.
Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
Gulf Canada Resources Limited
Mobil Oil Canada
NOVA Corporation of Alberta
Numac Oil & Gas Ltd.
Union Pacific Resources Inc.
CN Rail
CP Rail
Alberta Fish and Game Association
Pollution Sub-Committee of the Public Advisory Committees - Environment Council of Alberta
Bauman, J.
Bauman, L.
Brown, R.
McCormick, H.
Brunner, J.
Brunner, L.
Heggie, R.
Burnstick Lake Cottage Owners' Association
Caroline Advisory Board
Caroline & District Chamber of Commerce
Concerned Residents Action Group
County of Mountain View No. 17
Diamond J. Industries Ltd.
Harris, D.
Harris, M.
Hermann, J.
Jans, E.
Jans, B.
Kostuch , M.
Rocky Veterinary Clinic Ltd.
Macklin, J.
Macklin, B.
Mountain View Land Holders Group
Olds& District Chamber of Commerce
Preservation of Agriculture and Living Space Society
Rocky Mountain House & District Chamber of Commerce
Roth, L.
Roth, S.
Saunders, D.
447 Area Residents
Sundre & District Chamber of Commerce
Town of Innisfail
Town of Sundre
Town of Rocky Mountain House
Village of Caroline
Wolf, R.E.
Less detail

Decision 97-04

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2857
Applicant
Renaissance Energy Ltd.
Application Number
960977
1004244
Title
Examiner report on application by Renaissance Energy Ltd., 1997 (applications for a well licence and a pipeline permit Provost field)
Date
1997
Title
Examiner report on application by Renaissance Energy Ltd., 1997 (applications for a well licence and a pipeline permit Provost field)
Date
1997
Applicant
Renaissance Energy Ltd.
Application Number
960977
1004244
Hearing Panel
Dilay GW
Marsh RA
Elle R
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Pipelines
Well licence
Descriptors
Environmental impact
IL-96-09
IL-96-12
Gas pipeline
Gas producing
Lloydminster Fm
Locating
NTS 73D
Pipeline construction permit
Provost field
Route selection
Soil pollution
Water pollution
Water quality
Well licence
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
EUB Examiners report E 97-4 on application no. 960977 for a licence to drill a well in Lsd 16 Sec 10 Twp 36 Rge 3 W4M to obtain sweet natural gas production from the Lloydminster Formation and on application no. 1004244 to construct approximately 1.1 km of 114.3 mm outside diameter pipeline to transport sweet natural gas from the proposed well to an existing pipeline located in Lsd 4 Sec 14 Twp 36 Rge 3 W4M;
Examiners hearing scheduled for 1997-02-19 postponed and convened 1997-03-05 in Provost Alberta
Interveners
Mouly B
Location
16-10-036-03W4
04-14-036-03W4
Less detail

Decision 97-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2754
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
960230
Title
Decision 97-05: Shell Canada Limited : Application for increased throughput, sour gas plant, Caroline Field
Date
1997
Title
Decision 97-05: Shell Canada Limited : Application for increased throughput, sour gas plant, Caroline Field
Date
1997
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
960230
Hearing Panel
Mink FJ
Miller GJ
Dilay JD
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Caroline field
Caroline gas project
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Sulphur recovery
Sulphur recovery plant
Air quality
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
Decision D1990-08
Gas flaring
Health
Monitoring
NTS 82O
Odor
Public opinion
Safety
Soil pollution
Storage facility
Sulphur dioxide
Notes
EUB Decision D97-05 on application no. 960230 by Shell Canada to amend the Caroline gas plant Approval No. 6319 to increase the raw gas inlet by approximately 15% and increase the sulphur inlet by 21%;
Board hearing 1996-10-01/02/03/04
Interveners
Johnston W
Johnston I
Coalition of Citizens Impacted by the Caroline Shell Gas Plant
Coderre L
Dahlman P
Kelley E
Kelley G
Macklin J
McLeod L
McMurtry D
Oliver T
Paget L
Paget S
Watson R
Resident Members of the Caroline Industry/Resident Noise Committee
Brown D
Gabler R
Clearwater M.D.
Jones D
Feddema A
Hermann J
Approval
Approved
Approved with conditions
Conditions
Shell is to conduct a thorough review of potential increases in fugutive emissions
Shell is to notify the Board, on a quarterly basis, of all public complaints
Shell is to review the location of its monitoring trailers with AEP
Shell is to work with the Pagets regarding trailer location
Less detail

Decision 97-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2854
Applicant
Cardinal River Coals Ltd.
TransAlta Utilities Corporation
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
Application Number
960313
960314
960677
Title
Decision 97-08: Cardinal River Coals Ltd. and TransAlta Utilities Corporation : Appplication for EUB-CEAA Joint Review Panel - Cheviot Coal Project, Mountain Park Area, Alberta : Report
Date
1997
Title
Decision 97-08: Cardinal River Coals Ltd. and TransAlta Utilities Corporation : Appplication for EUB-CEAA Joint Review Panel - Cheviot Coal Project, Mountain Park Area, Alberta : Report
Date
1997
Applicant
Cardinal River Coals Ltd.
TransAlta Utilities Corporation
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
Application Number
960313
960314
960677
Hearing Type
Joint
Utilities
Category
Coal
Descriptors
Coal project
Cheviot coal project
Air pollution
Air quality
Biological effect
Coal development policy for Alberta (1976)
Coal mine
Coal preparation plant
Environmental impact
Mountain Park area
NTS 83C
Open pit mining
Physiological effect
Socio-economic effect
Soil pollution
Transmission line
Water pollution
Water quality
Wildlife
Legal References
Alberta Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S47
Alberta Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S51
Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S37
Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S40
Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S41
Coal Conservation Act S10
Coal Conservation Act S23
Energy Resources Conservation Act S29
EUB Rules of Practice
Fisheries Act S35
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S12
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
Notes
EUB Decision D97-08 (report of the EUB-CEAA Joint Review Panel) on applications no. 960313, 960314, and 960677 by Cardinal River Coals and TransAlta Utilities Corporation for a proposed coal mine and coal processing plant (Cheviot Coal Project) and associated transmission line and substation (all in township 45-46, range 22-24, W5M); Joint Review Panel public hearing 1997-01-13 through 1997-02-20 and re-opened on 1997-04-01 for one day
Interveners
King MA
Inland Cement
Weldwood Canada
Hinton and District Chamber of Commerce
Alberta Chamber of Commerce
United Mine Workers of America Local 1656
Town of Hinton
Van Binsbergen D
Breitkreuz C
Alexis First Nation
Cadomin Environmental Protection Association
Alpine Club of Canada
Alberta Native Plant Council
Mountain Park Environmental Protection and Heritage Association
Alberta Wilderness Association
Jasper Environmental Society
Pembina Institute for Responsible Development
Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society
Gadd B
Alberta Fish and Game Association
Trout Unlimited
Rocky Mountain Ecosystem Coalition
Western Canada Wilderness Committee
Smallboy Camp
Dave family
Clark JD
Higgins B
Approval
Approved
Conditions
Section 35-45-24 W5M and SW quarter of Section 36-45-24 W5M (upper Prospect Creek) are excluded from application no. 960313
Cardinal Rivers Coals (CRC) shall monitor aquatic ecology of Lac Des Roche
CRC shall justify the need for each end lake pit and rock drain
CRC shall carry out long term monitoring of groundwater and surface water quality
CRC shall maintain 1000 m buffer between mine disturbance and the Cardinal Divide Natural Area wherever practical
CRC shall monitor impacts on wildlife populations
CRC shall establish permissable noise levels
CRC shall establish community liaison groups, in particular with the Mountain Park Association, stewards of the Cardinal Divide Natural Area, the Alexis First Nation, and the Smallboy Camp
Less detail

Decision 98-13

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2948
Applicant
Canadian 88 Energy Corp.
Application Number
1007569
Title
Decision 98-13 : Canadian 88 Energy Corp.: Application to expand sour gas processing facility, Garrington Field
Date
1998
Title
Decision 98-13 : Canadian 88 Energy Corp.: Application to expand sour gas processing facility, Garrington Field
Date
1998
Applicant
Canadian 88 Energy Corp.
Application Number
1007569
Hearing Panel
Prince JP
Dunn GC
Schnitzler WJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Air quality
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Sulphur recovery
Sulphur recovery plant
Gas flaring
Groundwater
Health
Monitoring
Odor
Proliferation
Public opinion
Safety
Soil pollution
Sulphur dioxide
NTS 72O
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S29
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
EUB Decision D98-13 on application no. 1007569 by Canadian 88 to increase the raw gas inlet at an existing facility at Lsd 6-18-32-1 W5M to a capacity of 3 400 000 m3/day with and H2S content of 228 mol/kmol and a sulphur recovery efficiency of 98.4%.
Board hearing 1996-03-03/04
Interveners
Olds Area Residents Coalition
Latimer B
Latimer L
Latimer G
Latimer J
Alberta Surface Rights Federation
Approval
Approved
Approved with conditions
Conditions
Not less that 98.4 per cent of sulphur is recovered on a quarterly basis
Not less than 98.7 per cent of the sulphur is recovered on an annual calendar year basis
Eliminate flaring of sour vapours from produced water
Modify amine flash gas contractor to reduce the H2S content to less than 100 ppm
Sound monitoring survey in accordance with ID 94-4 to be submitted to all interested parties
Cost/benefit assessment of sound reduction at amine cooler to be submitted to all interested parties
Location
06-18-032-01W5
Less detail

Decision 2000-59

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3281
Applicant
Cardinal River Coals Ltd.
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
Application Number
960313
960314
Title
Decision on application by Cardinal River Coals Ltd., Cheviot Coal Project, 2000 (report of the EUB-CEAA Joint Review Panel - Cheviot Coal Project, Mountain Park Area, Alberta) (EUB Applications No. 960313 and 960314)
Date
2000
Title
Decision on application by Cardinal River Coals Ltd., Cheviot Coal Project, 2000 (report of the EUB-CEAA Joint Review Panel - Cheviot Coal Project, Mountain Park Area, Alberta) (EUB Applications No. 960313 and 960314)
Date
2000
Applicant
Cardinal River Coals Ltd.
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
Application Number
960313
960314
Hearing Panel
Bietz BF
Miller GJ
Beck T
Hearing Type
Joint
Utilities
Category
Coal
Descriptors
Air pollution
Air quality
Biological effect
Cheviot Coal Project
Coal development policy for Alberta (1976)
Coal mining
Coal preparation plant
Ecological research
Environmental impact
Evaluation
Indians of North America
Mountain Park Area
NTS 83C
Open pit mining
Physiological effect
Road construction
Socio-economic effect
Soil pollution
Transmission line
Water pollution
Water quality
Wildlife
Legal References
Alberta Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S47
Alberta Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S51
Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S37
Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S40
Canadian Environmental Assessment Act S41
Coal Conservation Act S10
Coal Conservation Act S23
Energy Resources Conservation Act S29
EUB Rules of Practice
Fisheries Act S35
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S12
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
Notes
Conclusions made in this report are supplemental to those made in the Panels' 1997 report, Decision 97-8 (Appendix 1) and include any new information obtained since the release of that report.
Interveners
Hinton and District Chamber of Commerce
Gouthro B
Dery M
Carramusa R
Mork C
United Mine Workers of America, Local 1656 (UMWA)
Campbell R
Town of Hinton
Risvold R
Alberta Environment (AENV)
Alberta Health and Wellness
Macdonald W
Cox D
Smith K
Stenhouse G
Sterling G
Notan L
MacKenzie A
Cadomin Environmental Protection Association (CEPA)
Way C
Government of Canada
Linsey G
Tupper R
LeFebvre JG
LaPalme L
Fairbairn M
Fenton W
Gregoire P
Holroyd G
Hooper R
Weaver J
Bradford W
Cardiff S
Johnson D
Dobson B
Purves H
Hodgins D
Kirkland D
Weldwood of Canada Ltd. (Weldwood)
Udell R
Stauffer R
Lougheed H
Alberta Wilderness Association, Jasper Environmental Society,
Pembina Institute for Responsible Development, Canadian
Parks and Wilderness Society, and Ben Gadd (AWA Coalition)
Pachal D
Gunsch S
Gadd B
Seaton J
Notnes R
Kittredge P
Howery D
Stellmach H
Mountain Park Environmental Protection and
Heritage Association
Godby EA
Bracko M
Alpine Club of Canada/Alberta Native Plant Council (ACC/ANPC)
Dinwoodie A
Strang I
Breitkreuz C
Griffiths G
Mountain Cree Camp
Mountain Cree Camp Syllabics Institute
Nadeau M
Parry B
Fedirchuk G
Nielson R
Budinski J
Trout Unlimited Canada (TUC)
Brewin K
Alberta Fish and Game Association (AFGA)
Alexis First Nation (AFN)
Chief Francis Alexis
Potts P
Canadian Nature Federation (CNF)
Environmental Resource Centre
Clark J. D
Mitchell J
O’Chiese J
Western Canada Wilderness Committee (WCWC)
Phillips L
Jones G
Treaty 8 First Nations of Alberta (Treaty 8 FN)
Rath J
Handel J
Panel Consultants:
Ross W
Peterson E
Stephenson HG
Panel Secretariat:
Kennedy WY
MacLachlan LJ
Henderson DIR
Seguin N
Creasey R
Powell R
Thompson JP
Roberts L
Stoddart A
Brown C
Morris D
Nixon V
Approval
Approved
Conditions
In addition to the original conditions, CRC shall: monitor selenium levels in the water of new end-pit lakes and assess adverse effects; schedule its rail and road construction after consulting with regional forestry and petroleum companies; conduct surveys for rare plant species on mine property; control mining impact on grizzly bears; protect historic archaeological sites; develop alternative to Mountain Park off-highway staging site; maintain regional environmental management initiatives.
Less detail

Decision 2008-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4266
Applicant
EnCana Corporation
Application Number
1514869
Title
Decision 2008-003: EnCana Corporation application for a pipeline licence Ghost Pine field
Date
2008
Title
Decision 2008-003: EnCana Corporation application for a pipeline licence Ghost Pine field
Date
2008
Applicant
EnCana Corporation
Application Number
1514869
Hearing Panel
Paulson RL
Vandenbeld MP
Ferensowicz PK
Hearing Type
Examiners
No Hearing
Descriptors
Reclamation
Construction
Soil pollution
Dispute resolution
Ghost Pine field
NTS 82P
Legal References
Pipeline Act Part 4
Interveners
Kester M
Kester Farms Ltd.
Approval
Approved
Location
14-19-031-22W4
06-19-031-22W4
Less detail

Decision 2009-48

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4373
Applicant
Breaker Energy Limited
Application Number
1603186
Title
Decision 2009-048 : Examiner report respecting Breaker Energy Limited application for a pipeline licence Provost Field
Date
2009
Title
Decision 2009-048 : Examiner report respecting Breaker Energy Limited application for a pipeline licence Provost Field
Date
2009
Applicant
Breaker Energy Limited
Application Number
1603186
Hearing Panel
Pesta TJ
Smandych A
King RS
Hearing Type
Examiners
No Hearing
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Soil pollution
Pipeline licence
Provost Field
NTS 72M
Legal References
Pipeline Act Part 4
Interveners
Deleff J
Approval
Approved
Location
11-32-034-02W4
Less detail

Decision 2010-30

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4431
Applicant
Total E&P Canada Limited
Application Number
1551460
Title
Decision 2010-030: Total E&P Canada Ltd. application to construct and operate and oil sands upgrader in Strathcona County
Date
2010
Title
Decision 2010-030: Total E&P Canada Ltd. application to construct and operate and oil sands upgrader in Strathcona County
Date
2010
Applicant
Total E&P Canada Limited
Application Number
1551460
Hearing Panel
Dilay JD
McFadyen D
Watson TL
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Air quality
Environmental impact assessment
Water pipeline
Position (location)
Emission
Health
Emergency response plan
Safety
Surface water
Runoff
North Saskatchewan River
Groundwater
Noise (sound)
Bitumen
Manufactured crude oil
Coke
Sulphur
Vegetation
Soil conservation
Soil pollution
Oil sands
Upgrader
Strathcona County
Fort Saskatchewan area
NTS83H
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S11
Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S53
Water Act S37
Water Act S50
Energy Resources Conservation Act S26
Energy Resources Conservation Act S3
Interveners
Citizens for Responsible Development
Vissher H
Vissher E
Henryk Farms Ltd.
Alexander First Nation
Aux Sable Canada Ltd
North West Upgrading Inc.
Shell Canada Energy
Town of Gibbons
Town of Redwater
Town of Bon Accord
City of Fort Saskatchewan
City of Edmonton
Strathcona County
Sturgeon County
Alberta Industrial Heartland Association
Sturgeon Community Hospital Foundation
Merry R
Olstad R
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
CONDITIONS
The Board conditions TOTAL’s approval to require it to achieve 99.5 per cent sulphur recovery on a calendar quarter-year basis within 6 months of commencing start-up activities.
The Board conditions the approval to require TOTAL to conduct a full-scale emergency response exercise that must be performed during a peak traffic period and include notification and actual or simulated evacuation of affected residents/exercise participants prior to start up of operations.
The Board conditions the approval to require TOTAL to submit in its site-specific ERP, an assessment of all hazards, including an H2S release, and appropriate responses based on the particular hazard for the Board’s review and approval following completion of detailed engineering and design, and its full-scale emergency response exercise.
The Board conditions the approval to require TOTAL to submit a revised NIA, prepared in accordance with the requirements of Directive 038, six months prior to starting construction.
The Board conditions the approval to require TOTAL to redo its baseline sound monitoring surveys, in accordance with the requirements of Directive 038, which will include the simultaneous measurement of the A-weighted and C-weighted sound levels in 1/3 octave band values.
The Board conditions TOTAL’s approval to require TOTAL to conduct the post-commissioning sound monitoring survey three months after start-up to verify compliance with the requirements of Directive 038.
The Board conditions the approval to expire on December 31, 2016, unless TOTAL satisfies the Board by no later than October 1, 2016, that construction has commenced or unless the Board stipulates a later date.
Location
xx-17-055-21W4
xx-18-055-21W4
xx-19-055-21W4
xx-20-055-21W4
xx-24-055-22W4
xx-25-055-22W4
xx-36-055-22W4
Less detail

Decision 2013-18

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4516
Application Number
1769924
Title
Decision 2013-018 : Proceeding into odours and emissions in the Peace River area : organizational meeting report
Date
2013
Title
Decision 2013-018 : Proceeding into odours and emissions in the Peace River area : organizational meeting report
Date
2013
Application Number
1769924
Hearing Panel
McManus BT
Macken C
Engen T
Hearing Type
Board
Descriptors
Odor
Emission
Peace River area
Three Creeks area
Reno area
Seal Lake area
Heavy oil project
Recommendation
Impact
Impact assessment
Health
Transportation corridor
Vegetation
Livestock
Farm crop
Safety
Freedom of information
Monitoring
Evaluation
Vapor
Noise (sound)
Environmental impact
Soil pollution
Water pollution
Air pollution
Gas flaring
Combustion
Air quality
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Responsible Energy Development Act (REDA) D17
AER Rules of Practice
2013 ABAER 018
Notes
Change to legal citation effective January 2011
Approval
No approval required
Less detail

Decision 2014-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4524
Application Number
1769924
Title
Decision 2014-005 : Report of recommendations on odours and emissions in the Peace River area
Date
2014
Title
Decision 2014-005 : Report of recommendations on odours and emissions in the Peace River area
Date
2014
Application Number
1769924
Hearing Panel
McManus BT
Macken C
Engen T
McManus RC
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Environment/Pollution
Descriptors
Odor
Emission
Peace River area
Heavy oil project
Recommendation
Impact
Impact assessment
Health
Transportation corridor
Vegetation
Livestock
Farm crop
Safety
Freedom of information
Monitoring
Evaluation
Vapor
Noise (sound)
Environmental impact
Soil pollution
Water pollution
Air pollution
Gas flaring
Combustion
Air quality
Socio-economic effect
Decision 2013-018
DIR 060
Three Creeks area
Reno area
Seal Lake area
Legal References
Responsible Energy Development Act (REDA) D17
AER Rules of Practice
2014 ABAER 005
Notes
Change to legal citation effective January 2011
Approval
No approval required
Less detail

Decision E77-(p.137)

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1922
Applicant
Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Limited
Application Number
9693
Title
Examiners report on application by Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Ltd., 1977 (gas processing plant Sturgeon Lake field)
Date
1977
Title
Examiners report on application by Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Ltd., 1977 (gas processing plant Sturgeon Lake field)
Date
1977
Applicant
Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Limited
Application Number
9693
Hearing Panel
Webber HJ
Brushett ER
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Sturgeon Lake field
Acidification
Airborne waste
Dissolved gas
Emission
Environmental impact
Flare
Gas conservation
Gas flaring
NTS 83N
Soil pollution
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Notes
ERCB Examiners report on application No. 9693 for gas processing plant to process sour gas in LSD 10-29-71-23 W5M in the Sturgeon Lake field; approval No. 2548
Interveners
National Farmers Union
New Fish Creek Community Association
Beddis, A.J.
Drozda, J.
McDonagh, C.
Roschlaub, J.
Less detail

14 records – page 1 of 1.