211 records – page 1 of 11.

Decision 73-17

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2194
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
7020
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1973 (transmission line - Imperial Oil Enterprises Ltd. refinery, east Edmonton)
Date
1973
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1973 (transmission line - Imperial Oil Enterprises Ltd. refinery, east Edmonton)
Date
1973
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
7020
Hearing Panel
N/A
Hearing Type
N/A
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Transmission line
Electric Power
Environment protection
Oil refinery
Safety
Notes
Decision 73-17 on application No. 7020 to construct and operate two 138 KV transmission lines from Calgary Power's east Edmonton substation CP 38S to oil refinery owned by Imperial Oil Enterprises and for 138/13.8 KV substation at the refinery; permit and licence No. CP 73-21, No. CP 73-27, and No. CP 73-28
Interveners
City of Edmonton
Less detail

Decision 74-10

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2180
Applicant
Imperial Oil Limited
Application Number
7887
Title
Decision on application by Imperial Oil Limited, 1974 (transmission of sour natural gas in 6-inch pipeline from the Jumping Pound west field to the Quirk Creek Gas Plant)
Date
1974
Title
Decision on application by Imperial Oil Limited, 1974 (transmission of sour natural gas in 6-inch pipeline from the Jumping Pound west field to the Quirk Creek Gas Plant)
Date
1974
Applicant
Imperial Oil Limited
Application Number
7887
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
Berkowitz N
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Jumping Pound west field
Sour gas
Environmental impact
Hydrogen sulphide
Safety
Notes
Decision 74-10 on application No. 7887 to construct about 33 mile long 6-inch pipeline for transmission of sour natural gas from well "IOE Jumpw 11-16-25-6 W5" to Quirk Creek gas plant; Board hearing 1974-08-08/09; application dismissed
Interveners
The Sarcee Indian Band
Sarcee Developments Ltd.
Copithorne, K.F.
The Department of Indian Affairs
City of Calgary
Less detail

Decision 76-15

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2149
Applicant
Texasgulf Inc.
Application Number
9183
9184
Title
Decision on application by Texasgulf Inc., 1976 (secondary lines for transmission of fuel gas and sour gas Okotoks area)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Texasgulf Inc., 1976 (secondary lines for transmission of fuel gas and sour gas Okotoks area)
Date
1976
Applicant
Texasgulf Inc.
Application Number
9183
9184
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Bohme VE
Macleod NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Okotoks field
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Hydrogen sulphide
Land use
Land value
NTS 82I
Pipeline accident
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S29
Energy Resources Conservation Act S34
Notes
Decision 76-15 on application No. 9183 to construct a secondary line to transport fuel gas from LSD 10-31-20-28 W4M to LSD 11-20-20-28 W4M and on application No. 9184 for a line to transport sour gas from LSD 11-20-20-28 W4M to the Okotoks gas plant (in LSD 14-36-20-29 W4M).
Interveners
Leduc, A.S.
Long, K.
Municipal District of Foothills
Rio Frio Ranch Ltd.
Sheep Creek Developments Limited
Less detail

Decision 77-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2147
Applicant
General Crude Oil Company Northern
Application Number
9414
9415
9840
Title
Decision on application by General Crude Oil Company Northern, 1977 (gas processing and pipeline construction Teepee Creek-Sexsmith areas)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by General Crude Oil Company Northern, 1977 (gas processing and pipeline construction Teepee Creek-Sexsmith areas)
Date
1977
Applicant
General Crude Oil Company Northern
Application Number
9414
9415
9840
Hearing Panel
Webber HJ
Bellows LA
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Teepee field
Air quality
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Gas flaring
Monitoring
NTS 83M
Socio-economic effect
Safety
Sulphur dioxide
Notes
Decision 77-1 on application No. 9414, No. 9415 and No. 9840 to construct a sour gas plant in section 2-74-4 W6M and to construct secondary lines to transport sour gas from points in LSD 10-21-73-3 W6M and LSD 6-26-73-4 W6M to the plant site and to construct a secondary line to transport sour gas from a point in LSD 10-12-74-6 W6M to the plant site.
Interveners
Peace River Regional Planning
County of Grande Prairie
Smith, D.
Hollingworth, N.
Less detail

Decision 77-04

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2144
Applicant
IPEX Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
9980
Title
Decision on application by IPEX Oil and Gas Ltd., 1977 (licence to drill a well in LS 14-36-26-1 W5M Crossfield and Airdrie areas)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by IPEX Oil and Gas Ltd., 1977 (licence to drill a well in LS 14-36-26-1 W5M Crossfield and Airdrie areas)
Date
1977
Applicant
IPEX Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
9980
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Airdrie area
Sour gas
Well licence
Emergency procedure
Gas producing
Gas well
Hydrogen sulphide
Isopach map
Land use
Locating
NTS 82O
Safety
Turner Valley Fm
Urban development
Notes
Decision 77-4 on application No. 9980 to drill the well, Ipex Czar et al Cross 14-36-26-1 (W5M), to produce gas from Elkton member of the Turner Valley formation; Board hearing 1977-02-23/24
Interveners
Town of Airdrie
Nu-West Development Corporation
Calgary Regional Planning Commission
Cooper, G.S.
Cirrus Land Corporation Ltd.
Location
14-36-026-01W5
Less detail

Decision 77-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2143
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
9608
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (permit to construct a pipeline from red deer to Fort Saskatchewan, part 1)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (permit to construct a pipeline from red deer to Fort Saskatchewan, part 1)
Date
1977
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
9608
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Butane
Ethane
Fort Saskatchewan area
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Pentanes plus
Propane
Red Deer area
NTS 83A
NTS 83H
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 77-5 on application No. 9608 to construct an oil line to transport ethane, propane, butanes and pentanes plus from the age plant under construction near Joffre and from Dome's Edmonton liquid gas plant to storage and eventual delivery to the Cochin pipeline at Fort Saskatchewan; Board hearing 1977-02-09 reconvened 1977-03-08; see also Decision 77-06
Interveners
The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Aristocrat Holdings Ltd.
The Battle River Regional Planning Commission
Dow Chemical of Canda Limited
Hampson, C.G.
Harmin Farms
Mayer, H.
Paley, M.
Heppner, E.
Heppner, L.W.
Heppner, M.M.
Heppner, E.A.
Heppner, M.M.R.
Chimer, W.
Cathton Holdings Ltd.
Fenske, W.A.
Lengert, H.
Lentz, C.
Madison Development Corporation Ltd.
Opaninski, B
Opalinski, T.
Yaskowich, J
Ziobro, S.
Shell Canada Resources Limited
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Kataleen, A.Y.
Less detail

Decision 77-06

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2142
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
9608
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (permit to construct a pipeline from Red Deer To Fort Saskatchewan, part 2)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (permit to construct a pipeline from Red Deer To Fort Saskatchewan, part 2)
Date
1977
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
9608
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Butane
Ethane
Fort Saskatchewan area
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Pentanes plus
Propane
NTS 83H
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 77-6 on application No. 9608 to construct a pipeline to transport ethane, propane, butanes and pentanes PLU Board hearing 1977-02-09 reconvened 1977-03-08 see also Decision 77-5 for part 1
Interveners
The Alberta Gas Ethelene Company Ltd.
Aristocrat Holdings Ltd.
The Battle River Regional Planning Commission
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Hampson, C.G.
Harmin Farms
Mayer, H.
Paley, M.
Heppner, E.
Heppner, L.W.
Heppner, M.M.
Heppner, E.A.
Heppner, M.R.
Chimera, W.
Cathton Holdings Ltd.
Fenske, W.A.
Lengert, H.
Lentz, C.
Madison Development Corporation Ltd.
Opalinski, B.
Opalinski, J.
Yaskowich, J.
Ziobro, S.
Shell Canada Resources Limited
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Kataleen, A.Y.
Less detail

Decision 77-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2140
Applicant
Petrogas Processing Ltd.
Application Number
9483
9484
Title
Decision on application by Petrogas Processing Ltd., 1977 (resumption' of operation of secondary lines for the transmission of sour gas, fuel gas, formation water, lean glycol, rich glycol and tracing water)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Petrogas Processing Ltd., 1977 (resumption' of operation of secondary lines for the transmission of sour gas, fuel gas, formation water, lean glycol, rich glycol and tracing water)
Date
1977
Applicant
Petrogas Processing Ltd.
Application Number
9483
9484
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Sour gas
Emergency procedure
NTS 82P
Pipeline route
Safety
Urban development
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 77-8 on application No. 9483 to resume operation of pipelines (all in TP.24, R.24-29, W4M) to transport sour gas and to transport sweet fuel gas, formation water, lean glycol, rich glycol and tracing water and on application No. 9494 to install dual emergency shutdown valves at 3 locations.
Interveners
Garden Heights community residents
Argyle Holdings Ltd.
Hillcrest Investments Ltd.
Parkland Drywall Ltd.
All Investments Ltd.
Ark Holdings Ltd.
Law Investments Ltd.
Rideau Investments Ltd.
Olympic Construction Co. Ltd.
City of Calgary
Less detail

Decision 77-10

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2138
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
770084
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (construct a pipeline from Cochrane to Red Deer)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (construct a pipeline from Cochrane to Red Deer)
Date
1977
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
770084
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Butane
Ethane
Cochrane area
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Pentanes plus
Propane
Red Deer area
Chemical plant
Environmental impact
NTS 82P
NTS 83A
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Safety
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 77-10 on application No. 770084 to construct an oil line to transport ethane, propane, butane and pentanes plus from a point in the NE quarter of section 16, TP.26, R.4 (W5M) near Cochrane to a point in the NW quarter of section 8, TP.38, R.25 (W4M) near Red Deer as part of the Alberta ethane gathering system to provide a continous supply of ethane to the age plant at Joffre.
Interveners
Alberta Natural Gas Company Ltd.
Beddoes, J.L.
Less detail

Decision 77-14

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2134
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
770189
Title
Decision report 77-14: Inquiry report on uncontrolled flow Shell 35 Waterton 12-9-3-30 W4, Waterton Pincher Creek area
Date
1977
Title
Decision report 77-14: Inquiry report on uncontrolled flow Shell 35 Waterton 12-9-3-30 W4, Waterton Pincher Creek area
Date
1977
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
770189
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Inquiry - Blowout
Descriptors
Blowout (well)
Pincher Creek area
Sour gas
Waterton area
Blowout control
Case history
Emergency procedure
Emission
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 82H
Safety
Inquiry
Notes
ERCB inquiry report 77-14 on proceeding No. 770189 to inquire into the cause and events relating to an uncontrolled flow of sour gas from the well Shell 35 Waterton 12-9-3-30W4 on 28 February and 1 March 1977; Board inquiry 1977-03-16; also bound in 1977 Examiners reports starting on P.79
Interveners
Alberta Disaster Services
Huntley, J.
Tweedie, J.
Newton, G.
Municipal District of Pincher Creek
Oldman River Regional Planning Commission
Can-Tex Drilling and Exploration Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 77-21

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2127
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
770118
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1977 (240 KV transmission line facilities in the Red Deer Calgary area)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1977 (240 KV transmission line facilities in the Red Deer Calgary area)
Date
1977
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
770118
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Calgary area
Red Deer area
Transmission line
Agricultural land
Capacity
Electric power demand
Electric power supply
Health
NTS 82P
NTS 83A
Right of way
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S13
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Notes
Decision 77-21 on application No. 770118 to construct and operate a 240 KV transmission line from the Red Deer substation (CP 63S) to a location 23.4 km north of the Janet substation (CP 74S).
Interveners
A Group of 35 Parties
Sackett, K.
Radau, F.
Latimer, M.E.
Bagrie, D.W.
Osterman, Mrs.
Less detail

Decision 77-G

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2369
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
9435
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1977 (240 KV transmission line between Calgary and Lethbridge)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1977 (240 KV transmission line between Calgary and Lethbridge)
Date
1977
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
9435
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Calgary area
Lethbridge area
Transmission line
Agricultural land
Electric power demand
Environmental impact
Forecasting
Irrigation
NTS 82H
NTS 82I
Reliability
Right of way
Route selection
Safety
Site survey
Southern Alberta
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S13
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Notes
ERCB report 77-G on application No. 9435 for 240 KV transmission line (to be designated CP 924L) from Janet substation (CP 370S); Board hearing 1976-11-18 adjourned and reconvened 1977-01-26/27/28
Less detail

Decision 78-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2118
Applicant
BP Exploration Canada Limited
Application Number
770629
Title
Decision on application by BP Exploration Canada Limited, 1978 (licence to drill a well in the Chestermere Lake area)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by BP Exploration Canada Limited, 1978 (licence to drill a well in the Chestermere Lake area)
Date
1978
Applicant
BP Exploration Canada Limited
Application Number
770629
Hearing Panel
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Manyluk AF
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Chestermere Lake area
Well licence
Blowout preventer
Casing (well)
Contamination
Elkton Fm
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Geologic interpretation
Land value
Locating
NTS 82P
Oil producing
Residential building
Safety
Water pollution
Notes
Decision 78-2 on application No. 770629 for a licence to drill a well in LSD 6-15-24-28 W4M to evaluate and obtain production from the Elkton FM; Board hearing 1977-10-06; adjourned to 1977-11-09
Interveners
The Summer Village of Chestermere Leake
Comport Industries Ltd.
Argyle Management Ltd.
Scott, J.
Scott, C.
Anderson, G.
Location
06-15-024-28W4
Less detail

Decision 78-04

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2116
Applicant
Gulf Oil Canada Limited
Application Number
770991
Title
Decision on inquiry into uncontrolled discharge of sour gas Gulf Oil Canada Limited secondary line licence 7293 in the Alix area, 1978
Date
1978
Title
Decision on inquiry into uncontrolled discharge of sour gas Gulf Oil Canada Limited secondary line licence 7293 in the Alix area, 1978
Date
1978
Applicant
Gulf Oil Canada Limited
Application Number
770991
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Inquiry - Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Pipeline accident
Pipeline leak
Sour gas
Atmospheric diffusion
Death
Emergency procedure
Evacuation
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 83A
Pipeline safety
Safety
Inquiry
Notes
Decision on proceeding No. 770991 on pipeline rupture in LSD 1-23-39-23 W4M on pipeline that transmits sour gas from Clive central battery to Gulf Nevis gas plant resulting in an uncontrolled discharge of sour gas at the break location; Public inquiry
Interveners
Quintana Exploration Co.
Hazen and Babb Drilling Consultants Ltd.
Love's Oilfield Construction
Schmidt Drilling
Less detail

Decision 78-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2112
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
780023
Title
Decision on inquiry into uncontrolled flow from the well Amoco Pacific Brazr 7-10-48-12 W5M in the Lodgepole Drayton Valley area, 1978
Date
1978
Title
Decision on inquiry into uncontrolled flow from the well Amoco Pacific Brazr 7-10-48-12 W5M in the Lodgepole Drayton Valley area, 1978
Date
1978
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
780023
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Kupchanko EE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Inquiry - Blowout
Descriptors
Blowout (well)
Blowout control
Drayton Valley area
Lodgepole blowout
Sour gas
Well killing
Air pollution
Case history
Inquiry
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 83G
Procedure
Safety
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S8.137
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S8.142
Notes
Decision 78-8 on proceeding No. 780023 to investigate an uncontrolled flow of sour gas from a well in LSD 7-10-48-12 W5M during a period from 1977-12-06 to 1978-01-02; Board inquiry 1978-02-22/23
Interveners
Alberta Disaster Services
Pacific Petroleum Ltd.
S&T Drilling (Northern) Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 78-10

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2110
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
780017
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1978 (Construct a pipeline from Waterton to Cochran)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1978 (Construct a pipeline from Waterton to Cochran)
Date
1978
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
780017
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Cochrane area
Ethane
Liquefied petroleum gas
Pipeline construction permit
Product pipeline
Waterton area
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Land reclamation
Land use
NTS 82G
NTS 82J
NTS 82O
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Right of way
Route selection
Safety
Transmission corridor
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 78-10 on application No. 780017 to construct a pipeline to transmit ethane, propane, butane, and pentanes plus from Shell Waterton gas plant in LSD 1-24-4-1 W5M to the Alberta natural gas extraction plant in LSD 10-16-26-4 W5M near Cochrane.
Interveners
The Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Foothills Pipe Lines (Alta.) Limited
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas cjompany Limited
Harvie, D.S.
LePatourel, J.
LePatourel, E.
Meston, G.R.
Harper-Penner Group
Rowland Family
Gardner, H.R.
Less detail

Decision 78-11

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2109
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
770900
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Ltd., 1978 (permit to construct a secondary line for sour natural gas in the Jumping Pound area)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Ltd., 1978 (permit to construct a secondary line for sour natural gas in the Jumping Pound area)
Date
1978
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
770900
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Atmospheric diffusion
Environmental impact
Hydrogen sulphide
Nomograph
NTS 82O
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Right of way
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 78-11 on application No. 770900 to construct a sour gas pipeline from LSD 9-24-26-7 W5M to LSD 4-19-26-6 W5M; Board hearing 1978-02-09; reopened 1978-05-09
Interveners
Lamb, T.
Fish, J.R.
Less detail

Decision 78-15

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2105
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
770422
Title
Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1978 (permit to construct a pipeline in the Crossfield area)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1978 (permit to construct a pipeline in the Crossfield area)
Date
1978
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
770422
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Crossfield East field
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Relocation
Sour gas
Energy development
NTS 82P
Pipeline route
Planning
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 78-15 on application No. 770422 to construct a pipeline to transmit sour natural gas from a point in LSD 2-11-29-1 W5M to LSD 9-14-28-1 W5M to replace an existing pipeline; Board hearing 1977-08-03; adjourned to 1977-12-13; interim Decision issued; hearing reopened 1978-06-19
Interveners
Hooker, H.L.
Keeler, K.F.
The Farmers' Group
Howes, D.
Wittaker, D.
Howes, A.
Risler, W.
Aldred, B.
Rau, A.
Rau, L.
Rau, E.
Rau, J.
The Village of Crossfield
Rooke, J.D.
Maffei Farms Ltd.
O'Ferrell, B.K.
Cameron, W.G.
Thompson, R.W.
McLarty, A.L.
Less detail

Decision 78-AA

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2334
Applicant
Forestburg Collieries Limited
Alberta. Dept. of the Environment
Application Number
9903
Title
Decision on application by Forestburg Collieries Limited, 1978 (permit to develop and a licence to commence mining operations at a mine site near Halkirk)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Forestburg Collieries Limited, 1978 (permit to develop and a licence to commence mining operations at a mine site near Halkirk)
Date
1978
Applicant
Forestburg Collieries Limited
Alberta. Dept. of the Environment
Application Number
9903
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Coal
Descriptors
Coal mine
Coal project
Forestburg South mine project
Surface mining
Benefit cost analysis
Bituminous coal
Coal reserve
Environmental impact
Land reclamation
Mine design
Mine safety
NTS 83A
Overburden ratio
Reclamation
Socio-economic effect
Soil conservation
Water quality
Legal References
Coal Conservation Act S10
Coal Conservation Act S11
Notes
ERCB report 78-AA on application No. 9903 to develop and operate coal mine of the south SIDE of the Battle River (TP.39-40, R.15-16, W4M) to replace coal production from the DIPLOMAT mine site No. 1578 to ensure an ADEQUATE supply for APL'S generating station; Board hearing 1978-01-24/25 permit No. C 78-12 licence No. C 78-13
Less detail

Decision 79-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2094
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Application Number
770666
780578
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., 1979 (permit to construct a pipeline from Joffre to Fort Saskatchewan)
Date
1979
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., 1979 (permit to construct a pipeline from Joffre to Fort Saskatchewan)
Date
1979
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Application Number
770666
780578
Hearing Panel
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Ethylene
Fort Saskatchewan area
Product pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
NTS 83H
Pipeline route
Route selection
Safety
Transportation corridor
Urban development
Notes
Decision 79-2 on application No. 770666 to construct a pipeline to transmit ethylene from Joffre to Fort Saskatchewan (earlier hearing 1978-03-15 resulted in Decision D78-7 and approval by permit No. 14763 of pipeline except that portion in TP.53, R.22-23, W4M) and on application No. 780578 to cancel permit No. 14763 as it relates to pipeline route through TP.52 and for approval of new route through this area which would locate the pipeline adjacent to the eastern boundary of the Sherwood Park west restricted development area (TP.52-53, R.22-23, W4M).
Interveners
Windsor, G.
Kahlke, E.
Reid, T.
Shaw, J.
Sutter, H.
Stannard, S.
Losty, J.
Genstar Development Company Ltd.
Mohawk Oil Company Limited
Less detail

211 records – page 1 of 11.