31 records – page 1 of 2.

Decision 83-06

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2390
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
821207
Title
Decision on public meeting to consider concerns regarding the development of the proposed Saddle Ridge area
Date
1983
Title
Decision on public meeting to consider concerns regarding the development of the proposed Saddle Ridge area
Date
1983
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
821207
Hearing Panel
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Land use
Descriptors
Energy development
Land use
Regional planning
Risk
Saddleridge area
Sour gas
Urban development
Urban planning
Calgary area
Emergency procedure
Encroachment
ID-81-03
Gas pipeline
Gas producing
Gas reserve
Gas well
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 82P
Safety
Notes
Decision No. D83-6 on proceeding No. 821207 to consider concerns relating to development of Saddle Ridge area of NE Calgary; public meeting held 1983-01-25/26 & 1983-03-14/15
Interveners
City of Calgary Planning Department
Carma Developers Ltd.
Kentron Development Corporation Ltd.
Cathton Holdings
Qualico Developments
Oscar Fech Construction Ltd.
Longpre Associates
Manz, A.E.
219575 Alberta Ltd.
Saddle Ridge Community Association
Petrogas Processing Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 83-12

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2331
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
821137
Title
Decision on public inquiry to consider potential conflicts between development of sour gas reserves and residential development in the Okotoks area
Date
1983
Title
Decision on public inquiry to consider potential conflicts between development of sour gas reserves and residential development in the Okotoks area
Date
1983
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
821137
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Bohme VE
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Inquiry
Land use
Descriptors
Conflict
Energy development
Land use
Okotoks area
Regional planning
Risk
Sour gas
Urban development
Urban planning
Encroachment
Gas pipeline
Gas producing
Gas reserve
Gas well
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 82I
NTS 82J
Safety
Notes
Decision No. D83-12 (inquiry report) on proceeding No. 821137 regarding conflicts between the development of sour gas reserves and residential development in the Okotoks area covering TP.18-24, R.27 W4M to R.1 W5M;see also related Decision D83-13 on application No. 820346 (application by Canadian Occidental for sour gas processing plant in the Okotoks area); Board inquiry 1983-03-?
Interveners
Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd.
Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Ltd.
Bow North Surface Rights Association
City of Calgary
Canadian Occidental Petroleums Ltd.
Canadian Petroleum Association
Canadian Superior Oil Ltd.
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Committee for Toxic Pollutant Controls
Goldenview Farms Ltd.
J.M. Huber Corporation
Makale & Kyllo Planning Associates Ltd.
Mitchell Energy Corporation
Ollerenshaw, F.J.
Rocher, N.L.
Less detail

Decision 90-B

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision99
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Concord Scientific Corporation
Title
Field measurement program (Gascon2) (Gascon)
Date
1990
Title
Field measurement program (Gascon2) (Gascon)
Date
1990
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Concord Scientific Corporation
Category
Environment/Pollution
Descriptors
Air pollution
Airborne waste
Atmospheric diffusion
Blowout (well)
Emission
Gas leak
Hazard
Hydrogen sulphide
Meteorological data
Pipeline accident
Plume
Risk
Sour gas
Sulphur dioxide
Comparison
Evaluation
Mathematical model
Model
Monitoring
Sample analysis
Notes
Preliminary draft released 1990-04-06, final report released 1990-10 10 volume plus background release public document non-circulating no photocopies
Less detail

Decision 96-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2574
Applicant
Encal Energy Limited
Application Number
951161
Title
Decision 96-11 : Encal Energy Limited : Application to relicense pipeline to transport sour gas in the Rimbey area
Date
1996
Title
Decision 96-11 : Encal Energy Limited : Application to relicense pipeline to transport sour gas in the Rimbey area
Date
1996
Applicant
Encal Energy Limited
Application Number
951161
Hearing Panel
Prince JP
Dilay JD
Lillo HO
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
CSA Standard (Z662)
ID-81-03
Gas pipeline
NTS 83B
Pipeline relicensing
Rimbey area
Risk
Safety
Sour gas
Legal References
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
EUB Decision D96-1 on application no. 951161 by Encal Energy for approval to change the substance authorized to be carried in an existing pipeline (Crystal pipeline) (from compressor station in Lsd 1-4-47-3 W5M to Gulf Homeglen Rimbey gas plant in Lsd 4-5-44-1 W5M) from sweet natural gas to sour natural gas (containing up to 18 moles of hydrogen sulphide per kilomole of natural gas);
Board hearing 1996-02-07/08
Interveners
Hanneman P
Hanneman N
Wheale T
Location
01-04-047-03W5
04-05-044-01W5
Less detail

Decision 96-01 PART 2

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2747
Applicant
Encal Energy Limited
Application Number
951161
Title
Decision 96-01 Part 2: Encal Energy Limited : Application to relicense pipeline to transport sour gas in the Rimbey area
Date
1997
Title
Decision 96-01 Part 2: Encal Energy Limited : Application to relicense pipeline to transport sour gas in the Rimbey area
Date
1997
Applicant
Encal Energy Limited
Application Number
951161
Hearing Panel
Prince JP
Dilay JD
Lillo HO
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
CSA Standard (Z662)
ID-81-03
Gas pipeline
NTS 83B
Pipeline relicensing
Rimbey area
Risk
Safety
Sour gas
Legal References
Pipeline Act S6
Pipeline Act S23
Notes
EUB Decision D96-1 Part 2 on application no. 951161 by Encal Energy for approval to change the substance authorized to be carried in an existing pipeline (Crystal pipeline) (from compressor station in Lsd 1 Sec 4 Twp 47 Rge 3 W5M to Gulf Homeglen Rimbey gas plant in Lsd 4 Sec 5 Twp 44 Rge1 W5M) from sweet natural gas to sour natural gas (containing up to 18 moles of hydrogen sulphide per kilomole of natural gas); Decision D96-1 had identified a need for additional information
Board hearing 1996-11-26/29
Interveners
Hanneman,P.
Hanneman, N.
Wheale, T.
Dyck, A.
Dyck, L.
Granger, J.
Granger, S.
Hughes,W.
Ollenberger, R.
Ollenberger, C.
Reid, J.
Reid, W.
Schiefen, S.
Whitecotton, D.
Protection of the Holy Virgin Mary
Russian Orthodox Convent
O'Ferrall, B.
Munro, S.
Mosier, G.
Mosier, E
Stevenson, T.
Stevenson, P
Bunting, M.
Ings, L.
Woods, M.
Location
01-04-047-03W5
04-05-044-01W5
Less detail

Decision 97-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2852
Applicant
Crestar Energy Inc.
Application Number
1002908
Title
Examiner report on application by Crestar Energy Inc., 1997 (permits to increase the hydrogen sulphide concentration of an existing pipeline and construct sour natural gas pipelines in the Vulcan area)
Date
1997
Title
Examiner report on application by Crestar Energy Inc., 1997 (permits to increase the hydrogen sulphide concentration of an existing pipeline and construct sour natural gas pipelines in the Vulcan area)
Date
1997
Applicant
Crestar Energy Inc.
Application Number
1002908
Hearing Panel
Schnitzler WJ
Pesta TJ
Creasey JR
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
CSA Standard (Z662)
ID-81-03
Gas pipeline
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 82I
Pipeline relicensing
Public consultation
Vulcan area
Risk
Safety
Sour gas
Legal References
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
EUB Examiner's Report E97-2 on application no. 1002908 by Crestar Energy for approval to increase hydrogen sulphide concentration to 18 moles per kilomole in an existing pipeline (Kircaldy) which transports natural gas to Crestar's Vulcan gas plant at Sec 24 Twp 15 Rge 22, W4M; and an application to construct five sour gas pipelines to a tie-in point at Lsd 16 Sec 16 Twp 16 Rge 24 W4M.
Interveners
Adams P
Stretch D
Roebuck W
Mueller G
Approval
Denied
Location
##-24-015-22W4
16-16-016-24W4
Less detail

Decision 97-16

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2892
Applicant
Canadian 88 Energy Corp.
Application Number
1004834
1010138
Title
Decision 97-16: Canadian 88 Energy Corp.: Application to construct and operate sour natural gas pipelines and well production facility, Burmis area
Date
1997
Title
Decision 97-16: Canadian 88 Energy Corp.: Application to construct and operate sour natural gas pipelines and well production facility, Burmis area
Date
1997
Applicant
Canadian 88 Energy Corp.
Application Number
1004834
1010138
Hearing Panel
Mink FJ
Dilay JD
Shirley EA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Pipeline construction permit
Burmis area
Carbondale pipeline
Corrosion
Environmental impact
Flare
IL-93-09
Gas pipeline
Gas reserve
Heating equipment
Lee Lake area
Locating
Recreational facility
Risk
Safety
Sour gas
Tank
NTS 82G
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
EUB Decision D97-16 on application no. 1004834 by Canadian 88 Energy Corp for a permit to construct a sour gas pipeline at Lsd 16 Sec 7 Twp 7 Rge 2 W5M to connect to the Shell Carbondale system at Junction J at Lsd 1 Sec 7 Twp 6 Rge 2 W5M, and on application 1010138 to construct a production facility for the well at Lsd 16 Sec 7 Twp 7 Rge 2 W5M. Hearing issues include recreational use of Lees Lake, sour gas risk, stability of Carbondale system. Reasons for decision issued later in separate report.
Interveners
Rigel Oil and Gas Ltd.
Diamond Hitch Outfiters
Judd M
Federation of Alberta Naturalists
Posey MH
Lees Lake Objectors
Littlewood BF
Sheppard DH
Sheppard JA
Willis J
Dawson S
Wolff WH
Dowsett I
Morris I
Approval
Denied
Location
16-07-007-02W5
01-07-006-02W5
Less detail

Decision 97-16 Addendum

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2971
Applicant
Canadian 88 Energy Corp.
Application Number
1004834
1010138
Title
Decision on application by Canadian 88 Energy Corp., 1997 (application to construct and operate sour natural gas pipelines and well production facility Burmis area) (addendum dated 21 October 1998)
Date
1997
Title
Decision on application by Canadian 88 Energy Corp., 1997 (application to construct and operate sour natural gas pipelines and well production facility Burmis area) (addendum dated 21 October 1998)
Date
1997
Applicant
Canadian 88 Energy Corp.
Application Number
1004834
1010138
Hearing Panel
Mink FJ
Dilay JD
Shirley EA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Pipeline construction permit
Burmis area
Carbondale pipeline
Corrosion
Environmental impact
Flare
IL-93-09
Gas pipeline
Gas reserve
Heating equipment
Lee Lake area
Locating
NTS 82G
Recreational facility
Risk
Safety
Sour gas
Tank
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
EUB Addendum to Decision D97-16 on application no. 1004834 by Canadian 88 Energy Corp for a permit to construct a sour gas pipeline at Lsd 16 Sec 7 Twp 7 Rge 2 W5M to connect to the Shell Carbondale system at Junction J at Lsd 1 Sec 7 Twp 6 Rge2 W5M, and on application 1010138 to construct a production facility for the well at Lsd 16 Sec 7 Twp 7 Rge 2 W5M. Hearing issues include need for the proposed pipelines, pipeline routing, impacts of the pipelines & ability to mitigate the impacts, and notification and public consultation by the application; Issues include: recreational use of Lees Lake, sour gas risk, stability of Carbondale system;
Board hearing 1997-11-12/13/14;
Approval
Denied
Location
16-07-007-02W5
01-07-006-02W5
Less detail

Decision 97-18

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2895
Applicant
ANG Gathering and Processing Limited
Application Number
1007783
Title
Decision 97-18: ANG Gathering & Processing Ltd. : Application to construct sour natural gas pipelines Edson area
Date
1997
Title
Decision 97-18: ANG Gathering & Processing Ltd. : Application to construct sour natural gas pipelines Edson area
Date
1997
Applicant
ANG Gathering and Processing Limited
Application Number
1007783
Hearing Panel
Prince JP
Miller GJ
Hurst TM
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Pipeline construction permit
Edson area
Emergency procedure
Gas pipeline
Land value
Risk
Route selection
Safety
Sour gas
NTS 83F
NTS 83K
Legal References
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
EUB Decision D97-18 on application no. 1007783 by ANG Gathering & Processing Ltd. for a permit to construct a sour gas (up to 275 mol/kmol) pipeline for a 222 km gas gathering system from Lsd 5, Sec 19 Twp 57 Rge 5 W5M to existing facilities at Lsd 8 Sec 4 Twp 59 Rge 23 W5M, Lsd 5 Sec 25 Twp 51 Rge 22 W5m and Lsd 5 Sec 1 Twp 53 Rge18 W5M
Preliminary approval given to pipeline route except for 35 km section that terminates at Talisman Edson gas processing plant; detailed reasons for decision to be issued at later date
Board hearing 1997-10-21 and 1997-12-09
Interveners
Bev Collin Holdings Ltd.
Smith K
Behrens W
Bugg H
Rautio R
Approval
Denied
Approved with conditions
Conditions
To follow
Location
05-19-057-05W5
08-04-059-23W5
05-25-051-22W5
05-01-053-18W5
Less detail

Decision 97-18 Addendum

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2904
Applicant
ANG Gathering and Processing Limited
Application Number
1007783
Title
Decision 97-18 Addendum: ANG Gathering & Processing Ltd.: Application to construct sour natural gas pipelines, Edson area
Date
1998
Title
Decision 97-18 Addendum: ANG Gathering & Processing Ltd.: Application to construct sour natural gas pipelines, Edson area
Date
1998
Applicant
ANG Gathering and Processing Limited
Application Number
1007783
Hearing Panel
Prince JP
Miller GJ
Hurst TM
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Pipeline construction permit
Edson area
Emergency procedure
Gas pipeline
Land value
Pipeline route
Risk
Route selection
Safety
Sour gas
NTS 83F
NTS 83K
Legal References
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
EUB Decision D97-18 Addendum on application no. 1007783 by ANG Gathering & Processing Ltd. for a permit to construct a sour gas (up to 275 mol/kmol) pipeline for a 222 km gas gathering system from Lsd 5 Sec 19 Twp 57 Rge W6M to existing facilities at Lsd 8 Sec 4 Twp 59 Rge 23 W5M, Lsd 5 Sec 25 Twp 51 Rge 22 W5M and Lsd 5 Sec 1 Twp 53 Rge 18 W5M
Interveners
Smith K
Behrens W
Bugg H
Rautio R
Location
05-19-057-06W6
08-04-059-23W5
05-25-051-22W5
05-01-053-18W5
Less detail

Decision 99-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3046
Applicant
Post Energy Corporation
Application Number
1031434
Title
Decision 99-05: Post Energy Corporation application for a sweet well Armisie Field, 11-30-51-25 W4M
Date
1999
Title
Decision 99-05: Post Energy Corporation application for a sweet well Armisie Field, 11-30-51-25 W4M
Date
1999
Applicant
Post Energy Corporation
Application Number
1031434
Hearing Panel
Mink FJ
McGee TM
Bruni MJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Armisie field
Edmonton area
Environmental impact
Guide 56
Hydrogen sulphide
ID 94-04
ID 97-06
IL 89-04
Land value
NTS 83H
Public consultation
Decision D1983 F
Risk
Sour gas
Well licence
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
EUB Decision D99-05 on application 1031434 by Post Energy for a license for a sweet well in lsd 11 Sec 30 Twp 51 Rge 25 W4M to obtain gas production from the Basal Quartz Fm;
Interveners
Yau, Man-Yee
Location
11-30-051-25W4
Less detail

Decision 99-11

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3051
Applicant
Encal Energy Limited
Application Number
1030532
Title
Decision 99-11: Encal Energy Ltd. application to construct and operate a sour gas pipeline Wilson Creek to Rimbey area
Date
1999
Title
Decision 99-11: Encal Energy Ltd. application to construct and operate a sour gas pipeline Wilson Creek to Rimbey area
Date
1999
Applicant
Encal Energy Limited
Application Number
1030532
Hearing Panel
Bietz BF
Miller GJ
Schnitzler WJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Environmental impact
Gas pipeline
Health
NTS 83B
Rimbey area
Risk
Safety
Sour gas
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S43
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
EUB Decision D99-11 on application no. 1030532 by Encal Energy for a permit to construct 37.5 km pipeline, 219.1 mm in diameter, from Lsd 6 Sec 18 Twp 43 Rge 4 W5M to Lsd 2 Sec 5 Twp 44 Rge 1W5M. The pipeline would transport sour gas containing up to 20 mol/kmol H2S. ERCA Section 43 applications made by the Fred and Cathy Whatmore and Gerald Rhine.
Interveners
Whatmore, F.
Whatmore, C.
Rhine, G.
Turnasky, P.
Turnasky, B.
Edge, B.
Edge, R.L.
Pregoda, D.
Pregoda, P.
Houghton, J.
Houghton, D.
Crell, M.
Crell, G.
Lucas, W.
Lukas, G.
Lucas, S.
Lynch, H.
Lynch, S.
Vetsch, L.
Vetsch, K.
Pearman, M.
Location
06-18-043-04W5
02-05-044-01W5
Less detail

Decision 99-16

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3082
Applicant
Canadian 88 Energy Corp.
Application Number
970473
Title
Decision 99-16: Canadian 88 Energy Corp. application to drill a level 4 critical sour gas well Lochend field
Date
1999
Title
Decision 99-16: Canadian 88 Energy Corp. application to drill a level 4 critical sour gas well Lochend field
Date
1999
Applicant
Canadian 88 Energy Corp.
Application Number
970473
Hearing Panel
Mink FJ
Dilay JD
Miller GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Well licence
Community relations
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Hydrogen sulphide
ID 97-6
Land use
Locating
Safety
Risk
Sour gas
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
Decision on application for a well licence to drill a level 4 critical sour gas well at Lsd 10 Sec 35 Twp 26 Rge 3 W5M with a maximum H2S release rate of 2266 10^3m^3/d
Interveners
Prize Energy Inc.
Hutchinson P
Robertson K
Reilly
Turner R
Turner DJ
Calgary North H2S Action Committee
Lochend Sour Gas Emergency Zone Coalition
City of Calgary
Calgary Regional Health Authority
Municipal District of Rocky View No. 44
MacFarlane DH
Locke C
Locke L
Goodhart R
Fedor L
David D
Gordon S
Hunt R
Pollock-Eddy
Johnson O
Murray W
Kaufman R
Approval
Approved
Approved with conditions
Conditions
Develop document management process, including policies and procedures; assessment of the effectiveness of this program subject to audit by third party
That equipment, procedures, and personnel used by contractors are suitable and up to standard
That casing bowl welding procedure be detailed
That steel mill heat certificates for casing and drill pipe be submitted
That Alberta Recommended Practices pipe specifications be used at minimum
That EUB Calgary South Field receive dailing reports
That EUB Field Surveillance attend pre-spud meetings
That EUB drilling rig inspections take place
That drilling take place between summer months only
That ignition is implemented within one minute of ignition criteria
That all components of the Emergency Response Plan (ERP) be tested
That sensitive individuals be identified within the awareness zone
That the ERP is fully understood and implemented, including drilling updates
That all individuals in the EPZ are notified prior to drilling in the critical zone
That air be monitored for H2S and SO2
That adequate municipal and provinical resources be available in case of emergency
That details of the ERP be updated and current
That the company meet with affected emergency planning organizations to prepare contingency plan
Location
10-36-026-03W5
Less detail

Decision 99-18

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3080
Applicant
Range Petroleum Corporation
Application Number
1019406
Title
Decision 99-18: Range Petroleum Corporation application for a well licence Lsd 4-35-70-24 W5M, Sturgeon lake area
Date
1999
Title
Decision 99-18: Range Petroleum Corporation application for a well licence Lsd 4-35-70-24 W5M, Sturgeon lake area
Date
1999
Applicant
Range Petroleum Corporation
Application Number
1019406
Hearing Panel
Dilay JD
Willard RJ
Bruni MJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Well licence
Directional well
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Hydrogen sulphide
ID 97-6
Leduc Fm
Safety
Oil well
Sour crude
Sturgeon Lake
NTS 83N
Risk
Well site
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
Decision on application for a well licence to drill at Lsd 4 Sec 35 Twp 70 Rge 24 W5M to obtain sour oil production from the Leduc formation with a potential maximum H2S release rate of 0.0412 m3/s
Decision deferred until approved Emergency Response Plan (ERP) is in place
Interveners
Buyer D
Rigler K
Lessoway R
Bourgeois S
Bustin K
Durda B
Approval
Deferred
Approved with conditions
Conditions
Drilling activity is not to occur 1 May to 15 October
No permanent flaring
72 hours notice of planned flaring activities; flare testing not to exceed 10 days
Range must test water wells for quality and quantity prior to spudding
Location
04-35-070-24W5
Less detail

Decision 99-18 Addendum

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3387
Applicant
Range Petroleum Corporation
Application Number
1019406
Title
Decision 99-18 (addendum): Range Petroleum Corporation application for a well licence Lsd 4-35-70-24 W5M, Sturgeon lake area
Date
2001
Title
Decision 99-18 (addendum): Range Petroleum Corporation application for a well licence Lsd 4-35-70-24 W5M, Sturgeon lake area
Date
2001
Applicant
Range Petroleum Corporation
Application Number
1019406
Hearing Panel
Dilay JD
Willard RJ
Bruni MJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Well licence
Directional well
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Hydrogen sulphide
ID 97-6
Leduc Fm
Safety
Oil well
Sour crude
Sturgeon Lake
NTS 83N
Risk
Well site
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
Decision on application for a well licence to drill at Lsd 4 Sec 35 Twp 70 Rge 24 W5M to obtain sour oil production from the Leduc formation with a potential maximum H2S release rate of 0.0412 m3/s
Emergency Response Plan (ERP) approved
Interveners
Cambridge G
Rigler K
Marcy G
Durda R
MacDonald K
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
Range must ensure warning signs are posted
Range must employ rovers
Range must confirm that other government agencies will respond
Range must revisit residents within EPZ to confirm accuracy of information
Location
04-35-070-24W5
Less detail

Decision 99-28

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3137
Applicant
Mobil Oil Canada Ltd.
Mobil Resources Ltd.
Application Number
1037560
Title
Decision 99-28: Mobil Oil Canada Ltd. and Mobil Resources Ltd. application for a well licence to drill a critical sour gas well, Crossfield field
Date
1999
Title
Decision 99-28: Mobil Oil Canada Ltd. and Mobil Resources Ltd. application for a well licence to drill a critical sour gas well, Crossfield field
Date
1999
Applicant
Mobil Oil Canada Ltd.
Mobil Resources Ltd.
Application Number
1037560
Hearing Panel
McGee TM
Bruni MJ
Nichol JR
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Well licence
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Groundwater
Hydrogen sulphide
Horizontal well
ID 97-6
Land use
Locating
Public consultation
Safety
Risk
Sour gas
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S43
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
Decision on application for a well licence to drill a critical sour gas well at Lsd 4 Sec 36 Twp27 Rge28 W4M to obtain gas production from the Crossfiled member
Section 43 objection to well licence no. 221575
Interveners
Dowler G
Sandau S
Gunoff J
Luft SK
Harnack L
Rockyview Wapitit Farms Ltd.
Pagenkopf
Approval
Approved
Location
04-36-027-28W4
Less detail

Decision 2000-20

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3170
Applicant
Dynegy Canada Inc.
Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
1034767
1034762
Title
Decision 2000-20: Dynegy Canada Inc. application for pipeline licence amendments Okotoks field; Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd. application for a sour gas compressor station and pipeline licence Crossfield field
Date
2000
Title
Decision 2000-20: Dynegy Canada Inc. application for pipeline licence amendments Okotoks field; Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd. application for a sour gas compressor station and pipeline licence Crossfield field
Date
2000
Applicant
Dynegy Canada Inc.
Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
1034767
1034762
Hearing Panel
Remmer WG
Dunn GC
Berndtsson NG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Decision D1984-7
Community relations
Emergency procedure
Energy development
Hydrogen sulphide
Pipeline construction permit
Pipeline route
Public consultation
Route selection
Right of way
Risk
Safety
Sour gas
Urban development
Dispute resolution
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
EUB Decision D2000-20 on application no. 1034767 by Dynegy Canada Inc. requesting approval to extend the operating term of its sour gas pipeline (licence no. 21027), originating at Lsd 12 Sec 20 Twp 22 Rge 28 W4M and carrying 374.9 mol/kmol of H2S, referred to as the Dynegy Chestermere pipeline; and its sweet fuel gas pipeline (licence no. 17711) which connects at Lsd 10 Sec 2 Twp 22 Rge 29 W4M.
EUB decision 2000-20 on application no. 1034762 by Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd. to construct and operate a sour gas compressor station at Lsd 10 Sec 21 Twp 23 Rge28 W4M and a 11.3 km pipeline carrying 20 mol/kmol H2S from the compressor station to Dynegy's sour gas pipeline at Lsd 12 Sec 20 Twp 22 Rge 28 W4M
Board requested submission of "Land-use and Resource Development Agreement" by October 1, 2000, and as such extended interim operating approval of Dynegy's pipelines until November 1, 2000
Board hearing 1999-08-18 - 27 and 1999-11-22 - 30
Interveners
Bearspaw Petroleum Ltd.
The Soutzo Family
Soutzo, A.
Giovanetto, R.
Ollerenshaw Ranch Limited
The White Families
van Olm, M.
White, F.
White, G.
Hindson, H.
Calgary-Chestermere Landowners and Residents
Nelson, S.
Ryder, L.
Belzberg, H.
Laycock, L.
Singh, N.
Hodgson, J.
Taylor, T.
Haymour, E.
The Shields Family
Shields, R.
The Southeast-Loop Residents and other local interveners
Oloman, N.
Christensen, M
Hennessey, J.
Sutherland, G.
Pearson, D.
Marshall, G.
Evans, B.
Agar, D.
Taylor, T.J.
Approval
Deferred
Approved with conditions
Conditions
Dynegy to conduct full pipeline internal inspection within three months and present results to the Board by July 1, 2000
Dynegy to update emergency response plan in consultation with affected parties
Dynegy to develop a plan to address urban growth in area
Dynegy to work with Shields (interveners) in regards to subdivision plans
Less detail

Decision 2000-20 Addendum

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3342
Applicant
Dynegy Canada Inc.
Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
1034767
1034762
Title
Decision 2000-20 Addendum : Dynegy Canada Inc. application for pipeline licence amendments Okotoks field; Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd. application for a sour gas compressor station and pipeline licence Crossfield field
Date
2001
Title
Decision 2000-20 Addendum : Dynegy Canada Inc. application for pipeline licence amendments Okotoks field; Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd. application for a sour gas compressor station and pipeline licence Crossfield field
Date
2001
Applicant
Dynegy Canada Inc.
Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
1034767
1034762
Hearing Panel
Remmer WG
Dunn GC
Berndtsson NG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Decision D1984-7
Community relations
Emergency procedure
Energy development
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 82O
Pipeline construction permit
Pipeline route
Public consultation
Route selection
Right of way
Risk
Safety
Sour gas
Urban development
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
EUB Decision D2000-20 addendum on application no. 1034767 by Dynegy Canada Inc. requesting approval to extend the operating term of its sour gas pipeline (licence no. 21027), addendum incorporates land-use and resource development agreement (LRD) with landowners
Interveners
Bearspaw Petroleum Ltd.
The Soutzo Family
Soutzo, A.
Giovanetto, R.
Ollerenshaw Ranch Limited
The White Families
van Olm, M.
White, F.
White, G.
Hindson, H.
Calgary-Chestermere Landowners and Residents
Nelson, S.
Ryder, L.
Belzberg, H.
Laycock, L.
Singh, N.
Hodgson, J.
Taylor, T.
Haymour, E.
The Shields Family
Shields, R.
The Southeast-Loop Residents and other local interveners
Oloman, N.
Christensen, M
Hennessey, J.
Sutherland, G.
Pearson, D.
Marshall, G.
Evans, B.
Agar, D.
Taylor, T.J.
Approval
Approved
Approved with conditions
Conditions
Dynegy must submit amendment to its emergency reponse plan prior ro installation of valves
Less detail

Decision 2000-20 Default Addendum

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4117
Applicant
Dynegy Canada Inc.
Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
1034767
1034762
Title
Decision 2000-20 Default Addendum : Dynegy Canada Inc. application for pipeline licence amendments Okotoks field; Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd. application for a sour gas compressor station and pipeline licence Crossfield field
Date
2000
Title
Decision 2000-20 Default Addendum : Dynegy Canada Inc. application for pipeline licence amendments Okotoks field; Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd. application for a sour gas compressor station and pipeline licence Crossfield field
Date
2000
Applicant
Dynegy Canada Inc.
Pinon Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
1034767
1034762
Hearing Panel
Remmer WG
Dunn GC
Berndtsson NG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Decision D1984-7
Community relations
Emergency procedure
Energy development
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 82O
Pipeline construction permit
Pipeline route
Public consultation
Route selection
Right of way
Risk
Safety
Sour gas
Urban development
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
EUB Decision D2000-20 addendum on application no. 1034767 by Dynegy Canada Inc. requesting approval to extend the operating term of its sour gas pipeline (licence no. 21027), addendum incorporates land-use and resource development agreement (LRD) with landowners
Default addendum released January 31, 2006
Interveners
Bearspaw Petroleum Ltd.
The Soutzo Family
Soutzo, A.
Giovanetto, R.
Ollerenshaw Ranch Limited
The White Families
van Olm, M.
White, F.
White, G.
Hindson, H.
Calgary-Chestermere Landowners and Residents
Nelson, S.
Ryder, L.
Belzberg, H.
Laycock, L.
Singh, N.
Hodgson, J.
Taylor, T.
Haymour, E.
The Shields Family
Shields, R.
The Southeast-Loop Residents and other local interveners
Oloman, N.
Christensen, M
Hennessey, J.
Sutherland, G.
Pearson, D.
Marshall, G.
Evans, B.
Agar, D.
Taylor, T.J.
Approval
Approved
Approved with conditions
Conditions
Dynegy must submit amendment to its emergency reponse plan prior ro installation of valves
Less detail

Decision 2000-33

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3211
Applicant
Canadian 88 Energy Corp.
Application Number
1037740
Title
Decision 2000-33 : Canadian 88 Energy Corp. application for a sour gas well licence Okotoks field
Date
2000
Title
Decision 2000-33 : Canadian 88 Energy Corp. application for a sour gas well licence Okotoks field
Date
2000
Applicant
Canadian 88 Energy Corp.
Application Number
1037740
Hearing Panel
Dilay JD
Lock RG
Langlo CA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Emergency procedure
Gas flaring
Groundwater
Okotoks field
NTS 82I
Risk
Safety
Sour gas
Wabamun Fm
Well licence
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
EUB Decision D2000-33 on application no. 1037740 by Canadian 88 Energy Corp. for a licence to drill a level-2 noncritical sour gas well at Lsd 3 Sec 2 Twp 18 Rge 28 W4M to produce sour gas from Crossfield member (Wabamun formation)
Interveners
Coote R
Hermann L
Ronneberg L
Weber E
Pickering S
Approval
Approved
Location
03-02-018-28W4
Less detail

31 records – page 1 of 2.