67 records – page 1 of 4.

Decision 75-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2177
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
7728
7770
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1975 (240 KV transmission line from Ellerslie to Red Deer)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1975 (240 KV transmission line from Ellerslie to Red Deer)
Date
1975
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
7728
7770
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Strong JI
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Ellerslie area
Red Deer area
Transmission line
Electric power demand
ERCB 74-B
NTS 83A
NTS 83H
Right of way
Route selection
Sundance power plant
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S10
Notes
Decision 75-1 on application No. 7728 and No. 7770 to dismantle part of transmission line CP 12L between Ellerslie and Red Deer and to construct and operate new higher voltage transmission line along the existing right of way.
Interveners
Lachman, Mr. R.
Lachman, Mrs. R.
Stebner, A.
Morrisroe, J.T.
City of Red Deer
Red Deer Regional Planning Commission
Bilsborrow, M.J.
Brown, G.A.
Stretch, D.A.
Edmonton Regional Planning Commission
Bilsborrow, E.B.
Department of Highways and Transport
The City of Edmonton
Less detail

Decision 77-21

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2127
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
770118
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1977 (240 KV transmission line facilities in the Red Deer Calgary area)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1977 (240 KV transmission line facilities in the Red Deer Calgary area)
Date
1977
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
770118
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Calgary area
Red Deer area
Transmission line
Agricultural land
Capacity
Electric power demand
Electric power supply
Health
NTS 82P
NTS 83A
Right of way
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S13
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Notes
Decision 77-21 on application No. 770118 to construct and operate a 240 KV transmission line from the Red Deer substation (CP 63S) to a location 23.4 km north of the Janet substation (CP 74S).
Interveners
A Group of 35 Parties
Sackett, K.
Radau, F.
Latimer, M.E.
Bagrie, D.W.
Osterman, Mrs.
Less detail

Decision 77-G

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2369
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
9435
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1977 (240 KV transmission line between Calgary and Lethbridge)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1977 (240 KV transmission line between Calgary and Lethbridge)
Date
1977
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
9435
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Calgary area
Lethbridge area
Transmission line
Agricultural land
Electric power demand
Environmental impact
Forecasting
Irrigation
NTS 82H
NTS 82I
Reliability
Right of way
Route selection
Safety
Site survey
Southern Alberta
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S13
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Notes
ERCB report 77-G on application No. 9435 for 240 KV transmission line (to be designated CP 924L) from Janet substation (CP 370S); Board hearing 1976-11-18 adjourned and reconvened 1977-01-26/27/28
Less detail

Decision 78-10

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2110
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
780017
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1978 (Construct a pipeline from Waterton to Cochran)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1978 (Construct a pipeline from Waterton to Cochran)
Date
1978
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
780017
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Cochrane area
Ethane
Liquefied petroleum gas
Pipeline construction permit
Product pipeline
Waterton area
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Land reclamation
Land use
NTS 82G
NTS 82J
NTS 82O
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Right of way
Route selection
Safety
Transmission corridor
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 78-10 on application No. 780017 to construct a pipeline to transmit ethane, propane, butane, and pentanes plus from Shell Waterton gas plant in LSD 1-24-4-1 W5M to the Alberta natural gas extraction plant in LSD 10-16-26-4 W5M near Cochrane.
Interveners
The Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Foothills Pipe Lines (Alta.) Limited
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas cjompany Limited
Harvie, D.S.
LePatourel, J.
LePatourel, E.
Meston, G.R.
Harper-Penner Group
Rowland Family
Gardner, H.R.
Less detail

Decision 78-11

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2109
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
770900
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Ltd., 1978 (permit to construct a secondary line for sour natural gas in the Jumping Pound area)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Ltd., 1978 (permit to construct a secondary line for sour natural gas in the Jumping Pound area)
Date
1978
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
770900
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Atmospheric diffusion
Environmental impact
Hydrogen sulphide
Nomograph
NTS 82O
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Right of way
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 78-11 on application No. 770900 to construct a sour gas pipeline from LSD 9-24-26-7 W5M to LSD 4-19-26-6 W5M; Board hearing 1978-02-09; reopened 1978-05-09
Interveners
Lamb, T.
Fish, J.R.
Less detail

Decision 80-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2037
Applicant
Texasgulf Inc.
Application Number
780293
780647
780646
780276
790591
780275
Title
Decision on application by Texasgulf Inc., 1980 (licence to drill a well and permits to construct or resume operation of five pipelines in the Okotoks area)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Texasgulf Inc., 1980 (licence to drill a well and permits to construct or resume operation of five pipelines in the Okotoks area)
Date
1980
Applicant
Texasgulf Inc.
Application Number
780293
780647
780646
780276
790591
780275
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Okotoks area
Okotoks field
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Well licence
Crossfield Fm
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
ID-79-02
Gas well
Land value
NTS 82I
Pipeline route
Right of way
Safety
Notes
Decision 80-1 on application No. 780293 to drill a well in LSD 11-1-22-29 W4M to evaluate & obtain production down to Crossfield FM, No. 780647 for pipeline to transport sour gas, No. 780646 for fuel gas pipeline, No. 780276 for pipeline to transport sour gas, No. 790591 for fuel gas pipeline and No. 780275 to resume operation of pipeline to transport sour gas.
Interveners
Carman, D.K.
Klaver, K.
Klaver, Mrs.
Heschl, B.
Heschl, Mrs.
Uragi, K.
Less detail

Decision 80-10

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2029
Applicant
Town of Sundre
Application Number
800359
Title
Decision on application by Town of Sundre, 1980 (relocation of a pipeline)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Town of Sundre, 1980 (relocation of a pipeline)
Date
1980
Applicant
Town of Sundre
Application Number
800359
Hearing Panel
Goodman CJ
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Pipeline route
Relocation
Sundre area
Cost analysis
Encroachment
NTS 82O
Regional planning
Right of way
Urban development
Legal References
Pipeline Act S34
Notes
Decision 80-10 on application No. 800359 to have Board Order the relocation of a pipeline owned by Alberta Gas Trunk Line located in section 33-32-5 W5M and section 4-33-5 W5M so as not to affect future development of the Town of Sundre under its annexation plan.
Interveners
The Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
EMA Holdings Ltd.
Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd.
Newall, A.P.
Less detail

Decision 80-14|80-14 Addendum

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2025
Applicant
Edmonton Power
Application Number
800049
Title
Decision on application by Edmonton Power, 1980 (240 KV transmission line Jasper terminal-north Calder) (and addendum)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Edmonton Power, 1980 (240 KV transmission line Jasper terminal-north Calder) (and addendum)
Date
1980
Applicant
Edmonton Power
Application Number
800049
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Goodman CJ
Bray JA
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Transmission line
Reliability
Right of way
Route selection
Transmission corridor
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act
Notes
Decision and addendum on application to construct and operate a 240 KV transmission line designated as EP 930L from Edmonton Power's Jasper terminal to Calgary Power's north Calder substation (TP.53, R.25, W4M)
Interveners
Duke, M.
Babie, T.L.
Less detail

Decision 80-30

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2009
Applicant
Alberta Products Pipe Line Limited
Application Number
800440
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Products Pipe Line Ltd., 1980 (permit to construct a pipeline from Edmonton to Calgary)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Products Pipe Line Ltd., 1980 (permit to construct a pipeline from Edmonton to Calgary)
Date
1980
Applicant
Alberta Products Pipe Line Limited
Application Number
800440
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Calgary area
Edmonton area
Petroleum product
Pipeline construction permit
Pipeline project
Product pipeline
Red Deer area
Capacity
Demand (economics)
Environmental impact
NTS 82P
NTS 83A
NTS 83H
Pipeline crossing
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Right of way
Route selection
Supply (economics)
Transmission corridor
Transportation corridor
Notes
Decision 80-30 on application No. 800440 to construct a pipeline to transport gasolines, diesel fuel, aviation fuels, solvents, and heating oil from a pump station in Edmonton to existing facilities in Calgary (TP.23-53, 23-29, W4M); Board hearing 1980-09-23/26; see related Decisions 81-31 and 81-34 for Decisions on specific segments of route that were matters of concern
Interveners
County of Lacombe No. 14
Daines Farms Ltd.
Paul S. Seiferling
Battle River Regional Planning Commission
City of Edmonton
Turbo Resources Ltd.
Crows Nest Resources Ltd.
Daon Corporation
Less detail

Decision 80-D

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2325
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
780709
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1980 500 KV transmission line Langdon - Phillips pass
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1980 500 KV transmission line Langdon - Phillips pass
Date
1980
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
780709
Hearing Type
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Calgary area
Crowsnest Pass
High voltage
Power system interconnection
Transmission line
Agricultural land
Alberta
British Columbia
Environmental impact
Health
Land use
NTS 82G
NTS 82H
NTS 82I
NTS 82J
Right of way
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S13
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
Notes
ERCB report 80-D on application No. 780709 to build and operate a 500 KV substation near Langdon and a transmission line linking the substation with B.C. Hydro at Phillipps Pass (TP.6-23, R.26 W4 to R.5 W5); Board hearing 1979-10-09 through 1979-11-02 (19 days), 1979-11-05/06/07/08/12/ see also ERCB report 82-A for Decision on proceeding No. 810326 to consider alternate points of interconnection with B.C. Hydro
Less detail

Decision 81-07

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2001
Applicant
Algas Engineering Services Limited
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Husky Oil Operations Limited
Application Number
800561
800562
800741
800742
800806
800807
800897
Title
Decision on application by Algas Engineering Services Ltd. and Alberta Energy Company Ltd., 1981 (permits to construct pipelines and related facilities - Lloydminster and Cold Lake, Edmonton and Cold Lake)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Algas Engineering Services Ltd. and Alberta Energy Company Ltd., 1981 (permits to construct pipelines and related facilities - Lloydminster and Cold Lake, Edmonton and Cold Lake)
Date
1981
Applicant
Algas Engineering Services Limited
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Husky Oil Operations Limited
Application Number
800561
800562
800741
800742
800806
800807
800897
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Bitumen
Cold Lake area
Condensate
Edmonton area
Lloydminster area
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Pump station
Cost analysis
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Land reclamation
NTS 73E
NTS 73L
NTS 83H
NTS 83I
Pipeline crossing
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Right of way
Supply (economics)
Notes
Decision on application No. 800561 by Husky for crude oil/bitumen blend pipeline between Cold Lake and Lloydminster refinery and on application No. 800562 by Husky for condensate pipeline from Lloydminster to Cold Lake and on application No. 800741 by AEC to transport condensate from Edmonton to Cold Lake and on application No. 800742 to transport crude bitumen-condensate blend from Cold Lake to Edmonton and on application No. 800807 to construct pumping and measurement facilities at ESSO's Leming plant in LSD 13-5-65-3 W4M and on application No. 800806 by AEC for second pump station in east Edmonton to act as prime mover on condensate pipeline (TP.49-65, R.1-26, W4M); see related decisions 81-19 and 81-29 see also decision D83-14 for decision on an amendment to the route selected
Interveners
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
BP Exploration Canada Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Imperial Oil Limited
Murphy Oil Company Ltd.
Petro-Canada Exploration Inc.
Shell Canada Limited
City of Lloydminister
Edmonton Regional Planning Commission
Community Advisory Comittee of the Cold Lake Region
Lakeland Environmental and Agricultural Protective Society
Cold Lake-Bonnyville Local of the Central Trapper's Association
Mohr, H.J.
Landowners represented by Robertson, Baynton et al.
Schroter Family
Less detail

Decision 81-19

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1989
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
800741
800742
800883
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Shell Canada Limited, 1981 (permits to construct pipelines and related facilities Edmonton-Skaro area)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Shell Canada Limited, 1981 (permits to construct pipelines and related facilities Edmonton-Skaro area)
Date
1981
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
800741
800742
800883
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Bitumen
Butane
Condensate
Edmonton area
Liquefied petroleum gas
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Product pipeline
Propane
Environmental impact
NTS 83H
Pipeline construction
Pipeline route
Right of way
Route selection
Transportation corridor
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 81-19 on application No. 800741, 800742 by AEC to construct pipeline to transport crude bitumen condensate blend from Skaro area to refinery area in Edmonton and an adjacent pipeline to transport condensate in reverse direction and on application No. 800883 by Shell to transport & distribute products from planned refinery near Scotford to Edmonton interprovincial pipeline terminal area (TP.52-57, R.19-23, W4M); see related Decisions 81-7 and 81-29
Interveners
First City Developments Ltd.
Marler, M.
Edmonton Regional Planning Commission
Shirvell, C.S.
Simmons, H.
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Less detail

Decision 81-26

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1740
Applicant
Nova, an Alberta Corporation
Application Number
810421
Title
Examiners report on application by Nova, an Alberta Corporation, 1981 (gas transmission line)
Date
1981
Title
Examiners report on application by Nova, an Alberta Corporation, 1981 (gas transmission line)
Date
1981
Applicant
Nova, an Alberta Corporation
Application Number
810421
Hearing Panel
Homeniuk TF
Pearson DG
Edgecombe RW
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Duhamel area
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Agricultural land
Land reclamation
NTS 83A
Pipeline route
Right of way
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
ERCB Examiners report no.E81-26 on application No. 810421 to construct pipeline from Panther Resources Ltd. gas plant to a tie-in point on the existing Nova Ferintosh lateral to transport processed gas for TCPL from the plant to Nova facilities (TP.45-46, R.20-21 W4M).
Interveners
Tate, R.
Schielke, R.
Schielke, E.
Wilson, J.E.
Wilson, A.G.
Less detail

Decision 81-34

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1974
Applicant
Alberta Products Pipe Line Limited
Application Number
810460
810461
810462
810513
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Products Pipe Line Ltd., 1981 (permit to construct deferred portions of a pipeline - Edmonton to Calgary)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Products Pipe Line Ltd., 1981 (permit to construct deferred portions of a pipeline - Edmonton to Calgary)
Date
1981
Applicant
Alberta Products Pipe Line Limited
Application Number
810460
810461
810462
810513
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Pipeline construction permit
Product pipeline
Red Deer area
Coal deposit
Energy development
Land use
NTS 83A
NTS 83H
Pipeline route
Right of way
Route selection
Transportation corridor
Legal References
Pipeline Act S34
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 81-34 on application No. 810460, 810461, 810462 and 810513 for segments of pipeline approved under permit 189419 (TP.44-46, R.26 W4M TP.47-48, R.25-26, W4M and TP.50-53, R.23-25, W4M) Board hearing 1981-10-21/22/23 see related ERCB Decisions 80-30 and 81-31
Interveners
City of Edmonton
County of Lacombe No. 14
Daon Development Corporation
Landowners - Alternative Route
Schotte, A.
Town of Lacombe
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision 81-D

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2318
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
800736
800777
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1981 500 KV transmission lines Keephills-Ellerslie - east and west sections of the southern route
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1981 500 KV transmission lines Keephills-Ellerslie - east and west sections of the southern route
Date
1981
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
800736
800777
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Keephills power project
Transmission line
Environmental impact
Land use
NTS 83G
Regional planning
Right of way
Route selection
Transmission corridor
Urban development
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Notes
ERCB report 81-D on application No. 800736 and No. 800777 regarding alternative alignments for the east and west portions of southern route of proposed 500 KV transmission lines from Keephills plant to proposed Ellerslie substation (TP.50-52, R.2-4, W5M); Board hearing 1980-12-08 through 17 see also ERCB report 80-A for Decision on original applications
Less detail

Decision 82-07

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2071
Applicant
Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
Application Number
810465
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited, 1982 (permit to construct a pipeline Okotoks to Cayley)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited, 1982 (permit to construct a pipeline Okotoks to Cayley)
Date
1982
Applicant
Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
Application Number
810465
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Morin EJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
High River area
Okotoks area
Pipeline construction permit
Encroachment
Erosion
Hazard
Maintenance
NTS 82I
Pipeline corrosion
Pipeline design
Pipeline leak
Pipeline route
Repair
Right of way
Route selection
Safety
Urban development
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 82-7 on application No. 810465 to construct 35 km of 323.9 MM outside diameter pipeline to replace a portion of CWNG'S main gas line between Calgary & Monarch (TP.17-20, R.28-29, W4M).
Interveners
Town of High River
Wolfe, F.
Jennings, R.F.
Snider Dahow Holdings Ltd.
Robertson, P.
Fuhrman, W.
Fuhrman, H.
Aitken, R.
Goldwind Farms Ltd.
Fossen, B.
Fossen, E.
Clark, R.
Clark, N.
Hock, S.
Hock, J.
Borger, W.
Borger, E.
Coy, J.G.
Coy, B.
Dudgeon, I.
Dudgeon, N.P.
Ellis, B.
Less detail

Decision 82-14

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2064
Applicant
Alberta Power Limited
TransAlta Utilities Corporation
Application Number
810608
810733
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Power Ltd. and Transalta Utilities Corporation, 1982 (240 kv transmission line facilities in the Louise Creek - Sagitawah area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Power Ltd. and Transalta Utilities Corporation, 1982 (240 kv transmission line facilities in the Louise Creek - Sagitawah area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Alberta Power Limited
TransAlta Utilities Corporation
Application Number
810608
810733
Hearing Panel
Goodman CJ
Morin EJ
Brushett ER
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Electric substation
Swan Hills area
Transmission line
Electric power demand
Environmental impact
Land use
NTS 83J
Right of way
Route selection
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S12
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S16
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
Notes
Decision 82-14 on application No. 810608 by Alberta Power to construct & operate a 240-KV double circuit transmission line AP938L/939L to connect with Alberta Power's line at service area boundary and run south to existing Sagitawah substation CP 77S (TP.59-65, R.10-12, W5M).
Interveners
TransAlta Utilities Corporation
Esso Resources Limited
Federated Pipelines
Less detail

Decision 82-22

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2056
Applicant
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Application Number
820083
Title
Decision on application by Northwestern Utilities Limited, 1982 (permit to construct a gas line northeast Edmonton area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Northwestern Utilities Limited, 1982 (permit to construct a gas line northeast Edmonton area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Application Number
820083
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Morin EJ
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Fort Saskatchewan area
Gas pipeline
High pressure
Meter station
Pipeline construction permit
Chemical plant
Environmental impact
Gas demand
NTS 83H
Pipeline route
Right of way
Route selection
Transmission corridor
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 82-22 on application No. 820083 to construct a gas line from LSD 1-4-55-20 W4M to LSD 3-21-53-23 W4M and a meter regulator station to bring high pressure gas from existing NUL facilities to the celanese methanol plant in Fort Saskatchewan area; Board hearing 1982-04-15/16
Interveners
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Celanese Canada Inc.
Johannes Prinz von Thurn und Taxis
R & M Schroter Enterprises Ltd.
Schroter, J.
Schroter, A.
Shell Canada Limited
Shirvell, C.S.
Simmons, H.
Less detail

Decision 82-35

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1117
Applicant
Canada-Cities Service Ltd.
Application Number
820815
Title
Examiners report on application by Canada-Cities Service Ltd., 1982 (approval to construct a flowline in the Drayton Valley area)
Date
1982
Title
Examiners report on application by Canada-Cities Service Ltd., 1982 (approval to construct a flowline in the Drayton Valley area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Canada-Cities Service Ltd.
Application Number
820815
Hearing Panel
Homeniuk TF
Fox EG
Nichol JR
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Drayton Valley area
Pipeline construction permit
Conflict
Land reclamation
NTS 83G
Pipeline construction
Pipeline route
Right of way
Route selection
Soil conservation
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S42
Pipeline Act
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E82-35 on application No. 820815 for .84 km of pipeline to transport sweet multiphase fluids from a well in LSD 4-4-49-4 W5M to an existing pipeline in LSD 13-33-48-4 W5M, based on request by estate of James Murray to review application and permit No. 19051 that was routinely granted.
Interveners
Estate of James T.C. Murray
Less detail

Decision 83-25

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2296
Applicant
Petro-Canada
Application Number
830736
830737
Title
Decision on application by Petro-Canada, 1983 (sour gas pipeline, fuel gas pipeline, Benjamin field)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Petro-Canada, 1983 (sour gas pipeline, fuel gas pipeline, Benjamin field)
Date
1983
Applicant
Petro-Canada
Application Number
830736
830737
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Brushett ER
Webber HJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Benjamin field
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Gathering line
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Environmental impact
Decision D1983-8
Decision D1983-9
Guide 31
Interveners cost
Land reclamation
Land use
NTS 82O
Pipeline route
Right of way
Route selection
Soil conservation
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision D83-25 on application No. 830736 to construct 23.8 km of 88.9 and 168.3 MM outside diameter pipeline to transport sour gas from wells in LSD 11-33-28-7 W5M to gas plant in LSD 10-13-30-7 W5M and on application No. 830737 to construct 17.1 km of 60.3 MM outside diameter pipeline to transport fuel gas from existing Shell line in LSD 11-18-30-7 W5M to the well sites.
Interveners
Canterra Energy Ltd.
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Alberta Wilderness Association
Less detail

67 records – page 1 of 4.