15 records – page 1 of 1.

Decision 78-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2118
Applicant
BP Exploration Canada Limited
Application Number
770629
Title
Decision on application by BP Exploration Canada Limited, 1978 (licence to drill a well in the Chestermere Lake area)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by BP Exploration Canada Limited, 1978 (licence to drill a well in the Chestermere Lake area)
Date
1978
Applicant
BP Exploration Canada Limited
Application Number
770629
Hearing Panel
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Manyluk AF
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Chestermere Lake area
Well licence
Blowout preventer
Casing (well)
Contamination
Elkton Fm
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Geologic interpretation
Land value
Locating
NTS 82P
Oil producing
Residential building
Safety
Water pollution
Notes
Decision 78-2 on application No. 770629 for a licence to drill a well in LSD 6-15-24-28 W4M to evaluate and obtain production from the Elkton FM; Board hearing 1977-10-06; adjourned to 1977-11-09
Interveners
The Summer Village of Chestermere Leake
Comport Industries Ltd.
Argyle Management Ltd.
Scott, J.
Scott, C.
Anderson, G.
Location
06-15-024-28W4
Less detail

Decision 85-25

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision823
Applicant
Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
Application Number
850674
Title
Examiner report on application by Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited, 1985 (permit to construct a pipeline for sweet natural gas in the Coalhurst area)
Date
1985
Title
Examiner report on application by Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited, 1985 (permit to construct a pipeline for sweet natural gas in the Coalhurst area)
Date
1985
Applicant
Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
Application Number
850674
Hearing Panel
Webber HJ
Nichol JR
Lillo HO
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Lethbridge area
Pipeline construction permit
Agricultural land
Environmental impact
Gas demand
Irrigation
NTS 82H
Pipeline route
Residential building
Right of way
Route selection
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E85-25 on application No. 850674 for permit to construct 10.87 km of pipeline and related meter regulator station to transport sweet natural gas from a pipeline in LSD 8-33-9-22 W4M to proposed meter station in LSD 4-7-9-22 W4M.
Interveners
Clifton, R.
Arsene, W.
Less detail

Decision 86-12

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision227
Applicant
High Level Energy Ltd.
Application Number
860692
Title
Decision on application by High Level Energy Ltd., 1986 (well licence Leduc-Woodbend field)
Date
1986
Title
Decision on application by High Level Energy Ltd., 1986 (well licence Leduc-Woodbend field)
Date
1986
Applicant
High Level Energy Ltd.
Application Number
860692
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Paterson RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Leduc-Woodbend field
Well licence
Basal Quartz Fm
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
ERCB 83-F
Hydrogen sulphide
Land use
NTS 83H
Oil producing
Oil well
Residential building
Safety
Urban development
Water well
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
Decision D86-12 on application No. 860692 for a licence to drill a well to obtain oil from the Basal Quartz Sandstone in LSD 8-13-51-26 W4M; adjourned to 1986-07-22. request made November 1986 to defer Decision. request to continue consideration presented to Board in January 1987 and continuation granted February 1987
Interveners
County of Parkland No. 31
Wianko, K.B.
Wianko, Mrs.
Bogach, D.
Zoschke, W.
Zoschke, S.
Schindler, A.
Schindler, L.
Bates, L.H.
Ostrowski, R.J.
Scaber, J.S.
Lewicki, H.
Herzog, F.
Location
08-13-051-26W4
Less detail

Decision 87-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision236
Applicant
Diamond Shamrock Exploration of Canada Ltd.
Application Number
861141
Title
Decision on application by Diamond Shamrock Exploration of Canada Ltd., 1987 (well licence Pembina field)
Date
1987
Title
Decision on application by Diamond Shamrock Exploration of Canada Ltd., 1987 (well licence Pembina field)
Date
1987
Applicant
Diamond Shamrock Exploration of Canada Ltd.
Application Number
861141
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Bellows LA
Antonio HA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Pembina field
Pigeon Lake area
Sour gas
Well licence
Directional well
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Geologic interpretation
Leduc Fm
Locating
NTS 83G
Oil producing
Oil well
Recreational facility
Residential building
Safety
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
Decision D87-3 on application No. 861141 for a licence to drill from a surface location in LSD 10-14-47-1 W5M to a bottom hole location in LSD 16-10-47-1 W5M which underlies Pigeon Lake to obtain oil production from the Leduc FM; Board hearing 1987-01-13/14/15
Interveners
The Summer Villages of Sundance Beach
The Summer Villages of Silver Beach
The Summer Villages of Argentia Beach
The Summer Villages of Grandview
The Sisters of Charity of Providence of Western Canada
The Sisters of Charity Immaculate Conception
The Sisters of Ursulines of Jesus
Summer Villages of Golden Days
Sundance Beach
Silver Beach
Argentia Beach
Grandview
Summer Village of Itaska Beach
Summer Village of Poplar Bay
Curtis, R.M.
Gaetz, G.F.
Neufeld, H.
Slatter, E.J.
Norris, P.
Location
10-14-047-01W5
16-10-047-01W5
Less detail

Decision 87-17

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision178
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Application Number
871378
Title
Examiner report on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1987 (well licence Medicine Hat field)
Date
1987
Title
Examiner report on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1987 (well licence Medicine Hat field)
Date
1987
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Application Number
871378
Hearing Panel
Remmer WG
Moloney JK
Vrskovy MJ
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Medicine Hat field
Well licence
Glauconitic sandstone
Locating
NTS 72E
Oil well
Residential building
Well site
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
Examiners report E87-17 on application No. 871378 for a licence to drill a well from a surface location in LSD 12-15-12-5 W4M to obtain oil production from the Glauconitic Sandstone.
Interveners
Citizens' Committee of Medicine Hat
Location
12-15-012-05W4
Less detail

Decision 88-11

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision166
Applicant
Cimarron Petroleum Ltd.
ICG Resources Ltd.
Application Number
880035
880036
880037
Title
Decision on application by Cimarron Petroleum Ltd. and ICG Resources Ltd., 1988 (well licences)
Date
1988
Title
Decision on application by Cimarron Petroleum Ltd. and ICG Resources Ltd., 1988 (well licences)
Date
1988
Applicant
Cimarron Petroleum Ltd.
ICG Resources Ltd.
Application Number
880035
880036
880037
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Morin EJ
Prince JP
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Sour gas
Well licence
Directional well
Elkton Fm
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Gas well
Land use
Land value
NTS 82O
Residential building
Rundle Gp
Safety
Urban development
Water supply
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
Decision D88-11 on application No. 880035 (Cimarron) for a licence to drill a well from a surface location in LSD 13-15-26-1 W5M to obtain production from the Elkton member of the Rundle FM; on application No. 880036 (ICG resources) for a licence to drill a well in LSD 6-10-26-1 W5M to obtain production from the Elkton FM; on application No. 880037 (ICG resources) for a licence to drill a well in LSD 14-10-26-1 W5M to obtain production from the Elkton FM.
Interveners
The Niedzwiecki Family
Niedzwiecki, S.E.
C.B. Stickle Group
Stickle, B.A.
Ammerati, V.
Triple Five Corporation Ltd.
City of Calgary
Calgary Regional Planning Commission
Location
13-15-026-01W5
06-10-026-01W5
14-10-026-01W5
Less detail

Decision 88-18

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision151
Applicant
Ladd Exploration Company
Application Number
881276
Title
Decision on application by Ladd Exploration Company, 1988 (well licence Provost field)
Date
1988
Title
Decision on application by Ladd Exploration Company, 1988 (well licence Provost field)
Date
1988
Applicant
Ladd Exploration Company
Application Number
881276
Hearing Panel
Morin EJ
Homeniuk TF
Remmer WG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Provost field
Sour gas
Well licence
Agricultural land
Dina member
Environmental impact
Flare
Locating
NTS 73D
Oil producing
Oil well
Producing equipment
Residential building
Target area
Water well
Well site
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
Decision D88-18 on application No. 881276 for a licence to drill a well in LSD 16-36-38-2 W4M to explore and recover hydrocarbons from the Dina member.
Interveners
White, K.
White, T.P.
Luchyk, B.
Luchyk, J.
Paulgaard, L.A.
Paulgaard, M.
White, P.
White, R.
Location
16-36-038-02W4
Less detail

Decision 89-04|89-04 Addendum

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision138
Applicant
Phillips Petroleum Resources Ltd.
Application Number
882129
882130
Title
Decision 89-04 :Phillips Petroleum Resources Ltd.: application for permits to construct pipelines to transport sour gas and fuel gas in the Salter Field (and addendum)
Date
1989
Title
Decision 89-04 :Phillips Petroleum Resources Ltd.: application for permits to construct pipelines to transport sour gas and fuel gas in the Salter Field (and addendum)
Date
1989
Applicant
Phillips Petroleum Resources Ltd.
Application Number
882129
882130
Hearing Panel
Mink FJ
Morin EJ
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Salter field
Emergency procedure
Encroachment
Environmental impact
Land use
Land value
Locating
NTS 82O
Residential building
Right of way
Route selection
Safety
Transmission corridor
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S42
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
Decision D89-04 on application No. 882129 to construct 33 km of pipeline to transport sour gas from wells to the Petro-Canada Wildcat Hills gas plant; Board hearing opened 1989-02-14, adjourned to 1989-03-01/03/10/16; also addendum to Decision D89-4 on application for review and variance by DR. M. Hess
Interveners
Hess, Dr. M.
Holden, D.
McLenahan, J.
Bowlen, J.E.
Rocky View School Division No. 41
Herring, I.W.
Beaupre Community Association
Philip, M.
D.H. McDougall Ranch Co. Ltd.
McParlane, M.
Dawson, F.
Kun, S.F.
Ghost Pine Lumber
Less detail

Decision 91-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision55
Applicant
TransAlta Utilities Corporation
Application Number
901809
Title
Examiner report on application by TransAlta Utilities Corporation, 1991 (138-KV transmission line facilities Edson-Hinton area)
Date
1991
Title
Examiner report on application by TransAlta Utilities Corporation, 1991 (138-KV transmission line facilities Edson-Hinton area)
Date
1991
Applicant
TransAlta Utilities Corporation
Application Number
901809
Hearing Panel
Homeniuk TF
Mazurek LA
Henderson DIR
Hearing Type
Examiners
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Edson area
Electric substation
Hinton area
Transmission line
Environmental impact
Land use
Locating
NTS 83F
Residential building
Route selection
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S12
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S16
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S18
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S20
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E91-3 on application No. 901809 to construct 75 km of 138-KV transmission line between existing Bickerdike substation 39S and proposed Cold Creek substation 602S and designate it as transmission line 847L; construct 4 km of 138-KV transmission line from existing transmission line 745L, where it crosses highway 16 in the Town of Hinton, to proposed Cold Creek substation 602S; construct a 138-KV substation near Hinton and designate it as Cold Creek substation 602S; alter Bickerdike substation 39S; salvage Hinton substation 386S; salvage that portion of transmission line 745L between highway 16 and Hinton substation 386S; connect the aforementioned facilities with the applicant's transmission system and operate them.
Interveners
Evergreen Properties Inc.
North Road Lumber and Building Supplies Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 2011-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4445
Applicant
Total E&P Limited
Application Number
1445535
Title
Decision 2011-005 : Total E&P Joslyn Ltd. application for an oil sands mine and bitumen processing facility Joslyn North mine project Fort McMurray area
Date
2011
Title
Decision 2011-005 : Total E&P Joslyn Ltd. application for an oil sands mine and bitumen processing facility Joslyn North mine project Fort McMurray area
Date
2011
Applicant
Total E&P Limited
Application Number
1445535
Hearing Panel
Dilay JD
Ross B
McFadyen D
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Oil sands oil recovery
Bitumen
Oil sands
Directive 074
Environmental impact assessment
Conservation
Environmental impact
Wildlife
Vegetation
Wetland
Water
Fish
History
Paleontology
Land use
Socio-economic effect
Economic development
Noise (sound)
Reclamation
Liability (law)
Tailings - storage
Settling pond
Residential building
Public consultation
Cumulative impact assessment
Legal References
2011 ABERCB 005
Oil Sands Conservation Act S3
Oil Sands Conservation Act S24
Oil Sands Conservation Act S26
Oil Sands Conservation Regulation
Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act
Water Act
Energy Resources Conservation Act
Canadian Environmental Assessment Act
Notes
Report of the joint review panel established by the Federal Minister of the Environment and the Energy Resources Conservation Board
Change to legal citation effective January 2011
Interveners
BP Canada Energy Company
Shell Canada Limited
Syncrude Canada Limited
Belanger F member of the Dene Sioux First Nation
Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo (RMWB)
Oil Sands Environmental Coalition (OSEC)
Mikisew Cree First Nation (MCFN)
Fort McKay First Nation and Metis Nation Local #63 (Fort McKay)
Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation (ACFN)
Non-Status Fort McMurray Band Descendents, and Off-Reserve Fort McMurray Band Descendants
Sierra Club Prairie
Guertin M
Clearwater River Band No. 175
Government of Canada
Government of Alberta
Joint Review Panel (Panel) staff
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
Condition 1 – TOTAL will submit a detailed tailings management plan two years before commencement of operations, and TOTAL will clearly demonstrate its ability to meet all requirements of Directive 074. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 2 – TOTAL will devise methods for measuring fines at the project in accordance with Energy Resources Conservation Board requirements. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 3 – TOTAL will notify the Energy Resources Conservation Board in writing of any proposed pilot plants and/or demonstration plants for all technology development at least six months before construction of those facilities begins. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 4 – TOTAL will provide written updates of any previously submitted test reports by no later than February 28 each year, or as otherwise specified by the Energy Resources Conservation Board. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 5 – TOTAL will not exceed three million cubic metres of fluid in the sand beach area sumps. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 6 – One year prior to plant start-up, TOTAL will privide measurement plans to the Energy Resources Conservation Board for review and approval, including process and instrumentation diagrams, metering, sampling methods, analytical methods and, material balance procedures that satisfy Energy Resources Conservation Board measurement requirements. (Section 5.2.2) Condition 7 – TOTAL will not discharge any untreated froth treatment tailings to the tailings disposal area. (Section 5.3.2) Condition 8 – On an annual average basis, TOTAL will limit site-wide solvent losses to not more than four volumes per thousand volumes of bitumen production under any operating conditions. (Section 5.3.2) Condition 9 – On an annual average basis, TOTAL will limit the amount of asphaltene rejection to 10 mass per cent based on bitumen production. (Section 5.4.2) Condition 10 – TOTAL will submit detailed geotechnical designs for all external overburden disposal areas and reclamation stockpiles to the Energy Resources Conservation Board at least six months prior to conducting any field preparation in these areas. (Section 5.5.3) Condition 11 – TOTAL will submit to the Energy Resources Conservation Board, for its review and approval, detailed geotechnical designs and setback distances for critical infrastructure two years prior to site preparation activities for the ore preparation plant pit, the west and southern final pitwall, and for the final pitwall design and assessed setback from the Ells River. (Section 5.5.3) Condition 12 – TOTAL will provide Alberta Environment with a wildlife mitigation plan for approval prior to clearing any vegetation. The plan must achieve no net significant adverse effect on species at risk and deal with mitigating impacts to not only species at risk, but also valued wildlife. (Section 6.1.3) Condition 13 – TOTAL will monitor noise levels at James Grandejambe’s cabin. Should noise levels exceed those outlined in Directive 038, TOTAL will ensure that mitigation measures are implemented and that Directive 038 compliance is met. (Section 9.6.3) Condition 14 – TOTAL will maintain unimpeded access required for stakeholders to areas west of the project until the Moose Lake access management plan, or an equivalent, is implemented. (Section 9.7.3) Condition 15 – TOTAL will actively support and participate in the Cumulative Environmental Management Association and other regional committees to develop and use its strategies to mitigate both development and regional cumulative environmental effects. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 16 – TOTAL will limit the area of disturbance to 5000 hectares or less. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 17 – TOTAL will remove all benching on mine discard structures prior to reclaiming them. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 18 – TOTAL will provide sustainable watershed designs with vegetated watercourses for geotechnical design applications for mine discard structures. Landform watershed designs should be consistent with regionally recognized guidelines for the purpose of erosion management. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 19 – TOTAL will provide an amended mine plan to demonstrate an integrated landform and landscape design for the Canadian Natural Resources Limited – TOTAL common mine boundary to the Energy Resources Conservation Board for approval five years prior to development. The amended plan must include a discussion of the feasibility of filling the trench area between the Joslyn North and Horizon projects with mine discard. The plan must also include a discussion of the alternatives considered by TOTAL. (Section 10.2.3) Condition 20 – TOTAL will submit an annual report to the Energy Resources Conservation Board, starting two years prior to commencing mining operations, that describes its end pit lake research and development efforts for the previous year, and the current plans and timelines for determining the efficacy of its end pit lake within seven years of mine closure. This report will include all of TOTAL’s efforts and contributions with respect to collaboration on the demonstration of a full scale end pit lake. (Section 12.3)
Less detail

Decision E80-(p.027)

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1723
Applicant
Southland Royalty Company
Application Number
790614
Title
Examiners report on application by Southland Royalty Company, 1980 (licence to drill a well in the Cooking Lake area of Alberta)
Date
1980
Title
Examiners report on application by Southland Royalty Company, 1980 (licence to drill a well in the Cooking Lake area of Alberta)
Date
1980
Applicant
Southland Royalty Company
Application Number
790614
Hearing Panel
Bray JA
Edgecombe RW
Stafford GH
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Cooking Lake field
Well licence
Basal Quartz Fm
Environmental impact
Exploratory well
Geologic interpretation
Ireton Fm
Land use
Lease equipment
Locating
Negotiation
Nisku Fm
NTS 83H
Relocation
Residential building
Safety
Site survey
Wabamun Gp
Waste disposal
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
ERCB Examiners report on application No. 790614 to drill a well in LSD 8-18-52-21 W4M to evaluate all prospective oil and natural gas zones down to and including the Ireton formation.
Interveners
Rey-Nol Holdings Limited
County of Strathcona
Approval
Denied
Location
08-18-052-21W4
Less detail

Decision E80-(P.094)

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1713
Applicant
Martyshuk (John B.)
Application Number
800416
Title
Examiners report on application by Martyshuk (John B.), 1980 (relocation of a pipeline Mundare area)
Date
1980
Title
Examiners report on application by Martyshuk (John B.), 1980 (relocation of a pipeline Mundare area)
Date
1980
Applicant
Martyshuk (John B.)
Application Number
800416
Hearing Panel
Mink FJ
Fox EG
Paterson RG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Gas pipeline
Pipeline route
Relocation
Viking Kinsella field
Agricultural land
Cost analysis
Land value
NTS 83H
Residential building
Site survey
Legal References
Pipeline Act S34
Notes
ERCB Examiners report on application No. 800416 for relocation of a Northwestern Utilities Limited natural gas pipeline granted by permit No. 16723 and located in section 23-53-18 W4M.
Interveners
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Less detail

Decision E80-(p.110)

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1711
Applicant
Passburg Petroleums Ltd.
Application Number
800635
Title
Examiners report on application by Passburg Petroleums Ltd., 1980 (for a licence to drill a well in LSD 8-28-52-27 W4M)
Date
1980
Title
Examiners report on application by Passburg Petroleums Ltd., 1980 (for a licence to drill a well in LSD 8-28-52-27 W4M)
Date
1980
Applicant
Passburg Petroleums Ltd.
Application Number
800635
Hearing Panel
Warne GA
Fairbanks GH
Wolff WH
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Spruce Grove area
Well licence
Basal Quartz Fm
Environmental impact
Gas producing
Gas well
Land use
Locating
Mannville Gp
NTS 83H
Residential building
Urban development
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
ERCB Examiners report on application No. 800635 to drill a well in LSD 8-28-52-27 W4M to obtain gas production from the Mannville group.
Interveners
Centennial Acres Ltd.
Location
08-28-052-27W4
Less detail

Decision Memorandum of Decision 1991-06-20

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision52
Applicant
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
910253
Title
Memorandum of Decision on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd, 1991 (well licence Okotoks field)
Date
1991
Title
Memorandum of Decision on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd, 1991 (well licence Okotoks field)
Date
1991
Applicant
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
910253
Hearing Type
Prehearing
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Okotoks field
Well licence
Calgary area
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Gas well
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
Land use
NTS 82I
NTS 82O
Residential building
Safety
Sour gas
Urban development
Notes
Memorandum of Decision on application No. 910253 by Canadian Occidental for a licence for a well to be drilled from a surface location in Lsd 6 Sec 18 Twp 22 Rge 28 W4M, for the purpose of obtaining production from the Wabamun FM and the proposed well would be expected to encounter significant quantities of H2S; prehearing meeting held 1991-04-19; dated 1991-06-20
Interveners
Over the Hill Community Group
CastleridgeIFalconridge Community Association
Burnco Rock Products Limited
Carma Developers Limited
Ollerenshaw Ranch Management
Calgary Board of Health
The City of Calgary
Bow North Surface Rights Association Chestermere Area
Sidorsky A
Canadian Green Party
Alberta Greens
Lakey N
O'Ferrall B
Benien RA
Giga A
Langlois M
Snider J
Penaton J
Edie D
Carlson N
Brown T
Edwards P
Hetherington B
Fisher R
Abranovitch P
Location
06-18-022-28W4
Less detail

Decision Memorandum of Decision 1992-04-12

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision33
Applicant
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
911089
910253
Title
Memorandum of Decision on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd, 1992 (well licences Okotoks field)
Date
1992
Title
Memorandum of Decision on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd, 1992 (well licences Okotoks field)
Date
1992
Applicant
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
911089
910253
Hearing Type
Prehearing
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Okotoks field
Well licence
Calgary area
Environmental impact
Guide 8
ERCB hearing
Gas well
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
Land use
NTS 82I
NTS 82O
Residential building
Safety
Sour gas
Notes
Memorandum of Decision on applications No. 910253 and No. 911089 for licences for two wells to be drilled from a surface location in Lsd 6 Sec 18 Twp 22 Rge 28 W4M to evaluate and obtain production from the Wabamun FM; the Board had received a suggestion that it may be appropriate to defer the hearing of the applications and review the proposed timing and procedure for the consideration of the applications; at pre-hearing meeting held 1992-02-18 application No. 910253 was withdrawn Memorandum of Decision dated 1992-03-12
Location
06-18-022-28W4
Less detail

15 records – page 1 of 1.