11 records – page 1 of 1.

Decision 74-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2179
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
7462
Title
Decision 74-03: Annual reserves and maximum rate limitations for oil pools
Date
1974
Title
Decision 74-03: Annual reserves and maximum rate limitations for oil pools
Date
1974
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
7462
Hearing Panel
Strom NA
Stafford GH
Webber HJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil supply
Descriptors
Alderson field
Alexis field
Boundary Lake field
Edson field
Judy Creek field
Medicine River field
MRL
Oil reserve
Pembina field
Pouce Coupe field
Rainbow field
Recovery factor
St. Albert-Big Lake field
Sturgeon Lake field
Utikuma Lake field
NTS 72L
NTS 83B
NTS 83F
NTS 83G
NTS 83H
NTS 83J
NTS 83M
NTS 83N
NTS 84B
NTS 84D
NTS 84L
Notes
Decision 74-3 on proceeding No. 7462 respecting crude oil reserves and maximum rate limitations in selected specified pools; Examiners' hearing 1974-01-28/29/30
Less detail

Decision 79-A

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2344
Applicant
Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
Application Number
780318
Title
Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, part 8)
Date
1979
Title
Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, part 8)
Date
1979
Applicant
Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
Application Number
780318
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Evans RG
Kupchanko EE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Great Canadian Oil Sands
Oil mining
Suncor plant
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Air quality
Athabasca River
Benefit cost analysis
Delayed coking
Effluent
Emission
Environmental impact
Expansion
Material balance
Mine design
NTS 74E
Open pit mining
Overburden ratio
Plant design
Pollution control
Recovery factor
Socio-economic effect
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Surface mining
Upgrading
Waste disposal
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S43
Notes
ERCB report 79-A on application No. 780318 to amend approval No. 1944 to modify and expand existing facilities located in TP.92-93, R.10, W4M; Board hearing 1979-01-30/31
Less detail

Decision 79-E

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2340
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
770866
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Section 43 and Coal Conservation Act, Section 27)
Date
1979
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Section 43 and Coal Conservation Act, Section 27)
Date
1979
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
770866
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Berkowitz N
Bohme VE
Solodzuk W
Isbister WD
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cold Lake area
Cold Lake heavy oil project
Heavy oil project
Steam injection
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Viscous oil recovery
Benefit cost analysis
Bituminous deposit
Coal - fuel
Environmental impact
IL-OG-74-05
Flexicoking
Industrial development permit
Manufactured crude oil
Material balance
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 73L
Recovery factor
Reserve
Socio-economic effect
Upgrading
Waste disposal
Waste water
Water supply
Well spacing
Legal References
Coal Conservation Act S27
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S43
Notes
ERCB Report 79-E on application no. 770866 to produce and upgrade crude bitumen and for an industrial development permit to use coal as a fuel for the project (TP.64-65, R.3-4, W4M); Board hearing 1978-09-05 adjourned to 1978-12-04 through 1978-12-20 and 1979-01-03 through 1979-01-08 and 1979-05-29/30/31; Report 81-C on application (Application no. 800664) to change makeup fuel and ERCB Decision D83-21 for later application (No. 830620) for phased development of the project
Less detail

Decision 81-C

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2319
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
800664
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1981 make-up fuel ESSO Cold Lake Project (natural gas vs coal as make-up fuel)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1981 make-up fuel ESSO Cold Lake Project (natural gas vs coal as make-up fuel)
Date
1981
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
800664
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cold Lake area
Cold Lake heavy oil project
Cyclic steam injection
Heavy oil project
In situ
Steam injection
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Boiler
Coal - fuel
Coal gasification
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
ERCB 79-E
Fuel consumption
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 73L
Recovery factor
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S40
Notes
ERCB report 81-C on application No. 800664 to use natural gas as make-up fuel rather than coal; Board hearing 1980-10-08/09/10 see also ERCB report 79-E for original Decision on Cold Lake project, Decision D83-21 for Decision on later application (No. 830620) for phased development of the project, Decision D84-6 on application to proceed with phases 3&4 and Decision D85-17 on application to proceed with phases 5&6.
Less detail

Decision 83-24

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2273
Applicant
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Application Number
830222
Title
Decision on application by Texaco Canada Resources Ltd., 1983 (for tertiary miscible scheme Wizard Lake D-3A pool)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Texaco Canada Resources Ltd., 1983 (for tertiary miscible scheme Wizard Lake D-3A pool)
Date
1983
Applicant
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Application Number
830222
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Enhanced recovery scheme
Miscible displacement
Tertiary recovery
Wizard Lake field
Monitoring
NTS 83H
Oil recovery
Oil reserve
Oil saturation
Recovery factor
Reservoir characteristic
Reservoir performance
Reservoir pressure
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision D83-24 on application No. 830222 for approval to extend vertical hydrocarbon miscible flood into waterflushed zone of the Wizard Lake D-3A pool (TP.48, R27,W4M).
Interveners
Chevron Canada Resources Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Less detail

Decision 83-26

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2271
Applicant
Home Oil Company Limited
Application Number
830674
Title
Decision on application by Home Oil Company Limited, 1983 (hydrocarbon miscible flooe, Swan Hills Beaverhill Lake A&B pool unit no. 1)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Home Oil Company Limited, 1983 (hydrocarbon miscible flooe, Swan Hills Beaverhill Lake A&B pool unit no. 1)
Date
1983
Applicant
Home Oil Company Limited
Application Number
830674
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Enhanced recovery scheme
Miscible displacement
Swan Hills field
Beaverhill Lake Fm
Design criteria
Development well
Economic analysis
Injection well
Monitoring
NTS 83J
Oil recovery
Oil saturation
Recovery factor
Reservoir model
Sweep efficiency
Unitized field
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision D83-26 on application No. 830674 to implement a hydrocarbon miscible flood in the Swan Hills Beaverhill Lake A&B pool unit No. 1 (TP.66-68, R.9-11, W5M).
Interveners
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Esso Resources Canada Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 84-13

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1841
Applicant
Canadian Reserve Oil and Gas Ltd.
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Application Number
830847
840013
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Reserve Oil And Gas Ltd. and Texaco Canada Resources Ltd., 1984 enhanced oil recovery Pembina Nisku N pool)
Date
1984
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Reserve Oil And Gas Ltd. and Texaco Canada Resources Ltd., 1984 enhanced oil recovery Pembina Nisku N pool)
Date
1984
Applicant
Canadian Reserve Oil and Gas Ltd.
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Application Number
830847
840013
Hearing Panel
Strom NA
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Enhanced recovery scheme
Miscible displacement
Pembina field
Waterflooding
Economic analysis
Geologic interpretation
Negotiation
Nisku Fm
NTS 83G
Petroleum conservation
Recovery factor
Reservoir model
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision D84-13 on application No. 830847 by Canadian Reserve for approval of enhanced recovery by water injection and on application No. 840013 by Texaco for approval of a miscible flood scheme, both applications for the Nisku N pool (TP.50, R.11, W5M).
Less detail

Decision 85-15

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1680
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
840227
Title
Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1985 (commercial oil sands project (phase 1) Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1985 (commercial oil sands project (phase 1) Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
840227
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Carbon dioxide injection
Cyclic steam injection
Elk Point area
Elk Point project
In situ
Industrial plant
Lindbergh field
Steam flooding
Steam injection
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Air quality
Bitumen
Cleaning
Contamination
Disposal well
Emission
Environmental impact
ID-80-02
Hydrogen sulphide
Land reclamation
Land use
Locating
Monitoring
NTS 73E
Noise (sound)
Pollution
Recovery factor
Recycling
Socio-economic effect
Waste disposal
Water disposal
Water supply
Water well
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
Decision D85-15 (with addendum) on application No. 840227 for approval of phase 1 of a three phase commercial oil sands project (Elk Point project) in Lindbergh sector of Cold Lake oil sands deposits, consisting of 13-well cyclic steam and steam flood stimulation project on 2 Hectare well spacing and a 640 CU. M./day bitumen cleaning plant (TP.54-46, R.5-7 W4M); Board hearing 1985-01-08/09/12/15-18/21-23
Interveners
Kadutski, D.
Kadutski, C.
Kadutski, M.
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Keith, L.
Group of Elk Point -Lindbergh Area Residents
Town of Elk Point
County of St. Paul
Westmin Resources Limited
Less detail

Decision 85-36

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision983
Applicant
Murphy Oil Company Limited.
Application Number
841338
Title
Decision on application by Murphy Oil Company Limited, 1985 (commercial oil sands project phase 1, Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Murphy Oil Company Limited, 1985 (commercial oil sands project phase 1, Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Applicant
Murphy Oil Company Limited.
Application Number
841338
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bellows LA
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cyclic steam injection
Elk Point area
In situ
Lindbergh area
Lindbergh thermal recovery project
Steam injection
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Agricultural land
Air quality
Community relations
Directional well
Drilling fluid
Drilling Waste disposal
Electric power distribution
Environmental impact
Land reclamation
NTS 73L
Recovery factor
Right of way
Transmission corridor
Waste disposal
Water supply
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
Decision D85-36 on application No. 841338 for approval in principle of the Lindbergh thermal recovery project (being an expansion of an experimental scheme operating in section 13-58-5 W4M) and to construct and operate phase 1 to recover crude bitumen from the Cold Lake oil sands deposits using a cyclic steam stimulation recovery technique; Board hearing 1985-06-18 and 1985-07-03/04/05
Interveners
Opanavicius, A.
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Elizabeth Metis Settlement Association No.9 and Federation of Metis Settlements
Town of Elk Point
Dome Petroleum Limited
Alberta Municipal Affairs
Less detail

Decision 88-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision174
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
870848
Title
Examiner report on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.,1988 (Carrot Creek Cardium D pool)
Date
1988
Title
Examiner report on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.,1988 (Carrot Creek Cardium D pool)
Date
1988
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
870848
Hearing Panel
Berndtsson NG
Dilay JD
Vrskovy MJ
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Carrot Creek field
Enhanced recovery scheme
Gas injection
Pressure maintenance
Water injection
Cardium Fm
Decision D1982-20
NTS 83G
Recovery factor
Unitized field
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E88-1 on application No. 870848 to approve an enhanced recovery scheme by water and gas injection in part of the Carrot Creek Cardium D pool.
Interveners
Cooperative Energy Development Corporation
Less detail

Decision 2005-04

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3915
Applicant
EPCOR Energy Services Alberta Inc.
Application Number
1348830
Title
Decision 2005-004: EPCOR Energy Alberta Inc. recovery of retail adjustment to market charges
Date
2005
Title
Decision 2005-004: EPCOR Energy Alberta Inc. recovery of retail adjustment to market charges
Date
2005
Applicant
EPCOR Energy Services Alberta Inc.
Application Number
1348830
Hearing Panel
Lock RG
Miller GJ
Douglas JI
Hearing Type
Utilities - rate
Written hearing
Utilities
Category
Electric power rate
Descriptors
Decision D2004 74
Marketing
Recovery
Recovery factor
Regulated rate tariff
Approval
Denied
Less detail

11 records – page 1 of 1.