13 records – page 1 of 1.

Decision 88-04

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision183
Applicant
Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
Application Number
871530
Title
Examiner report on application by Husky Oil Operations Limited, 1988 (well site access road review)
Date
1988
Title
Examiner report on application by Husky Oil Operations Limited, 1988 (well site access road review)
Date
1988
Applicant
Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
Application Number
871530
Hearing Panel
Homeniuk TF
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Production facility
Descriptors
Well licence
Well site
Accident
Grazing land
Liability (Law)
NTS 73E
Road construction
Safety
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E88-04 on application No. 871530 for a review of the licences governing access to wells located in LSD 3,5,13 of section 3, TP.52, R.4 W4M; Examiners meeting held 1988-01-06
Location
03-03-052-04W4
05-03-052-04W4
13-03-052-04W4
Less detail

Decision 88-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision191
Applicant
Poco Petroleums Ltd.
Application Number
871417
Title
Examiner report on application by Poco Petroleums Ltd., 1988 (battery compressor station west Sullivan Lake area)
Date
1988
Title
Examiner report on application by Poco Petroleums Ltd., 1988 (battery compressor station west Sullivan Lake area)
Date
1988
Applicant
Poco Petroleums Ltd.
Application Number
871417
Hearing Panel
Nichol JR
Lillo HO
Schnitzler WJ
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Production facility
Descriptors
Battery
Compressor station
Endiang field
Spiers field
Deliverability
Environmental impact
Lease equipment
Locating
Gas recovery
Noise (sound)
NTS 83A
Pollution
Producing equipment
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.002
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E88-08 on application No. 871417 for an amendment of approval No. G0900 to allow for the construction and operation of a battery compressor station in the west Sullivan Lake area.
Interveners
Somerville, R.M.
Less detail

Decision 88-16

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision150
Applicant
Able Resources Limited
Application Number
881850
Title
Examiner report on application by ABLE resources Ltd., 1988 (temporary battery application)
Date
1988
Title
Examiner report on application by ABLE resources Ltd., 1988 (temporary battery application)
Date
1988
Applicant
Able Resources Limited
Application Number
881850
Hearing Panel
Nichol JR
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Production facility
Descriptors
Battery
Morinville area
St. Albert area
Environmental impact
Gas producing
Locating
NTS 83H
Producing equipment
Oil producing
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E88-16 on application No. 881850 for a temporary battery approval for the production testing of oil and gas from the well 14-4-55-24 W4M; Examiners on-site meeting held 1988-09-1 hearing 1988-11-09
Interveners
Loughlin, A.R.
Poekens, Mr.
Poekens, Mrs.
Vrdolak, C.
Location
14-04-055-24W4
Less detail

Decision 93-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision18
Applicant
Skinner (Simon and Michael)
Amax Petroleum of Canada Inc.
Application Number
910526
910289
910790
910972
910890
910891
910892
910893
910894
910895
910896
910897
910898
910899
910900
910901
910902
910903
910904
910905
Title
Decision 93-03 : Simon and Michael Skinner and Amax Petroleum of Canada Inc.: Applications for review or development of facilities, wells, spacing order and holdings Hayter field, Provost area
Date
1993
Title
Decision 93-03 : Simon and Michael Skinner and Amax Petroleum of Canada Inc.: Applications for review or development of facilities, wells, spacing order and holdings Hayter field, Provost area
Date
1993
Applicant
Skinner (Simon and Michael)
Amax Petroleum of Canada Inc.
Application Number
910526
910289
910790
910972
910890
910891
910892
910893
910894
910895
910896
910897
910898
910899
910900
910901
910902
910903
910904
910905
Hearing Panel
Mink FJ
Bietz BF
Berndtsson NG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Production facility
Spacing
Well licence
Descriptors
Hayter field
Pipeline construction permit
Producing equipment
Provost area
Well licence
Battery
Cattle
Dina member
Emission
Environmental impact
Livestock
Mannville Gp
Oil producing
Socio-economic effect
Sour crude
NTS 73D
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S42
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S71
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S5.190
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
Notes
ERCB decision D93-3 on application no. 910526 by Simon and Michael Skinner for a review of wells, facilities and spacing order and on applications no. 910289, 910790, 910972 and 910890-910905 inclusive by Amax Petroleum for holdings, spacing order, wells and facilities all in the Hayter Field in the Provost area; Board hearing 1992-01-13 to 17, 1992-01-27 to 31, 1992-02-24 to 28, 1992-04-13/14/21 to 24 , 1992-05-04-06
Interveners
Alberta Environmental Centre
Alberta Cattle Commission
Christian Farmers Federation of Alberta
Shell Caroline Agricultural Society
Taylor, N.
Bocock, W.E.
Less detail

Decision 93-03 Addendum (97/01/13)

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2608
Applicant
Anderson Oil and Gas Inc.
Skinner (Simon and Michael)
Application Number
1003897
Title
Decision 93-03 Addendum : Anderson Oil & Gas Inc.: Application to suspend Clause 5, Subclause (B) of Decision D93-03 Simon and Michael Skinner Hayter Field, Provost Area)
Date
1997
Title
Decision 93-03 Addendum : Anderson Oil & Gas Inc.: Application to suspend Clause 5, Subclause (B) of Decision D93-03 Simon and Michael Skinner Hayter Field, Provost Area)
Date
1997
Applicant
Anderson Oil and Gas Inc.
Skinner (Simon and Michael)
Application Number
1003897
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Production facility
Descriptors
Battery
Hayter field
Provost area
Abandonment
Cattle
Environmental impact
Livestock
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S42
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Addendum to Decision D93-3 on application to waive requirements of Decision D93-3. Decision D93-3 on application no. 910526 by Simon and Michael Skinner contained a number of directions including clause 5, subclause (B). This clause required the nine wells located in the Skinners pasture to be abandoned and site reclamation started by 2 March 1997. Anderson, the current licensee applied to have the requirements of clause 5, subclause (B) of Decision D93-3 waived, with the agreement of the Skinners.
Less detail

Decision 2000-17

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3163
Applicant
Shell Canada Ltd.
Application Number
1040416
1040417
1040418
1041202
1044487
1044489
Title
Decision 2000-17: Shell Canada Ltd. application to drill four critical sour gas wells and construct and operate related pipeline and facilities, Castle River area
Date
2000
Title
Decision 2000-17: Shell Canada Ltd. application to drill four critical sour gas wells and construct and operate related pipeline and facilities, Castle River area
Date
2000
Applicant
Shell Canada Ltd.
Application Number
1040416
1040417
1040418
1041202
1044487
1044489
Hearing Panel
Bietz BF
Sharp KG
Remmer WG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Production facility
Gas production
Descriptors
Castle River area
NTS 82H
Pipeline construction
Sour gas
Well licence
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Pipeline Act, Part 4
Notes
Decision on applications to drill two horizontal sour gas wells from a surface location in LSD 6, S.17, Twn.6, R.2, W5M and two horizontal sour gas wells from a surface location overlapping LSDs 10 and 15, S.7, Twn.6, R.2, W5M. Shell also applied to construct and operate pipeline and related facilites.
Interveners
Canadian 88 Energy Corporation
Neufleld R
Moores G
Sawyer M
Rennie J
Tweedie J
Wilson SD
Kennedy WY
Baker J
Beken A
Brown M
Powell R
Gill GR
Dowling G
Ceh F
Thompson G
Eccles R
Neville M
Horejsi B
Judd B
Touche L
Approval
Approved
Location
06-17-006-02W5
10-15-007-02W5
Less detail

Decision 2000-18

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3164
Applicant
Canadian 88 Energy Corp.
Application Number
1040292
1045916
Title
Decision 2000-18: Canadian 88 Energy Corporation application to drill a critical sour gas well and construct a pipeline and related facilities, Castle River area
Date
2000
Title
Decision 2000-18: Canadian 88 Energy Corporation application to drill a critical sour gas well and construct a pipeline and related facilities, Castle River area
Date
2000
Applicant
Canadian 88 Energy Corp.
Application Number
1040292
1045916
Hearing Panel
Bietz BF
Sharp KG
Remmer WG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Production facility
Gas production
Descriptors
Castle River area
NTS 82H
IL 93-09
Pipeline construction
Sour gas
Well licence
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
Decision on application to drill one directional sour gas well from a surface location overlapping LSD 10 and 15, S.7, Twn.6, R.2, W5M. Canadian 88 also applied to construct and operate pipeline and related facilites.
Interveners
Shell Canada Ltd.
Densted S
Gilmore B
Jamieson J
Kilgour I
Minchau M
Mulzet G
Johnson K
Mead D
Leahey D
Eccles R
Neufeld R
Moores G
Gill GR
Dowling G
Ceh F
Thompson G
Neville M
Judd M
Touche L
Sawyer M
Horejsi B
Rennie J
Tweedie J
Wilson SD
Kennedy WY
Baker J
Beken A
Brown M
Powell R
Approval
Approved
Location
10-07-006-02W5
15-07-006-02W5
Less detail

Decision 2001-09

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3328
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
1042932
Title
Decision 2001-09: Shell Canada Ltd. application for a well licence, Shell PCP Ferrier 7-7-38-6W5, Ferrier field
Date
2001
Title
Decision 2001-09: Shell Canada Ltd. application for a well licence, Shell PCP Ferrier 7-7-38-6W5, Ferrier field
Date
2001
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
1042932
Hearing Panel
Bietz BF
Dilay JD
McGee TM
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Production facility
Gas production
Descriptors
Ellerslie Member
NTS 83B
Ostracod
Sour gas
Swan Hills Fm
Well licence
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
Decision on application to drill a level 4 critical sour gas well to be located at L.S. 7 of S.7, Twn.38, R. 6 W5M, The well would be drilled for the purpose of evaluating and obtaining gas production from the Ostracod, Ellerslie, and Swan Hills zones. Having carefully considered all the evidence, the AEUB is of the view that the emergency response plan proposed by Shell has not adequately addressed safety requirements unique to the area.
Interveners
The Clearwater Coalition
Berry L.
Bertagnolli B
Bertagnolli M
Bosworth B
Bosworth E
Courtwright L
Day M
Foster B
Manuel F
McAllister A
Morton J
Scott M
Shipley C
Tait E
Titford C
Zalasky M
Zalasky R
Nyland E
Springer WA
Dowsett IP
Erwin CW
Howery DG
ENY Consultants Inc.
RWDI West Inc.
Applications Management Consulting Ltd.
Dahlgren S
Tougas, Hardill, and Brown (the Clearwater Community)
Fitch GS
Tougas MC
Tougas B
Hardill K
Brown B
Moncur MC
David Thompson Health Region (DTHR)
Zimmer R
Lambert T
van Tol J
Diedrich E
Vavrek V
Vavrek J
Approval
Denied
Location
07-07-038-06W5
Less detail

Decision 2001-34

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3368
Applicant
ATCO Pipelines
Application Number
1055407
Title
Decision 2001-34 : ATCO Pipelines application to construct and operate a natural gas pipeline, Edmonton area
Date
2001
Title
Decision 2001-34 : ATCO Pipelines application to construct and operate a natural gas pipeline, Edmonton area
Date
2001
Applicant
ATCO Pipelines
Application Number
1055407
Hearing Panel
Dilay JD
McGee TM
Langlo CA
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Production facility
Pipelines
Gas production
Descriptors
Decision D2001-33
Gas pipeline
NTS 73H
Pipeline construction
Rossdale power plant
Legal References
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
Decision on application for approval to construct and operate a natural gas pipeline from the Edmonton Ethane Extraction Plant to the Rossdale Power Plant owned by EPCOR.
Interveners
EPCOR Power Development Corporation
EPCOR Generating Inc.
Alberta Community Development
Alberta Environment
Alberta Health and Wellness
First Peoples/First Settlers (FPFS)
Metis Nation of Alberta
Confederation of Treaty Six First Nations (Treaty Six)
Chief and Council of Papachase First Nations
Hurt L
Ives J
Good Striker D
Coutu P
Graves J
Desjarlais C
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision 2001-73

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3403
Applicant
Calpine Canada Resources Ltd.
Application Number
1069517
1069518
Title
Decision 2001-73 : Calpine Canada Resources Ltd. sour natural gas battery and sour natural gas pipeline, Battle Lake project
Date
2001
Title
Decision 2001-73 : Calpine Canada Resources Ltd. sour natural gas battery and sour natural gas pipeline, Battle Lake project
Date
2001
Applicant
Calpine Canada Resources Ltd.
Application Number
1069517
1069518
Hearing Panel
Dilay JD
Remmer WG
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Production facility
Gas production
Descriptors
ID 81-03
ID 96-02
ID 97-06
Gas processing plant
NTS 83B
Pipeline construction
Sour gas
Well licence
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S29
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
Decision on applications to build a sour natural gas battery to be located in LS 4, S.4, Tp.46, R.2, W5M. Calpine also applied to construct and operate a sour natural gas pipeline for the purpose of transporting sour natural gas from the proposed battery.
Interveners
Hannemann P
Hannemann N
Benedetto R
Ollenberger C
Granger J
Reid J
Bachand E
Bachand T
Dyck A
Dyck D
Blackmore B
Approval
Approved
Location
04-04-046-02W5
Less detail

Decision 2006-96

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4179
Applicant
EnCana Corporation
Application Number
1441037
Title
Decision 2006-096 EnCana Corporation application for a gas plant licence, Entice Field
Date
2006
Title
Decision 2006-096 EnCana Corporation application for a gas plant licence, Entice Field
Date
2006
Applicant
EnCana Corporation
Application Number
1441037
Hearing Panel
McGee TM
Sharp KG
Remmer WG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Production facility
Descriptors
Construction permit
Entice Field
Gas processing plant
NTS 82P
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7
Interveners
Rodzen D
Rodzen S
Brander H
Brander L
Approval
Approved
Location
05-31-027-26W4
Less detail

Decision 2007-69|2007-69 Errata

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4246
Applicant
Advance Oil & Gas Ltd.
Application Number
1481043
1481044
1481045
Title
Decision 2007-069: Advantage Oil & Gas Ltd. applications for facility licences, Chip Lake Field (and Errata)
Date
2007
Title
Decision 2007-069: Advantage Oil & Gas Ltd. applications for facility licences, Chip Lake Field (and Errata)
Date
2007
Applicant
Advance Oil & Gas Ltd.
Application Number
1481043
1481044
1481045
Hearing Panel
McGee TM
Waisman DD
Rahnama F
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Production facility
Descriptors
Cold Lake field
NTS 73L
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
Interveners
Chip Lake Group
Hermann R
Hermann M
Hertwig-Jaksch H
Nikolayuk S
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
APPENDIX 3 COMMITMENTS BETWEEN ADVANTAGE OIL & GAS LTD. AND THE CHIP LAKE GROUP 6 Section 1 - Site specific commitments of Advantage Section 2 - Operations commitments of Advantage Section 3 - Meetings/Communications commitments of Advantage Section 4 - Miscellaneous commitments of Advantage Section 5 - Commitments of members of the Chip Lake Group
Location
05-13-053-10W5
16-11-053-10W5
03-12-053-10W5
Less detail

Decision 2013-19

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4517
Applicant
Grizzly Resources Ltd.
Sinopec Daylight Energy Ltd.
Application Number
1707770
1723456
1723458
1723460
1723486
1723491
1759037
1759038
1759044
1759045
1728964
Title
Decision 2013-19 : Grizzly Resources Ltd. and Sinopect Daylight Energy Ltd : applications for well, pipeline and facility licenses and a regulatory appeal of a pipeline licence Pembina Field
Date
2013
Title
Decision 2013-19 : Grizzly Resources Ltd. and Sinopect Daylight Energy Ltd : applications for well, pipeline and facility licenses and a regulatory appeal of a pipeline licence Pembina Field
Date
2013
Applicant
Grizzly Resources Ltd.
Sinopec Daylight Energy Ltd.
Application Number
1707770
1723456
1723458
1723460
1723486
1723491
1759037
1759038
1759044
1759045
1728964
Hearing Panel
Bolton AH
McManus RC
Eynon G
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Production facility
Pipelines
Descriptors
Pipeline licence
Facility licence
Well licence
Pembina field
Hydrogen sulphide
Consultation
Health
Safety
Emergency response plan
Right of property
Environmental impact
Legal References
REDA General Regulation
Energy Resources Conservation Act
Oil and Gas Conservation Act
Pipeline Act
REDA Transition Regulation
Responsible Energy Development Act (REDA) D2
Energy Resources Conservation Act S40
Energy Resources Conservation Act S39
Responsible Energy Development Act (REDA) D40
Responsible Energy Development Act (REDA) D41
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Pipeline Act Part 4
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
Notes
Change to legal citation effective January 2011
Directive 056: Energy Development Applications and Schedules
Directive 036: Drilling Blowout Prevention Requirements and Procedures
Industry Recommended Practice (IRP) Volume 1: Critical Sour Drilling
Directive 071: Emergency Preparedness and Response Requirements for the Petroleum Industry
Directive 060: Upstream Petroleum Industry Flaring, Incinerating, and Venting
Assessment of the Potential Human Health Impacts Associated with a Series of Hypothetical Sour Crude Oil Release Scenarios During Production Operations (2008 Intrinsik report)
Report on Health Effects associated with Risk Assessment Endpoints (2013 Intrinsik report)
Health Effects Associated with Short Term Exposure to Low Levels of Hydrogen Sulphide (H2S)—A Technical Review
ERCB Report 90-B (Volume 6): Risk Approach, An approach for Estimating Risk to Public Safety from Uncontrolled Sour Gas Releases
Interveners
Farmer D
Wong A
Gilmour B
Naffin D
Prentice C
Domke R
Dupperon L
Kelly S
Kerpan C
Losey T
McGinn L
Warnock A
Warnock D
Bishop DP
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
Grizzly must drill the 1-8 well as a critical sour well even though it is not classified as one. All equipment and practices used to drill the 1-8 well must meet or exceed the requirements for critical sour wells in AER Directive 036: Drilling Blowout Prevention Requirements and Procedures and Enform’s Industry Recommended Practice (IRP) Volume 1: Critical Sour Drilling.
Grizzly must restrict flaring at the 1-8 well to no longer than a single period that lasts no longer than six hours during drilling and completion.
Location
07-05-050-06W5
01-08-050-06W5
06-03-050-06W5
13-02-050-06W5
04-02-050-06W5
13-35-049-06W5
03-02-050-06W5
04-24-050-06W5
16-14-050-06W5
09-05-050-06W5
14-05-050-06W5
10-05-050-06W5
16-29-048-09W5
Less detail

13 records – page 1 of 1.