9 records – page 1 of 1.

Decision 79-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2093
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Application Number
780619
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd., 1979 (industrial development permit to manufacture substitute natural gas)
Date
1979
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd., 1979 (industrial development permit to manufacture substitute natural gas)
Date
1979
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Application Number
780619
Hearing Panel
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Bruderheim area
Industrial development permit
Manufactured gas
Benefit cost analysis
Byproduct
Cost analysis
Demand (economics)
Efficiency
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 83H
Pentanes plus
Plant design
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 79-3 on application No. 780619 to construct a substitute natural gas plant near Bruderheim, to use byproduct from the Petalta benzene plant and natural gas as feedstock and fuel in the manufacture of the SNG; see related Decision 79-4 for Decision on gas removal application
Interveners
Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd.
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Dow Chemical of Canada Ltd.
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Pan-Alberta Gas Ltd.
TransCanada PipeLines Limited
Turbo Resources Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 79-16

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2080
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
790279
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1979 (Keephills power plant units 1 and 2 amendment report)
Date
1979
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1979 (Keephills power plant units 1 and 2 amendment report)
Date
1979
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
790279
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Goodman CJ
Warne GA
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Electric power
Descriptors
Electric power project
Keephills power project
Thermal power plant
Coal reserve
Conflict
Cooling
Cooling system
Design criteria
Land reclamation
NTS 83G
Pipeline
Plant design
Reservoir
Revision
Waste heat
Water treating
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S7
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Notes
Decision 79-16 on application No. 790279 to amend approval No. HE 7852 for changes in layout and design of Keephills thermal power plant relating to cooling pond, circulating water intake & discharge canals, raw water storage pond, make-up & blowdown pipelines, rail access & other associated facilities (TP.51-52, R.3-4, W5M); Board hearing 1979-07-13/19 and 1979-08-30; see earlier Decisions ERCB report 77-AA and Decision 78-12
Interveners
Quigg, A.
Quigg, R.
Trans World Oil and Gas Ltd.
Porter Ranches Limited
Ewashko, J.
Less detail

Decision 79-A

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2344
Applicant
Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
Application Number
780318
Title
Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, part 8)
Date
1979
Title
Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, part 8)
Date
1979
Applicant
Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
Application Number
780318
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Evans RG
Kupchanko EE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Great Canadian Oil Sands
Oil mining
Suncor plant
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Air quality
Athabasca River
Benefit cost analysis
Delayed coking
Effluent
Emission
Environmental impact
Expansion
Material balance
Mine design
NTS 74E
Open pit mining
Overburden ratio
Plant design
Pollution control
Recovery factor
Socio-economic effect
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Surface mining
Upgrading
Waste disposal
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S43
Notes
ERCB report 79-A on application No. 780318 to amend approval No. 1944 to modify and expand existing facilities located in TP.92-93, R.10, W4M; Board hearing 1979-01-30/31
Less detail

Decision 79-AA

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2391
Applicant
Alberta. Dept. of the Environment
Alberta Power Limited
Forestburg Collieries Limited
Manalta Coal Ltd.
Edmonton Power
Application Number
9759
770364
780041
780024
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Power Ltd., Forestburg Collieries Limited and Manalta Coal Ltd., 1979 (Sheerness mine and the construction and operation of proposed Sheerness thermal power plant) and on application by Edmonton Power Ltd., 1979 (Genesee thermal power plant and Genesee mine)
Date
1979
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Power Ltd., Forestburg Collieries Limited and Manalta Coal Ltd., 1979 (Sheerness mine and the construction and operation of proposed Sheerness thermal power plant) and on application by Edmonton Power Ltd., 1979 (Genesee thermal power plant and Genesee mine)
Date
1979
Applicant
Alberta. Dept. of the Environment
Alberta Power Limited
Forestburg Collieries Limited
Manalta Coal Ltd.
Edmonton Power
Application Number
9759
770364
780041
780024
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Thiessen HW
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Coal
Descriptors
Coal mine
Coal project
Electric power project
Genesee mine
Genesee power plant
Roselyn mine
Sheerness mine
Sheerness power plant
Thermal power plant
Alberta
Benefit cost analysis
Capacity
Coal - fuel
Comparison
Cooling system
Cost analysis
Electric power demand
Environmental impact
Locating
Mine design
NTS 72M
NTS 83G
Planning
Plant design
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Coal Conservation Act S10
Coal Conservation Act S21
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S7
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Notes
ERCB Report 79-AA (with separate addendum) on application No. 9759 by Alberta Power for plant near Sheerness and connection to its electric system, application No. 770364 by Forestburg to develop a mine site near Sheerness to supply proposed Power Plant, application No, 780041 by Manalta to extend Roselyn mine (Mine No. 443) at Sheerness to supply part of coal for proposed Sheerness power plant (Sheerness in TP.24-31, R.11-16, W4M) and on application No. 780024 by Edmonton Power thermal power plant at Genesee and mine site at Genesee to supply coal to fuel the plant (TP.48-51, R.1-4, W5M); See also ERCB Report 82-C for decision on later application by Edmonton Power to advance the commissioning dates for Genesee plant; Board hearing on Sheerness 1978-05-16/17/18/19; Board hearing on Genesee 1978-07-25/26/27/28 & 1978-08-02/03/04
Interveners
Alberta Power Limited
McDermid, N
Provost, K
Frey, JR
Leahy, DM
Griffing, TC
Kolisnyk, Z
Manalta Coal Ltd.
Forsyth, GR
McKinnon, S
Chapel, GD
Shaneman, M
Portigal, L
Eeglon, T
Morgan, JR
Forestburg Collieries Limited
Parr, R
Morris, JE
Engler, RF
Robbins, GH
Haddock, JK
Bowman, PM
McAllister, RE
Electric Utilities Planning Council (EUPC)
Ferguson, T
Chorel, MJ
Reed, WA
Beckett, WJ
Fleury, D
Shinyei, F
Hosie, W
Desarkar, A
Calgary Power Ltd.
Sabey, DO
Kay, HM
Fraser, WL
Barry, EJ
Scheaffer, HG
Crowe, TW
Friend, A
Williams, MM
City of Edmonton
Smith, P
Kyte, EF
Department of Municipal Affairs Special Areas Board
Duff, AR
Unifarm Region Eleven
Gordon, H
Williams, CK
Price, RH
Anderson, D
Brown, V
Cambell, C
Hutton, LC
Bull Pound Breeders' Co-operative Ltd.
Lenfesty, Ma
McEwen, MO
Hartzler, C
T.G. Cattle Company Limited
Gateman, J
Cattle, TG
Department of Environment staff
Defir, J
Harrington, DG
Lupul, S
Deagle, C
Edmonton Power
Patterson, M
Pettican, A
Sadesky, A
Keller, A
Warren, K
Pelletier, D
Prostebby, J
Clark, D
De, M
Visman, J
Gilchrist, G
Majury, A
Stutz, C
Croft, B
Lamb, A
Gill, D
Stewart, R
MacDougall, T
Dusel, F
Brocke, L
Reeves, B
Warburg and District Chamber of Commerce
Siega, L
Village of Warburg
Zotzman, E
Town of Drayton Valley
Welsh, MC
McKay, A
McKay, R
Osbak, E
Save-Tomorrow-Oppose Pollution (S.T.O.P.)
Poulin, J
Paschen, J
Royen, L
McGaffey, P
Wighton, D
Town of Hanna
Dookie, SS
Sierra Club of Alberta
Kariel, P
Genesee Agricultural Protection Society (G.A.P.S.)
Skermer, R
Liba, Z
Koebernick, W
Mertz, W
Koebernick, E
Liba, L
Group of Concerned Genesee and Area Citizens
Lorincz, S
Fritz, C
Lawrence, KC
Unifarm
Falconberg, H
Bell, S
Smith, R
County of Leduc
Warburg Coal Company
Christian Farmers Federation
Vanderschaaf, Mr
Less detail

Decision 80-26

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2013
Applicant
Chieftain Development Company Ltd.
Application Number
790487
Title
Decision on application by Chieftain Development Co. Ltd., 1980 (gas processing plant - Hythe-Brainard area)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Chieftain Development Co. Ltd., 1980 (gas processing plant - Hythe-Brainard area)
Date
1980
Applicant
Chieftain Development Company Ltd.
Application Number
790487
Hearing Panel
Webber HJ
Bellows LA
Lupul SL
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Grande Prairie area
Sour gas
Air quality
Amine
Claus process
Emission
Environmental impact
Gas processing
Locating
Plant design
Procedure
Sulphur recovery
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act
Notes
Decision 80-26 with Examiners report attached on application No. 790487 to construct a gas processing plant about 19 km northwest of Hythe to process natural gas (75% of which would be sour gas) (TP.74, R.12, W6M); Examiners hearing 1980-07-22 adjourned to 1980-08-14/15/20/21/22
Interveners
Alberta Women's Institutes, Ray Lake Branch
Barnes, E.T.
Blum, J.
Callihoo, R.
Callihoo, G.
Elvestad, L.
Elvestad, R.
Epp, E.
Fischer, G.W.
Gibson, A.O.
Harpe, A.
Harpe, O.
Harpe, T
Harpe, R.
Horse Lake Indian Band
Johnstone, A.
La Glace and District Petitioners
Loberg, G.
Loberg, E.
Lumbis, K.
McAllister, Y.
The Peace Country Acid Soils Committee
Regional Petitioners
Tiesenhausen, I.
Tiesenhausen, N.
Tiesenhausen, R.
The Trumpeter Swan Society
The Valhalla Save Our Soils
The Village of Hythe
Less detail

Decision 87-06

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision221
Applicant
Sulpetro Limited
Application Number
850272
Title
Decision on application by Sulpetro Limited, 1987 (increased throughput and ethane recovery Wapiti gas plant)
Date
1987
Title
Decision on application by Sulpetro Limited, 1987 (increased throughput and ethane recovery Wapiti gas plant)
Date
1987
Applicant
Sulpetro Limited
Application Number
850272
Hearing Panel
Goodman CJ
Mink FJ
Morin EJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Elmworth field
Ethane
Gas processing plant
Wapiti field
Benefit cost analysis
Demand (economics)
Design criteria
Economic analysis
NTS 83L
Plant design
Supply (economics)
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S9.020
Notes
Decision D87-6 on application No. 850272 to extract ethane- plus from the natural gas processed at the Wapiti gas plant in LSD 4-8-69-8 W6M; Board hearing 1987-01-27/28/29/30 and 1987-02-05/06; see related documents Memorandum of Decision on this application released 1987-01-20 and earlier Decision ERCB report 82-G on part I application
Interveners
Dow Chemical Canada Inc.
Union Carbide Ethylene Oxide/Glycol Company
C-I-L Inc.
Novacor Chemicals Ltd.
Celanese Canada Inc.
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
Dome Petroleum Limited
Esso Resources Canada Limited
Gulf Canada Corporation
Scurry-Rainbow Oil Limited
Location
04-08-069-08W6
Less detail

Decision 87-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision218
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
861525
870045
870046
870047
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Limited, 1987 (approval of the transportation and processing of high hydrogen sulphide sour gas reserves in the Caroline field and area, Bearberry demonstration project)
Date
1987
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Limited, 1987 (approval of the transportation and processing of high hydrogen sulphide sour gas reserves in the Caroline field and area, Bearberry demonstration project)
Date
1987
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
861525
870045
870046
870047
Hearing Panel
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Fox EG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Caroline field
Caroline gas project
Gas pipeline
Gas processing plant
Gathering line
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Sulphur
Sulphur recovery
Community relations
Design criteria
Emission
Environmental impact
IL-80-24
Locating
NTS 82O
Phase behavior
Pilot scale
Plant design
Safety
Sulphur content
Transportation system
Truck
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S15.050
Notes
Decision D87-8 on application No. 861525, 870045, 870046, and 870047 for a demonstration project to improve sulfur recovery; the project is to last five years and is designed to establish the technical and economic feasibility of commercial development.
Interveners
Bauman, L.
Bauman, J.
Newsham, C.
Less detail

Decision 90-A

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision126
Applicant
Canadian Hydro Developers Inc.
Independent Producer Power Inc.
Dickson Power Ltd.
Special Areas Board
Application Number
881550
881838
881989
890529
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Hydro Developers Inc., Independent Producer Power Inc., Dickson Power Ltd., and Special Areas Board, 1990 (on competing applications to install a small hydro power plant at the Dickson Dam)
Date
1990
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Hydro Developers Inc., Independent Producer Power Inc., Dickson Power Ltd., and Special Areas Board, 1990 (on competing applications to install a small hydro power plant at the Dickson Dam)
Date
1990
Applicant
Canadian Hydro Developers Inc.
Independent Producer Power Inc.
Dickson Power Ltd.
Special Areas Board
Application Number
881550
881838
881989
890529
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Mink FJ
Prince JP
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Electric power
Descriptors
Dickson dam
Electric power project
Hydroelectric power generation
Non-utility generation
Benefit cost analysis
Capacity
Cost analysis
Economic analysis
Plant design
River flow
NTS 83B
Power system interconnection
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
Special Areas Act
Notes
Decision D90-A on application No. 882550 (Canadian hydro), No. 881838 (Independent producer power), No. 881989 (Dickson power Ltd) and No. 890529 (special areas Board) competing to install a small hydro power plant at the Dickson Dam; Board hearing held 1989-06-20/21/27/29
Less detail

Decision E77-(p.176)

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1917
Applicant
Mobil Oil Canada Ltd.
Application Number
770253
Title
Examiners report on application by Mobil Oil Canada Ltd., 1977 (gas processing Duhamel field)
Date
1977
Title
Examiners report on application by Mobil Oil Canada Ltd., 1977 (gas processing Duhamel field)
Date
1977
Applicant
Mobil Oil Canada Ltd.
Application Number
770253
Hearing Panel
Webber HJ
Bray JA
Brushett ER
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Duhamel field
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Automatic control
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 83A
Plant design
Safety
Sulphur dioxide
Notes
ERCB Examiners report on application No. 770253 to construct a gas processing plant in LSD 3-32-45-21 W4M in the DUHAMEL field; approval No. 2573
Interveners
Group of 24 area residents
Less detail

9 records – page 1 of 1.