566 records – page 1 of 29.

Application 1043597

https://had.aer.ca/link/application43826
Applicant
Suncor Energy Inc.
Summary
Requesting to change the substance of the southern portion of its 406.4 mm outside diameter existing OSPL line to include the transportation of high vapour pressure products, between the station isolation valve on the discharge side if the Scotford pump station located 15-29-55-21W4.
Applicant
Suncor Energy Inc.
Summary
Requesting to change the substance of the southern portion of its 406.4 mm outside diameter existing OSPL line to include the transportation of high vapour pressure products, between the station isolation valve on the discharge side if the Scotford pump station located 15-29-55-21W4.
Category
Resources Applications
Descriptors
Oils Sands Pipeline
Vapour Pressure Products
Area
Scotford
Hearing Location
Best Western Fort Inn & Suite Hotel, 10115-88 Avenue, Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta, 9:00am
Less detail

Decision 53-UNNUMBERED (53-11-24)

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2407
Applicant
Canadian Montana Pipe Line Company
Trans-Canada Pipe Lines Limited
Trans-Canada Grid of Alberta Ltd.
Canadian Delhi Oil Ltd.
Western Pipe Lines
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Montana Pipe Line Company, Trans-Canada Pipe Lines Limited, Trans-Canada Grid of Alberta Ltd., Canadian Delhi Oil Ltd. and Western Pipe Lines, 1953 (gas removal)
Date
1953
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Montana Pipe Line Company, Trans-Canada Pipe Lines Limited, Trans-Canada Grid of Alberta Ltd., Canadian Delhi Oil Ltd. and Western Pipe Lines, 1953 (gas removal)
Date
1953
Applicant
Canadian Montana Pipe Line Company
Trans-Canada Pipe Lines Limited
Trans-Canada Grid of Alberta Ltd.
Canadian Delhi Oil Ltd.
Western Pipe Lines
Hearing Panel
McKinnon IN
Goodall DP
Govier GW
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas removal
Descriptors
Gas removal
Trunk pipeline
Alberta
Gas demand
Gas reserve
Gas supply
Legal References
Gas Resources Preservation Act 1949
Notes
Decision - unnumbered (issued 1953-11-24) on applications for gas removal under the Gas Resources Preservation Act by various companies ; Application or hearing numbers and hearing dates not identified
Less detail

Decision 60-07

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2422
Applicant
Bailey Selburn Oil and Gas Ltd.
B-H Petroleums (Alberta) Ltd.
California Standard Company
Charter Oil and Gas Ltd.
Crowfoot Exploration Ltd.
Selbay Exploration Ltd.
Consolidated Mic Mac Oils Ltd.
Mayfair Oil and Gas Ltd.
Richfield Oil Corporation
Application Number
000378
000240
Title
Decision on application by Bailey Selburn Oil and Gas Ltd., B-H Petroleums (Alberta) Ltd., California Standard Company, Charter Oil and Gas Ltd., Crowfoot Exploration Ltd., Selbay Exploration Ltd., J. Merril Wright, Jr., and Consolidated Mic Mac Oils Ltd., Mayfair Oil and Gas Ltd., and Richfield Oil Corporation, 1960 (gas removal)
Date
1960
Title
Decision on application by Bailey Selburn Oil and Gas Ltd., B-H Petroleums (Alberta) Ltd., California Standard Company, Charter Oil and Gas Ltd., Crowfoot Exploration Ltd., Selbay Exploration Ltd., J. Merril Wright, Jr., and Consolidated Mic Mac Oils Ltd., Mayfair Oil and Gas Ltd., and Richfield Oil Corporation, 1960 (gas removal)
Date
1960
Applicant
Bailey Selburn Oil and Gas Ltd.
B-H Petroleums (Alberta) Ltd.
California Standard Company
Charter Oil and Gas Ltd.
Crowfoot Exploration Ltd.
Selbay Exploration Ltd.
Consolidated Mic Mac Oils Ltd.
Mayfair Oil and Gas Ltd.
Richfield Oil Corporation
Application Number
000378
000240
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Manyluk AF
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas removal
Descriptors
Gas removal
Alberta
Etzikom field
Gas pipeline
Gas reserve
Lease drainage
Medicine Hat field
NTS 72E
NTS 72L
Legal References
Gas Resources Preservation Act 1956
Notes
ERCB Report 60-7 on application no. 378 by Bailey Selburn et al to remove gas produced from the Medicine Hat Field over a 25-year period (Board Hearing 1960-08-22/23) and on application no. 240 by Consolidated Mic Mac Oils et al to remove gas produced from the Medicine Hat Field over a 25-year period (Board hearing 1960-08-23)
Less detail

Decision 61 UNNUMBERED-61-06

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2424
Applicant
Britamoil Pipe Line Company Limited
Westalta Products Pipe Line Ltd.
Provincial Products Pipelines Limited
Hydrocarbons Pipeline Limited
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Royalite Oil Company Limited
Application Number
87
90
91
174
304
396
Title
Decision on application by Britamoil Pipe Line Company Limited, Westalta Products Pipe Line Ltd., Provincial Products Pipelines Limited, Hydrocarbons Pipeline Limited, Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Royalite Oil Company Limited, 1961 (to construct a pipeline) (report to the Minister of Mines and Minerals)
Date
1961
Title
Decision on application by Britamoil Pipe Line Company Limited, Westalta Products Pipe Line Ltd., Provincial Products Pipelines Limited, Hydrocarbons Pipeline Limited, Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Royalite Oil Company Limited, 1961 (to construct a pipeline) (report to the Minister of Mines and Minerals)
Date
1961
Applicant
Britamoil Pipe Line Company Limited
Westalta Products Pipe Line Ltd.
Provincial Products Pipelines Limited
Hydrocarbons Pipeline Limited
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Royalite Oil Company Limited
Application Number
87
90
91
174
304
396
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Manyluk AF
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Pipeline
Alberta
Butane
Gas demand
Gas reserve
Gas supply
Propane
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
ERCB Report 61-Unnumbered (Issued June 1961) on Applications No. 90 & 91 by Britamoil, Application No. 87 by Westalta, Hearing No. 176 by Provincial Products and Hydrocarbons Pipeline, Application No. 174 by Hydrocarbons Pipeline, Application No. 304 (Hearing 182) by HBOG and Application No. 396 by Royalite; Board Hearing May 30-31, June 11 and 13-16 and October 4, 1960 for Westalta; July 18-20, 1960 for Britamoil; September 20-23, 1960 for Provincial Products and Hydrocarbons Pipeline Limited; December 13-14, 1960 for Hudson's Bay; and May 2, 1961 for Royalite Oil Company, Limited.
Less detail

Decision 68-14

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2297
Applicant
Alberta Natural Gas Company
Application Number
4048
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Natural Gas Company, 1968 (processing plant on foothills division of the Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited system)
Date
1968
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Natural Gas Company, 1968 (processing plant on foothills division of the Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited system)
Date
1968
Applicant
Alberta Natural Gas Company
Application Number
4048
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Manyluk AF
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Gas processing
NOVA pipeline system
Notes
Decision on application for approval of a scheme for the processing and disposal of gas flowing through the Foothills division of the Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Ltd
Application granted approval no. 1075
Interveners
The Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Pan American Canada Oil Company Ltd.
Jefferson Lake Petrochemicals of Canada Ltd.
Village of Cochrane
Certain Residents from the vicinity of the proposed plant
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision 69-13

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2265
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Trans-Canada Grid of Alberta Ltd.
Application Number
4583
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited and Trans-Canada Grid of Alberta Ltd., 1969 (Processing plant on plains division of the Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited system)
Date
1969
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited and Trans-Canada Grid of Alberta Ltd., 1969 (Processing plant on plains division of the Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited system)
Date
1969
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Trans-Canada Grid of Alberta Ltd.
Application Number
4583
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Manyluk AF
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Gas processing
Ethane
NOVA pipeline system
Notes
Decision on application for approval of a scheme for the processing and disposal of gas flowing through the plains division pipe line of the Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Interveners
The Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Less detail

Decision 72-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2220
Applicant
McCulloch Gas Processing (Alberta) Ltd.
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Application Number
6145
6146
Title
Decision on application by McCulloch Gas Processing (Alberta) Ltd. and Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited, 1972 (applications for permit to construct a gas pipe line in the Wainwright Chauvin area)
Date
1972
Title
Decision on application by McCulloch Gas Processing (Alberta) Ltd. and Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited, 1972 (applications for permit to construct a gas pipe line in the Wainwright Chauvin area)
Date
1972
Applicant
McCulloch Gas Processing (Alberta) Ltd.
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Application Number
6145
6146
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Millard V
Craig DR
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Notes
Decision 72-2 on application No. 6145 by McCulloch and on application No. 6146 by AGTL to gather and transport natural gas from Wainwright Chauvin area to AGTL facilities; application No. 6145 by McCulloch denied; No. 6146 by AGTL granted by permit No. 12949; Board hearing 1972-02-03/04
Interveners
Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd.
BPOG Operations Ltd.
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Norse Explorations Ltd.
Provident Resources Management Ltd.
Trans-Canada Pipe Lines Limited
Village of Chauvin
Village of Edgerton
Municipal District of Provost No. 52
Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
Region #7Unifarm
Town of Wainwright
Municipal District of Wainwright No. 61
Approval
Approved (partial)
Denied (partial)
Less detail

Decision 74-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2187
Applicant
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Application Number
7254
Title
Decision on application by Northwestern Utilities Limited, 1974 (application for permit to construct a gas pipe line from Homeglen-Rimbey area to Bonnie Glen area)
Date
1974
Title
Decision on application by Northwestern Utilities Limited, 1974 (application for permit to construct a gas pipe line from Homeglen-Rimbey area to Bonnie Glen area)
Date
1974
Applicant
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Application Number
7254
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Bonnie Glen field
Gas pipeline
Homeglen-Rimbey field
Pipeline construction permit
NTS 83B
NTS 83H
Legal References
Pipeline Act Part 2
Notes
Decision 74-1 on application No. 7254 to construct a gas line for the transmission of natural gas from Homeglen-Rimbey area to Bonnie Glen area; permit No. 15021
Interveners
The Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd.
TransCanada Pipelines Limited
The City of Edmonton
Less detail

Decision 74-10

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2180
Applicant
Imperial Oil Limited
Application Number
7887
Title
Decision on application by Imperial Oil Limited, 1974 (transmission of sour natural gas in 6-inch pipeline from the Jumping Pound west field to the Quirk Creek Gas Plant)
Date
1974
Title
Decision on application by Imperial Oil Limited, 1974 (transmission of sour natural gas in 6-inch pipeline from the Jumping Pound west field to the Quirk Creek Gas Plant)
Date
1974
Applicant
Imperial Oil Limited
Application Number
7887
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
Berkowitz N
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Jumping Pound west field
Sour gas
Environmental impact
Hydrogen sulphide
Safety
Notes
Decision 74-10 on application No. 7887 to construct about 33 mile long 6-inch pipeline for transmission of sour natural gas from well "IOE Jumpw 11-16-25-6 W5" to Quirk Creek gas plant; Board hearing 1974-08-08/09; application dismissed
Interveners
The Sarcee Indian Band
Sarcee Developments Ltd.
Copithorne, K.F.
The Department of Indian Affairs
City of Calgary
Less detail

Decision 75-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2175
Applicant
Great Plains Development Company of Canada Ltd.
Application Number
7976
Title
Decision on application by Great Plains Development Company Of Canada Ltd., 1975 (declaration f the Candel Minnehik-Buck Lake gas plant as a common processor and of the Minnehik-Buck Lake gathering system as a common carrier)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Great Plains Development Company Of Canada Ltd., 1975 (declaration f the Candel Minnehik-Buck Lake gas plant as a common processor and of the Minnehik-Buck Lake gathering system as a common carrier)
Date
1975
Applicant
Great Plains Development Company of Canada Ltd.
Application Number
7976
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Craig DR
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Common carrier
Common processor
Descriptors
Common carrier
Common processor
Minnehik-Buck Lake field
Capacity
Cost analysis
Economic analysis
Gas pipeline
Gas producing
Lease drainage
NTS 83B
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S49
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S54
Notes
Decision 75-3 on application No. 7976 to declare the Candel Minnehik-Buck Lake gas plant as a common processor and the Minnehik-Buck Lake gathering system as common carrier; Order No. Misc 7505
Interveners
CanDel Oil
Less detail

Decision 75-13

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2166
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
8597
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited and Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1975 (For permit to construct an oil line for the transmission of propane butanes and pentanes plus from the Candel Minnehik-Buck Lake gas plant)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited and Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1975 (For permit to construct an oil line for the transmission of propane butanes and pentanes plus from the Candel Minnehik-Buck Lake gas plant)
Date
1975
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
8597
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Butane
Liquefied natural gas
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Pentanes plus
Propane
Environmental impact
Legal References
Pipeline Act Part 2
Notes
Decision 75-13 on application No. 8597 to construct an oil pipeline to transport propane, butanes and pentanes plus from the Candel Minnehik-Buck Lake gas plant to the existing Cochrane to Edmonton pipeline; Board hearing 1975-08-28; adjourned to 1975-09-09
Interveners
CanDel Oil Ltd.
Goliad Oil & Gas Company
Pembina Pipe Line Ltd.
M.L.A. for Drayton Valley
Less detail

Decision 75-14

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2165
Applicant
Mobil Oil Canada Ltd.
Application Number
8547
Title
Decision on application by Mobil Oil Canada Ltd., 1975 (rateable take of gas from the Ricinus D-3A pool and declaration of the gathering line from Ricinus D-3A pool to the Ram River gas plant and the fuel gas line from the Ricinus gas plant to the Ricinus D-3A pool as common carriers)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Mobil Oil Canada Ltd., 1975 (rateable take of gas from the Ricinus D-3A pool and declaration of the gathering line from Ricinus D-3A pool to the Ram River gas plant and the fuel gas line from the Ricinus gas plant to the Ricinus D-3A pool as common carriers)
Date
1975
Applicant
Mobil Oil Canada Ltd.
Application Number
8547
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Rateable take
Common carrier
Descriptors
Common carrier
Rateable take of gas
Ricinus field
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas producing
Gathering line
NTS 83B
Unit operation
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S35
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S49
Notes
Decision 75-14 on application No. 8547 for rateable take of gas from the Ricinus D-3A pool and for the declaration of the gathering line from the pool to the Ram River gas plant and the fuel gas line from the plant to the pool as common carrier.
Interveners
Pacific Petroleums Ltd.
Chevron Standard Limited
Consolidated Natural Gas Liimited
Gulf Oil Canada Limited
Less detail

Decision 76-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2161
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Application Number
8908
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited, 1976 (gas line - Ferintosh area)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited, 1976 (gas line - Ferintosh area)
Date
1976
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Application Number
8908
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Berkowitz N
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Ferintosh field
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
NTS 83A
Notes
Decision 76-1 on application No. 8908 to construct a pipeline to transport gas from its Ferintosh meter station to the Wood River meter station.
Interveners
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
Less detail

Decision 76-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2156
Applicant
North Canadian Oils Limited
Application Number
9164
Title
Decision on application by North Canadian Oils Limited, 1976 (gas pipeline Wabamun Lake area)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by North Canadian Oils Limited, 1976 (gas pipeline Wabamun Lake area)
Date
1976
Applicant
North Canadian Oils Limited
Application Number
9164
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Berkowitz N
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Gas supply
Pipeline construction permit
Industrial plant
Natural gas - fuel
Notes
Decision 76-8 on application No. 9164 to construct a secondary line to transmit natural gas from the north Canadian line in section 18-53-6 W5M to the Langley peat plant (in section 7-52-6 W5M).
Interveners
Langley Peat Ltd.
Evergreen Gas Co-op Ltd.
The Federation of Alberta Gas Co-ops Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 76-10

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2154
Applicant
Mobil Oil Canada Ltd.
Application Number
9406
Title
Decision on application by Mobil Oil Canada Ltd., 1976 (Ccommon carrier Ricinus D-3A pool)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Mobil Oil Canada Ltd., 1976 (Ccommon carrier Ricinus D-3A pool)
Date
1976
Applicant
Mobil Oil Canada Ltd.
Application Number
9406
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
Macleod NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Common carrier
Descriptors
Common carrier
Ricinus field
Gas pipeline
Unit operation
Notes
Decision 76-10 on application No. 9406 to rescind Order No. Misc 7511 which declared the owner of the secondary gas pipeline from the Recinus D-3A pool to the Aquitaine Ram River gas plant to be a common carrier.
Interveners
Pacific Petroleum Ltd.
Chevron Standard Limited
Less detail

Decision 76-11

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2153
Applicant
Alberta Oil Sands Pipeline Ltd.
Application Number
9138
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Oil Sands Pipeline Ltd., 1976 (oil line from Fort McMurray to Edmonton)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Oil Sands Pipeline Ltd., 1976 (oil line from Fort McMurray to Edmonton)
Date
1976
Applicant
Alberta Oil Sands Pipeline Ltd.
Application Number
9138
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Berkowitz N
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Fort McMurray area
Manufactured crude oil
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Mildred Lake project
NTS 74D
NTS 83H
NTS 83I
NTS 83P
Pipeline route
Route selection
Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Transportation corridor
Legal References
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
Decision 76-11 on application No. 9138 to construct an oil line to transport synthetic crude from Syncrude's Mildred Lake plant to the interprovincial pipeline terminal in Edmonton.
Interveners
Albersun Pipeline Ltd.
CU Engineering Limited
Less detail

Decision 76-12

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2152
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Application Number
9162
9219
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited, 1976 (Edson and Foothills extensions)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited, 1976 (Edson and Foothills extensions)
Date
1976
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Application Number
9162
9219
Hearing Panel
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Edson area
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
NTS 83F
NTS 83K
NTS 83M
NTS 83N
Pipeline crossing
River
Water pollution
Notes
Decision 76-12 on application No. 9162 (Edson extension) and No. 9219 (Foothills extension) to construct pipelines for the transmission of natural gas; Board hearing 1976-06-17/18/21; see also final Decision 77-07
Less detail

Decision 76-14

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2150
Applicant
CU Engineering Limited
Application Number
9446
Title
Decision on application by CU Engineering Limited, 1976 (gas line from Atmore to the Fort McMurray area)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by CU Engineering Limited, 1976 (gas line from Atmore to the Fort McMurray area)
Date
1976
Applicant
CU Engineering Limited
Application Number
9446
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fort McMurray area
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 74D
NTS 83P
Notes
Decision 76-14 on application No. 9446 to construct a pipeline to transport natural gas from a point near Atmore (section 32-67-17 W4M) to a point near Syncrude's Mildred Lake extraction plant (in section 7-93-10 W4M) for use as fuel.
Interveners
Albersun Pipeline Ltd.
Alberta Oil Sands Pipeline Ltd.
The Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
TransCanada PipeLines Limited
Simmons Pipelines Limited
Native Outreach
Less detail

Decision 76-15

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2149
Applicant
Texasgulf Inc.
Application Number
9183
9184
Title
Decision on application by Texasgulf Inc., 1976 (secondary lines for transmission of fuel gas and sour gas Okotoks area)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Texasgulf Inc., 1976 (secondary lines for transmission of fuel gas and sour gas Okotoks area)
Date
1976
Applicant
Texasgulf Inc.
Application Number
9183
9184
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Bohme VE
Macleod NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Okotoks field
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Hydrogen sulphide
Land use
Land value
NTS 82I
Pipeline accident
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S29
Energy Resources Conservation Act S34
Notes
Decision 76-15 on application No. 9183 to construct a secondary line to transport fuel gas from LSD 10-31-20-28 W4M to LSD 11-20-20-28 W4M and on application No. 9184 for a line to transport sour gas from LSD 11-20-20-28 W4M to the Okotoks gas plant (in LSD 14-36-20-29 W4M).
Interveners
Leduc, A.S.
Long, K.
Municipal District of Foothills
Rio Frio Ranch Ltd.
Sheep Creek Developments Limited
Less detail

Decision 77-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2147
Applicant
General Crude Oil Company Northern
Application Number
9414
9415
9840
Title
Decision on application by General Crude Oil Company Northern, 1977 (gas processing and pipeline construction Teepee Creek-Sexsmith areas)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by General Crude Oil Company Northern, 1977 (gas processing and pipeline construction Teepee Creek-Sexsmith areas)
Date
1977
Applicant
General Crude Oil Company Northern
Application Number
9414
9415
9840
Hearing Panel
Webber HJ
Bellows LA
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Teepee field
Air quality
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Gas flaring
Monitoring
NTS 83M
Socio-economic effect
Safety
Sulphur dioxide
Notes
Decision 77-1 on application No. 9414, No. 9415 and No. 9840 to construct a sour gas plant in section 2-74-4 W6M and to construct secondary lines to transport sour gas from points in LSD 10-21-73-3 W6M and LSD 6-26-73-4 W6M to the plant site and to construct a secondary line to transport sour gas from a point in LSD 10-12-74-6 W6M to the plant site.
Interveners
Peace River Regional Planning
County of Grande Prairie
Smith, D.
Hollingworth, N.
Less detail

566 records – page 1 of 29.