16 records – page 1 of 1.

Decision 70-C

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2493
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Transcanada Gasproducts Ltd.
Application Number
5143
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited and Transcanada Gasproducts Ltd., 1970 (Propane removal under Gas Resources Preservation Act, 1956)
Date
1970
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited and Transcanada Gasproducts Ltd., 1970 (Propane removal under Gas Resources Preservation Act, 1956)
Date
1970
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Transcanada Gasproducts Ltd.
Application Number
5143
Hearing Panel
Manyluk AF
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Propane removal
Descriptors
Propane removal
Gas removal
Alberta
Demand (economics)
Petrochemical industry
Propane
Reserve
Legal References
Gas Resources Preservation Act, 1956
Notes
ERCB report 70-C on application No. 5143 to amend permit DP 69-2 to increase the volume of propane that may be removed from the province; granted by approval 1153A; see also related report ERCB 69-E
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision 75-F

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2362
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Alberta Ammonia Limited
Application Number
8009
7907
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1975 (ammonia plant near Brooks) and Decision on application by Alberta Ammonia Ltd., 1975 (ammonia plant near Raymond)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1975 (ammonia plant near Brooks) and Decision on application by Alberta Ammonia Ltd., 1975 (ammonia plant near Raymond)
Date
1975
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Alberta Ammonia Limited
Application Number
8009
7907
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Ammonia
Brooks area
Chemical plant
Fertilizer
Industrial development permit
Petrochemical industry
Raymond area
Alberta
Benefit cost analysis
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Fuel consumption
Gas consumption
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 72L
NTS 82H
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 75-F on application No. 8009 (Alberta ammonia) to use gas as raw material and fuel to produce anhydrous ammonia in plant near Raymond (request for Order-in-Council withdrawn) and on application No. 7907 (PanCanadian) to use gas as raw material and fuel to produce anhydrous ammonia in plant near Brooks (application withdrawn); Board hearing 1974-09-30, 1974-10-01/02/16; see also ERCB report 75-FA for supplementary information.
Less detail

Decision 75-FA

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2361
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Alberta Ammonia Limited
Application Number
8009
7907
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1975 (ammonia plant Decision on application by Alberta Ammonia Ltd. (ammonia plant near Raymond) (section 42 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1975 (ammonia plant Decision on application by Alberta Ammonia Ltd. (ammonia plant near Raymond) (section 42 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act)
Date
1975
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Alberta Ammonia Limited
Application Number
8009
7907
Hearing Panel
N/A
Hearing Type
N/A
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Ammonia
Brooks area
Chemical plant
Fertilizer
Industrial development permit
Petrochemical industry
Raymond area
Alberta
Benefit cost analysis
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Fuel consumption
Gas consumption
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 72L
NTS 82H
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 75-FA supplementing ERCB report 75-F
Less detail

Decision 75-G

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2360
Applicant
Canadian Fertilizers Limited
Application Number
8162
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Fertilizers Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Section 42 for ammonia plant at Medicine Hat)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Fertilizers Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Section 42 for ammonia plant at Medicine Hat)
Date
1975
Applicant
Canadian Fertilizers Limited
Application Number
8162
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Ammonia
Chemical plant
Fertilizer
Industrial development permit
Medicine Hat area
Petrochemical industry
Urea
Alberta
Benefit cost analysis
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
ERCB 75-F
ID-74-01
Fuel consumption
Gas consumption
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 72L
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 75-G on application No. 8162 to use gas as a raw material and fuel to produce ammonia in plant at Medicine Hat (section 14-13-6 W4); Board hearing 1974-12-16/17/18; permit No. CFL 75-1
Less detail

Decision 78-F

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2349
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
770861
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1978 (Removal of ethane under the Gas Resources Preservation Act)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1978 (Removal of ethane under the Gas Resources Preservation Act)
Date
1978
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
770861
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Ethane
Descriptors
Ethane
Gas removal
Availability
Demand (economics)
Gas demand
Gas reserve
Gas supply
Petrochemical industry
Price
Raw material
Supply (economics)
Surplus
Legal References
Gas Resources Preservation Act S4
Notes
ERCB Report 78-F on application no. 770861 for a permit to remove ethane from the province via Cochin Pipeline to be delivered to Columbia LNG Corp. in Green Springs, Ohio; Board hearing 1977-12-22/23; Permit no. DP 78-2
Less detail

Decision 82-11

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2067
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
810417
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1982 (proposed deep-cut facilities Judy Creek area gas processing plants)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1982 (proposed deep-cut facilities Judy Creek area gas processing plants)
Date
1982
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
810417
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
DeSorcy GJ
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Ethane
Gas processing plant
Judy Creek field
Sour gas
Benefit cost analysis
Capitalized cost
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Energy development
Expansion
Gas conservation
Liquefied natural gas
Marketing
NTS 83J
Petrochemical industry
Raw material
Supply (economics)
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision on application to modify existing Judy Creek gas conservation plant located in LSD 15-25-64-11 W5M to extract a mixture of ethane and heavier hydrocarbons (ethane plus from the processed gas)
Interveners
Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd.
Alberta Natural Gas Company Ltd.
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
Chevron Standard Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Shell Canada Chemical Company
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Esso Chemical Company
Hudbay Chemical Company
Alberta Ethane/Ethylene Petrochemical Project
C-I-L-Inc.
Trimac Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
CU Ethane Limited
Less detail

Decision 82-27

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2051
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Chevron Standard Limited
Application Number
810916
811009
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited and Chevron Standard Limited, 1982 (Propane extraction plant and fractionation plant fort Saskatchewan)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited and Chevron Standard Limited, 1982 (Propane extraction plant and fractionation plant fort Saskatchewan)
Date
1982
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Chevron Standard Limited
Application Number
810916
811009
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Goodman CJ
Warne GA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Fort Saskatchewan field
Fractionation
Gas processing plant
Liquefied natural gas
Butane
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Ethane
Expansion
Gas storage
NTS 83H
Pentanes plus
Petrochemical industry
Propane
Raw material
Storage facility
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision 82-27 on application No. 810916 by Dome for fractionating NGL at its existing cavern storage facilities and on No. 811009 by Chevron to expand its existing fractionation facilities (TP.55, R.22, W4M).
Interveners
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Esso Chemical Company
Hudson's Bay Chemical Company Ltd.
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Alberta Natural Gas Company Ltd.
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Esso Resources Canada Ltd.
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Petro-Canada Exploration Inc.
Sulpetro Limited
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 82-32

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2047
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
810998
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1982 (Expansion of Empress gas reprocessing facilities)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1982 (Expansion of Empress gas reprocessing facilities)
Date
1982
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
810998
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Goodman CJ
Warne GA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Empress field
Ethane
Benefit cost analysis
Economic analysis
Marketing
NTS 72L
Petrochemical industry
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision 82-32 on application No. 810998 to expand Empress straddle plant (section 12-20-1 W4M) to reprocess natural gas to recover a mixture of ethane, propane and heavier hydrocarbons; Board hearing 1982-04-13/14/15
Interveners
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Alberta Natural Gas Company Limited
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Atcor Resources Limited
Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
Chevron Standard Limited
Esso Resources Canada Ltd.
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Northwestern Utilities Limited
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Petro-Canada Exploration Inc.
ProGas Limited
Sulpetro Limited
TransCanada PipeLines Limited
Less detail

Decision 82-G

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2464
Applicant
Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
Sulpetro Limited
Chevron Standard Limited
Application Number
820323
820354
820101
Title
Gas processing plant expansions Decision on application by Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd., 1982 (gas plant expansion, Elmworth field); Decision on application by Sulpetro Limited, 1982 (gas plant expansion, Wapiti, Elmworth area); Decision on application by Chevron Standard Limited, 1982 (gas plant expansion, Kaybob south field)
Date
1982
Title
Gas processing plant expansions Decision on application by Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd., 1982 (gas plant expansion, Elmworth field); Decision on application by Sulpetro Limited, 1982 (gas plant expansion, Wapiti, Elmworth area); Decision on application by Chevron Standard Limited, 1982 (gas plant expansion, Kaybob south field)
Date
1982
Applicant
Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
Sulpetro Limited
Chevron Standard Limited
Application Number
820323
820354
820101
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Elmworth field
Ethane
Gas processing plant
Kaybob South field
Wapiti field
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Energy development
Enhanced recovery scheme
Expansion
Forecasting
Liquefied natural gas
Marketing
Miscible displacement
NTS 83K
NTS 83L
NTS 83M
Petrochemical industry
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
paper copy missing as of December 2006, see scanned copy in Hummingbird (Document Number 442451)
2 volumes (main report and supplement released 1983-08-15)
Report on application no. 820323 by Canadian Hunter to expand raw gas inlet capacity and extract a mixture of ethane and heavier hydrocarbons (ethane-plus) from gas processed at its Elmworth gas plant located in section 8-70-11 W6M and application no. 820354 by Sulpetro to extract ethane-plus at its Wapiti gas plant in LSD 4-8-69-8 W6M and on application no. 820101 by Chevron to extract ethane-plus at the Kaybob south Beaverhill Lake unit no. 3 plant located in section 15-59-18 W5M
Board hearing 1982-06-15/16/17/18/21/22/23
See related decision D87-6 for decision on part 2 application by Sulpetro
Less detail

Decision 83-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2392
Applicant
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Application Number
820934
820935
Title
Decision on application by Union Carbide Canada Limited, 1983 (applications for permits to construct ethylene glycol pipelines from Prentiss to Blackfalds)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Union Carbide Canada Limited, 1983 (applications for permits to construct ethylene glycol pipelines from Prentiss to Blackfalds)
Date
1983
Applicant
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Application Number
820934
820935
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Blackfalds area
Ethylene glycol
Pipeline construction permit
Prentiss area
Product pipeline
Agricultural land
Environmental impact
Land reclamation
Locating
NTS 83A
Petrochemical industry
Pipeline route
Railroad
Route selection
Safety
Socio-economic effect
Terminal facility
Transportation cost
Legal References
Pipeline Regulation S2
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision No. D83-3 on application No. 820934 to construct 18.5 km of 114.3 MM outside diameter stainless steel pipeline for transmission of polyester grade ethylene glycol from plant in LSD 14-30-39-25 W4M to proposed Blackfalds railcar loading terminal in LSD 11-26-39-27 W4M and on application No. 820935 to construct 18.5 km of 168.3 MM outside diameter carbon steel pipeline to transmit antifreeze grade ethylene glycol from plant to terminal; Board hearing 1983-02-15/16
Interveners
Preserve Agricultural Land
Blackfalds Mobile Park Ltd.
Holland, J.
Holland, Mrs.J.
Holland, L.
Holland, Mrs. L.
CP Rail
Town of Blackfalds
Blackfalds and District Chamber of Commerce
Johnstone, D.
Less detail

Decision 85-04

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1688
Applicant
Ocelot Industries Ltd.
Application Number
840711
Title
Decision on application by Ocelot Industries Ltd., 1985 (approval to modify its existing Peco central gas plant to recover ethane-plus liquids)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Ocelot Industries Ltd., 1985 (approval to modify its existing Peco central gas plant to recover ethane-plus liquids)
Date
1985
Applicant
Ocelot Industries Ltd.
Application Number
840711
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Ethane
Gas processing plant
Peco central gas plant
Benefit cost analysis
Economic analysis
Energy development
Liquefied natural gas
Marketing
NTS 83F
Petrochemical industry
Supply (economics)
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision D85-4 on application No. 840711 to construct facilities at Peco central gas plant in LSD 12-1-49-16 W5M to extract a mixture of ethane and heavier hydrocarbons as liquid from sales gas stream leaving plant; Board hearing 84-10-22/23/24
Interveners
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Dome Petroleum Limited
Petro-Canada Inc.
Do9w Chemical Canada Inc.
D.M. Wolcott & Associates Ltd.
Morgan Hydrocarbons Inc.
Home Oil Company Limited
Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
Atcor Resources Limited
Less detail

Decision 85-14

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1677
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
840607
840816
841010
841011
841012
841013
841014
841015
841016
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Gas cycling scheme, gas processing plant, sour gas production pipelines, fuel gas pipelines, sour gas injection pipeline, sweet gas)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Gas cycling scheme, gas processing plant, sour gas production pipelines, fuel gas pipelines, sour gas injection pipeline, sweet gas)
Date
1985
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
840607
840816
841010
841011
841012
841013
841014
841015
841016
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Energy development
Ethane
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas cycling
Gas pipeline
Gas processing plant
Gathering line
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Valhalla field
Wembley field
Benefit cost analysis
Dissolved gas
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Flare
Gas cap
Gas condensate recovery
Gas conservation
Gas injection
Liquefied natural gas
NTS 83M
Petrochemical industry
Pressure maintenance
Recovery
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision D85-14 on application No. 840607 for gas cycling scheme and No. 840816 for gas processing plant and on no'S 841010 through 841016 for pipelines to gather sour gas from wells and batteries to proposed plant (TP.72-75, R.8-9 W6M); Board hearing 1985-01-15/16
Interveners
Total Petroleum Canada Ltd.
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Atcor Resources Limited
Chieftan Development Co.Ltd.
Dow Chemical Canada Inc.
Ocelot Industries Ltd.
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Petro-Canada Inc.
Sulpetro Limited
South Peace Regional Planning Commission
Bear Lake Farm Rights Group
Central Peace Farm Rights Group
Less detail

Decision 85-33

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1086
Applicant
Anderson Exploration Limited
Application Number
850205
Title
Decision on application by Anderson Exploration Ltd., 1985 (approval to modify existing Dunvegan plant to recover ethane-plus liquid)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Anderson Exploration Ltd., 1985 (approval to modify existing Dunvegan plant to recover ethane-plus liquid)
Date
1985
Applicant
Anderson Exploration Limited
Application Number
850205
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Dunvegan field
Dunvegan gas plant
Ethane
Gas processing plant
Benefit cost analysis
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Liquefied natural gas
Marketing
Petrochemical industry
Producing cost
Supply (economics)
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision D85-33 on application No. 850205 to construct deep-cut facilities at its existing Dunvegan gas processing plant located in NE quarter of section 3-81-4 W6M to remove a mixture of ethane and heavier hydrocarbons (ethane-plus) from the sales gas stream leaving the plant; Board hearing 1985-04-30 and 1985-05-01/02/03/08
Interveners
Alberta Natural Gas Company Ltd.
Dome Petroleum Limited,
Petro-Canada Inc.
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Dow Chemical Canada Inc.
Union Carbide Ethylene Oxide/Glycol Company
Celanese Canada Inc.
C-I-L Inc.
Novacor Chemicals Ltd.
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
ATCOR Resources Limited
Esso Resources Canada Limited
Less detail

Decision 88-D

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision190
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
871318
Title
Alberta ethane policy report on implementation (ERCB inquiry)
Date
1988
Title
Alberta ethane policy report on implementation (ERCB inquiry)
Date
1988
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
871318
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Inquiry
Ethane
Descriptors
Allowable production
Demand (economics)
Ethane
Government policy
Marketing
Petrochemical industry
Raw material
Supply (economics)
Alberta
Economic forecasting
Extraction
Notes
ERCB report D88-D on proceeding No. 871318 to consult with industry regarding A request from the Alberta Government that the Board consult with the industry regarding the Government's policy on ethane; Board inquiry 1987-10-26 through 1987-12-14 (20 sitting days)
Less detail

Decision 90-20

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision67
Applicant
Electric Furnace Products Company Limited
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Application Number
891316
900177
901025
Title
Decision 90-20 : Electric Furnace Products Company Limited and Union Carbide Canada Limited : Application to amend existing industrial permit UC81-1.
Date
1990
Title
Decision 90-20 : Electric Furnace Products Company Limited and Union Carbide Canada Limited : Application to amend existing industrial permit UC81-1.
Date
1990
Applicant
Electric Furnace Products Company Limited
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Application Number
891316
900177
901025
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Prince JP
Morin EJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Blackfalds area
Chemical plant
Ethylene glycol
Industrial development permit
Pipeline construction permit
Product pipeline
Prentiss area
Emission
Environmental impact
Ethylene
Expansion
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 83A
Petrochemical industry
Route selection
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S30
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
Decision D90-20 on application No. 891316 to amend the existing industrial development permit no.UC 81-1 by increasing the approved quantity of ethylene glycol produced at its plant near Prentiss, section 30-39-25 W4M, from 264.5 to 366.0 Kilotonnes per year; on application No. 900177 for an industrial development permit authorizing the use of ethylene as feedstock and natural gas as fuel, over a permit term of 20 years, to manufacture ethylene glycol at an expansion of the existing Prentiss plant; and on application No. 901025 to construct 18 km of 168.3 MM outside diameter pipeline for the purpose of transporting ethylene glycol from its proposed Prentiss plant expansion to its existing Blackfalds rail car loading facility, section 11-26-39-27 W4M; Board hearing held 1990-11-05/06
Interveners
Pocock R.N.
Blackfalds Mobile Park Ltd.
Location
##-30-039-25W4
11-26-039-27W4
Less detail

Decision 2009-09

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4354
Applicant
Alberta Energy and Utilities Board
Application Number
1513726
Title
Decision 2009-009 : Inquiry into natural gas liquids (NGL) extraction matters
Date
2009
Title
Decision 2009-009 : Inquiry into natural gas liquids (NGL) extraction matters
Date
2009
Applicant
Alberta Energy and Utilities Board
Application Number
1513726
Hearing Panel
McManus BT
Dahl Rees C
DeSorcy G
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Energy resources
Descriptors
Natural gas
Extraction
Allowable production
Demand (economics)
Government policy
Marketing
Petrochemical industry
Raw material
Supply (economics)
Alberta
Economic forecasting
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S94
Energy Resources Conservation Act S21
Public Utilities Board Act S46
Alberta Utilities Commission Act S80(3)
Notes
Appendices 1 - 13 included
Interveners
Alberta Department of Energy
Alberta Ethane Gathering System L.P.
Alliance Pipeline Ltd.
AltaGas Ltd.
Amended Straddle Plant Group
ATCO Midstream Ltd.
ATCO Pipelines
Aux Sable Canada Ltd.
BP Canada Energy Company
Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers
Canadian Chemical Producers' Association
ConocoPhillips Canada Ltd.
Dpw Chemical Canada Inc.
EnCana Corporation
Government of the Northwest Territories
Industrial Gas Consumers Association of Alberta
Imperial Oil Resources
Inter Pipeline Fund
Keyera Energy Limited Partnership
Nexen Inc.
NOVA Chemicals Corporation
NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd
Utilities Consumer Advocate
Pembina Pipeline Corporation
Provident Energy Ltd
Quicksilver Resources Canada Inc
Shell Canada Energy, Shell Energy North America (Canada) Inc., Shell Canada Products, and Shell Chemicals Canada Ltd.
Spectra Energy Empress
State of Alaska
Straddle Plant Group
Talisman Energy Inc.
Taylor NGL Limited Partnership
Tenaska Marketing Ventures and Tenaska Marketing Canada
Western Export Group
Ziff Energy Group
Approval
Approved
Less detail

16 records – page 1 of 1.