22 records – page 1 of 2.

Decision 75-13

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2166
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
8597
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited and Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1975 (For permit to construct an oil line for the transmission of propane butanes and pentanes plus from the Candel Minnehik-Buck Lake gas plant)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited and Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1975 (For permit to construct an oil line for the transmission of propane butanes and pentanes plus from the Candel Minnehik-Buck Lake gas plant)
Date
1975
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
8597
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Butane
Liquefied natural gas
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Pentanes plus
Propane
Environmental impact
Legal References
Pipeline Act Part 2
Notes
Decision 75-13 on application No. 8597 to construct an oil pipeline to transport propane, butanes and pentanes plus from the Candel Minnehik-Buck Lake gas plant to the existing Cochrane to Edmonton pipeline; Board hearing 1975-08-28; adjourned to 1975-09-09
Interveners
CanDel Oil Ltd.
Goliad Oil & Gas Company
Pembina Pipe Line Ltd.
M.L.A. for Drayton Valley
Less detail

Decision 77-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2143
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
9608
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (permit to construct a pipeline from red deer to Fort Saskatchewan, part 1)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (permit to construct a pipeline from red deer to Fort Saskatchewan, part 1)
Date
1977
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
9608
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Butane
Ethane
Fort Saskatchewan area
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Pentanes plus
Propane
Red Deer area
NTS 83A
NTS 83H
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 77-5 on application No. 9608 to construct an oil line to transport ethane, propane, butanes and pentanes plus from the age plant under construction near Joffre and from Dome's Edmonton liquid gas plant to storage and eventual delivery to the Cochin pipeline at Fort Saskatchewan; Board hearing 1977-02-09 reconvened 1977-03-08; see also Decision 77-06
Interveners
The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Aristocrat Holdings Ltd.
The Battle River Regional Planning Commission
Dow Chemical of Canda Limited
Hampson, C.G.
Harmin Farms
Mayer, H.
Paley, M.
Heppner, E.
Heppner, L.W.
Heppner, M.M.
Heppner, E.A.
Heppner, M.M.R.
Chimer, W.
Cathton Holdings Ltd.
Fenske, W.A.
Lengert, H.
Lentz, C.
Madison Development Corporation Ltd.
Opaninski, B
Opalinski, T.
Yaskowich, J
Ziobro, S.
Shell Canada Resources Limited
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Kataleen, A.Y.
Less detail

Decision 77-06

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2142
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
9608
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (permit to construct a pipeline from Red Deer To Fort Saskatchewan, part 2)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (permit to construct a pipeline from Red Deer To Fort Saskatchewan, part 2)
Date
1977
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
9608
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Butane
Ethane
Fort Saskatchewan area
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Pentanes plus
Propane
NTS 83H
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 77-6 on application No. 9608 to construct a pipeline to transport ethane, propane, butanes and pentanes PLU Board hearing 1977-02-09 reconvened 1977-03-08 see also Decision 77-5 for part 1
Interveners
The Alberta Gas Ethelene Company Ltd.
Aristocrat Holdings Ltd.
The Battle River Regional Planning Commission
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Hampson, C.G.
Harmin Farms
Mayer, H.
Paley, M.
Heppner, E.
Heppner, L.W.
Heppner, M.M.
Heppner, E.A.
Heppner, M.R.
Chimera, W.
Cathton Holdings Ltd.
Fenske, W.A.
Lengert, H.
Lentz, C.
Madison Development Corporation Ltd.
Opalinski, B.
Opalinski, J.
Yaskowich, J.
Ziobro, S.
Shell Canada Resources Limited
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Kataleen, A.Y.
Less detail

Decision 77-10

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2138
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
770084
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (construct a pipeline from Cochrane to Red Deer)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (construct a pipeline from Cochrane to Red Deer)
Date
1977
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
770084
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Butane
Ethane
Cochrane area
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Pentanes plus
Propane
Red Deer area
Chemical plant
Environmental impact
NTS 82P
NTS 83A
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Safety
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 77-10 on application No. 770084 to construct an oil line to transport ethane, propane, butane and pentanes plus from a point in the NE quarter of section 16, TP.26, R.4 (W5M) near Cochrane to a point in the NW quarter of section 8, TP.38, R.25 (W4M) near Red Deer as part of the Alberta ethane gathering system to provide a continous supply of ethane to the age plant at Joffre.
Interveners
Alberta Natural Gas Company Ltd.
Beddoes, J.L.
Less detail

Decision 77-C

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2373
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited
Mitsubishi Corporation
Petalta Project (Petrochemicals Alberta Project)
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
Application Number
9070
8911
Title
Decision on application by Petalta Project (Alberta Energy Company Ltd, Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited, and Mitsubishi Corporation), 1977 (benzene plant) and Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line, Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited and Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1977 (benzene plant)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Petalta Project (Alberta Energy Company Ltd, Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited, and Mitsubishi Corporation), 1977 (benzene plant) and Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line, Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited and Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1977 (benzene plant)
Date
1977
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited
Mitsubishi Corporation
Petalta Project (Petrochemicals Alberta Project)
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
Application Number
9070
8911
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Berkowitz N
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Benzene
Bruderheim area
Chemical plant
Fort Saskatchewan area
Industrial development permit
Petalta Project (Petrochemicals Alberta Project)
Benefit cost analysis
Economic analysis
NTS 83H
Pentanes plus - fuel
Pentanes plus - raw material
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 77-C on application No. 9070 by AEC et al (Petalta) for a plant to be located near Fort Saskatchewan to convert pentanes plus to benzene and liquid byproducts and on application No. 8911 by AGTL et al for a plant to be constructed near Bruderheim to convert pentanes plus to benzene and liquid byproduct (including gasoline or diesel fuel); Board hearing (Petalta project APP # 9070) 1976-06-15/16 and 1976-07-05; Board hearing (AGTL Bruderheim APP # 8911) 1977-07-06/07/08/09
Less detail

Decision 77-H

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2368
Applicant
Turbo Resources Limited
Application Number
770040
Title
Decision on application by Turbo Resources Limited, 1977 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Turbo Resources Limited, 1977 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1977
Applicant
Turbo Resources Limited
Application Number
770040
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Benzene
Chemical plant
Edmonton area
Gas
Industrial development permit
Naphtha
Petroleum product
Toluene
Crude oil - raw material
Economic analysis
ERCB 77-C
NTS 83H
Pentanes plus - raw material
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 77-H on application No. 770040 (application subsequently withdrawn) for an IDP to use crude oil and pentanes plus to manufacture benzene-toluene (BT) naptha, motor gasoline, recycled lube oils and other by-products in a plant to be constructed 3 miles east of Edmonton; Board hearing 1977-05-04/05
Less detail

Decision 78-23

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2097
Applicant
Petrochemicals Alberta Project
Application Number
780591
Title
Decision on application by Petrochemicals Alberta Project, 1978 (amendment of industrial development permit No. PAP 78-1)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Petrochemicals Alberta Project, 1978 (amendment of industrial development permit No. PAP 78-1)
Date
1978
Applicant
Petrochemicals Alberta Project
Application Number
780591
Hearing Panel
N/A
Hearing Type
N/A
No Hearing
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Benzene
Chemical plant
Fort Saskatchewan area
Industrial development permit
Benefit cost analysis
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 83G
Pentanes plus - raw material
Revision
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 78-23 on application No. 780591 to amend IDP No. PAP 78-1 to decrease use of pentanes plus as raw material and increase use of natural gas as raw material; no hearing; see also related ERCB reports 77-C and 77-H
Less detail

Decision 78-C

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2332
Applicant
Gulf Oil Canada Limited
Application Number
770220
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Oil Canada Limited, 1978 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Oil Canada Limited, 1978 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1978
Applicant
Gulf Oil Canada Limited
Application Number
770220
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Industrial development permit
Oil refinery
Edmonton area
Petroleum product
Butane
Crude oil
Demand (economics)
ERCB 77-C
ERCB 77-H
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 83H
Pentanes plus - raw material
Raw material
Supply (economics)
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 78-C on application No. 770220 for an IDP authorizing use of crude oil, butanes and gas as feedstock & fuel and pentanes-plus as raw material and gas to manufacture refinery products (gasoline and diesel fuel) at its Edmonton refinery (section 5, TP.52, R.23, W4M); permit GOC 78-2
Less detail

Decision 79-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2093
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Application Number
780619
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd., 1979 (industrial development permit to manufacture substitute natural gas)
Date
1979
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd., 1979 (industrial development permit to manufacture substitute natural gas)
Date
1979
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Application Number
780619
Hearing Panel
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Bruderheim area
Industrial development permit
Manufactured gas
Benefit cost analysis
Byproduct
Cost analysis
Demand (economics)
Efficiency
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 83H
Pentanes plus
Plant design
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 79-3 on application No. 780619 to construct a substitute natural gas plant near Bruderheim, to use byproduct from the Petalta benzene plant and natural gas as feedstock and fuel in the manufacture of the SNG; see related Decision 79-4 for Decision on gas removal application
Interveners
Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd.
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Dow Chemical of Canada Ltd.
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Pan-Alberta Gas Ltd.
TransCanada PipeLines Limited
Turbo Resources Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 80-12

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2027
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
800229
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Limited, 1980 (industrial development permit synthetic crude oil refinery)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Limited, 1980 (industrial development permit synthetic crude oil refinery)
Date
1980
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
800229
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Benzene
Butane
Industrial development permit
Manufactured crude oil
Oil refinery
Pentanes plus
Petroleum product
Propane
Scotford area
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
NTS 83H
Raw material
Socio-economic effect
Oil sands oil
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 80-12 on application No. 800229 to use synthetic crude oil, natural gas liquids & gas to manufacture refinery products, benzene, N-Hexane, propane, butanes & pentanes plus in a new refinery to be constructed near Scotford in TP.55, R.23, W4M and TP.56, R.21, W4M.
Interveners
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Chevron Standard Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Fort Saskatchewan Chamber of Commerce
Gulf Canada Limited
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Imperial Oil Limited
Turbo Resources Limited
Less detail

Decision 80-28

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2011
Applicant
Gulf Canada Limited
Application Number
800593
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Limited, 1980 (amendment to industrial development permit GOC 78-2 to expand Stratcona refinery)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Limited, 1980 (amendment to industrial development permit GOC 78-2 to expand Stratcona refinery)
Date
1980
Applicant
Gulf Canada Limited
Application Number
800593
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Butane
Edmonton area
Industrial development permit
Oil refinery
Petroleum product
Propane
Demand (economics)
Expansion
Manufactured crude oil
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 83H
Pentanes plus
Raw material
Socio-economic effect
Supply (economics)
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 80-28 on application No. 800593 to amend existing IDP GOC 78-2 to expand Gulf Strathcona refinery and use crude oil, butanes, pentanes plus and gas as feedstock and fuel in the production of refinery products, propane and butanes; Board hearing 1980-10-28/29
Interveners
Chevron Canada Liimited
Husky Oil Operations Lt.d
Imperial Oil Limited
Turbo Resources Limited
Less detail

Decision 82-27

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2051
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Chevron Standard Limited
Application Number
810916
811009
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited and Chevron Standard Limited, 1982 (Propane extraction plant and fractionation plant fort Saskatchewan)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited and Chevron Standard Limited, 1982 (Propane extraction plant and fractionation plant fort Saskatchewan)
Date
1982
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Chevron Standard Limited
Application Number
810916
811009
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Goodman CJ
Warne GA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Fort Saskatchewan field
Fractionation
Gas processing plant
Liquefied natural gas
Butane
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Ethane
Expansion
Gas storage
NTS 83H
Pentanes plus
Petrochemical industry
Propane
Raw material
Storage facility
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision 82-27 on application No. 810916 by Dome for fractionating NGL at its existing cavern storage facilities and on No. 811009 by Chevron to expand its existing fractionation facilities (TP.55, R.22, W4M).
Interveners
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Esso Chemical Company
Hudson's Bay Chemical Company Ltd.
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Alberta Natural Gas Company Ltd.
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Esso Resources Canada Ltd.
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Petro-Canada Exploration Inc.
Sulpetro Limited
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 83-E

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2275
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Title
Alberta oil supply, 1983-2007
Date
1983
Title
Alberta oil supply, 1983-2007
Date
1983
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Category
Oil supply
Descriptors
Crude oil supply
Energy data
Enhanced oil recovery
Forecasting
Oil reserve
Producing capacity
Oil sands reserve
Alberta
Bitumen
Crude oil
Manufactured crude oil
Pentanes plus
Oil sands oil
Viscous crude oil
Notes
ERCB report 83-E, updates report 81-B; superseded by ERCB report 85-A
Less detail

Decision 85-A

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1676
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Title
Alberta oil supply 1985-2000
Date
1985

Decision 88-E

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision148
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Title
Alberta oil supply 1988-2003
Date
1988
Title
Alberta oil supply 1988-2003
Date
1988
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Descriptors
Crude oil supply
Economic forecasting
Energy data
Oil reserve
Producing capacity
Alberta
Bitumen
Crude oil
Manufactured crude oil
Pentanes plus
Notes
see also later update to this forecast published as ERCB report 90-A
Less detail

Decision 90-A

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision94
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Title
Alberta oil supply 1990-2004: update of ERCB 88-E
Date
1990
Title
Alberta oil supply 1990-2004: update of ERCB 88-E
Date
1990
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Category
Oil supply
Descriptors
Crude oil supply
Economic forecasting
Energy data
Oil reserve
Producing capacity
Alberta
Bitumen
Crude oil
Manufactured crude oil
Pentanes plus
Notes
ERCB report 90-A updating the oil supply forecasts published in report 88-E
Less detail

Decision 94-B

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Title
Alberta oil supply 1994-2005 : update
Date
1994
Title
Alberta oil supply 1994-2005 : update
Date
1994
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Category
Oil supply
Descriptors
Crude oil supply
Economic forecasting
Energy data
Oil reserve
Producing capacity
Alberta
Bitumen
Crude oil
Manufactured crude oil
Pentanes plus
Notes
ERCB report 94-B updating the oil supply forecasts published in report 88-E and report 90-A
Less detail

Decision 97-06

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2755
Applicant
Novagas Clearinghouse Ltd.
Application Number
1000947
1002782
Title
Decision 97-06: Novagas Clearinghouse Ltd. : Applications to construct and operate a fractionation facility and high and low vapour pressure pipelines Redwater to Fort Saskatchewan area
Date
1997
Title
Decision 97-06: Novagas Clearinghouse Ltd. : Applications to construct and operate a fractionation facility and high and low vapour pressure pipelines Redwater to Fort Saskatchewan area
Date
1997
Applicant
Novagas Clearinghouse Ltd.
Application Number
1000947
1002782
Hearing Panel
Dilay JD
Prince JP
MacDonald NW
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Butane
Gas pipeline
Ethane
Fort Saskatchewan area
Fractionation
Liquefied petroleum gas
NTS 83H
Pentanes plus
Pipeline construction permit
Propane
Storage facility
Notes
Decision on application to construct and operate a liquid fractionation facility in the Redwater area (Lsd 9 Sec 1 Twp 56 Rge 22 W4M) to reprocess ethane plus mix to recover ethane, propane, butane and pentanes plus; and on application no. 1002782 to construct and operate 5 pipelines to transport HVP/LVP products from the fractionator facility to existing pipelines and associated facilities in the Fort Saskatchewan area
Interveners
Gulf Canada Resources Limited
Chevron Canada Resources
Dow Canada Chemical Inc
Imperial Oil Limited
Kinetic Resources
Anez VM
Approval
Approved
Location
09-01-056-22W4
Less detail

Decision E65-(p.367)

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1353
Applicant
Royalite Oil Company Limited
Application Number
2667
Title
Examiners report on application by Royalite Oil Company Limited on behalf of itself and others, 1965 (cycle a portion of the Turner Valley gas cap)
Date
1965
Title
Examiners report on application by Royalite Oil Company Limited on behalf of itself and others, 1965 (cycle a portion of the Turner Valley gas cap)
Date
1965
Applicant
Royalite Oil Company Limited
Application Number
2667
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Lashuk NJ
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Unit agreement
Descriptors
Unit operation
Turner Valley field
Enhanced recovery scheme
Pentanes plus
Gas conservation
Gas injection
Gas cap
Gas cycling
Notes
Examiners report on application requesting permission to cycle a portion of the Turner Valley gas cap; the scheme would involve injecting gas into the wells Royalite 6, Royalite 23, Spooner 1, Spooner 4, Mayland 3, Mayland 6, and Sterling Pacific 2.
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision E65-(p.382)

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1350
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
2653
Title
Examiners report on application by Shell Canada Limited, 1965 (acceleration and increased recovery of liquid hydrocarbons and sulphur from the Waterton Rundle "B" pool)
Date
1965
Title
Examiners report on application by Shell Canada Limited, 1965 (acceleration and increased recovery of liquid hydrocarbons and sulphur from the Waterton Rundle "B" pool)
Date
1965
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
2653
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Lashuk NJ
Watkins GC
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Enhanced recovery scheme
Pentanes plus
Gas injection
Sulphur recovery
Waterton field
Notes
Examiners report on application requesting approval for a scheme of residual gas injection through the well Waterton No. 12 and through a well to be drilled in LSD.15-4-4-1 W5; applicant asserts that the scheme will increase overall pentanes plus and sulphur recovery.
Less detail

22 records – page 1 of 2.