Narrow Results By
Applicant
- Alberta Energy Company Limited 2
- Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited 1
- Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited 4
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited 1
- Chevron Standard Limited 2
- Dome Petroleum Limited 6
- Dow Chemical of Canada Limited 1
- Energy Resources Conservation Board 5
- Gulf Canada Limited 1
- Gulf Oil Canada Limited 1
- Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited 1
- Mitsubishi Corporation 1
Decision 75-13
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2166
- Applicant
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
- Application Number
- 8597
- Title
- Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited and Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1975 (For permit to construct an oil line for the transmission of propane butanes and pentanes plus from the Candel Minnehik-Buck Lake gas plant)
- Date
- 1975
- Title
- Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited and Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1975 (For permit to construct an oil line for the transmission of propane butanes and pentanes plus from the Candel Minnehik-Buck Lake gas plant)
- Date
- 1975
- Application Number
- 8597
- Hearing Panel
- Craig DR
- Millard V
- DeSorcy GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Pipelines
- Descriptors
- Butane
- Liquefied natural gas
- Oil pipeline
- Pipeline construction permit
- Pentanes plus
- Propane
- Environmental impact
- Legal References
- Pipeline Act Part 2
- Notes
- Decision 75-13 on application No. 8597 to construct an oil pipeline to transport propane, butanes and pentanes plus from the Candel Minnehik-Buck Lake gas plant to the existing Cochrane to Edmonton pipeline; Board hearing 1975-08-28; adjourned to 1975-09-09
- Interveners
- CanDel Oil Ltd.
- Goliad Oil & Gas Company
- Pembina Pipe Line Ltd.
- M.L.A. for Drayton Valley
Decision 77-05
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2143
- Applicant
- Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 9608
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (permit to construct a pipeline from red deer to Fort Saskatchewan, part 1)
- Date
- 1977
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (permit to construct a pipeline from red deer to Fort Saskatchewan, part 1)
- Date
- 1977
- Application Number
- 9608
- Hearing Panel
- Craig DR
- Millard V
- DeSorcy GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Pipelines
- Descriptors
- Edmonton area
- Butane
- Ethane
- Fort Saskatchewan area
- Oil pipeline
- Pipeline construction permit
- Pentanes plus
- Propane
- Red Deer area
- NTS 83A
- NTS 83H
- Pipeline design
- Pipeline route
- Route selection
- Safety
- Legal References
- Pipeline Act
- Notes
- Decision 77-5 on application No. 9608 to construct an oil line to transport ethane, propane, butanes and pentanes plus from the age plant under construction near Joffre and from Dome's Edmonton liquid gas plant to storage and eventual delivery to the Cochin pipeline at Fort Saskatchewan; Board hearing 1977-02-09 reconvened 1977-03-08; see also Decision 77-06
- Interveners
- The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
- Aristocrat Holdings Ltd.
- The Battle River Regional Planning Commission
- Dow Chemical of Canda Limited
- Hampson, C.G.
- Harmin Farms
- Mayer, H.
- Paley, M.
- Heppner, E.
- Heppner, L.W.
- Heppner, M.M.
- Heppner, E.A.
- Heppner, M.M.R.
- Chimer, W.
- Cathton Holdings Ltd.
- Fenske, W.A.
- Lengert, H.
- Lentz, C.
- Madison Development Corporation Ltd.
- Opaninski, B
- Opalinski, T.
- Yaskowich, J
- Ziobro, S.
- Shell Canada Resources Limited
- PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
- Kataleen, A.Y.
Decision 77-06
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2142
- Applicant
- Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 9608
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (permit to construct a pipeline from Red Deer To Fort Saskatchewan, part 2)
- Date
- 1977
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (permit to construct a pipeline from Red Deer To Fort Saskatchewan, part 2)
- Date
- 1977
- Application Number
- 9608
- Hearing Panel
- Craig DR
- Millard V
- DeSorcy GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Pipelines
- Descriptors
- Edmonton area
- Butane
- Ethane
- Fort Saskatchewan area
- Oil pipeline
- Pipeline construction permit
- Pentanes plus
- Propane
- NTS 83H
- Pipeline design
- Pipeline route
- Route selection
- Safety
- Legal References
- Pipeline Act
- Notes
- Decision 77-6 on application No. 9608 to construct a pipeline to transport ethane, propane, butanes and pentanes PLU Board hearing 1977-02-09 reconvened 1977-03-08 see also Decision 77-5 for part 1
- Interveners
- The Alberta Gas Ethelene Company Ltd.
- Aristocrat Holdings Ltd.
- The Battle River Regional Planning Commission
- Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
- Hampson, C.G.
- Harmin Farms
- Mayer, H.
- Paley, M.
- Heppner, E.
- Heppner, L.W.
- Heppner, M.M.
- Heppner, E.A.
- Heppner, M.R.
- Chimera, W.
- Cathton Holdings Ltd.
- Fenske, W.A.
- Lengert, H.
- Lentz, C.
- Madison Development Corporation Ltd.
- Opalinski, B.
- Opalinski, J.
- Yaskowich, J.
- Ziobro, S.
- Shell Canada Resources Limited
- PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
- Kataleen, A.Y.
Decision 77-10
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2138
- Applicant
- Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 770084
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (construct a pipeline from Cochrane to Red Deer)
- Date
- 1977
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (construct a pipeline from Cochrane to Red Deer)
- Date
- 1977
- Application Number
- 770084
- Hearing Panel
- Craig DR
- Millard V
- DeSorcy GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Pipelines
- Descriptors
- Butane
- Ethane
- Cochrane area
- Oil pipeline
- Pipeline construction permit
- Pentanes plus
- Propane
- Red Deer area
- Chemical plant
- Environmental impact
- NTS 82P
- NTS 83A
- Pipeline design
- Pipeline route
- Safety
- Legal References
- Pipeline Act
- Notes
- Decision 77-10 on application No. 770084 to construct an oil line to transport ethane, propane, butane and pentanes plus from a point in the NE quarter of section 16, TP.26, R.4 (W5M) near Cochrane to a point in the NW quarter of section 8, TP.38, R.25 (W4M) near Red Deer as part of the Alberta ethane gathering system to provide a continous supply of ethane to the age plant at Joffre.
- Interveners
- Alberta Natural Gas Company Ltd.
- Beddoes, J.L.
Decision 77-C
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2373
- Applicant
- Alberta Energy Company Limited
- Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
- Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited
- Mitsubishi Corporation
- Petalta Project (Petrochemicals Alberta Project)
- Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
- Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
- Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
- Application Number
- 9070
- 8911
- Title
- Decision on application by Petalta Project (Alberta Energy Company Ltd, Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited, and Mitsubishi Corporation), 1977 (benzene plant) and Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line, Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited and Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1977 (benzene plant)
- Date
- 1977
- Title
- Decision on application by Petalta Project (Alberta Energy Company Ltd, Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited, and Mitsubishi Corporation), 1977 (benzene plant) and Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line, Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited and Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1977 (benzene plant)
- Date
- 1977
- Applicant
- Alberta Energy Company Limited
- Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
- Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited
- Mitsubishi Corporation
- Petalta Project (Petrochemicals Alberta Project)
- Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
- Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
- Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
- Application Number
- 9070
- 8911
- Hearing Panel
- Craig DR
- Berkowitz N
- DeSorcy GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Benzene
- Bruderheim area
- Chemical plant
- Fort Saskatchewan area
- Industrial development permit
- Petalta Project (Petrochemicals Alberta Project)
- Benefit cost analysis
- Economic analysis
- NTS 83H
- Pentanes plus - fuel
- Pentanes plus - raw material
- Socio-economic effect
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- ERCB report 77-C on application No. 9070 by AEC et al (Petalta) for a plant to be located near Fort Saskatchewan to convert pentanes plus to benzene and liquid byproducts and on application No. 8911 by AGTL et al for a plant to be constructed near Bruderheim to convert pentanes plus to benzene and liquid byproduct (including gasoline or diesel fuel); Board hearing (Petalta project APP # 9070) 1976-06-15/16 and 1976-07-05; Board hearing (AGTL Bruderheim APP # 8911) 1977-07-06/07/08/09
Decision 77-H
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2368
- Applicant
- Turbo Resources Limited
- Application Number
- 770040
- Title
- Decision on application by Turbo Resources Limited, 1977 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
- Date
- 1977
- Title
- Decision on application by Turbo Resources Limited, 1977 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
- Date
- 1977
- Applicant
- Turbo Resources Limited
- Application Number
- 770040
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Benzene
- Chemical plant
- Edmonton area
- Gas
- Industrial development permit
- Naphtha
- Petroleum product
- Toluene
- Crude oil - raw material
- Economic analysis
- ERCB 77-C
- NTS 83H
- Pentanes plus - raw material
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- ERCB report 77-H on application No. 770040 (application subsequently withdrawn) for an IDP to use crude oil and pentanes plus to manufacture benzene-toluene (BT) naptha, motor gasoline, recycled lube oils and other by-products in a plant to be constructed 3 miles east of Edmonton; Board hearing 1977-05-04/05
Decision 78-23
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2097
- Applicant
- Petrochemicals Alberta Project
- Application Number
- 780591
- Title
- Decision on application by Petrochemicals Alberta Project, 1978 (amendment of industrial development permit No. PAP 78-1)
- Date
- 1978
- Title
- Decision on application by Petrochemicals Alberta Project, 1978 (amendment of industrial development permit No. PAP 78-1)
- Date
- 1978
- Applicant
- Petrochemicals Alberta Project
- Application Number
- 780591
- Hearing Panel
- N/A
- Hearing Type
- N/A
- No Hearing
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Benzene
- Chemical plant
- Fort Saskatchewan area
- Industrial development permit
- Benefit cost analysis
- Natural gas - raw material
- NTS 83G
- Pentanes plus - raw material
- Revision
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- Decision 78-23 on application No. 780591 to amend IDP No. PAP 78-1 to decrease use of pentanes plus as raw material and increase use of natural gas as raw material; no hearing; see also related ERCB reports 77-C and 77-H
Decision 78-C
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2332
- Applicant
- Gulf Oil Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 770220
- Title
- Decision on application by Gulf Oil Canada Limited, 1978 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
- Date
- 1978
- Title
- Decision on application by Gulf Oil Canada Limited, 1978 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
- Date
- 1978
- Applicant
- Gulf Oil Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 770220
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Industrial development permit
- Oil refinery
- Edmonton area
- Petroleum product
- Butane
- Crude oil
- Demand (economics)
- ERCB 77-C
- ERCB 77-H
- Marketing
- Natural gas - fuel
- Natural gas - raw material
- NTS 83H
- Pentanes plus - raw material
- Raw material
- Supply (economics)
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- ERCB report 78-C on application No. 770220 for an IDP authorizing use of crude oil, butanes and gas as feedstock & fuel and pentanes-plus as raw material and gas to manufacture refinery products (gasoline and diesel fuel) at its Edmonton refinery (section 5, TP.52, R.23, W4M); permit GOC 78-2
Decision 79-03
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2093
- Applicant
- Alberta Energy Company Limited
- Application Number
- 780619
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd., 1979 (industrial development permit to manufacture substitute natural gas)
- Date
- 1979
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd., 1979 (industrial development permit to manufacture substitute natural gas)
- Date
- 1979
- Applicant
- Alberta Energy Company Limited
- Application Number
- 780619
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- DeSorcy GJ
- Goodman CJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Bruderheim area
- Industrial development permit
- Manufactured gas
- Benefit cost analysis
- Byproduct
- Cost analysis
- Demand (economics)
- Efficiency
- Natural gas - fuel
- Natural gas - raw material
- NTS 83H
- Pentanes plus
- Plant design
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- Decision 79-3 on application No. 780619 to construct a substitute natural gas plant near Bruderheim, to use byproduct from the Petalta benzene plant and natural gas as feedstock and fuel in the manufacture of the SNG; see related Decision 79-4 for Decision on gas removal application
- Interveners
- Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd.
- Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
- Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
- Northwestern Utilities Limited
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Dow Chemical of Canada Ltd.
- Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
- Pan-Alberta Gas Ltd.
- TransCanada PipeLines Limited
- Turbo Resources Ltd.
Decision 80-12
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2027
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 800229
- Title
- Decision on application by Shell Canada Limited, 1980 (industrial development permit synthetic crude oil refinery)
- Date
- 1980
- Title
- Decision on application by Shell Canada Limited, 1980 (industrial development permit synthetic crude oil refinery)
- Date
- 1980
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 800229
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Bohme VE
- Mink FJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Benzene
- Butane
- Industrial development permit
- Manufactured crude oil
- Oil refinery
- Pentanes plus
- Petroleum product
- Propane
- Scotford area
- Demand (economics)
- Economic analysis
- Environmental impact
- NTS 83H
- Raw material
- Socio-economic effect
- Oil sands oil
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- Decision 80-12 on application No. 800229 to use synthetic crude oil, natural gas liquids & gas to manufacture refinery products, benzene, N-Hexane, propane, butanes & pentanes plus in a new refinery to be constructed near Scotford in TP.55, R.23, W4M and TP.56, R.21, W4M.
- Interveners
- Alberta Energy Company Limited
- Chevron Standard Limited
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Fort Saskatchewan Chamber of Commerce
- Gulf Canada Limited
- Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
- Imperial Oil Limited
- Turbo Resources Limited
Decision 80-28
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2011
- Applicant
- Gulf Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 800593
- Title
- Decision on application by Gulf Canada Limited, 1980 (amendment to industrial development permit GOC 78-2 to expand Stratcona refinery)
- Date
- 1980
- Title
- Decision on application by Gulf Canada Limited, 1980 (amendment to industrial development permit GOC 78-2 to expand Stratcona refinery)
- Date
- 1980
- Applicant
- Gulf Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 800593
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Bohme VE
- Strom NA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Butane
- Edmonton area
- Industrial development permit
- Oil refinery
- Petroleum product
- Propane
- Demand (economics)
- Expansion
- Manufactured crude oil
- Natural gas - fuel
- Natural gas - raw material
- NTS 83H
- Pentanes plus
- Raw material
- Socio-economic effect
- Supply (economics)
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- Decision 80-28 on application No. 800593 to amend existing IDP GOC 78-2 to expand Gulf Strathcona refinery and use crude oil, butanes, pentanes plus and gas as feedstock and fuel in the production of refinery products, propane and butanes; Board hearing 1980-10-28/29
- Interveners
- Chevron Canada Liimited
- Husky Oil Operations Lt.d
- Imperial Oil Limited
- Turbo Resources Limited
Decision 82-27
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2051
- Applicant
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Chevron Standard Limited
- Application Number
- 810916
- 811009
- Title
- Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited and Chevron Standard Limited, 1982 (Propane extraction plant and fractionation plant fort Saskatchewan)
- Date
- 1982
- Title
- Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited and Chevron Standard Limited, 1982 (Propane extraction plant and fractionation plant fort Saskatchewan)
- Date
- 1982
- Application Number
- 810916
- 811009
- Hearing Panel
- Berkowitz N
- Goodman CJ
- Warne GA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Fort Saskatchewan field
- Fractionation
- Gas processing plant
- Liquefied natural gas
- Butane
- Economic analysis
- Environmental impact
- Ethane
- Expansion
- Gas storage
- NTS 83H
- Pentanes plus
- Petrochemical industry
- Propane
- Raw material
- Storage facility
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Notes
- Decision 82-27 on application No. 810916 by Dome for fractionating NGL at its existing cavern storage facilities and on No. 811009 by Chevron to expand its existing fractionation facilities (TP.55, R.22, W4M).
- Interveners
- Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
- Esso Chemical Company
- Hudson's Bay Chemical Company Ltd.
- Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
- Alberta Natural Gas Company Ltd.
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
- Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
- Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
- Esso Resources Canada Ltd.
- Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
- PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
- Petro-Canada Exploration Inc.
- Sulpetro Limited
- Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Decision 83-E
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2275
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Title
- Alberta oil supply, 1983-2007
- Date
- 1983
- Title
- Alberta oil supply, 1983-2007
- Date
- 1983
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Category
- Oil supply
- Descriptors
- Crude oil supply
- Energy data
- Enhanced oil recovery
- Forecasting
- Oil reserve
- Producing capacity
- Oil sands reserve
- Alberta
- Bitumen
- Crude oil
- Manufactured crude oil
- Pentanes plus
- Oil sands oil
- Viscous crude oil
- Notes
- ERCB report 83-E, updates report 81-B; superseded by ERCB report 85-A
Decision 85-A
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1676
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Title
- Alberta oil supply 1985-2000
- Date
- 1985
- Title
- Alberta oil supply 1985-2000
- Date
- 1985
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Category
- Energy resources
- Descriptors
- Crude oil supply
- Economic forecasting
- Energy data
- Oil reserve
- Producing capacity
- Alberta
- Bitumen
- Crude oil
- Manufactured crude oil
- Pentanes plus
Decision 88-E
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision148
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Title
- Alberta oil supply 1988-2003
- Date
- 1988
- Title
- Alberta oil supply 1988-2003
- Date
- 1988
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Descriptors
- Crude oil supply
- Economic forecasting
- Energy data
- Oil reserve
- Producing capacity
- Alberta
- Bitumen
- Crude oil
- Manufactured crude oil
- Pentanes plus
- Notes
- see also later update to this forecast published as ERCB report 90-A
Decision 90-A
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision94
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Title
- Alberta oil supply 1990-2004: update of ERCB 88-E
- Date
- 1990
- Title
- Alberta oil supply 1990-2004: update of ERCB 88-E
- Date
- 1990
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Category
- Oil supply
- Descriptors
- Crude oil supply
- Economic forecasting
- Energy data
- Oil reserve
- Producing capacity
- Alberta
- Bitumen
- Crude oil
- Manufactured crude oil
- Pentanes plus
- Notes
- ERCB report 90-A updating the oil supply forecasts published in report 88-E
Decision 94-B
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Title
- Alberta oil supply 1994-2005 : update
- Date
- 1994
- Title
- Alberta oil supply 1994-2005 : update
- Date
- 1994
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Category
- Oil supply
- Descriptors
- Crude oil supply
- Economic forecasting
- Energy data
- Oil reserve
- Producing capacity
- Alberta
- Bitumen
- Crude oil
- Manufactured crude oil
- Pentanes plus
- Notes
- ERCB report 94-B updating the oil supply forecasts published in report 88-E and report 90-A
Decision 97-06
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2755
- Applicant
- Novagas Clearinghouse Ltd.
- Application Number
- 1000947
- 1002782
- Title
- Decision 97-06: Novagas Clearinghouse Ltd. : Applications to construct and operate a fractionation facility and high and low vapour pressure pipelines Redwater to Fort Saskatchewan area
- Date
- 1997
- Title
- Decision 97-06: Novagas Clearinghouse Ltd. : Applications to construct and operate a fractionation facility and high and low vapour pressure pipelines Redwater to Fort Saskatchewan area
- Date
- 1997
- Applicant
- Novagas Clearinghouse Ltd.
- Application Number
- 1000947
- 1002782
- Hearing Panel
- Dilay JD
- Prince JP
- MacDonald NW
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Pipelines
- Descriptors
- Butane
- Gas pipeline
- Ethane
- Fort Saskatchewan area
- Fractionation
- Liquefied petroleum gas
- NTS 83H
- Pentanes plus
- Pipeline construction permit
- Propane
- Storage facility
- Notes
- Decision on application to construct and operate a liquid fractionation facility in the Redwater area (Lsd 9 Sec 1 Twp 56 Rge 22 W4M) to reprocess ethane plus mix to recover ethane, propane, butane and pentanes plus; and on application no. 1002782 to construct and operate 5 pipelines to transport HVP/LVP products from the fractionator facility to existing pipelines and associated facilities in the Fort Saskatchewan area
- Interveners
- Gulf Canada Resources Limited
- Chevron Canada Resources
- Dow Canada Chemical Inc
- Imperial Oil Limited
- Kinetic Resources
- Anez VM
- Approval
- Approved
- Location
- 09-01-056-22W4
Decision E65-(p.367)
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1353
- Applicant
- Royalite Oil Company Limited
- Application Number
- 2667
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Royalite Oil Company Limited on behalf of itself and others, 1965 (cycle a portion of the Turner Valley gas cap)
- Date
- 1965
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Royalite Oil Company Limited on behalf of itself and others, 1965 (cycle a portion of the Turner Valley gas cap)
- Date
- 1965
- Applicant
- Royalite Oil Company Limited
- Application Number
- 2667
- Hearing Panel
- Craig DR
- Lashuk NJ
- Strom NA
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Unit agreement
- Descriptors
- Unit operation
- Turner Valley field
- Enhanced recovery scheme
- Pentanes plus
- Gas conservation
- Gas injection
- Gas cap
- Gas cycling
- Notes
- Examiners report on application requesting permission to cycle a portion of the Turner Valley gas cap; the scheme would involve injecting gas into the wells Royalite 6, Royalite 23, Spooner 1, Spooner 4, Mayland 3, Mayland 6, and Sterling Pacific 2.
- Approval
- Approved
Decision E65-(p.382)
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1350
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 2653
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Shell Canada Limited, 1965 (acceleration and increased recovery of liquid hydrocarbons and sulphur from the Waterton Rundle "B" pool)
- Date
- 1965
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Shell Canada Limited, 1965 (acceleration and increased recovery of liquid hydrocarbons and sulphur from the Waterton Rundle "B" pool)
- Date
- 1965
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 2653
- Hearing Panel
- Craig DR
- Lashuk NJ
- Watkins GC
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Enhanced recovery
- Notes
- Examiners report on application requesting approval for a scheme of residual gas injection through the well Waterton No. 12 and through a well to be drilled in LSD.15-4-4-1 W5; applicant asserts that the scheme will increase overall pentanes plus and sulphur recovery.