Print

1470 records – page 1 of 74.

Decision 75-H

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2359
Applicant
Home Oil Company Limited
Alminex Limited
Application Number
7688
Title
Decision on application by Home Oil Company Limited and Alminex Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Part 8)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Home Oil Company Limited and Alminex Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Part 8)
Date
1975
Applicant
Home Oil Company Limited
Alminex Limited
Application Number
7688
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Craig DR
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Athabasca oil sands
Oil mining
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Alberta
Economic analysis
Manufactured crude oil
NTS 74E
Pollution control
Sulphur recovery
Surface mining
Tailings
Oil sands reserve
Waste disposal
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 8
Notes
ERCB report 75-H on application No. 7688 for approval of an oil sands processing plant on lease 30 in TP.94, R.8-11, W4; Board hearing 1974-06-26/27/28
Less detail

Decision 60-06

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2433
Applicant
Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
Application Number
000167 (HEARING)
Title
Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1960 (to recover oil from the tar sands)
Date
1960
Title
Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1960 (to recover oil from the tar sands)
Date
1960
Applicant
Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
Application Number
000167 (HEARING)
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Manyluk AF
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Athabasca oil sands
Great Canadian Oil Sands
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Alberta
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 6A
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S5
Notes
ERCB Report 60-6 on Hearing No. 167 representing the first application for approval of a scheme to produce 11,500,000 barrels per year of synthetic crude oil and other by-products derived from oil sands to be taken from Bituminous Sands lease no. 4; Board Hearing 1960-06-08/09/10 & 1960-07-07/08/09
See also related report no. 62-7
Less detail

Decision 62-07

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2434
Applicant
Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
Application Number
205
Title
Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1962 (to recover oil from the tar sands)
Date
1962
Title
Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1962 (to recover oil from the tar sands)
Date
1962
Applicant
Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
Application Number
205
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Athabasca oil sands
Great Canadian Oil Sands
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Alberta
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 6A
Notes
ERCB Report 62-7 on Hearing No. 205A for commercial recovery of oil sands See related earlier decision 60-6
Less detail

Decision 75-16

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2163
Applicant
Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
Application Number
8641
Title
Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1975 (enlarge scheme area)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1975 (enlarge scheme area)
Date
1975
Applicant
Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
Application Number
8641
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Great Canadian Oil Sands
Oil sands project
Expansion
NTS 74D
Oil sands reserve
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S43
Notes
Decision 75-16 on application No. 8641 to amend approval No. 1944 to include LSD'S 9 through 15 of section 15, TP.92, R.10 W4M in its scheme.
Less detail

Decision 79-H

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2337
Applicant
Alsands Project Group
Application Number
780724
790191
Title
Decision on application by Alsands project group, 1979 (oil sands surface mining and upgrading scheme) Alsands Fort Mcmurray project
Date
1979
Title
Decision on application by Alsands project group, 1979 (oil sands surface mining and upgrading scheme) Alsands Fort Mcmurray project
Date
1979
Applicant
Alsands Project Group
Application Number
780724
790191
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Strom NA
Kupchanko EE
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Alsands project
Electric power project
Oil mining
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Benefit cost analysis
Dragline
Drainage
Electric power plant
Environmental impact
Fluid coking
Gasification
Hot water process
Industrial waste
Land reclamation
McMurray Fm
Mine design
Municipality
NTS 74E
Reclamation
Regional planning
Socio-economic effect
Surface mining
Tailings
Oil sands reserve
Upgrading
Waste disposal
Waste water
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S7
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S43
Notes
ERCB report 79-H on application No. 780724 for oil sands surface mining and upgrading scheme (TP.95-96, R.9-11, W4M) and on application No. 790191 for associated power plan; Board hearing 1979-06-19 thru 1979-07-05; addenda - Jan. 7, 1980 attached; see earlier related Decision ERCB report 74-H
Less detail

Decision 79-A

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2344
Applicant
Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
Application Number
780318
Title
Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, part 8)
Date
1979
Title
Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, part 8)
Date
1979
Applicant
Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
Application Number
780318
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Evans RG
Kupchanko EE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Great Canadian Oil Sands
Oil mining
Suncor plant
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Air quality
Athabasca River
Benefit cost analysis
Delayed coking
Effluent
Emission
Environmental impact
Expansion
Material balance
Mine design
NTS 74E
Open pit mining
Overburden ratio
Plant design
Pollution control
Recovery factor
Socio-economic effect
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Surface mining
Upgrading
Waste disposal
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S43
Notes
ERCB report 79-A on application No. 780318 to amend approval No. 1944 to modify and expand existing facilities located in TP.92-93, R.10, W4M; Board hearing 1979-01-30/31
Less detail

Decision 69-B

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2467
Applicant
Atlantic Richfield Company
Cities Service Athabasca Inc.
Imperial Oil Limited
Royalite Oil Company Limited
Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Title
Decision on application by Atlantic Richfield Company, Cities Service Athabasca Inc., Imperial Oil Limited, Royalite Oil Company Limited, 1969 (to recover oil from the tar sands) supplement
Date
1969
Title
Decision on application by Atlantic Richfield Company, Cities Service Athabasca Inc., Imperial Oil Limited, Royalite Oil Company Limited, 1969 (to recover oil from the tar sands) supplement
Date
1969
Applicant
Atlantic Richfield Company
Cities Service Athabasca Inc.
Imperial Oil Limited
Royalite Oil Company Limited
Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Athabasca oil sands
Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Alberta
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 6A
Notes
Also included in CA2AL-ER-3-D26/NO.60 - 69
Spplement to ERCB report 68-C
Less detail

Decision 63-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2468
Applicant
Cities Service Athabasca Inc.
Imperial Oil Limited
Richfield Oil Corporation
Royalite Oil Company Limited
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
957
219 (Hearing)
1116
220 (Hearing)
Title
Decision on application by cities service Athabasca Inc., and Shell Canada Limited, 1963 (to recover oil from the tar sands)
Date
1963
Title
Decision on application by cities service Athabasca Inc., and Shell Canada Limited, 1963 (to recover oil from the tar sands)
Date
1963
Applicant
Cities Service Athabasca Inc.
Imperial Oil Limited
Richfield Oil Corporation
Royalite Oil Company Limited
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
957
219 (Hearing)
1116
220 (Hearing)
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Manyluk AF
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Athabasca oil sands
Mildred Lake project
Oil sands project
Alberta
Crude oil demand
Economic forecasting
In situ
NTS 74D
NTS 74E
Oil mining
Oil sands oil recovery
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 6A
Notes
ERCB Report 63-8 on application no. 957 (Hearing 219) by Cities Service et al to produce 100,000 barrels per day of synthetic crude oil from Crown Lease No. 17 at Mildred Lake, commencing in 1969 and using a mining and hot water process and on application no. 1116 (Hearing 220) by Shell to product 130,000 barrels of raw crude oil per day from Crown leases No. 26, 42, 45 & 53 in the Namur Lake area of the Athabasca Oil Sands commencing in 1969 and using an in situ thermal recovery process; Board Hearing on Cities Service in Calgary on 1963-01-15/16; Board Hearing on Shell in Calgary on 1963-02-12/13/14; These two applications represent the 2nd and 3rd applications respectively for commercial oil sands schemes.
Less detail

Decision 64-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2496
Applicant
Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
Title
Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1964 (to recover oil from the tar sands)
Date
1964
Title
Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1964 (to recover oil from the tar sands)
Date
1964
Applicant
Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Manyluk AF
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Oil sands oil recovery
Athabasca oil sands
Great Canadian Oil Sands
Alberta
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 6A
Notes
ERCB report 64-3 on application of Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited under Part VI A of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act; Board hearing 1963-10-26 and 1963-10-27
Less detail

Decision 68-C

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2497
Applicant
Atlantic Richfield Company
Cities Service Athabasca Inc.
Imperial Oil Limited
Royalite Oil Company Limited
Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Application Number
4000
Title
Decision on application by Atlantic Richfield Company, Cities Service Athabasca Inc., Imperial Oil Limited, Royalite Oil Company Limited, 1968 (to recover oil from the tar sands)
Date
1968
Title
Decision on application by Atlantic Richfield Company, Cities Service Athabasca Inc., Imperial Oil Limited, Royalite Oil Company Limited, 1968 (to recover oil from the tar sands)
Date
1968
Applicant
Atlantic Richfield Company
Cities Service Athabasca Inc.
Imperial Oil Limited
Royalite Oil Company Limited
Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Application Number
4000
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Manyluk AF
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Athabasca oil sands
Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Alberta
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 6A
Notes
ERCB report 68-C on application proposing production over a 25-year period commencing in 1973, 18,250,000 barrels per year of synthetic crude oil, 9,125,000 barrels per year of specialty oils, and 1,825,000 barrels per year of attendant naptha for L.17, TP.92-93, R.10-12 W4M in bituminous sands area of Alberta; Board prepared to issue approval if applicants satisfy the Board on the mentioned matters and given the further approval of the Lieutenant Governor in Council; Board hearing 1968-06-03, 1968-08-06 to 1986-08-16, and 1986-08-19
also included in CA2AL-ER-3-D26/No. 60-69
Less detail

Decision 59-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2500
Applicant
Alberta Technical Committee
Richfield Oil Corporation
Alberta. Dept. of Mines and Minerals
Title
Decision report 59-05: Report to the Minister of Mines and Minerals and the Oil and Gas Conservation Board with respect to an experiment proposed by Richfield Oil Corporation
Date
1959
Title
Decision report 59-05: Report to the Minister of Mines and Minerals and the Oil and Gas Conservation Board with respect to an experiment proposed by Richfield Oil Corporation
Date
1959
Applicant
Alberta Technical Committee
Richfield Oil Corporation
Alberta. Dept. of Mines and Minerals
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Athabasca oil sands
Nuclear explosion
Project oilsand
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Feasibility
Report
Notes
ERCB report 59-5, although not a report of the Oil and Gas Conservation Board, was distributed by the ERCB (and given an ERCB report number)
Kept behind circulation desk
Related background documents not available
Less detail

Decision 69-C

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2528
Applicant
Atlantic Richfield Company
Cities Service Athabasca Inc.
Imperial Oil Limited
Royalite Oil Company Limited
Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Application Number
4502
Title
Decision on application by Atlantic Richfield Company, Cities Service Athabasca Inc., Imperial Oil Limited, and Royalite Oil Company Limited, 1969 (to produce synthetic crude oil from the tar sands)
Date
1969
Title
Decision on application by Atlantic Richfield Company, Cities Service Athabasca Inc., Imperial Oil Limited, and Royalite Oil Company Limited, 1969 (to produce synthetic crude oil from the tar sands)
Date
1969
Applicant
Atlantic Richfield Company
Cities Service Athabasca Inc.
Imperial Oil Limited
Royalite Oil Company Limited
Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Application Number
4502
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Manyluk AF
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Athabasca oil sands
Manufactured crude oil
Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Alberta
Producing
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 6A
Notes
ERCB Report 69-C on Application No. 4502 for approval of a scheme of operation for the recovery of synthetic crude oil from oil sands in the bituminous sands area of Alberta; Board Hearing 1969-05-26/27
Less detail

Decision 63-07

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2585
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Title
Decision report 63-07: Description and reserve estimate of the oil sands of Alberta
Date
1963
Title
Decision report 63-07: Description and reserve estimate of the oil sands of Alberta
Date
1963
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Oil sands reserve
Oil sands
Athabasca oil sands
Alberta
Reserve estimate
Less detail

Decision 84-26

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1148
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Application Number
831102
Title
Examiners report on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1984 (experimental in situ scheme Lindbergh area)
Date
1984
Title
Examiners report on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1984 (experimental in situ scheme Lindbergh area)
Date
1984
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Application Number
831102
Hearing Panel
Warne GA
Moloney JK
Remmer WG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Carbon dioxide injection
Cyclic steam injection
Elk Point area
In situ
Lindbergh area
Steam injection
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Air quality
Communication
Emission
Environmental impact
Hydrogen sulphide
Noise (sound)
NTS 73E
Pilot scale
Pollution
Sulphur dioxide
Water well
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E84-26 on application No. 831102 for approval of an experimental scheme to cyclicly stimulate 10 existing wells in section 3, TP.56, R.6 W4M using steam and carbon dioxide to evaluate the technical and economic feasibility of this recovery method in the Cold Lake Wabiskaw McMurray oil sands deposit.
Interveners
Shymkiw, J.
Shymkiw, Mrs.J.
Shymkiw, H.
Shymkiw, Mrs.H.
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Less detail

Decision 85-15

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1680
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
840227
Title
Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1985 (commercial oil sands project (phase 1) Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1985 (commercial oil sands project (phase 1) Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
840227
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Carbon dioxide injection
Cyclic steam injection
Elk Point area
Elk Point project
In situ
Industrial plant
Lindbergh field
Steam flooding
Steam injection
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Air quality
Bitumen
Cleaning
Contamination
Disposal well
Emission
Environmental impact
ID-80-02
Hydrogen sulphide
Land reclamation
Land use
Locating
Monitoring
NTS 73E
Noise (sound)
Pollution
Recovery factor
Recycling
Socio-economic effect
Waste disposal
Water disposal
Water supply
Water well
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
Decision D85-15 (with addendum) on application No. 840227 for approval of phase 1 of a three phase commercial oil sands project (Elk Point project) in Lindbergh sector of Cold Lake oil sands deposits, consisting of 13-well cyclic steam and steam flood stimulation project on 2 Hectare well spacing and a 640 CU. M./day bitumen cleaning plant (TP.54-46, R.5-7 W4M); Board hearing 1985-01-08/09/12/15-18/21-23
Interveners
Kadutski, D.
Kadutski, C.
Kadutski, M.
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Keith, L.
Group of Elk Point -Lindbergh Area Residents
Town of Elk Point
County of St. Paul
Westmin Resources Limited
Less detail

Decision 85-06

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1686
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
840739
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Experimental in situ scheme Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Experimental in situ scheme Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
840739
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cyclic steam injection
Elk Point area
In situ
Lindbergh area
Steam injection
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Air quality
Community relations
Cummings Fm
Emission
Environmental impact
Land value
Monitoring
Noise (sound)
NTS 73E
Pilot scale
Pollution
Safety
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
Decision D85-6 on application No. 840739 for approval to develop a 16 well cyclic steam experimental project in the Cummings zone of the Cold Lake Wabiskaw-McMurray oil sands deposit (section 10-56-6 W4M); resulted in approval No. 4448
Interveners
Yaremkevich, D.
Kadutski, D.
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Group of Elk Point-Lindbergh Area Residents
Town of Elk Point
County of Vermillion River
County of St.Paul
Less detail

Decision 84-26

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1699
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
840498
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1984 (Peace River expansion project)
Date
1984
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1984 (Peace River expansion project)
Date
1984
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
840498
Hearing Panel
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cyclic steam injection
In situ
Peace River area
Peace River in situ project
Produced water
Steam flooding
Steam injection
Oil sands project
Oil sands oil recovery
Thermal recovery
Bluesky Fm
Bullhead Gp
Contamination
Environmental impact
Expansion
Groundwater
NTS 84C
Oil producing
Pollution control
Recycling
Socio-economic effect
Water disposal
Water producing
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
Decision D84-26 on application No. 840498 for approval of a commercial scheme involving the expansion OS Shell's current Peace River in situ project under Board approval 2485 (TP.85, R.18, W5M) to recover bitumen from the Peace River Bluesky Bullhead oil sands deposit (Peace River expansion project); Board hearing 1984-09-11/12
Interveners
BP Resources Canada Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Lesser Slave Lake Indian Regional Council
Whitefish Lake Indian Band
Duncan's Band
Lubicon Lake Band
Native Members of the Cree Community of Little Buffalo Lake
Mackenzie Regional Planning Commission
Less detail

Decision 84-24

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1749
Applicant
Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Application Number
840142
Title
Decision on application by Syncrude Canada Ltd., 1984 (new facilities at the Syncrude Mildred Lake oil sands plant)
Date
1984
Title
Decision on application by Syncrude Canada Ltd., 1984 (new facilities at the Syncrude Mildred Lake oil sands plant)
Date
1984
Applicant
Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Application Number
840142
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Bohme VE
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Mildred Lake project
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Air quality
Desulphurization
Emission
Environmental impact
Expansion
Hydrocracking
NTS 74D
NTS 74E
Socio-economic effect
Sulfreen process
Sulphur recovery
Sulphur dioxide
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S14
Notes
Change to legal citation effective January 2011
Decision D84-24 on application No. 840142 to amend approval 2959 to increase production, extend life of project to 2013, modify existing equipment and construct new facilities (capacity addition project); Board hearing 84-08-20/21/24/25; see also addendum to Decision
Interveners
Fort McKay Indian Band
McMurray Manufacturers Association
Fort McMurray Chamber of Commerce
Alberta Trapper's Association
Less detail

Decision 2002-89|2002-89 Addendum

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3548
Applicant
TrueNorth Energy Corporation
Application Number
1096587
2001202
Title
Decision 2002-89: TrueNorth Energy Corporation application to construct and operate an oil sands mine and cogeneration plant in the Fort McMurray area (and addendum)
Date
2002
Title
Decision 2002-89: TrueNorth Energy Corporation application to construct and operate an oil sands mine and cogeneration plant in the Fort McMurray area (and addendum)
Date
2002
Applicant
TrueNorth Energy Corporation
Application Number
1096587
2001202
Hearing Panel
McCrank MN
McGee TM
Nichol JR
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cogeneration
Cumulative impact assessment
Electric power plant
Fort Hills Oil Sands Project
Fort McMurray Area
NTS 83H
Oil sands
Electric substation
Tailings
Water quality
Wetland
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S15
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Oil Sands Conservation Act S11
Notes
EUB Decision on application no. 1096587 pursuant to the Oil Sands Conservation Act for an oil sands mine and bitumen extraction facility located 90 km north of Fort McMurray in Townships 96 and 97, Ranges 9 to 11, West of 4th meridian. Project designed to extract 30 000 m^3 of bitumen/day. Application no. 2001202 under the Hydro and Electric Energy Act for an electric power plant consisting of two 80-MW gas turbine generators and a transmission substation.
Reasons for decision on substation deferred.
Addendum to Decision released October 30, 2002 (attached)
Interveners
Boyd M
Campre A
Campre T
Chabaylo R
Cheng L
Coutu P
Dort-MacLean A
Flexer W
Flobert J
George R
Hoffman Mercredi L
Horton D
Kitagawa M
MacCrimmon G
MacKenzie A
Ng C
Nicholson A
Norton L
Oakes E
Robillard Jones E
Robinson R
Sauve M
Scanie H
Severson-Baker C
St. Jean N
Thomas R
Woodward R
Woynillowicz D
Alberta Council of the Canadian Federation of University Women
Alberta Wilderness Association
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
Cree Burn Lake Preservation Society
Department of Justice Canada
Fort McKay First Nation
Fort McMurray Medical Staff Association
Government of Alberta Minister of Environment
Government of Alberta Minister of Health and Wellness
Government of Alberta Minister of Sustainable Resource Development
Metis Local Number 122
Oil Sands Environmental Coalition
Shell Canada Limited
Suncor Energy Inc.
Syncrude Canada Limited
Wood Buffalo First Nations
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
SUMMARY OF CONDITIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Conditions of Board Approval Recommendations to Alberta
Less detail

Decision 2011-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4445
Applicant
Total E&P Limited
Application Number
1445535
Title
Decision 2011-005 : Total E&P Joslyn Ltd. application for an oil sands mine and bitumen processing facility Joslyn North mine project Fort McMurray area
Date
2011
Title
Decision 2011-005 : Total E&P Joslyn Ltd. application for an oil sands mine and bitumen processing facility Joslyn North mine project Fort McMurray area
Date
2011
Applicant
Total E&P Limited
Application Number
1445535
Hearing Panel
Dilay JD
Ross B
McFadyen D
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Oil sands oil recovery
Bitumen
Oil sands
Directive 074
Environmental impact assessment
Conservation
Environmental impact
Wildlife
Vegetation
Wetland
Water
Fish
History
Paleontology
Land use
Socio-economic effect
Economic development
Noise (sound)
Reclamation
Liability (law)
Tailings - storage
Settling pond
Residential building
Public consultation
Cumulative impact assessment
Legal References
2011 ABERCB 005
Oil Sands Conservation Act S3
Oil Sands Conservation Act S24
Oil Sands Conservation Act S26
Oil Sands Conservation Regulation
Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act
Water Act
Energy Resources Conservation Act
Canadian Environmental Assessment Act
Notes
Report of the joint review panel established by the Federal Minister of the Environment and the Energy Resources Conservation Board
Change to legal citation effective January 2011
Interveners
BP Canada Energy Company
Shell Canada Limited
Syncrude Canada Limited
Belanger F member of the Dene Sioux First Nation
Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo (RMWB)
Oil Sands Environmental Coalition (OSEC)
Mikisew Cree First Nation (MCFN)
Fort McKay First Nation and Metis Nation Local #63 (Fort McKay)
Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation (ACFN)
Non-Status Fort McMurray Band Descendents, and Off-Reserve Fort McMurray Band Descendants
Sierra Club Prairie
Guertin M
Clearwater River Band No. 175
Government of Canada
Government of Alberta
Joint Review Panel (Panel) staff
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
Condition 1 – TOTAL will submit a detailed tailings management plan two years before commencement of operations, and TOTAL will clearly demonstrate its ability to meet all requirements of Directive 074. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 2 – TOTAL will devise methods for measuring fines at the project in accordance with Energy Resources Conservation Board requirements. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 3 – TOTAL will notify the Energy Resources Conservation Board in writing of any proposed pilot plants and/or demonstration plants for all technology development at least six months before construction of those facilities begins. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 4 – TOTAL will provide written updates of any previously submitted test reports by no later than February 28 each year, or as otherwise specified by the Energy Resources Conservation Board. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 5 – TOTAL will not exceed three million cubic metres of fluid in the sand beach area sumps. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 6 – One year prior to plant start-up, TOTAL will privide measurement plans to the Energy Resources Conservation Board for review and approval, including process and instrumentation diagrams, metering, sampling methods, analytical methods and, material balance procedures that satisfy Energy Resources Conservation Board measurement requirements. (Section 5.2.2) Condition 7 – TOTAL will not discharge any untreated froth treatment tailings to the tailings disposal area. (Section 5.3.2) Condition 8 – On an annual average basis, TOTAL will limit site-wide solvent losses to not more than four volumes per thousand volumes of bitumen production under any operating conditions. (Section 5.3.2) Condition 9 – On an annual average basis, TOTAL will limit the amount of asphaltene rejection to 10 mass per cent based on bitumen production. (Section 5.4.2) Condition 10 – TOTAL will submit detailed geotechnical designs for all external overburden disposal areas and reclamation stockpiles to the Energy Resources Conservation Board at least six months prior to conducting any field preparation in these areas. (Section 5.5.3) Condition 11 – TOTAL will submit to the Energy Resources Conservation Board, for its review and approval, detailed geotechnical designs and setback distances for critical infrastructure two years prior to site preparation activities for the ore preparation plant pit, the west and southern final pitwall, and for the final pitwall design and assessed setback from the Ells River. (Section 5.5.3) Condition 12 – TOTAL will provide Alberta Environment with a wildlife mitigation plan for approval prior to clearing any vegetation. The plan must achieve no net significant adverse effect on species at risk and deal with mitigating impacts to not only species at risk, but also valued wildlife. (Section 6.1.3) Condition 13 – TOTAL will monitor noise levels at James Grandejambe’s cabin. Should noise levels exceed those outlined in Directive 038, TOTAL will ensure that mitigation measures are implemented and that Directive 038 compliance is met. (Section 9.6.3) Condition 14 – TOTAL will maintain unimpeded access required for stakeholders to areas west of the project until the Moose Lake access management plan, or an equivalent, is implemented. (Section 9.7.3) Condition 15 – TOTAL will actively support and participate in the Cumulative Environmental Management Association and other regional committees to develop and use its strategies to mitigate both development and regional cumulative environmental effects. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 16 – TOTAL will limit the area of disturbance to 5000 hectares or less. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 17 – TOTAL will remove all benching on mine discard structures prior to reclaiming them. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 18 – TOTAL will provide sustainable watershed designs with vegetated watercourses for geotechnical design applications for mine discard structures. Landform watershed designs should be consistent with regionally recognized guidelines for the purpose of erosion management. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 19 – TOTAL will provide an amended mine plan to demonstrate an integrated landform and landscape design for the Canadian Natural Resources Limited – TOTAL common mine boundary to the Energy Resources Conservation Board for approval five years prior to development. The amended plan must include a discussion of the feasibility of filling the trench area between the Joslyn North and Horizon projects with mine discard. The plan must also include a discussion of the alternatives considered by TOTAL. (Section 10.2.3) Condition 20 – TOTAL will submit an annual report to the Energy Resources Conservation Board, starting two years prior to commencing mining operations, that describes its end pit lake research and development efforts for the previous year, and the current plans and timelines for determining the efficacy of its end pit lake within seven years of mine closure. This report will include all of TOTAL’s efforts and contributions with respect to collaboration on the demonstration of a full scale end pit lake. (Section 12.3)
Less detail

1470 records – page 1 of 74.