Narrow Results By
Applicant
- AEC Oil & Gas Co. Ltd. 34
- AEC West Ltd. 9
- Aberford Resources Ltd. 1
- Alberta Department of Energy 1
- Alberta Energy Company Ltd. 9
- Alberta Energy and Utilities Board 1
- Alberta Oil Sands Technology and Research Authority 4
- Alberta Technical Committee 1
- Alberta. Dept. of Mines and Minerals 1
- Alberta. Dept. of the Environment 1
- Albian Sands Energy Inc. 1
- Albion Petroleum Corporation Limited 1
Year
- 2019 3
- 2018 5
- 2017 3
- 2014 2
- 2013 4
- 2012 5
- 2011 3
- 2010 3
- 2009 3
- 2008 3
- 2007 4
- 2006 3
- 2005 2
- 2004 6
- 2003 3
- 2002 1
- 2001 45
- 2000 94
- 1999 105
- 1998 42
- 1997 69
- 1996 82
- 1995 52
- 1994 25
- 1993 41
- 1992 35
- 1991 25
- 1990 35
- 1989 23
- 1988 36
- 1987 49
- 1986 47
- 1985 75
- 1984 84
- 1983 54
- 1982 54
- 1981 45
- 1980 38
- 1979 31
- 1978 16
- 1977 21
- 1976 21
- 1975 16
- 1974 19
- 1973 17
- 1972 8
- 1971 3
- 1970 1
- 1969 7
- 1968 12
- 1967 15
- 1966 13
- 1965 13
- 1964 9
- 1963 11
- 1962 8
- 1961 2
- 1960 11
- 1959 1
Decision 75-H
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2359
- Applicant
- Home Oil Company Limited
- Alminex Limited
- Application Number
- 7688
- Title
- Decision on application by Home Oil Company Limited and Alminex Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Part 8)
- Date
- 1975
- Title
- Decision on application by Home Oil Company Limited and Alminex Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Part 8)
- Date
- 1975
- Applicant
- Home Oil Company Limited
- Alminex Limited
- Application Number
- 7688
- Hearing Panel
- Govier GW
- Craig DR
- Millard V
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Athabasca oil sands
- Oil mining
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Alberta
- Economic analysis
- Manufactured crude oil
- NTS 74E
- Pollution control
- Sulphur recovery
- Surface mining
- Tailings
- Oil sands reserve
- Waste disposal
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 8
- Notes
- ERCB report 75-H on application No. 7688 for approval of an oil sands processing plant on lease 30 in TP.94, R.8-11, W4; Board hearing 1974-06-26/27/28
Decision 60-06
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2433
- Applicant
- Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
- Application Number
- 000167 (HEARING)
- Title
- Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1960 (to recover oil from the tar sands)
- Date
- 1960
- Title
- Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1960 (to recover oil from the tar sands)
- Date
- 1960
- Applicant
- Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
- Application Number
- 000167 (HEARING)
- Hearing Panel
- Govier GW
- Manyluk AF
- Millard V
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Athabasca oil sands
- Great Canadian Oil Sands
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Alberta
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 6A
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S5
- Notes
- ERCB Report 60-6 on Hearing No. 167 representing the first application for approval of a scheme to produce 11,500,000 barrels per year of synthetic crude oil and other by-products derived from oil sands to be taken from Bituminous Sands lease no. 4; Board Hearing 1960-06-08/09/10 & 1960-07-07/08/09
- See also related report no. 62-7
Decision 62-07
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2434
- Applicant
- Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
- Application Number
- 205
- Title
- Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1962 (to recover oil from the tar sands)
- Date
- 1962
- Title
- Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1962 (to recover oil from the tar sands)
- Date
- 1962
- Applicant
- Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
- Application Number
- 205
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Athabasca oil sands
- Great Canadian Oil Sands
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Alberta
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 6A
- Notes
- ERCB Report 62-7 on Hearing No. 205A for commercial recovery of oil sands See related earlier decision 60-6
Decision 75-16
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2163
- Applicant
- Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
- Application Number
- 8641
- Title
- Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1975 (enlarge scheme area)
- Date
- 1975
- Title
- Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1975 (enlarge scheme area)
- Date
- 1975
- Applicant
- Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
- Application Number
- 8641
- Hearing Panel
- Craig DR
- DeSorcy GJ
- Bohme VE
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S43
- Notes
- Decision 75-16 on application No. 8641 to amend approval No. 1944 to include LSD'S 9 through 15 of section 15, TP.92, R.10 W4M in its scheme.
Decision 79-H
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2337
- Applicant
- Alsands Project Group
- Application Number
- 780724
- 790191
- Title
- Decision on application by Alsands project group, 1979 (oil sands surface mining and upgrading scheme) Alsands Fort Mcmurray project
- Date
- 1979
- Title
- Decision on application by Alsands project group, 1979 (oil sands surface mining and upgrading scheme) Alsands Fort Mcmurray project
- Date
- 1979
- Applicant
- Alsands Project Group
- Application Number
- 780724
- 790191
- Hearing Panel
- Berkowitz N
- Strom NA
- Kupchanko EE
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Utilities
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Alsands project
- Electric power project
- Oil mining
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Benefit cost analysis
- Dragline
- Drainage
- Electric power plant
- Environmental impact
- Fluid coking
- Gasification
- Hot water process
- Industrial waste
- Land reclamation
- McMurray Fm
- Mine design
- Municipality
- NTS 74E
- Reclamation
- Regional planning
- Socio-economic effect
- Surface mining
- Tailings
- Oil sands reserve
- Upgrading
- Waste disposal
- Waste water
- Legal References
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S7
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S43
- Notes
- ERCB report 79-H on application No. 780724 for oil sands surface mining and upgrading scheme (TP.95-96, R.9-11, W4M) and on application No. 790191 for associated power plan; Board hearing 1979-06-19 thru 1979-07-05; addenda - Jan. 7, 1980 attached; see earlier related Decision ERCB report 74-H
Decision 79-A
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2344
- Applicant
- Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
- Application Number
- 780318
- Title
- Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, part 8)
- Date
- 1979
- Title
- Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, part 8)
- Date
- 1979
- Applicant
- Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
- Application Number
- 780318
- Hearing Panel
- Bohme VE
- Evans RG
- Kupchanko EE
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Great Canadian Oil Sands
- Oil mining
- Suncor plant
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Air quality
- Athabasca River
- Benefit cost analysis
- Delayed coking
- Effluent
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Expansion
- Material balance
- Mine design
- NTS 74E
- Open pit mining
- Overburden ratio
- Plant design
- Pollution control
- Recovery factor
- Socio-economic effect
- Sulphur dioxide
- Sulphur recovery
- Surface mining
- Upgrading
- Waste disposal
- Water quality
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S43
- Notes
- ERCB report 79-A on application No. 780318 to amend approval No. 1944 to modify and expand existing facilities located in TP.92-93, R.10, W4M; Board hearing 1979-01-30/31
Decision 69-B
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2467
- Applicant
- Atlantic Richfield Company
- Cities Service Athabasca Inc.
- Imperial Oil Limited
- Royalite Oil Company Limited
- Syncrude Canada Ltd.
- Title
- Decision on application by Atlantic Richfield Company, Cities Service Athabasca Inc., Imperial Oil Limited, Royalite Oil Company Limited, 1969 (to recover oil from the tar sands) supplement
- Date
- 1969
- Title
- Decision on application by Atlantic Richfield Company, Cities Service Athabasca Inc., Imperial Oil Limited, Royalite Oil Company Limited, 1969 (to recover oil from the tar sands) supplement
- Date
- 1969
- Applicant
- Atlantic Richfield Company
- Cities Service Athabasca Inc.
- Imperial Oil Limited
- Royalite Oil Company Limited
- Syncrude Canada Ltd.
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Athabasca oil sands
- Syncrude Canada Ltd.
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Alberta
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 6A
- Notes
- Also included in CA2AL-ER-3-D26/NO.60 - 69
- Spplement to ERCB report 68-C
Decision 63-08
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2468
- Applicant
- Cities Service Athabasca Inc.
- Imperial Oil Limited
- Richfield Oil Corporation
- Royalite Oil Company Limited
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 957
- 219 (Hearing)
- 1116
- 220 (Hearing)
- Title
- Decision on application by cities service Athabasca Inc., and Shell Canada Limited, 1963 (to recover oil from the tar sands)
- Date
- 1963
- Title
- Decision on application by cities service Athabasca Inc., and Shell Canada Limited, 1963 (to recover oil from the tar sands)
- Date
- 1963
- Applicant
- Cities Service Athabasca Inc.
- Imperial Oil Limited
- Richfield Oil Corporation
- Royalite Oil Company Limited
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 957
- 219 (Hearing)
- 1116
- 220 (Hearing)
- Hearing Panel
- Govier GW
- Manyluk AF
- Millard V
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Athabasca oil sands
- Mildred Lake project
- Oil sands project
- Alberta
- Crude oil demand
- Economic forecasting
- In situ
- NTS 74D
- NTS 74E
- Oil mining
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 6A
- Notes
- ERCB Report 63-8 on application no. 957 (Hearing 219) by Cities Service et al to produce 100,000 barrels per day of synthetic crude oil from Crown Lease No. 17 at Mildred Lake, commencing in 1969 and using a mining and hot water process and on application no. 1116 (Hearing 220) by Shell to product 130,000 barrels of raw crude oil per day from Crown leases No. 26, 42, 45 & 53 in the Namur Lake area of the Athabasca Oil Sands commencing in 1969 and using an in situ thermal recovery process; Board Hearing on Cities Service in Calgary on 1963-01-15/16; Board Hearing on Shell in Calgary on 1963-02-12/13/14; These two applications represent the 2nd and 3rd applications respectively for commercial oil sands schemes.
Decision 64-03
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2496
- Applicant
- Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
- Title
- Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1964 (to recover oil from the tar sands)
- Date
- 1964
- Title
- Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1964 (to recover oil from the tar sands)
- Date
- 1964
- Applicant
- Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
- Hearing Panel
- Govier GW
- Manyluk AF
- Millard V
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 6A
- Notes
- ERCB report 64-3 on application of Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited under Part VI A of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act; Board hearing 1963-10-26 and 1963-10-27
Decision 68-C
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2497
- Applicant
- Atlantic Richfield Company
- Cities Service Athabasca Inc.
- Imperial Oil Limited
- Royalite Oil Company Limited
- Syncrude Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 4000
- Title
- Decision on application by Atlantic Richfield Company, Cities Service Athabasca Inc., Imperial Oil Limited, Royalite Oil Company Limited, 1968 (to recover oil from the tar sands)
- Date
- 1968
- Title
- Decision on application by Atlantic Richfield Company, Cities Service Athabasca Inc., Imperial Oil Limited, Royalite Oil Company Limited, 1968 (to recover oil from the tar sands)
- Date
- 1968
- Applicant
- Atlantic Richfield Company
- Cities Service Athabasca Inc.
- Imperial Oil Limited
- Royalite Oil Company Limited
- Syncrude Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 4000
- Hearing Panel
- Govier GW
- Manyluk AF
- Millard V
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Athabasca oil sands
- Syncrude Canada Ltd.
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Alberta
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 6A
- Notes
- ERCB report 68-C on application proposing production over a 25-year period commencing in 1973, 18,250,000 barrels per year of synthetic crude oil, 9,125,000 barrels per year of specialty oils, and 1,825,000 barrels per year of attendant naptha for L.17, TP.92-93, R.10-12 W4M in bituminous sands area of Alberta; Board prepared to issue approval if applicants satisfy the Board on the mentioned matters and given the further approval of the Lieutenant Governor in Council; Board hearing 1968-06-03, 1968-08-06 to 1986-08-16, and 1986-08-19
- also included in CA2AL-ER-3-D26/No. 60-69
Decision 59-05
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2500
- Applicant
- Alberta Technical Committee
- Richfield Oil Corporation
- Alberta. Dept. of Mines and Minerals
- Title
- Decision report 59-05: Report to the Minister of Mines and Minerals and the Oil and Gas Conservation Board with respect to an experiment proposed by Richfield Oil Corporation
- Date
- 1959
- Title
- Decision report 59-05: Report to the Minister of Mines and Minerals and the Oil and Gas Conservation Board with respect to an experiment proposed by Richfield Oil Corporation
- Date
- 1959
- Applicant
- Alberta Technical Committee
- Richfield Oil Corporation
- Alberta. Dept. of Mines and Minerals
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Athabasca oil sands
- Nuclear explosion
- Project oilsand
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Thermal recovery
- Feasibility
- Report
- Notes
- ERCB report 59-5, although not a report of the Oil and Gas Conservation Board, was distributed by the ERCB (and given an ERCB report number)
- Kept behind circulation desk
- Related background documents not available
Decision 69-C
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2528
- Applicant
- Atlantic Richfield Company
- Cities Service Athabasca Inc.
- Imperial Oil Limited
- Royalite Oil Company Limited
- Syncrude Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 4502
- Title
- Decision on application by Atlantic Richfield Company, Cities Service Athabasca Inc., Imperial Oil Limited, and Royalite Oil Company Limited, 1969 (to produce synthetic crude oil from the tar sands)
- Date
- 1969
- Title
- Decision on application by Atlantic Richfield Company, Cities Service Athabasca Inc., Imperial Oil Limited, and Royalite Oil Company Limited, 1969 (to produce synthetic crude oil from the tar sands)
- Date
- 1969
- Applicant
- Atlantic Richfield Company
- Cities Service Athabasca Inc.
- Imperial Oil Limited
- Royalite Oil Company Limited
- Syncrude Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 4502
- Hearing Panel
- Govier GW
- Manyluk AF
- Millard V
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Athabasca oil sands
- Manufactured crude oil
- Syncrude Canada Ltd.
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Alberta
- Producing
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 6A
- Notes
- ERCB Report 69-C on Application No. 4502 for approval of a scheme of operation for the recovery of synthetic crude oil from oil sands in the bituminous sands area of Alberta; Board Hearing 1969-05-26/27
Decision 63-07
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2585
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Title
- Decision report 63-07: Description and reserve estimate of the oil sands of Alberta
- Date
- 1963
- Title
- Decision report 63-07: Description and reserve estimate of the oil sands of Alberta
- Date
- 1963
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Category
- Oil sands
Decision 84-26
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1148
- Applicant
- PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 831102
- Title
- Examiners report on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1984 (experimental in situ scheme Lindbergh area)
- Date
- 1984
- Title
- Examiners report on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1984 (experimental in situ scheme Lindbergh area)
- Date
- 1984
- Applicant
- PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 831102
- Hearing Panel
- Warne GA
- Moloney JK
- Remmer WG
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Carbon dioxide injection
- Cyclic steam injection
- Elk Point area
- In situ
- Lindbergh area
- Steam injection
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Thermal recovery
- Air quality
- Communication
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Hydrogen sulphide
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 73E
- Pilot scale
- Pollution
- Sulphur dioxide
- Water well
- Legal References
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
- Notes
- ERCB Examiners report E84-26 on application No. 831102 for approval of an experimental scheme to cyclicly stimulate 10 existing wells in section 3, TP.56, R.6 W4M using steam and carbon dioxide to evaluate the technical and economic feasibility of this recovery method in the Cold Lake Wabiskaw McMurray oil sands deposit.
- Interveners
- Shymkiw, J.
- Shymkiw, Mrs.J.
- Shymkiw, H.
- Shymkiw, Mrs.H.
- Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Decision 85-15
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1680
- Applicant
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
- Application Number
- 840227
- Title
- Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1985 (commercial oil sands project (phase 1) Lindbergh sector)
- Date
- 1985
- Title
- Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1985 (commercial oil sands project (phase 1) Lindbergh sector)
- Date
- 1985
- Applicant
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
- Application Number
- 840227
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Strom NA
- Bellows LA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Carbon dioxide injection
- Cyclic steam injection
- Elk Point area
- Elk Point project
- In situ
- Industrial plant
- Lindbergh field
- Steam flooding
- Steam injection
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Thermal recovery
- Air quality
- Bitumen
- Cleaning
- Contamination
- Disposal well
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- ID-80-02
- Hydrogen sulphide
- Land reclamation
- Land use
- Locating
- Monitoring
- NTS 73E
- Noise (sound)
- Pollution
- Recovery factor
- Recycling
- Socio-economic effect
- Waste disposal
- Water disposal
- Water supply
- Water well
- Well spacing
- Legal References
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
- Notes
- Decision D85-15 (with addendum) on application No. 840227 for approval of phase 1 of a three phase commercial oil sands project (Elk Point project) in Lindbergh sector of Cold Lake oil sands deposits, consisting of 13-well cyclic steam and steam flood stimulation project on 2 Hectare well spacing and a 640 CU. M./day bitumen cleaning plant (TP.54-46, R.5-7 W4M); Board hearing 1985-01-08/09/12/15-18/21-23
- Interveners
- Kadutski, D.
- Kadutski, C.
- Kadutski, M.
- Elk Point Surface Rights Association
- Keith, L.
- Group of Elk Point -Lindbergh Area Residents
- Town of Elk Point
- County of St. Paul
- Westmin Resources Limited
Decision 85-06
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1686
- Applicant
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 840739
- Title
- Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Experimental in situ scheme Lindbergh sector)
- Date
- 1985
- Title
- Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Experimental in situ scheme Lindbergh sector)
- Date
- 1985
- Applicant
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 840739
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Strom NA
- Bellows LA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Cyclic steam injection
- Elk Point area
- In situ
- Lindbergh area
- Steam injection
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Thermal recovery
- Air quality
- Community relations
- Cummings Fm
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Land value
- Monitoring
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 73E
- Pilot scale
- Pollution
- Safety
- Well spacing
- Legal References
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
- Notes
- Decision D85-6 on application No. 840739 for approval to develop a 16 well cyclic steam experimental project in the Cummings zone of the Cold Lake Wabiskaw-McMurray oil sands deposit (section 10-56-6 W4M); resulted in approval No. 4448
- Interveners
- Yaremkevich, D.
- Kadutski, D.
- Elk Point Surface Rights Association
- Group of Elk Point-Lindbergh Area Residents
- Town of Elk Point
- County of Vermillion River
- County of St.Paul
Decision 84-26
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1699
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Resources Limited
- Application Number
- 840498
- Title
- Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1984 (Peace River expansion project)
- Date
- 1984
- Title
- Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1984 (Peace River expansion project)
- Date
- 1984
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Resources Limited
- Application Number
- 840498
- Hearing Panel
- Strom NA
- Bellows LA
- Mink FJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Cyclic steam injection
- In situ
- Peace River area
- Peace River in situ project
- Produced water
- Steam flooding
- Steam injection
- Oil sands project
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Thermal recovery
- Bluesky Fm
- Bullhead Gp
- Contamination
- Environmental impact
- Expansion
- Groundwater
- NTS 84C
- Oil producing
- Pollution control
- Recycling
- Socio-economic effect
- Water disposal
- Water producing
- Well spacing
- Legal References
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
- Notes
- Decision D84-26 on application No. 840498 for approval of a commercial scheme involving the expansion OS Shell's current Peace River in situ project under Board approval 2485 (TP.85, R.18, W5M) to recover bitumen from the Peace River Bluesky Bullhead oil sands deposit (Peace River expansion project); Board hearing 1984-09-11/12
- Interveners
- BP Resources Canada Limited
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Lesser Slave Lake Indian Regional Council
- Whitefish Lake Indian Band
- Duncan's Band
- Lubicon Lake Band
- Native Members of the Cree Community of Little Buffalo Lake
- Mackenzie Regional Planning Commission
Decision 84-24
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1749
- Applicant
- Syncrude Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 840142
- Title
- Decision on application by Syncrude Canada Ltd., 1984 (new facilities at the Syncrude Mildred Lake oil sands plant)
- Date
- 1984
- Title
- Decision on application by Syncrude Canada Ltd., 1984 (new facilities at the Syncrude Mildred Lake oil sands plant)
- Date
- 1984
- Applicant
- Syncrude Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 840142
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- Bohme VE
- Strom NA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Mildred Lake project
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Air quality
- Desulphurization
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Expansion
- Hydrocracking
- NTS 74D
- NTS 74E
- Socio-economic effect
- Sulfreen process
- Sulphur recovery
- Sulphur dioxide
- Legal References
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S14
- Notes
- Change to legal citation effective January 2011
- Decision D84-24 on application No. 840142 to amend approval 2959 to increase production, extend life of project to 2013, modify existing equipment and construct new facilities (capacity addition project); Board hearing 84-08-20/21/24/25; see also addendum to Decision
- Interveners
- Fort McKay Indian Band
- McMurray Manufacturers Association
- Fort McMurray Chamber of Commerce
- Alberta Trapper's Association
Decision 2002-89|2002-89 Addendum
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3548
- Applicant
- TrueNorth Energy Corporation
- Application Number
- 1096587
- 2001202
- Title
- Decision 2002-89: TrueNorth Energy Corporation application to construct and operate an oil sands mine and cogeneration plant in the Fort McMurray area (and addendum)
- Date
- 2002
- Title
- Decision 2002-89: TrueNorth Energy Corporation application to construct and operate an oil sands mine and cogeneration plant in the Fort McMurray area (and addendum)
- Date
- 2002
- Applicant
- TrueNorth Energy Corporation
- Application Number
- 1096587
- 2001202
- Hearing Panel
- McCrank MN
- McGee TM
- Nichol JR
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Utilities
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Cogeneration
- Cumulative impact assessment
- Electric power plant
- Fort Hills Oil Sands Project
- Fort McMurray Area
- NTS 83H
- Oil sands
- Electric substation
- Tailings
- Water quality
- Wetland
- Legal References
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S15
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S11
- Notes
- EUB Decision on application no. 1096587 pursuant to the Oil Sands Conservation Act for an oil sands mine and bitumen extraction facility located 90 km north of Fort McMurray in Townships 96 and 97, Ranges 9 to 11, West of 4th meridian. Project designed to extract 30 000 m^3 of bitumen/day. Application no. 2001202 under the Hydro and Electric Energy Act for an electric power plant consisting of two 80-MW gas turbine generators and a transmission substation.
- Reasons for decision on substation deferred.
- Addendum to Decision released October 30, 2002 (attached)
- Interveners
- Boyd M
- Campre A
- Campre T
- Chabaylo R
- Cheng L
- Coutu P
- Dort-MacLean A
- Flexer W
- Flobert J
- George R
- Hoffman Mercredi L
- Horton D
- Kitagawa M
- MacCrimmon G
- MacKenzie A
- Ng C
- Nicholson A
- Norton L
- Oakes E
- Robillard Jones E
- Robinson R
- Sauve M
- Scanie H
- Severson-Baker C
- St. Jean N
- Thomas R
- Woodward R
- Woynillowicz D
- Alberta Council of the Canadian Federation of University Women
- Alberta Wilderness Association
- Canadian Natural Resources Limited
- Cree Burn Lake Preservation Society
- Department of Justice Canada
- Fort McKay First Nation
- Fort McMurray Medical Staff Association
- Government of Alberta Minister of Environment
- Government of Alberta Minister of Health and Wellness
- Government of Alberta Minister of Sustainable Resource Development
- Metis Local Number 122
- Oil Sands Environmental Coalition
- Shell Canada Limited
- Suncor Energy Inc.
- Syncrude Canada Limited
- Wood Buffalo First Nations
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- SUMMARY OF CONDITIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Conditions of Board Approval Recommendations to Alberta
Decision 2011-05
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4445
- Applicant
- Total E&P Limited
- Application Number
- 1445535
- Title
- Decision 2011-005 : Total E&P Joslyn Ltd. application for an oil sands mine and bitumen processing facility Joslyn North mine project Fort McMurray area
- Date
- 2011
- Title
- Decision 2011-005 : Total E&P Joslyn Ltd. application for an oil sands mine and bitumen processing facility Joslyn North mine project Fort McMurray area
- Date
- 2011
- Applicant
- Total E&P Limited
- Application Number
- 1445535
- Hearing Panel
- Dilay JD
- Ross B
- McFadyen D
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Bitumen
- Oil sands
- Directive 074
- Environmental impact assessment
- Conservation
- Environmental impact
- Wildlife
- Vegetation
- Wetland
- Water
- Fish
- History
- Paleontology
- Land use
- Socio-economic effect
- Economic development
- Noise (sound)
- Reclamation
- Liability (law)
- Tailings - storage
- Settling pond
- Residential building
- Public consultation
- Cumulative impact assessment
- Legal References
- 2011 ABERCB 005
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S3
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S24
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S26
- Oil Sands Conservation Regulation
- Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act
- Water Act
- Energy Resources Conservation Act
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act
- Notes
- Report of the joint review panel established by the Federal Minister of the Environment and the Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Change to legal citation effective January 2011
- Interveners
- BP Canada Energy Company
- Shell Canada Limited
- Syncrude Canada Limited
- Belanger F member of the Dene Sioux First Nation
- Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo (RMWB)
- Oil Sands Environmental Coalition (OSEC)
- Mikisew Cree First Nation (MCFN)
- Fort McKay First Nation and Metis Nation Local #63 (Fort McKay)
- Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation (ACFN)
- Non-Status Fort McMurray Band Descendents, and Off-Reserve Fort McMurray Band Descendants
- Sierra Club Prairie
- Guertin M
- Clearwater River Band No. 175
- Government of Canada
- Government of Alberta
- Joint Review Panel (Panel) staff
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- Condition 1 – TOTAL will submit a detailed tailings management plan two years before commencement of operations, and TOTAL will clearly demonstrate its ability to meet all requirements of Directive 074. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 2 – TOTAL will devise methods for measuring fines at the project in accordance with Energy Resources Conservation Board requirements. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 3 – TOTAL will notify the Energy Resources Conservation Board in writing of any proposed pilot plants and/or demonstration plants for all technology development at least six months before construction of those facilities begins. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 4 – TOTAL will provide written updates of any previously submitted test reports by no later than February 28 each year, or as otherwise specified by the Energy Resources Conservation Board. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 5 – TOTAL will not exceed three million cubic metres of fluid in the sand beach area sumps. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 6 – One year prior to plant start-up, TOTAL will privide measurement plans to the Energy Resources Conservation Board for review and approval, including process and instrumentation diagrams, metering, sampling methods, analytical methods and, material balance procedures that satisfy Energy Resources Conservation Board measurement requirements. (Section 5.2.2) Condition 7 – TOTAL will not discharge any untreated froth treatment tailings to the tailings disposal area. (Section 5.3.2) Condition 8 – On an annual average basis, TOTAL will limit site-wide solvent losses to not more than four volumes per thousand volumes of bitumen production under any operating conditions. (Section 5.3.2) Condition 9 – On an annual average basis, TOTAL will limit the amount of asphaltene rejection to 10 mass per cent based on bitumen production. (Section 5.4.2) Condition 10 – TOTAL will submit detailed geotechnical designs for all external overburden disposal areas and reclamation stockpiles to the Energy Resources Conservation Board at least six months prior to conducting any field preparation in these areas. (Section 5.5.3) Condition 11 – TOTAL will submit to the Energy Resources Conservation Board, for its review and approval, detailed geotechnical designs and setback distances for critical infrastructure two years prior to site preparation activities for the ore preparation plant pit, the west and southern final pitwall, and for the final pitwall design and assessed setback from the Ells River. (Section 5.5.3) Condition 12 – TOTAL will provide Alberta Environment with a wildlife mitigation plan for approval prior to clearing any vegetation. The plan must achieve no net significant adverse effect on species at risk and deal with mitigating impacts to not only species at risk, but also valued wildlife. (Section 6.1.3) Condition 13 – TOTAL will monitor noise levels at James Grandejambe’s cabin. Should noise levels exceed those outlined in Directive 038, TOTAL will ensure that mitigation measures are implemented and that Directive 038 compliance is met. (Section 9.6.3) Condition 14 – TOTAL will maintain unimpeded access required for stakeholders to areas west of the project until the Moose Lake access management plan, or an equivalent, is implemented. (Section 9.7.3) Condition 15 – TOTAL will actively support and participate in the Cumulative Environmental Management Association and other regional committees to develop and use its strategies to mitigate both development and regional cumulative environmental effects. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 16 – TOTAL will limit the area of disturbance to 5000 hectares or less. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 17 – TOTAL will remove all benching on mine discard structures prior to reclaiming them. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 18 – TOTAL will provide sustainable watershed designs with vegetated watercourses for geotechnical design applications for mine discard structures. Landform watershed designs should be consistent with regionally recognized guidelines for the purpose of erosion management. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 19 – TOTAL will provide an amended mine plan to demonstrate an integrated landform and landscape design for the Canadian Natural Resources Limited – TOTAL common mine boundary to the Energy Resources Conservation Board for approval five years prior to development. The amended plan must include a discussion of the feasibility of filling the trench area between the Joslyn North and Horizon projects with mine discard. The plan must also include a discussion of the alternatives considered by TOTAL. (Section 10.2.3) Condition 20 – TOTAL will submit an annual report to the Energy Resources Conservation Board, starting two years prior to commencing mining operations, that describes its end pit lake research and development efforts for the previous year, and the current plans and timelines for determining the efficacy of its end pit lake within seven years of mine closure. This report will include all of TOTAL’s efforts and contributions with respect to collaboration on the demonstration of a full scale end pit lake. (Section 12.3)