50 records – page 1 of 3.

Decision 75-13

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2166
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
8597
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited and Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1975 (For permit to construct an oil line for the transmission of propane butanes and pentanes plus from the Candel Minnehik-Buck Lake gas plant)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited and Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1975 (For permit to construct an oil line for the transmission of propane butanes and pentanes plus from the Candel Minnehik-Buck Lake gas plant)
Date
1975
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
8597
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Butane
Liquefied natural gas
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Pentanes plus
Propane
Environmental impact
Legal References
Pipeline Act Part 2
Notes
Decision 75-13 on application No. 8597 to construct an oil pipeline to transport propane, butanes and pentanes plus from the Candel Minnehik-Buck Lake gas plant to the existing Cochrane to Edmonton pipeline; Board hearing 1975-08-28; adjourned to 1975-09-09
Interveners
CanDel Oil Ltd.
Goliad Oil & Gas Company
Pembina Pipe Line Ltd.
M.L.A. for Drayton Valley
Less detail

Decision 76-11

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2153
Applicant
Alberta Oil Sands Pipeline Ltd.
Application Number
9138
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Oil Sands Pipeline Ltd., 1976 (oil line from Fort McMurray to Edmonton)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Oil Sands Pipeline Ltd., 1976 (oil line from Fort McMurray to Edmonton)
Date
1976
Applicant
Alberta Oil Sands Pipeline Ltd.
Application Number
9138
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Berkowitz N
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Fort McMurray area
Manufactured crude oil
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Mildred Lake project
NTS 74D
NTS 83H
NTS 83I
NTS 83P
Pipeline route
Route selection
Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Transportation corridor
Legal References
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
Decision 76-11 on application No. 9138 to construct an oil line to transport synthetic crude from Syncrude's Mildred Lake plant to the interprovincial pipeline terminal in Edmonton.
Interveners
Albersun Pipeline Ltd.
CU Engineering Limited
Less detail

Decision 77-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2143
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
9608
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (permit to construct a pipeline from red deer to Fort Saskatchewan, part 1)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (permit to construct a pipeline from red deer to Fort Saskatchewan, part 1)
Date
1977
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
9608
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Butane
Ethane
Fort Saskatchewan area
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Pentanes plus
Propane
Red Deer area
NTS 83A
NTS 83H
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 77-5 on application No. 9608 to construct an oil line to transport ethane, propane, butanes and pentanes plus from the age plant under construction near Joffre and from Dome's Edmonton liquid gas plant to storage and eventual delivery to the Cochin pipeline at Fort Saskatchewan; Board hearing 1977-02-09 reconvened 1977-03-08; see also Decision 77-06
Interveners
The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Aristocrat Holdings Ltd.
The Battle River Regional Planning Commission
Dow Chemical of Canda Limited
Hampson, C.G.
Harmin Farms
Mayer, H.
Paley, M.
Heppner, E.
Heppner, L.W.
Heppner, M.M.
Heppner, E.A.
Heppner, M.M.R.
Chimer, W.
Cathton Holdings Ltd.
Fenske, W.A.
Lengert, H.
Lentz, C.
Madison Development Corporation Ltd.
Opaninski, B
Opalinski, T.
Yaskowich, J
Ziobro, S.
Shell Canada Resources Limited
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Kataleen, A.Y.
Less detail

Decision 77-06

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2142
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
9608
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (permit to construct a pipeline from Red Deer To Fort Saskatchewan, part 2)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (permit to construct a pipeline from Red Deer To Fort Saskatchewan, part 2)
Date
1977
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
9608
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Butane
Ethane
Fort Saskatchewan area
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Pentanes plus
Propane
NTS 83H
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 77-6 on application No. 9608 to construct a pipeline to transport ethane, propane, butanes and pentanes PLU Board hearing 1977-02-09 reconvened 1977-03-08 see also Decision 77-5 for part 1
Interveners
The Alberta Gas Ethelene Company Ltd.
Aristocrat Holdings Ltd.
The Battle River Regional Planning Commission
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Hampson, C.G.
Harmin Farms
Mayer, H.
Paley, M.
Heppner, E.
Heppner, L.W.
Heppner, M.M.
Heppner, E.A.
Heppner, M.R.
Chimera, W.
Cathton Holdings Ltd.
Fenske, W.A.
Lengert, H.
Lentz, C.
Madison Development Corporation Ltd.
Opalinski, B.
Opalinski, J.
Yaskowich, J.
Ziobro, S.
Shell Canada Resources Limited
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Kataleen, A.Y.
Less detail

Decision 77-10

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2138
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
770084
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (construct a pipeline from Cochrane to Red Deer)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (construct a pipeline from Cochrane to Red Deer)
Date
1977
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
770084
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Butane
Ethane
Cochrane area
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Pentanes plus
Propane
Red Deer area
Chemical plant
Environmental impact
NTS 82P
NTS 83A
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Safety
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 77-10 on application No. 770084 to construct an oil line to transport ethane, propane, butane and pentanes plus from a point in the NE quarter of section 16, TP.26, R.4 (W5M) near Cochrane to a point in the NW quarter of section 8, TP.38, R.25 (W4M) near Red Deer as part of the Alberta ethane gathering system to provide a continous supply of ethane to the age plant at Joffre.
Interveners
Alberta Natural Gas Company Ltd.
Beddoes, J.L.
Less detail

Decision 79-13

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2083
Applicant
Gulf Canada Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
770551
780221
780222
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Limited and Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1979 (permits to construct three pipelines - Malmo, Bashaw and Nevis areas)
Date
1979
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Limited and Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1979 (permits to construct three pipelines - Malmo, Bashaw and Nevis areas)
Date
1979
Applicant
Gulf Canada Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
770551
780221
780222
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Bashaw field
Gas pipeline
Malmo field
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Automatic control
Environmental impact
ID-79-02
Gas conservation
NTS 83A
Petroleum conservation
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Remote control
Safety
Notes
Decision 79-13 on application No. 770551 to construct a pipeline to transport sour gas from the Malmo-Bashaw area to an existing gas plant (from LSD 5-14-44-22 W4M to LSD 9-33-38-22 W4M) and on application No. 780222 for pipeline to transport sour gas from wells to secondary gas line proposed in application 770551 (TP.43, R.22, W4M) and on application 780221 for a pipeline to transport sour crude oil from a point in LSD 10-6-42-22 W4M to a point in LSD 7-10-44-22 W4M (connection Bashaw battery to an existing oil pipeline).
Interveners
Neis, G.W.
Moore, J.H.
Less detail

Decision 80-15

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2024
Applicant
Peace Pipe Line Ltd.
Federated Pipe Lines Ltd.
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
790677
800109
800113
Title
Decision on application by Peace Pipe Line Ltd., Federated Pipe Lines Ltd. and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1980 (permits to construct pipelines - Grande Prairie area)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Peace Pipe Line Ltd., Federated Pipe Lines Ltd. and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1980 (permits to construct pipelines - Grande Prairie area)
Date
1980
Applicant
Peace Pipe Line Ltd.
Federated Pipe Lines Ltd.
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
790677
800109
800113
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Competition
High pressure
Grande Prairie area
Liquefied petroleum gas
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Deliverability
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Pipeline crossing
Pipeline design
Route selection
Safety
Notes
Decision 80-15 on application No. 790677 by Peace Pipe, No. 800109 by Federated Pipelines and No. 800113 by Dome Petroleum all to transport liquids from the deep basin area of NW Alberta (TP.53-82, R.13 (W5M) to R.12 (W6M)); Board hearing 1980-04-28 to 1980-05-02 and from 1980-05-05 through 1980-05-07
Interveners
Alberta Energy Co. Ltd.
The Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Amerada Minerals Corporation
Amoco Canada Petroleum Co. Ltd.
Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
Canadian Superior Oil Ltd.
CanDel Oil Ltd.
Chieftan Development Co. Ltd.
Esso Resources Canada Ltd.
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Husky Oil Ltd.
Koch Pipelines
PanCanadian Petroleum Ltd.
Petro-Canada Explorations Inc.
Sulpetro Ltd.
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Total Petroleum (N.A.) Ltd.
Union Oil Company of Canada Ltd.
North Canadian Forest Industries
Proctor & Gamble Cellulose Ltd.
Bear Lake Farm Rights Group
Drysdale, F.
Patterson, P.
Friedel, L.
Rigler, C.
MacLeod, L.
Schubert, A.
Less detail

Decision 81-07

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2001
Applicant
Algas Engineering Services Limited
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Husky Oil Operations Limited
Application Number
800561
800562
800741
800742
800806
800807
800897
Title
Decision on application by Algas Engineering Services Ltd. and Alberta Energy Company Ltd., 1981 (permits to construct pipelines and related facilities - Lloydminster and Cold Lake, Edmonton and Cold Lake)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Algas Engineering Services Ltd. and Alberta Energy Company Ltd., 1981 (permits to construct pipelines and related facilities - Lloydminster and Cold Lake, Edmonton and Cold Lake)
Date
1981
Applicant
Algas Engineering Services Limited
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Husky Oil Operations Limited
Application Number
800561
800562
800741
800742
800806
800807
800897
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Bitumen
Cold Lake area
Condensate
Edmonton area
Lloydminster area
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Pump station
Cost analysis
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Land reclamation
NTS 73E
NTS 73L
NTS 83H
NTS 83I
Pipeline crossing
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Right of way
Supply (economics)
Notes
Decision on application No. 800561 by Husky for crude oil/bitumen blend pipeline between Cold Lake and Lloydminster refinery and on application No. 800562 by Husky for condensate pipeline from Lloydminster to Cold Lake and on application No. 800741 by AEC to transport condensate from Edmonton to Cold Lake and on application No. 800742 to transport crude bitumen-condensate blend from Cold Lake to Edmonton and on application No. 800807 to construct pumping and measurement facilities at ESSO's Leming plant in LSD 13-5-65-3 W4M and on application No. 800806 by AEC for second pump station in east Edmonton to act as prime mover on condensate pipeline (TP.49-65, R.1-26, W4M); see related decisions 81-19 and 81-29 see also decision D83-14 for decision on an amendment to the route selected
Interveners
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
BP Exploration Canada Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Imperial Oil Limited
Murphy Oil Company Ltd.
Petro-Canada Exploration Inc.
Shell Canada Limited
City of Lloydminister
Edmonton Regional Planning Commission
Community Advisory Comittee of the Cold Lake Region
Lakeland Environmental and Agricultural Protective Society
Cold Lake-Bonnyville Local of the Central Trapper's Association
Mohr, H.J.
Landowners represented by Robertson, Baynton et al.
Schroter Family
Less detail

Decision 81-19

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1747
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
810221
Title
Examiners report on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1981 (sour multiphase flow line Innisfail area)
Date
1981
Title
Examiners report on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1981 (sour multiphase flow line Innisfail area)
Date
1981
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
810221
Hearing Panel
Bellows LA
Berndtsson NG
Remmer WG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gathering line
Innisfail area
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
NTS 83B
Flowline
Multiphase flow
Oil producing
Oil recovery
Sour brine
Sour crude
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E81-19 on application No. 810221 to construct pipeline from well in LSD 11-21-35-1 W5M to existing pipeline located in LSD 5-15-35-1 W5M to transport sour multiphase effluent from the 11-21 well.
Interveners
Noval, G.S.
Less detail

Decision 81-19

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1989
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
800741
800742
800883
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Shell Canada Limited, 1981 (permits to construct pipelines and related facilities Edmonton-Skaro area)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Shell Canada Limited, 1981 (permits to construct pipelines and related facilities Edmonton-Skaro area)
Date
1981
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
800741
800742
800883
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Bitumen
Butane
Condensate
Edmonton area
Liquefied petroleum gas
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Product pipeline
Propane
Environmental impact
NTS 83H
Pipeline construction
Pipeline route
Right of way
Route selection
Transportation corridor
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 81-19 on application No. 800741, 800742 by AEC to construct pipeline to transport crude bitumen condensate blend from Skaro area to refinery area in Edmonton and an adjacent pipeline to transport condensate in reverse direction and on application No. 800883 by Shell to transport & distribute products from planned refinery near Scotford to Edmonton interprovincial pipeline terminal area (TP.52-57, R.19-23, W4M); see related Decisions 81-7 and 81-29
Interveners
First City Developments Ltd.
Marler, M.
Edmonton Regional Planning Commission
Shirvell, C.S.
Simmons, H.
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Less detail

Decision 81-31

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1735
Applicant
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Application Number
810026
Title
Examiners report on application by Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited, 1981 (Dickson reservoir secondary oil pipeline relocation)
Date
1981
Title
Examiners report on application by Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited, 1981 (Dickson reservoir secondary oil pipeline relocation)
Date
1981
Applicant
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Application Number
810026
Hearing Panel
Bellows LA
Homeniuk TF
Allman RJ
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Red Deer River valley
Relocation
Dam
Dickson dam
NTS 83B
Reservoir
Legal References
Pipeline Act S34
Notes
ERCB Examiners report no.E81-31 on application No. 810026 to construct pipeline to replace an existing crude oil and condensate pipeline in the area of the Dickson reservoir (TP.35, R.2, W5M).
Less detail

Decision 82-06

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2072
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Application Number
811007
811008
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd., 1982 (permits to construct oil pipelines - northeast Edmonton area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd., 1982 (permits to construct oil pipelines - northeast Edmonton area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Application Number
811007
811008
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Bitumen
Condensate
Edmonton area
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Land value
Pipeline crossing
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Route selection
Transmission corridor
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 82-6 on application No. 811007 and 811008 for pipelines extending from east Edmonton refinery to Aikenside area to transport crude bitumen blend to the refinery and bitumen blend diluent (condensate) northward (TP.53-54, R22-23, W4M); see related Decisions 81-7 and 81-19
Interveners
CN Rail
Genstar Gypsum Limited
Jackson, D.F.
Jackson, H.C.
Kurysh, T.
Northwestern Utilities Limited
NOVA, An Alberta Corporation
Shell Canada Limited
Turbo Resources Limited
Prinz von Thurn und Taxis, J.
Van Hecke, C.
Van Hecke. A.
Komant, A.
Alaskan Holdings Limited
Less detail

Decision 82-09

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2069
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Pembina Pipe Line Limited
Application Number
810514
810999
Title
Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd. and Pembina Pipe Line Ltd., 1982 (permits to construct pipelines - west Pembina area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd. and Pembina Pipe Line Ltd., 1982 (permits to construct pipelines - west Pembina area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Pembina Pipe Line Limited
Application Number
810514
810999
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Morin EJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Condensate
Liquefied petroleum gas
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Westpem field
Enhanced recovery scheme
LPG injection
NTS 83B
NTS 83G
Petroleum conservation
Pipeline design
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 82-9 on application No. 810514 by Amoco to construct pipeline to transport ethane, propane, butanes, pentanes and pentanes plus from proposed gas plant in LSD 15-10-47-14 W5M and LSD 9-34-47-13 W5M to an existing pipeline in LSD 4-31-48-12 W5M and on application No. 810999 by Pembina to construct pipeline from an existing Chevron gas plant in LSD 11-22-49-12 W5M and a proposed HBOG plant in section 10-47-14 W5M to the existing Pembina system to transport segregated condensate (TP.43-50, R.5-15, W5M).
Interveners
Petro-Canada Exploration Inc.
Less detail

Decision 83-14

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2276
Applicant
Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
Application Number
830250
830251
Title
Decision on application by Husky Oil Operations Ltd., 1983 (to reroute a section of approved condensate and bitumen blend pipelines between Lloydminister and Cold Lake)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Husky Oil Operations Ltd., 1983 (to reroute a section of approved condensate and bitumen blend pipelines between Lloydminister and Cold Lake)
Date
1983
Applicant
Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
Application Number
830250
830251
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Bitumen
Cold Lake area
Condensate
Lloydminster area
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Agricultural land
Environmental impact
Land reclamation
NTS 73E
NTS 73L
Pipeline route
Route selection
Soil conservation
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision D83-14 on application No. 830250 and No. 830251 to amend permits 19114 and 19115 to alter A portion of the route for combination condensate 7 bitumen blend pipelines between Cold Lake and Lloydminster (TP.50-59, R.1-5, W4M).
Interveners
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Murphy Oil Company Ltd.
B.P. Exploration Canada Ltd.
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Less detail

Decision 83-16

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2345
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Application Number
830215
830216
830217
830218
830219
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd., 1983 (condensate and bitumen blend pipelines and pumping facilities in Fort Kent area and pumping facilities in Bellis area)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd., 1983 (condensate and bitumen blend pipelines and pumping facilities in Fort Kent area and pumping facilities in Bellis area)
Date
1983
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Application Number
830215
830216
830217
830218
830219
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Bellis area
Bitumen
Condensate
Fort Kent area
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Pump station
Capacity
Energy development
Environmental impact
NTS 73L
NTS 83I
Planning
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision on application Nos. 830215, 830216, 830217, 830218, 830219 to construct condensate and bitumen blend pipelines and pumping facilities in the Bellis area (LSD 8-15-59-16 W4M).
Interveners
Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
Murphy Oil Company Ltd.
B.P. Exploration Canada Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 84-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1170
Applicant
Peace Pipe Line Ltd.
Application Number
830987
Title
Examiners report on application by Peace Pipe Line Ltd., 1984 (hydrocarbon liquid products pipeline Elmworth area)
Date
1984
Title
Examiners report on application by Peace Pipe Line Ltd., 1984 (hydrocarbon liquid products pipeline Elmworth area)
Date
1984
Applicant
Peace Pipe Line Ltd.
Application Number
830987
Hearing Panel
Mink FJ
Dilay JD
Houlihan RN
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Elmworth area
Liquefied petroleum gas
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Product pipeline
Environmental impact
Frozen soil
NTS 83L
NTS 83M
Pipeline construction
Pipeline route
Revision
Route selection
Surface rights
Legal References
Pipeline Act S13
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E84-5 on application 830987 to amend permit 19132 to add 29.95 km of 168.3 MM outside diameter pipeline to transport hydrocarbon liquids including ethane, propane, butane, pentanes plus and crude oil, from the Cdn Hunter Elmworth gas processing plant in LSD 1-8-70-11 W6M to storage facilities at the Wapiti pump station in LSD 1-7-69-8 W6M.
Interveners
Elmworth Surface Rights Group
Less detail

Decision 84-10

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1840
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Application Number
840117
840118
840119
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd., 1984 (pipelines and related facilities Cold Lake-Edmonton area)
Date
1984
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd., 1984 (pipelines and related facilities Cold Lake-Edmonton area)
Date
1984
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Application Number
840117
840118
840119
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Warne GA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Bitumen
Cold Lake area
Edmonton area
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Agricultural land
Environmental impact
NTS 73L
NTS 83H
NTS 83I
Pipeline construction
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Route selection
Legal References
Pipeline Act S8
Notes
Decision D84-10 on application No. 840117, No. 840118 and No. 840119 for permits to construct pipelines and related facilities and for approvals to modify existing pipelines and facilities (TP.53-67, R.3-23, W4M); Board hearing 1984-05-15/16
Interveners
Dome Petroleum Limited
Esso Resources Canada Limited
Genstar Corporation
Genstar Gypsum Limited
Industrial Realty Services
Shirvell, C.S.
Simmons, H.
Less detail

Decision 84-22

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1701
Applicant
Federated Pipe Lines Ltd.
Peace Pipe Line Ltd.
Application Number
830394
840496
Title
Decision on application by Federated Pipe Lines Ltd., 1984 (to amend popeline licences and for permits to construct pipelines to transport high vapour pressure products in the Fort Saskatchewan, Morinvieel, Swan Hills area); Decision on application by Peace Pipe Line Ltd.., 1984 (to amend pipeline licences and for permit to construct pipelines to transport HVP products in the Fort Saskatchewan area)
Date
1984
Title
Decision on application by Federated Pipe Lines Ltd., 1984 (to amend popeline licences and for permits to construct pipelines to transport high vapour pressure products in the Fort Saskatchewan, Morinvieel, Swan Hills area); Decision on application by Peace Pipe Line Ltd.., 1984 (to amend pipeline licences and for permit to construct pipelines to transport HVP products in the Fort Saskatchewan area)
Date
1984
Applicant
Federated Pipe Lines Ltd.
Peace Pipe Line Ltd.
Application Number
830394
840496
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Warne GA
Antonio HA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fort Saskatchewan area
Liquefied petroleum gas
Morinville area
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Swan Hills area
Enhanced recovery scheme
High pressure
NTS 83G
NTS 83H
NTS 83J
Pipeline route
Legal References
Pipeline Act S7
Pipeline Act S13
Pipeline Act S23
Notes
Decision D84-22 on application No. 830394 by Federated and application No. 840496 by Peace Pipe.
Interveners
Chepil, N.
Less detail

Decision 84-25

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1151
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
840662
840663
840664
Title
Examiners report on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1984 (permits to construct pipelines to transport sour and sweet gas, fuel gas, and multiphase fluids in the Garrington-Caroline area)
Date
1984
Title
Examiners report on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1984 (permits to construct pipelines to transport sour and sweet gas, fuel gas, and multiphase fluids in the Garrington-Caroline area)
Date
1984
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
840662
840663
840664
Hearing Panel
Dilay JD
Sharp KG
Houlihan RN
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Caroline area
Crossfield Garrington area
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Gathering line
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Dissolved gas
Environmental impact
Gas conservation
Land reclamation
NTS 83B
Pipeline crossing
Pipeline route
Route selection
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E84-25 on application No. 840662 to transport sweet and sour gas from five wells to north Caroline gas plant and and application No. 840664 to transport sweet fuel gas from battery to well and on application No. 840663 to transport oil and associated sweet gas from ten wells to battery.
Interveners
Bighorn Tribal Administration
Taylor, C.
Less detail

Decision 85-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision844
Applicant
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Application Number
841255
Title
Examiner report on application by Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited, 1985 (permit to construct a pipeline to transport crude oil and condensate in the Ferrier area)
Date
1985
Title
Examiner report on application by Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited, 1985 (permit to construct a pipeline to transport crude oil and condensate in the Ferrier area)
Date
1985
Applicant
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Application Number
841255
Hearing Panel
Homeniuk TF
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Ferrier field
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Gathering line
Land value
NTS 83B
Pipeline route
Right of way
Notes
Examiners report E85-3 on application No. 841255 to construct 3.2 km of 88.9 MM. outside diameter pipeline to transport crude oil and condensate from an existing battery at LSD 10-36-38-8 W5M to Rangeland pipeline south Ferrier gathering line.
Interveners
Dome Petroleum Limited
Sorensen, W.T.
Sorensen, F.M.
Dubak, F.
Less detail

50 records – page 1 of 3.