18 records – page 1 of 1.

Decision 63-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2468
Applicant
Cities Service Athabasca Inc.
Imperial Oil Limited
Richfield Oil Corporation
Royalite Oil Company Limited
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
957
219 (Hearing)
1116
220 (Hearing)
Title
Decision on application by cities service Athabasca Inc., and Shell Canada Limited, 1963 (to recover oil from the tar sands)
Date
1963
Title
Decision on application by cities service Athabasca Inc., and Shell Canada Limited, 1963 (to recover oil from the tar sands)
Date
1963
Applicant
Cities Service Athabasca Inc.
Imperial Oil Limited
Richfield Oil Corporation
Royalite Oil Company Limited
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
957
219 (Hearing)
1116
220 (Hearing)
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Manyluk AF
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Athabasca oil sands
Mildred Lake project
Oil sands project
Alberta
Crude oil demand
Economic forecasting
In situ
NTS 74D
NTS 74E
Oil mining
Oil sands oil recovery
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 6A
Notes
ERCB Report 63-8 on application no. 957 (Hearing 219) by Cities Service et al to produce 100,000 barrels per day of synthetic crude oil from Crown Lease No. 17 at Mildred Lake, commencing in 1969 and using a mining and hot water process and on application no. 1116 (Hearing 220) by Shell to product 130,000 barrels of raw crude oil per day from Crown leases No. 26, 42, 45 & 53 in the Namur Lake area of the Athabasca Oil Sands commencing in 1969 and using an in situ thermal recovery process; Board Hearing on Cities Service in Calgary on 1963-01-15/16; Board Hearing on Shell in Calgary on 1963-02-12/13/14; These two applications represent the 2nd and 3rd applications respectively for commercial oil sands schemes.
Less detail

Decision 74-H

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2456
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Shell Explorer Limited
Application Number
7184
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Limited and Shell Explorer Limited, 1974 (under part 8 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act)
Date
1974
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Limited and Shell Explorer Limited, 1974 (under part 8 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act)
Date
1974
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Shell Explorer Limited
Application Number
7184
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Craig DR
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil mining
Alsands project
Fort Mackay area
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 8
Notes
ERCB report 74-H on application No. 7184 for approval of a scheme to construct and operate an oil sands processing plant in the Fort McKay area for the recovery of oil sands, crude bitumen and products; Board hearing 1973-10-09/10, 1973-11-01 see also ERCB report 74-HA for amendment to Decision.
Less detail

Decision 74-HA

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2455
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Shell Explorer Limited
Application Number
7184
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Limited and Shell Explorer Limited, 1974 (under part 8 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act) amendment
Date
1974
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Limited and Shell Explorer Limited, 1974 (under part 8 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act) amendment
Date
1974
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Shell Explorer Limited
Application Number
7184
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil mining
Alsands project
Fort Mackay area
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 8
Notes
ERCB report 74-HA on application No. 7184 for approval of a scheme to construct and operate an oil sands processing plant in the Fort McKay area for the recovery of oil sands, crude bitumen and products; Board hearing 1973-10-09/10, 1973-11-01 see also ERCB report 74-H
Less detail

Decision 74-X

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2441
Applicant
Petrofina Canada Ltd.
Pacific Petroleums Ltd.
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Murphy Oil Company Limited.
Candel Oil Ltd.
Application Number
7554
Title
Decision on application by Petrofina Canada Ltd., Pacific Petroleums Ltd., Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Murphy Oil Company ltd., and Candel Oil Ltd., 1974 (under part 8 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act for a tar sand project)
Date
1974
Title
Decision on application by Petrofina Canada Ltd., Pacific Petroleums Ltd., Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Murphy Oil Company ltd., and Candel Oil Ltd., 1974 (under part 8 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act for a tar sand project)
Date
1974
Applicant
Petrofina Canada Ltd.
Pacific Petroleums Ltd.
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Murphy Oil Company Limited.
Candel Oil Ltd.
Application Number
7554
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Craig DR
Strong JI
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil mining
Athabasca oil sands
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 8
Notes
ERCB report 74-X on application No. 7554 for scheme for recovery of oil sands, crude bitumen and products in Daphne-Calmet area of Athabasca oil sands; Board hearing 1974-05-22/23/24; deregistered in 1979; see also ERCB report 74-XA/74-YA for amendment and ERCB report 74-Y for Decision on power plant for the project.
Less detail

Decision 74-XA|74-YA

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2439
Applicant
Petrofina Canada Ltd.
Pacific Petroleums Ltd.
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Murphy Oil Company Limited.
Application Number
8565
Title
Decision on application by Petrofina Canada Ltd., Pacific Petroleums Ltd., Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Murphy Oil Company ltd., 1974 (under part 8 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act and part 2 of the Hydro and Electric Energy Act)
Date
1974
Title
Decision on application by Petrofina Canada Ltd., Pacific Petroleums Ltd., Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Murphy Oil Company ltd., 1974 (under part 8 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act and part 2 of the Hydro and Electric Energy Act)
Date
1974
Applicant
Petrofina Canada Ltd.
Pacific Petroleums Ltd.
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Murphy Oil Company Limited.
Application Number
8565
Hearing Panel
N/A
Hearing Type
N/A
Utilities
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil mining
Athabasca oil sands
Thermal power plant
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 8
Hydro and Electric Energy Act Part 2
Notes
ERCB report 74-XA & 74-YA on application No. 8565 for certain changes to the form of approval in report 74-X on application No. 7554 and report 74-Y on application No. 7555; see also ERCB reports 74-X and 74-Y
Less detail

Decision 75-H

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2359
Applicant
Home Oil Company Limited
Alminex Limited
Application Number
7688
Title
Decision on application by Home Oil Company Limited and Alminex Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Part 8)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Home Oil Company Limited and Alminex Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Part 8)
Date
1975
Applicant
Home Oil Company Limited
Alminex Limited
Application Number
7688
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Craig DR
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Athabasca oil sands
Oil mining
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Alberta
Economic analysis
Manufactured crude oil
NTS 74E
Pollution control
Sulphur recovery
Surface mining
Tailings
Oil sands reserve
Waste disposal
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 8
Notes
ERCB report 75-H on application No. 7688 for approval of an oil sands processing plant on lease 30 in TP.94, R.8-11, W4; Board hearing 1974-06-26/27/28
Less detail

Decision 79-A

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2344
Applicant
Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
Application Number
780318
Title
Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, part 8)
Date
1979
Title
Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, part 8)
Date
1979
Applicant
Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
Application Number
780318
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Evans RG
Kupchanko EE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Great Canadian Oil Sands
Oil mining
Suncor plant
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Air quality
Athabasca River
Benefit cost analysis
Delayed coking
Effluent
Emission
Environmental impact
Expansion
Material balance
Mine design
NTS 74E
Open pit mining
Overburden ratio
Plant design
Pollution control
Recovery factor
Socio-economic effect
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Surface mining
Upgrading
Waste disposal
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S43
Notes
ERCB report 79-A on application No. 780318 to amend approval No. 1944 to modify and expand existing facilities located in TP.92-93, R.10, W4M; Board hearing 1979-01-30/31
Less detail

Decision 79-F

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2339
Applicant
Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Application Number
790543
Title
Decision on application by Syncrude Canada Ltd., 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, part 8)
Date
1979
Title
Decision on application by Syncrude Canada Ltd., 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, part 8)
Date
1979
Applicant
Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Application Number
790543
Hearing Panel
Strom NA
Mink FJ
Pow JR
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Oil mining
Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Tailings
Oil sands project
Waste disposal
Industrial waste
Locating
NTS 74D
NTS 74E
Overburden
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S43
Notes
ERCB report 79-F on application No. 790543 for approval to construct permanent discard site for overburden in parts of sections 20 & 21, TP.92, R.10, W4M.
Less detail

Decision 79-H

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2337
Applicant
Alsands Project Group
Application Number
780724
790191
Title
Decision on application by Alsands project group, 1979 (oil sands surface mining and upgrading scheme) Alsands Fort Mcmurray project
Date
1979
Title
Decision on application by Alsands project group, 1979 (oil sands surface mining and upgrading scheme) Alsands Fort Mcmurray project
Date
1979
Applicant
Alsands Project Group
Application Number
780724
790191
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Strom NA
Kupchanko EE
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Alsands project
Electric power project
Oil mining
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Benefit cost analysis
Dragline
Drainage
Electric power plant
Environmental impact
Fluid coking
Gasification
Hot water process
Industrial waste
Land reclamation
McMurray Fm
Mine design
Municipality
NTS 74E
Reclamation
Regional planning
Socio-economic effect
Surface mining
Tailings
Oil sands reserve
Upgrading
Waste disposal
Waste water
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S7
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S43
Notes
ERCB report 79-H on application No. 780724 for oil sands surface mining and upgrading scheme (TP.95-96, R.9-11, W4M) and on application No. 790191 for associated power plan; Board hearing 1979-06-19 thru 1979-07-05; addenda - Jan. 7, 1980 attached; see earlier related Decision ERCB report 74-H
Less detail

Decision 83-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2393
Applicant
Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Application Number
821217
Title
Decision on application by Syncrude Canada Ltd., 1983 (overburden discard site)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Syncrude Canada Ltd., 1983 (overburden discard site)
Date
1983
Applicant
Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Application Number
821217
Hearing Panel
Strom NA
Bohme VE
Paterson RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Mildred Lake project
Oil mining
Overburden
Tailings
Oil sands project
Waste disposal
Capacity
Engineering geology
Environment protection
Environmental impact
Land reclamation
Locating
NTS 74E
NTS 74D
Overburden ratio
Planning
Site survey
Slope stability
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S31
Notes
Decision No. D83-5 on application No. 821217 to construct a permanent mine overburden discard site in parts of sections 12, 13 & 14-92-11 W4M; Board hearing 1983-01-21 and 1983-02-08/09
Interveners
Fort McKay Indian Band
Less detail

Decision 88-10

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision170
Applicant
C-H Synfuels Ltd.
Application Number
870612
Title
Decision on application by C-H Synfuels Ltd., 1988 (application to construct an oil sands dredging project)
Date
1988
Title
Decision on application by C-H Synfuels Ltd., 1988 (application to construct an oil sands dredging project)
Date
1988
Applicant
C-H Synfuels Ltd.
Application Number
870612
Hearing Panel
Strom NA
Prince JP
Homeniuk TF
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Dredging
Fort McMurray area
Oil mining
Oil sands project
Environmental impact
Horse River area
Hot water process
Land reclamation
Noise (sound)
NTS 74D
Pilot scale
Pollution
Research and development
Tailings
Waste disposal
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Oil Sands Conservation Act S11
Notes
Decision D88-10 on application No. 870612 for approval to construct an oil sands dredging project in LSD 8-89-9 W4M to dredge a cutoff meander in the Horse River; extraction of the dredged bitumen would take place on a floating modular process barge employing a modified version of the Clark hot water process; bitumen would be stored in tanks, allowed to cool and solidify, the be transported; tailings treatment would employ a method combining the sand and sludge, eliminating the need are a large conventional tailings pond; approval 5704; Board hearing 1988-05-09/10
Interveners
City of Fort McMurray
Sliziak, D.
Priebe, W.
Bussey, V.
Pilger, G.
Desormeaux, L.
Gauthier, D.
Skulsky, G.
Cooper, R.
Rogers, J.
Foy, K.
Foy, R.
Location
##-08-089-09W4
Less detail

Decision 91-AA

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision40
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Title
OSLO project : A commercial oil sands project
Date
1991
Title
OSLO project : A commercial oil sands project
Date
1991
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Land reclamation
Mining geology
Oil mining
OSLO project
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Upgrading
Fort McMurray area
Economic analysis
Socio-economic impact assessment
Notes
interim report of the OSLO application review team
Less detail

Decision 97-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2606
Applicant
Suncor Inc. Oil Sands Group
Application Number
960439
Title
Decision 97-01: Suncor Inc. Oil Sands Group, 1996 application for amendment of Approval No. 7632 for proposed Steepbank Mine development
Date
1997
Title
Decision 97-01: Suncor Inc. Oil Sands Group, 1996 application for amendment of Approval No. 7632 for proposed Steepbank Mine development
Date
1997
Applicant
Suncor Inc. Oil Sands Group
Application Number
960439
Hearing Type
Board
No Hearing
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Environmental impact
Land reclamation
NTS 74D
NTS 74E
Oil mining
Open pit mining
Reclamation
Socio-economic effect
Steepbank mine
Tailings
Tailings - storage
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Waste disposal
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S31
EUB Rules of Practice S17
Oil Sands Conservation Act S14
Notes
EUB Decision D97-01 on application by Suncor to amend its existing approval no. 7632 to construct and operate the proposed Steepbank Mine and for related modifications to the existing approved scheme in access, ore transport, extraction, and tailings handling and to operate the proposed Steepbank mine on a 20-year mine plan, and for approval of the integrated conceptual reclamation plan for Lease 86.17 within the area of the existing approved scheme, and the proposed Steepbank mine. No hearing.
Approval
Approved
Approved with conditions
Conditions
Lieutenant Governor in Council
Less detail

Decision 97-13

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2879
Applicant
Syncrude Canada Limited
Application Number
960552
Title
Decision 97-13: Syncrude Canada Limited : Application by Syncrude for the Aurora Mine
Date
1997
Title
Decision 97-13: Syncrude Canada Limited : Application by Syncrude for the Aurora Mine
Date
1997
Applicant
Syncrude Canada Limited
Application Number
960552
Hearing Type
Board
No Hearing
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Aurora Mine
Communication
Community relations
Environmental impact
Fort McMurray area
Land reclamation
NTS 74E
Oil mining
Reclamation
Regional planning
Socio-economic effect
Tailings
Tailings - storage
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
EUB Decision 97-13 on application no. 960552 by Syncrude for approval to construct, operate and reclaim an oil sands mine and associated bitumen extraction facilities in the Fort McMurray area, the Aurora Mine. The Aurora Mine would include two mining areas: the first located within Twp 96, Ranges 9 to 11, W4M (Aurora North Mine), and the second located within Twp 94 & 95, Ranges 8 and 9, W4M (Aurora South Mine). The application covers: two separate truck and shovel oil sands mines, two mining-extraction production systems at each mine; related infrastructure associated with the operation of each mine; water management plants for the proposed development area, and; an integrated reclamation plan for the proposed Aurora Mine;
No hearing
Interveners
Anez VM
Birch Mountain Resources Ltd.
Confederation of Regions Political Party
Mobil Oil Canada Properties
Northland Forest Products Ltd.
Shell Canada Limited
Solv-Ex Corporation
Pembina Institute for Appropriate Development
Toxics Watch Society
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision 99-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2989
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
970588
Title
Decision 99-02: Shell Canada Limited application to construct and operate an oil sands mine in the Fort McMurray area (Shell Canada Limited Muskeg River Mine Project)
Date
1999
Title
Decision 99-02: Shell Canada Limited application to construct and operate an oil sands mine in the Fort McMurray area (Shell Canada Limited Muskeg River Mine Project)
Date
1999
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
970588
Hearing Panel
Bietz BF
Berg AJ
Lillo HO
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Bitumen
Environmental impact
Fort McMurray area
Land reclamation
Muskeg River Mine Project
Native land claims
NTS 74E
Oil mining
Regional planning
Socio-economic effect
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
EUB Decision 99-02 on application no. 970588 by Shell for approval to construct, operate, and reclaim oil sands mine and associated bitumen extraction facilities (Muskeg River Mine) in the Fort McMurray area. The mine would be located east of the Athabasca River, in Twp 98, Ranges 9/10, W4M. The project includes the mining and processing of oil sands from the western portion of Lease 13. The application consists of approval for a truck and shovel operation, a bitumen extraction plant, a bitumen froth treatment plant and supporting infrastructure. The project consists of three components, the mine and extraction plant on Lease 13, the proposed Scotford Upgrader, and a pipeline connecting the two. D99-02 relates only to the Lease 13 application.
Board hearing (Fort McMurray) held 1998-11-16/17/18/19.
Interveners
Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation
Oil Sands Environmental Coalition
Anzac Metis Local 334
Corridor Pipeline
Syncrude Canada Limited
Less detail

Decision 2004-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3790
Applicant
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
Application Number
1273113
Title
Decision 2004-5: Canadian Natural Resources Limited, application for an oil sands mine, bitumen extraction plant, and bitumen upgrading plant in the Fort McMurray area (Horizon Oilsands project Joint panel report of Alberta Energy and Utilities Board and Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency)
Date
2004
Title
Decision 2004-5: Canadian Natural Resources Limited, application for an oil sands mine, bitumen extraction plant, and bitumen upgrading plant in the Fort McMurray area (Horizon Oilsands project Joint panel report of Alberta Energy and Utilities Board and Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency)
Date
2004
Applicant
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
Application Number
1273113
Hearing Panel
Dilay JD
Houlihan RN
Kupfer G
Hearing Type
Board
Joint
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Bitumen
Environmental impact assessment
Fort McMurray area
NTS 83H
Oil mining
Upgrading
Legal References
Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act 1992
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Oil Sands Conservation Act S11
Notes
Also available in French
Interveners
Deer Creek Energy Limited
Theriault D
Montemurro M
Hackbarth D
Mikisew Cree First Nations
Schindler D
Byrne J
Brownlee J
Kienzle S
Komers P
Waquan A (Chief)
Courtorielle W
Courtorielle S
McKay R
Waquan MR
Marten T
Oil Sands Environmental Coalition
Kitagawa M
Woynillowicz D
Dort-McLean A
Fort McKay First Nation
Metis Local 122 (Fort McKay)
Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation
Fort McMurray Medical Staff Association
Marlboro Environmental Committee
Brandenburg
Sierra Club of Canada
Dastous C
Dastous M
Shell Canada Limited
Suncor Energ Inc.
Imperial Oil Resources
ExxonMobil Canada
Syncrude Canada
UTS Energy Corp.
Birch Mountain Resources Ltd.
Government of Canada
Environment Canada
Fairbairn M
Bates-Frymel L
Norton MR
Brownlee B
Lindeman D
Department of Fisheries and Oceans
Majewski D
Thomson A
Courtney R
Makowecki B
Shamess J
Walker D
Huber W
Natural Resources Canada
Browning GR
Cliffe MK
Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Alberta
Yoshisaka D
de la Chevrotiere C
Marriott P
Boyd M
Barrett R
Bodo K
Chabaylo R
Rhude L
McEachern P
Singh K
Hale C
Wood Buffalo First Nation
Campbell RSJ
Castor W
Cree E
Woodward R
McDonald D
Chipewyan Prairie First Nation Industrial Relations Corporation
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
CNRL must do the following as conditions of approval: On or before December 31, 2007, submit to the EUB for its review and approval a report on the southwest area lease boundary containing a comprehensive evaluation of the lease boundary geology and reserves, geotechnical conditions, alternative mining scenarios and impacts, and associated costs, in accordance with Section 3.1 of EUB ID 2001-7 (Section 7.1.3). At least five years prior to mining at the southeast lease boundary but no later than December 31, 2010, submit to the EUB for its review and approval a report on the southeast area lease boundary containing a comprehensive evaluation of the lease boundary geology and reserves, geotechnical conditions, alternative mining scenarios and impacts, and associated costs, in accordance with Section 3.1 of ID 2001-7 (Section 7.1.3). At least six months prior to the construction of the plant site, submit to the EUB for its review and approval a report documenting efforts that have been taken to optimize the plant site area with respect to the minimization of resource sterilization (Section 7.2.2). At least six months prior to field preparation, submit to the EUB for its review and approval detailed geotechnical designs for all external overburden disposal areas (Section 7.3.2). At least five years prior to mining at the final pit wall but no later than December 31, 2016, submit to the EUB for its review and approval a report evaluating the mineable oil sands ore quality and nonrecoverable quantity in the east final pit wall area adjacent to the Athabasca River, and a detailed geotechnical stability evaluation of the final east pit wall location (Section 7.5.2). Beginning with the September 2004 annual mine plan, submit to the EUB the details of the MOPP testing (Section 7.6.2). At least six months prior to beginning mine depressurization activities, submit to the EUB for its review and approval a monitoring plan to detect basal aquifer pressure changes at the lease boundary with DCEL (Section 7.7.3). On or before February 28 of each year following start-up of mine depressurization activities, or such other date as the EUB may stipulate, submit to the EUB a report on the results of the basal aquifer monitoring program at the lease boundary with DCEL (Section 7.7.3). Within one year of project approval, satisfy the EUB on the need, or otherwise, to monitor the effects of depressurization and injection activities along the northern and western boundary of mining activities (Section 7.7.3). On an annual average basis, limit diluent losses to tailings and the scheme to not more than 4.0 volumes per 1000 volumes of bitumen production, unless it can satisfy the Board that a limit of 4.3 volumes per 1000 volumes of bitumen production is appropriate (Section 8.2.3). Not discharge any untreated froth treatment tailings to the tailings area (Section 8.2.3). Every five years commencing February 28, 2010, or such other date as the EUB may stipulate, submit to the EUB a report on the feasibility of coke use and sales potential (Section 9.13). On or before February 28, 2005, and every year thereafter, or such other date as the EUB may stipulate, submit to the EUB a progress report summarizing
research and development on solid tailings technologies, and
modifications to the existing tailings plan to ensure a trafficable landscape, rapid progressive reclamation and to eliminate the need for long-term storage of fluid tailings (Section 10.1.3). Two years prior to planned start-up, or such other date as the EUB may stipulate, submit to the EUB a report summarizing the engineering design and operating plans for the NST system (Section 10.1.3). On or before February 28 of every year following start-up, or such other date or frequency as the EUB may stipulate, submit to the EUB a report summarizing for the preceding year the performance of the NST system, including reasons for deviations from design (Section 10.1.3). Within one year of project approval, satisfy the EUB on the need, or otherwise, to monitor for potential effects of injection activities on the depressurization needs of other developments in the regional study area (Section 12.7). Include in the project area a minimum setback of 250 m from the edge of the wetted width of the Athabasca River during spring flow, excluding the water intake facility (Section 15.6).
Less detail

Decision 2006-128

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4190
Applicant
Albian Sands Energy Inc.
Application Number
13984411
Title
Decision 2006-128: Albian Sands Energy Inc. application to expand the oil sands mining and processing plant facilities at the Muskeg River Mine, joint panel report EUB and Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
Date
2006
Title
Decision 2006-128: Albian Sands Energy Inc. application to expand the oil sands mining and processing plant facilities at the Muskeg River Mine, joint panel report EUB and Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
Date
2006
Applicant
Albian Sands Energy Inc.
Application Number
13984411
Hearing Panel
Nichol JR
Dilay JD
Cooke L
Hearing Type
Joint
Board
Category
Electric power
Descriptors
Bitumen
Environmental impact assessment
Fort McMurray area
Muskeg River Mine Project
Land reclamation
Oil mining
Oil refinery
Tailings
Oil sands oil recovery
Legal References
Canadian Environmental Assessment Act
Energy Resources Conservation Act
Oil Sands Conservation Act
Notes
Library also has Errata reporting an error appearing in the Decision
Interveners
Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation
Oil Sands Environmental Coalition
Fort McKay First Nation
Fort McKay Industrial Relations Corporation
Birch Mountain Resources Ltd.
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
Clearwater River Paul Cree Band #175 and the Wood Buffalo First Nation Elders Society
Deer Creek Energy
Husky Oil Operations Limited
Syncrude Canada Limited
Imperial Oil resources Ltd.
Mikisew Cree First Nation
Northern Lights Health Region
Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo
Strathcona County Taxpayers Association
Suncor Energy Inc.
Synenxo Energy Inc.
Seeley R
Smith J
Vanderputten A
Martindale D
Nehring L
Goddard G
Meyer M
Collard T
Jalkotzy M
Baker M
Takyi A
Ingen-Housze M
Speller W
Froese K
McKenzie S
Shaw G
Doyle C
Trudell M
Brown D
Biftu G
Fawaz R
Galloway B
Ade F
Barrett R
Dyer R
Singh K
Marriot P
McEachern P
Ives J
Pate C
Hopkins D
Mackenzie A
Jackson W
Martin J
Anderson R
Weclaw P
White B
Ross B
Courtney R
Janowicz M
Mackowecki B
Baraniecki C
Kellerhals M
Lindeman D
Mintz R
Norton M
Sydor M
Tushingham
Wayland M
Watt C
Boulton G
Charron R
Lettner C
Muddle D
Nakamura T
Yacoub W
Mikula R
Soloway D
Lepine M
Marcel R
Shih S
Vander Meulen M
Boag T
Whidden T
Fitzner J
Blais B
Metz L
Corbett S
Carlyle R
Walker H
Blake M
Newell B
Sanders B
Hutton E
Van Waas H
Uliac M
Clarke S
Carlisle J
Howery D
Schneider D
Preiksaitis A
MacDougall T
Kuehne H
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
APPENDIX 1 SUMMARY OF EUB APPROVAL CONDITIONS AND COMMITMENTS COMMITMENTS
Less detail

Decision 2007-13|2007-13 Errata

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4201
Applicant
Imperial Oil Resources Ventures Limited
Application Number
1408771
1414891
Title
Decision 2007-013 : Imperial Oil Resources Ventures Limited application for an oil sands mine and bitumen processing facility (Kearl Oil Sands Project) in the Fort McMurray area : joint panel report (and Errata)
Date
2007
Title
Decision 2007-013 : Imperial Oil Resources Ventures Limited application for an oil sands mine and bitumen processing facility (Kearl Oil Sands Project) in the Fort McMurray area : joint panel report (and Errata)
Date
2007
Applicant
Imperial Oil Resources Ventures Limited
Application Number
1408771
1414891
Hearing Panel
Nichol JR
McGee TM
Cooke L
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Bitumen
Fort McMurray area
Kearl Oil Sands Mine
Oil mining
Oil sands project
Legal References
Canadian Environmental Assessment Act
Energy Resources Conservation Act
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Oil Sands Conservation Act S3
Oil Sands Conservation Act S24
Oil Sands Conservation Act S26
Oil Sands Conservation Act S48
Oil Sands Conservation Regulation
Notes
Errata released May 23, 2007
Interveners
Athabascan Chipewyan First Nation
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
Clearwater River Paul Cree Band No.175
Deer Creek Energy
Deninu Kue First Nation
Fort McKay First Nation Industrial Relations Corporation
Her Majesty the Queen in the Right of Alberta (Alberta)
Alberta Environment Joint Panel
Government of Canada
Misikew Cree First Nation
Northern Lights Health Region
Oil Sands Environmental Coalition
Petro-Canada Oil Sands
Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo
Shell Canada Limited
Suncor Energy Limited
Syncrude Canada Limited
Synenco Energy Inc.
Wood Buffalo First Nation and Wood Buffalo Elder Society
Wood Buffalo Metis Association
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
Under its authority as the EUB, the Joint Panel is prepared to approve Application No.1408771, subject to the approval of the Lieutenant Governor in Council.
Less detail

18 records – page 1 of 1.