Narrow Results By
Applicant
- Albian Sands Energy Inc. 1
- Alminex Limited 1
- Alsands Project Group 1
- C-H Synfuels Ltd. 1
- Canadian Natural Resources Limited 1
- Candel Oil Ltd. 1
- Cities Service Athabasca Inc. 1
- Energy Resources Conservation Board 1
- Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited 1
- Home Oil Company Limited 1
- Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited 2
- Imperial Oil Limited 1
Decision 63-08
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2468
- Applicant
- Cities Service Athabasca Inc.
- Imperial Oil Limited
- Richfield Oil Corporation
- Royalite Oil Company Limited
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 957
- 219 (Hearing)
- 1116
- 220 (Hearing)
- Title
- Decision on application by cities service Athabasca Inc., and Shell Canada Limited, 1963 (to recover oil from the tar sands)
- Date
- 1963
- Title
- Decision on application by cities service Athabasca Inc., and Shell Canada Limited, 1963 (to recover oil from the tar sands)
- Date
- 1963
- Applicant
- Cities Service Athabasca Inc.
- Imperial Oil Limited
- Richfield Oil Corporation
- Royalite Oil Company Limited
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 957
- 219 (Hearing)
- 1116
- 220 (Hearing)
- Hearing Panel
- Govier GW
- Manyluk AF
- Millard V
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Athabasca oil sands
- Mildred Lake project
- Oil sands project
- Alberta
- Crude oil demand
- Economic forecasting
- In situ
- NTS 74D
- NTS 74E
- Oil mining
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 6A
- Notes
- ERCB Report 63-8 on application no. 957 (Hearing 219) by Cities Service et al to produce 100,000 barrels per day of synthetic crude oil from Crown Lease No. 17 at Mildred Lake, commencing in 1969 and using a mining and hot water process and on application no. 1116 (Hearing 220) by Shell to product 130,000 barrels of raw crude oil per day from Crown leases No. 26, 42, 45 & 53 in the Namur Lake area of the Athabasca Oil Sands commencing in 1969 and using an in situ thermal recovery process; Board Hearing on Cities Service in Calgary on 1963-01-15/16; Board Hearing on Shell in Calgary on 1963-02-12/13/14; These two applications represent the 2nd and 3rd applications respectively for commercial oil sands schemes.
Decision 74-H
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2456
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Shell Explorer Limited
- Application Number
- 7184
- Title
- Decision on application by Shell Canada Limited and Shell Explorer Limited, 1974 (under part 8 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act)
- Date
- 1974
- Title
- Decision on application by Shell Canada Limited and Shell Explorer Limited, 1974 (under part 8 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act)
- Date
- 1974
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Shell Explorer Limited
- Application Number
- 7184
- Hearing Panel
- Govier GW
- Craig DR
- Millard V
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 8
- Notes
- ERCB report 74-H on application No. 7184 for approval of a scheme to construct and operate an oil sands processing plant in the Fort McKay area for the recovery of oil sands, crude bitumen and products; Board hearing 1973-10-09/10, 1973-11-01 see also ERCB report 74-HA for amendment to Decision.
Decision 74-HA
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2455
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Shell Explorer Limited
- Application Number
- 7184
- Title
- Decision on application by Shell Canada Limited and Shell Explorer Limited, 1974 (under part 8 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act) amendment
- Date
- 1974
- Title
- Decision on application by Shell Canada Limited and Shell Explorer Limited, 1974 (under part 8 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act) amendment
- Date
- 1974
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Shell Explorer Limited
- Application Number
- 7184
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 8
- Notes
- ERCB report 74-HA on application No. 7184 for approval of a scheme to construct and operate an oil sands processing plant in the Fort McKay area for the recovery of oil sands, crude bitumen and products; Board hearing 1973-10-09/10, 1973-11-01 see also ERCB report 74-H
Decision 74-X
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2441
- Applicant
- Petrofina Canada Ltd.
- Pacific Petroleums Ltd.
- Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
- Murphy Oil Company Limited.
- Candel Oil Ltd.
- Application Number
- 7554
- Title
- Decision on application by Petrofina Canada Ltd., Pacific Petroleums Ltd., Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Murphy Oil Company ltd., and Candel Oil Ltd., 1974 (under part 8 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act for a tar sand project)
- Date
- 1974
- Title
- Decision on application by Petrofina Canada Ltd., Pacific Petroleums Ltd., Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Murphy Oil Company ltd., and Candel Oil Ltd., 1974 (under part 8 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act for a tar sand project)
- Date
- 1974
- Applicant
- Petrofina Canada Ltd.
- Pacific Petroleums Ltd.
- Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
- Murphy Oil Company Limited.
- Candel Oil Ltd.
- Application Number
- 7554
- Hearing Panel
- Govier GW
- Craig DR
- Strong JI
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil mining
- Athabasca oil sands
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 8
- Notes
- ERCB report 74-X on application No. 7554 for scheme for recovery of oil sands, crude bitumen and products in Daphne-Calmet area of Athabasca oil sands; Board hearing 1974-05-22/23/24; deregistered in 1979; see also ERCB report 74-XA/74-YA for amendment and ERCB report 74-Y for Decision on power plant for the project.
Decision 74-XA|74-YA
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2439
- Applicant
- Petrofina Canada Ltd.
- Pacific Petroleums Ltd.
- Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
- Murphy Oil Company Limited.
- Application Number
- 8565
- Title
- Decision on application by Petrofina Canada Ltd., Pacific Petroleums Ltd., Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Murphy Oil Company ltd., 1974 (under part 8 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act and part 2 of the Hydro and Electric Energy Act)
- Date
- 1974
- Title
- Decision on application by Petrofina Canada Ltd., Pacific Petroleums Ltd., Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Murphy Oil Company ltd., 1974 (under part 8 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act and part 2 of the Hydro and Electric Energy Act)
- Date
- 1974
- Applicant
- Petrofina Canada Ltd.
- Pacific Petroleums Ltd.
- Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
- Murphy Oil Company Limited.
- Application Number
- 8565
- Hearing Panel
- N/A
- Hearing Type
- N/A
- Utilities
- Category
- Oil sands
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 8
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act Part 2
- Notes
- ERCB report 74-XA & 74-YA on application No. 8565 for certain changes to the form of approval in report 74-X on application No. 7554 and report 74-Y on application No. 7555; see also ERCB reports 74-X and 74-Y
Decision 75-H
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2359
- Applicant
- Home Oil Company Limited
- Alminex Limited
- Application Number
- 7688
- Title
- Decision on application by Home Oil Company Limited and Alminex Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Part 8)
- Date
- 1975
- Title
- Decision on application by Home Oil Company Limited and Alminex Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Part 8)
- Date
- 1975
- Applicant
- Home Oil Company Limited
- Alminex Limited
- Application Number
- 7688
- Hearing Panel
- Govier GW
- Craig DR
- Millard V
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Athabasca oil sands
- Oil mining
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Alberta
- Economic analysis
- Manufactured crude oil
- NTS 74E
- Pollution control
- Sulphur recovery
- Surface mining
- Tailings
- Oil sands reserve
- Waste disposal
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 8
- Notes
- ERCB report 75-H on application No. 7688 for approval of an oil sands processing plant on lease 30 in TP.94, R.8-11, W4; Board hearing 1974-06-26/27/28
Decision 79-A
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2344
- Applicant
- Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
- Application Number
- 780318
- Title
- Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, part 8)
- Date
- 1979
- Title
- Decision on application by Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, part 8)
- Date
- 1979
- Applicant
- Great Canadian Oil Sands Limited
- Application Number
- 780318
- Hearing Panel
- Bohme VE
- Evans RG
- Kupchanko EE
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Great Canadian Oil Sands
- Oil mining
- Suncor plant
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Air quality
- Athabasca River
- Benefit cost analysis
- Delayed coking
- Effluent
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Expansion
- Material balance
- Mine design
- NTS 74E
- Open pit mining
- Overburden ratio
- Plant design
- Pollution control
- Recovery factor
- Socio-economic effect
- Sulphur dioxide
- Sulphur recovery
- Surface mining
- Upgrading
- Waste disposal
- Water quality
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S43
- Notes
- ERCB report 79-A on application No. 780318 to amend approval No. 1944 to modify and expand existing facilities located in TP.92-93, R.10, W4M; Board hearing 1979-01-30/31
Decision 79-F
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2339
- Applicant
- Syncrude Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 790543
- Title
- Decision on application by Syncrude Canada Ltd., 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, part 8)
- Date
- 1979
- Title
- Decision on application by Syncrude Canada Ltd., 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, part 8)
- Date
- 1979
- Applicant
- Syncrude Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 790543
- Hearing Panel
- Strom NA
- Mink FJ
- Pow JR
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Oil mining
- Syncrude Canada Ltd.
- Tailings
- Oil sands project
- Waste disposal
- Industrial waste
- Locating
- NTS 74D
- NTS 74E
- Overburden
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S43
- Notes
- ERCB report 79-F on application No. 790543 for approval to construct permanent discard site for overburden in parts of sections 20 & 21, TP.92, R.10, W4M.
Decision 79-H
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2337
- Applicant
- Alsands Project Group
- Application Number
- 780724
- 790191
- Title
- Decision on application by Alsands project group, 1979 (oil sands surface mining and upgrading scheme) Alsands Fort Mcmurray project
- Date
- 1979
- Title
- Decision on application by Alsands project group, 1979 (oil sands surface mining and upgrading scheme) Alsands Fort Mcmurray project
- Date
- 1979
- Applicant
- Alsands Project Group
- Application Number
- 780724
- 790191
- Hearing Panel
- Berkowitz N
- Strom NA
- Kupchanko EE
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Utilities
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Alsands project
- Electric power project
- Oil mining
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Benefit cost analysis
- Dragline
- Drainage
- Electric power plant
- Environmental impact
- Fluid coking
- Gasification
- Hot water process
- Industrial waste
- Land reclamation
- McMurray Fm
- Mine design
- Municipality
- NTS 74E
- Reclamation
- Regional planning
- Socio-economic effect
- Surface mining
- Tailings
- Oil sands reserve
- Upgrading
- Waste disposal
- Waste water
- Legal References
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S7
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S43
- Notes
- ERCB report 79-H on application No. 780724 for oil sands surface mining and upgrading scheme (TP.95-96, R.9-11, W4M) and on application No. 790191 for associated power plan; Board hearing 1979-06-19 thru 1979-07-05; addenda - Jan. 7, 1980 attached; see earlier related Decision ERCB report 74-H
Decision 83-05
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2393
- Applicant
- Syncrude Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 821217
- Title
- Decision on application by Syncrude Canada Ltd., 1983 (overburden discard site)
- Date
- 1983
- Title
- Decision on application by Syncrude Canada Ltd., 1983 (overburden discard site)
- Date
- 1983
- Applicant
- Syncrude Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 821217
- Hearing Panel
- Strom NA
- Bohme VE
- Paterson RG
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Mildred Lake project
- Oil mining
- Overburden
- Tailings
- Oil sands project
- Waste disposal
- Capacity
- Engineering geology
- Environment protection
- Environmental impact
- Land reclamation
- Locating
- NTS 74E
- NTS 74D
- Overburden ratio
- Planning
- Site survey
- Slope stability
- Socio-economic effect
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S31
- Notes
- Decision No. D83-5 on application No. 821217 to construct a permanent mine overburden discard site in parts of sections 12, 13 & 14-92-11 W4M; Board hearing 1983-01-21 and 1983-02-08/09
- Interveners
- Fort McKay Indian Band
Decision 88-10
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision170
- Applicant
- C-H Synfuels Ltd.
- Application Number
- 870612
- Title
- Decision on application by C-H Synfuels Ltd., 1988 (application to construct an oil sands dredging project)
- Date
- 1988
- Title
- Decision on application by C-H Synfuels Ltd., 1988 (application to construct an oil sands dredging project)
- Date
- 1988
- Applicant
- C-H Synfuels Ltd.
- Application Number
- 870612
- Hearing Panel
- Strom NA
- Prince JP
- Homeniuk TF
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Dredging
- Fort McMurray area
- Oil mining
- Oil sands project
- Environmental impact
- Horse River area
- Hot water process
- Land reclamation
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 74D
- Pilot scale
- Pollution
- Research and development
- Tailings
- Waste disposal
- Legal References
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S11
- Notes
- Decision D88-10 on application No. 870612 for approval to construct an oil sands dredging project in LSD 8-89-9 W4M to dredge a cutoff meander in the Horse River; extraction of the dredged bitumen would take place on a floating modular process barge employing a modified version of the Clark hot water process; bitumen would be stored in tanks, allowed to cool and solidify, the be transported; tailings treatment would employ a method combining the sand and sludge, eliminating the need are a large conventional tailings pond; approval 5704; Board hearing 1988-05-09/10
- Interveners
- City of Fort McMurray
- Sliziak, D.
- Priebe, W.
- Bussey, V.
- Pilger, G.
- Desormeaux, L.
- Gauthier, D.
- Skulsky, G.
- Cooper, R.
- Rogers, J.
- Foy, K.
- Foy, R.
- Location
- ##-08-089-09W4
Decision 91-AA
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision40
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Title
- OSLO project : A commercial oil sands project
- Date
- 1991
- Title
- OSLO project : A commercial oil sands project
- Date
- 1991
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Land reclamation
- Mining geology
- Oil mining
- OSLO project
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Upgrading
- Fort McMurray area
- Economic analysis
- Socio-economic impact assessment
- Notes
- interim report of the OSLO application review team
Decision 97-01
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2606
- Applicant
- Suncor Inc. Oil Sands Group
- Application Number
- 960439
- Title
- Decision 97-01: Suncor Inc. Oil Sands Group, 1996 application for amendment of Approval No. 7632 for proposed Steepbank Mine development
- Date
- 1997
- Title
- Decision 97-01: Suncor Inc. Oil Sands Group, 1996 application for amendment of Approval No. 7632 for proposed Steepbank Mine development
- Date
- 1997
- Applicant
- Suncor Inc. Oil Sands Group
- Application Number
- 960439
- Hearing Type
- Board
- No Hearing
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Environmental impact
- Land reclamation
- NTS 74D
- NTS 74E
- Oil mining
- Open pit mining
- Reclamation
- Socio-economic effect
- Steepbank mine
- Tailings
- Tailings - storage
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Waste disposal
- Legal References
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S31
- EUB Rules of Practice S17
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S14
- Notes
- EUB Decision D97-01 on application by Suncor to amend its existing approval no. 7632 to construct and operate the proposed Steepbank Mine and for related modifications to the existing approved scheme in access, ore transport, extraction, and tailings handling and to operate the proposed Steepbank mine on a 20-year mine plan, and for approval of the integrated conceptual reclamation plan for Lease 86.17 within the area of the existing approved scheme, and the proposed Steepbank mine. No hearing.
- Approval
- Approved
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- Lieutenant Governor in Council
Decision 97-13
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2879
- Applicant
- Syncrude Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 960552
- Title
- Decision 97-13: Syncrude Canada Limited : Application by Syncrude for the Aurora Mine
- Date
- 1997
- Title
- Decision 97-13: Syncrude Canada Limited : Application by Syncrude for the Aurora Mine
- Date
- 1997
- Applicant
- Syncrude Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 960552
- Hearing Type
- Board
- No Hearing
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Aurora Mine
- Communication
- Community relations
- Environmental impact
- Fort McMurray area
- Land reclamation
- NTS 74E
- Oil mining
- Reclamation
- Regional planning
- Socio-economic effect
- Tailings
- Tailings - storage
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Legal References
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
- Notes
- EUB Decision 97-13 on application no. 960552 by Syncrude for approval to construct, operate and reclaim an oil sands mine and associated bitumen extraction facilities in the Fort McMurray area, the Aurora Mine. The Aurora Mine would include two mining areas: the first located within Twp 96, Ranges 9 to 11, W4M (Aurora North Mine), and the second located within Twp 94 & 95, Ranges 8 and 9, W4M (Aurora South Mine). The application covers: two separate truck and shovel oil sands mines, two mining-extraction production systems at each mine; related infrastructure associated with the operation of each mine; water management plants for the proposed development area, and; an integrated reclamation plan for the proposed Aurora Mine;
- No hearing
- Interveners
- Anez VM
- Birch Mountain Resources Ltd.
- Confederation of Regions Political Party
- Mobil Oil Canada Properties
- Northland Forest Products Ltd.
- Shell Canada Limited
- Solv-Ex Corporation
- Pembina Institute for Appropriate Development
- Toxics Watch Society
- Approval
- Approved
Decision 99-02
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2989
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 970588
- Title
- Decision 99-02: Shell Canada Limited application to construct and operate an oil sands mine in the Fort McMurray area (Shell Canada Limited Muskeg River Mine Project)
- Date
- 1999
- Title
- Decision 99-02: Shell Canada Limited application to construct and operate an oil sands mine in the Fort McMurray area (Shell Canada Limited Muskeg River Mine Project)
- Date
- 1999
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 970588
- Hearing Panel
- Bietz BF
- Berg AJ
- Lillo HO
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Bitumen
- Environmental impact
- Fort McMurray area
- Land reclamation
- Muskeg River Mine Project
- Native land claims
- NTS 74E
- Oil mining
- Regional planning
- Socio-economic effect
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Legal References
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
- Notes
- EUB Decision 99-02 on application no. 970588 by Shell for approval to construct, operate, and reclaim oil sands mine and associated bitumen extraction facilities (Muskeg River Mine) in the Fort McMurray area. The mine would be located east of the Athabasca River, in Twp 98, Ranges 9/10, W4M. The project includes the mining and processing of oil sands from the western portion of Lease 13. The application consists of approval for a truck and shovel operation, a bitumen extraction plant, a bitumen froth treatment plant and supporting infrastructure. The project consists of three components, the mine and extraction plant on Lease 13, the proposed Scotford Upgrader, and a pipeline connecting the two. D99-02 relates only to the Lease 13 application.
- Board hearing (Fort McMurray) held 1998-11-16/17/18/19.
- Interveners
- Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation
- Oil Sands Environmental Coalition
- Anzac Metis Local 334
- Corridor Pipeline
- Syncrude Canada Limited
Decision 2004-05
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3790
- Applicant
- Canadian Natural Resources Limited
- Application Number
- 1273113
- Title
- Decision 2004-5: Canadian Natural Resources Limited, application for an oil sands mine, bitumen extraction plant, and bitumen upgrading plant in the Fort McMurray area (Horizon Oilsands project Joint panel report of Alberta Energy and Utilities Board and Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency)
- Date
- 2004
- Title
- Decision 2004-5: Canadian Natural Resources Limited, application for an oil sands mine, bitumen extraction plant, and bitumen upgrading plant in the Fort McMurray area (Horizon Oilsands project Joint panel report of Alberta Energy and Utilities Board and Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency)
- Date
- 2004
- Applicant
- Canadian Natural Resources Limited
- Application Number
- 1273113
- Hearing Panel
- Dilay JD
- Houlihan RN
- Kupfer G
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Joint
- Category
- Oil sands
- Legal References
- Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act 1992
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S11
- Notes
- Also available in French
- Interveners
- Deer Creek Energy Limited
- Theriault D
- Montemurro M
- Hackbarth D
- Mikisew Cree First Nations
- Schindler D
- Byrne J
- Brownlee J
- Kienzle S
- Komers P
- Waquan A (Chief)
- Courtorielle W
- Courtorielle S
- McKay R
- Waquan MR
- Marten T
- Oil Sands Environmental Coalition
- Kitagawa M
- Woynillowicz D
- Dort-McLean A
- Fort McKay First Nation
- Metis Local 122 (Fort McKay)
- Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation
- Fort McMurray Medical Staff Association
- Marlboro Environmental Committee
- Brandenburg
- Sierra Club of Canada
- Dastous C
- Dastous M
- Shell Canada Limited
- Suncor Energ Inc.
- Imperial Oil Resources
- ExxonMobil Canada
- Syncrude Canada
- UTS Energy Corp.
- Birch Mountain Resources Ltd.
- Government of Canada
- Environment Canada
- Fairbairn M
- Bates-Frymel L
- Norton MR
- Brownlee B
- Lindeman D
- Department of Fisheries and Oceans
- Majewski D
- Thomson A
- Courtney R
- Makowecki B
- Shamess J
- Walker D
- Huber W
- Natural Resources Canada
- Browning GR
- Cliffe MK
- Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Alberta
- Yoshisaka D
- de la Chevrotiere C
- Marriott P
- Boyd M
- Barrett R
- Bodo K
- Chabaylo R
- Rhude L
- McEachern P
- Singh K
- Hale C
- Wood Buffalo First Nation
- Campbell RSJ
- Castor W
- Cree E
- Woodward R
- McDonald D
- Chipewyan Prairie First Nation Industrial Relations Corporation
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- CNRL must do the following as conditions of approval: On or before December 31, 2007, submit to the EUB for its review and approval a report on the southwest area lease boundary containing a comprehensive evaluation of the lease boundary geology and reserves, geotechnical conditions, alternative mining scenarios and impacts, and associated costs, in accordance with Section 3.1 of EUB ID 2001-7 (Section 7.1.3). At least five years prior to mining at the southeast lease boundary but no later than December 31, 2010, submit to the EUB for its review and approval a report on the southeast area lease boundary containing a comprehensive evaluation of the lease boundary geology and reserves, geotechnical conditions, alternative mining scenarios and impacts, and associated costs, in accordance with Section 3.1 of ID 2001-7 (Section 7.1.3). At least six months prior to the construction of the plant site, submit to the EUB for its review and approval a report documenting efforts that have been taken to optimize the plant site area with respect to the minimization of resource sterilization (Section 7.2.2). At least six months prior to field preparation, submit to the EUB for its review and approval detailed geotechnical designs for all external overburden disposal areas (Section 7.3.2). At least five years prior to mining at the final pit wall but no later than December 31, 2016, submit to the EUB for its review and approval a report evaluating the mineable oil sands ore quality and nonrecoverable quantity in the east final pit wall area adjacent to the Athabasca River, and a detailed geotechnical stability evaluation of the final east pit wall location (Section 7.5.2). Beginning with the September 2004 annual mine plan, submit to the EUB the details of the MOPP testing (Section 7.6.2). At least six months prior to beginning mine depressurization activities, submit to the EUB for its review and approval a monitoring plan to detect basal aquifer pressure changes at the lease boundary with DCEL (Section 7.7.3). On or before February 28 of each year following start-up of mine depressurization activities, or such other date as the EUB may stipulate, submit to the EUB a report on the results of the basal aquifer monitoring program at the lease boundary with DCEL (Section 7.7.3). Within one year of project approval, satisfy the EUB on the need, or otherwise, to monitor the effects of depressurization and injection activities along the northern and western boundary of mining activities (Section 7.7.3). On an annual average basis, limit diluent losses to tailings and the scheme to not more than 4.0 volumes per 1000 volumes of bitumen production, unless it can satisfy the Board that a limit of 4.3 volumes per 1000 volumes of bitumen production is appropriate (Section 8.2.3). Not discharge any untreated froth treatment tailings to the tailings area (Section 8.2.3). Every five years commencing February 28, 2010, or such other date as the EUB may stipulate, submit to the EUB a report on the feasibility of coke use and sales potential (Section 9.13). On or before February 28, 2005, and every year thereafter, or such other date as the EUB may stipulate, submit to the EUB a progress report summarizing
- research and development on solid tailings technologies, and
- modifications to the existing tailings plan to ensure a trafficable landscape, rapid progressive reclamation and to eliminate the need for long-term storage of fluid tailings (Section 10.1.3). Two years prior to planned start-up, or such other date as the EUB may stipulate, submit to the EUB a report summarizing the engineering design and operating plans for the NST system (Section 10.1.3). On or before February 28 of every year following start-up, or such other date or frequency as the EUB may stipulate, submit to the EUB a report summarizing for the preceding year the performance of the NST system, including reasons for deviations from design (Section 10.1.3). Within one year of project approval, satisfy the EUB on the need, or otherwise, to monitor for potential effects of injection activities on the depressurization needs of other developments in the regional study area (Section 12.7). Include in the project area a minimum setback of 250 m from the edge of the wetted width of the Athabasca River during spring flow, excluding the water intake facility (Section 15.6).
Decision 2006-128
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4190
- Applicant
- Albian Sands Energy Inc.
- Application Number
- 13984411
- Title
- Decision 2006-128: Albian Sands Energy Inc. application to expand the oil sands mining and processing plant facilities at the Muskeg River Mine, joint panel report EUB and Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
- Date
- 2006
- Title
- Decision 2006-128: Albian Sands Energy Inc. application to expand the oil sands mining and processing plant facilities at the Muskeg River Mine, joint panel report EUB and Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
- Date
- 2006
- Applicant
- Albian Sands Energy Inc.
- Application Number
- 13984411
- Hearing Panel
- Nichol JR
- Dilay JD
- Cooke L
- Hearing Type
- Joint
- Board
- Category
- Electric power
- Descriptors
- Bitumen
- Environmental impact assessment
- Fort McMurray area
- Muskeg River Mine Project
- Land reclamation
- Oil mining
- Oil refinery
- Tailings
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Legal References
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act
- Energy Resources Conservation Act
- Oil Sands Conservation Act
- Notes
- Library also has Errata reporting an error appearing in the Decision
- Interveners
- Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation
- Oil Sands Environmental Coalition
- Fort McKay First Nation
- Fort McKay Industrial Relations Corporation
- Birch Mountain Resources Ltd.
- Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
- Clearwater River Paul Cree Band #175 and the Wood Buffalo First Nation Elders Society
- Deer Creek Energy
- Husky Oil Operations Limited
- Syncrude Canada Limited
- Imperial Oil resources Ltd.
- Mikisew Cree First Nation
- Northern Lights Health Region
- Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo
- Strathcona County Taxpayers Association
- Suncor Energy Inc.
- Synenxo Energy Inc.
- Seeley R
- Smith J
- Vanderputten A
- Martindale D
- Nehring L
- Goddard G
- Meyer M
- Collard T
- Jalkotzy M
- Baker M
- Takyi A
- Ingen-Housze M
- Speller W
- Froese K
- McKenzie S
- Shaw G
- Doyle C
- Trudell M
- Brown D
- Biftu G
- Fawaz R
- Galloway B
- Ade F
- Barrett R
- Dyer R
- Singh K
- Marriot P
- McEachern P
- Ives J
- Pate C
- Hopkins D
- Mackenzie A
- Jackson W
- Martin J
- Anderson R
- Weclaw P
- White B
- Ross B
- Courtney R
- Janowicz M
- Mackowecki B
- Baraniecki C
- Kellerhals M
- Lindeman D
- Mintz R
- Norton M
- Sydor M
- Tushingham
- Wayland M
- Watt C
- Boulton G
- Charron R
- Lettner C
- Muddle D
- Nakamura T
- Yacoub W
- Mikula R
- Soloway D
- Lepine M
- Marcel R
- Shih S
- Vander Meulen M
- Boag T
- Whidden T
- Fitzner J
- Blais B
- Metz L
- Corbett S
- Carlyle R
- Walker H
- Blake M
- Newell B
- Sanders B
- Hutton E
- Van Waas H
- Uliac M
- Clarke S
- Carlisle J
- Howery D
- Schneider D
- Preiksaitis A
- MacDougall T
- Kuehne H
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- APPENDIX 1 SUMMARY OF EUB APPROVAL CONDITIONS AND COMMITMENTS COMMITMENTS
Decision 2007-13|2007-13 Errata
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4201
- Applicant
- Imperial Oil Resources Ventures Limited
- Application Number
- 1408771
- 1414891
- Title
- Decision 2007-013 : Imperial Oil Resources Ventures Limited application for an oil sands mine and bitumen processing facility (Kearl Oil Sands Project) in the Fort McMurray area : joint panel report (and Errata)
- Date
- 2007
- Title
- Decision 2007-013 : Imperial Oil Resources Ventures Limited application for an oil sands mine and bitumen processing facility (Kearl Oil Sands Project) in the Fort McMurray area : joint panel report (and Errata)
- Date
- 2007
- Applicant
- Imperial Oil Resources Ventures Limited
- Application Number
- 1408771
- 1414891
- Hearing Panel
- Nichol JR
- McGee TM
- Cooke L
- Category
- Well licence
- Legal References
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act
- Energy Resources Conservation Act
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S3
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S24
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S26
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S48
- Oil Sands Conservation Regulation
- Notes
- Errata released May 23, 2007
- Interveners
- Athabascan Chipewyan First Nation
- Canadian Natural Resources Limited
- Clearwater River Paul Cree Band No.175
- Deer Creek Energy
- Deninu Kue First Nation
- Fort McKay First Nation Industrial Relations Corporation
- Her Majesty the Queen in the Right of Alberta (Alberta)
- Alberta Environment Joint Panel
- Government of Canada
- Misikew Cree First Nation
- Northern Lights Health Region
- Oil Sands Environmental Coalition
- Petro-Canada Oil Sands
- Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo
- Shell Canada Limited
- Suncor Energy Limited
- Syncrude Canada Limited
- Synenco Energy Inc.
- Wood Buffalo First Nation and Wood Buffalo Elder Society
- Wood Buffalo Metis Association
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- Under its authority as the EUB, the Joint Panel is prepared to approve Application No.1408771, subject to the approval of the Lieutenant Governor in Council.