Narrow Results By
Decision 96-04
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2576
- Applicant
- PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 960316
- Title
- Decision 96-04 : PanCanadian Petroleum Limited : Application for a well licence Crossfield Field
- Date
- 1996
- Title
- Decision 96-04 : PanCanadian Petroleum Limited : Application for a well licence Crossfield Field
- Date
- 1996
- Applicant
- PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 960316
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Basal Quartz Fm
- Chestermere Lake area
- Crossfield field
- ID-87-02
- Gas producing
- Health
- Land value
- Locating
- NTS 82P
- Odor
- Safety
- Sour gas
- Well licence
- Notes
- EUB Decision D96-4 on application no. 960316 by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited for a licence to drill a directional well from a surface location in Lsd 9 Sec 2 Twp 24 Rge 28 W4M to obtain gas production from the Basal Quartz Fm;
- Board hearing scheduled for 1996-05-22 but subsequently cancelled
- Approval
- Withdrawn
- Location
- 09-02-024-28W4
Decision 97-03
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2856
- Applicant
- CanNat Resources Inc.
- Application Number
- 970189
- Title
- Examiner report on application by CanNat Resources Inc., 1997 (application for two well licences Joarcam Area)
- Date
- 1997
- Title
- Examiner report on application by CanNat Resources Inc., 1997 (application for two well licences Joarcam Area)
- Date
- 1997
- Applicant
- CanNat Resources Inc.
- Application Number
- 970189
- Hearing Panel
- Bruni MJ
- Skappak DL
- Hill CD
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Drainage
- Environmental impact
- Groundwater
- Joarcam field
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 83H
- Odor
- Surface water
- Water disposal
- Water pollution
- Water quality
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S11
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Notes
- EUB Examiners Report E97-03 on application no. 970189 by CanNat Resources for licences to drill two wells from a single surface location at Lsd 2 Sec 26 Twp 50 Rge 22 W4M to obtain production from the Viking Fm.
- Interveners
- Olsen Barry and Carol
- Read DL
- Approval
- Approved
- Location
- 02-26-050-22W4
Decision 97-05
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2754
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 960230
- Title
- Decision 97-05: Shell Canada Limited : Application for increased throughput, sour gas plant, Caroline Field
- Date
- 1997
- Title
- Decision 97-05: Shell Canada Limited : Application for increased throughput, sour gas plant, Caroline Field
- Date
- 1997
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 960230
- Hearing Panel
- Mink FJ
- Miller GJ
- Dilay JD
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Caroline field
- Caroline gas project
- Gas processing plant
- Sour gas
- Sulphur recovery
- Sulphur recovery plant
- Air quality
- Emergency procedure
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Decision D1990-08
- Gas flaring
- Health
- Monitoring
- NTS 82O
- Odor
- Public opinion
- Safety
- Soil pollution
- Storage facility
- Sulphur dioxide
- Notes
- EUB Decision D97-05 on application no. 960230 by Shell Canada to amend the Caroline gas plant Approval No. 6319 to increase the raw gas inlet by approximately 15% and increase the sulphur inlet by 21%;
- Board hearing 1996-10-01/02/03/04
- Interveners
- Johnston W
- Johnston I
- Coalition of Citizens Impacted by the Caroline Shell Gas Plant
- Coderre L
- Dahlman P
- Kelley E
- Kelley G
- Macklin J
- McLeod L
- McMurtry D
- Oliver T
- Paget L
- Paget S
- Watson R
- Resident Members of the Caroline Industry/Resident Noise Committee
- Brown D
- Gabler R
- Clearwater M.D.
- Jones D
- Feddema A
- Hermann J
- Approval
- Approved
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- Shell is to conduct a thorough review of potential increases in fugutive emissions
- Shell is to notify the Board, on a quarterly basis, of all public complaints
- Shell is to review the location of its monitoring trailers with AEP
- Shell is to work with the Pagets regarding trailer location
Decision 98-13
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2948
- Applicant
- Canadian 88 Energy Corp.
- Application Number
- 1007569
- Title
- Decision 98-13 : Canadian 88 Energy Corp.: Application to expand sour gas processing facility, Garrington Field
- Date
- 1998
- Title
- Decision 98-13 : Canadian 88 Energy Corp.: Application to expand sour gas processing facility, Garrington Field
- Date
- 1998
- Applicant
- Canadian 88 Energy Corp.
- Application Number
- 1007569
- Hearing Panel
- Prince JP
- Dunn GC
- Schnitzler WJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Air quality
- Emergency procedure
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Gas processing plant
- Sour gas
- Sulphur recovery
- Sulphur recovery plant
- Gas flaring
- Groundwater
- Health
- Monitoring
- Odor
- Proliferation
- Public opinion
- Safety
- Soil pollution
- Sulphur dioxide
- NTS 72O
- Legal References
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S29
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Notes
- EUB Decision D98-13 on application no. 1007569 by Canadian 88 to increase the raw gas inlet at an existing facility at Lsd 6-18-32-1 W5M to a capacity of 3 400 000 m3/day with and H2S content of 228 mol/kmol and a sulphur recovery efficiency of 98.4%.
- Board hearing 1996-03-03/04
- Interveners
- Olds Area Residents Coalition
- Latimer B
- Latimer L
- Latimer G
- Latimer J
- Alberta Surface Rights Federation
- Approval
- Approved
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- Not less that 98.4 per cent of sulphur is recovered on a quarterly basis
- Not less than 98.7 per cent of the sulphur is recovered on an annual calendar year basis
- Eliminate flaring of sour vapours from produced water
- Modify amine flash gas contractor to reduce the H2S content to less than 100 ppm
- Sound monitoring survey in accordance with ID 94-4 to be submitted to all interested parties
- Cost/benefit assessment of sound reduction at amine cooler to be submitted to all interested parties
- Location
- 06-18-032-01W5
Decision 2011-19
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4457
- Applicant
- Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNRL)
- Application Number
- 1629922
- 1629923
- 1629924
- 1629926
- 1629927
- 1629929
- 1629930
- 1629931
- 1629933
- 1629934
- 1629935
- 1629936
- 1629938
- 1648948
- 1648949
- 1634352
- Title
- Decision 2011-019 : Canadian Natural Resources Limited applications for 15 well and 8 facility licences Sugden Field
- Date
- 2011
- Title
- Decision 2011-019 : Canadian Natural Resources Limited applications for 15 well and 8 facility licences Sugden Field
- Date
- 2011
- Application Number
- 1629922
- 1629923
- 1629924
- 1629926
- 1629927
- 1629929
- 1629930
- 1629931
- 1629933
- 1629934
- 1629935
- 1629936
- 1629938
- 1648948
- 1648949
- 1634352
- Hearing Panel
- Eynon G
- McManus RC
- Gilmour J
- Hearing Type
- Written hearing
- Category
- Pipelines
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Sugden Field
- NTS 73L
- Well licence
- Facility licence
- Directive 008
- Directive 009
- Directive 051
- Directive 056
- Directive 019
- Environmental impact
- Socio-economic effect
- Groundwater
- Surface water
- Water conservation
- Odor
- Emission
- Wildlife
- Evaluation
- Compliance
- Consultation
- Traffic survey
- Sparky FM
- Mannville GP
- Colorado GP
- Cold Lake area
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
- 2011 ABERCB 019
- Notes
- Amendment issued 13 September 2011
- Change to legal citation effective January 2011
- Interveners
- Minnie Lake Conservation Society
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- The panel instructs CNRL to
- set surface casing for all wells at an elevation no shallower than 440 m above mean sea level,
- conduct cement evaluation logs of the surface casing in each well after drilling to total depth and provide them to the Board for review and approval after setting the production casing,
- run cement evaluation logs of the production casing in each well and provide them to the Board for review and approval before perforating the wells, and
- refrain from conducting drilling operations, with the exception of well site construction operations, from June 1 until after September 5 (Labour Day).
- CNRL committed to
- complete a minimum of two bottoms-up circulations to ensure that the hole is clean,
- conduct wiper trips using a stabilizer blade assembly to ensure that the hole is properly cleaned of drilling mud and cuttings and has sufficient filter cake to protect the shallow aquifers or permeable zones, minimizing the potential for bridging-off or loss of circulation,
- use semirigid centralizers on every collar on both casing strings,
- use a minimum of 6 m3 of good cement returns prior to displacement of the cement from the inside of the casing string with a wiper plug,
- perform gas migration and surface casing vent flow tests within 90 days of rig release to confirm its procedures will successfully provide hydraulic isolation, and
- promptly address concerns with odours, through either its own internal processes or external partners such as LICA, where appropriate.
- Location
- 15-10-061-08W4
- 13-10-061-08W4
- 08-15-061-08W4
- 15-22-061-08W4
- 10-16-061-08W4
- 07-22-061-08W4
- 15-15-061-08W4
- 13-15-061-08W4
- 09-15-060-04W4
Decision 2013-18
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4516
- Application Number
- 1769924
- Title
- Decision 2013-018 : Proceeding into odours and emissions in the Peace River area : organizational meeting report
- Date
- 2013
- Title
- Decision 2013-018 : Proceeding into odours and emissions in the Peace River area : organizational meeting report
- Date
- 2013
- Application Number
- 1769924
- Hearing Panel
- McManus BT
- Macken C
- Engen T
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Descriptors
- Odor
- Emission
- Peace River area
- Three Creeks area
- Reno area
- Seal Lake area
- Heavy oil project
- Recommendation
- Impact
- Impact assessment
- Health
- Transportation corridor
- Vegetation
- Livestock
- Farm crop
- Safety
- Freedom of information
- Monitoring
- Evaluation
- Vapor
- Noise (sound)
- Environmental impact
- Soil pollution
- Water pollution
- Air pollution
- Gas flaring
- Combustion
- Air quality
- Socio-economic effect
- Legal References
- Responsible Energy Development Act (REDA) D17
- AER Rules of Practice
- 2013 ABAER 018
- Notes
- Change to legal citation effective January 2011
- Approval
- No approval required
Decision 2014-05
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4524
- Application Number
- 1769924
- Title
- Decision 2014-005 : Report of recommendations on odours and emissions in the Peace River area
- Date
- 2014
- Title
- Decision 2014-005 : Report of recommendations on odours and emissions in the Peace River area
- Date
- 2014
- Application Number
- 1769924
- Hearing Panel
- McManus BT
- Macken C
- Engen T
- McManus RC
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Environment/Pollution
- Descriptors
- Odor
- Emission
- Peace River area
- Heavy oil project
- Recommendation
- Impact
- Impact assessment
- Health
- Transportation corridor
- Vegetation
- Livestock
- Farm crop
- Safety
- Freedom of information
- Monitoring
- Evaluation
- Vapor
- Noise (sound)
- Environmental impact
- Soil pollution
- Water pollution
- Air pollution
- Gas flaring
- Combustion
- Air quality
- Socio-economic effect
- Decision 2013-018
- DIR 060
- Three Creeks area
- Reno area
- Seal Lake area
- Legal References
- Responsible Energy Development Act (REDA) D17
- AER Rules of Practice
- 2014 ABAER 005
- Notes
- Change to legal citation effective January 2011
- Approval
- No approval required
Decision E59-(p.362)
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision423
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Title
- Examiners report on inquiry into contravention of section 40 (A) of the Drilling and Production Regulations at Richfield Leduc No. 2 battery by venting unburned gas, 1959
- Date
- 1959
- Title
- Examiners report on inquiry into contravention of section 40 (A) of the Drilling and Production Regulations at Richfield Leduc No. 2 battery by venting unburned gas, 1959
- Date
- 1959
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Hearing Panel
- Bohme VE
- Craig DR
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Inquiry
- Descriptors
- Inquiry
- Odor
- Gas flaring
- Battery
- Calmar area
- Notes
- Examiners report on inquiry into evidence of gas being vented from the flare line of the subject battery, and that the gas was not burning.
Decision E59-(p.365)
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision421
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Title
- Examiners report on inquiry into contravention of section 40 (A) of the Drilling and Production Regulations at Vanalta Leduc No. 1 battery by venting unburned gas, 1959
- Date
- 1959
- Title
- Examiners report on inquiry into contravention of section 40 (A) of the Drilling and Production Regulations at Vanalta Leduc No. 1 battery by venting unburned gas, 1959
- Date
- 1959
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Hearing Panel
- Bohme VE
- Craig DR
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Inquiry
- Descriptors
- Gas flaring
- Battery
- Odor
- Inquiry
- Notes
- Examiners report on inquiry on Vanalta battery no.1 regarding gas venting to the atmosphere without burning it; inquiry follows complaints from Calmar residents about obnoxious odors.
Decision E60-(p.004)
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision701
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Title
- Examiners report on inquiry into the contravention of section 40A of the Drilling and Production Regulations at Calmar west battery by venting unburned gas, 1960
- Date
- 1960
- Title
- Examiners report on inquiry into the contravention of section 40A of the Drilling and Production Regulations at Calmar west battery by venting unburned gas, 1960
- Date
- 1960
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Hearing Panel
- Bohme VE
- Craig DR
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Inquiry
- Descriptors
- Battery
- Inquiry
- Air pollution
- Gas flaring
- Calmar area
- Odor
- Legal References
- Drilling and Production Regulation S40
- Notes
- Examiners report on inquiry following a complaint regarding obnoxious odors; gas was being vented from the flare line of the subject battery and the gas was not burning; Examiners recommended that Calmar west #1 well remain closed in until the flare pit at this battery was emptied.
Decision E73-(p.021)
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3623
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Title
- Examiners report on inquiry into the operation of the battery Sun Penhold with regard to an alleged contravention of section 7.070, subsection (7) of the Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations by venting unburned gas
- Date
- 1973
- Title
- Examiners report on inquiry into the operation of the battery Sun Penhold with regard to an alleged contravention of section 7.070, subsection (7) of the Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations by venting unburned gas
- Date
- 1973
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Hearing Panel
- Bohme VE
- Strom NA
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Inquiry
- Descriptors
- Battery
- Inquiry
- Air pollution
- Gas flaring
- Odor
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.070