Narrow Results By
Applicant
- AEC Pipelines 1
- Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited 1
- Alberta Oil Sands Pipeline Ltd. 1
- Alberta Power Limited 1
- Albion Petroleum Corporation Limited 1
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited 1
- Apache Canada Ltd. 1
- C-H Synfuels Ltd. 1
- CE Alberta BioClean Ltd. 1
- CanNat Resources Inc. 1
- Canadian Natural Resources Limited 1
- Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNRL) 1
Decision 80-27
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2012
- Applicant
- Luscar Ltd.
- Application Number
- 800542
- 800598
- 800626
- Title
- Decision on application by Luscar Ltd., 1980 (compressor station and pipeline applications Round Hill - Dodds area)
- Date
- 1980
- Title
- Decision on application by Luscar Ltd., 1980 (compressor station and pipeline applications Round Hill - Dodds area)
- Date
- 1980
- Applicant
- Luscar Ltd.
- Application Number
- 800542
- 800598
- 800626
- Hearing Panel
- Evans RG
- Wolff WH
- Brushett ER
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Pipelines
- Descriptors
- Battery
- Camrose area
- Compressor station
- Gas pipeline
- Gathering line
- Pipeline construction permit
- Environmental impact
- ID-80-02
- Locating
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 83H
- Pollution
- Notes
- Decision 80-27 on application No. 800542 to construct a gas battery and 920 KW gas compressor station in LSD 4-35-48-18 W4M, on application No. 800598 to construct pipeline to transport gas from wells to proposed compressor station and on application No. 800626 to construct pipeline to transport gas from proposed compressor station to delivery point in LSD 13-20-48-16 W4M; Examiners hearing 1980-09-30 adjourned to Board hearing 1980-11-18
- Interveners
- Diamond E Ranch
- Bowthorpe, B.
- Anderson, R.A.
- Nahirniak, T.
- Stauffer, H.
Decision 81-08
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1759
- Applicant
- Rampart Resources Ltd.
- Scion Petroleum Engineering Limited
- Application Number
- 800784
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Rampart Resources Ltd., 1981 (sweet gas plant Joffre field)
- Date
- 1981
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Rampart Resources Ltd., 1981 (sweet gas plant Joffre field)
- Date
- 1981
- Application Number
- 800784
- Hearing Panel
- Evans RG
- Mazurek LA
- Yu JNG
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Gas processing plant
- Joffre field
- Design criteria
- Environmental impact
- Flare
- Gas conservation
- Land value
- Liquefied natural gas
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 83A
- Petroleum conservation
- Pollution
- Storage facility
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
- Notes
- ERCB Examiners report No. E81-8 on application No. 800784 by SCION on behalf of RAMPART to construct and operate a gas processing plant to process sweet gas in LSD 10-18-38-26 W4M.
- Interveners
- Allen, S.J.
Decision 81-10
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1998
- Applicant
- Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
- Application Number
- 800853
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene)
- Date
- 1981
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene)
- Date
- 1981
- Applicant
- Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
- Application Number
- 800853
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Strom NA
- Webber HJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Chemical plant
- Ethylene
- Industrial development permit
- Red Deer area
- Air quality
- Benefit cost analysis
- Design criteria
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Ethane
- Ethane - raw material
- Forecasting
- Land use
- Marketing
- Natural gas - fuel
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 83A
- Pollution
- Raw material
- Socio-economic effect
- Supply (economics)
- Water
- Water quality
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- Decision 81-10 on application No. 800853 to use ethane as feedstock and natural gas as fuel to manufacture ethylene in plant to be constructed (unit 3) adjacent to present facilities (units 1&2) near Joffre (TP.38, R.25, W4M); Board hearing 1981-04-07/08
- Interveners
- Preserve Agricultural Land
- Red Deer Regional Planning Commission
- Hainsworth, B.W.
- Chessor, D.
- Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
- Esso Chemical Canada
- Du Pont Canada Inc.
- Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
- NOVA, AN ALBERTA CORPORATION
- Shell Canada Limited
- Union Carbide Canada Limited
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Esso Resources Canada Limited
- Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
- Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
- Sulpetro Limited
- Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Decision 81-16
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1992
- Applicant
- Nova, an Alberta Corporation
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 800910
- Title
- Decision on application by Nova, an Alberta Corporation and Shell Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
- Date
- 1981
- Title
- Decision on application by Nova, an Alberta Corporation and Shell Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
- Date
- 1981
- Application Number
- 800910
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Strom NA
- Webber HJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Chemical plant
- Ethylene homopolymer
- Industrial development permit
- Red Deer area
- Demand (economics)
- Economic analysis
- Environmental impact
- Ethylene - raw material
- Land use
- Locating
- Marketing
- Natural gas - fuel
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 83A
- Plant location
- Pollution
- Socio-economic effect
- Supply (economics)
- Water quality
- Water supply
- Notes
- Decision 81-16 on application No. 800910 to use ethylene as feedstock and gas as fuel to manufacture polyethylene at a LINEAR low-density polyethylene plant to be constructed on the site of Alberta gas ethylene'S existing ethylene plant east of Red Deer (TP.38-40, R.23-27, W4M).
- Interveners
- Preserve Agricultural Land
- Alberta Institute of Agrologists Red Deer Branch
- F.E.M. Farms
- Hainsworth, J.W.
- Federation of Alberta Naturalists Land Use Committee
- Red Deer Regional Planning Commission
- Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
- Union Carbide Canada Limited
- Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
- Du Pont Canada Inc.
- Esso Chemical Canada
Decision 81-24
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1742
- Applicant
- Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
- Application Number
- 810447
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Norcen Energy Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas compressor station Fort Saskatchewan field)
- Date
- 1981
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Norcen Energy Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas compressor station Fort Saskatchewan field)
- Date
- 1981
- Applicant
- Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
- Application Number
- 810447
- Hearing Panel
- Wolff WH
- Allman RJ
- Dilay JD
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Enhanced recovery
- Descriptors
- Compressor station
- Fort Saskatchewan field
- Gas pipeline
- Gathering line
- Deliverability
- Design criteria
- Environmental impact
- ID-80-02
- Gas recovery
- Locating
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 83H
- Pipeline design
- Pollution
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.002
- Notes
- ERCB Examiners report E81-24 on application No. 810447 to construct and operate a compressor station in LSD 9-28-54-22 W4M to serve an existing gas gathering system in the Fort Saskatchewan field.
- Interveners
- Pierce, M.
Decision 81-36
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1731
- Applicant
- Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
- Application Number
- 810534
- 810649
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Norcen Energy Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas processing plant Joarcam field)
- Date
- 1981
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Norcen Energy Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas processing plant Joarcam field)
- Date
- 1981
- Applicant
- Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
- Application Number
- 810534
- 810649
- Hearing Panel
- Pearson DG
- Brushett ER
- Nichol JR
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Gas processing plant
- Joarcam field
- Battery
- Community relations
- Dissolved gas
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Gas conservation
- Locating
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 83H
- Pollution
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
- Notes
- ERCB Examiners report No. E81-36 on application No. 810534 to construct & operate plant in LSD 8-14-5--22 W4M approved under approval No. 3302 (application No. 800887) and on proceeding No. 810649 initiated by the Board to reconsider approval No. 3302; Examiners' hearing 81-09-28/29/30
- Interveners
- Hansen, S.A.
- Hansen, H.J.
- Otto, R.L.
- Otto, A.D.
- Knopp, A.J.
- Knopp, B.
- Ogoniski, B.
Decision 82-20
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1128
- Applicant
- Alberta Power Limited
- Application Number
- 820247
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Alberta Power Ltd., 1982 (144-KV transmission line Clairemont Lake-Friedenstal)
- Date
- 1982
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Alberta Power Ltd., 1982 (144-KV transmission line Clairemont Lake-Friedenstal)
- Date
- 1982
- Applicant
- Alberta Power Limited
- Application Number
- 820247
- Hearing Panel
- Pow JR
- Yu JNG
- Allman RJ
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Utilities
- Category
- Transmission line
- Descriptors
- Electric substation
- Grande Prairie area
- Transmission line
- Electric power demand
- Environmental impact
- Failure
- Locating
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 83M
- NTS 84D
- Reliability
- Route selection
- Site survey
- Legal References
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S12
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S16
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S20
- Notes
- ERCB Examiners report E82-20 on application No. 820247 to construct & operate a substation at Clairmont Lake near Grande Prairie and 144-KV transmission line from proposed substation at Fairview, and an addition to existing Rycroft substation (TP.72-82, R.1-5, W6M).
- Interveners
- Woronuk, D.
- The Village of Rycroft
- Municipal District of Spirit River
Decision 82-33
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1119
- Applicant
- Union Oil Company of Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 820819
- 820846
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Union Oil Company of Canada Limited, 1982 (gas battery compressor station, and gathering system Boyer field)
- Date
- 1982
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Union Oil Company of Canada Limited, 1982 (gas battery compressor station, and gathering system Boyer field)
- Date
- 1982
- Applicant
- Union Oil Company of Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 820819
- 820846
- Hearing Panel
- Bellows LA
- Dilay JD
- Houlihan RN
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Pipelines
- Descriptors
- Battery
- Boyer field
- Compressor station
- Gas pipeline
- Gathering line
- Pipeline construction permit
- Agricultural land
- Environmental impact
- ID-80-02
- Locating
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 84F
- Plant location
- Pollution
- Site survey
- Legal References
- Pipeline Act
- Notes
- ERCB Examiners report E82-33 on application No. 820819 to construct & operate a gas battery and compressor station and on application No. 820846 for gathering system (TP.101-102, R.23-24, W5M).
- Interveners
- Local Residents' Group
Decision 82-34
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1118
- Applicant
- TransAlta Utilities Corporation
- Application Number
- 820875
- Title
- Examiners report on application by TransAlta Utilities Corporation, 1982 (240/138 KV Crossfield substation CP 64S)
- Date
- 1982
- Title
- Examiners report on application by TransAlta Utilities Corporation, 1982 (240/138 KV Crossfield substation CP 64S)
- Date
- 1982
- Applicant
- TransAlta Utilities Corporation
- Application Number
- 820875
- Hearing Panel
- Pow JR
- Homeniuk TF
- Paterson RG
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Utilities
- Category
- Electric power
- Descriptors
- Crossfield Airdrie area
- Electric substation
- Capacity
- Electric power demand
- Expansion
- Noise (sound)
- Pollution
- Reliability
- Legal References
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S12
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S16
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S20
- Notes
- ERCB Examiners report E82-34 on application No. 820875 to expand & operate Crossfield substation 64S.
- Interveners
- Sackett, K.G.
Decision 82-36
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2043
- Applicant
- Albion Petroleum Corporation Limited
- Application Number
- 820244
- Title
- Decision on application by Albion Petroleum Corporation Ltd., 1982 (experimental in situ oil sands scheme in the Bonnyville area)
- Date
- 1982
- Title
- Decision on application by Albion Petroleum Corporation Ltd., 1982 (experimental in situ oil sands scheme in the Bonnyville area)
- Date
- 1982
- Applicant
- Albion Petroleum Corporation Limited
- Application Number
- 820244
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Strom NA
- Goodman CJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Bonnyville area
- Cyclic steam injection
- In situ
- Steam injection
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Air quality
- Colony sand
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Grand Rapids Fm
- Land use
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 73L
- Pilot scale
- Pollution
- Producing equipment
- Safety
- Waste disposal
- Water disposal
- Water supply
- Well pattern
- Well spacing
- Notes
- Decision 82-36 on application No. 820244 for an experimental oil sands scheme in section 12-61-6 W4M to recover bitumen from the Colony sand of the Cold Lake-upper Grand Rapids oil sand deposit by drilling 17 slant hole wells and completing an existing evaluation well to form an 18-well pattern an using cyclic steam injection.
- Interveners
- Community Advisory Committee
- W-32 Corporation Limited
- Six-Vee Enterprises Limited
- BP Exploration Canada Limited
Decision 83-01
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2465
- Applicant
- Champlin Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 821106
- Title
- Decision on application by Champlin Canada Ltd., 1983 (application for a well licence)
- Date
- 1983
- Title
- Decision on application by Champlin Canada Ltd., 1983 (application for a well licence)
- Date
- 1983
- Applicant
- Champlin Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 821106
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Goodman CJ
- Morin EJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Lanaway field
- Well licence
- Cost analysis
- Environmental impact
- Flare
- Geologic interpretation
- Locating
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 82O
- Oil producing
- Pollution
- Producing equipment
- Target area
- Viking Fm
- Well site
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S17
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Notes
- Decision No. D83-1 on application No. 821106 for well licence to reenter abandoned well Amoco Lanaway 11-16-35-3 W5M to recomplete well to obtain oil production from Viking FM.
- Interveners
- Tingle, S.M.
- Tingle, G.
- Location
- 11-16-035-03W5
Decision 83-04
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1201
- Applicant
- Citadel Resources Ltd.
- Scion Petroleum Engineering Limited
- Application Number
- 820763
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Citadel Resources Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing plant Sundre area)
- Date
- 1983
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Citadel Resources Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing plant Sundre area)
- Date
- 1983
- Application Number
- 820763
- Hearing Panel
- Homeniuk TF
- Mazurek LA
- Nichol JR
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Gas processing plant
- Sour gas
- Sundre area
- Air pollution
- Air quality
- Design criteria
- Emergency procedure
- Emission
- Health
- Locating
- Monitoring
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 82O
- Plant location
- Safety
- Sulphur dioxide
- Truck
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Notes
- Examiners report E83-4 on application No. 820763 by Scion Petroleum & Gildex Ltd. on behalf of Citadel for approval to construct a sour gas processing plant in LSD 13-20-33-5 W5M; Examiners hearing 1982-10-27 adjourned to 1982-11-25
- Interveners
- Residents in the County of Mountainview
- Alberda, R.
Decision 83-13
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1192
- Applicant
- Citadel Resources Ltd.
- Scion Petroleum Engineering Limited
- Application Number
- 830198
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Citadel Resources Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing plant Sundre area)
- Date
- 1983
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Citadel Resources Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing plant Sundre area)
- Date
- 1983
- Application Number
- 830198
- Hearing Panel
- Homeniuk TF
- Mazurek LA
- Nichol JR
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Caroline field
- Gas processing plant
- Sour gas
- Emergency procedure
- Environmental impact
- Hydrogen sulphide removal
- Land value
- Locating
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 82O
- Pollution
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Notes
- ERCB Examiners report E83-13 on application No. 830198 by Scion Petroleum on behalf of Citadel for approval to construct a sour gas processing plant in LSD 3 of section 26, TP.33, R.6 W5M in the Caroline field.
- Interveners
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- MHL & Associates Ltd.
- Petersen, E.
- Petersen, G.
Decision 84-26
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1148
- Applicant
- PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 831102
- Title
- Examiners report on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1984 (experimental in situ scheme Lindbergh area)
- Date
- 1984
- Title
- Examiners report on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1984 (experimental in situ scheme Lindbergh area)
- Date
- 1984
- Applicant
- PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 831102
- Hearing Panel
- Warne GA
- Moloney JK
- Remmer WG
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Carbon dioxide injection
- Cyclic steam injection
- Elk Point area
- In situ
- Lindbergh area
- Steam injection
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Thermal recovery
- Air quality
- Communication
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Hydrogen sulphide
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 73E
- Pilot scale
- Pollution
- Sulphur dioxide
- Water well
- Legal References
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
- Notes
- ERCB Examiners report E84-26 on application No. 831102 for approval of an experimental scheme to cyclicly stimulate 10 existing wells in section 3, TP.56, R.6 W4M using steam and carbon dioxide to evaluate the technical and economic feasibility of this recovery method in the Cold Lake Wabiskaw McMurray oil sands deposit.
- Interveners
- Shymkiw, J.
- Shymkiw, Mrs.J.
- Shymkiw, H.
- Shymkiw, Mrs.H.
- Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Decision 85-02
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1689
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Resources Limited
- Application Number
- 841072
- Title
- Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1985 (Jumping Pound sulphur forming project)
- Date
- 1985
- Title
- Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1985 (Jumping Pound sulphur forming project)
- Date
- 1985
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Resources Limited
- Application Number
- 841072
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- Goodman CJ
- Paterson RG
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Sulphur
- Descriptors
- Gas processing plant
- Sulphur
- Environmental impact
- Export
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 82O
- Pollution
- Producing
- Railroad
- Safety
- Transportation
- Truck
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S15.050
- Notes
- Decision D85-2 on application No. 841072 to construct and operate sulphur forming facilities using rotoform process at its Jumping Pound gas plant in section 13-25-5 W5M.
- Interveners
- Copithorne, R.A.
- Rhodes, C.H.
Decision 85-06
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1686
- Applicant
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 840739
- Title
- Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Experimental in situ scheme Lindbergh sector)
- Date
- 1985
- Title
- Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Experimental in situ scheme Lindbergh sector)
- Date
- 1985
- Applicant
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 840739
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Strom NA
- Bellows LA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Cyclic steam injection
- Elk Point area
- In situ
- Lindbergh area
- Steam injection
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Thermal recovery
- Air quality
- Community relations
- Cummings Fm
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Land value
- Monitoring
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 73E
- Pilot scale
- Pollution
- Safety
- Well spacing
- Legal References
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
- Notes
- Decision D85-6 on application No. 840739 for approval to develop a 16 well cyclic steam experimental project in the Cummings zone of the Cold Lake Wabiskaw-McMurray oil sands deposit (section 10-56-6 W4M); resulted in approval No. 4448
- Interveners
- Yaremkevich, D.
- Kadutski, D.
- Elk Point Surface Rights Association
- Group of Elk Point-Lindbergh Area Residents
- Town of Elk Point
- County of Vermillion River
- County of St.Paul
Decision 85-07
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1685
- Applicant
- PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 840736
- 840986
- Title
- Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1985 (reduced well spacing and cleaning plant Lindbergh sector)
- Date
- 1985
- Title
- Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1985 (reduced well spacing and cleaning plant Lindbergh sector)
- Date
- 1985
- Applicant
- PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 840736
- 840986
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Strom NA
- Bellows LA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Spacing
- Descriptors
- Drilling spacing unit
- In situ
- Industrial plant
- Lindbergh area
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Thermal recovery
- Bitumen
- Cleaning
- Community relations
- Contamination
- Cummings Fm
- Directional well
- Environmental impact
- Groundwater
- Monitoring
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 73E
- Oil pipeline
- Solid hydrocarbon
- Transportation
- Truck
- Water disposal
- Well spacing
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.002
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.030
- Notes
- Decision D85-7 on application No. 840736 and No. 840986 to reduce well spacing for primary recovery from Cummings zone-Cold Lake-Wabiskaw-McMurray oil sands deposit and to construct and operate a cleaning plant to handle hydrocarbon production trucked from various PanCanadian wells (in section 3-56-6 W4M); Board hearing 84-12-11/12; resulted in Order No. Misc 8501
- Interveners
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
- Shymkiw, J.
- Shymkiw, Mrs.J.
- Shymkiw, H.
- Shymikiw, Mrs.H.
- Kozicky, C.
- Kozicky, Mrs.C.
- Elk Point Surface Rights Association
- Group of Elk Point-Lindbergh Area Residents
- Town of Elk Point
- County of St. Paul
Decision 85-15
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1680
- Applicant
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
- Application Number
- 840227
- Title
- Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1985 (commercial oil sands project (phase 1) Lindbergh sector)
- Date
- 1985
- Title
- Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1985 (commercial oil sands project (phase 1) Lindbergh sector)
- Date
- 1985
- Applicant
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
- Application Number
- 840227
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Strom NA
- Bellows LA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Carbon dioxide injection
- Cyclic steam injection
- Elk Point area
- Elk Point project
- In situ
- Industrial plant
- Lindbergh field
- Steam flooding
- Steam injection
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Thermal recovery
- Air quality
- Bitumen
- Cleaning
- Contamination
- Disposal well
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- ID-80-02
- Hydrogen sulphide
- Land reclamation
- Land use
- Locating
- Monitoring
- NTS 73E
- Noise (sound)
- Pollution
- Recovery factor
- Recycling
- Socio-economic effect
- Waste disposal
- Water disposal
- Water supply
- Water well
- Well spacing
- Legal References
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
- Notes
- Decision D85-15 (with addendum) on application No. 840227 for approval of phase 1 of a three phase commercial oil sands project (Elk Point project) in Lindbergh sector of Cold Lake oil sands deposits, consisting of 13-well cyclic steam and steam flood stimulation project on 2 Hectare well spacing and a 640 CU. M./day bitumen cleaning plant (TP.54-46, R.5-7 W4M); Board hearing 1985-01-08/09/12/15-18/21-23
- Interveners
- Kadutski, D.
- Kadutski, C.
- Kadutski, M.
- Elk Point Surface Rights Association
- Keith, L.
- Group of Elk Point -Lindbergh Area Residents
- Town of Elk Point
- County of St. Paul
- Westmin Resources Limited
Decision 85-20
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision828
- Applicant
- Koch Exploration Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 841220
- Title
- Examiner report on application by Koch Exploration Canada Ltd., 1985 (experimental oil sands project Beaverdam sector)
- Date
- 1985
- Title
- Examiner report on application by Koch Exploration Canada Ltd., 1985 (experimental oil sands project Beaverdam sector)
- Date
- 1985
- Applicant
- Koch Exploration Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 841220
- Hearing Panel
- Homeniuk TF
- Lillo HO
- Nichol JR
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Cyclic steam injection
- In situ
- Steam injection
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Thermal recovery
- Community relations
- Disposal well
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Grand Rapids Fm
- Injection well
- Locating
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 73L
- Pilot scale
- Safety
- Legal References
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
- Notes
- ERCB Examiners report E85-20 on application No. 841220 to expand existing experimental cyclic steam project in the west half of section 19-61-4 W4M for recovery of bitumen from Cold Lake upper Grand Rapids oil sands deposit.
- Interveners
- Beaunoyer, L.
- Beaunoyer, D.
- Bonny Glen Farms, Limited
- Campeau, L.
- Suncor Inc.
Decision 85-42
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision968
- Applicant
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 850428
- 850798
- Title
- Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Commercial oil sands project and water disposal scheme Lindbergh sector)
- Date
- 1985
- Title
- Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Commercial oil sands project and water disposal scheme Lindbergh sector)
- Date
- 1985
- Applicant
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 850428
- 850798
- Hearing Panel
- Strom NA
- Bellows LA
- Homeniuk TF
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Cyclic steam injection
- Dome Lindbergh project
- In situ
- Lindbergh area
- Produced water
- Steam injection
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Oil sands project
- Thermal recovery
- Water disposal
- Agricultural land
- Air quality
- Cummings Fm
- Directional well
- Disposal well
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Groundwater
- Land reclamation
- Locating
- Monitoring
- NTS 73E
- Noise (sound)
- Planning
- Pollution
- Recycling
- Waste disposal
- Water producing
- Water supply
- Legal References
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
- Notes
- Decision D85-42 on application No. 850428 and 850798 by Dome on behalf of itself & its partners Sulpetro and CNG producing Company for a commercial oil sands deposit in TP.53-56, R.4-6, W4M and water disposal scheme, Lindbergh sector (being an expansion of current experimental project to commercial scale); Board hearing 1984-11-04/05/06
- Interveners
- Miller, L.
- Kozicky, C.
- Melnyk, A.
- Elk Point Surface Rights Association
- Town of Elk Point
- Westmin Resources Limited