77 records – page 1 of 4.

Decision 80-27

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2012
Applicant
Luscar Ltd.
Application Number
800542
800598
800626
Title
Decision on application by Luscar Ltd., 1980 (compressor station and pipeline applications Round Hill - Dodds area)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Luscar Ltd., 1980 (compressor station and pipeline applications Round Hill - Dodds area)
Date
1980
Applicant
Luscar Ltd.
Application Number
800542
800598
800626
Hearing Panel
Evans RG
Wolff WH
Brushett ER
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Battery
Camrose area
Compressor station
Gas pipeline
Gathering line
Pipeline construction permit
Environmental impact
ID-80-02
Locating
Noise (sound)
NTS 83H
Pollution
Notes
Decision 80-27 on application No. 800542 to construct a gas battery and 920 KW gas compressor station in LSD 4-35-48-18 W4M, on application No. 800598 to construct pipeline to transport gas from wells to proposed compressor station and on application No. 800626 to construct pipeline to transport gas from proposed compressor station to delivery point in LSD 13-20-48-16 W4M; Examiners hearing 1980-09-30 adjourned to Board hearing 1980-11-18
Interveners
Diamond E Ranch
Bowthorpe, B.
Anderson, R.A.
Nahirniak, T.
Stauffer, H.
Less detail

Decision 81-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1759
Applicant
Rampart Resources Ltd.
Scion Petroleum Engineering Limited
Application Number
800784
Title
Examiners report on application by Rampart Resources Ltd., 1981 (sweet gas plant Joffre field)
Date
1981
Title
Examiners report on application by Rampart Resources Ltd., 1981 (sweet gas plant Joffre field)
Date
1981
Applicant
Rampart Resources Ltd.
Scion Petroleum Engineering Limited
Application Number
800784
Hearing Panel
Evans RG
Mazurek LA
Yu JNG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Joffre field
Design criteria
Environmental impact
Flare
Gas conservation
Land value
Liquefied natural gas
Noise (sound)
NTS 83A
Petroleum conservation
Pollution
Storage facility
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
ERCB Examiners report No. E81-8 on application No. 800784 by SCION on behalf of RAMPART to construct and operate a gas processing plant to process sweet gas in LSD 10-18-38-26 W4M.
Interveners
Allen, S.J.
Less detail

Decision 81-10

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1998
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Application Number
800853
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene)
Date
1981
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Application Number
800853
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Webber HJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Ethylene
Industrial development permit
Red Deer area
Air quality
Benefit cost analysis
Design criteria
Emission
Environmental impact
Ethane
Ethane - raw material
Forecasting
Land use
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
Noise (sound)
NTS 83A
Pollution
Raw material
Socio-economic effect
Supply (economics)
Water
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 81-10 on application No. 800853 to use ethane as feedstock and natural gas as fuel to manufacture ethylene in plant to be constructed (unit 3) adjacent to present facilities (units 1&2) near Joffre (TP.38, R.25, W4M); Board hearing 1981-04-07/08
Interveners
Preserve Agricultural Land
Red Deer Regional Planning Commission
Hainsworth, B.W.
Chessor, D.
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Esso Chemical Canada
Du Pont Canada Inc.
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
NOVA, AN ALBERTA CORPORATION
Shell Canada Limited
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Esso Resources Canada Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Sulpetro Limited
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 81-16

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1992
Applicant
Nova, an Alberta Corporation
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
800910
Title
Decision on application by Nova, an Alberta Corporation and Shell Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Nova, an Alberta Corporation and Shell Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
Date
1981
Applicant
Nova, an Alberta Corporation
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
800910
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Webber HJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Ethylene homopolymer
Industrial development permit
Red Deer area
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Ethylene - raw material
Land use
Locating
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
Noise (sound)
NTS 83A
Plant location
Pollution
Socio-economic effect
Supply (economics)
Water quality
Water supply
Notes
Decision 81-16 on application No. 800910 to use ethylene as feedstock and gas as fuel to manufacture polyethylene at a LINEAR low-density polyethylene plant to be constructed on the site of Alberta gas ethylene'S existing ethylene plant east of Red Deer (TP.38-40, R.23-27, W4M).
Interveners
Preserve Agricultural Land
Alberta Institute of Agrologists Red Deer Branch
F.E.M. Farms
Hainsworth, J.W.
Federation of Alberta Naturalists Land Use Committee
Red Deer Regional Planning Commission
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Du Pont Canada Inc.
Esso Chemical Canada
Less detail

Decision 81-24

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1742
Applicant
Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
Application Number
810447
Title
Examiners report on application by Norcen Energy Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas compressor station Fort Saskatchewan field)
Date
1981
Title
Examiners report on application by Norcen Energy Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas compressor station Fort Saskatchewan field)
Date
1981
Applicant
Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
Application Number
810447
Hearing Panel
Wolff WH
Allman RJ
Dilay JD
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Compressor station
Fort Saskatchewan field
Gas pipeline
Gathering line
Deliverability
Design criteria
Environmental impact
ID-80-02
Gas recovery
Locating
Noise (sound)
NTS 83H
Pipeline design
Pollution
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.002
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E81-24 on application No. 810447 to construct and operate a compressor station in LSD 9-28-54-22 W4M to serve an existing gas gathering system in the Fort Saskatchewan field.
Interveners
Pierce, M.
Less detail

Decision 81-36

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1731
Applicant
Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
Application Number
810534
810649
Title
Examiners report on application by Norcen Energy Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas processing plant Joarcam field)
Date
1981
Title
Examiners report on application by Norcen Energy Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas processing plant Joarcam field)
Date
1981
Applicant
Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
Application Number
810534
810649
Hearing Panel
Pearson DG
Brushett ER
Nichol JR
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Joarcam field
Battery
Community relations
Dissolved gas
Emission
Environmental impact
Gas conservation
Locating
Noise (sound)
NTS 83H
Pollution
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
ERCB Examiners report No. E81-36 on application No. 810534 to construct & operate plant in LSD 8-14-5--22 W4M approved under approval No. 3302 (application No. 800887) and on proceeding No. 810649 initiated by the Board to reconsider approval No. 3302; Examiners' hearing 81-09-28/29/30
Interveners
Hansen, S.A.
Hansen, H.J.
Otto, R.L.
Otto, A.D.
Knopp, A.J.
Knopp, B.
Ogoniski, B.
Less detail

Decision 82-20

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1128
Applicant
Alberta Power Limited
Application Number
820247
Title
Examiners report on application by Alberta Power Ltd., 1982 (144-KV transmission line Clairemont Lake-Friedenstal)
Date
1982
Title
Examiners report on application by Alberta Power Ltd., 1982 (144-KV transmission line Clairemont Lake-Friedenstal)
Date
1982
Applicant
Alberta Power Limited
Application Number
820247
Hearing Panel
Pow JR
Yu JNG
Allman RJ
Hearing Type
Examiners
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Electric substation
Grande Prairie area
Transmission line
Electric power demand
Environmental impact
Failure
Locating
Noise (sound)
NTS 83M
NTS 84D
Reliability
Route selection
Site survey
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S12
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S16
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S20
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E82-20 on application No. 820247 to construct & operate a substation at Clairmont Lake near Grande Prairie and 144-KV transmission line from proposed substation at Fairview, and an addition to existing Rycroft substation (TP.72-82, R.1-5, W6M).
Interveners
Woronuk, D.
The Village of Rycroft
Municipal District of Spirit River
Less detail

Decision 82-33

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1119
Applicant
Union Oil Company of Canada Limited
Application Number
820819
820846
Title
Examiners report on application by Union Oil Company of Canada Limited, 1982 (gas battery compressor station, and gathering system Boyer field)
Date
1982
Title
Examiners report on application by Union Oil Company of Canada Limited, 1982 (gas battery compressor station, and gathering system Boyer field)
Date
1982
Applicant
Union Oil Company of Canada Limited
Application Number
820819
820846
Hearing Panel
Bellows LA
Dilay JD
Houlihan RN
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Battery
Boyer field
Compressor station
Gas pipeline
Gathering line
Pipeline construction permit
Agricultural land
Environmental impact
ID-80-02
Locating
Noise (sound)
NTS 84F
Plant location
Pollution
Site survey
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E82-33 on application No. 820819 to construct & operate a gas battery and compressor station and on application No. 820846 for gathering system (TP.101-102, R.23-24, W5M).
Interveners
Local Residents' Group
Less detail

Decision 82-34

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1118
Applicant
TransAlta Utilities Corporation
Application Number
820875
Title
Examiners report on application by TransAlta Utilities Corporation, 1982 (240/138 KV Crossfield substation CP 64S)
Date
1982
Title
Examiners report on application by TransAlta Utilities Corporation, 1982 (240/138 KV Crossfield substation CP 64S)
Date
1982
Applicant
TransAlta Utilities Corporation
Application Number
820875
Hearing Panel
Pow JR
Homeniuk TF
Paterson RG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Utilities
Category
Electric power
Descriptors
Crossfield Airdrie area
Electric substation
Capacity
Electric power demand
Expansion
Noise (sound)
Pollution
Reliability
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S12
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S16
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S20
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E82-34 on application No. 820875 to expand & operate Crossfield substation 64S.
Interveners
Sackett, K.G.
Less detail

Decision 82-36

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2043
Applicant
Albion Petroleum Corporation Limited
Application Number
820244
Title
Decision on application by Albion Petroleum Corporation Ltd., 1982 (experimental in situ oil sands scheme in the Bonnyville area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Albion Petroleum Corporation Ltd., 1982 (experimental in situ oil sands scheme in the Bonnyville area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Albion Petroleum Corporation Limited
Application Number
820244
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Bonnyville area
Cyclic steam injection
In situ
Steam injection
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Air quality
Colony sand
Emission
Environmental impact
Grand Rapids Fm
Land use
Noise (sound)
NTS 73L
Pilot scale
Pollution
Producing equipment
Safety
Waste disposal
Water disposal
Water supply
Well pattern
Well spacing
Notes
Decision 82-36 on application No. 820244 for an experimental oil sands scheme in section 12-61-6 W4M to recover bitumen from the Colony sand of the Cold Lake-upper Grand Rapids oil sand deposit by drilling 17 slant hole wells and completing an existing evaluation well to form an 18-well pattern an using cyclic steam injection.
Interveners
Community Advisory Committee
W-32 Corporation Limited
Six-Vee Enterprises Limited
BP Exploration Canada Limited
Less detail

Decision 83-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2465
Applicant
Champlin Canada Ltd.
Application Number
821106
Title
Decision on application by Champlin Canada Ltd., 1983 (application for a well licence)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Champlin Canada Ltd., 1983 (application for a well licence)
Date
1983
Applicant
Champlin Canada Ltd.
Application Number
821106
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Morin EJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Lanaway field
Well licence
Cost analysis
Environmental impact
Flare
Geologic interpretation
Locating
Noise (sound)
NTS 82O
Oil producing
Pollution
Producing equipment
Target area
Viking Fm
Well site
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S17
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
Decision No. D83-1 on application No. 821106 for well licence to reenter abandoned well Amoco Lanaway 11-16-35-3 W5M to recomplete well to obtain oil production from Viking FM.
Interveners
Tingle, S.M.
Tingle, G.
Location
11-16-035-03W5
Less detail

Decision 83-04

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1201
Applicant
Citadel Resources Ltd.
Scion Petroleum Engineering Limited
Application Number
820763
Title
Examiners report on application by Citadel Resources Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing plant Sundre area)
Date
1983
Title
Examiners report on application by Citadel Resources Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing plant Sundre area)
Date
1983
Applicant
Citadel Resources Ltd.
Scion Petroleum Engineering Limited
Application Number
820763
Hearing Panel
Homeniuk TF
Mazurek LA
Nichol JR
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Sundre area
Air pollution
Air quality
Design criteria
Emergency procedure
Emission
Health
Locating
Monitoring
Noise (sound)
NTS 82O
Plant location
Safety
Sulphur dioxide
Truck
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Examiners report E83-4 on application No. 820763 by Scion Petroleum & Gildex Ltd. on behalf of Citadel for approval to construct a sour gas processing plant in LSD 13-20-33-5 W5M; Examiners hearing 1982-10-27 adjourned to 1982-11-25
Interveners
Residents in the County of Mountainview
Alberda, R.
Less detail

Decision 83-13

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1192
Applicant
Citadel Resources Ltd.
Scion Petroleum Engineering Limited
Application Number
830198
Title
Examiners report on application by Citadel Resources Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing plant Sundre area)
Date
1983
Title
Examiners report on application by Citadel Resources Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing plant Sundre area)
Date
1983
Applicant
Citadel Resources Ltd.
Scion Petroleum Engineering Limited
Application Number
830198
Hearing Panel
Homeniuk TF
Mazurek LA
Nichol JR
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Caroline field
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Hydrogen sulphide removal
Land value
Locating
Noise (sound)
NTS 82O
Pollution
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E83-13 on application No. 830198 by Scion Petroleum on behalf of Citadel for approval to construct a sour gas processing plant in LSD 3 of section 26, TP.33, R.6 W5M in the Caroline field.
Interveners
Dome Petroleum Limited
MHL & Associates Ltd.
Petersen, E.
Petersen, G.
Less detail

Decision 84-26

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1148
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Application Number
831102
Title
Examiners report on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1984 (experimental in situ scheme Lindbergh area)
Date
1984
Title
Examiners report on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1984 (experimental in situ scheme Lindbergh area)
Date
1984
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Application Number
831102
Hearing Panel
Warne GA
Moloney JK
Remmer WG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Carbon dioxide injection
Cyclic steam injection
Elk Point area
In situ
Lindbergh area
Steam injection
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Air quality
Communication
Emission
Environmental impact
Hydrogen sulphide
Noise (sound)
NTS 73E
Pilot scale
Pollution
Sulphur dioxide
Water well
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E84-26 on application No. 831102 for approval of an experimental scheme to cyclicly stimulate 10 existing wells in section 3, TP.56, R.6 W4M using steam and carbon dioxide to evaluate the technical and economic feasibility of this recovery method in the Cold Lake Wabiskaw McMurray oil sands deposit.
Interveners
Shymkiw, J.
Shymkiw, Mrs.J.
Shymkiw, H.
Shymkiw, Mrs.H.
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Less detail

Decision 85-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1689
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
841072
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1985 (Jumping Pound sulphur forming project)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1985 (Jumping Pound sulphur forming project)
Date
1985
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
841072
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Goodman CJ
Paterson RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Sulphur
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Sulphur
Environmental impact
Export
Noise (sound)
NTS 82O
Pollution
Producing
Railroad
Safety
Transportation
Truck
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S15.050
Notes
Decision D85-2 on application No. 841072 to construct and operate sulphur forming facilities using rotoform process at its Jumping Pound gas plant in section 13-25-5 W5M.
Interveners
Copithorne, R.A.
Rhodes, C.H.
Less detail

Decision 85-06

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1686
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
840739
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Experimental in situ scheme Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Experimental in situ scheme Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
840739
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cyclic steam injection
Elk Point area
In situ
Lindbergh area
Steam injection
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Air quality
Community relations
Cummings Fm
Emission
Environmental impact
Land value
Monitoring
Noise (sound)
NTS 73E
Pilot scale
Pollution
Safety
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
Decision D85-6 on application No. 840739 for approval to develop a 16 well cyclic steam experimental project in the Cummings zone of the Cold Lake Wabiskaw-McMurray oil sands deposit (section 10-56-6 W4M); resulted in approval No. 4448
Interveners
Yaremkevich, D.
Kadutski, D.
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Group of Elk Point-Lindbergh Area Residents
Town of Elk Point
County of Vermillion River
County of St.Paul
Less detail

Decision 85-07

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1685
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Application Number
840736
840986
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1985 (reduced well spacing and cleaning plant Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1985 (reduced well spacing and cleaning plant Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Application Number
840736
840986
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Spacing
Descriptors
Drilling spacing unit
In situ
Industrial plant
Lindbergh area
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Bitumen
Cleaning
Community relations
Contamination
Cummings Fm
Directional well
Environmental impact
Groundwater
Monitoring
Noise (sound)
NTS 73E
Oil pipeline
Solid hydrocarbon
Transportation
Truck
Water disposal
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.002
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.030
Notes
Decision D85-7 on application No. 840736 and No. 840986 to reduce well spacing for primary recovery from Cummings zone-Cold Lake-Wabiskaw-McMurray oil sands deposit and to construct and operate a cleaning plant to handle hydrocarbon production trucked from various PanCanadian wells (in section 3-56-6 W4M); Board hearing 84-12-11/12; resulted in Order No. Misc 8501
Interveners
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Shymkiw, J.
Shymkiw, Mrs.J.
Shymkiw, H.
Shymikiw, Mrs.H.
Kozicky, C.
Kozicky, Mrs.C.
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Group of Elk Point-Lindbergh Area Residents
Town of Elk Point
County of St. Paul
Less detail

Decision 85-15

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1680
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
840227
Title
Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1985 (commercial oil sands project (phase 1) Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1985 (commercial oil sands project (phase 1) Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
840227
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Carbon dioxide injection
Cyclic steam injection
Elk Point area
Elk Point project
In situ
Industrial plant
Lindbergh field
Steam flooding
Steam injection
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Air quality
Bitumen
Cleaning
Contamination
Disposal well
Emission
Environmental impact
ID-80-02
Hydrogen sulphide
Land reclamation
Land use
Locating
Monitoring
NTS 73E
Noise (sound)
Pollution
Recovery factor
Recycling
Socio-economic effect
Waste disposal
Water disposal
Water supply
Water well
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
Decision D85-15 (with addendum) on application No. 840227 for approval of phase 1 of a three phase commercial oil sands project (Elk Point project) in Lindbergh sector of Cold Lake oil sands deposits, consisting of 13-well cyclic steam and steam flood stimulation project on 2 Hectare well spacing and a 640 CU. M./day bitumen cleaning plant (TP.54-46, R.5-7 W4M); Board hearing 1985-01-08/09/12/15-18/21-23
Interveners
Kadutski, D.
Kadutski, C.
Kadutski, M.
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Keith, L.
Group of Elk Point -Lindbergh Area Residents
Town of Elk Point
County of St. Paul
Westmin Resources Limited
Less detail

Decision 85-20

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision828
Applicant
Koch Exploration Canada Ltd.
Application Number
841220
Title
Examiner report on application by Koch Exploration Canada Ltd., 1985 (experimental oil sands project Beaverdam sector)
Date
1985
Title
Examiner report on application by Koch Exploration Canada Ltd., 1985 (experimental oil sands project Beaverdam sector)
Date
1985
Applicant
Koch Exploration Canada Ltd.
Application Number
841220
Hearing Panel
Homeniuk TF
Lillo HO
Nichol JR
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cyclic steam injection
In situ
Steam injection
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Community relations
Disposal well
Emission
Environmental impact
Grand Rapids Fm
Injection well
Locating
Noise (sound)
NTS 73L
Pilot scale
Safety
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E85-20 on application No. 841220 to expand existing experimental cyclic steam project in the west half of section 19-61-4 W4M for recovery of bitumen from Cold Lake upper Grand Rapids oil sands deposit.
Interveners
Beaunoyer, L.
Beaunoyer, D.
Bonny Glen Farms, Limited
Campeau, L.
Suncor Inc.
Less detail

Decision 85-42

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision968
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
850428
850798
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Commercial oil sands project and water disposal scheme Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Commercial oil sands project and water disposal scheme Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
850428
850798
Hearing Panel
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Homeniuk TF
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cyclic steam injection
Dome Lindbergh project
In situ
Lindbergh area
Produced water
Steam injection
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Water disposal
Agricultural land
Air quality
Cummings Fm
Directional well
Disposal well
Emission
Environmental impact
Groundwater
Land reclamation
Locating
Monitoring
NTS 73E
Noise (sound)
Planning
Pollution
Recycling
Waste disposal
Water producing
Water supply
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
Decision D85-42 on application No. 850428 and 850798 by Dome on behalf of itself & its partners Sulpetro and CNG producing Company for a commercial oil sands deposit in TP.53-56, R.4-6, W4M and water disposal scheme, Lindbergh sector (being an expansion of current experimental project to commercial scale); Board hearing 1984-11-04/05/06
Interveners
Miller, L.
Kozicky, C.
Melnyk, A.
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Town of Elk Point
Westmin Resources Limited
Less detail

77 records – page 1 of 4.