248 records – page 1 of 13.

Decision 74-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2187
Applicant
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Application Number
7254
Title
Decision on application by Northwestern Utilities Limited, 1974 (application for permit to construct a gas pipe line from Homeglen-Rimbey area to Bonnie Glen area)
Date
1974
Title
Decision on application by Northwestern Utilities Limited, 1974 (application for permit to construct a gas pipe line from Homeglen-Rimbey area to Bonnie Glen area)
Date
1974
Applicant
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Application Number
7254
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Bonnie Glen field
Gas pipeline
Homeglen-Rimbey field
Pipeline construction permit
NTS 83B
NTS 83H
Legal References
Pipeline Act Part 2
Notes
Decision 74-1 on application No. 7254 to construct a gas line for the transmission of natural gas from Homeglen-Rimbey area to Bonnie Glen area; permit No. 15021
Interveners
The Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd.
TransCanada Pipelines Limited
The City of Edmonton
Less detail

Decision 74-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2179
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
7462
Title
Decision 74-03: Annual reserves and maximum rate limitations for oil pools
Date
1974
Title
Decision 74-03: Annual reserves and maximum rate limitations for oil pools
Date
1974
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
7462
Hearing Panel
Strom NA
Stafford GH
Webber HJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil supply
Descriptors
Alderson field
Alexis field
Boundary Lake field
Edson field
Judy Creek field
Medicine River field
MRL
Oil reserve
Pembina field
Pouce Coupe field
Rainbow field
Recovery factor
St. Albert-Big Lake field
Sturgeon Lake field
Utikuma Lake field
NTS 72L
NTS 83B
NTS 83F
NTS 83G
NTS 83H
NTS 83J
NTS 83M
NTS 83N
NTS 84B
NTS 84D
NTS 84L
Notes
Decision 74-3 on proceeding No. 7462 respecting crude oil reserves and maximum rate limitations in selected specified pools; Examiners' hearing 1974-01-28/29/30
Less detail

Decision 75-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2177
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
7728
7770
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1975 (240 KV transmission line from Ellerslie to Red Deer)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1975 (240 KV transmission line from Ellerslie to Red Deer)
Date
1975
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
7728
7770
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Strong JI
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Ellerslie area
Red Deer area
Transmission line
Electric power demand
ERCB 74-B
NTS 83A
NTS 83H
Right of way
Route selection
Sundance power plant
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S10
Notes
Decision 75-1 on application No. 7728 and No. 7770 to dismantle part of transmission line CP 12L between Ellerslie and Red Deer and to construct and operate new higher voltage transmission line along the existing right of way.
Interveners
Lachman, Mr. R.
Lachman, Mrs. R.
Stebner, A.
Morrisroe, J.T.
City of Red Deer
Red Deer Regional Planning Commission
Bilsborrow, M.J.
Brown, G.A.
Stretch, D.A.
Edmonton Regional Planning Commission
Bilsborrow, E.B.
Department of Highways and Transport
The City of Edmonton
Less detail

Decision 75-07

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2172
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
7869
7823
7913
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1975 (transmission and substation facilities stony plain - Devon project)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1975 (transmission and substation facilities stony plain - Devon project)
Date
1975
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
7869
7823
7913
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Strong JI
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Electric substation
Stony Plain area
Transmission line
Environmental impact
Locating
NTS 83H
Route selection
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S13
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
Notes
Decision 75-7 on application No. 7869, No. 7823 and to upgrade existing transmission and substation facilities in the area between Stony Plain and Devon, west of Edmonton.
Interveners
Goertz, R.
Halton-Grove REalty
Gray, D.S.K.
Estate of Elizabeth Bauer
Baron, H.
Weitzel, W.
Edmonton Regional Planning Council
Sigma Lands
Owners-Section 14-51-26-W4
Kapty, A.
Berretti, M
County of Parkland No. 31
McLean, W.
McLean, M.
QCTV
Devon Nurseries
Less detail

Decision 75-10

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2169
Applicant
City of Edmonton
Edmonton Power
Application Number
8149
Title
Decision on application by City of Edmonton, 1975 (Lambton substation and 240 KV transmission line)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by City of Edmonton, 1975 (Lambton substation and 240 KV transmission line)
Date
1975
Applicant
City of Edmonton
Edmonton Power
Application Number
8149
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Electric substation
Transmission line
Electric power demand
Environmental impact
Locating
NTS 83H
Route selection
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S10
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Notes
Decision 75-10 on application No. 8149 to construct and operate a double-circuit 240-KV transmission line and substation to supply the southeast Edmonton area.
Interveners
Beckwith Farms (1966) Ltd.
Capital Management Ltd.
Ross, D.K.
Ross, Mrs. D.K.
Calgary Power
Less detail

Decision 75-N

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2353
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Dupont of Canada Limited
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Canadian Industries Limited
Application Number
8491
8514
8549
8554
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., Dupont of Canada Limited, Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited and Canadian Industries Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., Dupont of Canada Limited, Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited and Canadian Industries Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1975
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Dupont of Canada Limited
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Canadian Industries Limited
Application Number
8491
8514
8549
8554
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Chloroethylene
Dichloroethane
Ethylene
Fort Saskatchewan area
Industrial development permit
Joffre area
Polymer
Red Deer area
Redwater area
Alberta
Chlorine - raw material
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Ethane - raw material
Ethylene - raw material
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 83A
NTS 83H
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 75-N on application No. 8491 (A.G.E.) to use ethane and gas as fuel and raw material to produce ethylene near Red Deer (A.G.E. unit 1) (permit No. age 76-1) and on application No. 8514 (Dupont) to use gas as fuel in production of high density polyethylene near Red Deer (application withdrawn) and on application No. 8549 (Dow) to use gas as fuel in vinyl chloride monomer plant near Fort Saskatchewan (permit no.DCC 76-1) and on application No. 8554 (CIL) to use gas as fuel in a low density polyethylene plant near Redwater (application withdrawn); Board hearing (age & Dupont); 1975-06-18/19/20 Board hearing (Dow & CIL) 1975-07-09.
Less detail

Decision 76-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2148
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
8932
Title
Decision 76-03: Annual reserves and maximum rate limitations for oil pools
Date
1976
Title
Decision 76-03: Annual reserves and maximum rate limitations for oil pools
Date
1976
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
8932
Hearing Panel
Bray JA
Wolff WH
Stafford GH
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Oil supply
Descriptors
Golden Spike field
Joarcam field
Joffre field
MRL
Oil reserve
Wildmere field
Blairmore Fm
Lloydminster Fm
NTS 73E
NTS 83A
NTS 83H
Reservoir characteristic
Viking Fm
Notes
Decision 76-3 on proceeding No. 8932 to revise the crude oil reserves and maximum rate limitations for various pools.
Interveners
Great Northern Oil, Ltd.
Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
Imperial Oil Limited
Norcen Energy Resources Limited
Less detail

Decision 76-06

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2158
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
8770
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1976 (transmission line CP 739l from Acheson to Devon).
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1976 (transmission line CP 739l from Acheson to Devon).
Date
1976
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
8770
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Stony Plain area
Transmission line
NTS 83H
Route selection
Notes
Decision 76-6 on application No. 8770 to amend permit and licence No. CP 75-13 regarding the section of 138 KV transmission line CP 739L between Acheson and Devon.
Interveners
Berretti, M
Oberle, K.
Evans, D.
Weir, N.
Mathewson, C.
Whitehead, J.
Bittorf, D.G.
Ondrack, J.
Allen, P.
Dixon, M.M
Dixon, Mrs.
Thompson, Mr.
Thompson, Mrs.
Melton, A.
Kapty, A.
Wright, D.
Latimer, E.
Borchert, L
Less detail

Decision 76-11

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2153
Applicant
Alberta Oil Sands Pipeline Ltd.
Application Number
9138
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Oil Sands Pipeline Ltd., 1976 (oil line from Fort McMurray to Edmonton)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Oil Sands Pipeline Ltd., 1976 (oil line from Fort McMurray to Edmonton)
Date
1976
Applicant
Alberta Oil Sands Pipeline Ltd.
Application Number
9138
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Berkowitz N
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Fort McMurray area
Manufactured crude oil
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Mildred Lake project
NTS 74D
NTS 83H
NTS 83I
NTS 83P
Pipeline route
Route selection
Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Transportation corridor
Legal References
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
Decision 76-11 on application No. 9138 to construct an oil line to transport synthetic crude from Syncrude's Mildred Lake plant to the interprovincial pipeline terminal in Edmonton.
Interveners
Albersun Pipeline Ltd.
CU Engineering Limited
Less detail

Decision 76-13

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2151
Applicant
Edmonton Power
Application Number
9188
Title
Decision on application by Edmonton Power, 1976 (transmission line of 240 KV and Jasper Substation)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Edmonton Power, 1976 (transmission line of 240 KV and Jasper Substation)
Date
1976
Applicant
Edmonton Power
Application Number
9188
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Electric substation
Transmission line
Electric power demand
Environmental impact
NTS 83H
Route selection
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S10
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Notes
Decision 76-13 on application No. 9188 to construct and operate a 240/72-KV substation and a 240 KV double circuit transmission line to serve the west Edmonton area.
Interveners
Calgary Power Ltd.
Famous Players Limited
Triple Five Corporation and Northern Trading Co. Ltd.
A Group of Eight Parties
Triple Five Corporation and a Group of Thirteen Parties
Less detail

Decision 76-B

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2386
Applicant
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Application Number
9118
Title
Decision on application by Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited, 1976 (For industrial development permit under section 42 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited, 1976 (For industrial development permit under section 42 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act)
Date
1976
Applicant
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Application Number
9118
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Ethylene glycol
Ethylene oxide
Fort Saskatchewan area
Industrial development permit
Alberta
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 83H
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 76-B on application No. 9118 for an IDP to use gas as fuel to produce ethylene glycol and ethylene oxide in plant to be constructed at Fort Saskatchewan (permit DCC 76-2).
Less detail

Decision 76-G

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2381
Applicant
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Application Number
9222
Title
Decision on application by Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited, 1976 (power plant at Fort Saskatchewan)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited, 1976 (power plant at Fort Saskatchewan)
Date
1976
Applicant
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Application Number
9222
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Electric power
Descriptors
Electric power project
Fort Saskatchewan area
Chemical plant
Electric power demand
Electric power supply
Environmental impact
Industrial plant
NTS 83H
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S7
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Notes
ERCB Report 76-G on application 9222 to construct and operate a 140 mw power plant at its Fort Saskatchewan chemical processing complex (in TP.55, R.22, W4M) and to connect the power plant to Calgary Power's transmission system; See also Report 76-I for decision on use of gas as fuel to increase production of chlorine and sodium hydroxide
Less detail

Decision 76-I

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2379
Applicant
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Application Number
9493
Title
Decision on application by Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited, 1976 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited, 1976 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1976
Applicant
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Application Number
9493
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
No Hearing
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Chlorine
Fort Saskatchewan area
Industrial development permit
Sodium hydroxide
Economic analysis
Fuel consumption
Gas consumption
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 83H
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 76-I on application No. 9493 for an industrial development permit authorizing the use of natural gas as fuel in the production of chlorine and caustic soda in an existing plant in the Dow complex at Fort Saskatchewan that would be expanded to increase capacity; no hearing; see also report 76-G for Decision on power plant for the complex.
Less detail

Decision 77-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2143
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
9608
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (permit to construct a pipeline from red deer to Fort Saskatchewan, part 1)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (permit to construct a pipeline from red deer to Fort Saskatchewan, part 1)
Date
1977
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
9608
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Butane
Ethane
Fort Saskatchewan area
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Pentanes plus
Propane
Red Deer area
NTS 83A
NTS 83H
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 77-5 on application No. 9608 to construct an oil line to transport ethane, propane, butanes and pentanes plus from the age plant under construction near Joffre and from Dome's Edmonton liquid gas plant to storage and eventual delivery to the Cochin pipeline at Fort Saskatchewan; Board hearing 1977-02-09 reconvened 1977-03-08; see also Decision 77-06
Interveners
The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Aristocrat Holdings Ltd.
The Battle River Regional Planning Commission
Dow Chemical of Canda Limited
Hampson, C.G.
Harmin Farms
Mayer, H.
Paley, M.
Heppner, E.
Heppner, L.W.
Heppner, M.M.
Heppner, E.A.
Heppner, M.M.R.
Chimer, W.
Cathton Holdings Ltd.
Fenske, W.A.
Lengert, H.
Lentz, C.
Madison Development Corporation Ltd.
Opaninski, B
Opalinski, T.
Yaskowich, J
Ziobro, S.
Shell Canada Resources Limited
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Kataleen, A.Y.
Less detail

Decision 77-06

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2142
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
9608
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (permit to construct a pipeline from Red Deer To Fort Saskatchewan, part 2)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (permit to construct a pipeline from Red Deer To Fort Saskatchewan, part 2)
Date
1977
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
9608
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Butane
Ethane
Fort Saskatchewan area
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Pentanes plus
Propane
NTS 83H
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 77-6 on application No. 9608 to construct a pipeline to transport ethane, propane, butanes and pentanes PLU Board hearing 1977-02-09 reconvened 1977-03-08 see also Decision 77-5 for part 1
Interveners
The Alberta Gas Ethelene Company Ltd.
Aristocrat Holdings Ltd.
The Battle River Regional Planning Commission
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Hampson, C.G.
Harmin Farms
Mayer, H.
Paley, M.
Heppner, E.
Heppner, L.W.
Heppner, M.M.
Heppner, E.A.
Heppner, M.R.
Chimera, W.
Cathton Holdings Ltd.
Fenske, W.A.
Lengert, H.
Lentz, C.
Madison Development Corporation Ltd.
Opalinski, B.
Opalinski, J.
Yaskowich, J.
Ziobro, S.
Shell Canada Resources Limited
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Kataleen, A.Y.
Less detail

Decision 77-11

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2137
Applicant
Edmonton Power
Application Number
9806
Title
Decision on application by Edmonton Power, 1977 (240 KV transmission line facilities of Edmonton Power in the City of Edmonton)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Edmonton Power, 1977 (240 KV transmission line facilities of Edmonton Power in the City of Edmonton)
Date
1977
Applicant
Edmonton Power
Application Number
9806
Hearing Panel
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Transmission line
Electric power demand
NTS 83H
Power system interconnection
Route selection
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Notes
Decision 77-11 and interim Decision on application No. 9806 to construct and operate a 240 KV transmission line and a terminal station in the Edmonton area and to interconnect to existing Calgary power facilities.
Interveners
Bank of Montreal
Christenson Contractors Ltd.
Promotion Signs Ltd.
Smith Bros. Equipment Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 77-15

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2133
Applicant
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Application Number
770542
Title
Decision on application by Northwestern Utilities Limited, 1977 (permit to construct a pipeline in the Edmonton area)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Northwestern Utilities Limited, 1977 (permit to construct a pipeline in the Edmonton area)
Date
1977
Applicant
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Application Number
770542
Hearing Panel
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
NTS 83H
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 77-15 on application No. 770542 to construct a 24-inch gas line to transport natural gas from a point in LSD 1-36-50-26 W4 near Devon to the Edmonton liquid gas plant in LSD 3-4-52-24 W4 in the south Edmonton area.
Interveners
Bailey, D.R.
Less detail

Decision 77-19

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2129
Applicant
Blake Mineral Resources Ltd.
Application Number
770170
Title
Decision on application by Blake Mineral Resources Ltd., 1977 (common purchaser - rateable take of gas Fairydell-Bon Accord middle Viking B pool)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Blake Mineral Resources Ltd., 1977 (common purchaser - rateable take of gas Fairydell-Bon Accord middle Viking B pool)
Date
1977
Applicant
Blake Mineral Resources Ltd.
Application Number
770170
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Manyluk AF
Fuller KW
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Common purchaser
Rateable take
Descriptors
Common purchaser
Fairydell Bon Accord field
Rateable take of gas
Equity
Gas producing
Gas reserve
Lease drainage
NTS 83H
Viking Fm
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S35
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S52
Notes
Decision 77-19 on application No. 770170 to declare Northwestern Utilities a common purchaser of the gas produced from the Fairydell-Bon Accord Middle Viking B pool and for an Order to distribute the gas produced from this pool equally among the capable wells in the pool.
Interveners
Atco Gas and Oil Ltd.
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Less detail

Decision 77-25

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2123
Applicant
Eagle Explorations Ltd.
Application Number
770308
Title
Decision on application by Eagle Explorations Ltd., 10977 (order declaring that TransCanada Pipelines Limited be declared a common purchaser of gas produced from the Bruce Viking A pool in the vicinity of township 48, range 16, W4M)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Eagle Explorations Ltd., 10977 (order declaring that TransCanada Pipelines Limited be declared a common purchaser of gas produced from the Bruce Viking A pool in the vicinity of township 48, range 16, W4M)
Date
1977
Applicant
Eagle Explorations Ltd.
Application Number
770308
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Manyluk AF
Fuller KW
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Common purchaser
Descriptors
Bruce field
Common purchaser
Gas producing
Lease drainage
Marketing
NTS 83H
Viking Fm
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S52
Notes
Decision 77-25 on application No. 770308 to declare TCPL a common purchaser of gas produced from the Bruce Viking A pool in the vicinity of TP.48, R.16, W4M.
Interveners
Voyager Petroleums Ltd.
TransCanada PipeLines Limited
Less detail

Decision 77-C

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2373
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited
Mitsubishi Corporation
Petalta Project (Petrochemicals Alberta Project)
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
Application Number
9070
8911
Title
Decision on application by Petalta Project (Alberta Energy Company Ltd, Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited, and Mitsubishi Corporation), 1977 (benzene plant) and Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line, Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited and Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1977 (benzene plant)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Petalta Project (Alberta Energy Company Ltd, Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited, and Mitsubishi Corporation), 1977 (benzene plant) and Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line, Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited and Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1977 (benzene plant)
Date
1977
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited
Mitsubishi Corporation
Petalta Project (Petrochemicals Alberta Project)
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
Application Number
9070
8911
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Berkowitz N
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Benzene
Bruderheim area
Chemical plant
Fort Saskatchewan area
Industrial development permit
Petalta Project (Petrochemicals Alberta Project)
Benefit cost analysis
Economic analysis
NTS 83H
Pentanes plus - fuel
Pentanes plus - raw material
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 77-C on application No. 9070 by AEC et al (Petalta) for a plant to be located near Fort Saskatchewan to convert pentanes plus to benzene and liquid byproducts and on application No. 8911 by AGTL et al for a plant to be constructed near Bruderheim to convert pentanes plus to benzene and liquid byproduct (including gasoline or diesel fuel); Board hearing (Petalta project APP # 9070) 1976-06-15/16 and 1976-07-05; Board hearing (AGTL Bruderheim APP # 8911) 1977-07-06/07/08/09
Less detail

248 records – page 1 of 13.