177 records – page 1 of 9.

Decision 75-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2177
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
7728
7770
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1975 (240 KV transmission line from Ellerslie to Red Deer)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1975 (240 KV transmission line from Ellerslie to Red Deer)
Date
1975
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
7728
7770
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Strong JI
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Ellerslie area
Red Deer area
Transmission line
Electric power demand
ERCB 74-B
NTS 83A
NTS 83H
Right of way
Route selection
Sundance power plant
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S10
Notes
Decision 75-1 on application No. 7728 and No. 7770 to dismantle part of transmission line CP 12L between Ellerslie and Red Deer and to construct and operate new higher voltage transmission line along the existing right of way.
Interveners
Lachman, Mr. R.
Lachman, Mrs. R.
Stebner, A.
Morrisroe, J.T.
City of Red Deer
Red Deer Regional Planning Commission
Bilsborrow, M.J.
Brown, G.A.
Stretch, D.A.
Edmonton Regional Planning Commission
Bilsborrow, E.B.
Department of Highways and Transport
The City of Edmonton
Less detail

Decision 75-E

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2363
Applicant
Alberta Power Limited
Application Number
7556
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Power Ltd., 1975 (construction and operation of an addition to the Battle River power plant)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Power Ltd., 1975 (construction and operation of an addition to the Battle River power plant)
Date
1975
Applicant
Alberta Power Limited
Application Number
7556
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Strong JI
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Electric power
Descriptors
Battle River power plant
Electric power generation
Electric power plant
Power system interconnection
Thermal power plant
Alberta
Coal - fuel
Electric power demand
Environmental impact
NTS 83A
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S7
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Notes
ERCB report 75-E on application No. 7556 for an addition (unit 5) to the Battle River power plant; Board hearing (Govier/Strong/Desorcy) held 1974-05-01/02; Order no HE 7501
Less detail

Decision 75-N

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2353
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Dupont of Canada Limited
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Canadian Industries Limited
Application Number
8491
8514
8549
8554
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., Dupont of Canada Limited, Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited and Canadian Industries Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., Dupont of Canada Limited, Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited and Canadian Industries Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1975
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Dupont of Canada Limited
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Canadian Industries Limited
Application Number
8491
8514
8549
8554
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Chloroethylene
Dichloroethane
Ethylene
Fort Saskatchewan area
Industrial development permit
Joffre area
Polymer
Red Deer area
Redwater area
Alberta
Chlorine - raw material
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Ethane - raw material
Ethylene - raw material
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 83A
NTS 83H
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 75-N on application No. 8491 (A.G.E.) to use ethane and gas as fuel and raw material to produce ethylene near Red Deer (A.G.E. unit 1) (permit No. age 76-1) and on application No. 8514 (Dupont) to use gas as fuel in production of high density polyethylene near Red Deer (application withdrawn) and on application No. 8549 (Dow) to use gas as fuel in vinyl chloride monomer plant near Fort Saskatchewan (permit no.DCC 76-1) and on application No. 8554 (CIL) to use gas as fuel in a low density polyethylene plant near Redwater (application withdrawn); Board hearing (age & Dupont); 1975-06-18/19/20 Board hearing (Dow & CIL) 1975-07-09.
Less detail

Decision 76-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2161
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Application Number
8908
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited, 1976 (gas line - Ferintosh area)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited, 1976 (gas line - Ferintosh area)
Date
1976
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Application Number
8908
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Berkowitz N
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Ferintosh field
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
NTS 83A
Notes
Decision 76-1 on application No. 8908 to construct a pipeline to transport gas from its Ferintosh meter station to the Wood River meter station.
Interveners
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
Less detail

Decision 76-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2148
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
8932
Title
Decision 76-03: Annual reserves and maximum rate limitations for oil pools
Date
1976
Title
Decision 76-03: Annual reserves and maximum rate limitations for oil pools
Date
1976
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
8932
Hearing Panel
Bray JA
Wolff WH
Stafford GH
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Oil supply
Descriptors
Golden Spike field
Joarcam field
Joffre field
MRL
Oil reserve
Wildmere field
Blairmore Fm
Lloydminster Fm
NTS 73E
NTS 83A
NTS 83H
Reservoir characteristic
Viking Fm
Notes
Decision 76-3 on proceeding No. 8932 to revise the crude oil reserves and maximum rate limitations for various pools.
Interveners
Great Northern Oil, Ltd.
Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
Imperial Oil Limited
Norcen Energy Resources Limited
Less detail

Decision 77-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2143
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
9608
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (permit to construct a pipeline from red deer to Fort Saskatchewan, part 1)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (permit to construct a pipeline from red deer to Fort Saskatchewan, part 1)
Date
1977
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
9608
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Butane
Ethane
Fort Saskatchewan area
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Pentanes plus
Propane
Red Deer area
NTS 83A
NTS 83H
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 77-5 on application No. 9608 to construct an oil line to transport ethane, propane, butanes and pentanes plus from the age plant under construction near Joffre and from Dome's Edmonton liquid gas plant to storage and eventual delivery to the Cochin pipeline at Fort Saskatchewan; Board hearing 1977-02-09 reconvened 1977-03-08; see also Decision 77-06
Interveners
The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Aristocrat Holdings Ltd.
The Battle River Regional Planning Commission
Dow Chemical of Canda Limited
Hampson, C.G.
Harmin Farms
Mayer, H.
Paley, M.
Heppner, E.
Heppner, L.W.
Heppner, M.M.
Heppner, E.A.
Heppner, M.M.R.
Chimer, W.
Cathton Holdings Ltd.
Fenske, W.A.
Lengert, H.
Lentz, C.
Madison Development Corporation Ltd.
Opaninski, B
Opalinski, T.
Yaskowich, J
Ziobro, S.
Shell Canada Resources Limited
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Kataleen, A.Y.
Less detail

Decision 77-10

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2138
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
770084
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (construct a pipeline from Cochrane to Red Deer)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (construct a pipeline from Cochrane to Red Deer)
Date
1977
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
770084
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Butane
Ethane
Cochrane area
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Pentanes plus
Propane
Red Deer area
Chemical plant
Environmental impact
NTS 82P
NTS 83A
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Safety
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 77-10 on application No. 770084 to construct an oil line to transport ethane, propane, butane and pentanes plus from a point in the NE quarter of section 16, TP.26, R.4 (W5M) near Cochrane to a point in the NW quarter of section 8, TP.38, R.25 (W4M) near Red Deer as part of the Alberta ethane gathering system to provide a continous supply of ethane to the age plant at Joffre.
Interveners
Alberta Natural Gas Company Ltd.
Beddoes, J.L.
Less detail

Decision 77-21

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2127
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
770118
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1977 (240 KV transmission line facilities in the Red Deer Calgary area)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1977 (240 KV transmission line facilities in the Red Deer Calgary area)
Date
1977
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
770118
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Calgary area
Red Deer area
Transmission line
Agricultural land
Capacity
Electric power demand
Electric power supply
Health
NTS 82P
NTS 83A
Right of way
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S13
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Notes
Decision 77-21 on application No. 770118 to construct and operate a 240 KV transmission line from the Red Deer substation (CP 63S) to a location 23.4 km north of the Janet substation (CP 74S).
Interveners
A Group of 35 Parties
Sackett, K.
Radau, F.
Latimer, M.E.
Bagrie, D.W.
Osterman, Mrs.
Less detail

Decision 78-04

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2116
Applicant
Gulf Oil Canada Limited
Application Number
770991
Title
Decision on inquiry into uncontrolled discharge of sour gas Gulf Oil Canada Limited secondary line licence 7293 in the Alix area, 1978
Date
1978
Title
Decision on inquiry into uncontrolled discharge of sour gas Gulf Oil Canada Limited secondary line licence 7293 in the Alix area, 1978
Date
1978
Applicant
Gulf Oil Canada Limited
Application Number
770991
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Inquiry - Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Pipeline accident
Pipeline leak
Sour gas
Atmospheric diffusion
Death
Emergency procedure
Evacuation
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 83A
Pipeline safety
Safety
Inquiry
Notes
Decision on proceeding No. 770991 on pipeline rupture in LSD 1-23-39-23 W4M on pipeline that transmits sour gas from Clive central battery to Gulf Nevis gas plant resulting in an uncontrolled discharge of sour gas at the break location; Public inquiry
Interveners
Quintana Exploration Co.
Hazen and Babb Drilling Consultants Ltd.
Love's Oilfield Construction
Schmidt Drilling
Less detail

Decision 78-07

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2113
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Application Number
770666
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., 1978 (construct a pipeline from Joffre to Fort Saskatchewan)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., 1978 (construct a pipeline from Joffre to Fort Saskatchewan)
Date
1978
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Application Number
770666
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Bohme VE
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Ethylene
Fort Saskatchewan area
Pipeline construction permit
Product pipeline
Red Deer area
Agricultural land
Buried
NTS 83A
NTS 83H
Pipeline construction
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Route selection
Legal References
Pipeline Act S7
Notes
Decision on application to construct a pipeline to transport ethylene from LSD 5-32-38-25 W4M to LSD 15-11-55-22 W4M and a meter station in LSD 15-11-55-22 W4M; Pipeline permit 14763 se related decision D79-2 for portion of the line in TP.52-53, R.22-23, W4M which was deferred in original decision
Interveners
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Group of Farmers Headed by W.A. Lovell
Holubisky, P.
Holubisky, S.
Canadian Industries Limited
Genstar Development Company Limited
Windsor, G.
Arnold Brothers Transport Ltd.
Qualico Developments
Less detail

Decision 78-09

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2111
Applicant
Spur Engineering Ltd.
Gordon Land Services Ltd.
Application Number
770793
Title
Decision on application by Spur Engineering Ltd. and Roger M. Gordon Land Services Ltd. ltd., 1978 (common purchaser, common carrier, common processor and rateable take for gas produced from the Lacombe Viking A pool)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Spur Engineering Ltd. and Roger M. Gordon Land Services Ltd. ltd., 1978 (common purchaser, common carrier, common processor and rateable take for gas produced from the Lacombe Viking A pool)
Date
1978
Applicant
Spur Engineering Ltd.
Gordon Land Services Ltd.
Application Number
770793
Hearing Panel
Pearson DG
Pow JR
Warne GA
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Common purchaser
Descriptors
Common carrier
Common purchaser
Common processor
Lacombe field
Rateable take of gas
Allowable production
Equity
Capacity
Gas pipeline
Gas producing
Lease drainage
Marketing
NTS 83A
Viking Fm
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S35
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S49
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S52
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S54
Notes
Decision 78-9 on application No. 770793 for an Order declaring NUL a common purchaser of gas from the Lacombe Viking A pool, for orders declaring Sulpetro a common carrier and common processor of gas produced from the pool and for an Order distributing gas production from the pool equitably among wells (TP.40, R.26, W4M); rateable take application under section 35 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act was dismissed
Interveners
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Sulpetro of Canada Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 78-AA

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2334
Applicant
Forestburg Collieries Limited
Alberta. Dept. of the Environment
Application Number
9903
Title
Decision on application by Forestburg Collieries Limited, 1978 (permit to develop and a licence to commence mining operations at a mine site near Halkirk)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Forestburg Collieries Limited, 1978 (permit to develop and a licence to commence mining operations at a mine site near Halkirk)
Date
1978
Applicant
Forestburg Collieries Limited
Alberta. Dept. of the Environment
Application Number
9903
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Coal
Descriptors
Coal mine
Coal project
Forestburg South mine project
Surface mining
Benefit cost analysis
Bituminous coal
Coal reserve
Environmental impact
Land reclamation
Mine design
Mine safety
NTS 83A
Overburden ratio
Reclamation
Socio-economic effect
Soil conservation
Water quality
Legal References
Coal Conservation Act S10
Coal Conservation Act S11
Notes
ERCB report 78-AA on application No. 9903 to develop and operate coal mine of the south SIDE of the Battle River (TP.39-40, R.15-16, W4M) to replace coal production from the DIPLOMAT mine site No. 1578 to ensure an ADEQUATE supply for APL'S generating station; Board hearing 1978-01-24/25 permit No. C 78-12 licence No. C 78-13
Less detail

Decision 79-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2095
Applicant
Fekete and Associates
Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Company
Application Number
780374
Title
Decision on application by Fekete and Associates on behalf of Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Company, 1979 (compulsory pooling - an order pooling tracts for the production of gas from the Erskine Glauconitic C Pool)
Date
1979
Title
Decision on application by Fekete and Associates on behalf of Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Company, 1979 (compulsory pooling - an order pooling tracts for the production of gas from the Erskine Glauconitic C Pool)
Date
1979
Applicant
Fekete and Associates
Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Company
Application Number
780374
Hearing Panel
Pow JR
Edgecombe RW
Yu JNG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Compulsory pooling
Descriptors
Compulsory pooling
Erskine field
Drilling cost
Geologic interpretation
Glauconitic sandstone
NTS 83A
Operating cost
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S82
Notes
Decision 79-1 with Examiners report appended on application No. 780374 for an Order that all tracts within section 8-39-20 W4M be operated as a unit for the production of gas from the Glauconitic Sandstone.
Interveners
Gulf Canada Limited
Madison Oils Limited
Less detail

Decision 79-07

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2089
Applicant
Spur Engineering Ltd.
Gordon Land Services Ltd.
Application Number
780464
Title
Decision on application by Spur Engineering Ltd. for Roger M. Gordon Land Services Ltd., 1979 (direction concerning the proportions of gas to be purchased Lacombe Viking A pool)
Date
1979
Title
Decision on application by Spur Engineering Ltd. for Roger M. Gordon Land Services Ltd., 1979 (direction concerning the proportions of gas to be purchased Lacombe Viking A pool)
Date
1979
Applicant
Spur Engineering Ltd.
Gordon Land Services Ltd.
Application Number
780464
Hearing Panel
Pow JR
Pearson DG
Warne GA
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Common purchaser
Descriptors
Common purchaser
Lacombe field
Gas producing
Measuring
NTS 83A
Viking Fm
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S35
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S52
Notes
Decision and addendum (with examiners report appended) on application to direct the proportion of gas Northwestern Utilities must purchase from each producer or owner offering gas from the Lacombe Viking A pool (TP.40, R.26, W4M)
Interveners
Sulpetro Limited
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Less detail

Decision 79-13

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2083
Applicant
Gulf Canada Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
770551
780221
780222
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Limited and Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1979 (permits to construct three pipelines - Malmo, Bashaw and Nevis areas)
Date
1979
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Limited and Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1979 (permits to construct three pipelines - Malmo, Bashaw and Nevis areas)
Date
1979
Applicant
Gulf Canada Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
770551
780221
780222
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Bashaw field
Gas pipeline
Malmo field
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Automatic control
Environmental impact
ID-79-02
Gas conservation
NTS 83A
Petroleum conservation
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Remote control
Safety
Notes
Decision 79-13 on application No. 770551 to construct a pipeline to transport sour gas from the Malmo-Bashaw area to an existing gas plant (from LSD 5-14-44-22 W4M to LSD 9-33-38-22 W4M) and on application No. 780222 for pipeline to transport sour gas from wells to secondary gas line proposed in application 770551 (TP.43, R.22, W4M) and on application 780221 for a pipeline to transport sour crude oil from a point in LSD 10-6-42-22 W4M to a point in LSD 7-10-44-22 W4M (connection Bashaw battery to an existing oil pipeline).
Interveners
Neis, G.W.
Moore, J.H.
Less detail

Decision 80-30

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2009
Applicant
Alberta Products Pipe Line Limited
Application Number
800440
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Products Pipe Line Ltd., 1980 (permit to construct a pipeline from Edmonton to Calgary)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Products Pipe Line Ltd., 1980 (permit to construct a pipeline from Edmonton to Calgary)
Date
1980
Applicant
Alberta Products Pipe Line Limited
Application Number
800440
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Calgary area
Edmonton area
Petroleum product
Pipeline construction permit
Pipeline project
Product pipeline
Red Deer area
Capacity
Demand (economics)
Environmental impact
NTS 82P
NTS 83A
NTS 83H
Pipeline crossing
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Right of way
Route selection
Supply (economics)
Transmission corridor
Transportation corridor
Notes
Decision 80-30 on application No. 800440 to construct a pipeline to transport gasolines, diesel fuel, aviation fuels, solvents, and heating oil from a pump station in Edmonton to existing facilities in Calgary (TP.23-53, 23-29, W4M); Board hearing 1980-09-23/26; see related Decisions 81-31 and 81-34 for Decisions on specific segments of route that were matters of concern
Interveners
County of Lacombe No. 14
Daines Farms Ltd.
Paul S. Seiferling
Battle River Regional Planning Commission
City of Edmonton
Turbo Resources Ltd.
Crows Nest Resources Ltd.
Daon Corporation
Less detail

Decision 81-06

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1761
Applicant
Kandex Resources and Development Ltd.
Application Number
800850
Title
Examiners report on application by Kandex Resources and Development Ltd., 1981 (normal quarter section drilling spacing units Nisku formation, Wood River field)
Date
1981
Title
Examiners report on application by Kandex Resources and Development Ltd., 1981 (normal quarter section drilling spacing units Nisku formation, Wood River field)
Date
1981
Applicant
Kandex Resources and Development Ltd.
Application Number
800850
Hearing Panel
Pow JR
Wolff WH
Purvis RA
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Spacing
Descriptors
Drilling spacing unit
Wood River field
Nisku Fm
NTS 83A
Oil producing
Petroleum conservation
Revision
Target area
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.020
Notes
ERCB Examiners report No. E81-6 on application No. 800850 to establish one quarter section drilling spacing units for the production of oil from the Nisku FM in the west half of section 4-43-23 W4M.
Less detail

Decision 81-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1759
Applicant
Rampart Resources Ltd.
Scion Petroleum Engineering Limited
Application Number
800784
Title
Examiners report on application by Rampart Resources Ltd., 1981 (sweet gas plant Joffre field)
Date
1981
Title
Examiners report on application by Rampart Resources Ltd., 1981 (sweet gas plant Joffre field)
Date
1981
Applicant
Rampart Resources Ltd.
Scion Petroleum Engineering Limited
Application Number
800784
Hearing Panel
Evans RG
Mazurek LA
Yu JNG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Joffre field
Design criteria
Environmental impact
Flare
Gas conservation
Land value
Liquefied natural gas
Noise (sound)
NTS 83A
Petroleum conservation
Pollution
Storage facility
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
ERCB Examiners report No. E81-8 on application No. 800784 by SCION on behalf of RAMPART to construct and operate a gas processing plant to process sweet gas in LSD 10-18-38-26 W4M.
Interveners
Allen, S.J.
Less detail

Decision 81-09

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1758
Applicant
Panther Resources Ltd.
Application Number
800651
Title
Examiners report on application by Panther Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas processing plant)
Date
1981
Title
Examiners report on application by Panther Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas processing plant)
Date
1981
Applicant
Panther Resources Ltd.
Application Number
800651
Hearing Panel
Evans RG
Pearson DG
Remmer WG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Duhamel field
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Acidification
Air quality
Economic analysis
Emission
Environmental impact
Flare
Hydrogen sulphide removal
Livestock
Locating
Monitoring
NTS 83A
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
ERCB Examiners report No. E81-9 on application No. 800651 to construct and operate a sour gas processing plant southwest of Camrose in LSD 5-31-45-20 W4M; Examiners' hearing 81-01-15 adjourned to 81-03-17/18/19
Interveners
City of Camrose
County of Camrose No.22
Cordes, K.
Calvin, G.
Noden, D.
Luz, W.
Klapstein, W.
Sauer, J.
Sauer, K.
Weyhausen, H.
Weyga Farming Ltd.
Watterodt, T.
Watterodt, W.
Watterodt, M.
Schroeder, D.
Schroeder, K.
Schroeder, P.
Schroeder, H.
Graefin Von Helldorf, V.
Schroeser, I.
Baumgarten, E.
Braim, B.
Krangnes, D.
Snider, R.
Tate, R.
Less detail

Decision 81-10

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1998
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Application Number
800853
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene)
Date
1981
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Application Number
800853
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Webber HJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Ethylene
Industrial development permit
Red Deer area
Air quality
Benefit cost analysis
Design criteria
Emission
Environmental impact
Ethane
Ethane - raw material
Forecasting
Land use
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
Noise (sound)
NTS 83A
Pollution
Raw material
Socio-economic effect
Supply (economics)
Water
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 81-10 on application No. 800853 to use ethane as feedstock and natural gas as fuel to manufacture ethylene in plant to be constructed (unit 3) adjacent to present facilities (units 1&2) near Joffre (TP.38, R.25, W4M); Board hearing 1981-04-07/08
Interveners
Preserve Agricultural Land
Red Deer Regional Planning Commission
Hainsworth, B.W.
Chessor, D.
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Esso Chemical Canada
Du Pont Canada Inc.
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
NOVA, AN ALBERTA CORPORATION
Shell Canada Limited
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Esso Resources Canada Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Sulpetro Limited
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Less detail

177 records – page 1 of 9.