117 records – page 1 of 6.

Decision 77-04

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2144
Applicant
IPEX Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
9980
Title
Decision on application by IPEX Oil and Gas Ltd., 1977 (licence to drill a well in LS 14-36-26-1 W5M Crossfield and Airdrie areas)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by IPEX Oil and Gas Ltd., 1977 (licence to drill a well in LS 14-36-26-1 W5M Crossfield and Airdrie areas)
Date
1977
Applicant
IPEX Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
9980
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Airdrie area
Sour gas
Well licence
Emergency procedure
Gas producing
Gas well
Hydrogen sulphide
Isopach map
Land use
Locating
NTS 82O
Safety
Turner Valley Fm
Urban development
Notes
Decision 77-4 on application No. 9980 to drill the well, Ipex Czar et al Cross 14-36-26-1 (W5M), to produce gas from Elkton member of the Turner Valley formation; Board hearing 1977-02-23/24
Interveners
Town of Airdrie
Nu-West Development Corporation
Calgary Regional Planning Commission
Cooper, G.S.
Cirrus Land Corporation Ltd.
Location
14-36-026-01W5
Less detail

Decision 78-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2117
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
770082
Title
Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1978 (permit to construct a pipeline in the unit 48 of the east crossfield area)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1978 (permit to construct a pipeline in the unit 48 of the east crossfield area)
Date
1978
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
770082
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Crossfield East field
Gas pipeline
Gathering line
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
NTS 82O
NTS 82P
Pipeline route
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision on application for a sour gas pipeline from a point in LSD 7-34-28-29 W4M to LSD 9-36-28-1 W5M
Interveners
Keiler, K.F.
Whittaker, D.
Risler, W.
Less detail

Decision 78-10

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2110
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
780017
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1978 (Construct a pipeline from Waterton to Cochran)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1978 (Construct a pipeline from Waterton to Cochran)
Date
1978
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
780017
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Cochrane area
Ethane
Liquefied petroleum gas
Pipeline construction permit
Product pipeline
Waterton area
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Land reclamation
Land use
NTS 82G
NTS 82J
NTS 82O
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Right of way
Route selection
Safety
Transmission corridor
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 78-10 on application No. 780017 to construct a pipeline to transmit ethane, propane, butane, and pentanes plus from Shell Waterton gas plant in LSD 1-24-4-1 W5M to the Alberta natural gas extraction plant in LSD 10-16-26-4 W5M near Cochrane.
Interveners
The Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Foothills Pipe Lines (Alta.) Limited
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas cjompany Limited
Harvie, D.S.
LePatourel, J.
LePatourel, E.
Meston, G.R.
Harper-Penner Group
Rowland Family
Gardner, H.R.
Less detail

Decision 78-11

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2109
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
770900
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Ltd., 1978 (permit to construct a secondary line for sour natural gas in the Jumping Pound area)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Ltd., 1978 (permit to construct a secondary line for sour natural gas in the Jumping Pound area)
Date
1978
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
770900
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Atmospheric diffusion
Environmental impact
Hydrogen sulphide
Nomograph
NTS 82O
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Right of way
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 78-11 on application No. 770900 to construct a sour gas pipeline from LSD 9-24-26-7 W5M to LSD 4-19-26-6 W5M; Board hearing 1978-02-09; reopened 1978-05-09
Interveners
Lamb, T.
Fish, J.R.
Less detail

Decision 79-14

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2082
Applicant
Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Limited
Application Number
771016
771017
771018
Title
Decision on application by Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Ltd., 1979 (approval to resume operation of three sections of pipeline - Olds, Carstairs and Didsbury areas)
Date
1979
Title
Decision on application by Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Ltd., 1979 (approval to resume operation of three sections of pipeline - Olds, Carstairs and Didsbury areas)
Date
1979
Applicant
Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Limited
Application Number
771016
771017
771018
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Carstairs area
Gas pipeline
Olds area
Sour gas
ID-79-02
Fibreglass liner
Gas producing
Lining
Maintenance
NTS 82O
NTS 82P
Pipe testing
Pipeline corrosion
Pipeline leak
Safety
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 79-14 on application No. 771016, No. 771017 and No. 771018 to resume operation of three segments of secondary pipeline for the transmission of sour gas in the Carstairs, Didsbury & Olds areas (TP.30-32, R.28(W4) to R.1 (W5)).
Less detail

Decision 80-10

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2029
Applicant
Town of Sundre
Application Number
800359
Title
Decision on application by Town of Sundre, 1980 (relocation of a pipeline)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Town of Sundre, 1980 (relocation of a pipeline)
Date
1980
Applicant
Town of Sundre
Application Number
800359
Hearing Panel
Goodman CJ
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Pipeline route
Relocation
Sundre area
Cost analysis
Encroachment
NTS 82O
Regional planning
Right of way
Urban development
Legal References
Pipeline Act S34
Notes
Decision 80-10 on application No. 800359 to have Board Order the relocation of a pipeline owned by Alberta Gas Trunk Line located in section 33-32-5 W5M and section 4-33-5 W5M so as not to affect future development of the Town of Sundre under its annexation plan.
Interveners
The Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
EMA Holdings Ltd.
Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd.
Newall, A.P.
Less detail

Decision 81-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2006
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
790732
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1981 (Enhanced recovery by ethane enriched miscible flood - Caroline Viking A pool)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1981 (Enhanced recovery by ethane enriched miscible flood - Caroline Viking A pool)
Date
1981
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
790732
Hearing Panel
Bray JA
Keushnig HR
Stafford GH
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Caroline field
Enhanced recovery scheme
Miscible displacement
Depletion
Design criteria
Gas saturation
Injection pressure
Monitoring
NTS 82O
NTS 83B
Oil recovery
Reservoir characteristic
Reservoir performance
Sweep efficiency
Viking Fm
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
Decision 81-2 (with unnumbered Examiners report attached) on application No. 790732 for an ethane enriched miscible gas flood scheme in a portion of the Caroline Viking A pool (TP.33-36, R. 3-7, W5M).
Interveners
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Wintershall Oil of Canada Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 81-12

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1996
Applicant
Phillips Petroleum Company Western Hemisphere
Application Number
801022
Title
Decision on application by Phillips Petroleum Company Western Hemisphere, 1981 (gas processing plant - Morley-Ghost River area)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Phillips Petroleum Company Western Hemisphere, 1981 (gas processing plant - Morley-Ghost River area)
Date
1981
Applicant
Phillips Petroleum Company Western Hemisphere
Application Number
801022
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Weaver Dr. RS
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Indians of North America
Morley field
Salter field
Sour gas
Air quality
Capacity
Desulphurization
Emission
Environmental impact
Flare
Hydrogen sulphide removal
Jurisdiction
Land use
Locating
Monitoring
NTS 82O
Plant location
Safety
Site survey
Sulphur dioxide
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
Decision 81-12 on application No. 801022 to process sour gas in one of 3 possible sites in TP.26, R.7-8, W5M; Board hearing 1981-04-22/24/27
Interveners
Stoney Band of Indians
Council of the Summer Village of Ghost Lake
Ghost Valley Protection Committee
Wasson, W.A.
Alberta Outfitters Association
The 6th Calgary Boy Scouts Group Committee
Kings' Fold Foundation
David H. McDougall Ranch
Wolf, R.E.
Calgary Regional Planning Commission
Improvement District No. 8
Less detail

Decision 82-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2075
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
810092
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1982 (Jumping Pound gas processing plant)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1982 (Jumping Pound gas processing plant)
Date
1982
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
810092
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Strom NA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Ethane
Gas processing plant
Jumping Pound field
Scot desulphurization
Sour gas
Emission
Environmental impact
IL-80-24
Expansion
Flare
Injection
Liquefied natural gas
Monitoring
NTS 82O
Pollution control
Safety
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Underground
Waste disposal
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S2
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S4
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision 82-3 on application No. 810092 to add a deep-cut unit for hydrocarbon liquids extraction and to modernize sulphur recovery facilities at Jumping Pound gas processing plant (TP.25, R.5, W5M); Board hearing 1981-10-05/06/07/08/09 and 1981-11-02/03/04/05/23/27; see related Decisions D82-12, Decision report 82-E, and for local interveners cost awards Decision D83-8; see also related report 82-D
Interveners
Esso Resources Canada Limited
Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
Hanen, Z.
Rumsey Ranches
Russell, A.
Canadian Wildlife Federation
Wolf, R.E.
Less detail

Decision 82-15|82-15 Addendum

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2063
Applicant
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
810650
810849
Title
Decision on application by Canterra Energy Ltd. and Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (Ram River gas processing plant and Strachan gas processing plant) (and addendum)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Canterra Energy Ltd. and Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (Ram River gas processing plant and Strachan gas processing plant) (and addendum)
Date
1982
Applicant
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
810650
810849
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Strom NA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Blackstone field
Brazeau River field
Chedderville field
Gas processing plant
Hanlan field
Ricinus field
Sour gas
Stolberg field
Strachan field
Capacity
Citizen participation
Design criteria
Desulphurization
Emission
Energy development
Environmental impact
IL-80-24
Expansion
NTS 82O
NTS 83B
NTS 83C
Revision
Sulfreen process
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision 82-15 and addendum on application No. 810650 by Canterra (formerly Aquitaine) to amend approval No. 2820 to include additional fields and increase sulphur recovery for its Ram River gas plant located in section 2-37-10 W5M and on application No. 810849 by Gulf to amend approval No. 3351 to include additional fields and increase sulphur recovery for its Strachan gas plant located in section 35-37-9 W5M; Board hearing 1982-04-26/27 & 1982-05-03/04/05/06; see Decision D82-2 for related pipeline applications
Interveners
Rocky Veterinary Clinic Ltd.
Federation of Alberta Naturalists
The Alberta Fish and Game Association
Public Advisory Committee to the Environment Council of Alberta
Red Deer Fish and Game Association
Less detail

Decision 82-C

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2312
Applicant
TransAlta Utilities Corporation
Edmonton Power
Application Number
810222
810683
Title
Decision on application by TransAlta Utilities Corporation, 1982 (Keephills decision on application by Edmonton Power, 1982 (Genesee units 1 and 2 com generation expansion 1985-1987 Keephills and Genesee power plants
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by TransAlta Utilities Corporation, 1982 (Keephills decision on application by Edmonton Power, 1982 (Genesee units 1 and 2 com generation expansion 1985-1987 Keephills and Genesee power plants
Date
1982
Applicant
TransAlta Utilities Corporation
Edmonton Power
Application Number
810222
810683
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Goodman CJ
Warne GA
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Electric power
Descriptors
Electric power demand
Electric power project
Genesee power plant
Keephills power project
Thermal power plant
Alberta
Benefit cost analysis
Capacity
Coal - fuel
Cooling
Cost analysis
Economic analysis
Economic forecasting
Electric power supply
Energy development
Environmental impact
Expansion
Forecasting
Land reclamation
NTS 82O
NTS 83G
Planning
Reliability
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Notes
ERCB Report 82-C on application No. 810222 by TransAlta to construct Keephills unit 3 and 4 and on application No. 810683 by Edmonton Power to advance commissioning dates for Genesee units 1 and 2; Board hearing on Keephills 1981-06-24/25; Board hearing on Genesee 1981-11-25; See also related reports ERCB 79-AA (Genesee Power Plant) and ERCB 80-B (Keephills Power Plant expansion)
Interveners
TransAlta Utilities Corporation (Formerly Calgary Power Ltd.)
Sabey, DO
Kay, M
Fraser, WL
Lyons, GD
Crowe, T
Chorel, M
Railton, J
Robinson, J
Alberta Power Limited
Beames, J
Frey, JR
Jones, RG
McDermid, N
City of Edmonton (Edmonton Power)
Sherk, M
Kyte, E
Pelletier, D
Pettican, RA
Warren, K
Shinyei, F
DeSarkar, A
Electric Utility Planning Council (EUPC)
Ferguson, TH
Gardiner, P
Paicu, G
Gunn, J
The County of Parkland No. 31
Twach, T
Breckenridge, C
Committee on Keephills Environment
Ewashko, J
Department of Environment
Shewchuk, P
Fringe Environment Area Residents
Staszenski, B
Friends of the River
Smith, JH
Less detail

Decision 82-E

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2314
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
810148
810149
810150
810663
810714
810715
810716
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1982 Shell proposed Moose and Whiskey Pipelines and related facilities, Kananaskis area
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1982 Shell proposed Moose and Whiskey Pipelines and related facilities, Kananaskis area
Date
1982
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
810148
810149
810150
810663
810714
810715
810716
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Strom NA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Battery
Compressor station
Fuel gas pipeline
Gathering line
Gas pipeline
Kananaskis Area
Moose field
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Water disposal
Water pipeline
Whiskey field
Atmospheric diffusion
Conflict
Disposal well
Economic analysis
Energy development
Environmental impact
ID-81-03
IL-80-24
Gas producing
Hydrogen sulphide
Land reclamation
Land use
NTS 82J
NTS 82O
Pipeline crossing
Pipeline design
Pipeline leak
Pipeline route
Recreational facility
Safety
Sulphur recovery
Waste disposal
Waste water
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Pipeline Act
Notes
ERCB Reort 82-E on application no. 810148 for a pipeline to transport sweet fuel gas from Quirk Creek Plant to proposed Whiskey and Moose compressor stations; on application no. 810149 for pipeline to to transport sour gas from proposed compressor to Quirk Creek plant; on application no. 810150 for pipeline to transport sour gas from wellheads to proposed Moose and Whiskey compressor stations; on application no. 810663 for a pipeline to transport sour water from proposed compressor station to an injection well; on application no. 810714 to construct a gas battery with dehydration and liquid separation facilities and one compressor (LSD 4-35-21-5, W5M); on application no. 810715 to construct gas battery with dehydration and liquid separation facilities and two compressors (LSD 13-22-22-6, W5); and on application no. 810716 to dispose of sour water produced from Moose and Whiskey fields by injection into Mississippian Turner Valley Fm; Board hearing 1982-01-06/07/08/09/10/13/14/15 & 1982-02-01; See related ERCB Decisions 82-3, 82-12 and Report 82-D; See also ERCB Decision D83-22 on later Shell application (No. 830603) for Board to reconsider decision contained in this report
Less detail

Decision 83-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2465
Applicant
Champlin Canada Ltd.
Application Number
821106
Title
Decision on application by Champlin Canada Ltd., 1983 (application for a well licence)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Champlin Canada Ltd., 1983 (application for a well licence)
Date
1983
Applicant
Champlin Canada Ltd.
Application Number
821106
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Morin EJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Lanaway field
Well licence
Cost analysis
Environmental impact
Flare
Geologic interpretation
Locating
Noise (sound)
NTS 82O
Oil producing
Pollution
Producing equipment
Target area
Viking Fm
Well site
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S17
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
Decision No. D83-1 on application No. 821106 for well licence to reenter abandoned well Amoco Lanaway 11-16-35-3 W5M to recomplete well to obtain oil production from Viking FM.
Interveners
Tingle, S.M.
Tingle, G.
Location
11-16-035-03W5
Less detail

Decision 83-04

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1201
Applicant
Citadel Resources Ltd.
Scion Petroleum Engineering Limited
Application Number
820763
Title
Examiners report on application by Citadel Resources Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing plant Sundre area)
Date
1983
Title
Examiners report on application by Citadel Resources Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing plant Sundre area)
Date
1983
Applicant
Citadel Resources Ltd.
Scion Petroleum Engineering Limited
Application Number
820763
Hearing Panel
Homeniuk TF
Mazurek LA
Nichol JR
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Sundre area
Air pollution
Air quality
Design criteria
Emergency procedure
Emission
Health
Locating
Monitoring
Noise (sound)
NTS 82O
Plant location
Safety
Sulphur dioxide
Truck
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Examiners report E83-4 on application No. 820763 by Scion Petroleum & Gildex Ltd. on behalf of Citadel for approval to construct a sour gas processing plant in LSD 13-20-33-5 W5M; Examiners hearing 1982-10-27 adjourned to 1982-11-25
Interveners
Residents in the County of Mountainview
Alberda, R.
Less detail

Decision 83-13

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1192
Applicant
Citadel Resources Ltd.
Scion Petroleum Engineering Limited
Application Number
830198
Title
Examiners report on application by Citadel Resources Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing plant Sundre area)
Date
1983
Title
Examiners report on application by Citadel Resources Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing plant Sundre area)
Date
1983
Applicant
Citadel Resources Ltd.
Scion Petroleum Engineering Limited
Application Number
830198
Hearing Panel
Homeniuk TF
Mazurek LA
Nichol JR
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Caroline field
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Hydrogen sulphide removal
Land value
Locating
Noise (sound)
NTS 82O
Pollution
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E83-13 on application No. 830198 by Scion Petroleum on behalf of Citadel for approval to construct a sour gas processing plant in LSD 3 of section 26, TP.33, R.6 W5M in the Caroline field.
Interveners
Dome Petroleum Limited
MHL & Associates Ltd.
Petersen, E.
Petersen, G.
Less detail

Decision 83-15

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2298
Applicant
TransAlta Utilities Corporation
City of Calgary
Application Number
820874
820889
Title
Decision on application by TransAlta Utilities Corporation, 1983 (138 KV transmission line to north east Calgary area); Decision on application by City of Calgary, 1983 (240 KV transmission line in north east Calgary area)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by TransAlta Utilities Corporation, 1983 (138 KV transmission line to north east Calgary area); Decision on application by City of Calgary, 1983 (240 KV transmission line in north east Calgary area)
Date
1983
Applicant
TransAlta Utilities Corporation
City of Calgary
Application Number
820874
820889
Hearing Panel
Goodman CJ
Bohme VE
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Transmission line
Calgary area
Electric power demand
Environmental impact
NTS 82I
NTS 82J
NTS 82O
NTS 82P
Oil refinery
Regional planning
Reliability
Route selection
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S12
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S16
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S18
Notes
Decision D83-15 on application No. 820874 to construct and operate a 138 KV transmission line CP 771L and other related facilities to run from existing Turbo refinery substation CP 391 S to City of Calgary boundary and on application 820889 by the City of Calgary for a permit to construct a 240 KV transmission line CC 11,83L and a licence to operate it at 138 KV to run north from the City'S existing No. 11 substation and connect with TransAlta's line at the City boundary (TP.21-26, R.29 W4M to R.1 W5M).
Interveners
Turbo Resources Limited
Genstar Development Company
Bar OW Ranches Ltd.
Wotzke, M.
Less detail

Decision 83-17

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2316
Applicant
ICG Resources Ltd.
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Petrogas Processing Ltd.
Application Number
830165
830166
830167
830460
830461
830488
830489
Title
Decision on application by ICG Resources Ltd., 1983 (to drill well and construct pipelines in Crossfield Airdrie area); Decision on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., 1983 (special drilling spacing unit and licence to drill a well in Crossfield Airdrie area); Decision on application by Petrogas Processing Ltd., 1983 (to construct two pipelines in Crossfiled Airdrie area) 1983
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by ICG Resources Ltd., 1983 (to drill well and construct pipelines in Crossfield Airdrie area); Decision on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., 1983 (special drilling spacing unit and licence to drill a well in Crossfield Airdrie area); Decision on application by Petrogas Processing Ltd., 1983 (to construct two pipelines in Crossfiled Airdrie area) 1983
Date
1983
Applicant
ICG Resources Ltd.
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Petrogas Processing Ltd.
Application Number
830165
830166
830167
830460
830461
830488
830489
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Crossfield Airdrie area
Crossfield East field
Drilling spacing unit
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Gathering line
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Well licence
Blowout control
Blowout preventer
Design criteria
Emergency procedure
Equity
ID-81-03
ID-OG-76-02
Gas producing
Geologic interpretation
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 82O
NTS 82P
Pipeline route
Route selection
Safety
Target area
Wabamun Gp
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.020
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.050
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision on application No. 830167 by ICG to drill a well on application No. 830165 by ICG to construct sweet fule gas pipeline to the well, on application No. 830166 by ICG to construct sour gas pipeline to tie well into existing Canoxy gas gathering system on application No. 830461 by Canoxy for a special drilling spacing unit and on application No. 830460 by Canoxy to drill a well, on application No. 830488 by Petrogas for sour gas pipeline proposed well to existing Canoxy gathering system and application No. 830489 by Petrogas to construct sweet fuel gas pipeline to the well sites (all in TP.27, R.28 W4 to R.1 W5)
Interveners
Austin Exploration Ltd.
Associated Engineering Services Ltd.
Fletcher, A.T.
Fletcher, H.
Less detail

Decision 83-25

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2296
Applicant
Petro-Canada
Application Number
830736
830737
Title
Decision on application by Petro-Canada, 1983 (sour gas pipeline, fuel gas pipeline, Benjamin field)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Petro-Canada, 1983 (sour gas pipeline, fuel gas pipeline, Benjamin field)
Date
1983
Applicant
Petro-Canada
Application Number
830736
830737
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Brushett ER
Webber HJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Benjamin field
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Gathering line
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Environmental impact
Decision D1983-8
Decision D1983-9
Guide 31
Interveners cost
Land reclamation
Land use
NTS 82O
Pipeline route
Right of way
Route selection
Soil conservation
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision D83-25 on application No. 830736 to construct 23.8 km of 88.9 and 168.3 MM outside diameter pipeline to transport sour gas from wells in LSD 11-33-28-7 W5M to gas plant in LSD 10-13-30-7 W5M and on application No. 830737 to construct 17.1 km of 60.3 MM outside diameter pipeline to transport fuel gas from existing Shell line in LSD 11-18-30-7 W5M to the well sites.
Interveners
Canterra Energy Ltd.
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Alberta Wilderness Association
Less detail

Decision 84-16

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1160
Applicant
Natomas Exploration of Canada Ltd.
Application Number
830956
Title
Examiners report on application by Natomas Exploration of Canada Ltd., 1984 (common purchaser, commingled production Caroline Basal Mannville A, L & Z pools and an unidentified pool in the well Natomas et al Caroline 6-36-34-5)
Date
1984
Title
Examiners report on application by Natomas Exploration of Canada Ltd., 1984 (common purchaser, commingled production Caroline Basal Mannville A, L & Z pools and an unidentified pool in the well Natomas et al Caroline 6-36-34-5)
Date
1984
Applicant
Natomas Exploration of Canada Ltd.
Application Number
830956
Hearing Panel
Pow JR
Dilay JD
Lillo HO
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Common purchaser
Descriptors
Caroline field
Commingled production
Common purchaser
Fracturing
Gas producing
Gas purchase
Gas recovery
Lease drainage
Mannville Gp
NTS 82O
Reservoir boundary
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S10
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S40
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S45
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S3.050
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S15.020
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E84-16 on application No. 830956 for an Order declaring Dow Chemical Canada INC. and TransCanada pipelines as common purchasers of gas produced from the Caroline Basal Mannville A, L, and Z pools and from currently undesignated Mannville pool, and for an Order approving the commingling in the wellbore of the gas produced from the above-noted wells; Examiners hearing 1984-03-12/14/15
Interveners
Dome Petroleum Limited
TransCanada PipeLines Limited
Less detail

Decision 84-28

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1690
Applicant
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Application Number
830495
Title
Decision on application by Canterra Energy Ltd., 1984 (critical sour well in the Sundre area)
Date
1984
Title
Decision on application by Canterra Energy Ltd., 1984 (critical sour well in the Sundre area)
Date
1984
Applicant
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Application Number
830495
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Bergen area
Sour gas
Sundre area
Well licence
Blowout control
Blowout preventer
Casing string design
Drilling program
Emergency procedure
ID-81-03
Exploratory well
Gas producing
Gas well
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
Inspecting
Leduc Fm
NTS 82O
Marketing
Plugging
Producing well
Safety
Safety equipment
Solvent
Sulphur
Well classification
Notes
Decision D84-28 on application No. 830495 for a licence to drill a critical sour gas well in the Sundre area in LSD 12-12-32-6 W5M to evaluate and obtain production from the Leduc FM; Board hearing 1984-08-01/02/03/07/08/09/10/11
Interveners
Bergen Ratepayers Association
Inter-Varsity Christian Fellowship
Community of Fallen Timber
Town of Sundre
Mountain View Land Holders Group
City of Red Deer
Amoco Canada Petroleum Co. Ltd.
Burton, S.
Cloakey, G.E.
Goodwin, B.
Goodwin, M.
Grimstead, J.
Grimstead, C.
Halvorson, I.
Halvorson, M.
Worobetz, T.
Worobetz, M.
The Bauman Family
Bauman, Dr. J.A.
Haug, J.
Orr, J.
Huisman, Dr. R.
Newell, A.
Location
12-12-032-06W5
Less detail

117 records – page 1 of 6.