58 records – page 1 of 3.

Decision 75-15

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2164
Applicant
Imperial Oil Limited
Application Number
8845
Title
Decision on application by Imperial Oil Limited, 1975 (licence to drill a well to be located in LSD 4, section 4, township 21, range 4, west of the 5th for the purpose of obtaining and producing gas from the Rundle formation)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Imperial Oil Limited, 1975 (licence to drill a well to be located in LSD 4, section 4, township 21, range 4, west of the 5th for the purpose of obtaining and producing gas from the Rundle formation)
Date
1975
Applicant
Imperial Oil Limited
Application Number
8845
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Quirk Creek field
Sour gas
Well licence
Gas producing
NTS 82J
Rundle Gp
Surface rights
Notes
Decision 75-15 on application No. 8845 to drill a well in LSD 4-4-21-4 W5M to obtain and produce gas from the Rundle formation.
Interveners
Three Point Creek Ranching Co. Ltd.
Inland Research Ltd.
McKenney, B.
Location
04-04-021-04W5
Less detail

Decision 78-10

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2110
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
780017
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1978 (Construct a pipeline from Waterton to Cochran)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1978 (Construct a pipeline from Waterton to Cochran)
Date
1978
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
780017
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Cochrane area
Ethane
Liquefied petroleum gas
Pipeline construction permit
Product pipeline
Waterton area
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Land reclamation
Land use
NTS 82G
NTS 82J
NTS 82O
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Right of way
Route selection
Safety
Transmission corridor
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 78-10 on application No. 780017 to construct a pipeline to transmit ethane, propane, butane, and pentanes plus from Shell Waterton gas plant in LSD 1-24-4-1 W5M to the Alberta natural gas extraction plant in LSD 10-16-26-4 W5M near Cochrane.
Interveners
The Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Foothills Pipe Lines (Alta.) Limited
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas cjompany Limited
Harvie, D.S.
LePatourel, J.
LePatourel, E.
Meston, G.R.
Harper-Penner Group
Rowland Family
Gardner, H.R.
Less detail

Decision 80-21

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2018
Applicant
Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
Application Number
800462
800490
800433
800492
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited, 1980 (permits to construct pipelines for the transmission of natural gas - Calgary area)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited, 1980 (permits to construct pipelines for the transmission of natural gas - Calgary area)
Date
1980
Applicant
Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
Application Number
800462
800490
800433
800492
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Calgary area
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
NTS 82J
Pipeline route
Transportation corridor
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 80-21 on application No. 800462 to construct pipeline to transport natural gas from existing AGTL line in LSD 15-20-22-3 W5M to proposed regulator station in LSD 16-19-22-1 W5M (Priddis lateral A), on application No. 800490 to construct proposed regulator station (Turner Valley GATE station), on application No. 800433 to construct pipeline to transport gas from proposed regulator station in LSD 16-19-22-1 W5M to proposed regulator station in LSD 13-23-22-1 W5M (Priddis lateral B) and on application No. 800492 for this regulator station in LSD 13-23-22-1 W5M (south Calgary GATE station); Board hearing 1980-09-09/10/23/24 ; see related Decision 81-27 on later application for similar facilities
Interveners
R.Z. Holdings Ltd.
Hartel Holdings Co. Ltd.
Ulster Developments Ltd.
Paperny, M.
Trafalgar Investments Ltd.
Arnold Investments Ltd.
Rogers Pass Recreation Ltd.
Southern, F.D.
Southern, R.D.
Spruce Meadows Complex
Rauh, W.
Rauh, F.
Hope-Ross Group
Big Springs Ranch Ltd.
Brooks, D.
Brooks, M.
Caywood, E.
Drager, J.C.
French, B.
Gordon, E.L.
Hope-Ross, R.M.
Hope-Ross, W.
Klyuzak, A.G.
Sweeney, E.A.
Sweeney, E.G.
Van Wielingen, G.A.
Drager, J.M.
Southern, S.D.
Arthurs, A.G.
Waddell, W.A.
Approval
Denied
Less detail

Decision 80-D

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2325
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
780709
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1980 500 KV transmission line Langdon - Phillips pass
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1980 500 KV transmission line Langdon - Phillips pass
Date
1980
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
780709
Hearing Type
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Calgary area
Crowsnest Pass
High voltage
Power system interconnection
Transmission line
Agricultural land
Alberta
British Columbia
Environmental impact
Health
Land use
NTS 82G
NTS 82H
NTS 82I
NTS 82J
Right of way
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S13
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
Notes
ERCB report 80-D on application No. 780709 to build and operate a 500 KV substation near Langdon and a transmission line linking the substation with B.C. Hydro at Phillipps Pass (TP.6-23, R.26 W4 to R.5 W5); Board hearing 1979-10-09 through 1979-11-02 (19 days), 1979-11-05/06/07/08/12/ see also ERCB report 82-A for Decision on proceeding No. 810326 to consider alternate points of interconnection with B.C. Hydro
Less detail

Decision 81-27

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1981
Applicant
Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
Application Number
810487
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited, 1981 (secondary natural gas lines and regulator facilities Calgary – Priddis areas)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited, 1981 (secondary natural gas lines and regulator facilities Calgary – Priddis areas)
Date
1981
Applicant
Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
Application Number
810487
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Calgary area
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Energy development
Gas demand
Land value
NTS 82J
Pipeline route
Regional planning
Route selection
Transmission corridor
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 81-27 on application No. 810487 to construct about 25 km of 406.4 MM pipeline and associated REGULATING facilities to transport natural gas from an existing Nova pipeline near Priddis to proposed regulator station in south Calgary (TP.22, R.1-3, W5M); Board hearing 1981-09-08/09/10 see related Decision 80-21
Interveners
City of Calgary
Red Deer Lake Community Association
Priddis Community Association
Hope-Ross, W.
Drager, J.C.
Van Weilingen, G.A.
Arnold Investments Ltd.
Babichuk, O.
Big Springs Ranch Ltd.
Brooks, D.
Kluzak, G.
Krassman, M.
Sweeney, E.
Waddell, W.A.
Southern, Mr. & Mrs.
R.Z. Holdings Ltd.
Hartel Holdings Co. Ltd.
Ulster Developments Ltd.
Paperny, M.
Trafalga Investments Ltd.
Very, R.A.
Allen, G.
Payne, B.A.
Less detail

Decision 82-12

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2066
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
810520
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1982 (Quirk Creek gas processing plant)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1982 (Quirk Creek gas processing plant)
Date
1982
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
810520
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Strom NA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Moose field
Quirk Creek plant
Sour gas
Whiskey field
Air pollution
Air quality
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
ID-80-02
IL-71-29
IL-80-24
Expansion
Hydrogen sulphide
Injection
Monitoring
NTS 82J
Pollution control
Procedure
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Underground
Waste disposal
Water pollution
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S2
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S4
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision 82-12 on application No. 810520 to utilize spare plant capacity to process sour gas reserves from Moose and Whiskey fields at the Quirk Creek gas plant located in the south half of section 4-21-4 W5M; Board hearing 1981-11-04/05/06/23/24/25/26 and 1981-12-14/15/16/17/18 and 1982-01-05/06; see also related Decision D82-3 on Jumping Pound gas plant and ERCB report 82-E for Decisions on related pipeline applications by Shell and Decision D83-8 for local interveners cost awards; see also related report 82-D
Interveners
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Hanen, Z.
Rumsey Ranches
Russell, A.
Canadian Wildlife Federation
Wolf, R.E.
Less detail

Decision 82-E

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2314
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
810148
810149
810150
810663
810714
810715
810716
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1982 Shell proposed Moose and Whiskey Pipelines and related facilities, Kananaskis area
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1982 Shell proposed Moose and Whiskey Pipelines and related facilities, Kananaskis area
Date
1982
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
810148
810149
810150
810663
810714
810715
810716
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Strom NA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Battery
Compressor station
Fuel gas pipeline
Gathering line
Gas pipeline
Kananaskis Area
Moose field
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Water disposal
Water pipeline
Whiskey field
Atmospheric diffusion
Conflict
Disposal well
Economic analysis
Energy development
Environmental impact
ID-81-03
IL-80-24
Gas producing
Hydrogen sulphide
Land reclamation
Land use
NTS 82J
NTS 82O
Pipeline crossing
Pipeline design
Pipeline leak
Pipeline route
Recreational facility
Safety
Sulphur recovery
Waste disposal
Waste water
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Pipeline Act
Notes
ERCB Reort 82-E on application no. 810148 for a pipeline to transport sweet fuel gas from Quirk Creek Plant to proposed Whiskey and Moose compressor stations; on application no. 810149 for pipeline to to transport sour gas from proposed compressor to Quirk Creek plant; on application no. 810150 for pipeline to transport sour gas from wellheads to proposed Moose and Whiskey compressor stations; on application no. 810663 for a pipeline to transport sour water from proposed compressor station to an injection well; on application no. 810714 to construct a gas battery with dehydration and liquid separation facilities and one compressor (LSD 4-35-21-5, W5M); on application no. 810715 to construct gas battery with dehydration and liquid separation facilities and two compressors (LSD 13-22-22-6, W5); and on application no. 810716 to dispose of sour water produced from Moose and Whiskey fields by injection into Mississippian Turner Valley Fm; Board hearing 1982-01-06/07/08/09/10/13/14/15 & 1982-02-01; See related ERCB Decisions 82-3, 82-12 and Report 82-D; See also ERCB Decision D83-22 on later Shell application (No. 830603) for Board to reconsider decision contained in this report
Less detail

Decision 83-12

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2331
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
821137
Title
Decision on public inquiry to consider potential conflicts between development of sour gas reserves and residential development in the Okotoks area
Date
1983
Title
Decision on public inquiry to consider potential conflicts between development of sour gas reserves and residential development in the Okotoks area
Date
1983
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
821137
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Bohme VE
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Inquiry
Land use
Descriptors
Conflict
Energy development
Land use
Okotoks area
Regional planning
Risk
Sour gas
Urban development
Urban planning
Encroachment
Gas pipeline
Gas producing
Gas reserve
Gas well
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 82I
NTS 82J
Safety
Notes
Decision No. D83-12 (inquiry report) on proceeding No. 821137 regarding conflicts between the development of sour gas reserves and residential development in the Okotoks area covering TP.18-24, R.27 W4M to R.1 W5M;see also related Decision D83-13 on application No. 820346 (application by Canadian Occidental for sour gas processing plant in the Okotoks area); Board inquiry 1983-03-?
Interveners
Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd.
Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Ltd.
Bow North Surface Rights Association
City of Calgary
Canadian Occidental Petroleums Ltd.
Canadian Petroleum Association
Canadian Superior Oil Ltd.
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Committee for Toxic Pollutant Controls
Goldenview Farms Ltd.
J.M. Huber Corporation
Makale & Kyllo Planning Associates Ltd.
Mitchell Energy Corporation
Ollerenshaw, F.J.
Rocher, N.L.
Less detail

Decision 83-15

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2298
Applicant
TransAlta Utilities Corporation
City of Calgary
Application Number
820874
820889
Title
Decision on application by TransAlta Utilities Corporation, 1983 (138 KV transmission line to north east Calgary area); Decision on application by City of Calgary, 1983 (240 KV transmission line in north east Calgary area)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by TransAlta Utilities Corporation, 1983 (138 KV transmission line to north east Calgary area); Decision on application by City of Calgary, 1983 (240 KV transmission line in north east Calgary area)
Date
1983
Applicant
TransAlta Utilities Corporation
City of Calgary
Application Number
820874
820889
Hearing Panel
Goodman CJ
Bohme VE
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Transmission line
Calgary area
Electric power demand
Environmental impact
NTS 82I
NTS 82J
NTS 82O
NTS 82P
Oil refinery
Regional planning
Reliability
Route selection
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S12
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S16
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S18
Notes
Decision D83-15 on application No. 820874 to construct and operate a 138 KV transmission line CP 771L and other related facilities to run from existing Turbo refinery substation CP 391 S to City of Calgary boundary and on application 820889 by the City of Calgary for a permit to construct a 240 KV transmission line CC 11,83L and a licence to operate it at 138 KV to run north from the City'S existing No. 11 substation and connect with TransAlta's line at the City boundary (TP.21-26, R.29 W4M to R.1 W5M).
Interveners
Turbo Resources Limited
Genstar Development Company
Bar OW Ranches Ltd.
Wotzke, M.
Less detail

Decision 83-17

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1188
Applicant
TransAlta Utilities Corporation
Application Number
830449
Title
Examiners report on application by TransAlta Utilities Corporation, 1983 (138-KV transmission line High River Black Diamond)
Date
1983
Title
Examiners report on application by TransAlta Utilities Corporation, 1983 (138-KV transmission line High River Black Diamond)
Date
1983
Applicant
TransAlta Utilities Corporation
Application Number
830449
Hearing Panel
Antonio HA
Allman RJ
Yu JNG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Electric substation
High River area
Okotoks area
Transmission line
Turner Valley area
Electric power demand
Environmental impact
NTS 82I
NTS 82J
Reliability
Revision
Route selection
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S12
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S16
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S18
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E83-17 on application No. 830449 for permits, licences and approvals to construct and operate a 138-KV transmission line between the High River substation 65 S and the Black Diamond substation 392 S, and to alter these two substations and the Hartell substation 512 S and other related matters (TP.19-20 R.29 W4M to R.2 W5M).
Interveners
McIntyre, G.W.
McIntyre, B.
McIntrye, H.
MacKillop, L.
MacKillop, G.
Bice, P.R.
Bice, A.T.
Ruitenschild, B.
Ruitenschild, J.
Tucker Farms
Noble, J.
Noble, M.
Less detail

Decision 83-22

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1183
Applicant
Home Oil Company Limited
Application Number
830555
Title
Examiners report on application by Home Oil Company Limited, 1983 (application for amendment to the list of approved injectors Turner Valley Rundle pool unit No. 6)
Date
1983
Title
Examiners report on application by Home Oil Company Limited, 1983 (application for amendment to the list of approved injectors Turner Valley Rundle pool unit No. 6)
Date
1983
Applicant
Home Oil Company Limited
Application Number
830555
Hearing Panel
Bray JA
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Unit agreement
Descriptors
Turner Valley field
Unit operation
Geologic interpretation
Injection well
NTS 82J
Pressure maintenance
Reservoir performance
Revision
Waterflooding
Legal References
Turner Valley Unit Operations Act S29
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E83-22 on application No. 830555 to amend Board Order No. TVU 6 to change the list of approved injection wells in TP.20-21, R.3-4 W5M.
Less detail

Decision 84-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1972
Applicant
Western Decalta Petroleum (1977) Limited.
Application Number
831044
Title
Decision on application by Western Decalta Petroleum (1977) Limited, 1984 (Diamond Valley gas project Turner Valley field and area)
Date
1984
Title
Decision on application by Western Decalta Petroleum (1977) Limited, 1984 (Diamond Valley gas project Turner Valley field and area)
Date
1984
Applicant
Western Decalta Petroleum (1977) Limited.
Application Number
831044
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Homeniuk TF
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Diamond Valley gas plant
Gas processing plant
Hartell area
Sour gas
Turner Valley area
Air quality
Emission
Environmental impact
IL-80-24
Hydrogen sulphide removal
Land value
NTS 82J
Plant location
Pollution control
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision D84-3 on application No. 831044 to construct a gas plant in the Hartell area south of Turner Valley in LSD 10-12-19-2 W5M or LSD 10-8-19-2 W5M (proposed Diamond Valley gas plant) to replace Western Decalta's existing Turner Valley gas plant.
Interveners
Home Oil Company Limited
Mosby, B.A.
Noble, G.F.
Tongue Creek Area Residents
Hartell Area Residents
Wyatt, S.
Wyatt, D.
Wyatt B.
Wyatt, I.
Less detail

Decision 84-06

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1970
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
830698
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1984 (Quirk Creek gas processing plant)
Date
1984
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1984 (Quirk Creek gas processing plant)
Date
1984
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
830698
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Strom NA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Moose field
Quirk Creek field
Quirk Creek plant
Sour gas
Whiskey field
Air quality
Economic analysis
Emission
Environmental impact
Decision D1982-12
IL-80-24
Hydrogen sulphide removal
NTS 82J
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S42
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision D84-6 on application No. 830698 to use spare plant capacity to process sour gas from the Moose and Whiskey fields at the Quirk Creek gas plant in section 4-21-4 W5M; Board hearing 1983-10-24/27, 1984-01-16/17/19/20/25; see also related Decision 82-12
Interveners
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Z. Hanen and Rumsey Ranches
Square Butte Community Association
Waste Heat Products Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 85-22

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1247
Applicant
Municipal District of Foothills No. 31
Application Number
850316
Title
Decision on application by Municipal District of Foothills No. 31, 1985 (pursuant to section 34 of the Pipeline Act)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Municipal District of Foothills No. 31, 1985 (pursuant to section 34 of the Pipeline Act)
Date
1985
Applicant
Municipal District of Foothills No. 31
Application Number
850316
Hearing Panel
Goodman CJ
Strom NA
Fox EG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Relocation
Construction cost
NTS 82J
Right of way
Legal References
Pipeline Act S34
Notes
Decision D85-22 on application No. 850316 pursuant to section 34 of the Pipeline Act that CWNG lower pipeline crossing secondary road 549 through NW quarter of section 4-21-2 W5M and remove a valve assembly and vault on pipeline crossing same road at no cost to municipality.
Interveners
Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
Less detail

Decision 86-14

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision604
Applicant
Gulf Canada Corporation
Application Number
860072
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Corporation, 1986 (compulsory pooling Chedderville area)
Date
1986
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Corporation, 1986 (compulsory pooling Chedderville area)
Date
1986
Applicant
Gulf Canada Corporation
Application Number
860072
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Strom NA
Pow JR
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Compulsory pooling
Descriptors
Chedderville field
Compulsory pooling
Drilling spacing unit
Gas producing
Leduc Fm
NTS 82J
Ownership
Reservoir boundary
Viking Fm
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S72
Notes
Decision D86-14 on application No. 860072 by Gulf Canada that all tracts within DSU 21-37-7 W5M be operated as a unit for gas production; Board hearing 1986-07-25/28
Interveners
Esso Resources Canada Limited
Canterra Energy Limited
Mobil (CSOL) Oil Canada Limited
Less detail

Decision 87-01|87-01 Addendum

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision239
Applicant
NovaCorp Pipelines Ltd.
Application Number
861300
Title
Decision on application by NovaCorp Pipelines Ltd., 1987 (construct a pipeline and related facilities) (and addendum)
Date
1987
Title
Decision on application by NovaCorp Pipelines Ltd., 1987 (construct a pipeline and related facilities) (and addendum)
Date
1987
Applicant
NovaCorp Pipelines Ltd.
Application Number
861300
Hearing Panel
Goodman CJ
Bellows LA
Homeniuk TF
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Butane
Condensate
Liquefied petroleum gas
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Product pipeline
Turner Valley area
Waterton area
Locating
Land reclamation
NTS 82J
NTS 82G
Pipeline route
Recreational facility
Right of way
Route selection
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision D87-1 on application No. 861300 for permit to construct 162.3 km of 168.3 MM outside diameter pipeline and related facilities for the transmission of condensate and butane from LSD 15-17-4-30 W4M, near Waterton to LSD 14-6-20-2 W5M near Turner Valley; addendum dated 1987-03-06
Interveners
Home Oil Company Limited
Alberta Recreation and Parks
Location
15-17-004-30W4
14-06-020-02W5
Less detail

Decision 93-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision14
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Imperial Pipe Line Company Limited
Koch Pipelines Limited
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Application Number
921014
921015
921016
921017
921018
921019
921020
921021
921022
921023
921024
921025
921026
Title
Decision 93-05 : Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., Imperial Pipe Line Company Limited and Koch Pipelines Limited : Application for permits to construct crude oil / condensate / blended bitumen pipelines and related facilities in Sundre/Edmonton areas) and on application by Northwestern Utilities Limited, 1993 for a review and variance of Decision D91-06
Date
1993
Title
Decision 93-05 : Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., Imperial Pipe Line Company Limited and Koch Pipelines Limited : Application for permits to construct crude oil / condensate / blended bitumen pipelines and related facilities in Sundre/Edmonton areas) and on application by Northwestern Utilities Limited, 1993 for a review and variance of Decision D91-06
Date
1993
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Imperial Pipe Line Company Limited
Koch Pipelines Limited
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Application Number
921014
921015
921016
921017
921018
921019
921020
921021
921022
921023
921024
921025
921026
Hearing Panel
Mink FJ
Evans RG
Berndtsson NG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Sundre area
Bitumen
Condensate
NTS 82J
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S42
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
Decision D93-5 on applications No. 921014 through 921025 to construct pipelines and related facilities for the transportation of crude oils, condensate and blended bitumen between the Sundre area and the Edmonton area and on application No. 921026 by Northwestern Utilities for a review and variance of Decision D91-6 respecting the Edmonton to Sundre expansion pipeline conversion; Board hearing 1992-10-14/15
Interveners
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Alberta Natural Gas Company Ltd.
Alberta Petroleum Marketing Commission
Conoco Canada Limited
Crestar Energy Inc.
Federated Pipe Lines Ltd.
Gulf Canada Resources Limited
Home Oil Company Limited
Northridge Petroleum Marketing Inc.
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Rimbey Pipeline Co. Ltd.
Shell Canada Limited
Less detail

Decision 97-17 Addendum

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2923
Applicant
Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
Application Number
1007046
Title
Decision 97-17 Addendum : Husky Oil Operations Ltd.: Application to construct and operate two sour oil effluent pipelines and associated facilities in the Moose Field
Date
1997
Title
Decision 97-17 Addendum : Husky Oil Operations Ltd.: Application to construct and operate two sour oil effluent pipelines and associated facilities in the Moose Field
Date
1997
Applicant
Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
Application Number
1007046
Hearing Panel
Prince JP
Barfett AC
Schnitzler WJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Pipeline construction permit
Condensate
Moose field
NTS 82J
NTS 82O
Refining
Sour crude
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S29
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
Addendum to Decision on application to construct and operate two sour oil effluent pipelines from Lsd 16 Sec 22 Twp 23 Rge 7 W5M to Lsd 11 Sec 36 Twp 24 Rge 6 W5M, and to operate a multi-well sour oil facility at Lsd 16 Sec 22 Twp 23 Rge 7 W5M; Parkland Refining intervened and presented concerns related to potential implications that approval of this application would have on its Bowden refinery
This addendum constitutes the detailed reasons for decision
Interveners
Parkland Refining Ltd.
Approval
Approved
Location
16-22-023-07W5
11-36-024-06W5
Less detail

Decision 98-09

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2924
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
970451
Title
Decision 98-09 : Shell Canada Limited : Application for a well licence, Quirk Creek field
Date
1998
Title
Decision 98-09 : Shell Canada Limited : Application for a well licence, Quirk Creek field
Date
1998
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
970451
Hearing Panel
McManus BT
Rahnama F
Vrskovy MJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Environmental impact
Gas producing
Kananaskis area
Land use
Land value
Livestock
NTS 82J
Quirk Creek field
Recreational facility
Regional planning
Rural development
Sour gas
Well licence
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Energy Resources Conservation Act S29
Notes
EUB Decision D98-09 on application no. 970451 for a well licence to drill a deviated well from surface location in Lsd 7 Sec 19 Twp 21 Rge 4 W5M to obtain gas production from the Turner Valley Fm; Square Butte Ranches Ltd. filed an objection.
Interveners
Square Butte Ranches Ltd.
Gibb M
Approval
Approved
Approved with conditions
Conditions
Shell shall retain a third-party environmental inspector at all times prior to and during drilling
Inspector shall prepare a report documenting development activities, impacts, and mitigative measures
Access road into Kananaskis Country to be controlled by Shell
Reclamation shall be discussed with Alberta Forest Service and AEP
Temorary work space shall be located to reduce the need for additional clearing
Shell shall use above-ground tanks for waste management
Shell shall not exceed seven days of well testing
Shell shall provide seven days notice of flaring with well testing, and 72 hours notice during maintenance
Location
07-19-021-04W5
Less detail

Decision 99-26

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3112
Applicant
Startech Energy Inc.
Application Number
1027549
Title
Decision 99-26: Startech Energy Inc. application to drill a noncritical level-1 sour gas well, Turner Valley field
Date
1999
Title
Decision 99-26: Startech Energy Inc. application to drill a noncritical level-1 sour gas well, Turner Valley field
Date
1999
Applicant
Startech Energy Inc.
Application Number
1027549
Hearing Panel
Dilay JD
McGee TM
Waisman DD
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Environment/Pollution
Descriptors
Airborne waste
Drilling (well)
Government hearing
NTS 82J
Site survey
Sour gas
Turner Valley Fm
Well licence
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
EUB Decision D99-26 on application no. 1027549 re Startech Energy's application to drill a noncritical sour gas well accessing the Turner Valley Formation from a bottomhole location of Lsd 7, Sec 5, Twp 21, Rg 3, W5M.
Board hearing 1999-04-13/16
Interveners
Whiskey Hills Owners Alliance (WHOA)
Greenwood R
Worthington N
Jacobsen H
Nelson D
Heffring M
Mason M
Johnson K
Gibson T
Gecko Management Consultants
Clissold R
Leahey DM
Soules C
Dudley W
Kerluke J
Kerluke S
Steen P
Knott L
Seaborn J
Hoyle J
Hoyle C
Lambert T
Approval
Approved
Location
07-05-021-03W5
Less detail

58 records – page 1 of 3.