Narrow Results By
Applicant
- Alberta. Dept. of the Environment 1
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited 1
- Andex Oil Co. Limited 1
- Canadian 88 Energy Corp. 1
- Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd. 1
- Canadian Superior Oil Ltd. 1
- Citadel Resources Ltd. 1
- Concord Scientific Corporation 1
- Consolidated Pipe Lines Company. 1
- Dome Petroleum Limited 4
- Dow Chemical Canada Inc. 1
- ESSO Resources Canada Limited 2
Decision 72-08
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2215
- Applicant
- Canadian Superior Oil Ltd.
- Application Number
- 6188
- Title
- Decision on application by Canadian Superior Oil Ltd., 1972 (exemption from sulphur recovery guidelines Harmattan Leduc gas processing plant)
- Date
- 1972
- Title
- Decision on application by Canadian Superior Oil Ltd., 1972 (exemption from sulphur recovery guidelines Harmattan Leduc gas processing plant)
- Date
- 1972
- Applicant
- Canadian Superior Oil Ltd.
- Application Number
- 6188
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Harrop RL
- Strom NA
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Gas processing plant
- Sulphur recovery
- Emission
- Monitoring
- Pollution control
- Sulphur dioxide
- Notes
- Decision 72-8 on application No. 6188 to amend approval No. 1454 for exemption of Harmattan Leduc gas processing plant from sulphur recovery efficiency guidelines in IL 71-29; granted by approval 1454C.
- Interveners
- Chandler, L.
- Christensen, H.
- Braun, Mrs.
- Morgan, D.
- Stockburger, A.
- Ross, R.H.
- Wigley, W.
- Hosegood, Mr.
- Albanese, M.
- Chandler, Mr.
- Brinson, B.E.
- County of Mountain View No. 17
- Approval
- Approved
Decision 77-01
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2147
- Applicant
- General Crude Oil Company Northern
- Application Number
- 9414
- 9415
- 9840
- Title
- Decision on application by General Crude Oil Company Northern, 1977 (gas processing and pipeline construction Teepee Creek-Sexsmith areas)
- Date
- 1977
- Title
- Decision on application by General Crude Oil Company Northern, 1977 (gas processing and pipeline construction Teepee Creek-Sexsmith areas)
- Date
- 1977
- Applicant
- General Crude Oil Company Northern
- Application Number
- 9414
- 9415
- 9840
- Hearing Panel
- Webber HJ
- Bellows LA
- Strom NA
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Pipelines
- Descriptors
- Gas pipeline
- Gas processing plant
- Sour gas
- Teepee field
- Air quality
- Emergency procedure
- Environmental impact
- Gas flaring
- Monitoring
- NTS 83M
- Socio-economic effect
- Safety
- Sulphur dioxide
- Notes
- Decision 77-1 on application No. 9414, No. 9415 and No. 9840 to construct a sour gas plant in section 2-74-4 W6M and to construct secondary lines to transport sour gas from points in LSD 10-21-73-3 W6M and LSD 6-26-73-4 W6M to the plant site and to construct a secondary line to transport sour gas from a point in LSD 10-12-74-6 W6M to the plant site.
- Interveners
- Peace River Regional Planning
- County of Grande Prairie
- Smith, D.
- Hollingworth, N.
Decision 80-02
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2036
- Applicant
- ESSO Resources Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 790377
- Title
- Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1980 (enhanced recovery by carbon dioxide miscible flood Judy Creek Beaverhill Lake A pool)
- Date
- 1980
- Title
- Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1980 (enhanced recovery by carbon dioxide miscible flood Judy Creek Beaverhill Lake A pool)
- Date
- 1980
- Applicant
- ESSO Resources Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 790377
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Strom NA
- Bray JA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Enhanced recovery
- Descriptors
- Carbon dioxide flooding
- Enhanced recovery scheme
- Judy Creek field
- Miscible displacement
- Beaverhill Lake Fm
- Development drilling
- Economic analysis
- Monitoring
- NTS 83J
- Oil saturation
- Reservoir model
- Sweep efficiency
- Tertiary recovery
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
- Notes
- Decision 80-2 on application No. 790377 for approval of a CO2 miscible flood scheme to enhance recovery of oil from Judy Creek Beaverhill Lake A pool (TP.63-64, R.10-11, W5M).
- Interveners
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
- Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Decision 80-F
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2323
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 790161
- Title
- Standard for pipeline control-system capabilities in Alberta: recommendations
- Date
- 1980
- Title
- Standard for pipeline control-system capabilities in Alberta: recommendations
- Date
- 1980
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 790161
- Category
- Pipelines
- Descriptors
- Leak detector
- Mill Woods area
- Pipeline leak
- Pipeline safety
- Piping system
- Safety equipment
- Standard
- Urban development
- Control equipment
- Monitoring
- NTS 83H
- Recommendation
- Safety
- Notes
- ERCB report 80-F arising from recommendations made in the report on Millwoods pipeline failure inquiry (proceeding No. 790161) CA2AL ER 3 D23/ No. 1979-07-31
Decision 81-02
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2006
- Applicant
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 790732
- Title
- Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1981 (Enhanced recovery by ethane enriched miscible flood - Caroline Viking A pool)
- Date
- 1981
- Title
- Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1981 (Enhanced recovery by ethane enriched miscible flood - Caroline Viking A pool)
- Date
- 1981
- Applicant
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 790732
- Hearing Panel
- Bray JA
- Keushnig HR
- Stafford GH
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Enhanced recovery
- Descriptors
- Caroline field
- Enhanced recovery scheme
- Miscible displacement
- Depletion
- Design criteria
- Gas saturation
- Injection pressure
- Monitoring
- NTS 82O
- NTS 83B
- Oil recovery
- Reservoir characteristic
- Reservoir performance
- Sweep efficiency
- Viking Fm
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
- Notes
- Decision 81-2 (with unnumbered Examiners report attached) on application No. 790732 for an ethane enriched miscible gas flood scheme in a portion of the Caroline Viking A pool (TP.33-36, R. 3-7, W5M).
- Interveners
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
- Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
- Wintershall Oil of Canada Ltd.
Decision 81-09
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1758
- Applicant
- Panther Resources Ltd.
- Application Number
- 800651
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Panther Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas processing plant)
- Date
- 1981
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Panther Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas processing plant)
- Date
- 1981
- Applicant
- Panther Resources Ltd.
- Application Number
- 800651
- Hearing Panel
- Evans RG
- Pearson DG
- Remmer WG
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Duhamel field
- Gas processing plant
- Sour gas
- Acidification
- Air quality
- Economic analysis
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Flare
- Hydrogen sulphide removal
- Livestock
- Locating
- Monitoring
- NTS 83A
- Sulphur dioxide
- Sulphur recovery
- Water quality
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
- Notes
- ERCB Examiners report No. E81-9 on application No. 800651 to construct and operate a sour gas processing plant southwest of Camrose in LSD 5-31-45-20 W4M; Examiners' hearing 81-01-15 adjourned to 81-03-17/18/19
- Interveners
- City of Camrose
- County of Camrose No.22
- Cordes, K.
- Calvin, G.
- Noden, D.
- Luz, W.
- Klapstein, W.
- Sauer, J.
- Sauer, K.
- Weyhausen, H.
- Weyga Farming Ltd.
- Watterodt, T.
- Watterodt, W.
- Watterodt, M.
- Schroeder, D.
- Schroeder, K.
- Schroeder, P.
- Schroeder, H.
- Graefin Von Helldorf, V.
- Schroeser, I.
- Baumgarten, E.
- Braim, B.
- Krangnes, D.
- Snider, R.
- Tate, R.
Decision 81-12
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1996
- Applicant
- Phillips Petroleum Company Western Hemisphere
- Application Number
- 801022
- Title
- Decision on application by Phillips Petroleum Company Western Hemisphere, 1981 (gas processing plant - Morley-Ghost River area)
- Date
- 1981
- Title
- Decision on application by Phillips Petroleum Company Western Hemisphere, 1981 (gas processing plant - Morley-Ghost River area)
- Date
- 1981
- Application Number
- 801022
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Strom NA
- Weaver Dr. RS
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Gas processing plant
- Indians of North America
- Morley field
- Salter field
- Sour gas
- Air quality
- Capacity
- Desulphurization
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Flare
- Hydrogen sulphide removal
- Jurisdiction
- Land use
- Locating
- Monitoring
- NTS 82O
- Plant location
- Safety
- Site survey
- Sulphur dioxide
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
- Notes
- Decision 81-12 on application No. 801022 to process sour gas in one of 3 possible sites in TP.26, R.7-8, W5M; Board hearing 1981-04-22/24/27
- Interveners
- Stoney Band of Indians
- Council of the Summer Village of Ghost Lake
- Ghost Valley Protection Committee
- Wasson, W.A.
- Alberta Outfitters Association
- The 6th Calgary Boy Scouts Group Committee
- Kings' Fold Foundation
- David H. McDougall Ranch
- Wolf, R.E.
- Calgary Regional Planning Commission
- Improvement District No. 8
Decision 82-03
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2075
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Resources Limited
- Application Number
- 810092
- Title
- Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1982 (Jumping Pound gas processing plant)
- Date
- 1982
- Title
- Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1982 (Jumping Pound gas processing plant)
- Date
- 1982
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Resources Limited
- Application Number
- 810092
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- Strom NA
- Evans RG
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Ethane
- Gas processing plant
- Jumping Pound field
- Scot desulphurization
- Sour gas
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- IL-80-24
- Expansion
- Flare
- Injection
- Liquefied natural gas
- Monitoring
- NTS 82O
- Pollution control
- Safety
- Sulphur dioxide
- Sulphur recovery
- Underground
- Waste disposal
- Legal References
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S2
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S4
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Notes
- Decision 82-3 on application No. 810092 to add a deep-cut unit for hydrocarbon liquids extraction and to modernize sulphur recovery facilities at Jumping Pound gas processing plant (TP.25, R.5, W5M); Board hearing 1981-10-05/06/07/08/09 and 1981-11-02/03/04/05/23/27; see related Decisions D82-12, Decision report 82-E, and for local interveners cost awards Decision D83-8; see also related report 82-D
- Interveners
- Esso Resources Canada Limited
- Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
- Hanen, Z.
- Rumsey Ranches
- Russell, A.
- Canadian Wildlife Federation
- Wolf, R.E.
Decision 82-05
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2073
- Applicant
- Dow Chemical Canada Inc.
- Application Number
- 810042
- 810043
- Title
- Decision on application by Dow Chemical Canada Inc., 1982 (Chlorine and caustic soda plant expansion and ethylene dichloride and vinyl chloride monomer plant expansion)
- Date
- 1982
- Title
- Decision on application by Dow Chemical Canada Inc., 1982 (Chlorine and caustic soda plant expansion and ethylene dichloride and vinyl chloride monomer plant expansion)
- Date
- 1982
- Applicant
- Dow Chemical Canada Inc.
- Application Number
- 810042
- 810043
- Hearing Panel
- Berkowitz N
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Chemical plant
- Chlorine
- Chloroethylene
- Dichloroethane
- Ethylene
- Fort Saskatchewan area
- Industrial development permit
- Sodium hydroxide
- Capitalized cost
- Cost analysis
- Demand (economics)
- Economic analysis
- Environmental impact
- Expansion
- Marketing
- Monitoring
- Natural gas - fuel
- Natural gas - raw material
- NTS 83H
- Revision
- Supply (economics)
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S30
- Notes
- Decision 82-5 on application No. 810042 to amend IDP No. DCC 80-7 for use of additional natural gas as fuel for production of chlorine and caustic soda and No. 810043 for use of ethylene and natural gas as raw material and fuel for production of ethylene facilities to be installed at Dow's existing plane at Fort Saskatchewan (located in sections 2 & 11-55-22 W4M.
- Interveners
- Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
- Esso Chemical Canada
- The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Decision 82-12
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2066
- Applicant
- ESSO Resources Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 810520
- Title
- Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1982 (Quirk Creek gas processing plant)
- Date
- 1982
- Title
- Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1982 (Quirk Creek gas processing plant)
- Date
- 1982
- Applicant
- ESSO Resources Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 810520
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- Strom NA
- Evans RG
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Gas processing plant
- Moose field
- Quirk Creek plant
- Sour gas
- Whiskey field
- Air pollution
- Air quality
- Emergency procedure
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- ID-80-02
- IL-71-29
- IL-80-24
- Expansion
- Hydrogen sulphide
- Injection
- Monitoring
- NTS 82J
- Pollution control
- Procedure
- Sulphur dioxide
- Sulphur recovery
- Underground
- Waste disposal
- Water pollution
- Legal References
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S2
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S4
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Notes
- Decision 82-12 on application No. 810520 to utilize spare plant capacity to process sour gas reserves from Moose and Whiskey fields at the Quirk Creek gas plant located in the south half of section 4-21-4 W5M; Board hearing 1981-11-04/05/06/23/24/25/26 and 1981-12-14/15/16/17/18 and 1982-01-05/06; see also related Decision D82-3 on Jumping Pound gas plant and ERCB report 82-E for Decisions on related pipeline applications by Shell and Decision D83-8 for local interveners cost awards; see also related report 82-D
- Interveners
- Shell Canada Resources Limited
- Hanen, Z.
- Rumsey Ranches
- Russell, A.
- Canadian Wildlife Federation
- Wolf, R.E.
Decision 82-38
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2041
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Resources Limited
- Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
- Application Number
- 810543
- 810606
- 810376
- 810377
- Title
- Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited and Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (gas plant approval amendments and pipeline permits Pincher Creek area)
- Date
- 1982
- Title
- Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited and Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (gas plant approval amendments and pipeline permits Pincher Creek area)
- Date
- 1982
- Application Number
- 810543
- 810606
- 810376
- 810377
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Pipelines
- Descriptors
- Gas pipeline
- Gas processing plant
- Lookout Butte field
- Pincher Creek field
- Pincher Creek gas plant
- Pipeline construction permit
- Sour gas
- Waterton area
- Waterton gas plant
- Abandonment
- Economic analysis
- Emergency procedure
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- ID-81-03
- Gas conservation
- Land reclamation
- Land use
- Monitoring
- NTS 82H
- Pipeline design
- Safety
- Shutdown
- Site survey
- Sulphur dioxide
- Sulphur recovery
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Pipeline Act
- Notes
- Decision D82-38 on application No. 810543 by Gulf to shut down its Pincher Creek gas plant, No. 810606 by Shell to allow its Waterton plant to process Pincher Creek and Lookout Butte gas and No. 810376 and 810377 by Gulf for pipelines from Pincher Creek plant to Waterton plant (all in TP.4, R.29-30, W4M).
- Interveners
- Oldman River Regional Planning Commission
- Municipal District of Pincher Creek No. 9
- Town of Pincher Creek
- Pincher Creek Economic Development Committee
- Hedenstrom, J.
Decision 82-D
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2313
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 810520
- 810092
- Title
- Sour gas processing in Alberta : a review of evidence presented at recent ERCB hearings respecting the impacts and surveillance of sour gas plants
- Date
- 1982
- Title
- Sour gas processing in Alberta : a review of evidence presented at recent ERCB hearings respecting the impacts and surveillance of sour gas plants
- Date
- 1982
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 810520
- 810092
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Air pollution
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Gas processing
- Nitrogen oxide
- Soil pollution
- Sour gas
- Sulphur
- Sulphur dioxide
- Sulphur dioxide removal
- Sulphur recovery
- Water pollution
- Acidification
- Airborne waste
- Alberta
- Deposition
- Exhaust gas
- Health
- Hydrogen sulphide
- Injection
- Livestock
- Monitoring
- Selenium
- Trace element
- Underground
- Waste disposal
- Notes
- ERCB report 82-D arising from hearing to consider application for sour gas processing at Jumping Pound and Quirk Creek gas plants and pipeline to connect Moose and Whiskey sour gas reserves to Quirk Creek plant. for Decisions on these applications see ERCB Decisions 82-3, 82-12 and report 82-E
Decision 83-04
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1201
- Applicant
- Citadel Resources Ltd.
- Scion Petroleum Engineering Limited
- Application Number
- 820763
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Citadel Resources Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing plant Sundre area)
- Date
- 1983
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Citadel Resources Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing plant Sundre area)
- Date
- 1983
- Application Number
- 820763
- Hearing Panel
- Homeniuk TF
- Mazurek LA
- Nichol JR
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Gas processing plant
- Sour gas
- Sundre area
- Air pollution
- Air quality
- Design criteria
- Emergency procedure
- Emission
- Health
- Locating
- Monitoring
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 82O
- Plant location
- Safety
- Sulphur dioxide
- Truck
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Notes
- Examiners report E83-4 on application No. 820763 by Scion Petroleum & Gildex Ltd. on behalf of Citadel for approval to construct a sour gas processing plant in LSD 13-20-33-5 W5M; Examiners hearing 1982-10-27 adjourned to 1982-11-25
- Interveners
- Residents in the County of Mountainview
- Alberda, R.
Decision 83-20
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1185
- Applicant
- Consolidated Pipe Lines Company.
- Application Number
- 830141
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Consolidated Pipe Lines Company, 1983 (gas processing plant Claresholm field)
- Date
- 1983
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Consolidated Pipe Lines Company, 1983 (gas processing plant Claresholm field)
- Date
- 1983
- Applicant
- Consolidated Pipe Lines Company.
- Application Number
- 830141
- Hearing Panel
- Morin EJ
- Brushett ER
- Fox EG
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Claresholm field
- Gas processing plant
- Sour gas
- Air quality
- Community relations
- Disposal well
- Dissolved gas
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Flare
- Gas conservation
- Health
- Hydrogen sulphide
- Monitoring
- NTS 82I
- Sulphur dioxide
- Sulphur recovery
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Notes
- ERCB Examiners report E83-20 on application No. 830141 to construct and operate a sour gas processing plant at an existing well located in LSD 6-30-12-25 W4M; Examiners hearing 1983-09-06, 1983-10-12/13
- Interveners
- Drummond Oil & Gas Ltd.
- Town of Claresholm
- Oldman River Regional Planning Commission
- East Claresholm Clean Air Association
- Willow Creek Surface Rights Society
- M.G. Mulholland Farms Ltd.
- Berg, V.
- Berg, D.
- Darch, O.
- Darch, D.
- Deering, V.
- Everl, D.
- Eberl, F.
- Finley, D.
- Kruszewski, D.
- Kruszewski, S.
- Laing, A.
- Laing, G.
- Opp, F.
- Opp, D.
- Prusky, M.
- Roemmele Farms Ltd.
- Ulrich, H.
- Weerstra, M.
Decision 83-21
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1184
- Applicant
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 830371
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1983 (experimental scheme for enhanced oil recovery by Alkaline solution injection Viking Kinsella Wainwright B pool)
- Date
- 1983
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1983 (experimental scheme for enhanced oil recovery by Alkaline solution injection Viking Kinsella Wainwright B pool)
- Date
- 1983
- Applicant
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Application Number
- 830371
- Hearing Panel
- Bellows LA
- Stafford GH
- Sharp KG
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Enhanced recovery
- Descriptors
- Caustic waterflooding
- Enhanced recovery scheme
- Viking Kinsella field
- Viscous oil recovery
- Contamination
- Environmental impact
- Groundwater
- Injection pressure
- Injection well
- Monitoring
- NTS 73E
- Pilot scale
- Wainwright Fm
- Water supply
- Water use
- Water well
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Notes
- ERCB Examiners report E83-21 on application No. 830371 for approval of an experimental scheme for enhanced oil recovery by alkaline solution injection in part of the Viking-Kinsella Wainwright B pool in section 17-48-8 W4M; Examiners hearing 1983-10-18/19
- Interveners
- Buffalo Creek Water Resources Environmental Association
- Nydokus, M.
- Nydokus, R.R.
Decision 83-24
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2273
- Applicant
- Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
- Application Number
- 830222
- Title
- Decision on application by Texaco Canada Resources Ltd., 1983 (for tertiary miscible scheme Wizard Lake D-3A pool)
- Date
- 1983
- Title
- Decision on application by Texaco Canada Resources Ltd., 1983 (for tertiary miscible scheme Wizard Lake D-3A pool)
- Date
- 1983
- Applicant
- Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
- Application Number
- 830222
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Strom NA
- Goodman CJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Enhanced recovery
- Descriptors
- Enhanced recovery scheme
- Miscible displacement
- Tertiary recovery
- Wizard Lake field
- Monitoring
- NTS 83H
- Oil recovery
- Oil reserve
- Oil saturation
- Recovery factor
- Reservoir characteristic
- Reservoir performance
- Reservoir pressure
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Notes
- Decision D83-24 on application No. 830222 for approval to extend vertical hydrocarbon miscible flood into waterflushed zone of the Wizard Lake D-3A pool (TP.48, R27,W4M).
- Interveners
- Chevron Canada Resources Limited
- Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Decision 83-26
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2271
- Applicant
- Home Oil Company Limited
- Application Number
- 830674
- Title
- Decision on application by Home Oil Company Limited, 1983 (hydrocarbon miscible flooe, Swan Hills Beaverhill Lake A&B pool unit no. 1)
- Date
- 1983
- Title
- Decision on application by Home Oil Company Limited, 1983 (hydrocarbon miscible flooe, Swan Hills Beaverhill Lake A&B pool unit no. 1)
- Date
- 1983
- Applicant
- Home Oil Company Limited
- Application Number
- 830674
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Strom NA
- Mink FJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Enhanced recovery
- Descriptors
- Enhanced recovery scheme
- Miscible displacement
- Swan Hills field
- Beaverhill Lake Fm
- Design criteria
- Development well
- Economic analysis
- Injection well
- Monitoring
- NTS 83J
- Oil recovery
- Oil saturation
- Recovery factor
- Reservoir model
- Sweep efficiency
- Unitized field
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Notes
- Decision D83-26 on application No. 830674 to implement a hydrocarbon miscible flood in the Swan Hills Beaverhill Lake A&B pool unit No. 1 (TP.66-68, R.9-11, W5M).
- Interveners
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
- Esso Resources Canada Limited
- Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
- Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Decision 83-29
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2274
- Applicant
- Petro-Canada
- Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
- Application Number
- 830567
- 830883
- 830836
- 830873
- 831088
- 830874
- 831086
- 830875
- 831087
- Title
- Decision on application by Petro-Canada, 1983 (gas cycling schemes, sour gas pipelines, injection pipelines, fuel gas pipelines, Brazeau River-west Pembina area); Decision on application by Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, 1983 (gas cycling schemes, sour gas pipelines, injection pipelines, fuel gas pipelines, Brazeau River-west Pembina area)
- Date
- 1983
- Title
- Decision on application by Petro-Canada, 1983 (gas cycling schemes, sour gas pipelines, injection pipelines, fuel gas pipelines, Brazeau River-west Pembina area); Decision on application by Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, 1983 (gas cycling schemes, sour gas pipelines, injection pipelines, fuel gas pipelines, Brazeau River-west Pembina area)
- Date
- 1983
- Application Number
- 830567
- 830883
- 830836
- 830873
- 831088
- 830874
- 831086
- 830875
- 831087
- Hearing Panel
- Bohme VE
- Goodman CJ
- Bray JA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Pipelines
- Descriptors
- Brazeau River field
- Fuel gas pipeline
- Gas cycling
- Gas injection
- Gas pipeline
- Pipeline construction permit
- Sour gas
- Depletion
- Energy development
- Environmental impact
- Gas condensate recovery
- Monitoring
- NTS 83G
- Pipeline route
- Planning
- Reservoir characteristic
- Reservoir pressure
- Route selection
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
- Pipeline Act
- Notes
- Decision D83-29 on application numbers 830567, 830883, 830836, 830873, 831088, 830874, 831086, 830875, 831087 by Petro-Canada and Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas for gas cycling schemes, sour gas pipelines, injection pipelines and fuel gas pipelines in the Brazeau River-west Pembine area (TP.47-48, R.12-14, W5M).
- Interveners
- Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
- Amoco Canada Petroleum Ltd.
Decision 84-20
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1156
- Applicant
- Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
- Application Number
- 830725
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Texaco Canada Resources Ltd., 1984 (Open Creek gas processing plant)
- Date
- 1984
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Texaco Canada Resources Ltd., 1984 (Open Creek gas processing plant)
- Date
- 1984
- Applicant
- Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
- Application Number
- 830725
- Hearing Panel
- Webber HJ
- Bray JA
- Homeniuk TF
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Gas processing
- Descriptors
- Gas processing plant
- Open Creek field
- Sour gas
- Acidification
- Air quality
- Atmospheric diffusion
- Basal Quartz Fm
- Deposition
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Gas producing
- Health
- Hydrogen sulphide
- Mathematical model
- Monitoring
- NTS 83B
- Revision
- Soil analysis
- Selenium
- Sulphur content
- Sulphur dioxide
- Notes
- ERCB Examiners report E84-20 on application No. 830725 for approval to amend approval 3079 to increase the sulphur inlet rate to the open Creek gas plant located in LSD 10-34-42-5 W4M.
- Interveners
- Gibson, H.
- Bauer, J.
- Bauer, L.
- Bryanton, W.
- Eklund, C.
- Eklund, P.
Decision 84-24 Adendum
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1691
- Applicant
- Syncrude Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 840142
- Title
- Decision on application by Syncrude Canada Ltd., 1984 (new facilities at the Syncrude Mildred Lake oil sands plant SO2 emissions)
- Date
- 1984
- Title
- Decision on application by Syncrude Canada Ltd., 1984 (new facilities at the Syncrude Mildred Lake oil sands plant SO2 emissions)
- Date
- 1984
- Applicant
- Syncrude Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 840142
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- Bohme VE
- Strom NA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Mildred Lake project
- Oil sands project
- Air quality
- Desulphurization
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Expansion
- Monitoring
- Sulphur dioxide
- Sulphur recovery
- Legal References
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S14
- Notes
- Decision D84-24 addendum on application No. 840142 for expansion to Syncrude Mildred Lake oil sands plant relating to SO2 emission limits; amendment to approval 2959F