42 records – page 1 of 3.

Decision 72-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2215
Applicant
Canadian Superior Oil Ltd.
Application Number
6188
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Superior Oil Ltd., 1972 (exemption from sulphur recovery guidelines Harmattan Leduc gas processing plant)
Date
1972
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Superior Oil Ltd., 1972 (exemption from sulphur recovery guidelines Harmattan Leduc gas processing plant)
Date
1972
Applicant
Canadian Superior Oil Ltd.
Application Number
6188
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Harrop RL
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Sulphur recovery
Emission
Monitoring
Pollution control
Sulphur dioxide
Notes
Decision 72-8 on application No. 6188 to amend approval No. 1454 for exemption of Harmattan Leduc gas processing plant from sulphur recovery efficiency guidelines in IL 71-29; granted by approval 1454C.
Interveners
Chandler, L.
Christensen, H.
Braun, Mrs.
Morgan, D.
Stockburger, A.
Ross, R.H.
Wigley, W.
Hosegood, Mr.
Albanese, M.
Chandler, Mr.
Brinson, B.E.
County of Mountain View No. 17
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision 77-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2147
Applicant
General Crude Oil Company Northern
Application Number
9414
9415
9840
Title
Decision on application by General Crude Oil Company Northern, 1977 (gas processing and pipeline construction Teepee Creek-Sexsmith areas)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by General Crude Oil Company Northern, 1977 (gas processing and pipeline construction Teepee Creek-Sexsmith areas)
Date
1977
Applicant
General Crude Oil Company Northern
Application Number
9414
9415
9840
Hearing Panel
Webber HJ
Bellows LA
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Teepee field
Air quality
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Gas flaring
Monitoring
NTS 83M
Socio-economic effect
Safety
Sulphur dioxide
Notes
Decision 77-1 on application No. 9414, No. 9415 and No. 9840 to construct a sour gas plant in section 2-74-4 W6M and to construct secondary lines to transport sour gas from points in LSD 10-21-73-3 W6M and LSD 6-26-73-4 W6M to the plant site and to construct a secondary line to transport sour gas from a point in LSD 10-12-74-6 W6M to the plant site.
Interveners
Peace River Regional Planning
County of Grande Prairie
Smith, D.
Hollingworth, N.
Less detail

Decision 80-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2036
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
790377
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1980 (enhanced recovery by carbon dioxide miscible flood Judy Creek Beaverhill Lake A pool)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1980 (enhanced recovery by carbon dioxide miscible flood Judy Creek Beaverhill Lake A pool)
Date
1980
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
790377
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Bray JA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Carbon dioxide flooding
Enhanced recovery scheme
Judy Creek field
Miscible displacement
Beaverhill Lake Fm
Development drilling
Economic analysis
Monitoring
NTS 83J
Oil saturation
Reservoir model
Sweep efficiency
Tertiary recovery
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
Decision 80-2 on application No. 790377 for approval of a CO2 miscible flood scheme to enhance recovery of oil from Judy Creek Beaverhill Lake A pool (TP.63-64, R.10-11, W5M).
Interveners
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Less detail

Decision 80-F

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2323
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
790161
Title
Standard for pipeline control-system capabilities in Alberta: recommendations
Date
1980
Title
Standard for pipeline control-system capabilities in Alberta: recommendations
Date
1980
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
790161
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Leak detector
Mill Woods area
Pipeline leak
Pipeline safety
Piping system
Safety equipment
Standard
Urban development
Control equipment
Monitoring
NTS 83H
Recommendation
Safety
Notes
ERCB report 80-F arising from recommendations made in the report on Millwoods pipeline failure inquiry (proceeding No. 790161) CA2AL ER 3 D23/ No. 1979-07-31
Less detail

Decision 81-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2006
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
790732
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1981 (Enhanced recovery by ethane enriched miscible flood - Caroline Viking A pool)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1981 (Enhanced recovery by ethane enriched miscible flood - Caroline Viking A pool)
Date
1981
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
790732
Hearing Panel
Bray JA
Keushnig HR
Stafford GH
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Caroline field
Enhanced recovery scheme
Miscible displacement
Depletion
Design criteria
Gas saturation
Injection pressure
Monitoring
NTS 82O
NTS 83B
Oil recovery
Reservoir characteristic
Reservoir performance
Sweep efficiency
Viking Fm
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
Decision 81-2 (with unnumbered Examiners report attached) on application No. 790732 for an ethane enriched miscible gas flood scheme in a portion of the Caroline Viking A pool (TP.33-36, R. 3-7, W5M).
Interveners
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Wintershall Oil of Canada Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 81-09

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1758
Applicant
Panther Resources Ltd.
Application Number
800651
Title
Examiners report on application by Panther Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas processing plant)
Date
1981
Title
Examiners report on application by Panther Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas processing plant)
Date
1981
Applicant
Panther Resources Ltd.
Application Number
800651
Hearing Panel
Evans RG
Pearson DG
Remmer WG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Duhamel field
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Acidification
Air quality
Economic analysis
Emission
Environmental impact
Flare
Hydrogen sulphide removal
Livestock
Locating
Monitoring
NTS 83A
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
ERCB Examiners report No. E81-9 on application No. 800651 to construct and operate a sour gas processing plant southwest of Camrose in LSD 5-31-45-20 W4M; Examiners' hearing 81-01-15 adjourned to 81-03-17/18/19
Interveners
City of Camrose
County of Camrose No.22
Cordes, K.
Calvin, G.
Noden, D.
Luz, W.
Klapstein, W.
Sauer, J.
Sauer, K.
Weyhausen, H.
Weyga Farming Ltd.
Watterodt, T.
Watterodt, W.
Watterodt, M.
Schroeder, D.
Schroeder, K.
Schroeder, P.
Schroeder, H.
Graefin Von Helldorf, V.
Schroeser, I.
Baumgarten, E.
Braim, B.
Krangnes, D.
Snider, R.
Tate, R.
Less detail

Decision 81-12

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1996
Applicant
Phillips Petroleum Company Western Hemisphere
Application Number
801022
Title
Decision on application by Phillips Petroleum Company Western Hemisphere, 1981 (gas processing plant - Morley-Ghost River area)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Phillips Petroleum Company Western Hemisphere, 1981 (gas processing plant - Morley-Ghost River area)
Date
1981
Applicant
Phillips Petroleum Company Western Hemisphere
Application Number
801022
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Weaver Dr. RS
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Indians of North America
Morley field
Salter field
Sour gas
Air quality
Capacity
Desulphurization
Emission
Environmental impact
Flare
Hydrogen sulphide removal
Jurisdiction
Land use
Locating
Monitoring
NTS 82O
Plant location
Safety
Site survey
Sulphur dioxide
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
Decision 81-12 on application No. 801022 to process sour gas in one of 3 possible sites in TP.26, R.7-8, W5M; Board hearing 1981-04-22/24/27
Interveners
Stoney Band of Indians
Council of the Summer Village of Ghost Lake
Ghost Valley Protection Committee
Wasson, W.A.
Alberta Outfitters Association
The 6th Calgary Boy Scouts Group Committee
Kings' Fold Foundation
David H. McDougall Ranch
Wolf, R.E.
Calgary Regional Planning Commission
Improvement District No. 8
Less detail

Decision 82-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2075
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
810092
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1982 (Jumping Pound gas processing plant)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1982 (Jumping Pound gas processing plant)
Date
1982
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
810092
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Strom NA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Ethane
Gas processing plant
Jumping Pound field
Scot desulphurization
Sour gas
Emission
Environmental impact
IL-80-24
Expansion
Flare
Injection
Liquefied natural gas
Monitoring
NTS 82O
Pollution control
Safety
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Underground
Waste disposal
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S2
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S4
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision 82-3 on application No. 810092 to add a deep-cut unit for hydrocarbon liquids extraction and to modernize sulphur recovery facilities at Jumping Pound gas processing plant (TP.25, R.5, W5M); Board hearing 1981-10-05/06/07/08/09 and 1981-11-02/03/04/05/23/27; see related Decisions D82-12, Decision report 82-E, and for local interveners cost awards Decision D83-8; see also related report 82-D
Interveners
Esso Resources Canada Limited
Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
Hanen, Z.
Rumsey Ranches
Russell, A.
Canadian Wildlife Federation
Wolf, R.E.
Less detail

Decision 82-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2073
Applicant
Dow Chemical Canada Inc.
Application Number
810042
810043
Title
Decision on application by Dow Chemical Canada Inc., 1982 (Chlorine and caustic soda plant expansion and ethylene dichloride and vinyl chloride monomer plant expansion)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Dow Chemical Canada Inc., 1982 (Chlorine and caustic soda plant expansion and ethylene dichloride and vinyl chloride monomer plant expansion)
Date
1982
Applicant
Dow Chemical Canada Inc.
Application Number
810042
810043
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Chlorine
Chloroethylene
Dichloroethane
Ethylene
Fort Saskatchewan area
Industrial development permit
Sodium hydroxide
Capitalized cost
Cost analysis
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Expansion
Marketing
Monitoring
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 83H
Revision
Supply (economics)
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S30
Notes
Decision 82-5 on application No. 810042 to amend IDP No. DCC 80-7 for use of additional natural gas as fuel for production of chlorine and caustic soda and No. 810043 for use of ethylene and natural gas as raw material and fuel for production of ethylene facilities to be installed at Dow's existing plane at Fort Saskatchewan (located in sections 2 & 11-55-22 W4M.
Interveners
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Esso Chemical Canada
The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 82-12

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2066
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
810520
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1982 (Quirk Creek gas processing plant)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1982 (Quirk Creek gas processing plant)
Date
1982
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
810520
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Strom NA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Moose field
Quirk Creek plant
Sour gas
Whiskey field
Air pollution
Air quality
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
ID-80-02
IL-71-29
IL-80-24
Expansion
Hydrogen sulphide
Injection
Monitoring
NTS 82J
Pollution control
Procedure
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Underground
Waste disposal
Water pollution
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S2
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S4
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision 82-12 on application No. 810520 to utilize spare plant capacity to process sour gas reserves from Moose and Whiskey fields at the Quirk Creek gas plant located in the south half of section 4-21-4 W5M; Board hearing 1981-11-04/05/06/23/24/25/26 and 1981-12-14/15/16/17/18 and 1982-01-05/06; see also related Decision D82-3 on Jumping Pound gas plant and ERCB report 82-E for Decisions on related pipeline applications by Shell and Decision D83-8 for local interveners cost awards; see also related report 82-D
Interveners
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Hanen, Z.
Rumsey Ranches
Russell, A.
Canadian Wildlife Federation
Wolf, R.E.
Less detail

Decision 82-38

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2041
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
810543
810606
810376
810377
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited and Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (gas plant approval amendments and pipeline permits Pincher Creek area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited and Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (gas plant approval amendments and pipeline permits Pincher Creek area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
810543
810606
810376
810377
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Gas processing plant
Lookout Butte field
Pincher Creek field
Pincher Creek gas plant
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Waterton area
Waterton gas plant
Abandonment
Economic analysis
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
ID-81-03
Gas conservation
Land reclamation
Land use
Monitoring
NTS 82H
Pipeline design
Safety
Shutdown
Site survey
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision D82-38 on application No. 810543 by Gulf to shut down its Pincher Creek gas plant, No. 810606 by Shell to allow its Waterton plant to process Pincher Creek and Lookout Butte gas and No. 810376 and 810377 by Gulf for pipelines from Pincher Creek plant to Waterton plant (all in TP.4, R.29-30, W4M).
Interveners
Oldman River Regional Planning Commission
Municipal District of Pincher Creek No. 9
Town of Pincher Creek
Pincher Creek Economic Development Committee
Hedenstrom, J.
Less detail

Decision 82-D

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2313
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
810520
810092
Title
Sour gas processing in Alberta : a review of evidence presented at recent ERCB hearings respecting the impacts and surveillance of sour gas plants
Date
1982
Title
Sour gas processing in Alberta : a review of evidence presented at recent ERCB hearings respecting the impacts and surveillance of sour gas plants
Date
1982
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
810520
810092
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Air pollution
Emission
Environmental impact
Gas processing
Nitrogen oxide
Soil pollution
Sour gas
Sulphur
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur dioxide removal
Sulphur recovery
Water pollution
Acidification
Airborne waste
Alberta
Deposition
Exhaust gas
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
Injection
Livestock
Monitoring
Selenium
Trace element
Underground
Waste disposal
Notes
ERCB report 82-D arising from hearing to consider application for sour gas processing at Jumping Pound and Quirk Creek gas plants and pipeline to connect Moose and Whiskey sour gas reserves to Quirk Creek plant. for Decisions on these applications see ERCB Decisions 82-3, 82-12 and report 82-E
Less detail

Decision 83-04

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1201
Applicant
Citadel Resources Ltd.
Scion Petroleum Engineering Limited
Application Number
820763
Title
Examiners report on application by Citadel Resources Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing plant Sundre area)
Date
1983
Title
Examiners report on application by Citadel Resources Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing plant Sundre area)
Date
1983
Applicant
Citadel Resources Ltd.
Scion Petroleum Engineering Limited
Application Number
820763
Hearing Panel
Homeniuk TF
Mazurek LA
Nichol JR
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Sundre area
Air pollution
Air quality
Design criteria
Emergency procedure
Emission
Health
Locating
Monitoring
Noise (sound)
NTS 82O
Plant location
Safety
Sulphur dioxide
Truck
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Examiners report E83-4 on application No. 820763 by Scion Petroleum & Gildex Ltd. on behalf of Citadel for approval to construct a sour gas processing plant in LSD 13-20-33-5 W5M; Examiners hearing 1982-10-27 adjourned to 1982-11-25
Interveners
Residents in the County of Mountainview
Alberda, R.
Less detail

Decision 83-20

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1185
Applicant
Consolidated Pipe Lines Company.
Application Number
830141
Title
Examiners report on application by Consolidated Pipe Lines Company, 1983 (gas processing plant Claresholm field)
Date
1983
Title
Examiners report on application by Consolidated Pipe Lines Company, 1983 (gas processing plant Claresholm field)
Date
1983
Applicant
Consolidated Pipe Lines Company.
Application Number
830141
Hearing Panel
Morin EJ
Brushett ER
Fox EG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Claresholm field
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Air quality
Community relations
Disposal well
Dissolved gas
Emission
Environmental impact
Flare
Gas conservation
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
Monitoring
NTS 82I
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E83-20 on application No. 830141 to construct and operate a sour gas processing plant at an existing well located in LSD 6-30-12-25 W4M; Examiners hearing 1983-09-06, 1983-10-12/13
Interveners
Drummond Oil & Gas Ltd.
Town of Claresholm
Oldman River Regional Planning Commission
East Claresholm Clean Air Association
Willow Creek Surface Rights Society
M.G. Mulholland Farms Ltd.
Berg, V.
Berg, D.
Darch, O.
Darch, D.
Deering, V.
Everl, D.
Eberl, F.
Finley, D.
Kruszewski, D.
Kruszewski, S.
Laing, A.
Laing, G.
Opp, F.
Opp, D.
Prusky, M.
Roemmele Farms Ltd.
Ulrich, H.
Weerstra, M.
Less detail

Decision 83-21

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1184
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
830371
Title
Examiners report on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1983 (experimental scheme for enhanced oil recovery by Alkaline solution injection Viking Kinsella Wainwright B pool)
Date
1983
Title
Examiners report on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1983 (experimental scheme for enhanced oil recovery by Alkaline solution injection Viking Kinsella Wainwright B pool)
Date
1983
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
830371
Hearing Panel
Bellows LA
Stafford GH
Sharp KG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Caustic waterflooding
Enhanced recovery scheme
Viking Kinsella field
Viscous oil recovery
Contamination
Environmental impact
Groundwater
Injection pressure
Injection well
Monitoring
NTS 73E
Pilot scale
Wainwright Fm
Water supply
Water use
Water well
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E83-21 on application No. 830371 for approval of an experimental scheme for enhanced oil recovery by alkaline solution injection in part of the Viking-Kinsella Wainwright B pool in section 17-48-8 W4M; Examiners hearing 1983-10-18/19
Interveners
Buffalo Creek Water Resources Environmental Association
Nydokus, M.
Nydokus, R.R.
Less detail

Decision 83-24

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2273
Applicant
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Application Number
830222
Title
Decision on application by Texaco Canada Resources Ltd., 1983 (for tertiary miscible scheme Wizard Lake D-3A pool)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Texaco Canada Resources Ltd., 1983 (for tertiary miscible scheme Wizard Lake D-3A pool)
Date
1983
Applicant
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Application Number
830222
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Enhanced recovery scheme
Miscible displacement
Tertiary recovery
Wizard Lake field
Monitoring
NTS 83H
Oil recovery
Oil reserve
Oil saturation
Recovery factor
Reservoir characteristic
Reservoir performance
Reservoir pressure
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision D83-24 on application No. 830222 for approval to extend vertical hydrocarbon miscible flood into waterflushed zone of the Wizard Lake D-3A pool (TP.48, R27,W4M).
Interveners
Chevron Canada Resources Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Less detail

Decision 83-26

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2271
Applicant
Home Oil Company Limited
Application Number
830674
Title
Decision on application by Home Oil Company Limited, 1983 (hydrocarbon miscible flooe, Swan Hills Beaverhill Lake A&B pool unit no. 1)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Home Oil Company Limited, 1983 (hydrocarbon miscible flooe, Swan Hills Beaverhill Lake A&B pool unit no. 1)
Date
1983
Applicant
Home Oil Company Limited
Application Number
830674
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Enhanced recovery scheme
Miscible displacement
Swan Hills field
Beaverhill Lake Fm
Design criteria
Development well
Economic analysis
Injection well
Monitoring
NTS 83J
Oil recovery
Oil saturation
Recovery factor
Reservoir model
Sweep efficiency
Unitized field
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision D83-26 on application No. 830674 to implement a hydrocarbon miscible flood in the Swan Hills Beaverhill Lake A&B pool unit No. 1 (TP.66-68, R.9-11, W5M).
Interveners
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Esso Resources Canada Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 83-29

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2274
Applicant
Petro-Canada
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Application Number
830567
830883
830836
830873
831088
830874
831086
830875
831087
Title
Decision on application by Petro-Canada, 1983 (gas cycling schemes, sour gas pipelines, injection pipelines, fuel gas pipelines, Brazeau River-west Pembina area); Decision on application by Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, 1983 (gas cycling schemes, sour gas pipelines, injection pipelines, fuel gas pipelines, Brazeau River-west Pembina area)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Petro-Canada, 1983 (gas cycling schemes, sour gas pipelines, injection pipelines, fuel gas pipelines, Brazeau River-west Pembina area); Decision on application by Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, 1983 (gas cycling schemes, sour gas pipelines, injection pipelines, fuel gas pipelines, Brazeau River-west Pembina area)
Date
1983
Applicant
Petro-Canada
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Application Number
830567
830883
830836
830873
831088
830874
831086
830875
831087
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Bray JA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Brazeau River field
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas cycling
Gas injection
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Depletion
Energy development
Environmental impact
Gas condensate recovery
Monitoring
NTS 83G
Pipeline route
Planning
Reservoir characteristic
Reservoir pressure
Route selection
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision D83-29 on application numbers 830567, 830883, 830836, 830873, 831088, 830874, 831086, 830875, 831087 by Petro-Canada and Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas for gas cycling schemes, sour gas pipelines, injection pipelines and fuel gas pipelines in the Brazeau River-west Pembine area (TP.47-48, R.12-14, W5M).
Interveners
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Amoco Canada Petroleum Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 84-20

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1156
Applicant
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Application Number
830725
Title
Examiners report on application by Texaco Canada Resources Ltd., 1984 (Open Creek gas processing plant)
Date
1984
Title
Examiners report on application by Texaco Canada Resources Ltd., 1984 (Open Creek gas processing plant)
Date
1984
Applicant
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Application Number
830725
Hearing Panel
Webber HJ
Bray JA
Homeniuk TF
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Open Creek field
Sour gas
Acidification
Air quality
Atmospheric diffusion
Basal Quartz Fm
Deposition
Emission
Environmental impact
Gas producing
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
Mathematical model
Monitoring
NTS 83B
Revision
Soil analysis
Selenium
Sulphur content
Sulphur dioxide
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E84-20 on application No. 830725 for approval to amend approval 3079 to increase the sulphur inlet rate to the open Creek gas plant located in LSD 10-34-42-5 W4M.
Interveners
Gibson, H.
Bauer, J.
Bauer, L.
Bryanton, W.
Eklund, C.
Eklund, P.
Less detail

Decision 84-24 Adendum

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1691
Applicant
Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Application Number
840142
Title
Decision on application by Syncrude Canada Ltd., 1984 (new facilities at the Syncrude Mildred Lake oil sands plant SO2 emissions)
Date
1984
Title
Decision on application by Syncrude Canada Ltd., 1984 (new facilities at the Syncrude Mildred Lake oil sands plant SO2 emissions)
Date
1984
Applicant
Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Application Number
840142
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Bohme VE
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Mildred Lake project
Oil sands project
Air quality
Desulphurization
Emission
Environmental impact
Expansion
Monitoring
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S14
Notes
Decision D84-24 addendum on application No. 840142 for expansion to Syncrude Mildred Lake oil sands plant relating to SO2 emission limits; amendment to approval 2959F
Less detail

42 records – page 1 of 3.