18 records – page 1 of 1.

Decision 80-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2036
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
790377
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1980 (enhanced recovery by carbon dioxide miscible flood Judy Creek Beaverhill Lake A pool)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1980 (enhanced recovery by carbon dioxide miscible flood Judy Creek Beaverhill Lake A pool)
Date
1980
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
790377
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Bray JA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Carbon dioxide flooding
Enhanced recovery scheme
Judy Creek field
Miscible displacement
Beaverhill Lake Fm
Development drilling
Economic analysis
Monitoring
NTS 83J
Oil saturation
Reservoir model
Sweep efficiency
Tertiary recovery
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
Decision 80-2 on application No. 790377 for approval of a CO2 miscible flood scheme to enhance recovery of oil from Judy Creek Beaverhill Lake A pool (TP.63-64, R.10-11, W5M).
Interveners
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Less detail

Decision 80-09

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2030
Applicant
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Application Number
790560
Title
Decision on application by Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, 1980 (commencement of blowdown in gas unit no. 1 Kaybob South Beaverhill Lake A pool)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, 1980 (commencement of blowdown in gas unit no. 1 Kaybob South Beaverhill Lake A pool)
Date
1980
Applicant
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Application Number
790560
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Bray JA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Blowdown
Descriptors
Blowdown
Kaybob South field
Beaverhill Lake Fm
Gas cycling
Gas producing
Gas saturation
NTS 83K
Oil producing
Oil recovery
Petroleum conservation
Pressure release
Reservoir model
Reservoir performance
Reservoir pressure
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S36
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S37
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
Decision 80-9 on application No. 790560 to amend Board approval 995 to permit cessation of injection of residue gas and commencement of blowdown in the Kaybob south Beaverhill Lake gas unit No. 1 (TP.61, R.19, W5M).
Interveners
Chevron Standard Limited
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Mobil Oil Canada, Ltd.
Petrofina Canada Inc.
Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd.
Consolidated Natural Gas Liimited
TransCanada PipeLines Limited
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Less detail

Decision 80-G

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2322
Applicant
Pan-Alberta Gas Ltd.
Application Number
800078
Title
Decision on application by Pan-Alberta Gas Ltd., 1980 (to amend gas removal permit)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Pan-Alberta Gas Ltd., 1980 (to amend gas removal permit)
Date
1980
Applicant
Pan-Alberta Gas Ltd.
Application Number
800078
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas removal
Descriptors
Gas removal
Computer model
Deliverability
ERCB 79-G
ERCB 79-I
Gas reserve
Surplus
Legal References
Gas Resources Preservation Act S10
Notes
ERCB report 80-G on application No. 800078 for amendment to gas removal permit PA 79-2 (for increase in total volume, in maximum annual volume and in maximum daily volume and to change the list of approved fields and pools from which gas can be removed); see also ERCB report 79-C for Decision on original application.
Less detail

Decision 81-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2003
Applicant
Chevron Standard Limited
Application Number
800163
Title
Decision on application by Chevron Standard Limited, 1981 (enhanced recovery Westpem Nisku A)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Chevron Standard Limited, 1981 (enhanced recovery Westpem Nisku A)
Date
1981
Applicant
Chevron Standard Limited
Application Number
800163
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Enhanced recovery scheme
Miscible displacement
Waterflooding
Westpem field
Coning
Economic analysis
IL-79-24
Nisku Fm
NTS 83G
Oil recovery
Petroleum conservation
Reservoir characteristic
Reservoir model
Sweep efficiency
Notes
Decision 81-5 on application No. 800163 for enhanced recovery scheme by water injection in the WestPem Nisku A pool (TP.50, R.12, W5M).
Interveners
Amoco Canada Petroleum Limited
Less detail

Decision 82-11

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1136
Applicant
Vanguard Petroleums Ltd.
Application Number
810827
Title
Examiners report on application by Vanguard Petroleums Ltd., 1982 (quarter section drilling spacing units Lanaway field Cardium formation)
Date
1982
Title
Examiners report on application by Vanguard Petroleums Ltd., 1982 (quarter section drilling spacing units Lanaway field Cardium formation)
Date
1982
Applicant
Vanguard Petroleums Ltd.
Application Number
810827
Hearing Panel
Pow JR
Purvis RA
Berndtsson NG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Spacing
Descriptors
Drilling spacing unit
Lanaway field
Cardium Fm
Depletion
NTS 83B
Oil producing
Oil recovery
Production rate
Reservoir model
Target area
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.030
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E82-11 on application No. 810827 to remove the west half of section 7-36-3 W5M from Order No. SU 405 which designates as one half section drilling spacing unit and establish quarter section drilling spacing units in the west half of section 7 with target areas being LSD 6 & 14 in accordance with Order No. SU 1088 for production of oil from the Cardium FM.
Interveners
C&T Resources Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 82-20

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2058
Applicant
Pembina Pipe Line Ltd.
Application Number
810982
Title
Decision on application by Pembina Pipe Line Ltd., 1982 (waterflood concurrent production approval review Medicine River Ostracod A pool)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Pembina Pipe Line Ltd., 1982 (waterflood concurrent production approval review Medicine River Ostracod A pool)
Date
1982
Applicant
Pembina Pipe Line Ltd.
Application Number
810982
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Pow JR
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Concurrent production
Enhanced recovery scheme
Medicine River field
Waterflooding
Depletion
IL-81-19
Gas cap
Gas producing
NTS 83B
Oil producing
Ostracod zone
Production rate
Reservoir model
Reservoir pressure
Unit operation
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision 82-20 on application No. 810982 for a scheme of enhanced oil recovery by water injection in part of the Medicine River Ostracod A pool and Board review of concurrent production as approved under Board Order No. Misc 7717 an its effect on the various modes of reservoir depletion (TP.39, R.2-3, W5M); Board hearing 1982-03-10/11 adjourned & reconvened 1982-04-19/20
Interveners
CDC Oil & Gas Limited
Chevron Standard Limited
Czar Resources Ltd.
Hudson's Bay Oil & Gas Company Limited
Sabine Canada Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 82-21

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2057
Applicant
Inverness Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
810434
820033
Title
Decision on application by Inverness Petroleum Ltd., 1982 (approval of a gas processing plant and related gas gathering facilities in the Silver Valley area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Inverness Petroleum Ltd., 1982 (approval of a gas processing plant and related gas gathering facilities in the Silver Valley area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Inverness Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
810434
820033
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Gas processing plant
Gathering line
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Agricultural land
Air quality
Deposition
Emission
Environment protection
Environmental impact
Flare
Health
Livestock
Mathematical model
NTS 84D
Safety
Selenium
Soil analysis
Sulphur dioxide
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 82-21 on application No. 810434 to construct a gas plant in LSD 13-27-81-11 W6M and on application No. 820033 for related gas gathering and pipeline facilities; Board hearing 1982-03-22/23
Interveners
Josephine Environmental Protection Group
Rehaume AB
Umbach JE
Scobel K
Baxter DM
Travis KR
Phillips BM
Weiss K
Brown HD
Harpe R
Nagel H
National Farmers Union
Staton ME
Hendricks J
Johnstone AH
Alberta Environment
Liu CS
Defir J
Graveland D
Less detail

Decision 83-18

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2282
Applicant
Chevron Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
820632
Title
Decision on application by Chevron Canada Resources Limited, 1983 (waterflood - Bigoray Cardium B pool)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Chevron Canada Resources Limited, 1983 (waterflood - Bigoray Cardium B pool)
Date
1983
Applicant
Chevron Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
820632
Hearing Panel
Strom NA
Bray JA
Bruni MJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Bigoray field
Enhanced recovery scheme
Waterflooding
Cardium Fm
Geologic interpretation
Injection pressure
NTS 83G
Oil recovery
Reservoir characteristic
Reservoir model
Reservoir pressure
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision D83-18 on application No. 820632 by Chevron Canada for approval of a scheme for enhanced recovery of oil by water injection in Bigoray Cardium B pool and amendment of Board approval 3283 to delete SW quarter of section 3-51-9-W5M and the north half and SE quarter of section 4-51-9 W5M.
Interveners
J.M. Huber Corporation
Less detail

Decision 83-19

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2295
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
830246
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1983 (hydrocarbon miscible flood, Judy Creek Beaverhill Lake A Pool)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1983 (hydrocarbon miscible flood, Judy Creek Beaverhill Lake A Pool)
Date
1983
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
830246
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Antonio HA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Enhanced recovery scheme
Judy Creek field
Miscible displacement
Beaverhill Lake Fm
Development well
Injection well
NTS 83J
Oil recovery
Oil saturation
Reservoir characteristic
Reservoir model
Reservoir performance
Sweep efficiency
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision D83-19 on application No. 830246 by ESSO resources to implement a hydrocarbon miscible flood in the Judy Creek Beaverhill Lake (BHL) A pool (TP.63-64, R.10-11, W5M); Board hearing 1983-07-19/20
Interveners
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Home Oil Company Ltd.
Chevron Canada Resources Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Mobil Oil Canada Ltd.
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Less detail

Decision 83-26

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2271
Applicant
Home Oil Company Limited
Application Number
830674
Title
Decision on application by Home Oil Company Limited, 1983 (hydrocarbon miscible flooe, Swan Hills Beaverhill Lake A&B pool unit no. 1)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Home Oil Company Limited, 1983 (hydrocarbon miscible flooe, Swan Hills Beaverhill Lake A&B pool unit no. 1)
Date
1983
Applicant
Home Oil Company Limited
Application Number
830674
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Enhanced recovery scheme
Miscible displacement
Swan Hills field
Beaverhill Lake Fm
Design criteria
Development well
Economic analysis
Injection well
Monitoring
NTS 83J
Oil recovery
Oil saturation
Recovery factor
Reservoir model
Sweep efficiency
Unitized field
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision D83-26 on application No. 830674 to implement a hydrocarbon miscible flood in the Swan Hills Beaverhill Lake A&B pool unit No. 1 (TP.66-68, R.9-11, W5M).
Interveners
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Esso Resources Canada Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 84-13

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1841
Applicant
Canadian Reserve Oil and Gas Ltd.
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Application Number
830847
840013
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Reserve Oil And Gas Ltd. and Texaco Canada Resources Ltd., 1984 enhanced oil recovery Pembina Nisku N pool)
Date
1984
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Reserve Oil And Gas Ltd. and Texaco Canada Resources Ltd., 1984 enhanced oil recovery Pembina Nisku N pool)
Date
1984
Applicant
Canadian Reserve Oil and Gas Ltd.
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Application Number
830847
840013
Hearing Panel
Strom NA
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Enhanced recovery scheme
Miscible displacement
Pembina field
Waterflooding
Economic analysis
Geologic interpretation
Negotiation
Nisku Fm
NTS 83G
Petroleum conservation
Recovery factor
Reservoir model
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision D84-13 on application No. 830847 by Canadian Reserve for approval of enhanced recovery by water injection and on application No. 840013 by Texaco for approval of a miscible flood scheme, both applications for the Nisku N pool (TP.50, R.11, W5M).
Less detail

Decision 84-20

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1156
Applicant
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Application Number
830725
Title
Examiners report on application by Texaco Canada Resources Ltd., 1984 (Open Creek gas processing plant)
Date
1984
Title
Examiners report on application by Texaco Canada Resources Ltd., 1984 (Open Creek gas processing plant)
Date
1984
Applicant
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Application Number
830725
Hearing Panel
Webber HJ
Bray JA
Homeniuk TF
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Open Creek field
Sour gas
Acidification
Air quality
Atmospheric diffusion
Basal Quartz Fm
Deposition
Emission
Environmental impact
Gas producing
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
Mathematical model
Monitoring
NTS 83B
Revision
Soil analysis
Selenium
Sulphur content
Sulphur dioxide
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E84-20 on application No. 830725 for approval to amend approval 3079 to increase the sulphur inlet rate to the open Creek gas plant located in LSD 10-34-42-5 W4M.
Interveners
Gibson, H.
Bauer, J.
Bauer, L.
Bryanton, W.
Eklund, C.
Eklund, P.
Less detail

Decision 85-20

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1248
Applicant
Altana Exploration Company
Application Number
841218
Title
Decision on application by Altana Exploration Company, 1985 (Caroline gas processing plant)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Altana Exploration Company, 1985 (Caroline gas processing plant)
Date
1985
Applicant
Altana Exploration Company
Application Number
841218
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Webber HJ
Bray JA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Caroline field
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Air quality
Deposition
Emission
Exhaust gas
Expansion
Hydrogen sulphide
Mathematical model
NTS 82O
Sulphur dioxide
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision D85-20 on application No. 841218 to amend approval 3616 to increase the maximum sulphur inlet rate at the Caroline gas processing plant in LSD 12-36-34-6 W5M.
Interveners
Dome Petroleum Limited
Less detail

Decision 85-26

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision822
Applicant
Andex Oil Co. Limited
Application Number
850245
Title
Examiner report on application by Andex Oil Co. Ltd., 1985 (Highvale gas processing plant to amend Highvale gas plant approval)
Date
1985
Title
Examiner report on application by Andex Oil Co. Ltd., 1985 (Highvale gas processing plant to amend Highvale gas plant approval)
Date
1985
Applicant
Andex Oil Co. Limited
Application Number
850245
Hearing Panel
Dilay JD
Remmer WG
Schnitzler WJ
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Deposition
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
Expansion
Flare
Gas producing
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
Mathematical model
Monitoring
NTS 83G
Soil analysis
Sulphur content
Sulphur dioxide
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E85-26 on application No. 850245 to amend Board approval 3019 for Andex Highvale gas plant located in LSD 10-4-51-4 W5M to increase maximum raw gas inlet capacity, increase hydrogen sulphide inlet rate.
Interveners
Vanderwell, J.
Vanderwell, P.
Ewashko, J.
Lauder, V.
Less detail

Decision 86-28

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision231
Applicant
Petro-Canada
Application Number
851021
Title
Examiner report on application by Petro-Canada, 1986 (two legal subdivision drilling spacing units and a geological and topographical order for Cardium oil production Wapiti field)
Date
1986
Title
Examiner report on application by Petro-Canada, 1986 (two legal subdivision drilling spacing units and a geological and topographical order for Cardium oil production Wapiti field)
Date
1986
Applicant
Petro-Canada
Application Number
851021
Hearing Panel
Purvis RA
Berndtsson NG
Langlo CA
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Spacing
Descriptors
Drilling spacing unit
Wapiti field
Cardium Fm
Equity
Geologic interpretation
Lease drainage
NTS 83L
Oil recovery
Oil well
Reservoir model
Target area
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.030
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.060
Notes
Examiners report E86-28 on application No. 851021 for an Order establishing two legal subdivision DSU's and for a geological and topographical Order (GTO) for the production of oil from the Cardium FM TP.67-68, R.7-8, W6M.
Interveners
BP Resources Canada Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 89-09

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision105
Applicant
Amoco Canada Resources Limited
Chevron Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
880332
880421
Title
Decision 89-09 : Amoco Canada Resources Ltd. and Chevron Canada Resources Limited : Application to wind down dry gas cycling and to proceed with maximun practical gas withdrawals, Kabob south, Beaverhill Lake A
Date
1989
Title
Decision 89-09 : Amoco Canada Resources Ltd. and Chevron Canada Resources Limited : Application to wind down dry gas cycling and to proceed with maximun practical gas withdrawals, Kabob south, Beaverhill Lake A
Date
1989
Applicant
Amoco Canada Resources Limited
Chevron Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
880332
880421
Hearing Panel
Strom NA
Morin EJ
Dilay JD
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Blowdown
Descriptors
Blowdown
Kaybob South field
Depletion
Development well
Gas cycling
Production rate
Reservoir model
Unit operation
Notes
ERCB Decision D89-9 (and interim decision) on application no's 880332 and 880421 to amend approval no. 4044 to wind down dry gas cycling and proceed with maximum practical gas withdrawals to achieve rapid blowdown of the remaining gas reserves in Kaybob South Beaverhill Lake Gas Units No. 2 & 3 respectively; Board hearing Sept 6 & 7, 1989
Interveners
Mobil Oil Canada
Petro-Canada Inc.
BP Resources Canada Limited
Western Gas Marketing Limited
Consolidated Natural Gas Limited
Unocal Resources Canada
Alberta & Southern Gas Co. Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 90-B

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision99
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Concord Scientific Corporation
Title
Field measurement program (Gascon2) (Gascon)
Date
1990
Title
Field measurement program (Gascon2) (Gascon)
Date
1990
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Concord Scientific Corporation
Category
Environment/Pollution
Descriptors
Air pollution
Airborne waste
Atmospheric diffusion
Blowout (well)
Emission
Gas leak
Hazard
Hydrogen sulphide
Meteorological data
Pipeline accident
Plume
Risk
Sour gas
Sulphur dioxide
Comparison
Evaluation
Mathematical model
Model
Monitoring
Sample analysis
Notes
Preliminary draft released 1990-04-06, final report released 1990-10 10 volume plus background release public document non-circulating no photocopies
Less detail

Decision 2000-22

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3168
Applicant
Gulf Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
960952
Title
Decision 2000-22: Gulf Canada Resources Limited request for the shut-in of associated gas, Surmont area
Date
2000
Title
Decision 2000-22: Gulf Canada Resources Limited request for the shut-in of associated gas, Surmont area
Date
2000
Applicant
Gulf Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
960952
Hearing Panel
Mink FJ
Dilay JD
Schnitzler WJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas/Bitumen
Descriptors
Bitumen
Compensation
Gas conservation
Gas producing
ID 99-01
Jurisdiction
Lease drainage
McMurray fm
Mineral right
Ownership
Reserve estimate
Reservoir model
Shutin well
Steam assisted gravity drainage
Surmont project
Oil sands oil recovery
Wabiskaw member
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S3.011
Oil Sands Conservation Regulation S3
Notes
EUB Decision 2000-22 on application no. 960952 by Gulf to shut in associated gas production from the Wabiskaw member of the McMurray formation on its Surmont leases due to pressure depletion of the gas pools would affect the recovery of bitumen reserves, estimated at 15 billion barrels.
Board directed 146 of 183 wells to be shut-in effective May 1, 2000.
Gas/bitumen inquiry report released March 25, 1998 allowed continued production of gas from wells drilled prior to July 1, 1998
Board hearing 1999-04-28 - 1999-09-24
The Board, pursuant to section 16 of the Energy Resources Conservation Act, on February 15, 2007 resicnded the order to produce documents dated July 8, 1999 relating to Proceeding No. 960952. Library has the Rescinding Order. See Call Number CA2AL ER D21/No. 2000-22 R.O.
Interveners
Petro-Canada Oil and Gas
Anzac Metis Local No. 334
Chipewyan Prairie Dene First Nation
Fort McMurray no. 468 First Nation
Durando Resources Corporation
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Surmont Producers Group
Canadian Forest Oil & Gas Ltd.
Giant Grosmont Petroleums Ltd.
NAL Resources Ltd.
Northstar Energy Corporation
Ocean Energy Resources Canada Ltd.
Paramount Resources Ltd.
Rio Alto Exploration Ltd.
Anderson Exploration Ltd.
Renaissance Energy Ltd.
Approval
Approved
Less detail

18 records – page 1 of 1.