50 records – page 1 of 3.

Decision 57-UNNUMBERED (57-08-30)

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision106
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
000085 (HEARING)
Title
Decision on the proration plan and the economic allowance (letter to all operators)
Date
1957
Title
Decision on the proration plan and the economic allowance (letter to all operators)
Date
1957
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
000085 (HEARING)
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Prorationing
Descriptors
Marketing
MPR
Proration
Alberta
Notes
Decision (released as letter to all operators) on proceeding no.85 to review the main principles of the Board's plan for proration to market demand and to consider the role and method of computation of the economic allowance
Less detail

Decision 61-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2421
Applicant
Bailey Selburn Oil and Gas Ltd.
B-H Petroleums (Alberta) Ltd.
California Standard Company
Charter Oil and Gas Ltd.
Crowfoot Exploration Ltd.
Selbay Exploration Ltd.
Consolidated Mic Mac Oils Ltd.
Mayfair Oil and Gas Ltd.
Richfield Oil Corporation
Application Number
000378
000240
Title
Decision on application by Bailey Selburn Oil and Gas Ltd., B-H Petroleums (Alberta) Ltd., California Standard Company, Charter Oil and Gas Ltd., Crowfoot Exploration Ltd., Selbay Exploration Ltd., J. Merril Wright, Jr., and Consolidated Mic Mac Oils Ltd., Mayfair Oil and Gas Ltd., and Richfield Oil Corporation, 1961 (gas removal)
Date
1961
Title
Decision on application by Bailey Selburn Oil and Gas Ltd., B-H Petroleums (Alberta) Ltd., California Standard Company, Charter Oil and Gas Ltd., Crowfoot Exploration Ltd., Selbay Exploration Ltd., J. Merril Wright, Jr., and Consolidated Mic Mac Oils Ltd., Mayfair Oil and Gas Ltd., and Richfield Oil Corporation, 1961 (gas removal)
Date
1961
Applicant
Bailey Selburn Oil and Gas Ltd.
B-H Petroleums (Alberta) Ltd.
California Standard Company
Charter Oil and Gas Ltd.
Crowfoot Exploration Ltd.
Selbay Exploration Ltd.
Consolidated Mic Mac Oils Ltd.
Mayfair Oil and Gas Ltd.
Richfield Oil Corporation
Application Number
000378
000240
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas removal
Descriptors
Gas removal
Alberta
Equity
Etzikom field
Gas demand
Gas producing
Gas reserve
Marketing
Medicine Hat area
Medicine Hat field
NTS 72E
NTS 72L
Legal References
Gas Resources Preservation Act 1956
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S36
Notes
ERCB Report 61-5 on application no. 378 by Bailey Selburn et al and on application no. 240 by Consolidated Mic Mac et al for removal of gas produced in the Medicine Hat area; Board heard original applications on 1960-08-22 & 1960-08-23 and then held a public hearing 1961-03-20 to hear representations respecting alternate methods of marketing production to minimize the impact of drainage
See related report 60-7
Less detail

Decision 72-E-OG

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2483
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
6157
Title
Report on field pricing of gas in Alberta
Date
1972
Title
Report on field pricing of gas in Alberta
Date
1972
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
6157
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Craig DR
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas pricing
Descriptors
Gas price
Alberta
Forecasting
Gas removal
Marketing
Procedure
Recommendation
Notes
ERCB report 72-E-OG (and addendum titled summary of arguments) on proceeding No. 6157 to review the field pricing of natural gas in Alberta; the review was held at the request of the Alberta Government (per Order in Council 204/72); Board hearing (Govier/Craig/Millard) held 1972-02-24 through 1972-03-02/13/15/16/17 (phase 1) and phase 2 held 72-06-13/19 through 30; see also later reports on the subject - ERCB reports 73-I-OG and 74-B
Less detail

Decision 74-J

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2398
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
N/A
Title
Adequacy of Alberta’s reserves of conventional oil to meet market requirements
Date
1974
Title
Adequacy of Alberta’s reserves of conventional oil to meet market requirements
Date
1974
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
N/A
Hearing Panel
N/A
Hearing Type
N/A
Category
Oil supply
Descriptors
Crude oil demand
Oil reserve
Self-sufficiency
Alberta
Crude oil
Manufactured crude oil
Marketing
Production rate
Less detail

Decision 75-B

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2366
Applicant
Canadian Montana Pipe Line Company
Application Number
7930
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Montana Pipe Line Company, 1975 (Gas Resources Preservation Act)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Montana Pipe Line Company, 1975 (Gas Resources Preservation Act)
Date
1975
Applicant
Canadian Montana Pipe Line Company
Application Number
7930
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Craig DR
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas removal
Descriptors
Gas removal
Contract
ERCB 73-A
ERCB 74-D
ERCB 74-P
ERCB 74-V
Gas price
Gas purchase
Marketing
Legal References
Gas Resources Preservation Act
Notes
ERCB report 75-B on application No. 7930 to amend permit No. CM 61-2 by adding the Granlea field to the list of fields, pools, and areas from which gas may be taken for removal.
Less detail

Decision 76-E

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2383
Applicant
Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
Application Number
8744
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1976 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1976 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1976
Applicant
Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
Application Number
8744
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Industrial development permit
Medicine Hat area
ETHANOL
Benefit cost analysis
Capitalized cost
Economic analysis
Efficiency
Gas supply
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 72E
Raw material
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 76-E on application No. 8744 to use gas as raw material and fuel to produce methanol in a plant to be constructed near Medicine Hat (permit AGC 77-1); Board hearing 1976-01-28/29
Less detail

Decision 77-25

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2123
Applicant
Eagle Explorations Ltd.
Application Number
770308
Title
Decision on application by Eagle Explorations Ltd., 10977 (order declaring that TransCanada Pipelines Limited be declared a common purchaser of gas produced from the Bruce Viking A pool in the vicinity of township 48, range 16, W4M)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Eagle Explorations Ltd., 10977 (order declaring that TransCanada Pipelines Limited be declared a common purchaser of gas produced from the Bruce Viking A pool in the vicinity of township 48, range 16, W4M)
Date
1977
Applicant
Eagle Explorations Ltd.
Application Number
770308
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Manyluk AF
Fuller KW
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Common purchaser
Descriptors
Bruce field
Common purchaser
Gas producing
Lease drainage
Marketing
NTS 83H
Viking Fm
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S52
Notes
Decision 77-25 on application No. 770308 to declare TCPL a common purchaser of gas produced from the Bruce Viking A pool in the vicinity of TP.48, R.16, W4M.
Interveners
Voyager Petroleums Ltd.
TransCanada PipeLines Limited
Less detail

Decision 77-28

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2120
Applicant
Universal Gas Co. Ltd.
Application Number
770602
Title
Decision on application by Universal Gas Co. Ltd., 1977 (order declaring that TransCanada Pipelines Limited be a common purchaser of gas produced from an undefined Glauconitic pool in the Ellscott area)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Universal Gas Co. Ltd., 1977 (order declaring that TransCanada Pipelines Limited be a common purchaser of gas produced from an undefined Glauconitic pool in the Ellscott area)
Date
1977
Applicant
Universal Gas Co. Ltd.
Application Number
770602
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Fuller KW
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Common purchaser
Descriptors
Common purchaser
Jiles field
Gas producing
Glauconitic sandstone
Lease drainage
Marketing
NTS 83I
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S52
Notes
Decision 77-28 on application No. 770602 to declare TCPL a common purchaser of gas produced from an undefined Glauconitic pool in 10-24-63-21 W4.
Interveners
Mesa Petroluem (N.A.) Co.
TransCanada PipeLines Limited
Less detail

Decision 78-09

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2111
Applicant
Spur Engineering Ltd.
Gordon Land Services Ltd.
Application Number
770793
Title
Decision on application by Spur Engineering Ltd. and Roger M. Gordon Land Services Ltd. ltd., 1978 (common purchaser, common carrier, common processor and rateable take for gas produced from the Lacombe Viking A pool)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Spur Engineering Ltd. and Roger M. Gordon Land Services Ltd. ltd., 1978 (common purchaser, common carrier, common processor and rateable take for gas produced from the Lacombe Viking A pool)
Date
1978
Applicant
Spur Engineering Ltd.
Gordon Land Services Ltd.
Application Number
770793
Hearing Panel
Pearson DG
Pow JR
Warne GA
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Common purchaser
Descriptors
Common carrier
Common purchaser
Common processor
Lacombe field
Rateable take of gas
Allowable production
Equity
Capacity
Gas pipeline
Gas producing
Lease drainage
Marketing
NTS 83A
Viking Fm
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S35
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S49
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S52
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S54
Notes
Decision 78-9 on application No. 770793 for an Order declaring NUL a common purchaser of gas from the Lacombe Viking A pool, for orders declaring Sulpetro a common carrier and common processor of gas produced from the pool and for an Order distributing gas production from the pool equitably among wells (TP.40, R.26, W4M); rateable take application under section 35 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act was dismissed
Interveners
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Sulpetro of Canada Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 78-C

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2332
Applicant
Gulf Oil Canada Limited
Application Number
770220
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Oil Canada Limited, 1978 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Oil Canada Limited, 1978 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1978
Applicant
Gulf Oil Canada Limited
Application Number
770220
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Industrial development permit
Oil refinery
Edmonton area
Petroleum product
Butane
Crude oil
Demand (economics)
ERCB 77-C
ERCB 77-H
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 83H
Pentanes plus - raw material
Raw material
Supply (economics)
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 78-C on application No. 770220 for an IDP authorizing use of crude oil, butanes and gas as feedstock & fuel and pentanes-plus as raw material and gas to manufacture refinery products (gasoline and diesel fuel) at its Edmonton refinery (section 5, TP.52, R.23, W4M); permit GOC 78-2
Less detail

Decision 80-25

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2014
Applicant
Celanese Canada Inc.
Celanese Corporation
Application Number
800124
Title
Decision on application by Celanese Canada Inc. and Celanese Corporation, 1980 (use natural gas as feedstock and fuel to manufacture methanol at clover bar)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Celanese Canada Inc. and Celanese Corporation, 1980 (use natural gas as feedstock and fuel to manufacture methanol at clover bar)
Date
1980
Applicant
Celanese Canada Inc.
Celanese Corporation
Application Number
800124
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
Webber HJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Clover Bar area
Industrial development permit
Methanol
Benefit cost analysis
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 83H
Safety
Supply (economics)
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision on application to use natural gas as a raw material and fuel to produce methanol in a new unit to be constructed on its existing plant site at Clover Bar (section 17, TP.53, R.23, W4M)
Interveners
Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd.
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta
Chevron Standard Limited
Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
R.K. Dixon Engineering Services Ltd.
Sultana Corporation
City of Medicine Hat
City of Edmonton
County of Strathmore
Less detail

Decision 81-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2005
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
ESSO Chemical Canada
Shell Canada Limited
Nova, an Alberta Corporation
Application Number
800530
800733
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Esso Chemical Canada and Shell Canada Limited and Nova, an Alberta Corporation, 1981 (styrene monomer production)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Esso Chemical Canada and Shell Canada Limited and Nova, an Alberta Corporation, 1981 (styrene monomer production)
Date
1981
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
ESSO Chemical Canada
Shell Canada Limited
Nova, an Alberta Corporation
Application Number
800530
800733
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Bohme VE
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Bruderheim area
Chemical plant
Fort Saskatchewan area
Industrial development permit
Styrene
Benefit cost analysis
Benzene
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Ethylene - raw material
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 83H
Raw material
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 81-3 on application No. 800530 by AEC/ESSO to use gas, benzene and ethylene to produce styrene monomer in plant to be located adjacent Shell/Husky Strathcona refinery (TP.55-56, R.21, W4M); Board hearing 1980-11-25/26
Interveners
C-I-L Inc.
The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 81-10

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1998
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Application Number
800853
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene)
Date
1981
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Application Number
800853
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Webber HJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Ethylene
Industrial development permit
Red Deer area
Air quality
Benefit cost analysis
Design criteria
Emission
Environmental impact
Ethane
Ethane - raw material
Forecasting
Land use
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
Noise (sound)
NTS 83A
Pollution
Raw material
Socio-economic effect
Supply (economics)
Water
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 81-10 on application No. 800853 to use ethane as feedstock and natural gas as fuel to manufacture ethylene in plant to be constructed (unit 3) adjacent to present facilities (units 1&2) near Joffre (TP.38, R.25, W4M); Board hearing 1981-04-07/08
Interveners
Preserve Agricultural Land
Red Deer Regional Planning Commission
Hainsworth, B.W.
Chessor, D.
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Esso Chemical Canada
Du Pont Canada Inc.
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
NOVA, AN ALBERTA CORPORATION
Shell Canada Limited
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Esso Resources Canada Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Sulpetro Limited
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 81-16

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1992
Applicant
Nova, an Alberta Corporation
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
800910
Title
Decision on application by Nova, an Alberta Corporation and Shell Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Nova, an Alberta Corporation and Shell Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
Date
1981
Applicant
Nova, an Alberta Corporation
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
800910
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Webber HJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Ethylene homopolymer
Industrial development permit
Red Deer area
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Ethylene - raw material
Land use
Locating
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
Noise (sound)
NTS 83A
Plant location
Pollution
Socio-economic effect
Supply (economics)
Water quality
Water supply
Notes
Decision 81-16 on application No. 800910 to use ethylene as feedstock and gas as fuel to manufacture polyethylene at a LINEAR low-density polyethylene plant to be constructed on the site of Alberta gas ethylene'S existing ethylene plant east of Red Deer (TP.38-40, R.23-27, W4M).
Interveners
Preserve Agricultural Land
Alberta Institute of Agrologists Red Deer Branch
F.E.M. Farms
Hainsworth, J.W.
Federation of Alberta Naturalists Land Use Committee
Red Deer Regional Planning Commission
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Du Pont Canada Inc.
Esso Chemical Canada
Less detail

Decision 81-17

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1991
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Dupont Canada Inc.
Application Number
801017
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Dupont Canada Inc., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Dupont Canada Inc., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
Date
1981
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Dupont Canada Inc.
Application Number
801017
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Goodman CJ
Webber HJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Ethylene homopolymer
Industrial development permit
Redwater area
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Ethylene - raw material
Locating
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 83H
Plant location
Socio-economic effect
Supply (economics)
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 81-17 on application No. 801017 to use ethylene as feedstock and gas as fuel to manufacture polyethylene at a plant to be constructed near Redwater (TP.56, R.21-22, W4M); Board hearing 1981-07-07/08
Interveners
Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd.
C-I-L Inc.
Trimac Limited
Town of Gibbons
Council of the Town of Redwater
Dow Chemical of Canada, Limited
Minchau, D.
Minchau, C.
Municipal District of Sturgeon No. 90
NOVA, AN ALBERTA CORPORATION
Shell Canada Limited
Smulski, K.
The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Less detail

Decision 81-22

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1744
Applicant
Canadian Superior Oil Ltd.
Farries Engineering (1977) Ltd.
Application Number
810260
Title
Examiners report on application by Canadian Superior Oil Ltd., 1981 (order declaring common purchasers for gas produced from the Brazeau River Elkton-Shunda A pool)
Date
1981
Title
Examiners report on application by Canadian Superior Oil Ltd., 1981 (order declaring common purchasers for gas produced from the Brazeau River Elkton-Shunda A pool)
Date
1981
Applicant
Canadian Superior Oil Ltd.
Farries Engineering (1977) Ltd.
Application Number
810260
Hearing Panel
Warne GA
Keushnig HR
Nichol JR
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Common purchaser
Descriptors
Brazeau River field
Common purchaser
Gas producing
Gas purchase
Lease drainage
Marketing
NTS 83B
Reservoir boundary
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S52
Notes
ERCB Examiners report no.E81-22 on application No. 810260 for an Order declaring TransCanada Pipelines Limited and Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd. to be common purchasers of gas from the Brazeau River Elkton-Shunda A pool (TP.43-45, R.11-12, W5M).
Interveners
Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd.
CDC Oil & Gas Limited
Less detail

Decision 81-22

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1986
Applicant
C.I.L. Inc.
Trimac Ltd.
Application Number
800908
Title
Decision on application by C.I.L. Inc. and Trimac Ltd., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by C.I.L. Inc. and Trimac Ltd., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
Date
1981
Applicant
C.I.L. Inc.
Trimac Ltd.
Application Number
800908
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Goodman CJ
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Edmonton area
Ethylene homopolymer
Industrial development permit
Benefit cost analysis
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Ethylene - raw material
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 83H
Socio-economic effect
Supply (economics)
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 81-22 on application No. 800908 to use ethylene as feedstock and gas as fuel to manufacture polyethylene in a new plant to be constructed on site of applicant's existing plant site in Edmonton (section 36-52-24 W4M).
Interveners
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Esso Chemical of Canada
Du Pont Canada Inc.
The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 81-24

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1984
Applicant
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Application Number
800889
Title
Decision on application by Union Carbide Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene glycol)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Union Carbide Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene glycol)
Date
1981
Applicant
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Application Number
800889
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
McAndrews CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Ethylene glycol
Industrial development permit
Prentiss area
Agricultural land
Conflict
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Energy development
Environmental impact
Ethylene - raw material
Land use
Locating
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 83A
Plant location
Socio-economic effect
Supply (economics)
Water supply
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 81-24 on application No. 800889 to use ethylene as feedstock and gas as fuel to produce ethylene glycol in a new plant to be constructed near Prentiss (section 30-39-25 W4M); Board hearing 1981-04-14/15/16/20/21
Interveners
Preserve Agricultural Land
Craigievar Farms
Unifarm
Christian Farmers Federation
Red Deer Board of the Alberta Institute of Agrologists
Superior Sod Farms
F.E.M. Farms Ltd.
Carlyle, R.J.
Friesen, G.
Hainsworth, J.W.
Russell, M.
Russell, E.
Low, D.C.
Chessor, D.
Sather, A.P.
Red Deer River Regional Planning Commission
Buffalo Lake Regional Resources Project
Alix Chamber of Commerce
Village of Mirror
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Esso Chemical Canada
Du Pont Canada Inc.
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
NOVA, AN ALBERTA CORPORATION
Shell Canada Limited
Less detail

Decision 81-28

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1980
Applicant
Celanese Canada Inc.
Application Number
810535
Title
Decision on application by Celanese Canada Inc., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture acetic acid and vinyl acetate monomer)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Celanese Canada Inc., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture acetic acid and vinyl acetate monomer)
Date
1981
Applicant
Celanese Canada Inc.
Application Number
810535
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Bohme VE
Webber HJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Acetic acid
Chemical plant
Edmonton area
Industrial development permit
Vinyl acetate
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Ethylene - raw material
Marketing
Methanol
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 83H
Raw material
Socio-economic effect
Supply (economics)
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 81-28 on application No. 810535 to use gas as feedstock & fuel and ethylene & methanol as feedstock to manufacture acetic acid & vinyl acetate monomer in a new plant to be constructed on existing Clover Bar site (section 17-53-23 W4M).
Interveners
The City of Edmonton
Dow Chemical of Canada, Inc.
C-I-L Inc.
Trimac Ltd.
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Esso Chemical Canada
Enesco Chem Ltd.
The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 82-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2073
Applicant
Dow Chemical Canada Inc.
Application Number
810042
810043
Title
Decision on application by Dow Chemical Canada Inc., 1982 (Chlorine and caustic soda plant expansion and ethylene dichloride and vinyl chloride monomer plant expansion)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Dow Chemical Canada Inc., 1982 (Chlorine and caustic soda plant expansion and ethylene dichloride and vinyl chloride monomer plant expansion)
Date
1982
Applicant
Dow Chemical Canada Inc.
Application Number
810042
810043
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Chlorine
Chloroethylene
Dichloroethane
Ethylene
Fort Saskatchewan area
Industrial development permit
Sodium hydroxide
Capitalized cost
Cost analysis
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Expansion
Marketing
Monitoring
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 83H
Revision
Supply (economics)
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S30
Notes
Decision 82-5 on application No. 810042 to amend IDP No. DCC 80-7 for use of additional natural gas as fuel for production of chlorine and caustic soda and No. 810043 for use of ethylene and natural gas as raw material and fuel for production of ethylene facilities to be installed at Dow's existing plane at Fort Saskatchewan (located in sections 2 & 11-55-22 W4M.
Interveners
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Esso Chemical Canada
The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Less detail

50 records – page 1 of 3.