Narrow Results By
Applicant
- Advocate Oil and Gas Limited 1
- Alberta Energy Company Limited 3
- Alberta Energy and Utilities Board 1
- Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited 2
- Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited 1
- Anderson Exploration Limited 1
- B-H Petroleums (Alberta) Ltd. 1
- Bailey Selburn Oil and Gas Ltd. 1
- Biewag Energy Resources Ltd. 1
- Bow River Pipelines Ltd. 1
- Bow Valley Industries Ltd. 1
- C.I.L. Inc. 1
Decision 57-UNNUMBERED (57-08-30)
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision106
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 000085 (HEARING)
- Title
- Decision on the proration plan and the economic allowance (letter to all operators)
- Date
- 1957
- Title
- Decision on the proration plan and the economic allowance (letter to all operators)
- Date
- 1957
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 000085 (HEARING)
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Prorationing
- Notes
- Decision (released as letter to all operators) on proceeding no.85 to review the main principles of the Board's plan for proration to market demand and to consider the role and method of computation of the economic allowance
Decision 61-05
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2421
- Applicant
- Bailey Selburn Oil and Gas Ltd.
- B-H Petroleums (Alberta) Ltd.
- California Standard Company
- Charter Oil and Gas Ltd.
- Crowfoot Exploration Ltd.
- Selbay Exploration Ltd.
- Consolidated Mic Mac Oils Ltd.
- Mayfair Oil and Gas Ltd.
- Richfield Oil Corporation
- Application Number
- 000378
- 000240
- Title
- Decision on application by Bailey Selburn Oil and Gas Ltd., B-H Petroleums (Alberta) Ltd., California Standard Company, Charter Oil and Gas Ltd., Crowfoot Exploration Ltd., Selbay Exploration Ltd., J. Merril Wright, Jr., and Consolidated Mic Mac Oils Ltd., Mayfair Oil and Gas Ltd., and Richfield Oil Corporation, 1961 (gas removal)
- Date
- 1961
- Title
- Decision on application by Bailey Selburn Oil and Gas Ltd., B-H Petroleums (Alberta) Ltd., California Standard Company, Charter Oil and Gas Ltd., Crowfoot Exploration Ltd., Selbay Exploration Ltd., J. Merril Wright, Jr., and Consolidated Mic Mac Oils Ltd., Mayfair Oil and Gas Ltd., and Richfield Oil Corporation, 1961 (gas removal)
- Date
- 1961
- Applicant
- Bailey Selburn Oil and Gas Ltd.
- B-H Petroleums (Alberta) Ltd.
- California Standard Company
- Charter Oil and Gas Ltd.
- Crowfoot Exploration Ltd.
- Selbay Exploration Ltd.
- Consolidated Mic Mac Oils Ltd.
- Mayfair Oil and Gas Ltd.
- Richfield Oil Corporation
- Application Number
- 000378
- 000240
- Hearing Panel
- Govier GW
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Gas removal
- Descriptors
- Gas removal
- Alberta
- Equity
- Etzikom field
- Gas demand
- Gas producing
- Gas reserve
- Marketing
- Medicine Hat area
- Medicine Hat field
- NTS 72E
- NTS 72L
- Legal References
- Gas Resources Preservation Act 1956
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S36
- Notes
- ERCB Report 61-5 on application no. 378 by Bailey Selburn et al and on application no. 240 by Consolidated Mic Mac et al for removal of gas produced in the Medicine Hat area; Board heard original applications on 1960-08-22 & 1960-08-23 and then held a public hearing 1961-03-20 to hear representations respecting alternate methods of marketing production to minimize the impact of drainage
- See related report 60-7
Decision 72-E-OG
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2483
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 6157
- Title
- Report on field pricing of gas in Alberta
- Date
- 1972
- Title
- Report on field pricing of gas in Alberta
- Date
- 1972
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- 6157
- Hearing Panel
- Govier GW
- Craig DR
- Millard V
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Gas pricing
- Descriptors
- Gas price
- Alberta
- Forecasting
- Gas removal
- Marketing
- Procedure
- Recommendation
- Notes
- ERCB report 72-E-OG (and addendum titled summary of arguments) on proceeding No. 6157 to review the field pricing of natural gas in Alberta; the review was held at the request of the Alberta Government (per Order in Council 204/72); Board hearing (Govier/Craig/Millard) held 1972-02-24 through 1972-03-02/13/15/16/17 (phase 1) and phase 2 held 72-06-13/19 through 30; see also later reports on the subject - ERCB reports 73-I-OG and 74-B
Decision 74-J
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2398
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- N/A
- Title
- Adequacy of Alberta’s reserves of conventional oil to meet market requirements
- Date
- 1974
- Title
- Adequacy of Alberta’s reserves of conventional oil to meet market requirements
- Date
- 1974
- Applicant
- Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Application Number
- N/A
- Hearing Panel
- N/A
- Hearing Type
- N/A
- Category
- Oil supply
- Descriptors
- Crude oil demand
- Oil reserve
- Self-sufficiency
- Alberta
- Crude oil
- Manufactured crude oil
- Marketing
- Production rate
Decision 75-B
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2366
- Applicant
- Canadian Montana Pipe Line Company
- Application Number
- 7930
- Title
- Decision on application by Canadian Montana Pipe Line Company, 1975 (Gas Resources Preservation Act)
- Date
- 1975
- Title
- Decision on application by Canadian Montana Pipe Line Company, 1975 (Gas Resources Preservation Act)
- Date
- 1975
- Applicant
- Canadian Montana Pipe Line Company
- Application Number
- 7930
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- Craig DR
- DeSorcy GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Gas removal
- Descriptors
- Gas removal
- Contract
- ERCB 73-A
- ERCB 74-D
- ERCB 74-P
- ERCB 74-V
- Gas price
- Gas purchase
- Marketing
- Legal References
- Gas Resources Preservation Act
- Notes
- ERCB report 75-B on application No. 7930 to amend permit No. CM 61-2 by adding the Granlea field to the list of fields, pools, and areas from which gas may be taken for removal.
Decision 76-E
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2383
- Applicant
- Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
- Application Number
- 8744
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1976 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
- Date
- 1976
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1976 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
- Date
- 1976
- Applicant
- Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
- Application Number
- 8744
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- Berkowitz N
- DeSorcy GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Chemical plant
- Industrial development permit
- Medicine Hat area
- ETHANOL
- Benefit cost analysis
- Capitalized cost
- Economic analysis
- Efficiency
- Gas supply
- Marketing
- Natural gas - fuel
- Natural gas - raw material
- NTS 72E
- Raw material
- Socio-economic effect
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- ERCB report 76-E on application No. 8744 to use gas as raw material and fuel to produce methanol in a plant to be constructed near Medicine Hat (permit AGC 77-1); Board hearing 1976-01-28/29
Decision 77-25
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2123
- Applicant
- Eagle Explorations Ltd.
- Application Number
- 770308
- Title
- Decision on application by Eagle Explorations Ltd., 10977 (order declaring that TransCanada Pipelines Limited be declared a common purchaser of gas produced from the Bruce Viking A pool in the vicinity of township 48, range 16, W4M)
- Date
- 1977
- Title
- Decision on application by Eagle Explorations Ltd., 10977 (order declaring that TransCanada Pipelines Limited be declared a common purchaser of gas produced from the Bruce Viking A pool in the vicinity of township 48, range 16, W4M)
- Date
- 1977
- Applicant
- Eagle Explorations Ltd.
- Application Number
- 770308
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- Manyluk AF
- Fuller KW
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Common purchaser
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S52
- Notes
- Decision 77-25 on application No. 770308 to declare TCPL a common purchaser of gas produced from the Bruce Viking A pool in the vicinity of TP.48, R.16, W4M.
- Interveners
- Voyager Petroleums Ltd.
- TransCanada PipeLines Limited
Decision 77-28
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2120
- Applicant
- Universal Gas Co. Ltd.
- Application Number
- 770602
- Title
- Decision on application by Universal Gas Co. Ltd., 1977 (order declaring that TransCanada Pipelines Limited be a common purchaser of gas produced from an undefined Glauconitic pool in the Ellscott area)
- Date
- 1977
- Title
- Decision on application by Universal Gas Co. Ltd., 1977 (order declaring that TransCanada Pipelines Limited be a common purchaser of gas produced from an undefined Glauconitic pool in the Ellscott area)
- Date
- 1977
- Applicant
- Universal Gas Co. Ltd.
- Application Number
- 770602
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Bohme VE
- Fuller KW
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Common purchaser
- Descriptors
- Common purchaser
- Jiles field
- Gas producing
- Glauconitic sandstone
- Lease drainage
- Marketing
- NTS 83I
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S52
- Notes
- Decision 77-28 on application No. 770602 to declare TCPL a common purchaser of gas produced from an undefined Glauconitic pool in 10-24-63-21 W4.
- Interveners
- Mesa Petroluem (N.A.) Co.
- TransCanada PipeLines Limited
Decision 78-09
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2111
- Applicant
- Spur Engineering Ltd.
- Gordon Land Services Ltd.
- Application Number
- 770793
- Title
- Decision on application by Spur Engineering Ltd. and Roger M. Gordon Land Services Ltd. ltd., 1978 (common purchaser, common carrier, common processor and rateable take for gas produced from the Lacombe Viking A pool)
- Date
- 1978
- Title
- Decision on application by Spur Engineering Ltd. and Roger M. Gordon Land Services Ltd. ltd., 1978 (common purchaser, common carrier, common processor and rateable take for gas produced from the Lacombe Viking A pool)
- Date
- 1978
- Application Number
- 770793
- Hearing Panel
- Pearson DG
- Pow JR
- Warne GA
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Common purchaser
- Descriptors
- Common carrier
- Common purchaser
- Common processor
- Lacombe field
- Rateable take of gas
- Allowable production
- Equity
- Capacity
- Gas pipeline
- Gas producing
- Lease drainage
- Marketing
- NTS 83A
- Viking Fm
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S35
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S49
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S52
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S54
- Notes
- Decision 78-9 on application No. 770793 for an Order declaring NUL a common purchaser of gas from the Lacombe Viking A pool, for orders declaring Sulpetro a common carrier and common processor of gas produced from the pool and for an Order distributing gas production from the pool equitably among wells (TP.40, R.26, W4M); rateable take application under section 35 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act was dismissed
- Interveners
- Northwestern Utilities Limited
- Sulpetro of Canada Ltd.
Decision 78-C
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2332
- Applicant
- Gulf Oil Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 770220
- Title
- Decision on application by Gulf Oil Canada Limited, 1978 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
- Date
- 1978
- Title
- Decision on application by Gulf Oil Canada Limited, 1978 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
- Date
- 1978
- Applicant
- Gulf Oil Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 770220
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Industrial development permit
- Oil refinery
- Edmonton area
- Petroleum product
- Butane
- Crude oil
- Demand (economics)
- ERCB 77-C
- ERCB 77-H
- Marketing
- Natural gas - fuel
- Natural gas - raw material
- NTS 83H
- Pentanes plus - raw material
- Raw material
- Supply (economics)
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- ERCB report 78-C on application No. 770220 for an IDP authorizing use of crude oil, butanes and gas as feedstock & fuel and pentanes-plus as raw material and gas to manufacture refinery products (gasoline and diesel fuel) at its Edmonton refinery (section 5, TP.52, R.23, W4M); permit GOC 78-2
Decision 80-25
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2014
- Applicant
- Celanese Canada Inc.
- Celanese Corporation
- Application Number
- 800124
- Title
- Decision on application by Celanese Canada Inc. and Celanese Corporation, 1980 (use natural gas as feedstock and fuel to manufacture methanol at clover bar)
- Date
- 1980
- Title
- Decision on application by Celanese Canada Inc. and Celanese Corporation, 1980 (use natural gas as feedstock and fuel to manufacture methanol at clover bar)
- Date
- 1980
- Applicant
- Celanese Canada Inc.
- Celanese Corporation
- Application Number
- 800124
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- Berkowitz N
- Webber HJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Clover Bar area
- Industrial development permit
- Methanol
- Benefit cost analysis
- Demand (economics)
- Economic analysis
- Emergency procedure
- Environmental impact
- Marketing
- Natural gas - fuel
- Natural gas - raw material
- NTS 83H
- Safety
- Supply (economics)
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- Decision on application to use natural gas as a raw material and fuel to produce methanol in a new unit to be constructed on its existing plant site at Clover Bar (section 17, TP.53, R.23, W4M)
- Interveners
- Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd.
- Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
- Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta
- Chevron Standard Limited
- Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
- R.K. Dixon Engineering Services Ltd.
- Sultana Corporation
- City of Medicine Hat
- City of Edmonton
- County of Strathmore
Decision 81-03
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2005
- Applicant
- Alberta Energy Company Limited
- ESSO Chemical Canada
- Shell Canada Limited
- Nova, an Alberta Corporation
- Application Number
- 800530
- 800733
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Esso Chemical Canada and Shell Canada Limited and Nova, an Alberta Corporation, 1981 (styrene monomer production)
- Date
- 1981
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Esso Chemical Canada and Shell Canada Limited and Nova, an Alberta Corporation, 1981 (styrene monomer production)
- Date
- 1981
- Applicant
- Alberta Energy Company Limited
- ESSO Chemical Canada
- Shell Canada Limited
- Nova, an Alberta Corporation
- Application Number
- 800530
- 800733
- Hearing Panel
- Berkowitz N
- Bohme VE
- Mink FJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Bruderheim area
- Chemical plant
- Fort Saskatchewan area
- Industrial development permit
- Styrene
- Benefit cost analysis
- Benzene
- Demand (economics)
- Economic analysis
- Ethylene - raw material
- Marketing
- Natural gas - fuel
- Natural gas - raw material
- NTS 83H
- Raw material
- Socio-economic effect
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- Decision 81-3 on application No. 800530 by AEC/ESSO to use gas, benzene and ethylene to produce styrene monomer in plant to be located adjacent Shell/Husky Strathcona refinery (TP.55-56, R.21, W4M); Board hearing 1980-11-25/26
- Interveners
- C-I-L Inc.
- The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Decision 81-10
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1998
- Applicant
- Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
- Application Number
- 800853
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene)
- Date
- 1981
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene)
- Date
- 1981
- Applicant
- Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
- Application Number
- 800853
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Strom NA
- Webber HJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Chemical plant
- Ethylene
- Industrial development permit
- Red Deer area
- Air quality
- Benefit cost analysis
- Design criteria
- Emission
- Environmental impact
- Ethane
- Ethane - raw material
- Forecasting
- Land use
- Marketing
- Natural gas - fuel
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 83A
- Pollution
- Raw material
- Socio-economic effect
- Supply (economics)
- Water
- Water quality
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- Decision 81-10 on application No. 800853 to use ethane as feedstock and natural gas as fuel to manufacture ethylene in plant to be constructed (unit 3) adjacent to present facilities (units 1&2) near Joffre (TP.38, R.25, W4M); Board hearing 1981-04-07/08
- Interveners
- Preserve Agricultural Land
- Red Deer Regional Planning Commission
- Hainsworth, B.W.
- Chessor, D.
- Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
- Esso Chemical Canada
- Du Pont Canada Inc.
- Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
- NOVA, AN ALBERTA CORPORATION
- Shell Canada Limited
- Union Carbide Canada Limited
- Dome Petroleum Limited
- Esso Resources Canada Limited
- Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
- Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
- Sulpetro Limited
- Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Decision 81-16
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1992
- Applicant
- Nova, an Alberta Corporation
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 800910
- Title
- Decision on application by Nova, an Alberta Corporation and Shell Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
- Date
- 1981
- Title
- Decision on application by Nova, an Alberta Corporation and Shell Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
- Date
- 1981
- Application Number
- 800910
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Strom NA
- Webber HJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Chemical plant
- Ethylene homopolymer
- Industrial development permit
- Red Deer area
- Demand (economics)
- Economic analysis
- Environmental impact
- Ethylene - raw material
- Land use
- Locating
- Marketing
- Natural gas - fuel
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 83A
- Plant location
- Pollution
- Socio-economic effect
- Supply (economics)
- Water quality
- Water supply
- Notes
- Decision 81-16 on application No. 800910 to use ethylene as feedstock and gas as fuel to manufacture polyethylene at a LINEAR low-density polyethylene plant to be constructed on the site of Alberta gas ethylene'S existing ethylene plant east of Red Deer (TP.38-40, R.23-27, W4M).
- Interveners
- Preserve Agricultural Land
- Alberta Institute of Agrologists Red Deer Branch
- F.E.M. Farms
- Hainsworth, J.W.
- Federation of Alberta Naturalists Land Use Committee
- Red Deer Regional Planning Commission
- Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
- Union Carbide Canada Limited
- Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
- Du Pont Canada Inc.
- Esso Chemical Canada
Decision 81-17
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1991
- Applicant
- Alberta Energy Company Limited
- Dupont Canada Inc.
- Application Number
- 801017
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Dupont Canada Inc., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
- Date
- 1981
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Dupont Canada Inc., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
- Date
- 1981
- Application Number
- 801017
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- Goodman CJ
- Webber HJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Chemical plant
- Ethylene homopolymer
- Industrial development permit
- Redwater area
- Demand (economics)
- Economic analysis
- Ethylene - raw material
- Locating
- Marketing
- Natural gas - fuel
- NTS 83H
- Plant location
- Socio-economic effect
- Supply (economics)
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- Decision 81-17 on application No. 801017 to use ethylene as feedstock and gas as fuel to manufacture polyethylene at a plant to be constructed near Redwater (TP.56, R.21-22, W4M); Board hearing 1981-07-07/08
- Interveners
- Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd.
- C-I-L Inc.
- Trimac Limited
- Town of Gibbons
- Council of the Town of Redwater
- Dow Chemical of Canada, Limited
- Minchau, D.
- Minchau, C.
- Municipal District of Sturgeon No. 90
- NOVA, AN ALBERTA CORPORATION
- Shell Canada Limited
- Smulski, K.
- The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
- Union Carbide Canada Limited
Decision 81-22
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1744
- Applicant
- Canadian Superior Oil Ltd.
- Farries Engineering (1977) Ltd.
- Application Number
- 810260
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Canadian Superior Oil Ltd., 1981 (order declaring common purchasers for gas produced from the Brazeau River Elkton-Shunda A pool)
- Date
- 1981
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Canadian Superior Oil Ltd., 1981 (order declaring common purchasers for gas produced from the Brazeau River Elkton-Shunda A pool)
- Date
- 1981
- Application Number
- 810260
- Hearing Panel
- Warne GA
- Keushnig HR
- Nichol JR
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Common purchaser
- Descriptors
- Brazeau River field
- Common purchaser
- Gas producing
- Gas purchase
- Lease drainage
- Marketing
- NTS 83B
- Reservoir boundary
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S52
- Notes
- ERCB Examiners report no.E81-22 on application No. 810260 for an Order declaring TransCanada Pipelines Limited and Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd. to be common purchasers of gas from the Brazeau River Elkton-Shunda A pool (TP.43-45, R.11-12, W5M).
- Interveners
- Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd.
- CDC Oil & Gas Limited
Decision 81-22
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1986
- Applicant
- C.I.L. Inc.
- Trimac Ltd.
- Application Number
- 800908
- Title
- Decision on application by C.I.L. Inc. and Trimac Ltd., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
- Date
- 1981
- Title
- Decision on application by C.I.L. Inc. and Trimac Ltd., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture polyethylene)
- Date
- 1981
- Applicant
- C.I.L. Inc.
- Trimac Ltd.
- Application Number
- 800908
- Hearing Panel
- Berkowitz N
- Goodman CJ
- Strom NA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Chemical plant
- Edmonton area
- Ethylene homopolymer
- Industrial development permit
- Benefit cost analysis
- Demand (economics)
- Economic analysis
- Ethylene - raw material
- Marketing
- Natural gas - fuel
- NTS 83H
- Socio-economic effect
- Supply (economics)
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- Decision 81-22 on application No. 800908 to use ethylene as feedstock and gas as fuel to manufacture polyethylene in a new plant to be constructed on site of applicant's existing plant site in Edmonton (section 36-52-24 W4M).
- Interveners
- Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
- Esso Chemical of Canada
- Du Pont Canada Inc.
- The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Decision 81-24
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1984
- Applicant
- Union Carbide Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 800889
- Title
- Decision on application by Union Carbide Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene glycol)
- Date
- 1981
- Title
- Decision on application by Union Carbide Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene glycol)
- Date
- 1981
- Applicant
- Union Carbide Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 800889
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Bohme VE
- Goodman CJ
- McAndrews CJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Chemical plant
- Ethylene glycol
- Industrial development permit
- Prentiss area
- Agricultural land
- Conflict
- Demand (economics)
- Economic analysis
- Energy development
- Environmental impact
- Ethylene - raw material
- Land use
- Locating
- Marketing
- Natural gas - fuel
- NTS 83A
- Plant location
- Socio-economic effect
- Supply (economics)
- Water supply
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- Decision 81-24 on application No. 800889 to use ethylene as feedstock and gas as fuel to produce ethylene glycol in a new plant to be constructed near Prentiss (section 30-39-25 W4M); Board hearing 1981-04-14/15/16/20/21
- Interveners
- Preserve Agricultural Land
- Craigievar Farms
- Unifarm
- Christian Farmers Federation
- Red Deer Board of the Alberta Institute of Agrologists
- Superior Sod Farms
- F.E.M. Farms Ltd.
- Carlyle, R.J.
- Friesen, G.
- Hainsworth, J.W.
- Russell, M.
- Russell, E.
- Low, D.C.
- Chessor, D.
- Sather, A.P.
- Red Deer River Regional Planning Commission
- Buffalo Lake Regional Resources Project
- Alix Chamber of Commerce
- Village of Mirror
- Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
- Esso Chemical Canada
- Du Pont Canada Inc.
- Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
- NOVA, AN ALBERTA CORPORATION
- Shell Canada Limited
Decision 81-28
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1980
- Applicant
- Celanese Canada Inc.
- Application Number
- 810535
- Title
- Decision on application by Celanese Canada Inc., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture acetic acid and vinyl acetate monomer)
- Date
- 1981
- Title
- Decision on application by Celanese Canada Inc., 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture acetic acid and vinyl acetate monomer)
- Date
- 1981
- Applicant
- Celanese Canada Inc.
- Application Number
- 810535
- Hearing Panel
- Millard V
- Bohme VE
- Webber HJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Acetic acid
- Chemical plant
- Edmonton area
- Industrial development permit
- Vinyl acetate
- Demand (economics)
- Economic analysis
- Ethylene - raw material
- Marketing
- Methanol
- Natural gas - fuel
- Natural gas - raw material
- NTS 83H
- Raw material
- Socio-economic effect
- Supply (economics)
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- Decision 81-28 on application No. 810535 to use gas as feedstock & fuel and ethylene & methanol as feedstock to manufacture acetic acid & vinyl acetate monomer in a new plant to be constructed on existing Clover Bar site (section 17-53-23 W4M).
- Interveners
- The City of Edmonton
- Dow Chemical of Canada, Inc.
- C-I-L Inc.
- Trimac Ltd.
- Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
- Esso Chemical Canada
- Enesco Chem Ltd.
- The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Decision 82-05
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2073
- Applicant
- Dow Chemical Canada Inc.
- Application Number
- 810042
- 810043
- Title
- Decision on application by Dow Chemical Canada Inc., 1982 (Chlorine and caustic soda plant expansion and ethylene dichloride and vinyl chloride monomer plant expansion)
- Date
- 1982
- Title
- Decision on application by Dow Chemical Canada Inc., 1982 (Chlorine and caustic soda plant expansion and ethylene dichloride and vinyl chloride monomer plant expansion)
- Date
- 1982
- Applicant
- Dow Chemical Canada Inc.
- Application Number
- 810042
- 810043
- Hearing Panel
- Berkowitz N
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Chemical plant
- Chlorine
- Chloroethylene
- Dichloroethane
- Ethylene
- Fort Saskatchewan area
- Industrial development permit
- Sodium hydroxide
- Capitalized cost
- Cost analysis
- Demand (economics)
- Economic analysis
- Environmental impact
- Expansion
- Marketing
- Monitoring
- Natural gas - fuel
- Natural gas - raw material
- NTS 83H
- Revision
- Supply (economics)
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S30
- Notes
- Decision 82-5 on application No. 810042 to amend IDP No. DCC 80-7 for use of additional natural gas as fuel for production of chlorine and caustic soda and No. 810043 for use of ethylene and natural gas as raw material and fuel for production of ethylene facilities to be installed at Dow's existing plane at Fort Saskatchewan (located in sections 2 & 11-55-22 W4M.
- Interveners
- Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
- Esso Chemical Canada
- The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.