16 records – page 1 of 1.

Decision 69-C

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2528
Applicant
Atlantic Richfield Company
Cities Service Athabasca Inc.
Imperial Oil Limited
Royalite Oil Company Limited
Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Application Number
4502
Title
Decision on application by Atlantic Richfield Company, Cities Service Athabasca Inc., Imperial Oil Limited, and Royalite Oil Company Limited, 1969 (to produce synthetic crude oil from the tar sands)
Date
1969
Title
Decision on application by Atlantic Richfield Company, Cities Service Athabasca Inc., Imperial Oil Limited, and Royalite Oil Company Limited, 1969 (to produce synthetic crude oil from the tar sands)
Date
1969
Applicant
Atlantic Richfield Company
Cities Service Athabasca Inc.
Imperial Oil Limited
Royalite Oil Company Limited
Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Application Number
4502
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Manyluk AF
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Athabasca oil sands
Manufactured crude oil
Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Alberta
Producing
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 6A
Notes
ERCB Report 69-C on Application No. 4502 for approval of a scheme of operation for the recovery of synthetic crude oil from oil sands in the bituminous sands area of Alberta; Board Hearing 1969-05-26/27
Less detail

Decision 71-F-OG

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2488
Applicant
Atlantic Richfield Canada Ltd.
Canada-Cities Service Ltd.
Gulf Oil Canada Limited
Imperial Oil Limited
Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Application Number
5849
Title
Decision on application by Atlantic Richfield Canada Ltd., Canada- Cities Service Ltd., Gulf Oil Canada Limited, and Imperial Oil Limited, 1971 (to amend approval 1223 for production of synthetic crude oil under part 8 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act)
Date
1971
Title
Decision on application by Atlantic Richfield Canada Ltd., Canada- Cities Service Ltd., Gulf Oil Canada Limited, and Imperial Oil Limited, 1971 (to amend approval 1223 for production of synthetic crude oil under part 8 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act)
Date
1971
Applicant
Atlantic Richfield Canada Ltd.
Canada-Cities Service Ltd.
Gulf Oil Canada Limited
Imperial Oil Limited
Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Application Number
5849
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Craig DR
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Athabasca oil sands
Oil sands oil recovery
Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Alberta
Mildred Lake
Manufactured crude oil
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 8
Notes
ERCB report 71-F-OG on application No. 5849 to amend approval 1223 to increase production of synthetic crude; granted by approval No. 1725; Board hearing 1971-09-21/22
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision 74-J

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2398
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
N/A
Title
Adequacy of Alberta’s reserves of conventional oil to meet market requirements
Date
1974
Title
Adequacy of Alberta’s reserves of conventional oil to meet market requirements
Date
1974
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
N/A
Hearing Panel
N/A
Hearing Type
N/A
Category
Oil supply
Descriptors
Crude oil demand
Oil reserve
Self-sufficiency
Alberta
Crude oil
Manufactured crude oil
Marketing
Production rate
Less detail

Decision 75-H

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2359
Applicant
Home Oil Company Limited
Alminex Limited
Application Number
7688
Title
Decision on application by Home Oil Company Limited and Alminex Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Part 8)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Home Oil Company Limited and Alminex Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Part 8)
Date
1975
Applicant
Home Oil Company Limited
Alminex Limited
Application Number
7688
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Craig DR
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Athabasca oil sands
Oil mining
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Alberta
Economic analysis
Manufactured crude oil
NTS 74E
Pollution control
Sulphur recovery
Surface mining
Tailings
Oil sands reserve
Waste disposal
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 8
Notes
ERCB report 75-H on application No. 7688 for approval of an oil sands processing plant on lease 30 in TP.94, R.8-11, W4; Board hearing 1974-06-26/27/28
Less detail

Decision 76-11

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2153
Applicant
Alberta Oil Sands Pipeline Ltd.
Application Number
9138
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Oil Sands Pipeline Ltd., 1976 (oil line from Fort McMurray to Edmonton)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Oil Sands Pipeline Ltd., 1976 (oil line from Fort McMurray to Edmonton)
Date
1976
Applicant
Alberta Oil Sands Pipeline Ltd.
Application Number
9138
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Berkowitz N
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Fort McMurray area
Manufactured crude oil
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Mildred Lake project
NTS 74D
NTS 83H
NTS 83I
NTS 83P
Pipeline route
Route selection
Syncrude Canada Ltd.
Transportation corridor
Legal References
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
Decision 76-11 on application No. 9138 to construct an oil line to transport synthetic crude from Syncrude's Mildred Lake plant to the interprovincial pipeline terminal in Edmonton.
Interveners
Albersun Pipeline Ltd.
CU Engineering Limited
Less detail

Decision 79-E

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2340
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
770866
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Section 43 and Coal Conservation Act, Section 27)
Date
1979
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1979 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Section 43 and Coal Conservation Act, Section 27)
Date
1979
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
770866
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Berkowitz N
Bohme VE
Solodzuk W
Isbister WD
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cold Lake area
Cold Lake heavy oil project
Heavy oil project
Steam injection
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Viscous oil recovery
Benefit cost analysis
Bituminous deposit
Coal - fuel
Environmental impact
IL-OG-74-05
Flexicoking
Industrial development permit
Manufactured crude oil
Material balance
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 73L
Recovery factor
Reserve
Socio-economic effect
Upgrading
Waste disposal
Waste water
Water supply
Well spacing
Legal References
Coal Conservation Act S27
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S43
Notes
ERCB Report 79-E on application no. 770866 to produce and upgrade crude bitumen and for an industrial development permit to use coal as a fuel for the project (TP.64-65, R.3-4, W4M); Board hearing 1978-09-05 adjourned to 1978-12-04 through 1978-12-20 and 1979-01-03 through 1979-01-08 and 1979-05-29/30/31; Report 81-C on application (Application no. 800664) to change makeup fuel and ERCB Decision D83-21 for later application (No. 830620) for phased development of the project
Less detail

Decision 80-12

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2027
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
800229
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Limited, 1980 (industrial development permit synthetic crude oil refinery)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Limited, 1980 (industrial development permit synthetic crude oil refinery)
Date
1980
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
800229
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Benzene
Butane
Industrial development permit
Manufactured crude oil
Oil refinery
Pentanes plus
Petroleum product
Propane
Scotford area
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
NTS 83H
Raw material
Socio-economic effect
Oil sands oil
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 80-12 on application No. 800229 to use synthetic crude oil, natural gas liquids & gas to manufacture refinery products, benzene, N-Hexane, propane, butanes & pentanes plus in a new refinery to be constructed near Scotford in TP.55, R.23, W4M and TP.56, R.21, W4M.
Interveners
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Chevron Standard Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Fort Saskatchewan Chamber of Commerce
Gulf Canada Limited
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Imperial Oil Limited
Turbo Resources Limited
Less detail

Decision 80-28

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2011
Applicant
Gulf Canada Limited
Application Number
800593
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Limited, 1980 (amendment to industrial development permit GOC 78-2 to expand Stratcona refinery)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Limited, 1980 (amendment to industrial development permit GOC 78-2 to expand Stratcona refinery)
Date
1980
Applicant
Gulf Canada Limited
Application Number
800593
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Butane
Edmonton area
Industrial development permit
Oil refinery
Petroleum product
Propane
Demand (economics)
Expansion
Manufactured crude oil
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 83H
Pentanes plus
Raw material
Socio-economic effect
Supply (economics)
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 80-28 on application No. 800593 to amend existing IDP GOC 78-2 to expand Gulf Strathcona refinery and use crude oil, butanes, pentanes plus and gas as feedstock and fuel in the production of refinery products, propane and butanes; Board hearing 1980-10-28/29
Interveners
Chevron Canada Liimited
Husky Oil Operations Lt.d
Imperial Oil Limited
Turbo Resources Limited
Less detail

Decision 80-29

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2010
Applicant
Imperial Oil Limited
Application Number
800513
Title
Decision on application by Imperial Oil Limited, 1980 (amendment to industrial development permit IOL 79-1 to expand Strathcona refinery)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Imperial Oil Limited, 1980 (amendment to industrial development permit IOL 79-1 to expand Strathcona refinery)
Date
1980
Applicant
Imperial Oil Limited
Application Number
800513
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Asphalt
Butane
Edmonton area
Industrial development permit
Oil refinery
Petroleum product
Propane
Bitumen
Expansion
Manufactured crude oil
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 83H
Raw material
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 80-29 on application No. 800513 to amend IDP IOL 79-1 to expand Imperial's Strathcona refinery and authorize use of additional volumes of crude oil, crude bitumen, butanes and gas as feedstock and fuel in the production of refinery products, propane, butanes and asphalt.
Interveners
Celanese Canada Limited
Chevron Canada Limited
Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
Shell Canada Limited
Turbo Resources Limited
Less detail

Decision 83-E

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2275
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Title
Alberta oil supply, 1983-2007
Date
1983
Title
Alberta oil supply, 1983-2007
Date
1983
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Category
Oil supply
Descriptors
Crude oil supply
Energy data
Enhanced oil recovery
Forecasting
Oil reserve
Producing capacity
Oil sands reserve
Alberta
Bitumen
Crude oil
Manufactured crude oil
Pentanes plus
Oil sands oil
Viscous crude oil
Notes
ERCB report 83-E, updates report 81-B; superseded by ERCB report 85-A
Less detail

Decision 85-A

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1676
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Title
Alberta oil supply 1985-2000
Date
1985

Decision 86-24

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision249
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Alberta Oil Sands Pipeline Ltd.
Application Number
860932
Title
Examiner report on application by Alberta Oil Sands Pipeline Ltd., 1986 (permit to construct a pump station in the Wandering River area)
Date
1986
Title
Examiner report on application by Alberta Oil Sands Pipeline Ltd., 1986 (permit to construct a pump station in the Wandering River area)
Date
1986
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Alberta Oil Sands Pipeline Ltd.
Application Number
860932
Hearing Panel
Evans RG
Jamil K
Remmer WG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Manufactured crude oil
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Pump station
Agricultural land
Capacity
Environmental impact
Erosion
Expansion
Land value
Locating
Noise (sound)
NTS 83P
Oil spill
Pipeline design
Pollution
Soil conservation
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E86-24 on application No. 860932 to construct a 1700-kilowatt pump station in LSD 9 & 10-30-71-16 W4M to increase the capacity of the existing pipeline transporting synthetic crude oil from Syncrude oil sands plant to various Edmonton refineries.
Interveners
Coonan, H.
Coonan, K.
Rebkowich & Sons
Johnson, H.
The Advisory Council to The Improvement District No. 18, South
Trefanenko, A.
Location
09-30-071-16W4
10-30-071-16W4
Less detail

Decision 88-E

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision148
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Title
Alberta oil supply 1988-2003
Date
1988
Title
Alberta oil supply 1988-2003
Date
1988
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Descriptors
Crude oil supply
Economic forecasting
Energy data
Oil reserve
Producing capacity
Alberta
Bitumen
Crude oil
Manufactured crude oil
Pentanes plus
Notes
see also later update to this forecast published as ERCB report 90-A
Less detail

Decision 90-A

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision94
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Title
Alberta oil supply 1990-2004: update of ERCB 88-E
Date
1990
Title
Alberta oil supply 1990-2004: update of ERCB 88-E
Date
1990
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Category
Oil supply
Descriptors
Crude oil supply
Economic forecasting
Energy data
Oil reserve
Producing capacity
Alberta
Bitumen
Crude oil
Manufactured crude oil
Pentanes plus
Notes
ERCB report 90-A updating the oil supply forecasts published in report 88-E
Less detail

Decision 94-B

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Title
Alberta oil supply 1994-2005 : update
Date
1994
Title
Alberta oil supply 1994-2005 : update
Date
1994
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Category
Oil supply
Descriptors
Crude oil supply
Economic forecasting
Energy data
Oil reserve
Producing capacity
Alberta
Bitumen
Crude oil
Manufactured crude oil
Pentanes plus
Notes
ERCB report 94-B updating the oil supply forecasts published in report 88-E and report 90-A
Less detail

Decision 2010-30

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4431
Applicant
Total E&P Canada Limited
Application Number
1551460
Title
Decision 2010-030: Total E&P Canada Ltd. application to construct and operate and oil sands upgrader in Strathcona County
Date
2010
Title
Decision 2010-030: Total E&P Canada Ltd. application to construct and operate and oil sands upgrader in Strathcona County
Date
2010
Applicant
Total E&P Canada Limited
Application Number
1551460
Hearing Panel
Dilay JD
McFadyen D
Watson TL
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Air quality
Environmental impact assessment
Water pipeline
Position (location)
Emission
Health
Emergency response plan
Safety
Surface water
Runoff
North Saskatchewan River
Groundwater
Noise (sound)
Bitumen
Manufactured crude oil
Coke
Sulphur
Vegetation
Soil conservation
Soil pollution
Oil sands
Upgrader
Strathcona County
Fort Saskatchewan area
NTS83H
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S11
Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S53
Water Act S37
Water Act S50
Energy Resources Conservation Act S26
Energy Resources Conservation Act S3
Interveners
Citizens for Responsible Development
Vissher H
Vissher E
Henryk Farms Ltd.
Alexander First Nation
Aux Sable Canada Ltd
North West Upgrading Inc.
Shell Canada Energy
Town of Gibbons
Town of Redwater
Town of Bon Accord
City of Fort Saskatchewan
City of Edmonton
Strathcona County
Sturgeon County
Alberta Industrial Heartland Association
Sturgeon Community Hospital Foundation
Merry R
Olstad R
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
CONDITIONS
The Board conditions TOTAL’s approval to require it to achieve 99.5 per cent sulphur recovery on a calendar quarter-year basis within 6 months of commencing start-up activities.
The Board conditions the approval to require TOTAL to conduct a full-scale emergency response exercise that must be performed during a peak traffic period and include notification and actual or simulated evacuation of affected residents/exercise participants prior to start up of operations.
The Board conditions the approval to require TOTAL to submit in its site-specific ERP, an assessment of all hazards, including an H2S release, and appropriate responses based on the particular hazard for the Board’s review and approval following completion of detailed engineering and design, and its full-scale emergency response exercise.
The Board conditions the approval to require TOTAL to submit a revised NIA, prepared in accordance with the requirements of Directive 038, six months prior to starting construction.
The Board conditions the approval to require TOTAL to redo its baseline sound monitoring surveys, in accordance with the requirements of Directive 038, which will include the simultaneous measurement of the A-weighted and C-weighted sound levels in 1/3 octave band values.
The Board conditions TOTAL’s approval to require TOTAL to conduct the post-commissioning sound monitoring survey three months after start-up to verify compliance with the requirements of Directive 038.
The Board conditions the approval to expire on December 31, 2016, unless TOTAL satisfies the Board by no later than October 1, 2016, that construction has commenced or unless the Board stipulates a later date.
Location
xx-17-055-21W4
xx-18-055-21W4
xx-19-055-21W4
xx-20-055-21W4
xx-24-055-22W4
xx-25-055-22W4
xx-36-055-22W4
Less detail

16 records – page 1 of 1.