15 records – page 1 of 1.

Decision 81-09

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1758
Applicant
Panther Resources Ltd.
Application Number
800651
Title
Examiners report on application by Panther Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas processing plant)
Date
1981
Title
Examiners report on application by Panther Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas processing plant)
Date
1981
Applicant
Panther Resources Ltd.
Application Number
800651
Hearing Panel
Evans RG
Pearson DG
Remmer WG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Duhamel field
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Acidification
Air quality
Economic analysis
Emission
Environmental impact
Flare
Hydrogen sulphide removal
Livestock
Locating
Monitoring
NTS 83A
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
ERCB Examiners report No. E81-9 on application No. 800651 to construct and operate a sour gas processing plant southwest of Camrose in LSD 5-31-45-20 W4M; Examiners' hearing 81-01-15 adjourned to 81-03-17/18/19
Interveners
City of Camrose
County of Camrose No.22
Cordes, K.
Calvin, G.
Noden, D.
Luz, W.
Klapstein, W.
Sauer, J.
Sauer, K.
Weyhausen, H.
Weyga Farming Ltd.
Watterodt, T.
Watterodt, W.
Watterodt, M.
Schroeder, D.
Schroeder, K.
Schroeder, P.
Schroeder, H.
Graefin Von Helldorf, V.
Schroeser, I.
Baumgarten, E.
Braim, B.
Krangnes, D.
Snider, R.
Tate, R.
Less detail

Decision 81-25

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1983
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
810147
810395
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited and Elvestad (Rodney and Linda), 1981 (Licence to drill a well and special drilling spacing units)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited and Elvestad (Rodney and Linda), 1981 (Licence to drill a well and special drilling spacing units)
Date
1981
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
810147
810395
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Bohme VE
Warne GA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Spacing
Descriptors
Drilling spacing unit
Valhalla field
Well licence
Agricultural land
Directional drilling
Economic analysis
Decision D1981-20
Exploratory well
Livestock
Locating
NTS 83M
Off target penalty
Target area
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.030
Notes
Decision 81-25 on application No. 810147 to drill a well in LSD 16-30-74-9 W6M to obtain production from the Halfway FM and No. 810395 to change gas target area in TP.74, R.9-10, W6M.
Interveners
Elvestad, R.
Elvestad, L.
Total Petroleum Limited
Approval
Denied
Less detail

Decision 82-21

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2057
Applicant
Inverness Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
810434
820033
Title
Decision on application by Inverness Petroleum Ltd., 1982 (approval of a gas processing plant and related gas gathering facilities in the Silver Valley area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Inverness Petroleum Ltd., 1982 (approval of a gas processing plant and related gas gathering facilities in the Silver Valley area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Inverness Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
810434
820033
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Gas processing plant
Gathering line
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Agricultural land
Air quality
Deposition
Emission
Environment protection
Environmental impact
Flare
Health
Livestock
Mathematical model
NTS 84D
Safety
Selenium
Soil analysis
Sulphur dioxide
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 82-21 on application No. 810434 to construct a gas plant in LSD 13-27-81-11 W6M and on application No. 820033 for related gas gathering and pipeline facilities; Board hearing 1982-03-22/23
Interveners
Josephine Environmental Protection Group
Rehaume AB
Umbach JE
Scobel K
Baxter DM
Travis KR
Phillips BM
Weiss K
Brown HD
Harpe R
Nagel H
National Farmers Union
Staton ME
Hendricks J
Johnstone AH
Alberta Environment
Liu CS
Defir J
Graveland D
Less detail

Decision 82-D

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2313
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
810520
810092
Title
Sour gas processing in Alberta : a review of evidence presented at recent ERCB hearings respecting the impacts and surveillance of sour gas plants
Date
1982
Title
Sour gas processing in Alberta : a review of evidence presented at recent ERCB hearings respecting the impacts and surveillance of sour gas plants
Date
1982
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
810520
810092
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Air pollution
Emission
Environmental impact
Gas processing
Nitrogen oxide
Soil pollution
Sour gas
Sulphur
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur dioxide removal
Sulphur recovery
Water pollution
Acidification
Airborne waste
Alberta
Deposition
Exhaust gas
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
Injection
Livestock
Monitoring
Selenium
Trace element
Underground
Waste disposal
Notes
ERCB report 82-D arising from hearing to consider application for sour gas processing at Jumping Pound and Quirk Creek gas plants and pipeline to connect Moose and Whiskey sour gas reserves to Quirk Creek plant. for Decisions on these applications see ERCB Decisions 82-3, 82-12 and report 82-E
Less detail

Decision 83-13

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2330
Applicant
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
820346
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., 1983 (Okotoks sour gas processing plant)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., 1983 (Okotoks sour gas processing plant)
Date
1983
Applicant
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
820346
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Bohme VE
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Conflict
Gas processing plant
Mazeppa gas plant
Okotoks field
Sour gas
Benefit cost analysis
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
ID-81-03
IL-80-24
Gas reserve
Health
Livestock
Locating
NTS 82I
Plant location
Safety
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Water supply
Water use
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision no.D83-13 on application No. 820346 for sour gas processing plant in the Mazeppa area of Okotoks field in section 3-20-28 W4M or section 35-19-28 W4M; see also Decision D83-12 on related proceeding No. 821137 (public inquiry to consider potential conflicts between development of sour gas reserves and residential development in the Okotoks area);Board hearing 1983-04-11/12/13/14/15/18
Interveners
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Committee for Toxic Pollutant Controls
Goldenview Farms Ltd.
Pan-Alberta Gas Ltd.
Rio Frio Ranch Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 84-07

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1168
Applicant
Dekalb Petroleum Corporation
Application Number
830880
Title
Examiners report on application by Dekalb Petroleum Corporation, 1984 (application for approval of a gas processing plant Willesden Green field)
Date
1984
Title
Examiners report on application by Dekalb Petroleum Corporation, 1984 (application for approval of a gas processing plant Willesden Green field)
Date
1984
Applicant
Dekalb Petroleum Corporation
Application Number
830880
Hearing Panel
Bray JA
Mazurek LA
Dilay JD
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Willesden Green field
Agricultural land
Air quality
Dissolved gas
Environmental impact
Flare
Gas conservation
Livestock
Locating
NTS 83B
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E84-7 on application No. 830880 for approval to construct and operate a sweet gas processing plant at an existing multi-well oil battery located in LSD 2-36-40-7 W5M.
Interveners
O'Connor, E.
O'Connor, R.
Less detail

Decision 84-B

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1695
Applicant
East Claresholm Clean Air Association
Title
Public meeting to consider concerns regarding an uncontrolled flow of sour gas and the operation of a sour gas plant in the Claresholm area
Date
1984
Title
Public meeting to consider concerns regarding an uncontrolled flow of sour gas and the operation of a sour gas plant in the Claresholm area
Date
1984
Applicant
East Claresholm Clean Air Association
Hearing Panel
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Inquiry
Descriptors
Air pollution
Blowout (well)
Blowout control
Claresholm area
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Air quality
Blowout preventer
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Evacuation
Gas well
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
Livestock
Monitoring
NTS 82H
NTS 82I
Planning
Safety
Soil analysis
Notes
Report on a public meeting regarding the sour gas well blowout (Drummond et al Claresholm 6-30-12-25 W4M) and ongoing concerns over the operation of the Claresholm sour gas processing plant located in the SW quarter of section 30-12-25 W4M; public meeting 1984-11-08
Less detail

Decision 90-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision96
Applicant
Chesapeake Resources Ltd.
Application Number
891846
Title
Decision 90-03 : Chesapeake Resources Ltd.: Application for a well licence, Whitemud area
Date
1990
Title
Decision 90-03 : Chesapeake Resources Ltd.: Application for a well licence, Whitemud area
Date
1990
Applicant
Chesapeake Resources Ltd.
Application Number
891846
Hearing Panel
Prince JP
Bietz BF
Dilay JD
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Well licence
Whitemud field
Directional drilling
Ellerslie member
Environmental impact
Gas producing
Livestock
Locating
Noise (sound)
NTS 83H
Oil producing
Urban development
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
Decision D90-3 on application No. 891846 to drill a well in LSD 16-12-51-25 W4M to obtain oil or gas production from the Ellerslie formation; Board hearing held 1990-03-28/29/30
Interveners
Royal Canadian Alpaca Ranch
Sabo, L.
Sabo, E
Bevilacqua, M.
Location
16-12-051-25W4
Less detail

Decision 93-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision18
Applicant
Skinner (Simon and Michael)
Amax Petroleum of Canada Inc.
Application Number
910526
910289
910790
910972
910890
910891
910892
910893
910894
910895
910896
910897
910898
910899
910900
910901
910902
910903
910904
910905
Title
Decision 93-03 : Simon and Michael Skinner and Amax Petroleum of Canada Inc.: Applications for review or development of facilities, wells, spacing order and holdings Hayter field, Provost area
Date
1993
Title
Decision 93-03 : Simon and Michael Skinner and Amax Petroleum of Canada Inc.: Applications for review or development of facilities, wells, spacing order and holdings Hayter field, Provost area
Date
1993
Applicant
Skinner (Simon and Michael)
Amax Petroleum of Canada Inc.
Application Number
910526
910289
910790
910972
910890
910891
910892
910893
910894
910895
910896
910897
910898
910899
910900
910901
910902
910903
910904
910905
Hearing Panel
Mink FJ
Bietz BF
Berndtsson NG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Production facility
Spacing
Well licence
Descriptors
Hayter field
Pipeline construction permit
Producing equipment
Provost area
Well licence
Battery
Cattle
Dina member
Emission
Environmental impact
Livestock
Mannville Gp
Oil producing
Socio-economic effect
Sour crude
NTS 73D
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S42
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S71
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S5.190
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
Notes
ERCB decision D93-3 on application no. 910526 by Simon and Michael Skinner for a review of wells, facilities and spacing order and on applications no. 910289, 910790, 910972 and 910890-910905 inclusive by Amax Petroleum for holdings, spacing order, wells and facilities all in the Hayter Field in the Provost area; Board hearing 1992-01-13 to 17, 1992-01-27 to 31, 1992-02-24 to 28, 1992-04-13/14/21 to 24 , 1992-05-04-06
Interveners
Alberta Environmental Centre
Alberta Cattle Commission
Christian Farmers Federation of Alberta
Shell Caroline Agricultural Society
Taylor, N.
Bocock, W.E.
Less detail

Decision 93-03 Addendum (97/01/13)

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2608
Applicant
Anderson Oil and Gas Inc.
Skinner (Simon and Michael)
Application Number
1003897
Title
Decision 93-03 Addendum : Anderson Oil & Gas Inc.: Application to suspend Clause 5, Subclause (B) of Decision D93-03 Simon and Michael Skinner Hayter Field, Provost Area)
Date
1997
Title
Decision 93-03 Addendum : Anderson Oil & Gas Inc.: Application to suspend Clause 5, Subclause (B) of Decision D93-03 Simon and Michael Skinner Hayter Field, Provost Area)
Date
1997
Applicant
Anderson Oil and Gas Inc.
Skinner (Simon and Michael)
Application Number
1003897
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Production facility
Descriptors
Battery
Hayter field
Provost area
Abandonment
Cattle
Environmental impact
Livestock
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S42
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Addendum to Decision D93-3 on application to waive requirements of Decision D93-3. Decision D93-3 on application no. 910526 by Simon and Michael Skinner contained a number of directions including clause 5, subclause (B). This clause required the nine wells located in the Skinners pasture to be abandoned and site reclamation started by 2 March 1997. Anderson, the current licensee applied to have the requirements of clause 5, subclause (B) of Decision D93-3 waived, with the agreement of the Skinners.
Less detail

Decision 98-09

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2924
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
970451
Title
Decision 98-09 : Shell Canada Limited : Application for a well licence, Quirk Creek field
Date
1998
Title
Decision 98-09 : Shell Canada Limited : Application for a well licence, Quirk Creek field
Date
1998
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
970451
Hearing Panel
McManus BT
Rahnama F
Vrskovy MJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Environmental impact
Gas producing
Kananaskis area
Land use
Land value
Livestock
NTS 82J
Quirk Creek field
Recreational facility
Regional planning
Rural development
Sour gas
Well licence
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Energy Resources Conservation Act S29
Notes
EUB Decision D98-09 on application no. 970451 for a well licence to drill a deviated well from surface location in Lsd 7 Sec 19 Twp 21 Rge 4 W5M to obtain gas production from the Turner Valley Fm; Square Butte Ranches Ltd. filed an objection.
Interveners
Square Butte Ranches Ltd.
Gibb M
Approval
Approved
Approved with conditions
Conditions
Shell shall retain a third-party environmental inspector at all times prior to and during drilling
Inspector shall prepare a report documenting development activities, impacts, and mitigative measures
Access road into Kananaskis Country to be controlled by Shell
Reclamation shall be discussed with Alberta Forest Service and AEP
Temorary work space shall be located to reduce the need for additional clearing
Shell shall use above-ground tanks for waste management
Shell shall not exceed seven days of well testing
Shell shall provide seven days notice of flaring with well testing, and 72 hours notice during maintenance
Location
07-19-021-04W5
Less detail

Decision 2010-22

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4423
Applicant
Petro-Canada
Application Number
1517168
1517170
1574414
1574366
1574409
1517148
1520922
1517151
1520923
1517160
1517176
1520388
1513051
Title
Decision 2010-022: Petro-Canada applications for eleven well licences, one multiwell gas battery licence, and two pipeline licences Sullivan Field
Date
2010
Title
Decision 2010-022: Petro-Canada applications for eleven well licences, one multiwell gas battery licence, and two pipeline licences Sullivan Field
Date
2010
Applicant
Petro-Canada
Application Number
1517168
1517170
1574414
1574366
1574409
1517148
1520922
1517151
1520923
1517160
1517176
1520388
1513051
Hearing Panel
Dilay GW
McManus BT
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Pipelines
Descriptors
Battery
Community relations
Copyright
Emergency procedure
Pipeline
NTS 82J
Decision D2008-29
Fescue
Grazing
Socio-economic effect
Site survey
Risk
SullivanField
Well licence
Safety
Environment
Health
Livestock
Environmental impact assessment
Land use
Air quality
Water quality
Range grass
Vegetation
Grass
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
Prehearing meeting was held in Longview on March 18, 2008
Interveners
Big Loop Group
Stoney Nakoda Nation
Pekisko Group
Royal Adderson and Bad Ad Ranches Ltd.
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
See Appendix 1 (p. 113 - 147) Summary of conditions and commitments
Location
12-11-018-05W5
Less detail

Decision 2013-18

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4516
Application Number
1769924
Title
Decision 2013-018 : Proceeding into odours and emissions in the Peace River area : organizational meeting report
Date
2013
Title
Decision 2013-018 : Proceeding into odours and emissions in the Peace River area : organizational meeting report
Date
2013
Application Number
1769924
Hearing Panel
McManus BT
Macken C
Engen T
Hearing Type
Board
Descriptors
Odor
Emission
Peace River area
Three Creeks area
Reno area
Seal Lake area
Heavy oil project
Recommendation
Impact
Impact assessment
Health
Transportation corridor
Vegetation
Livestock
Farm crop
Safety
Freedom of information
Monitoring
Evaluation
Vapor
Noise (sound)
Environmental impact
Soil pollution
Water pollution
Air pollution
Gas flaring
Combustion
Air quality
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Responsible Energy Development Act (REDA) D17
AER Rules of Practice
2013 ABAER 018
Notes
Change to legal citation effective January 2011
Approval
No approval required
Less detail

Decision 2014-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4524
Application Number
1769924
Title
Decision 2014-005 : Report of recommendations on odours and emissions in the Peace River area
Date
2014
Title
Decision 2014-005 : Report of recommendations on odours and emissions in the Peace River area
Date
2014
Application Number
1769924
Hearing Panel
McManus BT
Macken C
Engen T
McManus RC
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Environment/Pollution
Descriptors
Odor
Emission
Peace River area
Heavy oil project
Recommendation
Impact
Impact assessment
Health
Transportation corridor
Vegetation
Livestock
Farm crop
Safety
Freedom of information
Monitoring
Evaluation
Vapor
Noise (sound)
Environmental impact
Soil pollution
Water pollution
Air pollution
Gas flaring
Combustion
Air quality
Socio-economic effect
Decision 2013-018
DIR 060
Three Creeks area
Reno area
Seal Lake area
Legal References
Responsible Energy Development Act (REDA) D17
AER Rules of Practice
2014 ABAER 005
Notes
Change to legal citation effective January 2011
Approval
No approval required
Less detail

Decision E59-(p.120)

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision511
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Title
Examiners report on inquiry into Bashaw north Camrose No. 6-10 well, 1959
Date
1959
Title
Examiners report on inquiry into Bashaw north Camrose No. 6-10 well, 1959
Date
1959
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Hearing Panel
King RH
Macleod NA
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Inquiry
Descriptors
Environmental impact
Livestock
Inquiry
Containment
Oil spill
Oil waste
Pollution control
Notes
Examiners report on inquiry into landowner's complaint about oily refuse and water contamination of livestock occupied lands; first offense by operator; Examiners recommend that operator be strongly warned, but that no action be taken at this time.
Less detail

15 records – page 1 of 1.