Narrow Results By
Decision 88-04
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision183
- Applicant
- Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
- Application Number
- 871530
- Title
- Examiner report on application by Husky Oil Operations Limited, 1988 (well site access road review)
- Date
- 1988
- Title
- Examiner report on application by Husky Oil Operations Limited, 1988 (well site access road review)
- Date
- 1988
- Applicant
- Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
- Application Number
- 871530
- Hearing Panel
- Homeniuk TF
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Production facility
- Descriptors
- Well licence
- Well site
- Accident
- Grazing land
- Liability (Law)
- NTS 73E
- Road construction
- Safety
- Legal References
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S42
- Notes
- ERCB Examiners report E88-04 on application No. 871530 for a review of the licences governing access to wells located in LSD 3,5,13 of section 3, TP.52, R.4 W4M; Examiners meeting held 1988-01-06
- Location
- 03-03-052-04W4
- 05-03-052-04W4
- 13-03-052-04W4
Decision 2000-51
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3232
- Applicant
- South Alberta Energy Corporation
- Justice G
- 693040 Alberta Limited
- Dame M
- Application Number
- 980654
- 980655
- Title
- Decision 2000-51: South Alberta Energy Corp., Greg Justice, 693040 Alberta Ltd., and Marc Dame review of abandonment costs, Order No. ACO 98-1
- Date
- 2000
- Title
- Decision 2000-51: South Alberta Energy Corp., Greg Justice, 693040 Alberta Ltd., and Marc Dame review of abandonment costs, Order No. ACO 98-1
- Date
- 2000
- Application Number
- 980654
- 980655
- Hearing Panel
- Bietz BF
- McGee TM
- Bruni MJ
- Hearing Type
- Board initiated
- Category
- Abandonment
- Descriptors
- Abandonment
- Cost analysis
- Finance
- Liability (Law)
- Regulation
- Well licence
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S20
- Notes
- Decision D2000-51 re Board-Initiated Proceedings No. 980654 and 980655 re abandonment monies owed by named parties to EUB.
- Interveners
- South Alberta Energy Corp.
- Justice G
- 690340 Alberta Ltd.
- Dame M
- Mudie M
- Approval
- Approved
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- The Board finds that Mr. Greg Justice was the person in actual control of SAEC at the time of issuance of ACO 98-1; it also finds that 693040 Alberta Ltd. and Mr. Mark Dame be struck from Abandonment Costs Order 98-1.
Decision 2000-77
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3319
- Applicant
- ATCO Electric Limited
- Application Number
- 2000293
- file no. 5600-15
- Title
- Decision 2000-77 : ATCO Electric Ltd application for approval of transfer of generation assets
- Date
- 2000
- Title
- Decision 2000-77 : ATCO Electric Ltd application for approval of transfer of generation assets
- Date
- 2000
- Applicant
- ATCO Electric Limited
- Application Number
- 2000293
- file no. 5600-15
- Hearing Panel
- McManus BT
- Miller GJ
- Heggie RD
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Utilities
- Category
- Legal changes
- Descriptors
- Sale of assets
- Liability (Law)
- Legal References
- Public Utilities Board Act S91
- Notes
- Application for the sale of interconnected generating units to Alberta Power 2000 Ltd. for greater efficiency of regulated vs. unregulated business; Board approved transfer on condition that further information regarding value of environmental liabilities and impact on deferred income taxes are provided to the satisfaction of the Board
- Approval
- Approved
- Conditions
- Values of assets and liabilities
- Impact on deferred income taxes
- Actual income tax elections and supporting schedules
Decision 2001-72
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3398
- Applicant
- ATCO Electric Limited
- Application Number
- 2000293
- file no. 5600-15
- Title
- Decision 2001-72 : ATCO Electric Ltd application for approval of transfer of generation assets
- Date
- 2001
- Title
- Decision 2001-72 : ATCO Electric Ltd application for approval of transfer of generation assets
- Date
- 2001
- Applicant
- ATCO Electric Limited
- Application Number
- 2000293
- file no. 5600-15
- Hearing Panel
- McManus BT
- Miller GJ
- Heggie RD
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Utilities
- Category
- Legal changes
- Descriptors
- Sale of assets
- Liability (Law)
- Legal References
- Public Utilities Board Act S91
- Notes
- Application for the sale of interconnected generating units to Alberta Power 2000 Ltd. for greater efficiency of regulated vs. unregulated business; Board approved transfer on condition that further information regarding value of environmental liabilities and impact on deferred income taxes are provided to the satisfaction of the Board
- Approval
- Approved
- Conditions
- Values of assets and liabilities
- Impact on deferred income taxes
- Actual income tax elections and supporting schedules
Decision 2002-53
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3513
- Applicant
- Prince Resource Corporation
- Yu R
- Macovichuk B
- Mak D
- Yu P
- Application Number
- 2000231
- Title
- Decision 2002-53: Prince Resource Corporation, Richard Yu review of abandonment costs order no. ACO 2000-1
- Date
- 2002
- Title
- Decision 2002-53: Prince Resource Corporation, Richard Yu review of abandonment costs order no. ACO 2000-1
- Date
- 2002
- Applicant
- Prince Resource Corporation
- Yu R
- Macovichuk B
- Mak D
- Yu P
- Application Number
- 2000231
- Hearing Panel
- McGee TM
- Bruni MJ
- Sharp KG
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Abandonment
- Descriptors
- Abandonment
- Cost analysis
- Finance
- Liability (Law)
- NTS 83N
- NTS 83O
- Regulation
- Well licence
- Legal References
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S43
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act
- Notes
- Corporate Compliance Group of the EUB issued Abandonment Costs Orders to Prince Resources, Richard Yu et al to pay abandonment costs totalling 374,717.87 for three wells. ACO 2000-1 included a 25 percent penalty and GST. The applicants requested a review of this order and the Board found that Prince was at all times the licensee and 100 percent working interest participant in the wells and that it was properly named in the order. The Board also found that Richard Yu was at all times a person in control of Prince and was properly named in the order.
- Interveners
- Prince Resources Corporation
- Monaghan F
- Pacholko R
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- The Board directs CCG to rescind ACO 2000-1 and issue a new Abandonment Costs Order naming Prince Resource Corporation Ltd. and Mr. Richard Yu. Should they fail to pay the sum listed in the abandonment costs within 30 days of its receipt, the Board further directs CCG to amend that order to include the 25 per cent penalty provided for in subsection 20.3(3).
Decision 2003-56
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3759
- Applicant
- ATCO Electric Limited
- Application Number
- 1253174
- File No. 5600-20-5
- Title
- Decision 2003-56: ATCO Electric Ltd. review & variance of EUB Decision 2001-082 regarding Generation Reserve Account for Injuries and Damages (GRID)
- Date
- 2003
- Title
- Decision 2003-56: ATCO Electric Ltd. review & variance of EUB Decision 2001-082 regarding Generation Reserve Account for Injuries and Damages (GRID)
- Date
- 2003
- Applicant
- ATCO Electric Limited
- Application Number
- 1253174
- File No. 5600-20-5
- Hearing Panel
- McManus BT
- Douglas JI
- Edwards MW
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Utilities
- Descriptors
- Cost of service
- Decision D2001-082
- Electric power failure
- Electric power supply
- Generation Reserve Account for Injuries and Damages (GRID)
- Liability (Law)
- Outage
- Transmission loss
- Notes
- EUB decision on an application by ATCO Electric requesting final disposition of its December 31, 2001 deferral account balance in its GRID and a true up of other adjustments relating to incidents that were not included in previous applications. In it the Board determines that ATCO request a one-time payment from the Balancing Pool in the amount of 2,716,00.
- Approval
- Approved
Decision 2003-109
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3811
- Applicant
- Alberta Electric System Operator
- Application Number
- 1306252
- File No. 1808-1-1
- Title
- Decision 2003-109: Alberta Electric System Operator 2003 general tariff application – liability protection Part B: Board determinations and recommendations
- Date
- 2003
- Title
- Decision 2003-109: Alberta Electric System Operator 2003 general tariff application – liability protection Part B: Board determinations and recommendations
- Date
- 2003
- Applicant
- Alberta Electric System Operator
- Application Number
- 1306252
- File No. 1808-1-1
- Hearing Panel
- Berg AJ
- Lock RG
- Nichol JR
- Hearing Type
- Utilities
- Category
- Electric power rate
- Interveners
- Industrial Power Consumers Association of Alberta
- City of Lethbridge
- City of Red Deer
- The FIRM Group
- Alberta Federation of REAs
- Alberta Urban Municipalities Association
- Public Institutional Consumers of Alberta
- Consumers' Coalition of Alberta
- Albert Irrigation Projects Association
- Alberta Association of Municipal Districts and Counties
- ATCO Electric
- ATCO Power
- Altalink
- ASTC Partnership
- City of Medicine Hat
- Enmax Power Corporation
- Enmax Energy Coproration
- Epcor Utilities Inc.
- Independent Power Producers Society of Alberta
- TransAlta Corporation
- Watt-Ex Exchange
- Approval
- Approved
Decision 2011-05
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4445
- Applicant
- Total E&P Limited
- Application Number
- 1445535
- Title
- Decision 2011-005 : Total E&P Joslyn Ltd. application for an oil sands mine and bitumen processing facility Joslyn North mine project Fort McMurray area
- Date
- 2011
- Title
- Decision 2011-005 : Total E&P Joslyn Ltd. application for an oil sands mine and bitumen processing facility Joslyn North mine project Fort McMurray area
- Date
- 2011
- Applicant
- Total E&P Limited
- Application Number
- 1445535
- Hearing Panel
- Dilay JD
- Ross B
- McFadyen D
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Bitumen
- Oil sands
- Directive 074
- Environmental impact assessment
- Conservation
- Environmental impact
- Wildlife
- Vegetation
- Wetland
- Water
- Fish
- History
- Paleontology
- Land use
- Socio-economic effect
- Economic development
- Noise (sound)
- Reclamation
- Liability (law)
- Tailings - storage
- Settling pond
- Residential building
- Public consultation
- Cumulative impact assessment
- Legal References
- 2011 ABERCB 005
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S3
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S24
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S26
- Oil Sands Conservation Regulation
- Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act
- Water Act
- Energy Resources Conservation Act
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Act
- Notes
- Report of the joint review panel established by the Federal Minister of the Environment and the Energy Resources Conservation Board
- Change to legal citation effective January 2011
- Interveners
- BP Canada Energy Company
- Shell Canada Limited
- Syncrude Canada Limited
- Belanger F member of the Dene Sioux First Nation
- Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo (RMWB)
- Oil Sands Environmental Coalition (OSEC)
- Mikisew Cree First Nation (MCFN)
- Fort McKay First Nation and Metis Nation Local #63 (Fort McKay)
- Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation (ACFN)
- Non-Status Fort McMurray Band Descendents, and Off-Reserve Fort McMurray Band Descendants
- Sierra Club Prairie
- Guertin M
- Clearwater River Band No. 175
- Government of Canada
- Government of Alberta
- Joint Review Panel (Panel) staff
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- Condition 1 – TOTAL will submit a detailed tailings management plan two years before commencement of operations, and TOTAL will clearly demonstrate its ability to meet all requirements of Directive 074. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 2 – TOTAL will devise methods for measuring fines at the project in accordance with Energy Resources Conservation Board requirements. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 3 – TOTAL will notify the Energy Resources Conservation Board in writing of any proposed pilot plants and/or demonstration plants for all technology development at least six months before construction of those facilities begins. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 4 – TOTAL will provide written updates of any previously submitted test reports by no later than February 28 each year, or as otherwise specified by the Energy Resources Conservation Board. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 5 – TOTAL will not exceed three million cubic metres of fluid in the sand beach area sumps. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 6 – One year prior to plant start-up, TOTAL will privide measurement plans to the Energy Resources Conservation Board for review and approval, including process and instrumentation diagrams, metering, sampling methods, analytical methods and, material balance procedures that satisfy Energy Resources Conservation Board measurement requirements. (Section 5.2.2) Condition 7 – TOTAL will not discharge any untreated froth treatment tailings to the tailings disposal area. (Section 5.3.2) Condition 8 – On an annual average basis, TOTAL will limit site-wide solvent losses to not more than four volumes per thousand volumes of bitumen production under any operating conditions. (Section 5.3.2) Condition 9 – On an annual average basis, TOTAL will limit the amount of asphaltene rejection to 10 mass per cent based on bitumen production. (Section 5.4.2) Condition 10 – TOTAL will submit detailed geotechnical designs for all external overburden disposal areas and reclamation stockpiles to the Energy Resources Conservation Board at least six months prior to conducting any field preparation in these areas. (Section 5.5.3) Condition 11 – TOTAL will submit to the Energy Resources Conservation Board, for its review and approval, detailed geotechnical designs and setback distances for critical infrastructure two years prior to site preparation activities for the ore preparation plant pit, the west and southern final pitwall, and for the final pitwall design and assessed setback from the Ells River. (Section 5.5.3) Condition 12 – TOTAL will provide Alberta Environment with a wildlife mitigation plan for approval prior to clearing any vegetation. The plan must achieve no net significant adverse effect on species at risk and deal with mitigating impacts to not only species at risk, but also valued wildlife. (Section 6.1.3) Condition 13 – TOTAL will monitor noise levels at James Grandejambe’s cabin. Should noise levels exceed those outlined in Directive 038, TOTAL will ensure that mitigation measures are implemented and that Directive 038 compliance is met. (Section 9.6.3) Condition 14 – TOTAL will maintain unimpeded access required for stakeholders to areas west of the project until the Moose Lake access management plan, or an equivalent, is implemented. (Section 9.7.3) Condition 15 – TOTAL will actively support and participate in the Cumulative Environmental Management Association and other regional committees to develop and use its strategies to mitigate both development and regional cumulative environmental effects. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 16 – TOTAL will limit the area of disturbance to 5000 hectares or less. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 17 – TOTAL will remove all benching on mine discard structures prior to reclaiming them. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 18 – TOTAL will provide sustainable watershed designs with vegetated watercourses for geotechnical design applications for mine discard structures. Landform watershed designs should be consistent with regionally recognized guidelines for the purpose of erosion management. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 19 – TOTAL will provide an amended mine plan to demonstrate an integrated landform and landscape design for the Canadian Natural Resources Limited – TOTAL common mine boundary to the Energy Resources Conservation Board for approval five years prior to development. The amended plan must include a discussion of the feasibility of filling the trench area between the Joslyn North and Horizon projects with mine discard. The plan must also include a discussion of the alternatives considered by TOTAL. (Section 10.2.3) Condition 20 – TOTAL will submit an annual report to the Energy Resources Conservation Board, starting two years prior to commencing mining operations, that describes its end pit lake research and development efforts for the previous year, and the current plans and timelines for determining the efficacy of its end pit lake within seven years of mine closure. This report will include all of TOTAL’s efforts and contributions with respect to collaboration on the demonstration of a full scale end pit lake. (Section 12.3)
Decision 2011-32
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4471
- Applicant
- Sarg Oils Limited
- Application Number
- 1516389
- Title
- Decision 2011-032 : Sarg Oils Limited review of abandonment orders AD 2006-17, AD 2006-17A, AD 2006-18, AD 2006-19, and AD 2006-20
- Date
- 2011
- Title
- Decision 2011-032 : Sarg Oils Limited review of abandonment orders AD 2006-17, AD 2006-17A, AD 2006-18, AD 2006-19, and AD 2006-20
- Date
- 2011
- Applicant
- Sarg Oils Limited
- Application Number
- 1516389
- Hearing Panel
- Dilay JD
- Bolton AH
- McGee TM
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Abandonment
- Descriptors
- Well
- Pipeline
- Orphan pipeline
- Abandonment
- Reclamation
- Liability (law)
- Orphan facility
- Battery (field facility)
- Legal References
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S26
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S16
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S1.100
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S3.012
- Administrative Procedures and Jurisdiction Act
- Pipeline Act S23
- Pipeline Regulation S82
- Interveners
- Liability Management Group (ERCB)
- Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP)
- Small Explorers and Producers Association of Canada (SEPAC)
- Location
- 05-05-001-16W4
- 10-09-001-17W4
- 12-09-001-17W4
- 04-16-001-17W4
- 03-04-001-16W4
- 04-04-001-16W4