9 records – page 1 of 1.

Decision 88-04

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision183
Applicant
Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
Application Number
871530
Title
Examiner report on application by Husky Oil Operations Limited, 1988 (well site access road review)
Date
1988
Title
Examiner report on application by Husky Oil Operations Limited, 1988 (well site access road review)
Date
1988
Applicant
Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
Application Number
871530
Hearing Panel
Homeniuk TF
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Production facility
Descriptors
Well licence
Well site
Accident
Grazing land
Liability (Law)
NTS 73E
Road construction
Safety
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E88-04 on application No. 871530 for a review of the licences governing access to wells located in LSD 3,5,13 of section 3, TP.52, R.4 W4M; Examiners meeting held 1988-01-06
Location
03-03-052-04W4
05-03-052-04W4
13-03-052-04W4
Less detail

Decision 2000-51

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3232
Applicant
South Alberta Energy Corporation
Justice G
693040 Alberta Limited
Dame M
Application Number
980654
980655
Title
Decision 2000-51: South Alberta Energy Corp., Greg Justice, 693040 Alberta Ltd., and Marc Dame review of abandonment costs, Order No. ACO 98-1
Date
2000
Title
Decision 2000-51: South Alberta Energy Corp., Greg Justice, 693040 Alberta Ltd., and Marc Dame review of abandonment costs, Order No. ACO 98-1
Date
2000
Applicant
South Alberta Energy Corporation
Justice G
693040 Alberta Limited
Dame M
Application Number
980654
980655
Hearing Panel
Bietz BF
McGee TM
Bruni MJ
Hearing Type
Board initiated
Category
Abandonment
Descriptors
Abandonment
Cost analysis
Finance
Liability (Law)
Regulation
Well licence
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S20
Notes
Decision D2000-51 re Board-Initiated Proceedings No. 980654 and 980655 re abandonment monies owed by named parties to EUB.
Interveners
South Alberta Energy Corp.
Justice G
690340 Alberta Ltd.
Dame M
Mudie M
Approval
Approved
Approved with conditions
Conditions
The Board finds that Mr. Greg Justice was the person in actual control of SAEC at the time of issuance of ACO 98-1; it also finds that 693040 Alberta Ltd. and Mr. Mark Dame be struck from Abandonment Costs Order 98-1.
Less detail

Decision 2000-77

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3319
Applicant
ATCO Electric Limited
Application Number
2000293
file no. 5600-15
Title
Decision 2000-77 : ATCO Electric Ltd application for approval of transfer of generation assets
Date
2000
Title
Decision 2000-77 : ATCO Electric Ltd application for approval of transfer of generation assets
Date
2000
Applicant
ATCO Electric Limited
Application Number
2000293
file no. 5600-15
Hearing Panel
McManus BT
Miller GJ
Heggie RD
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Legal changes
Descriptors
Sale of assets
Liability (Law)
Legal References
Public Utilities Board Act S91
Notes
Application for the sale of interconnected generating units to Alberta Power 2000 Ltd. for greater efficiency of regulated vs. unregulated business; Board approved transfer on condition that further information regarding value of environmental liabilities and impact on deferred income taxes are provided to the satisfaction of the Board
Approval
Approved
Conditions
Values of assets and liabilities
Impact on deferred income taxes
Actual income tax elections and supporting schedules
Less detail

Decision 2001-72

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3398
Applicant
ATCO Electric Limited
Application Number
2000293
file no. 5600-15
Title
Decision 2001-72 : ATCO Electric Ltd application for approval of transfer of generation assets
Date
2001
Title
Decision 2001-72 : ATCO Electric Ltd application for approval of transfer of generation assets
Date
2001
Applicant
ATCO Electric Limited
Application Number
2000293
file no. 5600-15
Hearing Panel
McManus BT
Miller GJ
Heggie RD
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Legal changes
Descriptors
Sale of assets
Liability (Law)
Legal References
Public Utilities Board Act S91
Notes
Application for the sale of interconnected generating units to Alberta Power 2000 Ltd. for greater efficiency of regulated vs. unregulated business; Board approved transfer on condition that further information regarding value of environmental liabilities and impact on deferred income taxes are provided to the satisfaction of the Board
Approval
Approved
Conditions
Values of assets and liabilities
Impact on deferred income taxes
Actual income tax elections and supporting schedules
Less detail

Decision 2002-53

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3513
Applicant
Prince Resource Corporation
Yu R
Macovichuk B
Mak D
Yu P
Application Number
2000231
Title
Decision 2002-53: Prince Resource Corporation, Richard Yu review of abandonment costs order no. ACO 2000-1
Date
2002
Title
Decision 2002-53: Prince Resource Corporation, Richard Yu review of abandonment costs order no. ACO 2000-1
Date
2002
Applicant
Prince Resource Corporation
Yu R
Macovichuk B
Mak D
Yu P
Application Number
2000231
Hearing Panel
McGee TM
Bruni MJ
Sharp KG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Abandonment
Descriptors
Abandonment
Cost analysis
Finance
Liability (Law)
NTS 83N
NTS 83O
Regulation
Well licence
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S43
Oil and Gas Conservation Act
Notes
Corporate Compliance Group of the EUB issued Abandonment Costs Orders to Prince Resources, Richard Yu et al to pay abandonment costs totalling 374,717.87 for three wells. ACO 2000-1 included a 25 percent penalty and GST. The applicants requested a review of this order and the Board found that Prince was at all times the licensee and 100 percent working interest participant in the wells and that it was properly named in the order. The Board also found that Richard Yu was at all times a person in control of Prince and was properly named in the order.
Interveners
Prince Resources Corporation
Monaghan F
Pacholko R
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
The Board directs CCG to rescind ACO 2000-1 and issue a new Abandonment Costs Order naming Prince Resource Corporation Ltd. and Mr. Richard Yu. Should they fail to pay the sum listed in the abandonment costs within 30 days of its receipt, the Board further directs CCG to amend that order to include the 25 per cent penalty provided for in subsection 20.3(3).
Less detail

Decision 2003-56

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3759
Applicant
ATCO Electric Limited
Application Number
1253174
File No. 5600-20-5
Title
Decision 2003-56: ATCO Electric Ltd. review & variance of EUB Decision 2001-082 regarding Generation Reserve Account for Injuries and Damages (GRID)
Date
2003
Title
Decision 2003-56: ATCO Electric Ltd. review & variance of EUB Decision 2001-082 regarding Generation Reserve Account for Injuries and Damages (GRID)
Date
2003
Applicant
ATCO Electric Limited
Application Number
1253174
File No. 5600-20-5
Hearing Panel
McManus BT
Douglas JI
Edwards MW
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Descriptors
Cost of service
Decision D2001-082
Electric power failure
Electric power supply
Generation Reserve Account for Injuries and Damages (GRID)
Liability (Law)
Outage
Transmission loss
Notes
EUB decision on an application by ATCO Electric requesting final disposition of its December 31, 2001 deferral account balance in its GRID and a true up of other adjustments relating to incidents that were not included in previous applications. In it the Board determines that ATCO request a one-time payment from the Balancing Pool in the amount of 2,716,00.
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision 2003-109

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3811
Applicant
Alberta Electric System Operator
Application Number
1306252
File No. 1808-1-1
Title
Decision 2003-109: Alberta Electric System Operator 2003 general tariff application – liability protection Part B: Board determinations and recommendations
Date
2003
Title
Decision 2003-109: Alberta Electric System Operator 2003 general tariff application – liability protection Part B: Board determinations and recommendations
Date
2003
Applicant
Alberta Electric System Operator
Application Number
1306252
File No. 1808-1-1
Hearing Panel
Berg AJ
Lock RG
Nichol JR
Hearing Type
Utilities
Category
Electric power rate
Descriptors
General tariff application
Liability Law
Recommendation
Terms and conditions
Interveners
Industrial Power Consumers Association of Alberta
City of Lethbridge
City of Red Deer
The FIRM Group
Alberta Federation of REAs
Alberta Urban Municipalities Association
Public Institutional Consumers of Alberta
Consumers' Coalition of Alberta
Albert Irrigation Projects Association
Alberta Association of Municipal Districts and Counties
ATCO Electric
ATCO Power
Altalink
ASTC Partnership
City of Medicine Hat
Enmax Power Corporation
Enmax Energy Coproration
Epcor Utilities Inc.
Independent Power Producers Society of Alberta
TransAlta Corporation
Watt-Ex Exchange
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision 2011-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4445
Applicant
Total E&P Limited
Application Number
1445535
Title
Decision 2011-005 : Total E&P Joslyn Ltd. application for an oil sands mine and bitumen processing facility Joslyn North mine project Fort McMurray area
Date
2011
Title
Decision 2011-005 : Total E&P Joslyn Ltd. application for an oil sands mine and bitumen processing facility Joslyn North mine project Fort McMurray area
Date
2011
Applicant
Total E&P Limited
Application Number
1445535
Hearing Panel
Dilay JD
Ross B
McFadyen D
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Oil sands oil recovery
Bitumen
Oil sands
Directive 074
Environmental impact assessment
Conservation
Environmental impact
Wildlife
Vegetation
Wetland
Water
Fish
History
Paleontology
Land use
Socio-economic effect
Economic development
Noise (sound)
Reclamation
Liability (law)
Tailings - storage
Settling pond
Residential building
Public consultation
Cumulative impact assessment
Legal References
2011 ABERCB 005
Oil Sands Conservation Act S3
Oil Sands Conservation Act S24
Oil Sands Conservation Act S26
Oil Sands Conservation Regulation
Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act
Water Act
Energy Resources Conservation Act
Canadian Environmental Assessment Act
Notes
Report of the joint review panel established by the Federal Minister of the Environment and the Energy Resources Conservation Board
Change to legal citation effective January 2011
Interveners
BP Canada Energy Company
Shell Canada Limited
Syncrude Canada Limited
Belanger F member of the Dene Sioux First Nation
Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo (RMWB)
Oil Sands Environmental Coalition (OSEC)
Mikisew Cree First Nation (MCFN)
Fort McKay First Nation and Metis Nation Local #63 (Fort McKay)
Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation (ACFN)
Non-Status Fort McMurray Band Descendents, and Off-Reserve Fort McMurray Band Descendants
Sierra Club Prairie
Guertin M
Clearwater River Band No. 175
Government of Canada
Government of Alberta
Joint Review Panel (Panel) staff
Approval
Approved with conditions
Conditions
Condition 1 – TOTAL will submit a detailed tailings management plan two years before commencement of operations, and TOTAL will clearly demonstrate its ability to meet all requirements of Directive 074. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 2 – TOTAL will devise methods for measuring fines at the project in accordance with Energy Resources Conservation Board requirements. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 3 – TOTAL will notify the Energy Resources Conservation Board in writing of any proposed pilot plants and/or demonstration plants for all technology development at least six months before construction of those facilities begins. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 4 – TOTAL will provide written updates of any previously submitted test reports by no later than February 28 each year, or as otherwise specified by the Energy Resources Conservation Board. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 5 – TOTAL will not exceed three million cubic metres of fluid in the sand beach area sumps. (Section 5.1.3) Condition 6 – One year prior to plant start-up, TOTAL will privide measurement plans to the Energy Resources Conservation Board for review and approval, including process and instrumentation diagrams, metering, sampling methods, analytical methods and, material balance procedures that satisfy Energy Resources Conservation Board measurement requirements. (Section 5.2.2) Condition 7 – TOTAL will not discharge any untreated froth treatment tailings to the tailings disposal area. (Section 5.3.2) Condition 8 – On an annual average basis, TOTAL will limit site-wide solvent losses to not more than four volumes per thousand volumes of bitumen production under any operating conditions. (Section 5.3.2) Condition 9 – On an annual average basis, TOTAL will limit the amount of asphaltene rejection to 10 mass per cent based on bitumen production. (Section 5.4.2) Condition 10 – TOTAL will submit detailed geotechnical designs for all external overburden disposal areas and reclamation stockpiles to the Energy Resources Conservation Board at least six months prior to conducting any field preparation in these areas. (Section 5.5.3) Condition 11 – TOTAL will submit to the Energy Resources Conservation Board, for its review and approval, detailed geotechnical designs and setback distances for critical infrastructure two years prior to site preparation activities for the ore preparation plant pit, the west and southern final pitwall, and for the final pitwall design and assessed setback from the Ells River. (Section 5.5.3) Condition 12 – TOTAL will provide Alberta Environment with a wildlife mitigation plan for approval prior to clearing any vegetation. The plan must achieve no net significant adverse effect on species at risk and deal with mitigating impacts to not only species at risk, but also valued wildlife. (Section 6.1.3) Condition 13 – TOTAL will monitor noise levels at James Grandejambe’s cabin. Should noise levels exceed those outlined in Directive 038, TOTAL will ensure that mitigation measures are implemented and that Directive 038 compliance is met. (Section 9.6.3) Condition 14 – TOTAL will maintain unimpeded access required for stakeholders to areas west of the project until the Moose Lake access management plan, or an equivalent, is implemented. (Section 9.7.3) Condition 15 – TOTAL will actively support and participate in the Cumulative Environmental Management Association and other regional committees to develop and use its strategies to mitigate both development and regional cumulative environmental effects. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 16 – TOTAL will limit the area of disturbance to 5000 hectares or less. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 17 – TOTAL will remove all benching on mine discard structures prior to reclaiming them. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 18 – TOTAL will provide sustainable watershed designs with vegetated watercourses for geotechnical design applications for mine discard structures. Landform watershed designs should be consistent with regionally recognized guidelines for the purpose of erosion management. (Section 10.1.3) Condition 19 – TOTAL will provide an amended mine plan to demonstrate an integrated landform and landscape design for the Canadian Natural Resources Limited – TOTAL common mine boundary to the Energy Resources Conservation Board for approval five years prior to development. The amended plan must include a discussion of the feasibility of filling the trench area between the Joslyn North and Horizon projects with mine discard. The plan must also include a discussion of the alternatives considered by TOTAL. (Section 10.2.3) Condition 20 – TOTAL will submit an annual report to the Energy Resources Conservation Board, starting two years prior to commencing mining operations, that describes its end pit lake research and development efforts for the previous year, and the current plans and timelines for determining the efficacy of its end pit lake within seven years of mine closure. This report will include all of TOTAL’s efforts and contributions with respect to collaboration on the demonstration of a full scale end pit lake. (Section 12.3)
Less detail

Decision 2011-32

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4471
Applicant
Sarg Oils Limited
Application Number
1516389
Title
Decision 2011-032 : Sarg Oils Limited review of abandonment orders AD 2006-17, AD 2006-17A, AD 2006-18, AD 2006-19, and AD 2006-20
Date
2011
Title
Decision 2011-032 : Sarg Oils Limited review of abandonment orders AD 2006-17, AD 2006-17A, AD 2006-18, AD 2006-19, and AD 2006-20
Date
2011
Applicant
Sarg Oils Limited
Application Number
1516389
Hearing Panel
Dilay JD
Bolton AH
McGee TM
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Abandonment
Descriptors
Well
Pipeline
Orphan pipeline
Abandonment
Reclamation
Liability (law)
Orphan facility
Battery (field facility)
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S26
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S16
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S1.100
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S3.012
Administrative Procedures and Jurisdiction Act
Pipeline Act S23
Pipeline Regulation S82
Interveners
Liability Management Group (ERCB)
Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP)
Small Explorers and Producers Association of Canada (SEPAC)
Location
05-05-001-16W4
10-09-001-17W4
12-09-001-17W4
04-16-001-17W4
03-04-001-16W4
04-04-001-16W4
Less detail

9 records – page 1 of 1.