7 records – page 1 of 1.

Decision 81-31

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1977
Applicant
Alberta Products Pipe Line Limited
Application Number
810759
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Products Pipe Line Ltd., 1981 (permit to construct segments of a pipeline near Calgary and Leduc)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Products Pipe Line Ltd., 1981 (permit to construct segments of a pipeline near Calgary and Leduc)
Date
1981
Applicant
Alberta Products Pipe Line Limited
Application Number
810759
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Calgary area
Leduc area
Pipeline construction permit
Product pipeline
Energy development
NTS 82P
NTS 83H
Pipeline route
Route selection
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 81-31 on application No. 810759 for consideration of segments of pipeline approved (permit No. 189419) in TP.24-25, R. 28-29, W4M and TP.49-50, R.24-25, W4M see related ERCB Decisions 80-30 and 81-34
Interveners
Cathton Holdings Ltd.
Town of Leduc
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision 82-35|82-35 Addendum

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2044
Applicant
Passburg Petroleums Ltd.
Application Number
820949
Title
Decision on application by Passburg Petroleums Ltd., 1982 (secondary natural gas pipeline Calmar area) (and addendum)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Passburg Petroleums Ltd., 1982 (secondary natural gas pipeline Calmar area) (and addendum)
Date
1982
Applicant
Passburg Petroleums Ltd.
Application Number
820949
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Morin EJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Gathering line
Leduc area
Pipeline construction permit
Deliverability
Gas reserve
Land reclamation
NTS 83H
Pipeline route
Procedure
Route selection
Safety
Urban development
Legal References
Pipeline Act S11
Pipeline Act S15
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 82-35 with addendum on application No. 820949 to construct 2 km of pipeline to transport sweet natural gas from a well in LSD 7-36-49-27 W4M to an existing Passburg pipeline located in LSD 7-35-49-27 W4M.
Interveners
Landstrom Developments Ltd.
Town of Calmar
Less detail

Decision 99-19

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3088
Applicant
Fletcher Challenge Energy Canada Inc.
Application Number
1033164
1033789
Title
Decision 99-19 : Fletcher Challenge Energy Canada Inc. application for an approval to construct a sweet multiwell battery Leduc area
Date
1999
Title
Decision 99-19 : Fletcher Challenge Energy Canada Inc. application for an approval to construct a sweet multiwell battery Leduc area
Date
1999
Applicant
Fletcher Challenge Energy Canada Inc.
Application Number
1033164
1033789
Hearing Panel
Miller GJ
Dunn GC
Houlihan RN
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil production
Descriptors
Battery
Environmental impact
Guide 60
Leduc area
NTS 83H
Locating
Gas flaring
Groundwater
Public consultation
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
Notes
EUB decision D99-19 on applications no. 1033164 and 1033789 by Fletcher Challenge Energy Canada Inc. to construct a sweet multiwell battery located at 11-26-48-26 W4M
Interveners
Loose G
Loose C
Bucsis L
Peter E
Balzer D
Beck B
Capital Health Authority
Dupierry R
Knull G
Faulkner G
Langert H
Labrecque A
Benfeld C
Peden I
Jasper M
Approval
Approved
Approved with conditions
Conditions
Battery design will include vapour recovery unit
Fletcher will finalize agreement with Probe to receive and treat oil emulsion at Probe facility at 13-8-49-25- W4M when ATCO Watelet plant is unable
Lease site will be bermed to prevent surface runoff
Fletcher will test the water wells of residents if requested
Fletcher will address the adequacy of culverts on access road
Fletcher will use electric drive compressors to reduce noise from theh battery
Fletcher will establish committee to address commitments, including the development of an air monitoring program
Location
11-26-048-26W4
Less detail

Decision 2001-111

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3490
Applicant
Epcor Generation Inc.
Epcor Power Development Corpoaration
Application Number
2001173
Title
Decision 2001-111: EPCOR Generation Inc. and EPCOR Power Development Corporation expansion of Genesee power plant
Date
2001
Title
Decision 2001-111: EPCOR Generation Inc. and EPCOR Power Development Corporation expansion of Genesee power plant
Date
2001
Applicant
Epcor Generation Inc.
Epcor Power Development Corpoaration
Application Number
2001173
Hearing Panel
McCrank MN
Lock RG
Miller GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Electric power
Descriptors
Electric power generation
Genesee Power Plant
Coal - fuel
Thermal Power Plant
Leduc area
NTS 83G
Decision D2001-33
Decision D2001-101
Environmental impact
Safety
Air pollution
Fisheries
Water pollution
Wildlife
Noise (sound)
Health
Human factor
Socio-economic effect
Cooling system
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S2
Energy Resources Conservation Act S2
Notes
EUB Decision 2001-111 on application no. 2001173 by EPCOR Generation Inc. and EPCOR Power Development Corporation to construct a 490-megawatt expansion to its existing coal-fired Genesee power plant at Rge 25-50-3 W5M
Interveners
Alberta Environment
Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
Capital Health Authority
Clean Energy Coalition
Department of Fisheries and Oceans
ENMAX Energy Corporation
ENMAX Power Corporation
Enron Canada Corporation
Environment Canada
ESBI Alberta Ltd.
Fording Coal Limited
Hebner Group
Kruger Group (for the local area residents of Genesee)
Mewassin Community Action Group
Paul First Nation
TransAlta Utilities Corporation
TransCanada Energy Limited
Anderson AM
Bernette Ho L
Bird T
Bjorge R
Blackall P
Bodnarek R
Bradford J
Buchwald V
Bull A
Buss K
Cheng L
Chesterman D
Cook S
Cusano LA
Dobko R
Donahue W
Fairbairn M
Forster C
Forster L
Gagner E
Gaspe D
Good Striker D
Griffiths M
Hannaford DJ
Hebner B
Hebner D
Hemstock RN
Hnytka F
Huber HR
Kellerhals M
Kruger D
Lakeman B
Lawrence L
Lawrence S
Legge A
Lloyd D
MacDonald B
Mackenzie A
Mak A
Marr-Laing T
McDonald K
Paul D
Phillips L
Rain O
Rain P
Rain R
Ross G
Sawatsky N
Secord RC
Shores W
Stepaniuk DW
Stubbings
Tyrell H
Valupadas P
Vincent M
Wallace RB
Yanor-McRae R
Approval
Approved
Conditions
The Board expects that EPCOR will adhere to all commitments it made during the consultation process, in the application, and at the hearing on such matters as mitigation, monitoring, and bilateral agreements.
Location
##-25-050-03W5
Less detail

Decision 2016-005

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4522
Applicant
R. and M. Schulze
Application Number
1827949
Title
Decision 2016-005 : R. Schulze and M. Shulze section 33 pipeline removal
Date
2016
Title
Decision 2016-005 : R. Schulze and M. Shulze section 33 pipeline removal
Date
2016
Applicant
R. and M. Schulze
Application Number
1827949
Hearing Type
No Hearing
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Pipeline
Relocation
Leduc area
Leduc-Woodbend field
Land use
Land titles
Environmental impact
Economic analysis
Legal References
Pipeline Act S33
Notes
Change to legal citation effective January 2011
Approval
Withdrawn
Location
06-24-043-05W5
Less detail

Decision E60-(p.285)

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision574
Applicant
Sage Oil Company Limited
Application Number
318
Title
Examiners report on application by Sage Oil Company Limited, 1960 (scheme for the gathering, processing and disposal of gas produced from the well Sage east Leduc 8-5-50-25, in the east Leduc area)
Date
1960
Title
Examiners report on application by Sage Oil Company Limited, 1960 (scheme for the gathering, processing and disposal of gas produced from the well Sage east Leduc 8-5-50-25, in the east Leduc area)
Date
1960
Applicant
Sage Oil Company Limited
Application Number
318
Hearing Panel
Lashuk NJ
Matthews MW
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas gathering
Gas processing
Gas producing
Leduc area
Gas oil ratio
Water oil ratio
Notes
Examiners concluded that the scheme is a reasonable method of producing the hydrocarbons; attempt had been made in the past to produce the well as an oil well but it was shut in due to extremely high GOR's and WOR's
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision E63-(P.191)

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1016
Applicant
Gridoil Freehold Leases Ltd.
Application Number
1630
Title
Examiners report on application by Gridoil Freehold Leases Ltd., 1963 (to establish two legal subdivision oil well spacing units for the Nisku formation in the south Leduc area)
Date
1963
Title
Examiners report on application by Gridoil Freehold Leases Ltd., 1963 (to establish two legal subdivision oil well spacing units for the Nisku formation in the south Leduc area)
Date
1963
Applicant
Gridoil Freehold Leases Ltd.
Application Number
1630
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Spacing
Descriptors
Oil producing
Drilling spacing unit
Nisku Fm
Leduc area
NTS 83H
Notes
Examiners report E63-(P.191) on application No. 1630 for the establishment of two legal subdivision oil well spacing units for the Nisku formation in the South Leduc area.
Approval
Approved
Less detail

7 records – page 1 of 1.