Narrow Results By
Decision 81-31
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1977
- Applicant
- Alberta Products Pipe Line Limited
- Application Number
- 810759
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Products Pipe Line Ltd., 1981 (permit to construct segments of a pipeline near Calgary and Leduc)
- Date
- 1981
- Title
- Decision on application by Alberta Products Pipe Line Ltd., 1981 (permit to construct segments of a pipeline near Calgary and Leduc)
- Date
- 1981
- Applicant
- Alberta Products Pipe Line Limited
- Application Number
- 810759
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Strom NA
- Evans RG
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Pipelines
- Descriptors
- Calgary area
- Leduc area
- Pipeline construction permit
- Product pipeline
- Energy development
- NTS 82P
- NTS 83H
- Pipeline route
- Route selection
- Legal References
- Pipeline Act
- Notes
- Decision 81-31 on application No. 810759 for consideration of segments of pipeline approved (permit No. 189419) in TP.24-25, R. 28-29, W4M and TP.49-50, R.24-25, W4M see related ERCB Decisions 80-30 and 81-34
- Interveners
- Cathton Holdings Ltd.
- Town of Leduc
- Approval
- Approved
Decision 82-35|82-35 Addendum
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2044
- Applicant
- Passburg Petroleums Ltd.
- Application Number
- 820949
- Title
- Decision on application by Passburg Petroleums Ltd., 1982 (secondary natural gas pipeline Calmar area) (and addendum)
- Date
- 1982
- Title
- Decision on application by Passburg Petroleums Ltd., 1982 (secondary natural gas pipeline Calmar area) (and addendum)
- Date
- 1982
- Applicant
- Passburg Petroleums Ltd.
- Application Number
- 820949
- Hearing Panel
- DeSorcy GJ
- Goodman CJ
- Morin EJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Pipelines
- Descriptors
- Gas pipeline
- Gathering line
- Leduc area
- Pipeline construction permit
- Deliverability
- Gas reserve
- Land reclamation
- NTS 83H
- Pipeline route
- Procedure
- Route selection
- Safety
- Urban development
- Legal References
- Pipeline Act S11
- Pipeline Act S15
- Pipeline Act
- Notes
- Decision 82-35 with addendum on application No. 820949 to construct 2 km of pipeline to transport sweet natural gas from a well in LSD 7-36-49-27 W4M to an existing Passburg pipeline located in LSD 7-35-49-27 W4M.
- Interveners
- Landstrom Developments Ltd.
- Town of Calmar
Decision 99-19
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3088
- Applicant
- Fletcher Challenge Energy Canada Inc.
- Application Number
- 1033164
- 1033789
- Title
- Decision 99-19 : Fletcher Challenge Energy Canada Inc. application for an approval to construct a sweet multiwell battery Leduc area
- Date
- 1999
- Title
- Decision 99-19 : Fletcher Challenge Energy Canada Inc. application for an approval to construct a sweet multiwell battery Leduc area
- Date
- 1999
- Applicant
- Fletcher Challenge Energy Canada Inc.
- Application Number
- 1033164
- 1033789
- Hearing Panel
- Miller GJ
- Dunn GC
- Houlihan RN
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Oil production
- Descriptors
- Battery
- Environmental impact
- Guide 60
- Leduc area
- NTS 83H
- Locating
- Gas flaring
- Groundwater
- Public consultation
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
- Notes
- EUB decision D99-19 on applications no. 1033164 and 1033789 by Fletcher Challenge Energy Canada Inc. to construct a sweet multiwell battery located at 11-26-48-26 W4M
- Interveners
- Loose G
- Loose C
- Bucsis L
- Peter E
- Balzer D
- Beck B
- Capital Health Authority
- Dupierry R
- Knull G
- Faulkner G
- Langert H
- Labrecque A
- Benfeld C
- Peden I
- Jasper M
- Approval
- Approved
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- Battery design will include vapour recovery unit
- Fletcher will finalize agreement with Probe to receive and treat oil emulsion at Probe facility at 13-8-49-25- W4M when ATCO Watelet plant is unable
- Lease site will be bermed to prevent surface runoff
- Fletcher will test the water wells of residents if requested
- Fletcher will address the adequacy of culverts on access road
- Fletcher will use electric drive compressors to reduce noise from theh battery
- Fletcher will establish committee to address commitments, including the development of an air monitoring program
- Location
- 11-26-048-26W4
Decision 2001-111
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3490
- Applicant
- Epcor Generation Inc.
- Epcor Power Development Corpoaration
- Application Number
- 2001173
- Title
- Decision 2001-111: EPCOR Generation Inc. and EPCOR Power Development Corporation expansion of Genesee power plant
- Date
- 2001
- Title
- Decision 2001-111: EPCOR Generation Inc. and EPCOR Power Development Corporation expansion of Genesee power plant
- Date
- 2001
- Application Number
- 2001173
- Hearing Panel
- McCrank MN
- Lock RG
- Miller GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Utilities
- Category
- Electric power
- Descriptors
- Electric power generation
- Genesee Power Plant
- Coal - fuel
- Thermal Power Plant
- Leduc area
- NTS 83G
- Decision D2001-33
- Decision D2001-101
- Environmental impact
- Safety
- Air pollution
- Fisheries
- Water pollution
- Wildlife
- Noise (sound)
- Health
- Human factor
- Socio-economic effect
- Cooling system
- Legal References
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
- Hydro and Electric Energy Act S2
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S2
- Notes
- EUB Decision 2001-111 on application no. 2001173 by EPCOR Generation Inc. and EPCOR Power Development Corporation to construct a 490-megawatt expansion to its existing coal-fired Genesee power plant at Rge 25-50-3 W5M
- Interveners
- Alberta Environment
- Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency
- Capital Health Authority
- Clean Energy Coalition
- Department of Fisheries and Oceans
- ENMAX Energy Corporation
- ENMAX Power Corporation
- Enron Canada Corporation
- Environment Canada
- ESBI Alberta Ltd.
- Fording Coal Limited
- Hebner Group
- Kruger Group (for the local area residents of Genesee)
- Mewassin Community Action Group
- Paul First Nation
- TransAlta Utilities Corporation
- TransCanada Energy Limited
- Anderson AM
- Bernette Ho L
- Bird T
- Bjorge R
- Blackall P
- Bodnarek R
- Bradford J
- Buchwald V
- Bull A
- Buss K
- Cheng L
- Chesterman D
- Cook S
- Cusano LA
- Dobko R
- Donahue W
- Fairbairn M
- Forster C
- Forster L
- Gagner E
- Gaspe D
- Good Striker D
- Griffiths M
- Hannaford DJ
- Hebner B
- Hebner D
- Hemstock RN
- Hnytka F
- Huber HR
- Kellerhals M
- Kruger D
- Lakeman B
- Lawrence L
- Lawrence S
- Legge A
- Lloyd D
- MacDonald B
- Mackenzie A
- Mak A
- Marr-Laing T
- McDonald K
- Paul D
- Phillips L
- Rain O
- Rain P
- Rain R
- Ross G
- Sawatsky N
- Secord RC
- Shores W
- Stepaniuk DW
- Stubbings
- Tyrell H
- Valupadas P
- Vincent M
- Wallace RB
- Yanor-McRae R
- Approval
- Approved
- Conditions
- The Board expects that EPCOR will adhere to all commitments it made during the consultation process, in the application, and at the hearing on such matters as mitigation, monitoring, and bilateral agreements.
- Location
- ##-25-050-03W5
Decision 2016-005
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4522
- Applicant
- R. and M. Schulze
- Application Number
- 1827949
- Title
- Decision 2016-005 : R. Schulze and M. Shulze section 33 pipeline removal
- Date
- 2016
- Title
- Decision 2016-005 : R. Schulze and M. Shulze section 33 pipeline removal
- Date
- 2016
- Applicant
- R. and M. Schulze
- Application Number
- 1827949
- Hearing Type
- No Hearing
- Category
- Pipelines
- Descriptors
- Pipeline
- Relocation
- Leduc area
- Leduc-Woodbend field
- Land use
- Land titles
- Environmental impact
- Economic analysis
- Legal References
- Pipeline Act S33
- Notes
- Change to legal citation effective January 2011
- Approval
- Withdrawn
- Location
- 06-24-043-05W5
Decision E60-(p.285)
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision574
- Applicant
- Sage Oil Company Limited
- Application Number
- 318
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Sage Oil Company Limited, 1960 (scheme for the gathering, processing and disposal of gas produced from the well Sage east Leduc 8-5-50-25, in the east Leduc area)
- Date
- 1960
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Sage Oil Company Limited, 1960 (scheme for the gathering, processing and disposal of gas produced from the well Sage east Leduc 8-5-50-25, in the east Leduc area)
- Date
- 1960
- Applicant
- Sage Oil Company Limited
- Application Number
- 318
- Hearing Panel
- Lashuk NJ
- Matthews MW
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Gas processing
- Notes
- Examiners concluded that the scheme is a reasonable method of producing the hydrocarbons; attempt had been made in the past to produce the well as an oil well but it was shut in due to extremely high GOR's and WOR's
- Approval
- Approved
Decision E63-(P.191)
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1016
- Applicant
- Gridoil Freehold Leases Ltd.
- Application Number
- 1630
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Gridoil Freehold Leases Ltd., 1963 (to establish two legal subdivision oil well spacing units for the Nisku formation in the south Leduc area)
- Date
- 1963
- Title
- Examiners report on application by Gridoil Freehold Leases Ltd., 1963 (to establish two legal subdivision oil well spacing units for the Nisku formation in the south Leduc area)
- Date
- 1963
- Applicant
- Gridoil Freehold Leases Ltd.
- Application Number
- 1630
- Hearing Panel
- Craig DR
- Bohme VE
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Spacing
- Descriptors
- Oil producing
- Drilling spacing unit
- Nisku Fm
- Leduc area
- NTS 83H
- Notes
- Examiners report E63-(P.191) on application No. 1630 for the establishment of two legal subdivision oil well spacing units for the Nisku formation in the South Leduc area.
- Approval
- Approved