31 records – page 1 of 2.

Application 790421

https://had.aer.ca/link/application20977
Applicant
Esso Resources Canada Limited
Summary
Proposed combustion experiment
Decision/Order/Approval
Approval 2921
Date Registered
Jun 22, 1979
Applicant
Esso Resources Canada Limited
Summary
Proposed combustion experiment
Category
Oil
Descriptors
Experimental scheme
Crude oil
In-situ combustion
Area
Joarcam
Date Registered
Jun 22, 1979
Decision/Order/Approval
Approval 2921
Less detail

Application 811019

https://had.aer.ca/link/application22750
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Summary
For approval to implement an in-situ combustion experimental scheme
Decision/Order/Approval
Approval 3537
Date Registered
Dec 16, 1981
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Summary
For approval to implement an in-situ combustion experimental scheme
Category
Oil
Descriptors
Enhanced recovery
In-situ combustion
Area
Countess
Date Registered
Dec 16, 1981
Decision/Order/Approval
Approval 3537
Less detail

Application 820597

https://had.aer.ca/link/application31238
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Summary
Amendment of approval No. 3537 for enhanced recovery of oil by in- situ combustion
Decision/Order/Approval
Approval 3537A
Date Registered
Jun 21, 1982
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Summary
Amendment of approval No. 3537 for enhanced recovery of oil by in- situ combustion
Category
Oil
Descriptors
Enhanced recovery
In-situ combustion
Amendment
Area
Countess
Date Registered
Jun 21, 1982
Decision/Order/Approval
Approval 3537A
Less detail

Application 830227

https://had.aer.ca/link/application28572
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Summary
Amendment of approval No. 3537 for enhanced recovery by in-situ combustion
Decision/Order/Approval
Deregistered
Date Registered
Mar 09, 1983
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Summary
Amendment of approval No. 3537 for enhanced recovery by in-situ combustion
Category
Oil
Descriptors
Enhanced recovery
In-situ combustion
Amendment
Area
Countess
Date Registered
Mar 09, 1983
Decision/Order/Approval
Deregistered
Less detail

Application 841146

https://had.aer.ca/link/application18084
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Summary
To amend approval 3537A regarding enhanced recovery of oil by in situ combustion
Decision/Order/Approval
Approval 3537B
Date Registered
Nov 08, 1984
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Summary
To amend approval 3537A regarding enhanced recovery of oil by in situ combustion
Category
Oil
Descriptors
Enhanced recovery
In-situ combustion
Amendment
Area
Countess
Date Registered
Nov 08, 1984
Decision/Order/Approval
Approval 3537B
Less detail

Application 871036

https://had.aer.ca/link/application12033
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Summary
Extension of expiration date
Decision/Order/Approval
Approval 3537C
Date Registered
Jul 16, 1987
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Summary
Extension of expiration date
Category
Oil
Descriptors
Enhanced recovery
In-situ combustion
Area
Countess
Date Registered
Jul 16, 1987
Decision/Order/Approval
Approval 3537C
Less detail

Application 871757

https://had.aer.ca/link/application11453
Applicant
Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
Summary
To construct and operate an experimental in-situ scheme (the Hilda Lake pilot project) to evaluate bitumen recovery
Decision/Order/Approval
Approval 5884
Date Registered
Nov 06, 1987
Applicant
Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
Summary
To construct and operate an experimental in-situ scheme (the Hilda Lake pilot project) to evaluate bitumen recovery
Category
Oil Sands
Descriptors
Oil sands scheme
Experimental scheme
In-situ combustion
Enhanced recovery
Area
Cold Lake
Date Registered
Nov 06, 1987
Decision/Order/Approval
Approval 5884
Less detail

Application 921878

https://had.aer.ca/link/application1023
Applicant
Petro Canada Resources
Summary
Requesting to implement an experimental in-situ combustion scheme.
Decision/Order/Approval
Approval 7156
Date Registered
Dec 17, 1992
Applicant
Petro Canada Resources
Summary
Requesting to implement an experimental in-situ combustion scheme.
Category
Oil
Descriptors
Enhanced recovery
In-situ combustion
Area
Shekilie
Date Registered
Dec 17, 1992
Decision/Order/Approval
Approval 7156
Less detail

Decision 63-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2468
Applicant
Cities Service Athabasca Inc.
Imperial Oil Limited
Richfield Oil Corporation
Royalite Oil Company Limited
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
957
219 (Hearing)
1116
220 (Hearing)
Title
Decision on application by cities service Athabasca Inc., and Shell Canada Limited, 1963 (to recover oil from the tar sands)
Date
1963
Title
Decision on application by cities service Athabasca Inc., and Shell Canada Limited, 1963 (to recover oil from the tar sands)
Date
1963
Applicant
Cities Service Athabasca Inc.
Imperial Oil Limited
Richfield Oil Corporation
Royalite Oil Company Limited
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
957
219 (Hearing)
1116
220 (Hearing)
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Manyluk AF
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Athabasca oil sands
Mildred Lake project
Oil sands project
Alberta
Crude oil demand
Economic forecasting
In situ
NTS 74D
NTS 74E
Oil mining
Oil sands oil recovery
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act Part 6A
Notes
ERCB Report 63-8 on application no. 957 (Hearing 219) by Cities Service et al to produce 100,000 barrels per day of synthetic crude oil from Crown Lease No. 17 at Mildred Lake, commencing in 1969 and using a mining and hot water process and on application no. 1116 (Hearing 220) by Shell to product 130,000 barrels of raw crude oil per day from Crown leases No. 26, 42, 45 & 53 in the Namur Lake area of the Athabasca Oil Sands commencing in 1969 and using an in situ thermal recovery process; Board Hearing on Cities Service in Calgary on 1963-01-15/16; Board Hearing on Shell in Calgary on 1963-02-12/13/14; These two applications represent the 2nd and 3rd applications respectively for commercial oil sands schemes.
Less detail

Decision 75-M

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2354
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
N/A
Title
Prospects for coal gasification in Alberta
Date
1975
Title
Prospects for coal gasification in Alberta
Date
1975
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
N/A
Hearing Panel
N/A
Hearing Type
N/A
Category
Coal
Descriptors
Coal gasification
Energy conversion
Alberta
Ammonia
Coal
Coal reserve
Economic analysis
Fischer Tropsch synthesis
In situ
Koppers-Totzek coal gasification
Liquid fuel
Manufactured gas
Methanol
Petrochemical
Notes
ERCB report 75-M
Less detail

Decision 81-23

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1985
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
810416
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1981 (Dome Lindbergh experimental scheme)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1981 (Dome Lindbergh experimental scheme)
Date
1981
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
810416
Hearing Type
Board
No Hearing
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Heavy oil project
In situ
Lindbergh field
Thermal recovery
Viscous oil recovery
Waterflooding
NTS 73E
Pilot scale
Notes
Decision 81-23 on application No. 810416 for experimental scheme for recovery of heavy oil in the Lindbergh field in section 18-55-5 W4M using combination thermal drives (fireflood & waterflood); no hearing
Less detail

Decision 81-C

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2319
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
800664
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1981 make-up fuel ESSO Cold Lake Project (natural gas vs coal as make-up fuel)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1981 make-up fuel ESSO Cold Lake Project (natural gas vs coal as make-up fuel)
Date
1981
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
800664
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cold Lake area
Cold Lake heavy oil project
Cyclic steam injection
Heavy oil project
In situ
Steam injection
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Boiler
Coal - fuel
Coal gasification
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
ERCB 79-E
Fuel consumption
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 73L
Recovery factor
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S40
Notes
ERCB report 81-C on application No. 800664 to use natural gas as make-up fuel rather than coal; Board hearing 1980-10-08/09/10 see also ERCB report 79-E for original Decision on Cold Lake project, Decision D83-21 for Decision on later application (No. 830620) for phased development of the project, Decision D84-6 on application to proceed with phases 3&4 and Decision D85-17 on application to proceed with phases 5&6.
Less detail

Decision 82-36

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2043
Applicant
Albion Petroleum Corporation Limited
Application Number
820244
Title
Decision on application by Albion Petroleum Corporation Ltd., 1982 (experimental in situ oil sands scheme in the Bonnyville area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Albion Petroleum Corporation Ltd., 1982 (experimental in situ oil sands scheme in the Bonnyville area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Albion Petroleum Corporation Limited
Application Number
820244
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Bonnyville area
Cyclic steam injection
In situ
Steam injection
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Air quality
Colony sand
Emission
Environmental impact
Grand Rapids Fm
Land use
Noise (sound)
NTS 73L
Pilot scale
Pollution
Producing equipment
Safety
Waste disposal
Water disposal
Water supply
Well pattern
Well spacing
Notes
Decision 82-36 on application No. 820244 for an experimental oil sands scheme in section 12-61-6 W4M to recover bitumen from the Colony sand of the Cold Lake-upper Grand Rapids oil sand deposit by drilling 17 slant hole wells and completing an existing evaluation well to form an 18-well pattern an using cyclic steam injection.
Interveners
Community Advisory Committee
W-32 Corporation Limited
Six-Vee Enterprises Limited
BP Exploration Canada Limited
Less detail

Decision 83-21

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2309
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
830620
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1983 (phased development of the Cold Lake oil sands project)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1983 (phased development of the Cold Lake oil sands project)
Date
1983
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
830620
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Berkowitz N
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cold Lake area
Cold Lake heavy oil project
Cyclic steam injection
Heavy oil project
In situ
Steam injection
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Clearwater Fm
Environmental impact
NTS 73L
Revision
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision D83-21 on application No. 830620 to amend approval to allow for phased development of the Cold Lake oil sands project (TP.64-66, R.3-4 W4M); see also ERCB report 79-E for Decision on original application, ERCB report 81-C for Decision on application to amend scheme by using natural gas as make-up fuel, Decision D84-16 on application to proceed with phases 3 & 4 and Decision D85-17 on application to proceed with phases 5 & 6
Interveners
Grand Centre and District Chamber of Commerce
Bonnyville and District Chamber of Commerce
Cold Lake Development Committee
Northern Alberta Development Council
Lakeland College
Basic Group of Companies
Alberta Trappers Central Association - Bonnyville & Cold Lake Local
BP Exploration Canada Ltd.
Shell Canada Resources Ltd.
Chief and Council of Cold Lake Indian Band
Tribal Chiefs Association of North Eastern Alberta
Saskatchewan Environment
Alberta Attorney General
Less detail

Decision 83-27

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2270
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
830588
830662
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1983 (For experimental in situ heavy oil scheme in the Lindbergh area)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1983 (For experimental in situ heavy oil scheme in the Lindbergh area)
Date
1983
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
830588
830662
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Carbon dioxide injection
Drilling spacing unit
In situ
Heavy oil project
Lindbergh area
Lindbergh field
LPG injection
Oil sands project
Viscous oil recovery
Cost analysis
Directional well
Environmental impact
Experimental design
NTS 73E
Pilot scale
Revision
Target area
Well pattern
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.035
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S8.030
Notes
Decision D83-27 on application No. 830588 for experimental scheme in a portion of the Lindbergh RR & WW pool in section 24, TP. 55, R.6, W4 and application No. 830662 for suspension of well spacing regulations for the area of the proposed experimental scheme.
Interveners
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Less detail

Decision 84-26

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1148
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Application Number
831102
Title
Examiners report on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1984 (experimental in situ scheme Lindbergh area)
Date
1984
Title
Examiners report on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1984 (experimental in situ scheme Lindbergh area)
Date
1984
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Application Number
831102
Hearing Panel
Warne GA
Moloney JK
Remmer WG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Carbon dioxide injection
Cyclic steam injection
Elk Point area
In situ
Lindbergh area
Steam injection
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Air quality
Communication
Emission
Environmental impact
Hydrogen sulphide
Noise (sound)
NTS 73E
Pilot scale
Pollution
Sulphur dioxide
Water well
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E84-26 on application No. 831102 for approval of an experimental scheme to cyclicly stimulate 10 existing wells in section 3, TP.56, R.6 W4M using steam and carbon dioxide to evaluate the technical and economic feasibility of this recovery method in the Cold Lake Wabiskaw McMurray oil sands deposit.
Interveners
Shymkiw, J.
Shymkiw, Mrs.J.
Shymkiw, H.
Shymkiw, Mrs.H.
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Less detail

Decision 84-26

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1699
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
840498
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1984 (Peace River expansion project)
Date
1984
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1984 (Peace River expansion project)
Date
1984
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
840498
Hearing Panel
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cyclic steam injection
In situ
Peace River area
Peace River in situ project
Produced water
Steam flooding
Steam injection
Oil sands project
Oil sands oil recovery
Thermal recovery
Bluesky Fm
Bullhead Gp
Contamination
Environmental impact
Expansion
Groundwater
NTS 84C
Oil producing
Pollution control
Recycling
Socio-economic effect
Water disposal
Water producing
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
Decision D84-26 on application No. 840498 for approval of a commercial scheme involving the expansion OS Shell's current Peace River in situ project under Board approval 2485 (TP.85, R.18, W5M) to recover bitumen from the Peace River Bluesky Bullhead oil sands deposit (Peace River expansion project); Board hearing 1984-09-11/12
Interveners
BP Resources Canada Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Lesser Slave Lake Indian Regional Council
Whitefish Lake Indian Band
Duncan's Band
Lubicon Lake Band
Native Members of the Cree Community of Little Buffalo Lake
Mackenzie Regional Planning Commission
Less detail

Decision 85-06

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1686
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
840739
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Experimental in situ scheme Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Experimental in situ scheme Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
840739
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cyclic steam injection
Elk Point area
In situ
Lindbergh area
Steam injection
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Air quality
Community relations
Cummings Fm
Emission
Environmental impact
Land value
Monitoring
Noise (sound)
NTS 73E
Pilot scale
Pollution
Safety
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
Decision D85-6 on application No. 840739 for approval to develop a 16 well cyclic steam experimental project in the Cummings zone of the Cold Lake Wabiskaw-McMurray oil sands deposit (section 10-56-6 W4M); resulted in approval No. 4448
Interveners
Yaremkevich, D.
Kadutski, D.
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Group of Elk Point-Lindbergh Area Residents
Town of Elk Point
County of Vermillion River
County of St.Paul
Less detail

Decision 85-07

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1685
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Application Number
840736
840986
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1985 (reduced well spacing and cleaning plant Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1985 (reduced well spacing and cleaning plant Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Application Number
840736
840986
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Spacing
Descriptors
Drilling spacing unit
In situ
Industrial plant
Lindbergh area
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Bitumen
Cleaning
Community relations
Contamination
Cummings Fm
Directional well
Environmental impact
Groundwater
Monitoring
Noise (sound)
NTS 73E
Oil pipeline
Solid hydrocarbon
Transportation
Truck
Water disposal
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.002
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.030
Notes
Decision D85-7 on application No. 840736 and No. 840986 to reduce well spacing for primary recovery from Cummings zone-Cold Lake-Wabiskaw-McMurray oil sands deposit and to construct and operate a cleaning plant to handle hydrocarbon production trucked from various PanCanadian wells (in section 3-56-6 W4M); Board hearing 84-12-11/12; resulted in Order No. Misc 8501
Interveners
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Shymkiw, J.
Shymkiw, Mrs.J.
Shymkiw, H.
Shymikiw, Mrs.H.
Kozicky, C.
Kozicky, Mrs.C.
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Group of Elk Point-Lindbergh Area Residents
Town of Elk Point
County of St. Paul
Less detail

Decision 85-15

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1680
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
840227
Title
Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1985 (commercial oil sands project (phase 1) Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1985 (commercial oil sands project (phase 1) Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
840227
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Carbon dioxide injection
Cyclic steam injection
Elk Point area
Elk Point project
In situ
Industrial plant
Lindbergh field
Steam flooding
Steam injection
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Air quality
Bitumen
Cleaning
Contamination
Disposal well
Emission
Environmental impact
ID-80-02
Hydrogen sulphide
Land reclamation
Land use
Locating
Monitoring
NTS 73E
Noise (sound)
Pollution
Recovery factor
Recycling
Socio-economic effect
Waste disposal
Water disposal
Water supply
Water well
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
Decision D85-15 (with addendum) on application No. 840227 for approval of phase 1 of a three phase commercial oil sands project (Elk Point project) in Lindbergh sector of Cold Lake oil sands deposits, consisting of 13-well cyclic steam and steam flood stimulation project on 2 Hectare well spacing and a 640 CU. M./day bitumen cleaning plant (TP.54-46, R.5-7 W4M); Board hearing 1985-01-08/09/12/15-18/21-23
Interveners
Kadutski, D.
Kadutski, C.
Kadutski, M.
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Keith, L.
Group of Elk Point -Lindbergh Area Residents
Town of Elk Point
County of St. Paul
Westmin Resources Limited
Less detail

31 records – page 1 of 2.