23 records – page 1 of 2.

Decision 82-19

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2059
Applicant
Mitchell Energy Corporation
Application Number
820260
820261
Title
Decision on application by Mitchell Energy Corporation, 1982 (reinstatement of well licence and permit to construct pipelines in the Okotoks area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Mitchell Energy Corporation, 1982 (reinstatement of well licence and permit to construct pipelines in the Okotoks area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Mitchell Energy Corporation
Application Number
820260
820261
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Okotoks area
Okotoks field
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Well licence
Blowout preventer
Directional drilling
Drilling cost
Emergency procedure
Energy development
Environmental impact
Equity
ID-81-03
IL-81-07
Gas producing
Gas reserve
Gas well
Hydrogen sulphide
Land use
Land value
Lease drainage
Locating
NTS 82I
Pipeline route
Safety
Urban development
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S41
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 82-19 on application No. 820260 to reinstate well licence 92961 to drill well in LSD 11-30-20-28 W4M to obtain sour gas production from Crossfield member of Wabamun GP and No. 820261 for permits to construct pipelines to transport sour gas and fuel gas in the area; Board hearing 1982-04-27/28
Interveners
Payne, L.H.
deVries, D.
Rio Frio Ranch Ltd.
Sallenbach, O.
Less detail

Decision 82-21

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1127
Applicant
Cimarron Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
820327
Title
Examiners report on application by Cimarron Petroleum Ltd., 1982 (gas processing plant Orion area)
Date
1982
Title
Examiners report on application by Cimarron Petroleum Ltd., 1982 (gas processing plant Orion area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Cimarron Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
820327
Hearing Panel
Edgecombe RW
Sharp KG
Dilay JD
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Orion field
Sour gas
Amine
Environmental impact
ID-81-03
Flare
Gas processing
Emission
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 72E
Plant location
Pollution control
Sulphur dioxide
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E82-21 on application No. 820327 to construct & operate a gas sweetening facility at Cimarron's well in LSD 6-18-6-6 W4M to process sour gas.
Interveners
Meyer, F.
Meyer, Mrs.
Bohnet, D.
Bohnet, Mrs.
Less detail

Decision 82-23

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2055
Applicant
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
820283
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (well licence to drill an exploratory well Millarville area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (well licence to drill an exploratory well Millarville area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
820283
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Brushett ER
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Sour gas
Well licence
Community relations
Contamination
Drilling fluid
Drilling program
Drilling Waste disposal
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
ID-81-03
Exploratory well
Gas well
Safety
Waste disposal
Water supply
Water well
Legal References
EUB Rules of Practice
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
Decision 82-23 on application No. 820283 to drill the proposed well Gulf et al Millarville 6-32-22-4 directionally from a surface location in LSD 14-29-22-4 W5M.
Interveners
Rusticana Estates,Echo Hill and surrounding area residents
Canadian Wildlife Federation
Location
06-32-022-04W5
14-29-022-04W5
Less detail

Decision 82-38

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2041
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
810543
810606
810376
810377
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited and Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (gas plant approval amendments and pipeline permits Pincher Creek area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited and Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (gas plant approval amendments and pipeline permits Pincher Creek area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
810543
810606
810376
810377
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Gas processing plant
Lookout Butte field
Pincher Creek field
Pincher Creek gas plant
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Waterton area
Waterton gas plant
Abandonment
Economic analysis
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
ID-81-03
Gas conservation
Land reclamation
Land use
Monitoring
NTS 82H
Pipeline design
Safety
Shutdown
Site survey
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision D82-38 on application No. 810543 by Gulf to shut down its Pincher Creek gas plant, No. 810606 by Shell to allow its Waterton plant to process Pincher Creek and Lookout Butte gas and No. 810376 and 810377 by Gulf for pipelines from Pincher Creek plant to Waterton plant (all in TP.4, R.29-30, W4M).
Interveners
Oldman River Regional Planning Commission
Municipal District of Pincher Creek No. 9
Town of Pincher Creek
Pincher Creek Economic Development Committee
Hedenstrom, J.
Less detail

Decision 82-E

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2314
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
810148
810149
810150
810663
810714
810715
810716
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1982 Shell proposed Moose and Whiskey Pipelines and related facilities, Kananaskis area
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1982 Shell proposed Moose and Whiskey Pipelines and related facilities, Kananaskis area
Date
1982
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
810148
810149
810150
810663
810714
810715
810716
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Strom NA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Battery
Compressor station
Fuel gas pipeline
Gathering line
Gas pipeline
Kananaskis Area
Moose field
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Water disposal
Water pipeline
Whiskey field
Atmospheric diffusion
Conflict
Disposal well
Economic analysis
Energy development
Environmental impact
ID-81-03
IL-80-24
Gas producing
Hydrogen sulphide
Land reclamation
Land use
NTS 82J
NTS 82O
Pipeline crossing
Pipeline design
Pipeline leak
Pipeline route
Recreational facility
Safety
Sulphur recovery
Waste disposal
Waste water
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Pipeline Act
Notes
ERCB Reort 82-E on application no. 810148 for a pipeline to transport sweet fuel gas from Quirk Creek Plant to proposed Whiskey and Moose compressor stations; on application no. 810149 for pipeline to to transport sour gas from proposed compressor to Quirk Creek plant; on application no. 810150 for pipeline to transport sour gas from wellheads to proposed Moose and Whiskey compressor stations; on application no. 810663 for a pipeline to transport sour water from proposed compressor station to an injection well; on application no. 810714 to construct a gas battery with dehydration and liquid separation facilities and one compressor (LSD 4-35-21-5, W5M); on application no. 810715 to construct gas battery with dehydration and liquid separation facilities and two compressors (LSD 13-22-22-6, W5); and on application no. 810716 to dispose of sour water produced from Moose and Whiskey fields by injection into Mississippian Turner Valley Fm; Board hearing 1982-01-06/07/08/09/10/13/14/15 & 1982-02-01; See related ERCB Decisions 82-3, 82-12 and Report 82-D; See also ERCB Decision D83-22 on later Shell application (No. 830603) for Board to reconsider decision contained in this report
Less detail

Decision 83-06

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2390
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
821207
Title
Decision on public meeting to consider concerns regarding the development of the proposed Saddle Ridge area
Date
1983
Title
Decision on public meeting to consider concerns regarding the development of the proposed Saddle Ridge area
Date
1983
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
821207
Hearing Panel
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Land use
Descriptors
Energy development
Land use
Regional planning
Risk
Saddleridge area
Sour gas
Urban development
Urban planning
Calgary area
Emergency procedure
Encroachment
ID-81-03
Gas pipeline
Gas producing
Gas reserve
Gas well
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 82P
Safety
Notes
Decision No. D83-6 on proceeding No. 821207 to consider concerns relating to development of Saddle Ridge area of NE Calgary; public meeting held 1983-01-25/26 & 1983-03-14/15
Interveners
City of Calgary Planning Department
Carma Developers Ltd.
Kentron Development Corporation Ltd.
Cathton Holdings
Qualico Developments
Oscar Fech Construction Ltd.
Longpre Associates
Manz, A.E.
219575 Alberta Ltd.
Saddle Ridge Community Association
Petrogas Processing Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 83-13

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2330
Applicant
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
820346
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., 1983 (Okotoks sour gas processing plant)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., 1983 (Okotoks sour gas processing plant)
Date
1983
Applicant
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
820346
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Bohme VE
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Conflict
Gas processing plant
Mazeppa gas plant
Okotoks field
Sour gas
Benefit cost analysis
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
ID-81-03
IL-80-24
Gas reserve
Health
Livestock
Locating
NTS 82I
Plant location
Safety
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Water supply
Water use
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision no.D83-13 on application No. 820346 for sour gas processing plant in the Mazeppa area of Okotoks field in section 3-20-28 W4M or section 35-19-28 W4M; see also Decision D83-12 on related proceeding No. 821137 (public inquiry to consider potential conflicts between development of sour gas reserves and residential development in the Okotoks area);Board hearing 1983-04-11/12/13/14/15/18
Interveners
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Committee for Toxic Pollutant Controls
Goldenview Farms Ltd.
Pan-Alberta Gas Ltd.
Rio Frio Ranch Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 83-17

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2316
Applicant
ICG Resources Ltd.
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Petrogas Processing Ltd.
Application Number
830165
830166
830167
830460
830461
830488
830489
Title
Decision on application by ICG Resources Ltd., 1983 (to drill well and construct pipelines in Crossfield Airdrie area); Decision on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., 1983 (special drilling spacing unit and licence to drill a well in Crossfield Airdrie area); Decision on application by Petrogas Processing Ltd., 1983 (to construct two pipelines in Crossfiled Airdrie area) 1983
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by ICG Resources Ltd., 1983 (to drill well and construct pipelines in Crossfield Airdrie area); Decision on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., 1983 (special drilling spacing unit and licence to drill a well in Crossfield Airdrie area); Decision on application by Petrogas Processing Ltd., 1983 (to construct two pipelines in Crossfiled Airdrie area) 1983
Date
1983
Applicant
ICG Resources Ltd.
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Petrogas Processing Ltd.
Application Number
830165
830166
830167
830460
830461
830488
830489
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Crossfield Airdrie area
Crossfield East field
Drilling spacing unit
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Gathering line
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Well licence
Blowout control
Blowout preventer
Design criteria
Emergency procedure
Equity
ID-81-03
ID-OG-76-02
Gas producing
Geologic interpretation
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 82O
NTS 82P
Pipeline route
Route selection
Safety
Target area
Wabamun Gp
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.020
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.050
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision on application No. 830167 by ICG to drill a well on application No. 830165 by ICG to construct sweet fule gas pipeline to the well, on application No. 830166 by ICG to construct sour gas pipeline to tie well into existing Canoxy gas gathering system on application No. 830461 by Canoxy for a special drilling spacing unit and on application No. 830460 by Canoxy to drill a well, on application No. 830488 by Petrogas for sour gas pipeline proposed well to existing Canoxy gathering system and application No. 830489 by Petrogas to construct sweet fuel gas pipeline to the well sites (all in TP.27, R.28 W4 to R.1 W5)
Interveners
Austin Exploration Ltd.
Associated Engineering Services Ltd.
Fletcher, A.T.
Fletcher, H.
Less detail

Decision 83-22

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2301
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
830603
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1983; Shell proposed Moose and Whiskey pipelines and related facilities, Kananaskis area
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1983; Shell proposed Moose and Whiskey pipelines and related facilities, Kananaskis area
Date
1983
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
830603
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Strom NA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Kananaskis Area
Moose field
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Whiskey field
Atmospheric diffusion
ID-81-03
Hydrogen sulphide
Pipeline design
Safety
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision D83-22 on application No. 830603 to reconsider earlier Decision (ERCB report 82-E) on public safety of proposed facilities in the Kananaskis area (pipelines to transport sour gas from Moose and Whiskey fields to Quirk Creek gas plant for processing).
Interveners
Esso Resources Canada Limited
Less detail

Decision 83-29

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision253
Applicant
Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Limited
Application Number
830688
830689
Title
Examiners report on application by Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Ltd., 1983 (sour gas pipeline, fuel gas pipeline CARSTAIRS area)
Date
1983
Title
Examiners report on application by Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Ltd., 1983 (sour gas pipeline, fuel gas pipeline CARSTAIRS area)
Date
1983
Applicant
Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Limited
Application Number
830688
830689
Hearing Panel
Fox EG
Pearson DG
Stafford GH
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Olds area
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Energy development
Environmental impact
ID-81-03
Gas producing
Land reclamation
NTS 83O
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Planning
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E83-29 on application No. 830688 for a permit to construct 3.02 km of 60.3- and 88.9 MM outside diameter pipeline to transport sour gas from the well Ammin Crosse 7-2-30-1 W5M to an existing Amerada sour gas line at 2-14-30-1 W5M and on application No. 830689 for a permit to construct 2.99 km of 60.3 MM outside diameter line to transport fuel gas from the existing pipeline to the well.
Interveners
Henderson, J.
Less detail

Decision 83-F

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2280
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
821213
Title
ERCB inquiry resource development/urban development west Edmonton area
Date
1983
Title
ERCB inquiry resource development/urban development west Edmonton area
Date
1983
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
821213
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Inquiry
Land use
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Energy development
Land use
Regional planning
Sour gas
Urban development
Urban planning
Conflict
Encroachment
ID-81-03
Hydrogen sulphide
Notes
ERCB report D83-F on proceeding No. 821213; public inquiry 1983-03-16/17/18/24/25 & 1983-04-08
Less detail

Decision 84-07

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1846
Applicant
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Application Number
831021
831022
Title
Decision on application by Canterra Energy Ltd., 1984 (sour gas pipeline, fuel gas pipeline, Calgary area)
Date
1984
Title
Decision on application by Canterra Energy Ltd., 1984 (sour gas pipeline, fuel gas pipeline, Calgary area)
Date
1984
Applicant
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Application Number
831021
831022
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Calgary area
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Conflict
Emergency procedure
ID-81-03
Hydrogen sulphide
Land value
NTS 82I
Pipeline accident
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Regional planning
Route selection
Safety
Urban development
Notes
Decision D84-7 on application No. 831021 to construct fuel gas pipeline from LSD 10-2-22-29 W4M to well sites at 10-13-22-29 W4M, 11-24-22-29 W4M, & 10-20-22-28 W4M and application No. 831022 for sour gas pipeline from well sites to existing pipeline at LSD 10-2-22-29 W4M; Board hearing 1984-02-15/16/17
Interveners
Lammle, B.
Lammle, M.
McKeag, L.
Moeller, A.
Ollerenshaw, F.J.
Pearson, D.
Pearson, R.
Shields, R.
Shields, V.
Soutzo, C.G.
Soutzo, A.G.
Uragi, K.
Workman, D.
Thompson, L.E.
Thompson, L.G.
Walker, D.
Paradis, G.
Paradis, L.
McKinstry, B.
Pawluk, J.
Pawluk, M.
McKeag, A.
City of Calgary
Committee for Toxic Pollutant Controls
Less detail

Decision 84-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1966
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
830789
Title
Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1984 (application for a well licence, St. Albert)
Date
1984
Title
Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1984 (application for a well licence, St. Albert)
Date
1984
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
830789
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Brushett ER
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Sour gas
St. Albert area
Well licence
Emergency procedure
ID-81-03
NTS 83H
Oil producing
Wabamun Gp
Notes
Decision D84-8 on application No. 830789 for a well licence to drill near St. Albert in LSD 6-6-54-25 W4M to obtain oil production from the Wabamun FM.
Interveners
The City of St. Albert
Genstar Development Company
Location
06-06-054-25W4
Less detail

Decision 84-28

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1690
Applicant
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Application Number
830495
Title
Decision on application by Canterra Energy Ltd., 1984 (critical sour well in the Sundre area)
Date
1984
Title
Decision on application by Canterra Energy Ltd., 1984 (critical sour well in the Sundre area)
Date
1984
Applicant
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Application Number
830495
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Bergen area
Sour gas
Sundre area
Well licence
Blowout control
Blowout preventer
Casing string design
Drilling program
Emergency procedure
ID-81-03
Exploratory well
Gas producing
Gas well
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
Inspecting
Leduc Fm
NTS 82O
Marketing
Plugging
Producing well
Safety
Safety equipment
Solvent
Sulphur
Well classification
Notes
Decision D84-28 on application No. 830495 for a licence to drill a critical sour gas well in the Sundre area in LSD 12-12-32-6 W5M to evaluate and obtain production from the Leduc FM; Board hearing 1984-08-01/02/03/07/08/09/10/11
Interveners
Bergen Ratepayers Association
Inter-Varsity Christian Fellowship
Community of Fallen Timber
Town of Sundre
Mountain View Land Holders Group
City of Red Deer
Amoco Canada Petroleum Co. Ltd.
Burton, S.
Cloakey, G.E.
Goodwin, B.
Goodwin, M.
Grimstead, J.
Grimstead, C.
Halvorson, I.
Halvorson, M.
Worobetz, T.
Worobetz, M.
The Bauman Family
Bauman, Dr. J.A.
Haug, J.
Orr, J.
Huisman, Dr. R.
Newell, A.
Location
12-12-032-06W5
Less detail

Decision 85-38

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision982
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
850680
Title
Decision report 85-38: Public meeting to consider lands included in City of Calgary sour gas constraint area
Date
1985
Title
Decision report 85-38: Public meeting to consider lands included in City of Calgary sour gas constraint area
Date
1985
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
850680
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Land use
Descriptors
Land use
Regional planning
Sour gas
Urban development
Calgary area
Conflict
ID-81-03
Hydrogen sulphide
Land value
NTS 82I
Procedure
Notes
Decision D85-38 on proceeding No. 850680 on request by Mr. Fred Ollerenshaw to review the sour gas constraint area established in fall of 1982 for land SE of Calgary City limits insofar as it affects his lands in sections 23 & 24-22-29 W4M.
Interveners
Ollerenshaw, F.
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Soutzo, C.
Soutzo, A.
Bonnycastle, R.
Burgess, J.
City of Calgary
Less detail

Decision 86-15

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision602
Applicant
Town of Okotoks
Application Number
860281
Title
Decision on application by Town of Okotoks, 1986 (pursuant to section 34 of the Pipeline Act)
Date
1986
Title
Decision on application by Town of Okotoks, 1986 (pursuant to section 34 of the Pipeline Act)
Date
1986
Applicant
Town of Okotoks
Application Number
860281
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Control equipment
Gas pipeline
Okotoks area
Sour gas
ID-81-03
Encroachment
NTS 82I
Safety equipment
Safety valve
Urban development
Legal References
Pipeline Act S34
Notes
Decision D86-15 on application No. 860281 that Town of Okotoks requested that the Board direct Canterra to locate an emergency shutdown valve on the pipeline in LSD 9-35-20-29 W4M.
Interveners
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Alger, H.
Calgary Regional Planning Commission
Municipal District of Foothills
Location
09-35-020-29W4
Less detail

Decision 90-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision85
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
Application Number
890971
890969
891504
891505
891506
891478
891479
891480
891481
891482
891568
891569
891570
891571
900404
891483
891290
900236
891047
891757
891805
891804
891803
891703
891802
Title
Decision 90-08 : Shell Canada Limited and Husky Oil Operations Ltd.: Application for Caroline Beaverhill Lake gas development
Date
1990
Title
Decision 90-08 : Shell Canada Limited and Husky Oil Operations Ltd.: Application for Caroline Beaverhill Lake gas development
Date
1990
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
Application Number
890971
890969
891504
891505
891506
891478
891479
891480
891481
891482
891568
891569
891570
891571
900404
891483
891290
900236
891047
891757
891805
891804
891803
891703
891802
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Mink FJ
Bietz BF
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Caroline field
Caroline gas project
Energy development
Gas pipeline
Gas processing plant
Pipeline construction permit
Product pipeline
Sour gas
Sulphur recovery plant
Bearberry field
Benefit cost analysis
Carbon dioxide
Capitalized cost
Claus process
Conservation
Economic analysis
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
ID-81-03
ID-88-01
Feasibility
Forecasting
Groundwater
Nitrogen oxide
Noise (sound)
NTS 82O
NTS 83B
Operating cost
Petroleum conservation
Public interest
Reliability
Safety
Socio-economic effect
Soil conservation
Soil pollution
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Water disposal
Water pollution
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S4
Notes
Decision D90-8 on proceeding No. 890971 and on applications by Shell, Husky and associated parties for production, processing and transportation facilities for sour gas reserves in the Caroline Beaverhill Lake area (all in TP.31-36, R.3-10 W5M); Board hearing commenced 1990-04-17 and continued to 1990-05-10 with final argument 1990-05-28/29
Interveners
Federated Pipe Lines Ltd.
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Altana Exploration Company
ATCOR Ltd.
Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
Gulf Canada Resources Limited
Mobil Oil Canada
NOVA Corporation of Alberta
Numac Oil & Gas Ltd.
Union Pacific Resources Inc.
CN Rail
CP Rail
Alberta Fish and Game Association
Pollution Sub-Committee of the Public Advisory Committees - Environment Council of Alberta
Bauman, J.
Bauman, L.
Brown, R.
McCormick, H.
Brunner, J.
Brunner, L.
Heggie, R.
Burnstick Lake Cottage Owners' Association
Caroline Advisory Board
Caroline & District Chamber of Commerce
Concerned Residents Action Group
County of Mountain View No. 17
Diamond J. Industries Ltd.
Harris, D.
Harris, M.
Hermann, J.
Jans, E.
Jans, B.
Kostuch , M.
Rocky Veterinary Clinic Ltd.
Macklin, J.
Macklin, B.
Mountain View Land Holders Group
Olds& District Chamber of Commerce
Preservation of Agriculture and Living Space Society
Rocky Mountain House & District Chamber of Commerce
Roth, L.
Roth, S.
Saunders, D.
447 Area Residents
Sundre & District Chamber of Commerce
Town of Innisfail
Town of Sundre
Town of Rocky Mountain House
Village of Caroline
Wolf, R.E.
Less detail

Decision 94-06

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2518
Applicant
Conwest Exploration Company Limited
Application Number
931148
940446
940447
940448
940449
940450
Title
Decision 94-06 : Conwest Exploration Company Limited : Application for a sour gas plant and related pipelines in the Grande Prairie area
Date
1994
Title
Decision 94-06 : Conwest Exploration Company Limited : Application for a sour gas plant and related pipelines in the Grande Prairie area
Date
1994
Applicant
Conwest Exploration Company Limited
Application Number
931148
940446
940447
940448
940449
940450
Hearing Panel
Mink FJ
Berndtsson NG
Lillo HO
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Gathering line
Grande Prairie area
NTS 83M
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Environmental impact
ID-81-03
Indians of North America
Locating
Socio-economic effect
Notes
ERCB decision D94-6 on application no. 931148 for a sour gas plant in section 8-75-7 W6M and on applications 940446, 940447, 940448, 940449, and 940450 for related pipelines to gather sour raw gas and sour solution gas to feed the proposed plant and to transport natural gas liquids and condensate to the Peace Pipe System and fuel gas to each well site; Board hearing 1994-04-21/22/25/26
Interveners
Cimarron Petroleum Ltd
Suncor Inc.
Public Advisory Committee
County of Grande Prairie
Sexsmith Chamber of Commerce
Town of Beaverlodge
Baron Oilfield Supply
Northern Metalic Sales
Peace Tech Services
Prairie Truck and Trailer Parts Ltd.
Residents of LaGlace/Sexsmith
Elvestad, R.
Estlin, F.
Ganzeveld, D.R.
Johnson, D.L.
Kirkham. B. Jr.
Kirkham, D.
Kirkham, M.
Kirkham, B.
Kirkham, K.
Pol, J.
Group of Local Residents
Borysiuk, E.
Craipley, S.
Good-Gerow, L.
Iwaskow, A.
McLean, K.
Slauenwhite, F.
Lesser Slave Lake Indian Regional Council
Badger, J.G.
Bellarose, J.T.
Cardinal, D.
Chalifoux, V.
Halcrow, A.
Testawitch, J.
Willier, F.
Peace County Agricultural Protection Association
Morin, L.
Johnstone, A.H.
Less detail

Decision 95-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2542
Applicant
Atlantic Energy Ltd.
Application Number
950130
Title
Examiner report on application by Atlantic Energy Ltd. to construct about four km of steel pipeline to transport sour solution gas from a battery at 7-33-23-28 W4M to a sour gas gathering system at 6-9-24-28 W4M.
Date
1995
Title
Examiner report on application by Atlantic Energy Ltd. to construct about four km of steel pipeline to transport sour solution gas from a battery at 7-33-23-28 W4M to a sour gas gathering system at 6-9-24-28 W4M.
Date
1995
Applicant
Atlantic Energy Ltd.
Application Number
950130
Hearing Panel
Bruni MJ
Dunn GC
Vrskovy MJ
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Pipeline route
ID-81-03
Route selection
Notes
Examiners report on application by Atlantic Energy Ltd. to construct about four km of steel pipeline to transport sour solution gas from a battery at 7-33-23-28 W4M to a sour gas gathering system at 6-9-24-28 W4M.
Interveners
A& H Holdings Ltd.
Louson Investments Ltd.
O'Ferrall, B.K.
Less detail

Decision 96-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2574
Applicant
Encal Energy Limited
Application Number
951161
Title
Decision 96-11 : Encal Energy Limited : Application to relicense pipeline to transport sour gas in the Rimbey area
Date
1996
Title
Decision 96-11 : Encal Energy Limited : Application to relicense pipeline to transport sour gas in the Rimbey area
Date
1996
Applicant
Encal Energy Limited
Application Number
951161
Hearing Panel
Prince JP
Dilay JD
Lillo HO
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
CSA Standard (Z662)
ID-81-03
Gas pipeline
NTS 83B
Pipeline relicensing
Rimbey area
Risk
Safety
Sour gas
Legal References
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
EUB Decision D96-1 on application no. 951161 by Encal Energy for approval to change the substance authorized to be carried in an existing pipeline (Crystal pipeline) (from compressor station in Lsd 1-4-47-3 W5M to Gulf Homeglen Rimbey gas plant in Lsd 4-5-44-1 W5M) from sweet natural gas to sour natural gas (containing up to 18 moles of hydrogen sulphide per kilomole of natural gas);
Board hearing 1996-02-07/08
Interveners
Hanneman P
Hanneman N
Wheale T
Location
01-04-047-03W5
04-05-044-01W5
Less detail

23 records – page 1 of 2.