141 records – page 1 of 8.

Decision 73-14

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2197
Applicant
Imperial Oil Limited
Application Number
6823
Title
Decision on application by Imperial Oil Limited, 1973 (increase in the maximum permitted hydrogen sulphide inlet rate at the Golden Spike gas processing plant)
Date
1973
Title
Decision on application by Imperial Oil Limited, 1973 (increase in the maximum permitted hydrogen sulphide inlet rate at the Golden Spike gas processing plant)
Date
1973
Applicant
Imperial Oil Limited
Application Number
6823
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Craig DR
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Hydrogen sulphide
Air quality
Gas processing plant
Golden Spike field
Sour gas
Notes
Decision 73-14 and addendum on application No. 6823 to amend approval No. 1531 to authorize increase in maximum hydrogen sulphide inlet rate and maximum permitted sulphur dioxide emission rate at Golden Spike gas processing plant; approval No. 1531D
Interveners
Goebel, I.
Adolph, J.
McDonald, M.
Sinclair, K.V.
Sinclair, R.
Miller, A.K.
Unifarm
Hage, K.D.
Ironside, R.G.
Wilson, D.J.
Jappsen, W.
Secord, R.
Michna, F.W.
Morin, R.D.
Vanthoff, J.
Howell, L.
Boje, J.
Less detail

Decision 74-10

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2180
Applicant
Imperial Oil Limited
Application Number
7887
Title
Decision on application by Imperial Oil Limited, 1974 (transmission of sour natural gas in 6-inch pipeline from the Jumping Pound west field to the Quirk Creek Gas Plant)
Date
1974
Title
Decision on application by Imperial Oil Limited, 1974 (transmission of sour natural gas in 6-inch pipeline from the Jumping Pound west field to the Quirk Creek Gas Plant)
Date
1974
Applicant
Imperial Oil Limited
Application Number
7887
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
Berkowitz N
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Jumping Pound west field
Sour gas
Environmental impact
Hydrogen sulphide
Safety
Notes
Decision 74-10 on application No. 7887 to construct about 33 mile long 6-inch pipeline for transmission of sour natural gas from well "IOE Jumpw 11-16-25-6 W5" to Quirk Creek gas plant; Board hearing 1974-08-08/09; application dismissed
Interveners
The Sarcee Indian Band
Sarcee Developments Ltd.
Copithorne, K.F.
The Department of Indian Affairs
City of Calgary
Less detail

Decision 76-15

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2149
Applicant
Texasgulf Inc.
Application Number
9183
9184
Title
Decision on application by Texasgulf Inc., 1976 (secondary lines for transmission of fuel gas and sour gas Okotoks area)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Texasgulf Inc., 1976 (secondary lines for transmission of fuel gas and sour gas Okotoks area)
Date
1976
Applicant
Texasgulf Inc.
Application Number
9183
9184
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Bohme VE
Macleod NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Okotoks field
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Hydrogen sulphide
Land use
Land value
NTS 82I
Pipeline accident
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S29
Energy Resources Conservation Act S34
Notes
Decision 76-15 on application No. 9183 to construct a secondary line to transport fuel gas from LSD 10-31-20-28 W4M to LSD 11-20-20-28 W4M and on application No. 9184 for a line to transport sour gas from LSD 11-20-20-28 W4M to the Okotoks gas plant (in LSD 14-36-20-29 W4M).
Interveners
Leduc, A.S.
Long, K.
Municipal District of Foothills
Rio Frio Ranch Ltd.
Sheep Creek Developments Limited
Less detail

Decision 77-04

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2144
Applicant
IPEX Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
9980
Title
Decision on application by IPEX Oil and Gas Ltd., 1977 (licence to drill a well in LS 14-36-26-1 W5M Crossfield and Airdrie areas)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by IPEX Oil and Gas Ltd., 1977 (licence to drill a well in LS 14-36-26-1 W5M Crossfield and Airdrie areas)
Date
1977
Applicant
IPEX Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
9980
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Airdrie area
Sour gas
Well licence
Emergency procedure
Gas producing
Gas well
Hydrogen sulphide
Isopach map
Land use
Locating
NTS 82O
Safety
Turner Valley Fm
Urban development
Notes
Decision 77-4 on application No. 9980 to drill the well, Ipex Czar et al Cross 14-36-26-1 (W5M), to produce gas from Elkton member of the Turner Valley formation; Board hearing 1977-02-23/24
Interveners
Town of Airdrie
Nu-West Development Corporation
Calgary Regional Planning Commission
Cooper, G.S.
Cirrus Land Corporation Ltd.
Location
14-36-026-01W5
Less detail

Decision 77-14

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2134
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
770189
Title
Decision report 77-14: Inquiry report on uncontrolled flow Shell 35 Waterton 12-9-3-30 W4, Waterton Pincher Creek area
Date
1977
Title
Decision report 77-14: Inquiry report on uncontrolled flow Shell 35 Waterton 12-9-3-30 W4, Waterton Pincher Creek area
Date
1977
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
770189
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Inquiry - Blowout
Descriptors
Blowout (well)
Pincher Creek area
Sour gas
Waterton area
Blowout control
Case history
Emergency procedure
Emission
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 82H
Safety
Inquiry
Notes
ERCB inquiry report 77-14 on proceeding No. 770189 to inquire into the cause and events relating to an uncontrolled flow of sour gas from the well Shell 35 Waterton 12-9-3-30W4 on 28 February and 1 March 1977; Board inquiry 1977-03-16; also bound in 1977 Examiners reports starting on P.79
Interveners
Alberta Disaster Services
Huntley, J.
Tweedie, J.
Newton, G.
Municipal District of Pincher Creek
Oldman River Regional Planning Commission
Can-Tex Drilling and Exploration Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 78-04

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2116
Applicant
Gulf Oil Canada Limited
Application Number
770991
Title
Decision on inquiry into uncontrolled discharge of sour gas Gulf Oil Canada Limited secondary line licence 7293 in the Alix area, 1978
Date
1978
Title
Decision on inquiry into uncontrolled discharge of sour gas Gulf Oil Canada Limited secondary line licence 7293 in the Alix area, 1978
Date
1978
Applicant
Gulf Oil Canada Limited
Application Number
770991
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Inquiry - Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Pipeline accident
Pipeline leak
Sour gas
Atmospheric diffusion
Death
Emergency procedure
Evacuation
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 83A
Pipeline safety
Safety
Inquiry
Notes
Decision on proceeding No. 770991 on pipeline rupture in LSD 1-23-39-23 W4M on pipeline that transmits sour gas from Clive central battery to Gulf Nevis gas plant resulting in an uncontrolled discharge of sour gas at the break location; Public inquiry
Interveners
Quintana Exploration Co.
Hazen and Babb Drilling Consultants Ltd.
Love's Oilfield Construction
Schmidt Drilling
Less detail

Decision 78-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2112
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
780023
Title
Decision on inquiry into uncontrolled flow from the well Amoco Pacific Brazr 7-10-48-12 W5M in the Lodgepole Drayton Valley area, 1978
Date
1978
Title
Decision on inquiry into uncontrolled flow from the well Amoco Pacific Brazr 7-10-48-12 W5M in the Lodgepole Drayton Valley area, 1978
Date
1978
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
780023
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Kupchanko EE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Inquiry - Blowout
Descriptors
Blowout (well)
Blowout control
Drayton Valley area
Lodgepole blowout
Sour gas
Well killing
Air pollution
Case history
Inquiry
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 83G
Procedure
Safety
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S8.137
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S8.142
Notes
Decision 78-8 on proceeding No. 780023 to investigate an uncontrolled flow of sour gas from a well in LSD 7-10-48-12 W5M during a period from 1977-12-06 to 1978-01-02; Board inquiry 1978-02-22/23
Interveners
Alberta Disaster Services
Pacific Petroleum Ltd.
S&T Drilling (Northern) Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 78-11

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2109
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
770900
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Ltd., 1978 (permit to construct a secondary line for sour natural gas in the Jumping Pound area)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Ltd., 1978 (permit to construct a secondary line for sour natural gas in the Jumping Pound area)
Date
1978
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
770900
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Atmospheric diffusion
Environmental impact
Hydrogen sulphide
Nomograph
NTS 82O
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Right of way
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 78-11 on application No. 770900 to construct a sour gas pipeline from LSD 9-24-26-7 W5M to LSD 4-19-26-6 W5M; Board hearing 1978-02-09; reopened 1978-05-09
Interveners
Lamb, T.
Fish, J.R.
Less detail

Decision 81-09

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1758
Applicant
Panther Resources Ltd.
Application Number
800651
Title
Examiners report on application by Panther Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas processing plant)
Date
1981
Title
Examiners report on application by Panther Resources Ltd., 1981 (gas processing plant)
Date
1981
Applicant
Panther Resources Ltd.
Application Number
800651
Hearing Panel
Evans RG
Pearson DG
Remmer WG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Duhamel field
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Acidification
Air quality
Economic analysis
Emission
Environmental impact
Flare
Hydrogen sulphide removal
Livestock
Locating
Monitoring
NTS 83A
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
ERCB Examiners report No. E81-9 on application No. 800651 to construct and operate a sour gas processing plant southwest of Camrose in LSD 5-31-45-20 W4M; Examiners' hearing 81-01-15 adjourned to 81-03-17/18/19
Interveners
City of Camrose
County of Camrose No.22
Cordes, K.
Calvin, G.
Noden, D.
Luz, W.
Klapstein, W.
Sauer, J.
Sauer, K.
Weyhausen, H.
Weyga Farming Ltd.
Watterodt, T.
Watterodt, W.
Watterodt, M.
Schroeder, D.
Schroeder, K.
Schroeder, P.
Schroeder, H.
Graefin Von Helldorf, V.
Schroeser, I.
Baumgarten, E.
Braim, B.
Krangnes, D.
Snider, R.
Tate, R.
Less detail

Decision 81-12

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1996
Applicant
Phillips Petroleum Company Western Hemisphere
Application Number
801022
Title
Decision on application by Phillips Petroleum Company Western Hemisphere, 1981 (gas processing plant - Morley-Ghost River area)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Phillips Petroleum Company Western Hemisphere, 1981 (gas processing plant - Morley-Ghost River area)
Date
1981
Applicant
Phillips Petroleum Company Western Hemisphere
Application Number
801022
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Weaver Dr. RS
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Indians of North America
Morley field
Salter field
Sour gas
Air quality
Capacity
Desulphurization
Emission
Environmental impact
Flare
Hydrogen sulphide removal
Jurisdiction
Land use
Locating
Monitoring
NTS 82O
Plant location
Safety
Site survey
Sulphur dioxide
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
Decision 81-12 on application No. 801022 to process sour gas in one of 3 possible sites in TP.26, R.7-8, W5M; Board hearing 1981-04-22/24/27
Interveners
Stoney Band of Indians
Council of the Summer Village of Ghost Lake
Ghost Valley Protection Committee
Wasson, W.A.
Alberta Outfitters Association
The 6th Calgary Boy Scouts Group Committee
Kings' Fold Foundation
David H. McDougall Ranch
Wolf, R.E.
Calgary Regional Planning Commission
Improvement District No. 8
Less detail

Decision 82-12

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2066
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
810520
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1982 (Quirk Creek gas processing plant)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1982 (Quirk Creek gas processing plant)
Date
1982
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
810520
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Strom NA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Moose field
Quirk Creek plant
Sour gas
Whiskey field
Air pollution
Air quality
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
ID-80-02
IL-71-29
IL-80-24
Expansion
Hydrogen sulphide
Injection
Monitoring
NTS 82J
Pollution control
Procedure
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Underground
Waste disposal
Water pollution
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S2
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S4
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision 82-12 on application No. 810520 to utilize spare plant capacity to process sour gas reserves from Moose and Whiskey fields at the Quirk Creek gas plant located in the south half of section 4-21-4 W5M; Board hearing 1981-11-04/05/06/23/24/25/26 and 1981-12-14/15/16/17/18 and 1982-01-05/06; see also related Decision D82-3 on Jumping Pound gas plant and ERCB report 82-E for Decisions on related pipeline applications by Shell and Decision D83-8 for local interveners cost awards; see also related report 82-D
Interveners
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Hanen, Z.
Rumsey Ranches
Russell, A.
Canadian Wildlife Federation
Wolf, R.E.
Less detail

Decision 82-19

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2059
Applicant
Mitchell Energy Corporation
Application Number
820260
820261
Title
Decision on application by Mitchell Energy Corporation, 1982 (reinstatement of well licence and permit to construct pipelines in the Okotoks area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Mitchell Energy Corporation, 1982 (reinstatement of well licence and permit to construct pipelines in the Okotoks area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Mitchell Energy Corporation
Application Number
820260
820261
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Okotoks area
Okotoks field
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Well licence
Blowout preventer
Directional drilling
Drilling cost
Emergency procedure
Energy development
Environmental impact
Equity
ID-81-03
IL-81-07
Gas producing
Gas reserve
Gas well
Hydrogen sulphide
Land use
Land value
Lease drainage
Locating
NTS 82I
Pipeline route
Safety
Urban development
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S41
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 82-19 on application No. 820260 to reinstate well licence 92961 to drill well in LSD 11-30-20-28 W4M to obtain sour gas production from Crossfield member of Wabamun GP and No. 820261 for permits to construct pipelines to transport sour gas and fuel gas in the area; Board hearing 1982-04-27/28
Interveners
Payne, L.H.
deVries, D.
Rio Frio Ranch Ltd.
Sallenbach, O.
Less detail

Decision 82-21

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1127
Applicant
Cimarron Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
820327
Title
Examiners report on application by Cimarron Petroleum Ltd., 1982 (gas processing plant Orion area)
Date
1982
Title
Examiners report on application by Cimarron Petroleum Ltd., 1982 (gas processing plant Orion area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Cimarron Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
820327
Hearing Panel
Edgecombe RW
Sharp KG
Dilay JD
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Orion field
Sour gas
Amine
Environmental impact
ID-81-03
Flare
Gas processing
Emission
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 72E
Plant location
Pollution control
Sulphur dioxide
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E82-21 on application No. 820327 to construct & operate a gas sweetening facility at Cimarron's well in LSD 6-18-6-6 W4M to process sour gas.
Interveners
Meyer, F.
Meyer, Mrs.
Bohnet, D.
Bohnet, Mrs.
Less detail

Decision 82-39

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2040
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
820308
Title
Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1982 (approval of a solution gas processing plant St. Albert area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1982 (approval of a solution gas processing plant St. Albert area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
820308
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Brushett ER
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Morinville field
Sour gas
St. Albert area
St. Albert-Big Lake field
Air quality
Atmospheric diffusion
Dissolved gas
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
Flare
Gas conservation
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
Land use
Locating
NTS 83H
Plant location
Safety
Sulphur dioxide
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision 82-39 on application No. 820308 to process sour solution gas from three batteries in the St. Albert-Big Lake field & Morinville field at an existing battery site in LSD 14-36-53-26 W4M; Board hearing 1982-10-06/07
Interveners
Silver Chief Community Gas Plant Committee
Genstar Land Development
Municipal District of Sturgeon No. 90
Helenslea Acres
Less detail

Decision 82-D

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2313
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
810520
810092
Title
Sour gas processing in Alberta : a review of evidence presented at recent ERCB hearings respecting the impacts and surveillance of sour gas plants
Date
1982
Title
Sour gas processing in Alberta : a review of evidence presented at recent ERCB hearings respecting the impacts and surveillance of sour gas plants
Date
1982
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
810520
810092
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Air pollution
Emission
Environmental impact
Gas processing
Nitrogen oxide
Soil pollution
Sour gas
Sulphur
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur dioxide removal
Sulphur recovery
Water pollution
Acidification
Airborne waste
Alberta
Deposition
Exhaust gas
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
Injection
Livestock
Monitoring
Selenium
Trace element
Underground
Waste disposal
Notes
ERCB report 82-D arising from hearing to consider application for sour gas processing at Jumping Pound and Quirk Creek gas plants and pipeline to connect Moose and Whiskey sour gas reserves to Quirk Creek plant. for Decisions on these applications see ERCB Decisions 82-3, 82-12 and report 82-E
Less detail

Decision 82-E

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2314
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
810148
810149
810150
810663
810714
810715
810716
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1982 Shell proposed Moose and Whiskey Pipelines and related facilities, Kananaskis area
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1982 Shell proposed Moose and Whiskey Pipelines and related facilities, Kananaskis area
Date
1982
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
810148
810149
810150
810663
810714
810715
810716
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Strom NA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Battery
Compressor station
Fuel gas pipeline
Gathering line
Gas pipeline
Kananaskis Area
Moose field
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Water disposal
Water pipeline
Whiskey field
Atmospheric diffusion
Conflict
Disposal well
Economic analysis
Energy development
Environmental impact
ID-81-03
IL-80-24
Gas producing
Hydrogen sulphide
Land reclamation
Land use
NTS 82J
NTS 82O
Pipeline crossing
Pipeline design
Pipeline leak
Pipeline route
Recreational facility
Safety
Sulphur recovery
Waste disposal
Waste water
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Pipeline Act
Notes
ERCB Reort 82-E on application no. 810148 for a pipeline to transport sweet fuel gas from Quirk Creek Plant to proposed Whiskey and Moose compressor stations; on application no. 810149 for pipeline to to transport sour gas from proposed compressor to Quirk Creek plant; on application no. 810150 for pipeline to transport sour gas from wellheads to proposed Moose and Whiskey compressor stations; on application no. 810663 for a pipeline to transport sour water from proposed compressor station to an injection well; on application no. 810714 to construct a gas battery with dehydration and liquid separation facilities and one compressor (LSD 4-35-21-5, W5M); on application no. 810715 to construct gas battery with dehydration and liquid separation facilities and two compressors (LSD 13-22-22-6, W5); and on application no. 810716 to dispose of sour water produced from Moose and Whiskey fields by injection into Mississippian Turner Valley Fm; Board hearing 1982-01-06/07/08/09/10/13/14/15 & 1982-02-01; See related ERCB Decisions 82-3, 82-12 and Report 82-D; See also ERCB Decision D83-22 on later Shell application (No. 830603) for Board to reconsider decision contained in this report
Less detail

Decision 83-06

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2390
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
821207
Title
Decision on public meeting to consider concerns regarding the development of the proposed Saddle Ridge area
Date
1983
Title
Decision on public meeting to consider concerns regarding the development of the proposed Saddle Ridge area
Date
1983
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
821207
Hearing Panel
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Land use
Descriptors
Energy development
Land use
Regional planning
Risk
Saddleridge area
Sour gas
Urban development
Urban planning
Calgary area
Emergency procedure
Encroachment
ID-81-03
Gas pipeline
Gas producing
Gas reserve
Gas well
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 82P
Safety
Notes
Decision No. D83-6 on proceeding No. 821207 to consider concerns relating to development of Saddle Ridge area of NE Calgary; public meeting held 1983-01-25/26 & 1983-03-14/15
Interveners
City of Calgary Planning Department
Carma Developers Ltd.
Kentron Development Corporation Ltd.
Cathton Holdings
Qualico Developments
Oscar Fech Construction Ltd.
Longpre Associates
Manz, A.E.
219575 Alberta Ltd.
Saddle Ridge Community Association
Petrogas Processing Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 83-10|83-10 Addendum

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2388
Applicant
Voyager Petroleums Limited
Signalta Resources Limited
Application Number
821089
830012
830087
Title
Decision on application by Voyager Petroleums Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing in east-central Alberta); Decision on application by Signalta Resources Limited, 1983 (sour gas processing in east-central Alberta) (and addendum)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Voyager Petroleums Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing in east-central Alberta); Decision on application by Signalta Resources Limited, 1983 (sour gas processing in east-central Alberta) (and addendum)
Date
1983
Applicant
Voyager Petroleums Limited
Signalta Resources Limited
Application Number
821089
830012
830087
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Morin EJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Amine
Forestburg field
Gas processing
Gas processing plant
Heisler gas plant
Iron sponge process
Strome field
Air quality
Economic analysis
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
Flare
Health
Hydrogen sulphide removal
NTS 83A
Safety
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision D83-10 on application No. 821089 by Voyager to construct & operate sour gas processing facilities at its well in LSD 4-26-41-16 W4M and on application No. 830012 by Signalta for approval to expand the existing Heisler gas plant and install amine sweetening facilities in LSD 13-14-42-16 W4M and on application No. 830087 by Signalta to construct and operate an iron sponge sweetening unit at its well in LSD 10-31-42-15 W4M; Board hearing 1983-03-29/30; see also addendum to D83-10 which deals further with application No. 821089
Interveners
East Central Landholders Protective Association
Hastings Coulee Community
Warren Henderson Family
Henderson, W.
Robert Coulthard Family
Coulthard, R.
Fossen, E.
Fossen, R.
Art Hihn Family
Hihn, M.
Hihn, A.
Kroetsch, C.
Kroetsch, B.
The Town of Daysland
The Village of Forestburg
Aberan Angus Farm
Less detail

Decision 83-12

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2331
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
821137
Title
Decision on public inquiry to consider potential conflicts between development of sour gas reserves and residential development in the Okotoks area
Date
1983
Title
Decision on public inquiry to consider potential conflicts between development of sour gas reserves and residential development in the Okotoks area
Date
1983
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
821137
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Bohme VE
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Inquiry
Land use
Descriptors
Conflict
Energy development
Land use
Okotoks area
Regional planning
Risk
Sour gas
Urban development
Urban planning
Encroachment
Gas pipeline
Gas producing
Gas reserve
Gas well
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 82I
NTS 82J
Safety
Notes
Decision No. D83-12 (inquiry report) on proceeding No. 821137 regarding conflicts between the development of sour gas reserves and residential development in the Okotoks area covering TP.18-24, R.27 W4M to R.1 W5M;see also related Decision D83-13 on application No. 820346 (application by Canadian Occidental for sour gas processing plant in the Okotoks area); Board inquiry 1983-03-?
Interveners
Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd.
Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Ltd.
Bow North Surface Rights Association
City of Calgary
Canadian Occidental Petroleums Ltd.
Canadian Petroleum Association
Canadian Superior Oil Ltd.
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Committee for Toxic Pollutant Controls
Goldenview Farms Ltd.
J.M. Huber Corporation
Makale & Kyllo Planning Associates Ltd.
Mitchell Energy Corporation
Ollerenshaw, F.J.
Rocher, N.L.
Less detail

Decision 83-13

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1192
Applicant
Citadel Resources Ltd.
Scion Petroleum Engineering Limited
Application Number
830198
Title
Examiners report on application by Citadel Resources Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing plant Sundre area)
Date
1983
Title
Examiners report on application by Citadel Resources Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing plant Sundre area)
Date
1983
Applicant
Citadel Resources Ltd.
Scion Petroleum Engineering Limited
Application Number
830198
Hearing Panel
Homeniuk TF
Mazurek LA
Nichol JR
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Caroline field
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Hydrogen sulphide removal
Land value
Locating
Noise (sound)
NTS 82O
Pollution
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E83-13 on application No. 830198 by Scion Petroleum on behalf of Citadel for approval to construct a sour gas processing plant in LSD 3 of section 26, TP.33, R.6 W5M in the Caroline field.
Interveners
Dome Petroleum Limited
MHL & Associates Ltd.
Petersen, E.
Petersen, G.
Less detail

141 records – page 1 of 8.