71 records – page 1 of 4.

Decision 77-21

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2127
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
770118
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1977 (240 KV transmission line facilities in the Red Deer Calgary area)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1977 (240 KV transmission line facilities in the Red Deer Calgary area)
Date
1977
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
770118
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Calgary area
Red Deer area
Transmission line
Agricultural land
Capacity
Electric power demand
Electric power supply
Health
NTS 82P
NTS 83A
Right of way
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S13
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Notes
Decision 77-21 on application No. 770118 to construct and operate a 240 KV transmission line from the Red Deer substation (CP 63S) to a location 23.4 km north of the Janet substation (CP 74S).
Interveners
A Group of 35 Parties
Sackett, K.
Radau, F.
Latimer, M.E.
Bagrie, D.W.
Osterman, Mrs.
Less detail

Decision 78-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2112
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
780023
Title
Decision on inquiry into uncontrolled flow from the well Amoco Pacific Brazr 7-10-48-12 W5M in the Lodgepole Drayton Valley area, 1978
Date
1978
Title
Decision on inquiry into uncontrolled flow from the well Amoco Pacific Brazr 7-10-48-12 W5M in the Lodgepole Drayton Valley area, 1978
Date
1978
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
780023
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Kupchanko EE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Inquiry - Blowout
Descriptors
Blowout (well)
Blowout control
Drayton Valley area
Lodgepole blowout
Sour gas
Well killing
Air pollution
Case history
Inquiry
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 83G
Procedure
Safety
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S8.137
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S8.142
Notes
Decision 78-8 on proceeding No. 780023 to investigate an uncontrolled flow of sour gas from a well in LSD 7-10-48-12 W5M during a period from 1977-12-06 to 1978-01-02; Board inquiry 1978-02-22/23
Interveners
Alberta Disaster Services
Pacific Petroleum Ltd.
S&T Drilling (Northern) Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 80-A

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2328
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
780363
780589
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1980 500 KV transmission lines, Keephills - Ellerslie
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1980 500 KV transmission lines, Keephills - Ellerslie
Date
1980
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
780363
780589
Hearing Type
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Electric substation
Ellerslie area
High voltage
Lake Wabamun
Transmission line
Biological effect
Electric field
Electric power
Demand (economics)
Health
Locating
NTS 83G
NTS 83H
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S13
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
Notes
ERCB report 80-A on application No. 780363 and No. 780589 for permits to construct and operate two 500 KV transmission lines between Keephills generating station in Wabamun Lake area and proposed Ellerslie substation south of Edmonton (TP.50-52, R.23 W4M to R.5 W5M); Board hearing 1979-02-06 thru 1979-03-14 see also ERCB report 81-D for supplement to this Decision
Less detail

Decision 80-D

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2325
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
780709
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1980 500 KV transmission line Langdon - Phillips pass
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1980 500 KV transmission line Langdon - Phillips pass
Date
1980
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
780709
Hearing Type
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Calgary area
Crowsnest Pass
High voltage
Power system interconnection
Transmission line
Agricultural land
Alberta
British Columbia
Environmental impact
Health
Land use
NTS 82G
NTS 82H
NTS 82I
NTS 82J
Right of way
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S13
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
Notes
ERCB report 80-D on application No. 780709 to build and operate a 500 KV substation near Langdon and a transmission line linking the substation with B.C. Hydro at Phillipps Pass (TP.6-23, R.26 W4 to R.5 W5); Board hearing 1979-10-09 through 1979-11-02 (19 days), 1979-11-05/06/07/08/12/ see also ERCB report 82-A for Decision on proceeding No. 810326 to consider alternate points of interconnection with B.C. Hydro
Less detail

Decision 81-11

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1756
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
800503
Title
Examiners report on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1981 (138 KV transmission line Vauxhall - Taber)
Date
1981
Title
Examiners report on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1981 (138 KV transmission line Vauxhall - Taber)
Date
1981
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
800503
Hearing Panel
Bellows LA
Homeniuk TF
Miller KF
Hearing Type
Examiners
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Brooks area
Electric substation
Taber area
Transmission line
Electric power demand
Environmental impact
Health
Locating
NTS 82H
NTS 82I
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S13
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
Notes
ERCB Examiners report no.E81-11 on application No. 800503 to construct and operate a 138 KV transmission line between west Brooks substation CP 28S and Taber substation CP 83S and for approvals for Vauxhall substation CP158S (TP.10-13, R.16 W4M).
Interveners
Poynton, R.L.
214807 Holdings Ltd.
Rivers Cattle Ltd.
Town of Vauxhall
Less detail

Decision 82-21

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2057
Applicant
Inverness Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
810434
820033
Title
Decision on application by Inverness Petroleum Ltd., 1982 (approval of a gas processing plant and related gas gathering facilities in the Silver Valley area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Inverness Petroleum Ltd., 1982 (approval of a gas processing plant and related gas gathering facilities in the Silver Valley area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Inverness Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
810434
820033
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Gas processing plant
Gathering line
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Agricultural land
Air quality
Deposition
Emission
Environment protection
Environmental impact
Flare
Health
Livestock
Mathematical model
NTS 84D
Safety
Selenium
Soil analysis
Sulphur dioxide
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 82-21 on application No. 810434 to construct a gas plant in LSD 13-27-81-11 W6M and on application No. 820033 for related gas gathering and pipeline facilities; Board hearing 1982-03-22/23
Interveners
Josephine Environmental Protection Group
Rehaume AB
Umbach JE
Scobel K
Baxter DM
Travis KR
Phillips BM
Weiss K
Brown HD
Harpe R
Nagel H
National Farmers Union
Staton ME
Hendricks J
Johnstone AH
Alberta Environment
Liu CS
Defir J
Graveland D
Less detail

Decision 82-39

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2040
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
820308
Title
Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1982 (approval of a solution gas processing plant St. Albert area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1982 (approval of a solution gas processing plant St. Albert area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
820308
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Brushett ER
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Morinville field
Sour gas
St. Albert area
St. Albert-Big Lake field
Air quality
Atmospheric diffusion
Dissolved gas
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
Flare
Gas conservation
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
Land use
Locating
NTS 83H
Plant location
Safety
Sulphur dioxide
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision 82-39 on application No. 820308 to process sour solution gas from three batteries in the St. Albert-Big Lake field & Morinville field at an existing battery site in LSD 14-36-53-26 W4M; Board hearing 1982-10-06/07
Interveners
Silver Chief Community Gas Plant Committee
Genstar Land Development
Municipal District of Sturgeon No. 90
Helenslea Acres
Less detail

Decision 82-D

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2313
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
810520
810092
Title
Sour gas processing in Alberta : a review of evidence presented at recent ERCB hearings respecting the impacts and surveillance of sour gas plants
Date
1982
Title
Sour gas processing in Alberta : a review of evidence presented at recent ERCB hearings respecting the impacts and surveillance of sour gas plants
Date
1982
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
810520
810092
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Air pollution
Emission
Environmental impact
Gas processing
Nitrogen oxide
Soil pollution
Sour gas
Sulphur
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur dioxide removal
Sulphur recovery
Water pollution
Acidification
Airborne waste
Alberta
Deposition
Exhaust gas
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
Injection
Livestock
Monitoring
Selenium
Trace element
Underground
Waste disposal
Notes
ERCB report 82-D arising from hearing to consider application for sour gas processing at Jumping Pound and Quirk Creek gas plants and pipeline to connect Moose and Whiskey sour gas reserves to Quirk Creek plant. for Decisions on these applications see ERCB Decisions 82-3, 82-12 and report 82-E
Less detail

Decision 83-04

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1201
Applicant
Citadel Resources Ltd.
Scion Petroleum Engineering Limited
Application Number
820763
Title
Examiners report on application by Citadel Resources Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing plant Sundre area)
Date
1983
Title
Examiners report on application by Citadel Resources Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing plant Sundre area)
Date
1983
Applicant
Citadel Resources Ltd.
Scion Petroleum Engineering Limited
Application Number
820763
Hearing Panel
Homeniuk TF
Mazurek LA
Nichol JR
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Sundre area
Air pollution
Air quality
Design criteria
Emergency procedure
Emission
Health
Locating
Monitoring
Noise (sound)
NTS 82O
Plant location
Safety
Sulphur dioxide
Truck
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Examiners report E83-4 on application No. 820763 by Scion Petroleum & Gildex Ltd. on behalf of Citadel for approval to construct a sour gas processing plant in LSD 13-20-33-5 W5M; Examiners hearing 1982-10-27 adjourned to 1982-11-25
Interveners
Residents in the County of Mountainview
Alberda, R.
Less detail

Decision 83-10|83-10 Addendum

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2388
Applicant
Voyager Petroleums Limited
Signalta Resources Limited
Application Number
821089
830012
830087
Title
Decision on application by Voyager Petroleums Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing in east-central Alberta); Decision on application by Signalta Resources Limited, 1983 (sour gas processing in east-central Alberta) (and addendum)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Voyager Petroleums Ltd., 1983 (sour gas processing in east-central Alberta); Decision on application by Signalta Resources Limited, 1983 (sour gas processing in east-central Alberta) (and addendum)
Date
1983
Applicant
Voyager Petroleums Limited
Signalta Resources Limited
Application Number
821089
830012
830087
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Morin EJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Amine
Forestburg field
Gas processing
Gas processing plant
Heisler gas plant
Iron sponge process
Strome field
Air quality
Economic analysis
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
Flare
Health
Hydrogen sulphide removal
NTS 83A
Safety
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision D83-10 on application No. 821089 by Voyager to construct & operate sour gas processing facilities at its well in LSD 4-26-41-16 W4M and on application No. 830012 by Signalta for approval to expand the existing Heisler gas plant and install amine sweetening facilities in LSD 13-14-42-16 W4M and on application No. 830087 by Signalta to construct and operate an iron sponge sweetening unit at its well in LSD 10-31-42-15 W4M; Board hearing 1983-03-29/30; see also addendum to D83-10 which deals further with application No. 821089
Interveners
East Central Landholders Protective Association
Hastings Coulee Community
Warren Henderson Family
Henderson, W.
Robert Coulthard Family
Coulthard, R.
Fossen, E.
Fossen, R.
Art Hihn Family
Hihn, M.
Hihn, A.
Kroetsch, C.
Kroetsch, B.
The Town of Daysland
The Village of Forestburg
Aberan Angus Farm
Less detail

Decision 83-13

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2330
Applicant
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
820346
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., 1983 (Okotoks sour gas processing plant)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., 1983 (Okotoks sour gas processing plant)
Date
1983
Applicant
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Application Number
820346
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Bohme VE
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Conflict
Gas processing plant
Mazeppa gas plant
Okotoks field
Sour gas
Benefit cost analysis
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
ID-81-03
IL-80-24
Gas reserve
Health
Livestock
Locating
NTS 82I
Plant location
Safety
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Water supply
Water use
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision no.D83-13 on application No. 820346 for sour gas processing plant in the Mazeppa area of Okotoks field in section 3-20-28 W4M or section 35-19-28 W4M; see also Decision D83-12 on related proceeding No. 821137 (public inquiry to consider potential conflicts between development of sour gas reserves and residential development in the Okotoks area);Board hearing 1983-04-11/12/13/14/15/18
Interveners
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Committee for Toxic Pollutant Controls
Goldenview Farms Ltd.
Pan-Alberta Gas Ltd.
Rio Frio Ranch Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 83-20

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1185
Applicant
Consolidated Pipe Lines Company.
Application Number
830141
Title
Examiners report on application by Consolidated Pipe Lines Company, 1983 (gas processing plant Claresholm field)
Date
1983
Title
Examiners report on application by Consolidated Pipe Lines Company, 1983 (gas processing plant Claresholm field)
Date
1983
Applicant
Consolidated Pipe Lines Company.
Application Number
830141
Hearing Panel
Morin EJ
Brushett ER
Fox EG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Claresholm field
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Air quality
Community relations
Disposal well
Dissolved gas
Emission
Environmental impact
Flare
Gas conservation
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
Monitoring
NTS 82I
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E83-20 on application No. 830141 to construct and operate a sour gas processing plant at an existing well located in LSD 6-30-12-25 W4M; Examiners hearing 1983-09-06, 1983-10-12/13
Interveners
Drummond Oil & Gas Ltd.
Town of Claresholm
Oldman River Regional Planning Commission
East Claresholm Clean Air Association
Willow Creek Surface Rights Society
M.G. Mulholland Farms Ltd.
Berg, V.
Berg, D.
Darch, O.
Darch, D.
Deering, V.
Everl, D.
Eberl, F.
Finley, D.
Kruszewski, D.
Kruszewski, S.
Laing, A.
Laing, G.
Opp, F.
Opp, D.
Prusky, M.
Roemmele Farms Ltd.
Ulrich, H.
Weerstra, M.
Less detail

Decision 84-09

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1698
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
830007
Title
Decision report 84-09: Lodgepole blowout report (phase 1)
Date
1984
Title
Decision report 84-09: Lodgepole blowout report (phase 1)
Date
1984
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
830007
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Inquiry - Blowout
Descriptors
Blowout (well)
Blowout control
Brazeau River field
Lodgepole blowout
Sour gas
Well killing
Air pollution
Emission
Environmental impact
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 83G
Procedure
Recommendation
Sulphur dioxide
Notes
Decision D84-9 on proceeding No. 830007 (phase 1) on blowout of the well, Amoco Dome Brazeau River 13-12-48-12; 1 volume (main report, summary& recommendations, addendum; pamphlet-causes, effects, actions filed with 1984 Decisions); see Decision report D84-5 for phase 2 report
Interveners
Nabors Drilling Limited
Doyle TL
Berg E
Brown B
Randall W
Rode G
Alberta Government Departments
Alberta Agriculture
Christian RG
Beck BE
Klavano GG
Lillie LE
Walkey D
Alberta Forest Service Division of Energy and Natural Resources
Benson JE
Jaap EG
McFadyen AB
Fish and Wildlife Division of Energy and Natural Resources
Thompson G
Hunt CA
Smith K
Wig D
Occupational Health and Safety Division of Workers' Health, Safety and Compensation
Johnston BJ
Arnold I
MacPherson J
Ung E
Weiss A
Alberta Disaster Services
Egener IDM
Tyler E
Bennett B
Langman SR
Social Services and Community Health
Provincial Board of Health
Durkin SM
Bharnbhani Y
O'Laney JM
Orford RR
Rogers RE
Waters JR
Love EJ
Alberta Environment
Kupchanko EE
Briggs RN
Kostler JF
Sakiyama S
Schulz AR
Edmonton Area Respiratory Patient
May C
McPherson C
Semaka MG
Clanachan AS
Brown NE
Sarns C
Campbell W
Town of Drayton Valley
Mayhew R
Dykes I
Royal Canadian Mounted Police Drayton Valley Detachment
Bannerman L
County of Parkland No. 31
Steele R
Canadian Institute of Public Health Inspectors - Alberta Branch
Greenwood R
Hodge T
Alberta West Central Health Unit
Bayliss NJ
Public Advisory Committee to the Environment Council of Alberta
Kostuch MS
Behie SW
Guy PR
Johnson RL
Health Unit Association of Alberta
Shell Canada Resources Ltd.
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Canadian Petroleum Association
Independent Petroleum Association of Canada
Canadian Association of Oilwell Drilling Contractors
Environmental Law Centre
City of Edmonton
Edmonton Board of Health
Pembina Area Sour Gas Exposures Committee
Macintosh R
Baker D
Baker O
Grinde M
Strach C
Whitelock C
Elton W
Lodgepole Area Panel
Belair D
Nail L
Wentland T
Violet Grove Area Panel
C. Andersen
Bolianatz J
McGhee D
Buck Creek Area Panel
Rosell C
Rosell WD
Sackela R
Wasser A
Cynthia Area Panel
Beck R
Nichols D
Penner J
Easyford Area Panel
Huska D
Huska J
Kynoch B
Macintosh L
Vowk D
Drayton Valley Panel
Benger J
Gottschalk E
Guze O
Rowles J
Stewart J
Health Panel
Horstman L
Josephson KE
Cowdery R
Struzik E
Members of the Public
Luethi H
Henkle Mrs.
McConnen S
Beckett L
Gramlich D
Rosell W
Smeland L
Cavanagh C
Shirvell W
Welsh Mr.
Bosrnan A
Barnett Mr.
Hall E
Mallett L
Sams C
Less detail

Decision 84-20

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1156
Applicant
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Application Number
830725
Title
Examiners report on application by Texaco Canada Resources Ltd., 1984 (Open Creek gas processing plant)
Date
1984
Title
Examiners report on application by Texaco Canada Resources Ltd., 1984 (Open Creek gas processing plant)
Date
1984
Applicant
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Application Number
830725
Hearing Panel
Webber HJ
Bray JA
Homeniuk TF
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Open Creek field
Sour gas
Acidification
Air quality
Atmospheric diffusion
Basal Quartz Fm
Deposition
Emission
Environmental impact
Gas producing
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
Mathematical model
Monitoring
NTS 83B
Revision
Soil analysis
Selenium
Sulphur content
Sulphur dioxide
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E84-20 on application No. 830725 for approval to amend approval 3079 to increase the sulphur inlet rate to the open Creek gas plant located in LSD 10-34-42-5 W4M.
Interveners
Gibson, H.
Bauer, J.
Bauer, L.
Bryanton, W.
Eklund, C.
Eklund, P.
Less detail

Decision 84-20

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1748
Applicant
Bankeno Resources Ltd.
Application Number
840290
Title
Decision on application by Bankeno Resources Ltd., 1984 (application for approval of a gas processing plant Morinville field)
Date
1984
Title
Decision on application by Bankeno Resources Ltd., 1984 (application for approval of a gas processing plant Morinville field)
Date
1984
Applicant
Bankeno Resources Ltd.
Application Number
840290
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Morin EJ
Brushett ER
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Morinville field
Sour gas
Agricultural land
Deposition
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
Flare
Health
Land value
Locating
NTS 83H
Plant location
Sulphur dioxide
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision D84-20 on application No. 840290 to construct and operate a sour gas processing plant at an existing well site in LSD 11-15-55-25 W4M located in the Morinville field.
Interveners
South Morinville Clean Air Association
Pasay, D.
Pasay, I.
Boddez, A.
Boddez, S.
Municipal District of Sturgeon No. 90
Less detail

Decision 84-28

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1690
Applicant
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Application Number
830495
Title
Decision on application by Canterra Energy Ltd., 1984 (critical sour well in the Sundre area)
Date
1984
Title
Decision on application by Canterra Energy Ltd., 1984 (critical sour well in the Sundre area)
Date
1984
Applicant
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Application Number
830495
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Bergen area
Sour gas
Sundre area
Well licence
Blowout control
Blowout preventer
Casing string design
Drilling program
Emergency procedure
ID-81-03
Exploratory well
Gas producing
Gas well
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
Inspecting
Leduc Fm
NTS 82O
Marketing
Plugging
Producing well
Safety
Safety equipment
Solvent
Sulphur
Well classification
Notes
Decision D84-28 on application No. 830495 for a licence to drill a critical sour gas well in the Sundre area in LSD 12-12-32-6 W5M to evaluate and obtain production from the Leduc FM; Board hearing 1984-08-01/02/03/07/08/09/10/11
Interveners
Bergen Ratepayers Association
Inter-Varsity Christian Fellowship
Community of Fallen Timber
Town of Sundre
Mountain View Land Holders Group
City of Red Deer
Amoco Canada Petroleum Co. Ltd.
Burton, S.
Cloakey, G.E.
Goodwin, B.
Goodwin, M.
Grimstead, J.
Grimstead, C.
Halvorson, I.
Halvorson, M.
Worobetz, T.
Worobetz, M.
The Bauman Family
Bauman, Dr. J.A.
Haug, J.
Orr, J.
Huisman, Dr. R.
Newell, A.
Location
12-12-032-06W5
Less detail

Decision 84-B

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1695
Applicant
East Claresholm Clean Air Association
Title
Public meeting to consider concerns regarding an uncontrolled flow of sour gas and the operation of a sour gas plant in the Claresholm area
Date
1984
Title
Public meeting to consider concerns regarding an uncontrolled flow of sour gas and the operation of a sour gas plant in the Claresholm area
Date
1984
Applicant
East Claresholm Clean Air Association
Hearing Panel
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Inquiry
Descriptors
Air pollution
Blowout (well)
Blowout control
Claresholm area
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Air quality
Blowout preventer
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Evacuation
Gas well
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
Livestock
Monitoring
NTS 82H
NTS 82I
Planning
Safety
Soil analysis
Notes
Report on a public meeting regarding the sour gas well blowout (Drummond et al Claresholm 6-30-12-25 W4M) and ongoing concerns over the operation of the Claresholm sour gas processing plant located in the SW quarter of section 30-12-25 W4M; public meeting 1984-11-08
Less detail

Decision 85-17

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision830
Applicant
Dorchester Exploration Inc.
Application Number
850359
Title
Examiner report on application by Dorchester Exploration Inc., 1985 (proceeding on review of approval 4421 for a gas processing plant Benton field)
Date
1985
Title
Examiner report on application by Dorchester Exploration Inc., 1985 (proceeding on review of approval 4421 for a gas processing plant Benton field)
Date
1985
Applicant
Dorchester Exploration Inc.
Application Number
850359
Hearing Panel
Homeniuk TF
Mazurek LA
Dilay JD
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Benton field
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Emission
Environmental impact
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 72M
Safety
Sulphur dioxide
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E85-17 on application No. 850359 to review approval and application No. 840895 for gas processing plant to process sour gas at a well site in LSD 10-28-28-3 W4M.
Interveners
Evans, N.
Evens, H.
Bitz, V.
Bitz, S.
Moore, W.
Moore, H.
Crace, H.
Crace, B.
Smigelski, R.
Crossroads 9 & 41 Landholders Association
Location
10-28-028-03W4
Less detail

Decision 85-26

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision822
Applicant
Andex Oil Co. Limited
Application Number
850245
Title
Examiner report on application by Andex Oil Co. Ltd., 1985 (Highvale gas processing plant to amend Highvale gas plant approval)
Date
1985
Title
Examiner report on application by Andex Oil Co. Ltd., 1985 (Highvale gas processing plant to amend Highvale gas plant approval)
Date
1985
Applicant
Andex Oil Co. Limited
Application Number
850245
Hearing Panel
Dilay JD
Remmer WG
Schnitzler WJ
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Sour gas
Deposition
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
Expansion
Flare
Gas producing
Health
Hydrogen sulphide
Mathematical model
Monitoring
NTS 83G
Soil analysis
Sulphur content
Sulphur dioxide
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E85-26 on application No. 850245 to amend Board approval 3019 for Andex Highvale gas plant located in LSD 10-4-51-4 W5M to increase maximum raw gas inlet capacity, increase hydrogen sulphide inlet rate.
Interveners
Vanderwell, J.
Vanderwell, P.
Ewashko, J.
Lauder, V.
Less detail

Decision 86-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision775
Applicant
Hewitt Oil (Alberta) Ltd.
Application Number
850583
Title
Decision on application by Hewitt Oil (Alberta) Ltd., 1986 (gas processing plant, Golden Spike area)
Date
1986
Title
Decision on application by Hewitt Oil (Alberta) Ltd., 1986 (gas processing plant, Golden Spike area)
Date
1986
Applicant
Hewitt Oil (Alberta) Ltd.
Application Number
850583
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Bellows LA
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Golden Spike area
Sour gas
Air quality
Edmonton area
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Health
Hydrogen sulphide removal
Land value
Locating
Monitoring
NTS 83G
NTS 83H
Pipeline accident
Plant location
Safety
Sulphur recovery
Notes
Decision D86-3 on application No. 850583 for Hewitt Oil to build a small sour gas plant in the Golden Spike area in TP.51, R.27, W4M; Board hearing 1986-01-22/23/24
Interveners
Golden Spike Environmental Protection Society
Parkland Rural Residents Association
SAGE Institute of Canada Inc.
Murray, J.C.
Murray, M.K.
Fiertel, N.
Matthews, R.J.
Esso Resources Canada Limited
MacIntosh, C.S.
MacIntosh, M.E.
Millette, S.
Voogel, R.
Nagy, Mrs.
Less detail

71 records – page 1 of 4.