51 records – page 1 of 3.

Decision 78-12

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2108
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
770891
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1978 (approval to construct and operate an ash lagoon for disposing ash at the Keephills power plant)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1978 (approval to construct and operate an ash lagoon for disposing ash at the Keephills power plant)
Date
1978
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
770891
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
Goodman CJ
Solodzuk W
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Electric power
Descriptors
Ash
Electric power project
Keephills power project
Settling pond
Waste disposal
Cost analysis
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Groundwater
NTS 83G
Reclamation
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S40
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S7
Notes
Decision 78-12 on application No. 770891 to develop a recirculating water slurry system and ash lagoon for disposing of ash at the Keephills power plant (TP.51-52, R.3-4, W5M).
Interveners
Committee on Keephills Environment
Less detail

Decision 82-32

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1120
Applicant
Voyager Petroleums Limited
Application Number
820693
Title
Examiners report on application by Voyager Petroleums Limited, 1982 (gas processing plant Killam north field)
Date
1982
Title
Examiners report on application by Voyager Petroleums Limited, 1982 (gas processing plant Killam north field)
Date
1982
Applicant
Voyager Petroleums Limited
Application Number
820693
Hearing Panel
Edgecombe RW
Pearson DG
Remmer WG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Killam north field
Sour gas
Contamination
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
Flare
Gathering line
Groundwater
Iron sponge process
NTS 73D
Pipeline corrosion
Safety
Waste disposal
Water pollution
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E82-32 on application No. 820693 to construct & operate a gas sweetening facility at Voyager's compressor station located in the SW quarter of section 5-45-12 W4M.
Interveners
Wylie, D.
Bricker, L.
Bricker, Mrs.
Less detail

Decision 83-21

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1184
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
830371
Title
Examiners report on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1983 (experimental scheme for enhanced oil recovery by Alkaline solution injection Viking Kinsella Wainwright B pool)
Date
1983
Title
Examiners report on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1983 (experimental scheme for enhanced oil recovery by Alkaline solution injection Viking Kinsella Wainwright B pool)
Date
1983
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
830371
Hearing Panel
Bellows LA
Stafford GH
Sharp KG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Enhanced recovery
Descriptors
Caustic waterflooding
Enhanced recovery scheme
Viking Kinsella field
Viscous oil recovery
Contamination
Environmental impact
Groundwater
Injection pressure
Injection well
Monitoring
NTS 73E
Pilot scale
Wainwright Fm
Water supply
Water use
Water well
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E83-21 on application No. 830371 for approval of an experimental scheme for enhanced oil recovery by alkaline solution injection in part of the Viking-Kinsella Wainwright B pool in section 17-48-8 W4M; Examiners hearing 1983-10-18/19
Interveners
Buffalo Creek Water Resources Environmental Association
Nydokus, M.
Nydokus, R.R.
Less detail

Decision 83-A

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2466
Applicant
McLeod River Coal Ltd.
Application Number
820294
Title
Decision on application by McLeod River Coal Ltd., 1983 (McLeod River coal project, Hinton)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by McLeod River Coal Ltd., 1983 (McLeod River coal project, Hinton)
Date
1983
Applicant
McLeod River Coal Ltd.
Application Number
820294
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Strom NA
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Coal
Descriptors
Coal mine
Coal preparation plant
Coal project
Coalspur coal field
Hinton area
McLeod River coal project
Surface mining
Air quality
Bituminous coal
Capitalized cost
Coal reserve
Cost analysis
Design criteria
Drainage
Dust control
Economic analysis
Employment
Environment protection
Environmental impact
Groundwater
Land reclamation
Land use
Manpower
Marketing
Mine design
NTS 83F
Open pit mining
Operating cost
Overburden ratio
Railroad
Reforestation
Socio-economic effect
Soil conservation
Tailings
Tailings - storage
Terminal facility
Thermal coal
Transportation corridor
Waste disposal
Water quality
Legal References
Coal Conservation Act S10
Coal Conservation Act S23
Notes
ERCB report D83-A on application No. 820294 to develop a surface coal mine in TP.49-51, R.21-23, W5 to extract high volatile C bituminous coal from NW portion of Coalspur coal field and to construct a coal processing plant in TP.51-52, R23-24, W5; Board hearing 1982-08-24/25/26/27
Less detail

Decision 84-26

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1699
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
840498
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1984 (Peace River expansion project)
Date
1984
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1984 (Peace River expansion project)
Date
1984
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
840498
Hearing Panel
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cyclic steam injection
In situ
Peace River area
Peace River in situ project
Produced water
Steam flooding
Steam injection
Oil sands project
Oil sands oil recovery
Thermal recovery
Bluesky Fm
Bullhead Gp
Contamination
Environmental impact
Expansion
Groundwater
NTS 84C
Oil producing
Pollution control
Recycling
Socio-economic effect
Water disposal
Water producing
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
Decision D84-26 on application No. 840498 for approval of a commercial scheme involving the expansion OS Shell's current Peace River in situ project under Board approval 2485 (TP.85, R.18, W5M) to recover bitumen from the Peace River Bluesky Bullhead oil sands deposit (Peace River expansion project); Board hearing 1984-09-11/12
Interveners
BP Resources Canada Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Lesser Slave Lake Indian Regional Council
Whitefish Lake Indian Band
Duncan's Band
Lubicon Lake Band
Native Members of the Cree Community of Little Buffalo Lake
Mackenzie Regional Planning Commission
Less detail

Decision 85-07

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1685
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Application Number
840736
840986
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1985 (reduced well spacing and cleaning plant Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1985 (reduced well spacing and cleaning plant Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Application Number
840736
840986
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Spacing
Descriptors
Drilling spacing unit
In situ
Industrial plant
Lindbergh area
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Bitumen
Cleaning
Community relations
Contamination
Cummings Fm
Directional well
Environmental impact
Groundwater
Monitoring
Noise (sound)
NTS 73E
Oil pipeline
Solid hydrocarbon
Transportation
Truck
Water disposal
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.002
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.030
Notes
Decision D85-7 on application No. 840736 and No. 840986 to reduce well spacing for primary recovery from Cummings zone-Cold Lake-Wabiskaw-McMurray oil sands deposit and to construct and operate a cleaning plant to handle hydrocarbon production trucked from various PanCanadian wells (in section 3-56-6 W4M); Board hearing 84-12-11/12; resulted in Order No. Misc 8501
Interveners
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Shymkiw, J.
Shymkiw, Mrs.J.
Shymkiw, H.
Shymikiw, Mrs.H.
Kozicky, C.
Kozicky, Mrs.C.
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Group of Elk Point-Lindbergh Area Residents
Town of Elk Point
County of St. Paul
Less detail

Decision 85-16

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1678
Applicant
Luchyk (William)
Application Number
850170
Title
Decision on application by Luchyk (William), 1985 (review of Husky Oil Operations Ltd. remedial cementing program)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Luchyk (William), 1985 (review of Husky Oil Operations Ltd. remedial cementing program)
Date
1985
Applicant
Luchyk (William)
Application Number
850170
Hearing Panel
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Abandonment
Descriptors
Cementing
Groundwater
Water pollution
Water quality
Well workover
Wildmere field
Monitoring
NTS 73E
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision D85-16 on application No. 850170 for review of approved Husky oil remedial cementing program for well "Husky et al Wildmere 5C-18-4" S7-4 (W4M) as part of well abandonment program.
Interveners
Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 85-42

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision968
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
850428
850798
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Commercial oil sands project and water disposal scheme Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Commercial oil sands project and water disposal scheme Lindbergh sector)
Date
1985
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
850428
850798
Hearing Panel
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Homeniuk TF
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Oil sands
Descriptors
Cyclic steam injection
Dome Lindbergh project
In situ
Lindbergh area
Produced water
Steam injection
Oil sands oil recovery
Oil sands project
Thermal recovery
Water disposal
Agricultural land
Air quality
Cummings Fm
Directional well
Disposal well
Emission
Environmental impact
Groundwater
Land reclamation
Locating
Monitoring
NTS 73E
Noise (sound)
Planning
Pollution
Recycling
Waste disposal
Water producing
Water supply
Legal References
Oil Sands Conservation Act S10
Notes
Decision D85-42 on application No. 850428 and 850798 by Dome on behalf of itself & its partners Sulpetro and CNG producing Company for a commercial oil sands deposit in TP.53-56, R.4-6, W4M and water disposal scheme, Lindbergh sector (being an expansion of current experimental project to commercial scale); Board hearing 1984-11-04/05/06
Interveners
Miller, L.
Kozicky, C.
Melnyk, A.
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Town of Elk Point
Westmin Resources Limited
Less detail

Decision 86-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision776
Applicant
Diamond Shamrock Exploration of Canada Ltd.
Application Number
860346
Title
Decision on application by Diamond Shamrock Exploration of Canada Ltd., 1986 (well licence Pembina field)
Date
1986
Title
Decision on application by Diamond Shamrock Exploration of Canada Ltd., 1986 (well licence Pembina field)
Date
1986
Applicant
Diamond Shamrock Exploration of Canada Ltd.
Application Number
860346
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Webber HJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Pembina field
Well licence
Cardium Fm
Contamination
Directional well
Environmental impact
Groundwater
Locating
NTS 83G
Producing equipment
Water well
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
Decision D86-8 on application No. 860346 for Diamond Shamrock to drill a directional well into Cardium FM in the Pigeon Lake area in LSD 10-9-47-1 W5M.
Location
10-09-047-01W5
Less detail

Decision 87-21

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision169
Applicant
Skimmer Oil Separators Ltd.
Application Number
871196
Title
Decision on application by Skimmer Oil Separators Ltd., 1987 (waste processing and disposal facility Lloydminster field)
Date
1987
Title
Decision on application by Skimmer Oil Separators Ltd., 1987 (waste processing and disposal facility Lloydminster field)
Date
1987
Applicant
Skimmer Oil Separators Ltd.
Application Number
871196
Hearing Panel
Goodman CJ
Prince JP
Brushett ER
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Oil waste
Waste disposal
Waste oil recovery
Waste treatment
Groundwater
Environmental impact
Noise (sound)
NTS 73E
Water supply
Truck
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.002
Notes
Decision D87-21 on application No. 871196 for approval to construct and operate a waste processing and disposal facility in LSD 14-31-51-2 W4M; exhibits D3-D6 consisting of four samples from geology pit and field tank are filed in the library (kept in locked drawer that houses the ARC Documents)
Interveners
Blair, H.
Blair, L.
Corr, H.
Marwayne Support Group
Behnke, B.
Butler, L.
Cooke, R.
Hines, L.
Inge, S.
Johnson, A.
Johnson, R.
Kent, T.
Luchyk, B.
Nohnychuk, R.
Taylor, L.
Young, R.
Lloydminster Heavy Crude Services Ltd.
Sunrise Well Services Ltd.
Ro-Vac Pump Truck Services
Temor Oil Services
Home Oil Co. Ltd.
Wilson, W.H.
Location
14-31-051-02W4
Less detail

Decision 88-17

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision117
Applicant
Renaissance Energy Ltd.
Application Number
882000
Title
Examiner report on application by Renaissance Energy Ltd., 1988 (well licence LSD 11-5-62-4 W5M)
Date
1988
Title
Examiner report on application by Renaissance Energy Ltd., 1988 (well licence LSD 11-5-62-4 W5M)
Date
1988
Applicant
Renaissance Energy Ltd.
Application Number
882000
Hearing Panel
Berndtsson NG
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Fort Kent field
Well licence
Agricultural land
Colony Fm
Directional drilling
Environmental impact
Gas well
Groundwater
Locating
NTS 73L
Safety
Well site
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E88-17 on application No. 882000 for a licence to drill a well in LSD 11-5-62-4 W4M to obtain production from the Colony member.
Interveners
Shalka, L.
Shalka, E.R.
Lazar, J.
Location
11-05-062-04W4
Less detail

Decision 89-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision108
Applicant
Renaissance Energy Ltd.
Application Number
890726
Title
Examiner report on application by Renaissance Energy Ltd., 1989 (well licence LSD 11-5-62-4 W5M)
Date
1989
Title
Examiner report on application by Renaissance Energy Ltd., 1989 (well licence LSD 11-5-62-4 W5M)
Date
1989
Applicant
Renaissance Energy Ltd.
Application Number
890726
Hearing Panel
Homeniuk TF
Schnitzler WJ
Dunn GC
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Fort Kent field
Well licence
Agricultural land
Colony Fm
Directional drilling
Environmental impact
Gas well
Groundwater
Locating
NTS 73L
Safety
Well site
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E89-5 on application no. 890726 for a licence to drill a well in lsd 11-5-62-4 W4 to obtain production from the Colony Member; Examiners hearing held 1989-08-01/02
Interveners
Shalka, E.R.
Shalka, L.E.
Municipal District of Bonneyville
Location
11-05-062-04W4
Less detail

Decision 89-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision124
Applicant
Strathfield Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
890574
890576
890577
890578
890579
890795
890796
890797
890798
890799
890800
890801
890802
890803
Title
Decision 89-08 : Strathfield Oil and Gas Ltd.: Application for well licences, Provost field
Date
1989
Title
Decision 89-08 : Strathfield Oil and Gas Ltd.: Application for well licences, Provost field
Date
1989
Applicant
Strathfield Oil and Gas Ltd.
Application Number
890574
890576
890577
890578
890579
890795
890796
890797
890798
890799
890800
890801
890802
890803
Hearing Panel
Strom NA
Morin EJ
Langlo CA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Provost field
Well licence
Agricultural land
Air quality
Aquifer
Battery
Communication
Community relations
Cretaceous
Development well
Dina member
Drilling fluid
Drilling waste disposal
Emission
Energy development
Environmental impact
Groundwater
Hydrogen sulphide
Land use
Mannville Gp
NTS 73D
Oil well
Reservoir boundary
Spill
Sulphur dioxide
Water pollution
Water quality
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
ERCB decision D89-8 on applications no. 890574, 890576-890579, 890795-890803 for licences to drill wells all in Tp.37, R.4, W4; Board hearing 1989-06-27/28
Interveners
Hanson, R.
Less detail

Decision 90-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision85
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
Application Number
890971
890969
891504
891505
891506
891478
891479
891480
891481
891482
891568
891569
891570
891571
900404
891483
891290
900236
891047
891757
891805
891804
891803
891703
891802
Title
Decision 90-08 : Shell Canada Limited and Husky Oil Operations Ltd.: Application for Caroline Beaverhill Lake gas development
Date
1990
Title
Decision 90-08 : Shell Canada Limited and Husky Oil Operations Ltd.: Application for Caroline Beaverhill Lake gas development
Date
1990
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
Application Number
890971
890969
891504
891505
891506
891478
891479
891480
891481
891482
891568
891569
891570
891571
900404
891483
891290
900236
891047
891757
891805
891804
891803
891703
891802
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Mink FJ
Bietz BF
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Caroline field
Caroline gas project
Energy development
Gas pipeline
Gas processing plant
Pipeline construction permit
Product pipeline
Sour gas
Sulphur recovery plant
Bearberry field
Benefit cost analysis
Carbon dioxide
Capitalized cost
Claus process
Conservation
Economic analysis
Emergency procedure
Emission
Environmental impact
ID-81-03
ID-88-01
Feasibility
Forecasting
Groundwater
Nitrogen oxide
Noise (sound)
NTS 82O
NTS 83B
Operating cost
Petroleum conservation
Public interest
Reliability
Safety
Socio-economic effect
Soil conservation
Soil pollution
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Water disposal
Water pollution
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S4
Notes
Decision D90-8 on proceeding No. 890971 and on applications by Shell, Husky and associated parties for production, processing and transportation facilities for sour gas reserves in the Caroline Beaverhill Lake area (all in TP.31-36, R.3-10 W5M); Board hearing commenced 1990-04-17 and continued to 1990-05-10 with final argument 1990-05-28/29
Interveners
Federated Pipe Lines Ltd.
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Altana Exploration Company
ATCOR Ltd.
Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
Gulf Canada Resources Limited
Mobil Oil Canada
NOVA Corporation of Alberta
Numac Oil & Gas Ltd.
Union Pacific Resources Inc.
CN Rail
CP Rail
Alberta Fish and Game Association
Pollution Sub-Committee of the Public Advisory Committees - Environment Council of Alberta
Bauman, J.
Bauman, L.
Brown, R.
McCormick, H.
Brunner, J.
Brunner, L.
Heggie, R.
Burnstick Lake Cottage Owners' Association
Caroline Advisory Board
Caroline & District Chamber of Commerce
Concerned Residents Action Group
County of Mountain View No. 17
Diamond J. Industries Ltd.
Harris, D.
Harris, M.
Hermann, J.
Jans, E.
Jans, B.
Kostuch , M.
Rocky Veterinary Clinic Ltd.
Macklin, J.
Macklin, B.
Mountain View Land Holders Group
Olds& District Chamber of Commerce
Preservation of Agriculture and Living Space Society
Rocky Mountain House & District Chamber of Commerce
Roth, L.
Roth, S.
Saunders, D.
447 Area Residents
Sundre & District Chamber of Commerce
Town of Innisfail
Town of Sundre
Town of Rocky Mountain House
Village of Caroline
Wolf, R.E.
Less detail

Decision 90-17|90-17 Addendum

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision66
Applicant
Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
Application Number
891183
Title
Decision 90-17 : Husky Oil Operations Ltd.: Application for a permit for subsurface disposal of produced water, Fisher area (and addendum)
Date
1990
Title
Decision 90-17 : Husky Oil Operations Ltd.: Application for a permit for subsurface disposal of produced water, Fisher area (and addendum)
Date
1990
Applicant
Husky Oil Operations Ltd.
Application Number
891183
Hearing Panel
Prince JP
Bietz BF
Remmer WG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Water disposal
Descriptors
Caribou Lake project
Cold Lake area
Cold Lake heavy oil project
Disposal well
Groundwater
Produced water
Subsurface
Water disposal
Cambrain Fm
Clearwater Fm
Decision D1979-3
Keg River Fm
McMurray Fm
Migration
Monitoring
NTS 74D
Recycling
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision D90-17 on application No. 891183 to dispose of water produced from its Caribou Lake experimental scheme in the Fisher area by injection into the Keg River FM through the well Husky AEC Fisher 8D-12-69-5 and in the event the Keg River FM cannot meet requirements, into the McMurray FM through the 8D-12 well and the well, Husky AEC SWD Fisher 9-12-69-5, both wells are located W4M; addendum dated 1991-05-02, clarifies Husky's interpretation of its views regarding the subsurface disposal of produced water into the McMurray zone
Interveners
Cold Lake Community Advisory Committee
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Location
08-12-069-05W4
09-12-069-05W4
Less detail

Decision 91-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision65
Applicant
Polaris Petroleums Ltd.
Application Number
910018
Title
Decision 91-01 : Polaris Petroleums Ltd.: Application for a well licence
Date
1991
Title
Decision 91-01 : Polaris Petroleums Ltd.: Application for a well licence
Date
1991
Applicant
Polaris Petroleums Ltd.
Application Number
910018
Hearing Panel
Mink FJ
Bietz BF
Berndtsson NG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Provost field
Well licence
Air quality
Battery
Citizen participation
Community relations
Dina member
Directional well
Environmental impact
Exploratory well
Groundwater
Land reclamation
Oil producing
NTS 73D
Surface rights
Well site
Well spacing
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
Decision D91-1 on application No. 910018 for a licence to drill a well from a surface location in Lsd 5 Sec 31 Twp 37 Rge 3 W4M to obtain oil production from the Dina FM.
Interveners
Nelson, W.P.
Location
05-31-037-03W4
Less detail

Decision 91-10|91-10 addendum

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision50
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
Application Number
910777
Title
Decision 91-10 : Norcen Energy Resources Limited : Application for a well licence, Provost field (and addendum)
Date
1991
Title
Decision 91-10 : Norcen Energy Resources Limited : Application for a well licence, Provost field (and addendum)
Date
1991
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Norcen Energy Resources Ltd.
Application Number
910777
Hearing Panel
Mink FJ
Langlo CA
Remmer WG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Provost field
Well licence
Directional drilling
Environmental impact
Groundwater
Lloydminster Fm
Locating
NTS 73D
Oil producing
Noise (sound)
Road construction
Safety
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
Decision D91-10 on application No. 910777 for a licence to drill a well for a surface location in Lsd 6 Sec 32 Twp 38 Rge 3 W4M to a bottom-hole location in Lsd 15 Sec 32 Twp 38 Rge 3 W4M to obtain oil production from the Lloydminster FM; addendum to D91-10 issued 1991-11-21 identifies two errors in D91-10 and clarifies same
Interveners
Nelson, W.P.
Location
06-32-038-03W4
15-32-038-03W4
Less detail

Decision 95-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2530
Applicant
Petro-Canada
Application Number
940609
940610
940718
940918
940919
940920
940921
940922
940930
Title
Decision 95-02 : Petro-Canada : Application for a coalbed methane (CBM) project in the Battle Lake area
Date
1995
Title
Decision 95-02 : Petro-Canada : Application for a coalbed methane (CBM) project in the Battle Lake area
Date
1995
Applicant
Petro-Canada
Application Number
940609
940610
940718
940918
940919
940920
940921
940922
940930
Hearing Panel
Prince JP
Remmer WG
Fox EG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Coalbed methane
Descriptors
Coalbed methane
Natural gas
Battle Lake area
Compressor station
Well licence
Pipeline
Experimentation
IL-91-11
Public relations
Land use
Noise (sound)
Wildlife
Water disposal
Groundwater
Upper Mannville Fm
NTS 83B
Notes
Decision on applications for a Coalbed Methane Project in the Battle Lake Area, to drill five wells, produce gas from Upper Mannville Formation coals and operate a compressor station at Section 18 of Township 46, Range 1 W5M, and to construct 0.18 kilometres of pipeline to transmit sweet natural gas to a Nova lateral pipeline.
Interveners
Battle Lake Area Concerned Residents Group
Alberg B
Alberg K
Bergen B
Brunner D
Dahler J
Doze D
Hyam A
Hyam G
Korving A
Phippen J
Reeves BOK
Renschler A
Riddett R
Soderstrom L
Wallis C
Weyer KU
Bauman R
Dennehy C
Lawson R
Location
10-18-046-01W5
Less detail

Decision 95-12|95-12 Addendum

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2855
Applicant
Hanson, Roy
Fletcher Challenge Petroleum Inc.
Application Number
950816
Title
Decision 95-12 Addendum : Roy Hanson : Application to review well licences Nos. 177513, 17514, 177516, 177518 granted to Fletcher Challenge Petroleum Inc. in Provost Field
Date
1995
Title
Decision 95-12 Addendum : Roy Hanson : Application to review well licences Nos. 177513, 17514, 177516, 177518 granted to Fletcher Challenge Petroleum Inc. in Provost Field
Date
1995
Applicant
Hanson, Roy
Fletcher Challenge Petroleum Inc.
Application Number
950816
Hearing Panel
Bietz BF
Miller GJ
MacDonald NW
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Well licence
Provost field
Environmental impact
Groundwater
Land reclamation
NTS 73D
Site survey
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S42
Energy Resources Conservation Act S43
Notes
EUB Decision D95-12 on application No. 950816 by Roy Hanson to review well licences Nos. 177513, 177514, 177516, 177518 as granted to Fletcher Challenge Petroleum Inc. for four wells at Lsd 13 Sec 23 Twp 37 Rge 4W4 and at Lsd 5 Sec 26 Twp 37 Rge 4 W4M Provost Field. Decision D95-12 issued 1995-09-14 reaffirming licences; report issued as Addendum 1995-11-03
Location
13-23-037-04W4
05-26-037-04W4
Less detail

Decision 95-16

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2555
Applicant
High Bullen Energy Ltd.
Application Number
951628
Title
Examiner report on application by High Bullen Energy Ltd., 1995 (application for a well licence Ferrier Area)
Date
1995
Title
Examiner report on application by High Bullen Energy Ltd., 1995 (application for a well licence Ferrier Area)
Date
1995
Applicant
High Bullen Energy Ltd.
Application Number
951628
Hearing Panel
Lillo HO
Asgar-Deen ML
Willard RJ
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Well licence
Ferrier area
Environmental impact
Groundwater
Water quality
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
Examiners report on application by High Bullen Energy Ltd. for a well licence in the Ferrier Area, at Lsd 14 Sec 17 Twp 38 Rge 6 W5M to re-enter the existing abandoned well ESSO et al Ferrier 14-17-38-6 to produce sweet gas from the Rock Creek Formation through the existing cased wellbore.
Interveners
Krabben, B.
Krabben, F.
Location
14-14-038-06W5
Less detail

51 records – page 1 of 3.