32 records – page 1 of 2.

Decision 75-14

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2165
Applicant
Mobil Oil Canada Ltd.
Application Number
8547
Title
Decision on application by Mobil Oil Canada Ltd., 1975 (rateable take of gas from the Ricinus D-3A pool and declaration of the gathering line from Ricinus D-3A pool to the Ram River gas plant and the fuel gas line from the Ricinus gas plant to the Ricinus D-3A pool as common carriers)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Mobil Oil Canada Ltd., 1975 (rateable take of gas from the Ricinus D-3A pool and declaration of the gathering line from Ricinus D-3A pool to the Ram River gas plant and the fuel gas line from the Ricinus gas plant to the Ricinus D-3A pool as common carriers)
Date
1975
Applicant
Mobil Oil Canada Ltd.
Application Number
8547
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Rateable take
Common carrier
Descriptors
Common carrier
Rateable take of gas
Ricinus field
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas producing
Gathering line
NTS 83B
Unit operation
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S35
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S49
Notes
Decision 75-14 on application No. 8547 for rateable take of gas from the Ricinus D-3A pool and for the declaration of the gathering line from the pool to the Ram River gas plant and the fuel gas line from the plant to the pool as common carrier.
Interveners
Pacific Petroleums Ltd.
Chevron Standard Limited
Consolidated Natural Gas Liimited
Gulf Oil Canada Limited
Less detail

Decision 76-15

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2149
Applicant
Texasgulf Inc.
Application Number
9183
9184
Title
Decision on application by Texasgulf Inc., 1976 (secondary lines for transmission of fuel gas and sour gas Okotoks area)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Texasgulf Inc., 1976 (secondary lines for transmission of fuel gas and sour gas Okotoks area)
Date
1976
Applicant
Texasgulf Inc.
Application Number
9183
9184
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Bohme VE
Macleod NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Okotoks field
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Hydrogen sulphide
Land use
Land value
NTS 82I
Pipeline accident
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S29
Energy Resources Conservation Act S34
Notes
Decision 76-15 on application No. 9183 to construct a secondary line to transport fuel gas from LSD 10-31-20-28 W4M to LSD 11-20-20-28 W4M and on application No. 9184 for a line to transport sour gas from LSD 11-20-20-28 W4M to the Okotoks gas plant (in LSD 14-36-20-29 W4M).
Interveners
Leduc, A.S.
Long, K.
Municipal District of Foothills
Rio Frio Ranch Ltd.
Sheep Creek Developments Limited
Less detail

Decision 77-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2140
Applicant
Petrogas Processing Ltd.
Application Number
9483
9484
Title
Decision on application by Petrogas Processing Ltd., 1977 (resumption' of operation of secondary lines for the transmission of sour gas, fuel gas, formation water, lean glycol, rich glycol and tracing water)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Petrogas Processing Ltd., 1977 (resumption' of operation of secondary lines for the transmission of sour gas, fuel gas, formation water, lean glycol, rich glycol and tracing water)
Date
1977
Applicant
Petrogas Processing Ltd.
Application Number
9483
9484
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Sour gas
Emergency procedure
NTS 82P
Pipeline route
Safety
Urban development
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 77-8 on application No. 9483 to resume operation of pipelines (all in TP.24, R.24-29, W4M) to transport sour gas and to transport sweet fuel gas, formation water, lean glycol, rich glycol and tracing water and on application No. 9494 to install dual emergency shutdown valves at 3 locations.
Interveners
Garden Heights community residents
Argyle Holdings Ltd.
Hillcrest Investments Ltd.
Parkland Drywall Ltd.
All Investments Ltd.
Ark Holdings Ltd.
Law Investments Ltd.
Rideau Investments Ltd.
Olympic Construction Co. Ltd.
City of Calgary
Less detail

Decision 77-27

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2121
Applicant
Aquitaine Company of Canada Limited
Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Limited
Application Number
770164
770340
770341
770342
Title
Decision on application by Aquitaine Company of Canada Ltd. and Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Ltd., 1977 (gas processing plant and pipelines in the Stolberg area)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Aquitaine Company of Canada Ltd. and Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Ltd., 1977 (gas processing plant and pipelines in the Stolberg area)
Date
1977
Applicant
Aquitaine Company of Canada Limited
Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Limited
Application Number
770164
770340
770341
770342
Hearing Panel
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Gas processing plant
Pipeline construction permit
Stolberg field
Sour gas
Conservation
Economic analysis
Energy development
Environmental impact
Gas reserve
NTS 83B
NTS 83C
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 77-27 on application No. 770164 by Amerada to construct a sour gas processing plant in LSD 2-8-41-13 (W5) and on application No. 770340 by Aquitaine to construct a pipeline to transport sour gas and on application No. 770341 by Aquitaine to construct a pipeline to transport condensate both from a point in LSD 2-3-41-14 W5 to a point in LSD 11-2-37-10 W4 and on application No. 770342 by Aquitaine to construct a pipeline to transport fuel gas from the Ram River plant (LSD 11-2-37-10 W5) to a dehydration plant in LSD 2-3-41-14 W5; Board hearing 1977-09-20/21
Interveners
Mobil Oil Canada Ltd.
Chevron Standard Limited
Bearcat Exploration Ltd.
Cree Lake Mining Ltd.
The Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Gulf Oil Canada Limited
BP Exploration Canada Limited
Less detail

Decision 80-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2037
Applicant
Texasgulf Inc.
Application Number
780293
780647
780646
780276
790591
780275
Title
Decision on application by Texasgulf Inc., 1980 (licence to drill a well and permits to construct or resume operation of five pipelines in the Okotoks area)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Texasgulf Inc., 1980 (licence to drill a well and permits to construct or resume operation of five pipelines in the Okotoks area)
Date
1980
Applicant
Texasgulf Inc.
Application Number
780293
780647
780646
780276
790591
780275
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Okotoks area
Okotoks field
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Well licence
Crossfield Fm
Emergency procedure
Environmental impact
ID-79-02
Gas well
Land value
NTS 82I
Pipeline route
Right of way
Safety
Notes
Decision 80-1 on application No. 780293 to drill a well in LSD 11-1-22-29 W4M to evaluate & obtain production down to Crossfield FM, No. 780647 for pipeline to transport sour gas, No. 780646 for fuel gas pipeline, No. 780276 for pipeline to transport sour gas, No. 790591 for fuel gas pipeline and No. 780275 to resume operation of pipeline to transport sour gas.
Interveners
Carman, D.K.
Klaver, K.
Klaver, Mrs.
Heschl, B.
Heschl, Mrs.
Uragi, K.
Less detail

Decision 80-04

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2035
Applicant
Mitchell Energy Corporation
Application Number
790670
790650
790651
Title
Decision on application by Mitchell Energy Corporation, 1980 (licence to drill a well and permits to construct two pipelines in the Okotoks area)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Mitchell Energy Corporation, 1980 (licence to drill a well and permits to construct two pipelines in the Okotoks area)
Date
1980
Applicant
Mitchell Energy Corporation
Application Number
790670
790650
790651
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Well licence
Descriptors
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Okotoks field
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Well licence
Blowout control
Crossfield Fm
Drilling fluid
Environmental impact
ID-79-02
Locating
Safety
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision D80-4 on application No. 790670 to drill a well in LSD 11-30-20-28 W4M to evaluate and obtain production from all formations down to and including the Crossfield, application No. 790650 to construct an 88.9 MM pipeline to transport sour gas from well to existing gathering system and application No. 790651 to construct 60.3 MM - 133.4 MM pipelines to transport fuel gas from existing fuel gas system to well site; see related Decision D82-19
Interveners
Payne, L.
Rio Frio Ranch Ltd.
Location
11-30-020-28W4
Less detail

Decision 82-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2076
Applicant
Aquitaine Company of Canada Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Nova, an Alberta Corporation
Application Number
810629
810630
810631
810584
Title
Decision on application by Aquitaine Company of Canada Ltd., Gulf Canada Resources Inc., Nova, an Alberta Corporation, 1982 (permit to construct pipelines in the Stolberg - Ricinus areas)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Aquitaine Company of Canada Ltd., Gulf Canada Resources Inc., Nova, an Alberta Corporation, 1982 (permit to construct pipelines in the Stolberg - Ricinus areas)
Date
1982
Applicant
Aquitaine Company of Canada Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Nova, an Alberta Corporation
Application Number
810629
810630
810631
810584
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Ricinus field
Sour gas
Stolberg field
Capacity
Environmental impact
ID-79-02
Gas processing plant
NTS 83B
NTS 83C
NTS 83F
NTS 83G
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Route selection
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 82-2 on application No. 810629 and No. 810630 by Aquitaine (now Canterra energy) for two sections of pipeline to CARRY sour gas and a line to transport fuel gas and application No. 810631 by Gulf for a sour gas pipeline and application No. 810584 by Nova to add a loop to its existing system (all in TP.36-49, R.8-20, W5M); see Decision 82-15 for related gas plant applications.
Interveners
Consolidation Coal Company
Holt, D.
Mott, J.R.
Stelfox, H.
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Luscar Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 82-17

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2061
Applicant
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
811041
820204
820205
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (sour gas, fuel gas and saltwater disposal pipelines Shaw-Mountain Park areas)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (sour gas, fuel gas and saltwater disposal pipelines Shaw-Mountain Park areas)
Date
1982
Applicant
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
811041
820204
820205
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Mountain Park field
Pipeline construction permit
Shaw field
Sour gas
Waste water
Water pipeline
Coal lease
Coal preparation plant
Emergency procedure
Energy development
Environmental impact
Locating
NTS 83F
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 82-17 on application No. 811041, No. 820204 and No. 820205 to construct pipelines to transport sour gas from three wells in Shaw field and four wells in Mountain Park field to a central compressor station in LSD 2-28-48-21 W5M and from proposed compressor to Gulf's Robb plant, and to transport fuel gas from plant to compressor station & line heaters on sour gas gathering system, and to transport sour produced water from plant to water disposal well (TP.47-49, R.19-22, W5M).
Interveners
Mercoal Minerals Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 82-19

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2059
Applicant
Mitchell Energy Corporation
Application Number
820260
820261
Title
Decision on application by Mitchell Energy Corporation, 1982 (reinstatement of well licence and permit to construct pipelines in the Okotoks area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Mitchell Energy Corporation, 1982 (reinstatement of well licence and permit to construct pipelines in the Okotoks area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Mitchell Energy Corporation
Application Number
820260
820261
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Okotoks area
Okotoks field
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Well licence
Blowout preventer
Directional drilling
Drilling cost
Emergency procedure
Energy development
Environmental impact
Equity
ID-81-03
IL-81-07
Gas producing
Gas reserve
Gas well
Hydrogen sulphide
Land use
Land value
Lease drainage
Locating
NTS 82I
Pipeline route
Safety
Urban development
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S41
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 82-19 on application No. 820260 to reinstate well licence 92961 to drill well in LSD 11-30-20-28 W4M to obtain sour gas production from Crossfield member of Wabamun GP and No. 820261 for permits to construct pipelines to transport sour gas and fuel gas in the area; Board hearing 1982-04-27/28
Interveners
Payne, L.H.
deVries, D.
Rio Frio Ranch Ltd.
Sallenbach, O.
Less detail

Decision 82-E

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2314
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
810148
810149
810150
810663
810714
810715
810716
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1982 Shell proposed Moose and Whiskey Pipelines and related facilities, Kananaskis area
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Resources Limited, 1982 Shell proposed Moose and Whiskey Pipelines and related facilities, Kananaskis area
Date
1982
Applicant
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Application Number
810148
810149
810150
810663
810714
810715
810716
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Strom NA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Battery
Compressor station
Fuel gas pipeline
Gathering line
Gas pipeline
Kananaskis Area
Moose field
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Water disposal
Water pipeline
Whiskey field
Atmospheric diffusion
Conflict
Disposal well
Economic analysis
Energy development
Environmental impact
ID-81-03
IL-80-24
Gas producing
Hydrogen sulphide
Land reclamation
Land use
NTS 82J
NTS 82O
Pipeline crossing
Pipeline design
Pipeline leak
Pipeline route
Recreational facility
Safety
Sulphur recovery
Waste disposal
Waste water
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Pipeline Act
Notes
ERCB Reort 82-E on application no. 810148 for a pipeline to transport sweet fuel gas from Quirk Creek Plant to proposed Whiskey and Moose compressor stations; on application no. 810149 for pipeline to to transport sour gas from proposed compressor to Quirk Creek plant; on application no. 810150 for pipeline to transport sour gas from wellheads to proposed Moose and Whiskey compressor stations; on application no. 810663 for a pipeline to transport sour water from proposed compressor station to an injection well; on application no. 810714 to construct a gas battery with dehydration and liquid separation facilities and one compressor (LSD 4-35-21-5, W5M); on application no. 810715 to construct gas battery with dehydration and liquid separation facilities and two compressors (LSD 13-22-22-6, W5); and on application no. 810716 to dispose of sour water produced from Moose and Whiskey fields by injection into Mississippian Turner Valley Fm; Board hearing 1982-01-06/07/08/09/10/13/14/15 & 1982-02-01; See related ERCB Decisions 82-3, 82-12 and Report 82-D; See also ERCB Decision D83-22 on later Shell application (No. 830603) for Board to reconsider decision contained in this report
Less detail

Decision 83-11

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2346
Applicant
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Application Number
810924
810925
810926
820251
Title
Decision on application by Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, 1983 (sour gas pipelines, reinjection pipeline, fuel gas, gas pipeline, Brazeau River - West Pembina area)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, 1983 (sour gas pipelines, reinjection pipeline, fuel gas, gas pipeline, Brazeau River - West Pembina area)
Date
1983
Applicant
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Application Number
810924
810925
810926
820251
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Bray JA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Brazeau River field
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Pembina field
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Energy development
Gas cycling
Gas producing
NTS 83B
NTS 83C
NTS 83F
NTS 83G
Planning
Safety
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision D83-11 on application Nos. 810924 (north lateral line to transport sour gas from wells to plant), 810925 (west lateral line to transport sour gas from wells to plant), 810926 (reinjection line to transport sweet gas from plant to wells for reinjection) and 820251 (fuel gas line to transport fuel gas from plant to well sites, line heaters and other facilities) (TP.46-48, R.11-16, W5M); Board hearing 1983-06-21/22
Interveners
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Home Oil Company Limited
Pembina Resources Limited
Petro-Canada Inc.
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Pembina Area Sour Gas Exposures Committee
Less detail

Decision 83-17

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2316
Applicant
ICG Resources Ltd.
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Petrogas Processing Ltd.
Application Number
830165
830166
830167
830460
830461
830488
830489
Title
Decision on application by ICG Resources Ltd., 1983 (to drill well and construct pipelines in Crossfield Airdrie area); Decision on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., 1983 (special drilling spacing unit and licence to drill a well in Crossfield Airdrie area); Decision on application by Petrogas Processing Ltd., 1983 (to construct two pipelines in Crossfiled Airdrie area) 1983
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by ICG Resources Ltd., 1983 (to drill well and construct pipelines in Crossfield Airdrie area); Decision on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., 1983 (special drilling spacing unit and licence to drill a well in Crossfield Airdrie area); Decision on application by Petrogas Processing Ltd., 1983 (to construct two pipelines in Crossfiled Airdrie area) 1983
Date
1983
Applicant
ICG Resources Ltd.
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Petrogas Processing Ltd.
Application Number
830165
830166
830167
830460
830461
830488
830489
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Crossfield Airdrie area
Crossfield East field
Drilling spacing unit
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Gathering line
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Well licence
Blowout control
Blowout preventer
Design criteria
Emergency procedure
Equity
ID-81-03
ID-OG-76-02
Gas producing
Geologic interpretation
Hydrogen sulphide
NTS 82O
NTS 82P
Pipeline route
Route selection
Safety
Target area
Wabamun Gp
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.020
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.050
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision on application No. 830167 by ICG to drill a well on application No. 830165 by ICG to construct sweet fule gas pipeline to the well, on application No. 830166 by ICG to construct sour gas pipeline to tie well into existing Canoxy gas gathering system on application No. 830461 by Canoxy for a special drilling spacing unit and on application No. 830460 by Canoxy to drill a well, on application No. 830488 by Petrogas for sour gas pipeline proposed well to existing Canoxy gathering system and application No. 830489 by Petrogas to construct sweet fuel gas pipeline to the well sites (all in TP.27, R.28 W4 to R.1 W5)
Interveners
Austin Exploration Ltd.
Associated Engineering Services Ltd.
Fletcher, A.T.
Fletcher, H.
Less detail

Decision 83-25

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2296
Applicant
Petro-Canada
Application Number
830736
830737
Title
Decision on application by Petro-Canada, 1983 (sour gas pipeline, fuel gas pipeline, Benjamin field)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Petro-Canada, 1983 (sour gas pipeline, fuel gas pipeline, Benjamin field)
Date
1983
Applicant
Petro-Canada
Application Number
830736
830737
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Brushett ER
Webber HJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Benjamin field
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Gathering line
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Environmental impact
Decision D1983-8
Decision D1983-9
Guide 31
Interveners cost
Land reclamation
Land use
NTS 82O
Pipeline route
Right of way
Route selection
Soil conservation
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision D83-25 on application No. 830736 to construct 23.8 km of 88.9 and 168.3 MM outside diameter pipeline to transport sour gas from wells in LSD 11-33-28-7 W5M to gas plant in LSD 10-13-30-7 W5M and on application No. 830737 to construct 17.1 km of 60.3 MM outside diameter pipeline to transport fuel gas from existing Shell line in LSD 11-18-30-7 W5M to the well sites.
Interveners
Canterra Energy Ltd.
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Alberta Wilderness Association
Less detail

Decision 83-29

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision253
Applicant
Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Limited
Application Number
830688
830689
Title
Examiners report on application by Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Ltd., 1983 (sour gas pipeline, fuel gas pipeline CARSTAIRS area)
Date
1983
Title
Examiners report on application by Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Ltd., 1983 (sour gas pipeline, fuel gas pipeline CARSTAIRS area)
Date
1983
Applicant
Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Limited
Application Number
830688
830689
Hearing Panel
Fox EG
Pearson DG
Stafford GH
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Olds area
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Energy development
Environmental impact
ID-81-03
Gas producing
Land reclamation
NTS 83O
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Planning
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E83-29 on application No. 830688 for a permit to construct 3.02 km of 60.3- and 88.9 MM outside diameter pipeline to transport sour gas from the well Ammin Crosse 7-2-30-1 W5M to an existing Amerada sour gas line at 2-14-30-1 W5M and on application No. 830689 for a permit to construct 2.99 km of 60.3 MM outside diameter line to transport fuel gas from the existing pipeline to the well.
Interveners
Henderson, J.
Less detail

Decision 83-29

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2274
Applicant
Petro-Canada
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Application Number
830567
830883
830836
830873
831088
830874
831086
830875
831087
Title
Decision on application by Petro-Canada, 1983 (gas cycling schemes, sour gas pipelines, injection pipelines, fuel gas pipelines, Brazeau River-west Pembina area); Decision on application by Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, 1983 (gas cycling schemes, sour gas pipelines, injection pipelines, fuel gas pipelines, Brazeau River-west Pembina area)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Petro-Canada, 1983 (gas cycling schemes, sour gas pipelines, injection pipelines, fuel gas pipelines, Brazeau River-west Pembina area); Decision on application by Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, 1983 (gas cycling schemes, sour gas pipelines, injection pipelines, fuel gas pipelines, Brazeau River-west Pembina area)
Date
1983
Applicant
Petro-Canada
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Application Number
830567
830883
830836
830873
831088
830874
831086
830875
831087
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Bray JA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Brazeau River field
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas cycling
Gas injection
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Depletion
Energy development
Environmental impact
Gas condensate recovery
Monitoring
NTS 83G
Pipeline route
Planning
Reservoir characteristic
Reservoir pressure
Route selection
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision D83-29 on application numbers 830567, 830883, 830836, 830873, 831088, 830874, 831086, 830875, 831087 by Petro-Canada and Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas for gas cycling schemes, sour gas pipelines, injection pipelines and fuel gas pipelines in the Brazeau River-west Pembine area (TP.47-48, R.12-14, W5M).
Interveners
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Amoco Canada Petroleum Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 84-07

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1846
Applicant
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Application Number
831021
831022
Title
Decision on application by Canterra Energy Ltd., 1984 (sour gas pipeline, fuel gas pipeline, Calgary area)
Date
1984
Title
Decision on application by Canterra Energy Ltd., 1984 (sour gas pipeline, fuel gas pipeline, Calgary area)
Date
1984
Applicant
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Application Number
831021
831022
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Calgary area
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Conflict
Emergency procedure
ID-81-03
Hydrogen sulphide
Land value
NTS 82I
Pipeline accident
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Regional planning
Route selection
Safety
Urban development
Notes
Decision D84-7 on application No. 831021 to construct fuel gas pipeline from LSD 10-2-22-29 W4M to well sites at 10-13-22-29 W4M, 11-24-22-29 W4M, & 10-20-22-28 W4M and application No. 831022 for sour gas pipeline from well sites to existing pipeline at LSD 10-2-22-29 W4M; Board hearing 1984-02-15/16/17
Interveners
Lammle, B.
Lammle, M.
McKeag, L.
Moeller, A.
Ollerenshaw, F.J.
Pearson, D.
Pearson, R.
Shields, R.
Shields, V.
Soutzo, C.G.
Soutzo, A.G.
Uragi, K.
Workman, D.
Thompson, L.E.
Thompson, L.G.
Walker, D.
Paradis, G.
Paradis, L.
McKinstry, B.
Pawluk, J.
Pawluk, M.
McKeag, A.
City of Calgary
Committee for Toxic Pollutant Controls
Less detail

Decision 84-25

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1151
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
840662
840663
840664
Title
Examiners report on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1984 (permits to construct pipelines to transport sour and sweet gas, fuel gas, and multiphase fluids in the Garrington-Caroline area)
Date
1984
Title
Examiners report on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1984 (permits to construct pipelines to transport sour and sweet gas, fuel gas, and multiphase fluids in the Garrington-Caroline area)
Date
1984
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
840662
840663
840664
Hearing Panel
Dilay JD
Sharp KG
Houlihan RN
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Caroline area
Crossfield Garrington area
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Gathering line
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Dissolved gas
Environmental impact
Gas conservation
Land reclamation
NTS 83B
Pipeline crossing
Pipeline route
Route selection
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E84-25 on application No. 840662 to transport sweet and sour gas from five wells to north Caroline gas plant and and application No. 840664 to transport sweet fuel gas from battery to well and on application No. 840663 to transport oil and associated sweet gas from ten wells to battery.
Interveners
Bighorn Tribal Administration
Taylor, C.
Less detail

Decision 85-14

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1677
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
840607
840816
841010
841011
841012
841013
841014
841015
841016
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Gas cycling scheme, gas processing plant, sour gas production pipelines, fuel gas pipelines, sour gas injection pipeline, sweet gas)
Date
1985
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1985 (Gas cycling scheme, gas processing plant, sour gas production pipelines, fuel gas pipelines, sour gas injection pipeline, sweet gas)
Date
1985
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
840607
840816
841010
841011
841012
841013
841014
841015
841016
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Energy development
Ethane
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas cycling
Gas pipeline
Gas processing plant
Gathering line
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Valhalla field
Wembley field
Benefit cost analysis
Dissolved gas
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Flare
Gas cap
Gas condensate recovery
Gas conservation
Gas injection
Liquefied natural gas
NTS 83M
Petrochemical industry
Pressure maintenance
Recovery
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision D85-14 on application No. 840607 for gas cycling scheme and No. 840816 for gas processing plant and on no'S 841010 through 841016 for pipelines to gather sour gas from wells and batteries to proposed plant (TP.72-75, R.8-9 W6M); Board hearing 1985-01-15/16
Interveners
Total Petroleum Canada Ltd.
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Atcor Resources Limited
Chieftan Development Co.Ltd.
Dow Chemical Canada Inc.
Ocelot Industries Ltd.
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Petro-Canada Inc.
Sulpetro Limited
South Peace Regional Planning Commission
Bear Lake Farm Rights Group
Central Peace Farm Rights Group
Less detail

Decision 87-17

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision195
Applicant
Gulf Canada Corporation
Application Number
871017
871018
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Corporation, 1987 (permits to construct pipelines to transport sour gas and fuel gas in the Caroline area)
Date
1987
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Corporation, 1987 (permits to construct pipelines to transport sour gas and fuel gas in the Caroline area)
Date
1987
Applicant
Gulf Canada Corporation
Application Number
871017
871018
Hearing Panel
Strom NA
Antonio HA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Caroline area
Caroline field
Caroline gas project
Energy development
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Environmental impact
NTS 83B
Pipeline route
Route selection
Transportation corridor
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S2
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S4
Pipeline Act Part 4
Pipeline Act S4
Notes
Decision D87-17 on application No. 871017 to construct 15.9 km of 168.3 MM O.D. pipeline and related facilities to transport sour gas with a maximum H2S content of 450 moles per Kilomole from an existing well in LSD 3-36-35-5 W5M and on application No. 871018 to construct 13.5 km of 88.9 MM O.D. pipeline to transport fuel gas from an existing Gulf pipeline tie-in point in LSD 8-34-35-5 W5M to the well.
Interveners
Shell Canada Limited
Union Pacific Resources Inc.
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Dome Petroleum Limited
DeKalb Petroleum Corporation
Hall, W.
Location
03-36-035-05W5
08-34-035-05W5
Less detail

Decision 88-14

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision154
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
881522
881531
Title
Examiner report on application by Shell Canada Limited, 1988 (permits to construct pipelines to transport sour gas and fuel gas in the Sorge-Waterton area)
Date
1988
Title
Examiner report on application by Shell Canada Limited, 1988 (permits to construct pipelines to transport sour gas and fuel gas in the Sorge-Waterton area)
Date
1988
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
881522
881531
Hearing Panel
Nichol JR
Henderson DIR
Asgar-Deen ML
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Waterton field
NTS 82G
Route selection
Legal References
Pipeline Act Part 4
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E88-14 on application No. 881522 and No. 881531 for a permit to construct pipelines to transport sour gas in the vicinity of the Shell Waterton gas plant.
Interveners
Main, J.
Cyr, E.P.
Eggert, P.
Less detail

32 records – page 1 of 2.