34 records – page 1 of 2.

Decision 75-N

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2353
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Dupont of Canada Limited
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Canadian Industries Limited
Application Number
8491
8514
8549
8554
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., Dupont of Canada Limited, Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited and Canadian Industries Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., Dupont of Canada Limited, Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited and Canadian Industries Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1975
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Dupont of Canada Limited
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Canadian Industries Limited
Application Number
8491
8514
8549
8554
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Chloroethylene
Dichloroethane
Ethylene
Fort Saskatchewan area
Industrial development permit
Joffre area
Polymer
Red Deer area
Redwater area
Alberta
Chlorine - raw material
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Ethane - raw material
Ethylene - raw material
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 83A
NTS 83H
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 75-N on application No. 8491 (A.G.E.) to use ethane and gas as fuel and raw material to produce ethylene near Red Deer (A.G.E. unit 1) (permit No. age 76-1) and on application No. 8514 (Dupont) to use gas as fuel in production of high density polyethylene near Red Deer (application withdrawn) and on application No. 8549 (Dow) to use gas as fuel in vinyl chloride monomer plant near Fort Saskatchewan (permit no.DCC 76-1) and on application No. 8554 (CIL) to use gas as fuel in a low density polyethylene plant near Redwater (application withdrawn); Board hearing (age & Dupont); 1975-06-18/19/20 Board hearing (Dow & CIL) 1975-07-09.
Less detail

Decision 76-B

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2386
Applicant
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Application Number
9118
Title
Decision on application by Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited, 1976 (For industrial development permit under section 42 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited, 1976 (For industrial development permit under section 42 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act)
Date
1976
Applicant
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Application Number
9118
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Ethylene glycol
Ethylene oxide
Fort Saskatchewan area
Industrial development permit
Alberta
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 83H
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 76-B on application No. 9118 for an IDP to use gas as fuel to produce ethylene glycol and ethylene oxide in plant to be constructed at Fort Saskatchewan (permit DCC 76-2).
Less detail

Decision 76-G

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2381
Applicant
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Application Number
9222
Title
Decision on application by Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited, 1976 (power plant at Fort Saskatchewan)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited, 1976 (power plant at Fort Saskatchewan)
Date
1976
Applicant
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Application Number
9222
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Electric power
Descriptors
Electric power project
Fort Saskatchewan area
Chemical plant
Electric power demand
Electric power supply
Environmental impact
Industrial plant
NTS 83H
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S7
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Notes
ERCB Report 76-G on application 9222 to construct and operate a 140 mw power plant at its Fort Saskatchewan chemical processing complex (in TP.55, R.22, W4M) and to connect the power plant to Calgary Power's transmission system; See also Report 76-I for decision on use of gas as fuel to increase production of chlorine and sodium hydroxide
Less detail

Decision 76-I

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2379
Applicant
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Application Number
9493
Title
Decision on application by Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited, 1976 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited, 1976 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1976
Applicant
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Application Number
9493
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Hearing Type
Board
No Hearing
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Chlorine
Fort Saskatchewan area
Industrial development permit
Sodium hydroxide
Economic analysis
Fuel consumption
Gas consumption
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 83H
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 76-I on application No. 9493 for an industrial development permit authorizing the use of natural gas as fuel in the production of chlorine and caustic soda in an existing plant in the Dow complex at Fort Saskatchewan that would be expanded to increase capacity; no hearing; see also report 76-G for Decision on power plant for the complex.
Less detail

Decision 77-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2143
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
9608
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (permit to construct a pipeline from red deer to Fort Saskatchewan, part 1)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (permit to construct a pipeline from red deer to Fort Saskatchewan, part 1)
Date
1977
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
9608
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Butane
Ethane
Fort Saskatchewan area
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Pentanes plus
Propane
Red Deer area
NTS 83A
NTS 83H
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 77-5 on application No. 9608 to construct an oil line to transport ethane, propane, butanes and pentanes plus from the age plant under construction near Joffre and from Dome's Edmonton liquid gas plant to storage and eventual delivery to the Cochin pipeline at Fort Saskatchewan; Board hearing 1977-02-09 reconvened 1977-03-08; see also Decision 77-06
Interveners
The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Aristocrat Holdings Ltd.
The Battle River Regional Planning Commission
Dow Chemical of Canda Limited
Hampson, C.G.
Harmin Farms
Mayer, H.
Paley, M.
Heppner, E.
Heppner, L.W.
Heppner, M.M.
Heppner, E.A.
Heppner, M.M.R.
Chimer, W.
Cathton Holdings Ltd.
Fenske, W.A.
Lengert, H.
Lentz, C.
Madison Development Corporation Ltd.
Opaninski, B
Opalinski, T.
Yaskowich, J
Ziobro, S.
Shell Canada Resources Limited
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Kataleen, A.Y.
Less detail

Decision 77-06

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2142
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
9608
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (permit to construct a pipeline from Red Deer To Fort Saskatchewan, part 2)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited and Dome Petroleum Limited, 1977 (permit to construct a pipeline from Red Deer To Fort Saskatchewan, part 2)
Date
1977
Applicant
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
9608
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Butane
Ethane
Fort Saskatchewan area
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Pentanes plus
Propane
NTS 83H
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 77-6 on application No. 9608 to construct a pipeline to transport ethane, propane, butanes and pentanes PLU Board hearing 1977-02-09 reconvened 1977-03-08 see also Decision 77-5 for part 1
Interveners
The Alberta Gas Ethelene Company Ltd.
Aristocrat Holdings Ltd.
The Battle River Regional Planning Commission
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Hampson, C.G.
Harmin Farms
Mayer, H.
Paley, M.
Heppner, E.
Heppner, L.W.
Heppner, M.M.
Heppner, E.A.
Heppner, M.R.
Chimera, W.
Cathton Holdings Ltd.
Fenske, W.A.
Lengert, H.
Lentz, C.
Madison Development Corporation Ltd.
Opalinski, B.
Opalinski, J.
Yaskowich, J.
Ziobro, S.
Shell Canada Resources Limited
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Kataleen, A.Y.
Less detail

Decision 77-C

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2373
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited
Mitsubishi Corporation
Petalta Project (Petrochemicals Alberta Project)
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
Application Number
9070
8911
Title
Decision on application by Petalta Project (Alberta Energy Company Ltd, Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited, and Mitsubishi Corporation), 1977 (benzene plant) and Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line, Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited and Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1977 (benzene plant)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Petalta Project (Alberta Energy Company Ltd, Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company Limited, Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited, and Mitsubishi Corporation), 1977 (benzene plant) and Decision on application by Alberta Gas Trunk Line, Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited and Alberta Gas Chemicals Ltd., 1977 (benzene plant)
Date
1977
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Mitsubishi Petrochemical Company Limited
Mitsubishi Corporation
Petalta Project (Petrochemicals Alberta Project)
Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Alberta Gas Chemicals Limited
Application Number
9070
8911
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Berkowitz N
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Benzene
Bruderheim area
Chemical plant
Fort Saskatchewan area
Industrial development permit
Petalta Project (Petrochemicals Alberta Project)
Benefit cost analysis
Economic analysis
NTS 83H
Pentanes plus - fuel
Pentanes plus - raw material
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 77-C on application No. 9070 by AEC et al (Petalta) for a plant to be located near Fort Saskatchewan to convert pentanes plus to benzene and liquid byproducts and on application No. 8911 by AGTL et al for a plant to be constructed near Bruderheim to convert pentanes plus to benzene and liquid byproduct (including gasoline or diesel fuel); Board hearing (Petalta project APP # 9070) 1976-06-15/16 and 1976-07-05; Board hearing (AGTL Bruderheim APP # 8911) 1977-07-06/07/08/09
Less detail

Decision 78-07

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2113
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Application Number
770666
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., 1978 (construct a pipeline from Joffre to Fort Saskatchewan)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., 1978 (construct a pipeline from Joffre to Fort Saskatchewan)
Date
1978
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Application Number
770666
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Bohme VE
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Ethylene
Fort Saskatchewan area
Pipeline construction permit
Product pipeline
Red Deer area
Agricultural land
Buried
NTS 83A
NTS 83H
Pipeline construction
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Route selection
Legal References
Pipeline Act S7
Notes
Decision on application to construct a pipeline to transport ethylene from LSD 5-32-38-25 W4M to LSD 15-11-55-22 W4M and a meter station in LSD 15-11-55-22 W4M; Pipeline permit 14763 se related decision D79-2 for portion of the line in TP.52-53, R.22-23, W4M which was deferred in original decision
Interveners
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Group of Farmers Headed by W.A. Lovell
Holubisky, P.
Holubisky, S.
Canadian Industries Limited
Genstar Development Company Limited
Windsor, G.
Arnold Brothers Transport Ltd.
Qualico Developments
Less detail

Decision 78-23

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2097
Applicant
Petrochemicals Alberta Project
Application Number
780591
Title
Decision on application by Petrochemicals Alberta Project, 1978 (amendment of industrial development permit No. PAP 78-1)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Petrochemicals Alberta Project, 1978 (amendment of industrial development permit No. PAP 78-1)
Date
1978
Applicant
Petrochemicals Alberta Project
Application Number
780591
Hearing Panel
N/A
Hearing Type
N/A
No Hearing
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Benzene
Chemical plant
Fort Saskatchewan area
Industrial development permit
Benefit cost analysis
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 83G
Pentanes plus - raw material
Revision
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 78-23 on application No. 780591 to amend IDP No. PAP 78-1 to decrease use of pentanes plus as raw material and increase use of natural gas as raw material; no hearing; see also related ERCB reports 77-C and 77-H
Less detail

Decision 79-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2094
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Application Number
770666
780578
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., 1979 (permit to construct a pipeline from Joffre to Fort Saskatchewan)
Date
1979
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., 1979 (permit to construct a pipeline from Joffre to Fort Saskatchewan)
Date
1979
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Application Number
770666
780578
Hearing Panel
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Ethylene
Fort Saskatchewan area
Product pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
NTS 83H
Pipeline route
Route selection
Safety
Transportation corridor
Urban development
Notes
Decision 79-2 on application No. 770666 to construct a pipeline to transmit ethylene from Joffre to Fort Saskatchewan (earlier hearing 1978-03-15 resulted in Decision D78-7 and approval by permit No. 14763 of pipeline except that portion in TP.53, R.22-23, W4M) and on application No. 780578 to cancel permit No. 14763 as it relates to pipeline route through TP.52 and for approval of new route through this area which would locate the pipeline adjacent to the eastern boundary of the Sherwood Park west restricted development area (TP.52-53, R.22-23, W4M).
Interveners
Windsor, G.
Kahlke, E.
Reid, T.
Shaw, J.
Sutter, H.
Stannard, S.
Losty, J.
Genstar Development Company Ltd.
Mohawk Oil Company Limited
Less detail

Decision 81-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2005
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
ESSO Chemical Canada
Shell Canada Limited
Nova, an Alberta Corporation
Application Number
800530
800733
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Esso Chemical Canada and Shell Canada Limited and Nova, an Alberta Corporation, 1981 (styrene monomer production)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Energy Company Ltd. and Esso Chemical Canada and Shell Canada Limited and Nova, an Alberta Corporation, 1981 (styrene monomer production)
Date
1981
Applicant
Alberta Energy Company Limited
ESSO Chemical Canada
Shell Canada Limited
Nova, an Alberta Corporation
Application Number
800530
800733
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Bohme VE
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Bruderheim area
Chemical plant
Fort Saskatchewan area
Industrial development permit
Styrene
Benefit cost analysis
Benzene
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Ethylene - raw material
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 83H
Raw material
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 81-3 on application No. 800530 by AEC/ESSO to use gas, benzene and ethylene to produce styrene monomer in plant to be located adjacent Shell/Husky Strathcona refinery (TP.55-56, R.21, W4M); Board hearing 1980-11-25/26
Interveners
C-I-L Inc.
The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 81-33

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1734
Applicant
TransAlta Utilities Corporation
Application Number
810586
Title
Examiners report on application by TransAlta Utilities Corporation, 1981 (138 KV substation and transmission line Bruderheim area)
Date
1981
Title
Examiners report on application by TransAlta Utilities Corporation, 1981 (138 KV substation and transmission line Bruderheim area)
Date
1981
Applicant
TransAlta Utilities Corporation
Application Number
810586
Hearing Panel
Homeniuk TF
Dilay JD
Morin EJ
Hearing Type
Examiners
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Bruderheim area
Electric substation
Fort Saskatchewan area
Transmission line
Electric power demand
Environmental impact
Land use
Locating
NTS 83H
Oil refinery
Route selection
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S13
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S15
Notes
ERCB Examiners report no.E81-33 on application No. 810586 to construct and operate a 138 KV transmission line from a point on existing transmission line (CP 706L) to a proposed 138/25 KV substation to be located east of the Town of Bruderheim (TP.55-56, R.20-221, W4M).
Interveners
Prokopczak, L.
Roloff, R.
Roloff, M.
Laird, B.
Hennig, D.
Maschmeyer, D.
Lukawesky, O.
Paul, D.
Paul, M.
Paul, A.
Less detail

Decision 82-05

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2073
Applicant
Dow Chemical Canada Inc.
Application Number
810042
810043
Title
Decision on application by Dow Chemical Canada Inc., 1982 (Chlorine and caustic soda plant expansion and ethylene dichloride and vinyl chloride monomer plant expansion)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Dow Chemical Canada Inc., 1982 (Chlorine and caustic soda plant expansion and ethylene dichloride and vinyl chloride monomer plant expansion)
Date
1982
Applicant
Dow Chemical Canada Inc.
Application Number
810042
810043
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Chlorine
Chloroethylene
Dichloroethane
Ethylene
Fort Saskatchewan area
Industrial development permit
Sodium hydroxide
Capitalized cost
Cost analysis
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Expansion
Marketing
Monitoring
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 83H
Revision
Supply (economics)
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S30
Notes
Decision 82-5 on application No. 810042 to amend IDP No. DCC 80-7 for use of additional natural gas as fuel for production of chlorine and caustic soda and No. 810043 for use of ethylene and natural gas as raw material and fuel for production of ethylene facilities to be installed at Dow's existing plane at Fort Saskatchewan (located in sections 2 & 11-55-22 W4M.
Interveners
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Esso Chemical Canada
The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 82-22

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2056
Applicant
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Application Number
820083
Title
Decision on application by Northwestern Utilities Limited, 1982 (permit to construct a gas line northeast Edmonton area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Northwestern Utilities Limited, 1982 (permit to construct a gas line northeast Edmonton area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Application Number
820083
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Morin EJ
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Fort Saskatchewan area
Gas pipeline
High pressure
Meter station
Pipeline construction permit
Chemical plant
Environmental impact
Gas demand
NTS 83H
Pipeline route
Right of way
Route selection
Transmission corridor
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 82-22 on application No. 820083 to construct a gas line from LSD 1-4-55-20 W4M to LSD 3-21-53-23 W4M and a meter regulator station to bring high pressure gas from existing NUL facilities to the celanese methanol plant in Fort Saskatchewan area; Board hearing 1982-04-15/16
Interveners
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Celanese Canada Inc.
Johannes Prinz von Thurn und Taxis
R & M Schroter Enterprises Ltd.
Schroter, J.
Schroter, A.
Shell Canada Limited
Shirvell, C.S.
Simmons, H.
Less detail

Decision 82-34|82-14

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2045
Applicant
TransAlta Utilities Corporation
Application Number
820371
Title
Decision 82-34\Examiner report 82-14 on application by TransAlta Utilities Corporation, 1982 (240 KV transmission line Lamoureux to Deerland and Deerland substation Fort Saskatchewan area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision 82-34\Examiner report 82-14 on application by TransAlta Utilities Corporation, 1982 (240 KV transmission line Lamoureux to Deerland and Deerland substation Fort Saskatchewan area)
Date
1982
Applicant
TransAlta Utilities Corporation
Application Number
820371
Hearing Panel
Evans RG
Webber HJ
Homeniuk TF
Hearing Type
Examiners
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Electric substation
Fort Saskatchewan area
Transmission line
Electric power demand
Locating
NTS 83H
Oil refinery
Route selection
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S12
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S16
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S18
Notes
Decision 82-34 with Examiners report E82-14 appended on application No. 820371 to construct & operate 31 km of 240-KV double circuit steel tower transmission line from existing Lamoureux substation 71S to proposed 138-KV Deerland substation 13S (TP.55-56, R.20-22, W4M).
Decision report 82-34 released with Examiners Report 82-14
Interveners
Hoyda, D.
Lamoureux, C.
Lamoureux, A.
Chevron Canada Limited
Northcorp Development Inc.
Alberta Power Limited
Estate of P. Hauer
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Veltman, H.
Shell Canada Limited
Less detail

Decision 83-28

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2281
Applicant
Federated Pipe Lines Ltd.
Application Number
830394
Title
Decision on application by Federated Pipe Lines Ltd., 1983 (amend pipeline licences to allow the transport of high vapour pressure products and to construct high vapour pressure pipelines in the Fort Saskatchewan, Morinville, and Swan Hills areas)
Date
1983
Title
Decision on application by Federated Pipe Lines Ltd., 1983 (amend pipeline licences to allow the transport of high vapour pressure products and to construct high vapour pressure pipelines in the Fort Saskatchewan, Morinville, and Swan Hills areas)
Date
1983
Applicant
Federated Pipe Lines Ltd.
Application Number
830394
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fort Saskatchewan area
High pressure
Liquefied petroleum gas
Morinville area
Pipeline construction permit
Swan Hills area
Agricultural land
Enhanced recovery scheme
Environmental impact
Hydrostatic test
Miscible displacement
NTS 83H
NTS 83J
Pipe inspection
Pipe testing
Pipeline design
Pipeline pressure
Pipeline route
Revision
Route selection
Safety
Standard
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision D83-28 on application No. 830394 to amend pipeline licences No. 114, 904 & 4956 to convert 217 km of existing 323.9-, 273.1- & 168.3 MM diameter pipeline between Edmonton & Swan Hills from crude oil service to high vapour pressure service and to construct high vapour pressure pipelines in the Fort Saskatchewan, Morinville and Swan Hills area to transport NGL'S to Swan Hills & Judy Creek areas for use in miscible flood schemes for EOR (TP.53-67, R.22 W4M to R.10 W5M); Board hearing 1983-10-03/04
Interveners
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Dome Petroleum Limited
Esso Resources Canada Limited
Noranda Gas Industries
Town of Morinville
Qualico Developments Ltd.
Guaranty Properties Limited
Nikiforuk, N.
Alberta Hospital Edmonton
City of Edmonton
Less detail

Decision 84-22

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1701
Applicant
Federated Pipe Lines Ltd.
Peace Pipe Line Ltd.
Application Number
830394
840496
Title
Decision on application by Federated Pipe Lines Ltd., 1984 (to amend popeline licences and for permits to construct pipelines to transport high vapour pressure products in the Fort Saskatchewan, Morinvieel, Swan Hills area); Decision on application by Peace Pipe Line Ltd.., 1984 (to amend pipeline licences and for permit to construct pipelines to transport HVP products in the Fort Saskatchewan area)
Date
1984
Title
Decision on application by Federated Pipe Lines Ltd., 1984 (to amend popeline licences and for permits to construct pipelines to transport high vapour pressure products in the Fort Saskatchewan, Morinvieel, Swan Hills area); Decision on application by Peace Pipe Line Ltd.., 1984 (to amend pipeline licences and for permit to construct pipelines to transport HVP products in the Fort Saskatchewan area)
Date
1984
Applicant
Federated Pipe Lines Ltd.
Peace Pipe Line Ltd.
Application Number
830394
840496
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Warne GA
Antonio HA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fort Saskatchewan area
Liquefied petroleum gas
Morinville area
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Swan Hills area
Enhanced recovery scheme
High pressure
NTS 83G
NTS 83H
NTS 83J
Pipeline route
Legal References
Pipeline Act S7
Pipeline Act S13
Pipeline Act S23
Notes
Decision D84-22 on application No. 830394 by Federated and application No. 840496 by Peace Pipe.
Interveners
Chepil, N.
Less detail

Decision 92-03

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision23
Applicant
Federated Pipe Lines Ltd.
Application Number
920128
Title
Decision 92-03 : Federated Pipe Lines Ltd.: Application for a permit to construct a high vapour pressure products pipeline and metering facilities Acheson to Fort Saskatchewan
Date
1992
Title
Decision 92-03 : Federated Pipe Lines Ltd.: Application for a permit to construct a high vapour pressure products pipeline and metering facilities Acheson to Fort Saskatchewan
Date
1992
Applicant
Federated Pipe Lines Ltd.
Application Number
920128
Hearing Panel
Prince JP
Evans RG
Dilay JD
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fort Saskatchewan area
Liquefied petroleum gas
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Emergency procedure
NTS 83H
Safety
Notes
Decision D92-3 on application No. 920128 by Federated to construct about 64.4 km of HVP products pipeline from a meter station in LSD 5-2-53-26 W4 to a proposed metering station near Fort Saskatchewan.
Interveners
Joe's Auto Electric Ltd.
Tworek, P.A.
Young, P.A.
Morrison, T.
Location
05-02-053-26W4
Less detail

Decision 97-04

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2740
Applicant
Dow Chemical Canada Inc.
Application Number
960461
Title
Decision 97-04: Dow Chemical Canada Inc.: Application for an ethylene plant expansion, Fort Saskatchewan
Date
1997
Title
Decision 97-04: Dow Chemical Canada Inc.: Application for an ethylene plant expansion, Fort Saskatchewan
Date
1997
Applicant
Dow Chemical Canada Inc.
Application Number
960461
Hearing Panel
Mink FJ
McManus BT
Miller GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Ethane - raw material
Ethylene
Fort Saskatchewan area
Industrial development permit
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 83H
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S30
Notes
EUB Decision D97-4 on application no. 960461 to amend the plant's existing permit IDP 90-6 to change the start-up date of its preapproved expansion, an increase in the ethane feedstock, an increase in the quantity of gas used as fuel and a corresponding increase in ethylene production.
Interveners
Dzurny AM
Demeule NE
Emslie T
City of Fort Saskatchewan
Approval
Approved
Approved with conditions
Conditions
Lieutenant Governor in Council
Less detail

Decision 97-06

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2755
Applicant
Novagas Clearinghouse Ltd.
Application Number
1000947
1002782
Title
Decision 97-06: Novagas Clearinghouse Ltd. : Applications to construct and operate a fractionation facility and high and low vapour pressure pipelines Redwater to Fort Saskatchewan area
Date
1997
Title
Decision 97-06: Novagas Clearinghouse Ltd. : Applications to construct and operate a fractionation facility and high and low vapour pressure pipelines Redwater to Fort Saskatchewan area
Date
1997
Applicant
Novagas Clearinghouse Ltd.
Application Number
1000947
1002782
Hearing Panel
Dilay JD
Prince JP
MacDonald NW
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Butane
Gas pipeline
Ethane
Fort Saskatchewan area
Fractionation
Liquefied petroleum gas
NTS 83H
Pentanes plus
Pipeline construction permit
Propane
Storage facility
Notes
Decision on application to construct and operate a liquid fractionation facility in the Redwater area (Lsd 9 Sec 1 Twp 56 Rge 22 W4M) to reprocess ethane plus mix to recover ethane, propane, butane and pentanes plus; and on application no. 1002782 to construct and operate 5 pipelines to transport HVP/LVP products from the fractionator facility to existing pipelines and associated facilities in the Fort Saskatchewan area
Interveners
Gulf Canada Resources Limited
Chevron Canada Resources
Dow Canada Chemical Inc
Imperial Oil Limited
Kinetic Resources
Anez VM
Approval
Approved
Location
09-01-056-22W4
Less detail

34 records – page 1 of 2.