444 records – page 1 of 23.

Decision 74-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2186
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
7317
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Limited, 1974 (sulphur recovery and air pollution control at the Jumping Pound gas plant)
Date
1974
Title
Decision on application by Shell Canada Limited, 1974 (sulphur recovery and air pollution control at the Jumping Pound gas plant)
Date
1974
Applicant
Shell Canada Limited
Application Number
7317
Hearing Panel
Bray JA
Brushett ER
Webber HJ
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Jumping Pound field
Jumping Pound gas plant
Sour gas
Atmospheric diffusion
Emission
Environmental impact
IL-71-29
Pollution control
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
Decision 74-2 on application No. 7317 to amend approval No. 1393 to increase sulpher recovery efficiency, to decrease maximum daily S02 emissions, to increase maximum half-hour S02 emission, to increase incinerator stack height and to increase emergency flare stack height at the Jumping Pound gas plant (section 24-25-5-W5); approval No. 1393B
Less detail

Decision 74-07

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2183
Applicant
Alberta Power Limited
Application Number
7775
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Power Ltd., 1974 (Jasper power plant)
Date
1974
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Power Ltd., 1974 (Jasper power plant)
Date
1974
Applicant
Alberta Power Limited
Application Number
7775
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Strong JI
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Electric power
Descriptors
Jasper National Park area
Thermal power plant
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Reliability
Notes
Decision 74-7 on application No. 7775 to construct and operate a power plant within Jasper National Park; approval No. HE 7406 and Order No. Misc HE 7505
Less detail

Decision 74-10

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2180
Applicant
Imperial Oil Limited
Application Number
7887
Title
Decision on application by Imperial Oil Limited, 1974 (transmission of sour natural gas in 6-inch pipeline from the Jumping Pound west field to the Quirk Creek Gas Plant)
Date
1974
Title
Decision on application by Imperial Oil Limited, 1974 (transmission of sour natural gas in 6-inch pipeline from the Jumping Pound west field to the Quirk Creek Gas Plant)
Date
1974
Applicant
Imperial Oil Limited
Application Number
7887
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
Berkowitz N
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Gas pipeline
Jumping Pound west field
Sour gas
Environmental impact
Hydrogen sulphide
Safety
Notes
Decision 74-10 on application No. 7887 to construct about 33 mile long 6-inch pipeline for transmission of sour natural gas from well "IOE Jumpw 11-16-25-6 W5" to Quirk Creek gas plant; Board hearing 1974-08-08/09; application dismissed
Interveners
The Sarcee Indian Band
Sarcee Developments Ltd.
Copithorne, K.F.
The Department of Indian Affairs
City of Calgary
Less detail

Decision 75-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2176
Applicant
Sun Oil Company Limited
Application Number
7954
Title
Decision on application by Sun Oil Company Limited, 1975 (gas processing plant, Rosevear field)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Sun Oil Company Limited, 1975 (gas processing plant, Rosevear field)
Date
1975
Applicant
Sun Oil Company Limited
Application Number
7954
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Berkowitz N
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Edson area
Gas processing plant
Rosevear field
Sour gas
Conservation
Environmental impact
IL-71-29
Locating
Plant location
Recreational facility
Sulphur recovery
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S9.020
Notes
Decision 75-2 on application No. 7954 to construct a plant in section 33-54-15 W5M to process sour gas from Rosevear field; approval No. 2125; see also Decision 75-9 which discusses alternative sites for the plant
Interveners
Campbell, J.
Casey, J.
Johnston, B.
Kneteman, R.
Schultz, G.
Semeniuk, T.
Twiss, R.
Twiss, K.
Less detail

Decision 75-07

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2172
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
7869
7823
7913
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1975 (transmission and substation facilities stony plain - Devon project)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1975 (transmission and substation facilities stony plain - Devon project)
Date
1975
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
7869
7823
7913
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Strong JI
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Electric substation
Stony Plain area
Transmission line
Environmental impact
Locating
NTS 83H
Route selection
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S13
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S17
Notes
Decision 75-7 on application No. 7869, No. 7823 and to upgrade existing transmission and substation facilities in the area between Stony Plain and Devon, west of Edmonton.
Interveners
Goertz, R.
Halton-Grove REalty
Gray, D.S.K.
Estate of Elizabeth Bauer
Baron, H.
Weitzel, W.
Edmonton Regional Planning Council
Sigma Lands
Owners-Section 14-51-26-W4
Kapty, A.
Berretti, M
County of Parkland No. 31
McLean, W.
McLean, M.
QCTV
Devon Nurseries
Less detail

Decision 75-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2171
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
8238
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1975 (transmission line Crowsnest pass - Tent Mountain)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1975 (transmission line Crowsnest pass - Tent Mountain)
Date
1975
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
8238
Hearing Panel
Millard v
Berkowitz N
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Crowsnest Pass
Transmission line
Coal mine
Electric power demand
Environmental impact
NTS 82G
Route selection
Notes
Decision 75-8 on application No. 8238 to construct and operate a 25-KV transmission line in the Crowsnest Pass-Tent Mountain area to serve Colemen Collieries Tent Mountain mine.
Interveners
Great Divide Trail Task Force
Calgary Field Naturalists' Society
The Alpine Club of Canada
Alberta Wilderness Association
Alberta Fish and Game Association
Rocky Mountain Ramblers Association
Canadian Youth Hostels Association
Chinook Trail Association
Palliser Club
Sierra Club of Alberta
Skyline Trail Hikers of the Canadian Rockies
Coleman Collieries Ltd.
Oldman River Planning Commission
Less detail

Decision 75-09

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2170
Applicant
Sun Oil Company Limited
Application Number
7954
Title
Decision on application by Sun Oil Company Limited, 1975 (gas processing plant, Rosevear field)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Sun Oil Company Limited, 1975 (gas processing plant, Rosevear field)
Date
1975
Applicant
Sun Oil Company Limited
Application Number
7954
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Gas processing plant
Rosevear field
Sour gas
Environmental impact
Land use
Locating
Plant location
Sulphur recovery
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
Decision 75-9 on application No. 7954 for a plant in TP.54-55, R.15, W5M to process sour gas from the Rosevear field; see also Decision 75-2 approval No. 2125
Interveners
Johnston, B.
Campbell, J.
Twiss, R.
Twiss, K.
Less detail

Decision 75-10

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2169
Applicant
City of Edmonton
Edmonton Power
Application Number
8149
Title
Decision on application by City of Edmonton, 1975 (Lambton substation and 240 KV transmission line)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by City of Edmonton, 1975 (Lambton substation and 240 KV transmission line)
Date
1975
Applicant
City of Edmonton
Edmonton Power
Application Number
8149
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Electric substation
Transmission line
Electric power demand
Environmental impact
Locating
NTS 83H
Route selection
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S10
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Notes
Decision 75-10 on application No. 8149 to construct and operate a double-circuit 240-KV transmission line and substation to supply the southeast Edmonton area.
Interveners
Beckwith Farms (1966) Ltd.
Capital Management Ltd.
Ross, D.K.
Ross, Mrs. D.K.
Calgary Power
Less detail

Decision 75-13

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2166
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
8597
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited and Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1975 (For permit to construct an oil line for the transmission of propane butanes and pentanes plus from the Candel Minnehik-Buck Lake gas plant)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited and Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1975 (For permit to construct an oil line for the transmission of propane butanes and pentanes plus from the Candel Minnehik-Buck Lake gas plant)
Date
1975
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
8597
Hearing Panel
Craig DR
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Butane
Liquefied natural gas
Oil pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Pentanes plus
Propane
Environmental impact
Legal References
Pipeline Act Part 2
Notes
Decision 75-13 on application No. 8597 to construct an oil pipeline to transport propane, butanes and pentanes plus from the Candel Minnehik-Buck Lake gas plant to the existing Cochrane to Edmonton pipeline; Board hearing 1975-08-28; adjourned to 1975-09-09
Interveners
CanDel Oil Ltd.
Goliad Oil & Gas Company
Pembina Pipe Line Ltd.
M.L.A. for Drayton Valley
Less detail

Decision 75-C

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2365
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
7514
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1975 (construction and operation of an addition to the Sundance power plant)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1975 (construction and operation of an addition to the Sundance power plant)
Date
1975
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
7514
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Millard V
Strong JI
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Electric power
Descriptors
Electric power generation
Electric power plant
Power system interconnection
Sundance power plant
Thermal power plant
Alberta
Coal - fuel
Electric power demand
Environmental impact
Lake Wabamun
NTS 83G
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S7
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Notes
ERCB report 75-C on application No. 7514 for construction and operation of unit 5 of Sundance power plant; Board hearing (Govier/Millard/Strong) held 1974-03-12; Order No. HE 7410
Less detail

Decision 75-E

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2363
Applicant
Alberta Power Limited
Application Number
7556
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Power Ltd., 1975 (construction and operation of an addition to the Battle River power plant)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Power Ltd., 1975 (construction and operation of an addition to the Battle River power plant)
Date
1975
Applicant
Alberta Power Limited
Application Number
7556
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Strong JI
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Electric power
Descriptors
Battle River power plant
Electric power generation
Electric power plant
Power system interconnection
Thermal power plant
Alberta
Coal - fuel
Electric power demand
Environmental impact
NTS 83A
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S7
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Notes
ERCB report 75-E on application No. 7556 for an addition (unit 5) to the Battle River power plant; Board hearing (Govier/Strong/Desorcy) held 1974-05-01/02; Order no HE 7501
Less detail

Decision 75-F

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2362
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Alberta Ammonia Limited
Application Number
8009
7907
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1975 (ammonia plant near Brooks) and Decision on application by Alberta Ammonia Ltd., 1975 (ammonia plant near Raymond)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1975 (ammonia plant near Brooks) and Decision on application by Alberta Ammonia Ltd., 1975 (ammonia plant near Raymond)
Date
1975
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Alberta Ammonia Limited
Application Number
8009
7907
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Ammonia
Brooks area
Chemical plant
Fertilizer
Industrial development permit
Petrochemical industry
Raymond area
Alberta
Benefit cost analysis
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Fuel consumption
Gas consumption
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 72L
NTS 82H
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 75-F on application No. 8009 (Alberta ammonia) to use gas as raw material and fuel to produce anhydrous ammonia in plant near Raymond (request for Order-in-Council withdrawn) and on application No. 7907 (PanCanadian) to use gas as raw material and fuel to produce anhydrous ammonia in plant near Brooks (application withdrawn); Board hearing 1974-09-30, 1974-10-01/02/16; see also ERCB report 75-FA for supplementary information.
Less detail

Decision 75-FA

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2361
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Alberta Ammonia Limited
Application Number
8009
7907
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1975 (ammonia plant Decision on application by Alberta Ammonia Ltd. (ammonia plant near Raymond) (section 42 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by PanCanadian Petroleum Limited, 1975 (ammonia plant Decision on application by Alberta Ammonia Ltd. (ammonia plant near Raymond) (section 42 of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act)
Date
1975
Applicant
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Alberta Ammonia Limited
Application Number
8009
7907
Hearing Panel
N/A
Hearing Type
N/A
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Ammonia
Brooks area
Chemical plant
Fertilizer
Industrial development permit
Petrochemical industry
Raymond area
Alberta
Benefit cost analysis
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Fuel consumption
Gas consumption
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 72L
NTS 82H
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 75-FA supplementing ERCB report 75-F
Less detail

Decision 75-G

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2360
Applicant
Canadian Fertilizers Limited
Application Number
8162
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Fertilizers Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Section 42 for ammonia plant at Medicine Hat)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Fertilizers Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, Section 42 for ammonia plant at Medicine Hat)
Date
1975
Applicant
Canadian Fertilizers Limited
Application Number
8162
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Ammonia
Chemical plant
Fertilizer
Industrial development permit
Medicine Hat area
Petrochemical industry
Urea
Alberta
Benefit cost analysis
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
ERCB 75-F
ID-74-01
Fuel consumption
Gas consumption
Natural gas - fuel
Natural gas - raw material
NTS 72L
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 75-G on application No. 8162 to use gas as a raw material and fuel to produce ammonia in plant at Medicine Hat (section 14-13-6 W4); Board hearing 1974-12-16/17/18; permit No. CFL 75-1
Less detail

Decision 75-J

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2357
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
8239
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1975 (for construction and operation of a sixth unit at Sundance power plant)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1975 (for construction and operation of a sixth unit at Sundance power plant)
Date
1975
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
8239
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Electric power
Descriptors
Electric power generation
Electric power plant
Electric power project
Power system interconnection
Sundance power plant
Thermal power plant
Alberta
Coal - fuel
Electric power demand
Environmental impact
NTS 83G
Pollution control
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S7
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Notes
ERCB report 75-J on application No. 8239 for construction and operation of unit 6 at Sundance power plant in TP.52, R.4, W5.
Less detail

Decision 75-K

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2356
Applicant
Luscar Sterco Ltd.
Application Number
8494
Title
Decision on application by Luscar Sterco Ltd., 1975 (Coal Conservation Act parts 4 and 5)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Luscar Sterco Ltd., 1975 (Coal Conservation Act parts 4 and 5)
Date
1975
Applicant
Luscar Sterco Ltd.
Application Number
8494
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Craig DR
Berkowitz N
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Coal
Descriptors
Coal mine
Coal preparation plant
Coal project
Coal Valley Mine (Luscar)
Alberta
Coal reserve
Coalspur coal field
Economic analysis
Edson area
Engineering geology
Environmental impact
Hinton area
Land reclamation
Mining engineering
NTS 83F
Open pit mining
Pollution control
Reclamation
Slope stability
Socio-economic impact assessment
Structural geology
Surface mining
Thermal coal
Legal References
Coal Conservation Act S10
Coal Conservation Act S11
Coal Conservation Act S23
Notes
ERCB report 75-K on application No. 8494 to develop mine site, commence mining operations in 3 open pits mines and construct and operate coal processing plant, all in the vicinity of Coal Valley, TP.47, R.19-20, W5.
Less detail

Decision 75-N

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2353
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Dupont of Canada Limited
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Canadian Industries Limited
Application Number
8491
8514
8549
8554
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., Dupont of Canada Limited, Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited and Canadian Industries Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1975
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd., Dupont of Canada Limited, Dow Chemical Of Canada Limited and Canadian Industries Limited, 1975 (Oil and Gas Conservation Act, section 42)
Date
1975
Applicant
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Limited
Dupont of Canada Limited
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Canadian Industries Limited
Application Number
8491
8514
8549
8554
Hearing Panel
Govier GW
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Chloroethylene
Dichloroethane
Ethylene
Fort Saskatchewan area
Industrial development permit
Joffre area
Polymer
Red Deer area
Redwater area
Alberta
Chlorine - raw material
Economic analysis
Environmental impact
Ethane - raw material
Ethylene - raw material
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 83A
NTS 83H
Socio-economic effect
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
ERCB report 75-N on application No. 8491 (A.G.E.) to use ethane and gas as fuel and raw material to produce ethylene near Red Deer (A.G.E. unit 1) (permit No. age 76-1) and on application No. 8514 (Dupont) to use gas as fuel in production of high density polyethylene near Red Deer (application withdrawn) and on application No. 8549 (Dow) to use gas as fuel in vinyl chloride monomer plant near Fort Saskatchewan (permit no.DCC 76-1) and on application No. 8554 (CIL) to use gas as fuel in a low density polyethylene plant near Redwater (application withdrawn); Board hearing (age & Dupont); 1975-06-18/19/20 Board hearing (Dow & CIL) 1975-07-09.
Less detail

Decision 76-02

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2160
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Canadian Utilities Limited
Application Number
8856
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited and Canadian Utilities Limited, 1976 (Processing plant on the Northwestern Utilities Limited pipeline system)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited and Canadian Utilities Limited, 1976 (Processing plant on the Northwestern Utilities Limited pipeline system)
Date
1976
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Canadian Utilities Limited
Application Number
8856
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Craig DR
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Gas processing plant
Design criteria
Environmental impact
ID-73-01
Ethane
Expansion
Liquefied petroleum gas
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
Decision and addendum on application to expand the Edmonton liquid gas (straddle plant located on the NUL pipeline system within the southern boundary of the City of Edmonton (section 4-52-24 W4M)
Interveners
Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd.
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Alldritt Development Limited
Qualico Development Limited
Willowbrook Homes (1964) Ltd.
Canadian Industries Limited
Carma Developers Ltd.
City of Edmonton
Dow Chemical of Canada Limited
Gulf Oil Canada Limited
Imperial Oil Limited
PanCanadian Gas Products Limited
Texaco Exploration Canada Limited
The Alberta Ethylene Company Limited
Less detail

Decision 76-13

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2151
Applicant
Edmonton Power
Application Number
9188
Title
Decision on application by Edmonton Power, 1976 (transmission line of 240 KV and Jasper Substation)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Edmonton Power, 1976 (transmission line of 240 KV and Jasper Substation)
Date
1976
Applicant
Edmonton Power
Application Number
9188
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Electric substation
Transmission line
Electric power demand
Environmental impact
NTS 83H
Route selection
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S10
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Notes
Decision 76-13 on application No. 9188 to construct and operate a 240/72-KV substation and a 240 KV double circuit transmission line to serve the west Edmonton area.
Interveners
Calgary Power Ltd.
Famous Players Limited
Triple Five Corporation and Northern Trading Co. Ltd.
A Group of Eight Parties
Triple Five Corporation and a Group of Thirteen Parties
Less detail

Decision 76-F

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2382
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
8706
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1976 (240 KV transmission line facilities in Calgary area)
Date
1976
Title
Decision on application by Calgary Power Ltd., 1976 (240 KV transmission line facilities in Calgary area)
Date
1976
Applicant
Calgary Power Ltd.
Application Number
8706
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Craig DR
DeSorcy GJ
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Transmission line
Descriptors
Calgary area
Transmission line
Electric power demand
Environmental impact
Forecasting
NTS 82I
NTS 82P
Route selection
Legal References
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S9
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S11
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S13
Hydro and Electric Energy Act S14
Notes
ERCB report 76-F on application No. 8706 to construct and operate a 240-KV transmission line from a point NW of the City of Calgary to the Janet substation (CP 74S) just east of the City; Board hearing 1975-12-09/10
Less detail

444 records – page 1 of 23.