56 records – page 1 of 3.

Decision 77-27

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2121
Applicant
Aquitaine Company of Canada Limited
Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Limited
Application Number
770164
770340
770341
770342
Title
Decision on application by Aquitaine Company of Canada Ltd. and Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Ltd., 1977 (gas processing plant and pipelines in the Stolberg area)
Date
1977
Title
Decision on application by Aquitaine Company of Canada Ltd. and Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Ltd., 1977 (gas processing plant and pipelines in the Stolberg area)
Date
1977
Applicant
Aquitaine Company of Canada Limited
Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Limited
Application Number
770164
770340
770341
770342
Hearing Panel
Millard V
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Gas processing plant
Pipeline construction permit
Stolberg field
Sour gas
Conservation
Economic analysis
Energy development
Environmental impact
Gas reserve
NTS 83B
NTS 83C
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 77-27 on application No. 770164 by Amerada to construct a sour gas processing plant in LSD 2-8-41-13 (W5) and on application No. 770340 by Aquitaine to construct a pipeline to transport sour gas and on application No. 770341 by Aquitaine to construct a pipeline to transport condensate both from a point in LSD 2-3-41-14 W5 to a point in LSD 11-2-37-10 W4 and on application No. 770342 by Aquitaine to construct a pipeline to transport fuel gas from the Ram River plant (LSD 11-2-37-10 W5) to a dehydration plant in LSD 2-3-41-14 W5; Board hearing 1977-09-20/21
Interveners
Mobil Oil Canada Ltd.
Chevron Standard Limited
Bearcat Exploration Ltd.
Cree Lake Mining Ltd.
The Alberta Gas Trunk Line Company Limited
Gulf Oil Canada Limited
BP Exploration Canada Limited
Less detail

Decision 78-15

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2105
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
770422
Title
Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1978 (permit to construct a pipeline in the Crossfield area)
Date
1978
Title
Decision on application by Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd., 1978 (permit to construct a pipeline in the Crossfield area)
Date
1978
Applicant
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Limited
Application Number
770422
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Berkowitz N
Goodman CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Crossfield East field
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Relocation
Sour gas
Energy development
NTS 82P
Pipeline route
Planning
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 78-15 on application No. 770422 to construct a pipeline to transmit sour natural gas from a point in LSD 2-11-29-1 W5M to LSD 9-14-28-1 W5M to replace an existing pipeline; Board hearing 1977-08-03; adjourned to 1977-12-13; interim Decision issued; hearing reopened 1978-06-19
Interveners
Hooker, H.L.
Keeler, K.F.
The Farmers' Group
Howes, D.
Wittaker, D.
Howes, A.
Risler, W.
Aldred, B.
Rau, A.
Rau, L.
Rau, E.
Rau, J.
The Village of Crossfield
Rooke, J.D.
Maffei Farms Ltd.
O'Ferrell, B.K.
Cameron, W.G.
Thompson, R.W.
McLarty, A.L.
Less detail

Decision 80-08

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2031
Applicant
Grande Prairie Chamber of Commerce Agricultural Committee
Albright Surface Rights Group
Bear Lake Farmers Rights Group
Elmworth Surface Rights Group
Application Number
800050
Title
Decision D80-08: Application by Grande Prairie Chamber of Commerce Agricultural Committee et al for drilling spacing unit target area requirements for oil and gas wells drilled - Grande Prairie area
Date
1980
Title
Decision D80-08: Application by Grande Prairie Chamber of Commerce Agricultural Committee et al for drilling spacing unit target area requirements for oil and gas wells drilled - Grande Prairie area
Date
1980
Applicant
Grande Prairie Chamber of Commerce Agricultural Committee
Albright Surface Rights Group
Bear Lake Farmers Rights Group
Elmworth Surface Rights Group
Application Number
800050
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Strom NA
Warne GA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Spacing
Descriptors
Drilling spacing unit
Energy development
Grande Prairie area
Land use
Target area
Well spacing
Agricultural land
Environmental impact
IL-76-01
Gas producing
NTS 83L
NTS 83M
Oil producing
Procedure
Regulation
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
Decision 80-8 on application No. 800050 that the Board consider the drilling spacing unit target area requirements for future oil and gas wells to be drilled in the Grande Prairie area (TP.69-76, R.1-13, W6M); Board hearing 1980-04-21/22/23
Interveners
Lozeron, A.
Grande Prairie Agricultural Development Committee
Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
Canadian Petroleum Association
Esso Resources Canada Limited
Sulpetro Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Total Petroleum (N.A.) Limited
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Texaco Canada Resources Lte.
Brascan Resources Limited
Less detail

Decision 80-24

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2015
Applicant
Chinook Management Ltd.
Application Number
800590
Title
Decision on application by Chinook Management Ltd., 1980 (licence to drill a well Red Willow area)
Date
1980
Title
Decision on application by Chinook Management Ltd., 1980 (licence to drill a well Red Willow area)
Date
1980
Applicant
Chinook Management Ltd.
Application Number
800590
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Bohme VE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Red Willow field
Well licence
Coal mining
Conflict
Energy development
IL-80-14
Locating
NTS 83C
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Notes
Decision 80-24 on application No. 800590 to drill a well in LSD 14-12-40-16 W4M to evaluate and obtain production from all formations down to and including the Wabamun.
Interveners
Alberta Power Limited
Manalta Coal Limited
Forestburg Collieries Limited
Union Oil Company of Canada Limited
Calgary Power Ltd.
Location
14-12-040-16W4
Less detail

Decision 81-01

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2007
Applicant
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
800319
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1981 (gas processing plant Robb-Hanlan area)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1981 (gas processing plant Robb-Hanlan area)
Date
1981
Applicant
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
800319
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Kupchanko EE
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Alberta Coal Branch
Gas processing plant
Hanlan field
Hinton area
Lovett River field
Medicine Lodge field
Mountain Park field
Robb field
Shaw field
Sour gas
Coal mining
Conflict
Emission
Energy development
Environmental impact
IL-80-04
IL-80-24
Flare
Forestry
Locating
NTS 83F
Socio-economic effect
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S38
Notes
Decision 81-01 (and interim Decision dated 1980-11-21) on application No. 800319 to process sour gas in a plant to be located in the NE quarter of section 2 and SE quarter of section 10, TP.49, R.20 W5M; Board hearing 1980-11-12/13
Interveners
Denison Mines Limited
Luscar Ltd.
Manalta Coal Ltd.
Petro-Canada Exploration Inc..
St. Regis (Alberta) Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 81-13

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1995
Applicant
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Huber (J.M.) Corporation
Bearcat Explorations Ltd.
Application Number
800939
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., Huber (J.M.) Corporation & Bearcat Explorations Ltd., 1981 (common purchaser, carrier, and processor - Okotoks Crossfield pool)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., Huber (J.M.) Corporation & Bearcat Explorations Ltd., 1981 (common purchaser, carrier, and processor - Okotoks Crossfield pool)
Date
1981
Applicant
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Huber (J.M.) Corporation
Bearcat Explorations Ltd.
Application Number
800939
Hearing Panel
Webber HJ
Bellows LA
Bruni MJ
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Common purchaser
Common carrier
Descriptors
Common carrier
Common processor
Common purchaser
Okotoks field
Sour gas
Crossfield Fm
Energy development
IL-80-04
IL-81-07
Gas pipeline
Gas producing
Gas purchase
Lease drainage
NTS 82I
Urban development
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S49
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S52
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S54
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S56
Notes
Decision 81-13 (and Examiners report E81-14) on application No. 800939 for an Order declaring CWNG and Cominco to be common purchasers of gas from Okotoks Crossfield pool, Texasgulf to be a common carrier and common processor of gas from the pool.
Interveners
Texasgulf Inc.
Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
Mitchell Energy Corporation
Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Ltd.
BP Exploration Canada Limited
Less detail

Decision 81-14

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision238
Applicant
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Huber (J.M.) Corporation
Bearcat Explorations Ltd.
Application Number
800969
Title
Examiners report on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., Huber (J.M.) Corporation & Bearcat Explorations Ltd., 1981 (common purchaser, carrier, and processor - Okotoks Crossfield pool)
Date
1981
Title
Examiners report on application by Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd., Huber (J.M.) Corporation & Bearcat Explorations Ltd., 1981 (common purchaser, carrier, and processor - Okotoks Crossfield pool)
Date
1981
Applicant
Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.
Huber (J.M.) Corporation
Bearcat Explorations Ltd.
Application Number
800969
Hearing Panel
Webber HJ
Bellows LA
Bruni MJ
Hearing Type
Examiners
Category
Common processor
Descriptors
Common carrier
Common processor
Common purchaser
Okotoks field
Sour gas
Crossfield Fm
Energy development
IL-80-04
IL-81-07
Gas pipeline
Gas producing
Gas purchase
Lease drainage
NTS 82I
Urban development
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S49
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S52
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S54
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S56
Notes
ERCB Examiners report E81-14 on application No. 800939 for an Order declaring Gulf Canada a common processor of gas produced from Basal Quartz pool in the well Sundance et al Lennox 7-5-45-2 W5M (Hoadley pools); released with Decision 81-13;
Interveners
Texasgulf Inc.
Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
Mitchell Energy Corporation
Amerada Minerals Corporation of Canada Ltd.
BP Exploration Canada Limited
Less detail

Decision 81-20

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1988
Applicant
Unifarm
Smoky River Surface Rights Society
Bonanza and Districts Surface Rights Association
Application Number
810078
Title
Decision on proceeding on drilling spacing unit target area requirements for oil and gas wells drilled in the province of Alberta
Date
1981
Title
Decision on proceeding on drilling spacing unit target area requirements for oil and gas wells drilled in the province of Alberta
Date
1981
Applicant
Unifarm
Smoky River Surface Rights Society
Bonanza and Districts Surface Rights Association
Application Number
810078
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Spacing
Descriptors
Drilling spacing unit
Energy development
Target area
Well spacing
Agricultural land
Alberta
Gas producing
History
Land use
Locating
Oil producing
Planning
Regulation
Revision
Notes
Decision 81-20 on proceeding No. 810078 to consider change in current target area provisions for oil and gas wells in Alberta; Board hearing 1981-03-16/17/18/19/20 see related Decision 81-21
Interveners
Alberta Cattle commission
Alberta Surface Rights Federation
Blindman Valley Farmers Association
Bluffton Agriculture Association
Christian Farmers Federation
County of Beaver No. 9
County of Leduc No. 25, Agricultural Development Committee
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Farmers' Advocate of Alberta
Improvement District No.19, Surface Rights Group
Mountainview Landholders Group
Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87and Improvement District No. 18, Agricultural Development Committee
Municipal District of Sturgeon
O'Ferrall, B.K.
Parkland Acreage Owners Association
Three Hills Surface Rights Group
Warburg-Pembina Surface Rights Group
Willow Creek Agricultural Development Committee and Willow Creek Surface Rights Society
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Canadian Petroleum Association
Chevron Standard Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Esso Resources Canada Limited
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Independent Petroleum Association of Canada
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Western Mines Limited
Less detail

Decision 81-21

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1987
Applicant
Smoky River Surface Rights Society
Bonanza and Districts Surface Rights Association
Application Number
810078
Title
Decision on proceeding on drilling spacing unit target area requirements for oil and gas wells drilled in the Municipal District of Smoky River and Bonanza area
Date
1981
Title
Decision on proceeding on drilling spacing unit target area requirements for oil and gas wells drilled in the Municipal District of Smoky River and Bonanza area
Date
1981
Applicant
Smoky River Surface Rights Society
Bonanza and Districts Surface Rights Association
Application Number
810078
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Spacing
Descriptors
Bonanza field
Drilling spacing unit
Energy development
Smoky River area
Smoky River MD
Target area
Well spacing
Land use
NTS 83M
NTS 83N
NTS 84D
Notes
Decision 81-21 on proceeding No. 810078 to consider changes in target area in Bonanza area (TP.78-82, R.10-13, W6M) and Municipal District of Smoky River (TP.74-80, R.19-23, W5M); Board hearing 1981-03-16/17/18/19/20 see related Decision 81-20
Interveners
Alberta Cattle Commission
Alberta Surface Rights Federation
Blindman Valley Farmers Association
Bluffton Agriculture Association
Christian Farmers Federation
County of Beaver No. 9
County of Leduc No. 25, Agricultural Development Committee
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Farmers' Advocate of Alberta
Improvement District No. 19, Surface Rights Group
Mountainview Landholders Group
Municipal District of Bonnyville No. 87 and Improvement District No. 18, Agricultural Development Committee
Municipal District of Sturgeon
O'Ferrall, B.K.
Parkland Acreage Owners Association
Three Hills Surface Rights Group
Unifarm
Warburg-Pembina Surface Rights Group
Willow Creek Agricultural Development Committee
Willow Creek Surface Rights Society
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Canadian Petroleum Association
Chevron Standard Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
Esso Resource Canada Limited
Hudson's Bay Oil and Gas Company Limited
Independant Petroleum Association of Canada
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Shell Canada Resources Limited
Western Mines Limited
Less detail

Decision 81-24

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1984
Applicant
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Application Number
800889
Title
Decision on application by Union Carbide Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene glycol)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Union Carbide Canada Limited, 1981 (industrial development permit to manufacture ethylene glycol)
Date
1981
Applicant
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Application Number
800889
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
McAndrews CJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Industrial development permit
Descriptors
Chemical plant
Ethylene glycol
Industrial development permit
Prentiss area
Agricultural land
Conflict
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Energy development
Environmental impact
Ethylene - raw material
Land use
Locating
Marketing
Natural gas - fuel
NTS 83A
Plant location
Socio-economic effect
Supply (economics)
Water supply
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S42
Notes
Decision 81-24 on application No. 800889 to use ethylene as feedstock and gas as fuel to produce ethylene glycol in a new plant to be constructed near Prentiss (section 30-39-25 W4M); Board hearing 1981-04-14/15/16/20/21
Interveners
Preserve Agricultural Land
Craigievar Farms
Unifarm
Christian Farmers Federation
Red Deer Board of the Alberta Institute of Agrologists
Superior Sod Farms
F.E.M. Farms Ltd.
Carlyle, R.J.
Friesen, G.
Hainsworth, J.W.
Russell, M.
Russell, E.
Low, D.C.
Chessor, D.
Sather, A.P.
Red Deer River Regional Planning Commission
Buffalo Lake Regional Resources Project
Alix Chamber of Commerce
Village of Mirror
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Esso Chemical Canada
Du Pont Canada Inc.
Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
NOVA, AN ALBERTA CORPORATION
Shell Canada Limited
Less detail

Decision 81-26

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1982
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
801010
810132
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1981 (Reduced spacing and target area requirements - Lindbergh area)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Dome Petroleum Limited, 1981 (Reduced spacing and target area requirements - Lindbergh area)
Date
1981
Applicant
Dome Petroleum Limited
Application Number
801010
810132
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Spacing
Descriptors
Drilling spacing unit
Energy development
Lindbergh area
Target area
Well spacing
Environmental impact
Land use
Locating
NTS 73E
Oil producing
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S4.030
Notes
Decision 81-26 (with interim Decision dated 1981-07-06) on application No. 801010 and proceeding No. 810132 for changes in target areas in Lindbergh area (TP.53-56, R.3-6, W4M); Board hearing 1981-06-16/17/18
Interveners
Elk Point Surface Rights Association
Highway 14 East Surface Rights Group
North East Alberta Protective Rights Association
North East Alberta Branch of the Alberta Institute of Agrologists
Christian Farmers Federation of Western Canada
PanCanadian Petroleum Limited
Westim Resources Ltd.
Cold Lake and District Fish and Game Association
Less detail

Decision 81-27

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1981
Applicant
Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
Application Number
810487
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited, 1981 (secondary natural gas lines and regulator facilities Calgary – Priddis areas)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited, 1981 (secondary natural gas lines and regulator facilities Calgary – Priddis areas)
Date
1981
Applicant
Canadian Western Natural Gas Company Limited
Application Number
810487
Hearing Panel
Bohme VE
Goodman CJ
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Utilities
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Calgary area
Gas pipeline
Pipeline construction permit
Energy development
Gas demand
Land value
NTS 82J
Pipeline route
Regional planning
Route selection
Transmission corridor
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 81-27 on application No. 810487 to construct about 25 km of 406.4 MM pipeline and associated REGULATING facilities to transport natural gas from an existing Nova pipeline near Priddis to proposed regulator station in south Calgary (TP.22, R.1-3, W5M); Board hearing 1981-09-08/09/10 see related Decision 80-21
Interveners
City of Calgary
Red Deer Lake Community Association
Priddis Community Association
Hope-Ross, W.
Drager, J.C.
Van Weilingen, G.A.
Arnold Investments Ltd.
Babichuk, O.
Big Springs Ranch Ltd.
Brooks, D.
Kluzak, G.
Krassman, M.
Sweeney, E.
Waddell, W.A.
Southern, Mr. & Mrs.
R.Z. Holdings Ltd.
Hartel Holdings Co. Ltd.
Ulster Developments Ltd.
Paperny, M.
Trafalga Investments Ltd.
Very, R.A.
Allen, G.
Payne, B.A.
Less detail

Decision 81-29

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1979
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
810385
Title
Decision report 81-29: Inquiry report northeast Edmonton pipeline corridor inquiry
Date
1981
Title
Decision report 81-29: Inquiry report northeast Edmonton pipeline corridor inquiry
Date
1981
Applicant
Energy Resources Conservation Board
Application Number
810385
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Land use
Inquiry - Pipelines
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Energy development
Pipeline
Regional planning
Transmission corridor
Transportation corridor
Urban development
Environmental impact
Land use
NTS 83H
Pipeline route
Planning
Route selection
Safety
Notes
Decision 81-29 on proceeding No. 810385 to inquire into and report on the most desirable route for a pipeline corridor in NE Edmonton (from Sherwood Park west) and Edmonton restricted development areas north of CNR Marshalling Yards to a point near HWY 21 and width of corridor (all in TP.53-54, R.22-23, W4M); Board inquiry 1981-09-15/16 see related Decisions 81-7 and 81-19
Interveners
Alberta Energy Company Limited
The Alberta Gas Ethylene Company Ltd.
Canada Cement Lafarge Limited
Canadian Petroleum Association
City of Edmonton
County of Strathcona No. 20
Daon Development Corporation
Dome Petroleum Limited
Edmonton Regional Planning Commission
Genstar Development Company
Imperial Oil Limited
Esso Resources Canada Ltd.
Jackson, D.F.
Jackson, H.
Jackson, R.
Johannes Prinz Von Thurn und Taxis
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Ram Holdings Co. Ltd.
Shell Canada Limited
Stewart, Weir, Stewart, Watson, Heinrichs & Dixon
Thickwood Holdings Alberta Ltd.
Turbo Resources Limited
Van Hecke, A.
Van Hecke, C.
Less detail

Decision 81-31

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1977
Applicant
Alberta Products Pipe Line Limited
Application Number
810759
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Products Pipe Line Ltd., 1981 (permit to construct segments of a pipeline near Calgary and Leduc)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Products Pipe Line Ltd., 1981 (permit to construct segments of a pipeline near Calgary and Leduc)
Date
1981
Applicant
Alberta Products Pipe Line Limited
Application Number
810759
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Calgary area
Leduc area
Pipeline construction permit
Product pipeline
Energy development
NTS 82P
NTS 83H
Pipeline route
Route selection
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 81-31 on application No. 810759 for consideration of segments of pipeline approved (permit No. 189419) in TP.24-25, R. 28-29, W4M and TP.49-50, R.24-25, W4M see related ERCB Decisions 80-30 and 81-34
Interveners
Cathton Holdings Ltd.
Town of Leduc
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision 81-34

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision1974
Applicant
Alberta Products Pipe Line Limited
Application Number
810460
810461
810462
810513
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Products Pipe Line Ltd., 1981 (permit to construct deferred portions of a pipeline - Edmonton to Calgary)
Date
1981
Title
Decision on application by Alberta Products Pipe Line Ltd., 1981 (permit to construct deferred portions of a pipeline - Edmonton to Calgary)
Date
1981
Applicant
Alberta Products Pipe Line Limited
Application Number
810460
810461
810462
810513
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Strom NA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Edmonton area
Pipeline construction permit
Product pipeline
Red Deer area
Coal deposit
Energy development
Land use
NTS 83A
NTS 83H
Pipeline route
Right of way
Route selection
Transportation corridor
Legal References
Pipeline Act S34
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 81-34 on application No. 810460, 810461, 810462 and 810513 for segments of pipeline approved under permit 189419 (TP.44-46, R.26 W4M TP.47-48, R.25-26, W4M and TP.50-53, R.23-25, W4M) Board hearing 1981-10-21/22/23 see related ERCB Decisions 80-30 and 81-31
Interveners
City of Edmonton
County of Lacombe No. 14
Daon Development Corporation
Landowners - Alternative Route
Schotte, A.
Town of Lacombe
Approval
Approved
Less detail

Decision 82-11

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2067
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
810417
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1982 (proposed deep-cut facilities Judy Creek area gas processing plants)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Esso Resources Canada Limited, 1982 (proposed deep-cut facilities Judy Creek area gas processing plants)
Date
1982
Applicant
ESSO Resources Canada Limited
Application Number
810417
Hearing Panel
Berkowitz N
DeSorcy GJ
Mink FJ
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Ethane
Gas processing plant
Judy Creek field
Sour gas
Benefit cost analysis
Capitalized cost
Demand (economics)
Economic analysis
Energy development
Expansion
Gas conservation
Liquefied natural gas
Marketing
NTS 83J
Petrochemical industry
Raw material
Supply (economics)
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision on application to modify existing Judy Creek gas conservation plant located in LSD 15-25-64-11 W5M to extract a mixture of ethane and heavier hydrocarbons (ethane plus from the processed gas)
Interveners
Alberta and Southern Gas Co. Ltd.
Alberta Natural Gas Company Ltd.
Amoco Canada Petroleum Company Ltd.
Canadian Hunter Exploration Ltd.
Chevron Standard Limited
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Northwestern Utilities Limited
Shell Canada Chemical Company
Texaco Canada Resources Ltd.
Union Carbide Canada Limited
Alberta Energy Company Ltd.
Esso Chemical Company
Hudbay Chemical Company
Alberta Ethane/Ethylene Petrochemical Project
C-I-L-Inc.
Trimac Limited
Dome Petroleum Limited
CU Ethane Limited
Less detail

Decision 82-15|82-15 Addendum

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2063
Applicant
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
810650
810849
Title
Decision on application by Canterra Energy Ltd. and Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (Ram River gas processing plant and Strachan gas processing plant) (and addendum)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Canterra Energy Ltd. and Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (Ram River gas processing plant and Strachan gas processing plant) (and addendum)
Date
1982
Applicant
Canterra Energy Ltd.
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
810650
810849
Hearing Panel
Millard V
Strom NA
Evans RG
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Gas processing
Descriptors
Blackstone field
Brazeau River field
Chedderville field
Gas processing plant
Hanlan field
Ricinus field
Sour gas
Stolberg field
Strachan field
Capacity
Citizen participation
Design criteria
Desulphurization
Emission
Energy development
Environmental impact
IL-80-24
Expansion
NTS 82O
NTS 83B
NTS 83C
Revision
Sulfreen process
Sulphur dioxide
Sulphur recovery
Legal References
Oil and Gas Conservation Act S26
Notes
Decision 82-15 and addendum on application No. 810650 by Canterra (formerly Aquitaine) to amend approval No. 2820 to include additional fields and increase sulphur recovery for its Ram River gas plant located in section 2-37-10 W5M and on application No. 810849 by Gulf to amend approval No. 3351 to include additional fields and increase sulphur recovery for its Strachan gas plant located in section 35-37-9 W5M; Board hearing 1982-04-26/27 & 1982-05-03/04/05/06; see Decision D82-2 for related pipeline applications
Interveners
Rocky Veterinary Clinic Ltd.
Federation of Alberta Naturalists
The Alberta Fish and Game Association
Public Advisory Committee to the Environment Council of Alberta
Red Deer Fish and Game Association
Less detail

Decision 82-17

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2061
Applicant
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
811041
820204
820205
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (sour gas, fuel gas and saltwater disposal pipelines Shaw-Mountain Park areas)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Gulf Canada Resources Inc., 1982 (sour gas, fuel gas and saltwater disposal pipelines Shaw-Mountain Park areas)
Date
1982
Applicant
Gulf Canada Resources Inc.
Application Number
811041
820204
820205
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Bohme VE
Strom NA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Mountain Park field
Pipeline construction permit
Shaw field
Sour gas
Waste water
Water pipeline
Coal lease
Coal preparation plant
Emergency procedure
Energy development
Environmental impact
Locating
NTS 83F
Pipeline design
Pipeline route
Route selection
Safety
Legal References
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 82-17 on application No. 811041, No. 820204 and No. 820205 to construct pipelines to transport sour gas from three wells in Shaw field and four wells in Mountain Park field to a central compressor station in LSD 2-28-48-21 W5M and from proposed compressor to Gulf's Robb plant, and to transport fuel gas from plant to compressor station & line heaters on sour gas gathering system, and to transport sour produced water from plant to water disposal well (TP.47-49, R.19-22, W5M).
Interveners
Mercoal Minerals Ltd.
Less detail

Decision 82-19

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2059
Applicant
Mitchell Energy Corporation
Application Number
820260
820261
Title
Decision on application by Mitchell Energy Corporation, 1982 (reinstatement of well licence and permit to construct pipelines in the Okotoks area)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Mitchell Energy Corporation, 1982 (reinstatement of well licence and permit to construct pipelines in the Okotoks area)
Date
1982
Applicant
Mitchell Energy Corporation
Application Number
820260
820261
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Bellows LA
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Pipelines
Descriptors
Fuel gas pipeline
Gas pipeline
Okotoks area
Okotoks field
Pipeline construction permit
Sour gas
Well licence
Blowout preventer
Directional drilling
Drilling cost
Emergency procedure
Energy development
Environmental impact
Equity
ID-81-03
IL-81-07
Gas producing
Gas reserve
Gas well
Hydrogen sulphide
Land use
Land value
Lease drainage
Locating
NTS 82I
Pipeline route
Safety
Urban development
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S41
Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
Pipeline Act
Notes
Decision 82-19 on application No. 820260 to reinstate well licence 92961 to drill well in LSD 11-30-20-28 W4M to obtain sour gas production from Crossfield member of Wabamun GP and No. 820261 for permits to construct pipelines to transport sour gas and fuel gas in the area; Board hearing 1982-04-27/28
Interveners
Payne, L.H.
deVries, D.
Rio Frio Ranch Ltd.
Sallenbach, O.
Less detail

Decision 82-40

https://had.aer.ca/link/decision2039
Applicant
Suncor Inc.
Application Number
821059
821060
Title
Decision on application by Suncor Inc., 1982 (to reinstate well licence numbers 97997 and 97998)
Date
1982
Title
Decision on application by Suncor Inc., 1982 (to reinstate well licence numbers 97997 and 97998)
Date
1982
Applicant
Suncor Inc.
Application Number
821059
821060
Hearing Panel
DeSorcy GJ
Goodman CJ
Brushett ER
Hearing Type
Board
Category
Well licence
Descriptors
Acheson East field
Edmonton area
Well licence
Directional drilling
Energy development
ID-81-04
Land use
Regional planning
Urban development
Legal References
Energy Resources Conservation Act S43
Notes
Decision 82-40 on application No. 821059 and 821060 to reinstate well licence 97997 for the well Suncor Acheson east 12-30-52-25 and well licence 97998 for the well Suncor Acheson east 4-31-52-25 both issued to directionally drill two wells from surface location in LSD 14-30-52-25 W4M to obtain production from Basal Quartz Sandstone; pre-inquiry meeting 1982-12-21
Interveners
Belvedere Developments Ltd.
Zukiwski Holdings Ltd.
Corvan Investments Ltd.
Integrated Building Corp. Ltd.
R.E.L. Peers
The City of Edmonton
Location
12-30-052-25W4
04-31-052-25W4
14-30-052-25W4
Less detail

56 records – page 1 of 3.