Narrow Results By
Applicant
- AltaGas Limited 1
- Anadarko Canada Corporation 1
- Anderson Resources Limited 1
- BA Energy Inc. 1
- Bashaw Oil Corporation 1
- Bearspaw Petroleum Limited 1
- Burlington Resources Canada Ltd. 3
- Compton Petroleum Corporation 2
- Daylight Energy Limited 1
- Dominion Exploration Canada Ltd. 1
- Duvernay Oil Corp. 1
- EOG Resources Canada Inc. 1
Decision 2000-04
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3203
- Applicant
- Anderson Resources Limited
- Application Number
- 1042760
- 1048692
- Title
- Examiner report on application by Anderson Resources Ltd. applications for a well licence ARL Gordondale 14-30-79-10, Gordondale area
- Date
- 2000
- Title
- Examiner report on application by Anderson Resources Ltd. applications for a well licence ARL Gordondale 14-30-79-10, Gordondale area
- Date
- 2000
- Applicant
- Anderson Resources Limited
- Application Number
- 1042760
- 1048692
- Hearing Panel
- Langlo CA
- Willard RJ
- Abel TG
- Hearing Type
- Examiners
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Emergency response plan
- Exploratory well
- Wabamun Fm
- Kiskatinaw Fm
- Gordondale field
- NTS 83M
- Well licence
- Legal References
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S29
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Notes
- Examiner report E2000-04 on application no. 1042760 for a licence to drill a level-2 noncritical sour gas well from surface location Lsd 31 Sec 79 Twp 10 W6M to produce gas from the Wabamun and Kiskatinaw formaitons, resulting in well licence no. 0224954 and objected to under ERCA S29; in response Anderson proposed alternate surface location at Lsd 5 Sec 30 Twp 79 Rge 10 W6M as application no. 1048692
- Interveners
- Lee W
- Approval
- Approved
- Location
- 05-30-079-10W6
Decision 2001-98
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3486
- Applicant
- Burlington Resources Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 1247815
- Title
- Decision 2001-98: Burlington Resources Canada Energy Ltd. production operations emergency response plan Gregg Lake, Hinton area
- Date
- 2001
- Title
- Decision 2001-98: Burlington Resources Canada Energy Ltd. production operations emergency response plan Gregg Lake, Hinton area
- Date
- 2001
- Applicant
- Burlington Resources Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 1247815
- Hearing Panel
- Berndtsson NG
- McGee TM
- Willard RJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Descriptors
- Emergency Response Plan
- Gas pipeline
- Gas processing
- Hinton area
- Horizontal drilling
- NTS 83F
- Pipeline construction
- Sour gas
- Interveners
- Ramsey L
- Tymstra C
- Approval
- Approved
Decision 2004-90
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3893
- Applicant
- EOG Resources Canada Inc.
- Application Number
- 1327299
- Title
- Decision 2004-090 EOG Resources Canada Inc. application for a licence for a natural gas well Jumping Pound West
- Date
- 2004
- Title
- Decision 2004-090 EOG Resources Canada Inc. application for a licence for a natural gas well Jumping Pound West
- Date
- 2004
- Applicant
- EOG Resources Canada Inc.
- Application Number
- 1327299
- Hearing Panel
- Nichol JR
- McGee TM
- Waisman DD
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Air quality
- Emergency Response Plan
- Emission
- Gas well
- Health
- Hydrogen sulphide
- Jumping Pound west field
- Natural gas
- NTS 82O
- Property
- Public consultation
- Safety
- Site survey
- Sour gas
- Value
- Well licence
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.20
- Interveners
- O'Nions D
- Deer D
- Deere K
- Cook P
- M.D. of Rockyview
- West T
- Pedenko V
- Kovats J
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- Should EOG drill this well in the winter months, EOG must have a contractor on standby to plough the roads, if necessary, to ensure that the roads are passable in the event that an evacuation is necessary while conducting operations in the sour zone.
- EOG must supply copies of the updated ERP to any resident within the EPZ who requests it.
- EOG is directed to ensure that its test of communications and response protocols conforms to a tabletop exercise, including communications, as described in Appendix 3 of Guide 71.
- Location
- 07-02-024-05W5
- 10-35-023-05W5
Decision 2005-35
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision3951
- Applicant
- Talisman Energy Inc.
- Application Number
- 1356869
- Title
- Decision 2005-35: Talisman Energy Inc. application for a well licence Turner Valley
- Date
- 2005
- Title
- Decision 2005-35: Talisman Energy Inc. application for a well licence Turner Valley
- Date
- 2005
- Applicant
- Talisman Energy Inc.
- Application Number
- 1356869
- Hearing Panel
- Nichol JR
- McGee TM
- Remmer WG
- Hearing Type
- Board
- No Hearing
- Category
- Well licence
- Legal References
- EUB Rules of Practice S20
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Interveners
- Schmaus H Schmaus T
- Approval
- Withdrawn
- Location
- 02-17-019-02W5
Decision 2005-58
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4004
- Applicant
- Intrepid Energy Corporation
- Application Number
- 1366746
- Title
- Decision 2005-058: Intrepid Energy Corporation application for a well licence, Sturgeon Lake South Field
- Date
- 2005
- Title
- Decision 2005-058: Intrepid Energy Corporation application for a well licence, Sturgeon Lake South Field
- Date
- 2005
- Applicant
- Intrepid Energy Corporation
- Application Number
- 1366746
- Hearing Panel
- Nichol JR
- Boyler DK
- Willard RJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Directional well
- Emergency Response Plan
- Hydrogen sulphide
- Leduc Fm
- NTS 83K
- NTS 83N
- Sturgeon Lake south field
- Well licence
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Interveners
- Sturgeon Lake Cabin Owners Group
- Bustin K
- Rigler K
- Lessoway R
- Marcie G
- Boutilier P
- Municipal District of Greenview No.19
- Tymchyshyn
- Approval
- Approved
Decision 2005-60
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4006
- Applicant
- Compton Petroleum Corporation
- Application Number
- 1276857
- 1276858
- 1276859
- 1276860
- 1307759
- 1307760
- Title
- Decision 2005-060: Comptom Petroleum applications for licences to drill six critical sour natural gas wells, reduced emergency planning zone, special well spacing, and production facilities Okotoks Field (Southeast Calgary Area)
- Date
- 2005
- Title
- Decision 2005-060: Comptom Petroleum applications for licences to drill six critical sour natural gas wells, reduced emergency planning zone, special well spacing, and production facilities Okotoks Field (Southeast Calgary Area)
- Date
- 2005
- Applicant
- Compton Petroleum Corporation
- Application Number
- 1276857
- 1276858
- 1276859
- 1276860
- 1307759
- 1307760
- Hearing Panel
- Berg AJ
- Miller GJ
- Nichol JR
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Battery
- Decision D2000 20
- Drilling spacing unit
- Emergency Response Plan
- Facility licence
- Gas producing
- Guide 56
- Guide 71
- Horizontal drilling
- Horizontal well
- Hydrogen sulphide
- Natural gas
- NTS 82J
- Okotoks field
- Public interest
- Sour gas
- Target area
- Well licence
- Well spacing
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Act S79
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
- Interveners
- Munro S
- Newton J
- Baiton N
- Burditt G
- Burns West Corporation
- Burns J
- Calgary Health Region
- Lambert T
- Stefani D
- Carma Developers
- Clark RFE
- City of Calgary
- Cochrane P
- Morris W Chief
- Reinfliesch H
- Coalition of Concerned Communities
- Erin Woods Community Association
- Peace I
- Evans B
- Evans J
- Franklin S
- Friends of Medicare
- Chase H
- Front Line Residents Group
- Gecko Management Consultants
- Hemstock J
- McManus R
- RWDI West Inc.
- Dowsett I
- Springer A
- Cheung A
- Christensen M
- Pearson J
- Pincott B
- Oloman N
- Municipal District of Rocky View
- West T (Chief)
- Ollerenshaw Ranch
- Brown G
- Taylor P
- Pearson R
- Pearosn S
- Queenan M
- A.G. Soutzo
- Thimm H
- White Family
- White F
- White G
- White P
- Hindson H
- Duncan C
- Picard D
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- APPENDIX 2 SUMMARY OF CONDITIONS APPENDIX 3 SUMMARY OF DIRECTIONS APPENDIX 4 COMMITMENTS
- Location
- 10-13-022-29W4
- 04-13-022-29W4
- 06-24-022-29W4
- 04-18-022-28W4
- 12-19-022-28W4
Decision 2005-66
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4017
- Applicant
- Anadarko Canada Corporation
- Application Number
- 1351758 Application number
- 1386951 Proceeding number
- Title
- Decision 2005-066: Anadarko Canada Corporation - Section 40 review of well licence 0308210 Knopcik Field
- Date
- 2005
- Title
- Decision 2005-066: Anadarko Canada Corporation - Section 40 review of well licence 0308210 Knopcik Field
- Date
- 2005
- Applicant
- Anadarko Canada Corporation
- Application Number
- 1351758 Application number
- 1386951 Proceeding number
- Hearing Panel
- McGee TM
- Remmer WG
- Willard RJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Emergency Response Plan
- Knopcik field
- NTS 83M
- Well licence
- Legal References
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S40
- Interveners
- Rothe S
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- APPENDIX 2 SUMMARY OF COMMITMENTS COMMITMENTS BY ANADARKO
- Location
- 07-05-073-10W6
Decision 2005-71
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4021
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 1369362
- 1358995
- Title
- Decision 2005-071: Shell Canada Limited - Applications for well, facility and pipeline licences Waterton Field
- Date
- 2005
- Title
- Decision 2005-071: Shell Canada Limited - Applications for well, facility and pipeline licences Waterton Field
- Date
- 2005
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 1369362
- 1358995
- Hearing Panel
- Nichol JR
- McGee TM
- Sharp KG
- Hearing Type
- Board
- No Hearing
- Category
- Well licence
- Pipelines
- Descriptors
- Emergency Response Plan
- Facility licence
- Gas pipeline
- NTS 83O
- Pipeline licence
- Waterton field
- Well licence
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
- Pipeline Act Part 4
- Notes
- Objections withdrawn
- Hearing cancelled
- Interveners
- Sheppard D
- Sheppard J
- Barbero K
- Barbero S
- Approval
- Approved
- Location
- ##-05-020-06W2
- 02-30-006-02W5
Decision 2005-79
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4024
- Applicant
- BA Energy Inc.
- Application Number
- 1347899
- Title
- Decision 2005-079: BA Energy Inc.:Application to construct and operate an upgrader - Strathcona, Fort Saskatchewan
- Date
- 2005
- Title
- Decision 2005-079: BA Energy Inc.:Application to construct and operate an upgrader - Strathcona, Fort Saskatchewan
- Date
- 2005
- Applicant
- BA Energy Inc.
- Application Number
- 1347899
- Hearing Panel
- Berg AJ
- Houlihan RN
- Miller GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- No Hearing
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Construction permit
- Decision D2004-110
- Emergency Response Plan
- Environmental impact
- Fort Saskatchewan field
- Human factor
- NTS 83H
- Operating
- Sulphur recovery
- Oil sands oil recovery
- Upgrading
- Legal References
- Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act
- Interveners
- Northeast Strathcona County Residents
- Astotin Creek Residents' Coalition
- Government of Alberta
- Shell Canada
- Inter-Pipeline Fund
- Strathcona County Taxpayers Association
- Northwest Upgrading
- Murray J
- Veltman H
- Veltman I
- Radke J
- Radke K
- Bartlett T
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- APPENDIX 3 APPROVAL CONDITIONS This section is provided for the convenience of readers. In the event of any difference between the conditions in this section and those in the main body of the decision, the wording in the main body of the decision shall prevail. The following conditions are from Section 7 of the decision report. 1) BA Energy’s application for the use of lime addition technology as the sole means of sulphur recovery for the first phase of the Heartland upgrader is denied. 2) Primary sulphur recovery for the first phase of the Heartland upgrader will be based on Claus sulphur recovery technology, as described by BA Energy in Application No. 1347899. 3) Sulphur recovery for the Heartland upgrader will comply with the sulphur recovery requirements outlined in EUB Interim Directive (ID) 2001-3: Sulphur Recovery Guidelines for the Province of Alberta and any subsequent revisions. 4) Installation of lime addition sulphur technology as a demonstration project for the first phase of the Heartland upgrader is approved. 5) Three months prior to testing of lime addition technology, BA Energy must submit to the Board and to AENV, for their approval, any information that the Board requires and any information that AENV requires. The information that the Board requires must include, as a minimum, an operating plan that details how BA Energy will test its lime addition technology, how it will continue to meet its air emissions limits during the testing period, and how it intends to report its operating results, its air emission performance, and any other operating criteria as requested by AENV or the Board. 6) If BA Energy chooses to install lime addition technology for the first phase of its Heartland upgrader project and it can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Board and AENV its claims as outlined in Application No. 1347899, then the Board, on application by BA Energy, would be prepared to reconsider its decision on sulphur recovery for additional phases of development.
- Location
- ##-10-056-21W4
Decision 2005-85
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4029
- Applicant
- Petrofund Corp.
- Application Number
- 1365474 formerly application no.1346789
- Title
- Petrofund Corp. application for a well licence Armisie Field (West Edmonton Area)
- Date
- 2005
- Title
- Petrofund Corp. application for a well licence Armisie Field (West Edmonton Area)
- Date
- 2005
- Applicant
- Petrofund Corp.
- Application Number
- 1365474 formerly application no.1346789
- Hearing Panel
- McGee TM
- Sharp KG
- Boyler DK
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Armisie field
- Blairmore Fm
- Emergency Response Plan
- Gas producing
- Hydrogen sulphide
- NTS 83H
- Sour gas
- Well licence
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Interveners
- West Edmonton Landowners Group
- Gotaas B
- Gotaas D
- Sulyma R
- City of Edmonton
- Ainslie P
- Black B
- River Heights Group
- Hazlett A
- Singh SP
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- APPENDIX 2 SUMMARY OF COMMITMENTS AND CONDITIONS COMMITMENTS BY PETROFUND CONDITIONS
- Location
- 07-04-052-25W4
- 09-33-051-25W4
Decision 2005-104
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4054
- Applicant
- Talisman Energy Inc.
- Application Number
- 1367267
- Title
- Decision2005-104: Talisman Energy Inc. application for a well licence Sinclair Field
- Date
- 2005
- Title
- Decision2005-104: Talisman Energy Inc. application for a well licence Sinclair Field
- Date
- 2005
- Applicant
- Talisman Energy Inc.
- Application Number
- 1367267
- Hearing Panel
- McGee TM
- Waisman DD
- Remmer WG
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Emergency Response Plan
- Halfway Fm
- Hydrogen sulphide
- Natural gas
- NTS 83M
- Sinclair field
- Sour gas
- Well licence
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Interveners
- Syme M
- Syme D
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- APPENDIX 2 SUMMARY OF COMMITMENTS The Board notes throughout the decision report that Talisman Energy Inc. has undertaken to conduct certain activities in connection with its operations that are not strictly required by the EUB’s regulations or guidelines. These undertakings are described as commitments and are summarized below. It is the Board’s view that when a company makes commitments of this nature, it has satisfied itself that these activities will benefit both the project and the public, and the Board takes these commitments into account when arriving at its decision. The Board expects the applicant, having made the commitments, to fully carry out the undertaking or advise the EUB if, for whatever reasons, it cannot fulfill a commitment. The EUB would then assess whether the circumstances regarding the failed commitment warrant a review of the original approval. The Board also notes that the affected parties have the right to request a review of the original approval if commitments made by the applicant remain unfulfilled. COMMITMENTS BY TALISMAN ENERGY INC.
- Talisman commits to hold a face-to-face meeting with the Symes to conduct a detailed review of its emergency response plans if the Symes so request.
- Talisman commits to investigate the use of an incinerator to test the viability of the 14-13 well and commits to use the best means possible to meet the Alberta Ambient Air Quality Objectives (AAAQO).
- Talisman commits to no continuous flaring at the 14-13 well site.
- Talisman commits to minimize flaring and/or incineration as much as possible and not to commence any flaring and/or incineration operations at the 14-13 well site if the prevailing winds are blowing toward the Symes’ residence.
- Talisman commits to offer to relocate the Syme family to a hotel prior to any flaring and/or incineration operations at the 14-13 well site.
- Talisman commits to offer to test the Symes’ water well for both quality and quantity of water before and after drilling the 14-13 well.
- Talisman commits to consult with the 14-13 landowner and to offer to install a chain link fence around the proposed 14-13 well site if the 14-13 landowner so agrees.
- Talisman commits to install a muffler system onto the rig to reduce the noise of the rig motors during drilling operations at the 14-13 well site.
- Talisman commits to install conveyer matting on the rig catwalk to reduce the noise during tripping operations at the 14-13 well site.
- Talisman commits to minimize nighttime tripping operations at the 14-13 well as much as possible.
- Talisman commits to limit regular or scheduled traffic from accessing the 14-13 well site between 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. as much as possible during drilling operations.
- Talisman commits not to conduct cement pumping operations at the 14-13 well site between midnight and 6:00 a.m.
- Location
- 14-13-072-11W6
- 10-13-072-11W6
Decision 2006-39|2006-39 Errata
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4139
- Applicant
- Prospex Resources Ltd.
- Application Number
- 1379164
- Title
- Decision 2006-039 Prospex Resources Ltd: Application for a well licence Garrington Field (and Eratta released May 10, 2006)
- Date
- 2006
- Title
- Decision 2006-039 Prospex Resources Ltd: Application for a well licence Garrington Field (and Eratta released May 10, 2006)
- Date
- 2006
- Applicant
- Prospex Resources Ltd.
- Application Number
- 1379164
- Hearing Panel
- McGee TM
- Willard RJ
- Waisman DD
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Decision D2005-060
- DIR 056
- DIR 060
- DIR 071
- Emergency response plan
- Environmental impact assessment
- ID 2001-05
- Gas flaring
- Garrington Field
- Mannville Fm
- Site survey
- Sour gas
- Swan Hills Fm
- Well licence
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations
- Notes
- Eratta released May 10, 2006
- Interveners
- Rossall J
- Clissold R
- Connors P
- Bissett D
- Brown R
- Dabbs F
- Papanikolaou N
- Burkinshaw P
- Burkinshaw L
- Cressman J
- Robidoux R
- Freeman J
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- The Board approves the well licence at the revised surface location noted on the survey plan filed with the Board on February 16, 2006 APPENDIX 2 SUMMARY OF COMMITMENTS COMMITMENTS BY PROSPEX
- Location
- 12-04-036-04W5
- 06-04-036-04W5
Decision 2006-85
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4166
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 1398448
- Title
- Decision 2006-085: Decision on an application by Shell Canada Limited to expand the Scotford upgrader, Strathcona County, Fort Saskatchewan
- Date
- 2006
- Title
- Decision 2006-085: Decision on an application by Shell Canada Limited to expand the Scotford upgrader, Strathcona County, Fort Saskatchewan
- Date
- 2006
- Applicant
- Shell Canada Limited
- Application Number
- 1398448
- Hearing Panel
- Lock RG
- Remmer WG
- Warren WA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Industrial development permit
- Descriptors
- Air pollution
- Airborne waste
- Emergency procedure
- Emergency response plan
- Fort Saskatchewan area
- ID 2001-03
- Monitoring
- Noise (sound)
- NTS 83H
- Pollution control
- Sulphur recovery
- Legal References
- Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act S49
- Interveners
- Industrial Heartland Residents (IHR)
- Chichak D
- Chichak M
- Radke J
- Radke K
- Radke R
- Northwest Upgrading Inc.
- Synenco Energy Inc.
- Brown A
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- APPENDIX 2 COMMITMENTS BY SHELL CANADA LIMITED 1 The following commitments were made by Shell during the hearing: 1.1 Sulphur Recovery 1.2 Emergency Response Planning 1.3 Noise 1.4 Construction Traffic 1.5 Voluntary Land Purchase Program 2 The following commitments are taken from Hearing Exhibit 12, submission 45697, Shell, June 16, 2006: 2.1 Stack Top Temperature 2.2 Flaring 2.3 Leak Detection and Repair Program 2.4 Cooling Tower Emissions 2.5 Equipment Exhaust Stack Emissions 2.6 Ultra Low NOx Burners 2.7 Air Monitoring APPENDIX 3 APPROVAL CONDITIONS This section is provided for the convenience of readers. In the event of any difference between the conditions in this section and those in the main body of the decision, the wording in the main body of the decision shall prevail. 1) Shell will coordinate another track clearing exercise within six months of the approval date and will report on the performance of the exercise to the EUB and other stakeholders. 2) Shell will comply with the minimum calendar quarter-year sulphur recovery guidelines set out in ID 2001-03, Table 1, on the basis of the calendar quarter-year average sulphur content of the combined acid gas feed to the sulphur recovery processes installed at its Scotford complex inclusive of the sulphur content of acid gas that is flared.
Decision 2006-87
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4174
- Applicant
- Dominion Exploration Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 1423057
- 1423066
- 1423070
- 1423083
- 1423087
- 1423097
- 1423109
- 1423124
- Title
- Decision 2006-087: Dominion Exploration Canada Ltd. applications for well licences Pembina Field
- Date
- 2006
- Title
- Decision 2006-087: Dominion Exploration Canada Ltd. applications for well licences Pembina Field
- Date
- 2006
- Applicant
- Dominion Exploration Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 1423057
- 1423066
- 1423070
- 1423083
- 1423087
- 1423097
- 1423109
- 1423124
- Hearing Panel
- Nichol JR
- Rahnama F
- Langlo CA
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Emergency response plan
- DIR 060
- DIR 071
- Pembina Field
- NTS 83G
- Well licence
- Intervener status
- Legal References
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S26
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.02
- Interveners
- Bolianatz D
- Boxing Alberta
- McKay K
- McKay J
- Coetzee K
- Obst J
- Obst I
- Claypool L
- Claypool W
- Whitelock C
- Whitelock A
- MacIntosh R
- MacIntosh A
- Bannard GL
- Baker J
- Baker D
- Overli K
- Lovdokken J
- Pembina Agricultural Protection Association
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- APPENDIX 2 SUMMARY OF CONDITIONS. CONDITIONS 1) Dominion will confirm the resident, landowner, and transient information and any other area of the ERP that maybe subject to change and submit a revised copy of the ERP to the EUB Public Safety Group prior to the drilling of each new well. 2) The well licences and ERP will be granted for a term of two years. APPENDIX 3 SUMMARY OF COMMITMENTS COMMITMENTS BY DOMINION 1) Dominion commits to install a temporary air monitor in the vicinity of the Obst, Coetzee, and McKay properties at the commencement of sour drilling operations. 2) Dominion commits to have a rover posted during any period when the ERP is active at the junction of Highway 753 and Range Road 103 to ensure prompt notification and, if necessary evacuation of the Obsts, Mr. Coetzee, and the McKays. 3) Dominion commits to coordinate rig moves and other service and support traffic under its control so that they do not coincide with school bus operating hours. 4) Dominion commits to provide all members of the Coetzee family with cell phones during sour drilling and completion operations. 5) Dominion commits to conduct an ERP simulation exercise prior to conducting sour drilling and completion operations and to invite all parties who objected to these well applications to attend the exercise. 6) Dominion commits to revise the roles and responsibilities described in its ERP for the local authorities and regional health authorities to more accurately reflect the integrated command structure that would likely take place in the event of an emergency.
- Location
- 15-11-047-10W5
- 10-15-047-10W5
- 06-32-047-10W5
- 09-14-047-10W5
- 07-14-047-10W5
- 14-14-047-10W5
- 16-14-047-10W5
- 10-28-047-10W5
- 06-28-047-10W5
- 16-28-047-10W5
Decision 2006-110
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4184
- Applicant
- Burlington Resources Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 1448800
- 1460293
- 1460301
- Title
- Decision 2006-110 : Burlington Resources Canada Ltd. applications for three well licences, Pembina field
- Date
- 2006
- Title
- Decision 2006-110 : Burlington Resources Canada Ltd. applications for three well licences, Pembina field
- Date
- 2006
- Applicant
- Burlington Resources Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 1448800
- 1460293
- 1460301
- Hearing Panel
- Langlo CA
- Rahnama F
- Berndtsson NG
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Decision D2006-087
- Directive 071
- Emergency response plan
- EUB
- Nisku Fm
- NTS 83G
- Sour gas
- Well licence
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Interveners
- Olynyk B
- Olynyk D
- Bishop D
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- APPENDIX 2 SUMMARY OF COMMITMENTS AND CONDITIONS The Board notes that during its public consultation program and at the hearing, Burlington committed to undertake certain activities in connection with its operations that are not strictly required by the EUB’s regulations or guidelines. These undertakings are described as commitments and are summarized below. It is the Board’s view that when a company makes commitments of this nature, it has satisfied itself that these activities will benefit both the project and the public, and the Board takes these commitments into account when arriving at its decision. The Board expects the applicant, having made the commitments, to fully carry out the undertaking or advise the EUB if, for whatever reasons, it cannot fulfill a commitment. The EUB would then assess whether the circumstances regarding the failed commitment warrant a review of the original approval. The Board also notes that the affected parties also have the right to request a review of the original approval if commitments made by the applicant remain unfulfilled. The Board recognizes the Olynyks’ request to make these approvals conditional on the commitments that were made during the course of the hearing and upon Burlington providing reasonable relocation compensation for the period of their relocation. Conditions generally are requirements in addition to or otherwise expanding upon existing regulations and guidelines. The Board would like to state that matters related to compensation are outside the jurisdiction of the EUB. As such, the Board is satisfied that there is no need to condition these approvals. COMMITMENTS BY BURLINGTON
- Provide at least 72 hours’ notification to the Olynyks between the end of the sour drilling operations and the commencement of completion operations.
- Test the Olynyks’ water well before and after drilling operations.
- Ensure that the Olynyks are incorporated into the producing operator’s ERP.
- Notify the Olynyks of any workover operations.
- Ensure that the Olynyks are notified of any H2S concentration changes.
- Fulfill commitments made in letters dated June 4, 2006, June 10, 2006, and August 4, 2006, which were all submitted as part of Burlington’s submission.
- Location
- 06-06-049-08W5
Decision 2006-125
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4196
- Applicant
- Burlington Resources Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 1456689
- 1459652
- 1459666
- Title
- Decision 2006-125 : Burlington Resources Canada Ltd.: Applications for three well licences, Pembina Field
- Date
- 2006
- Title
- Decision 2006-125 : Burlington Resources Canada Ltd.: Applications for three well licences, Pembina Field
- Date
- 2006
- Applicant
- Burlington Resources Canada Ltd.
- Application Number
- 1456689
- 1459652
- 1459666
- Hearing Panel
- Nichol JR
- Langlo CA
- Boyler DK
- Hearing Type
- Board
- No Hearing
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Decision D2006-087
- Directive 071
- Emergency response plan
- EUB
- Nisku Fm
- NTS 83G
- Sour gas
- Well licence
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Interveners
- Olynyk B
- Olynyk D
- Colins P
- Johnson G
- Johnson C
- Cartwright L
- Cartwright S
- Kitching A
- The Pembina Agricultural Protection Association (PAPA)
- Donison B
- McLean S
- Guze D
- Guze S
- Titanich O
- Titanich B
- MacKenzie J
- MacKenzie L
- MacKenzie K
- Bannard GL
- Sondersen L
- Approval
- Approved
- Withdrawn
- Location
- 13-34-048-09W5
- 07-03-049-09W5
- 03-08-049-08W5
- 03-17-049-08W5
- 12-04-049-08W5
Decision 2007-111|2007-111 Errata
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4264
- Applicant
- Duvernay Oil Corp.
- Application Number
- 1500699
- 1551285
- 1529482
- Title
- Decision 2007-111: Duvernay Oil Corp. applications for well, battery, and pipeline licences Edson field (and errata)
- Date
- 2007
- Title
- Decision 2007-111: Duvernay Oil Corp. applications for well, battery, and pipeline licences Edson field (and errata)
- Date
- 2007
- Applicant
- Duvernay Oil Corp.
- Application Number
- 1500699
- 1551285
- 1529482
- Hearing Panel
- Berg AJ
- Langlo CA
- Evans RG
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Pipelines
- Descriptors
- Emergency procedure
- Emergency response plan
- Gas flaring
- Combustion
- Safety
- Compliance
- Edson field
- NTS 83F
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S7.001
- Pipeline Act Part 4
- Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
- Notes
- Errata date January 15, 2008 regarding errors in decision 2007-111 document
- Interveners
- Bugg H
- Bugg J
- Bullock C
- Holroyd D
- Holroyd M
- Smith K
- Makowecki F
- Thompson C
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- APPENDIX 2 SUMMARY OF CONDITIONS APPENDIX 3 SUMMARY OF COMMITMENTS Drilling, completion, and well testing ERP's
- Location
- 08-13-054-19W5
- 06-34-053-19W5
- 04-11-053-18W5
- 02-13-054-19W5
Decision 2008-18
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4278
- Applicant
- Highpine Oil & Gas Limited
- Application Number
- 1480869
- 1486164
- Title
- Decision 2008-018: Highpine Oil & Gas Limited applications for well licences Pembina field
- Date
- 2008
- Title
- Decision 2008-018: Highpine Oil & Gas Limited applications for well licences Pembina field
- Date
- 2008
- Applicant
- Highpine Oil & Gas Limited
- Application Number
- 1480869
- 1486164
- Hearing Panel
- Sharp KG
- Boyler DK
- Gilmour JG
- Hearing Type
- Board
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Hydrogen sulphide
- Safety
- Hazard
- Risk
- Emergency response plan
- Noise reduction
- Environmental impact
- Sour gas
- Pembina field
- NTS 83G
- Well licence
- Nisku FM
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- Energy Resources Conservation Act S3
- Administrative Procedures and Jurisdiction Act
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S12.150
- EUB Rules of Practice
- Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
- Personal Information Protection Act
- Interveners
- Rocky Rapids Concerned Citizens
- Kessler D.
- Mulroy D.
- Sullivan D.
- Coombs N.
- CoombsJ.
- Mueller M.
- MacKenzie K.
- Dupperon L.
- Kelly S.
- Domke B.
- McGinn L.
- Ochsner M.
- Schmidt D.
- Dodd C.
- Du S.
- McCutcheon D.
- Approval
- Approved with conditions
- Conditions
- APPENDIX 2 SUMMARY OF COMMITMENTS The Board notes throughout the decision report that Highpine has undertaken to conduct certain activities in connection with its operations that are not strictly required by the EUB’s regulations or guidelines. These undertakings are described as commitments and are summarized below. It is the Board’s view that when a company makes commitments of this nature, it has satisfied itself that these activities will benefit both the project and the public, and the Board takes these commitments into account when arriving at its decision. The Board expects the applicant, having made the commitments, to fully carry out the undertaking or advise the EUB if, for whatever reasons, it cannot fulfill a commitment. The EUB would then assess whether the circumstances regarding the failed commitment warrant a review of the original approval. The Board also notes that the affected parties have the right to request a review of the original approval if commitments made by the applicant remain unfulfilled. COMMITMENTS BY HIGHPINE
- Highpine will not flare more than eight hours in total for each well.
- Highpine will maintain roads in the EPZs to ensure that they remain passable during critical sour operations.
- Highpine will suspend operations if any roads inside the EPZs are unable to be made passable.
- Highpine will lead one full-scale emergency response exercise every year.
- Highpine will update its ERPs, including updating all resident information, and submit those updates to the EUB for review.
- Highpine will ignite an uncontrolled release within 15 minutes of sour gas reaching surface.
- Location
- 16-14-050-07W5
- 14-18-050-06W5
- 16-13-050-07W5
- 11-14-050-08W5
- 00-00-048-08W5
- 00-00-049-09W5
- 13-02-050-06W5
Decision 2008-24
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4280
- Applicant
- Petro-Canada Oil Sands Inc.
- Application Number
- 1490956
- Title
- Decision 2008-024: Petro-Canada Oil Sands Inc. application to construct and operate the Sturgeon upgrader Sturgeon County
- Date
- 2008
- Title
- Decision 2008-024: Petro-Canada Oil Sands Inc. application to construct and operate the Sturgeon upgrader Sturgeon County
- Date
- 2008
- Applicant
- Petro-Canada Oil Sands Inc.
- Application Number
- 1490956
- Hearing Panel
- Dilay JD
- Miller GJ
- McManus BT
- Hearing Type
- Prehearing
- Category
- Oil sands
- Descriptors
- Environmental impact
- Groundwater
- Surface water
- Air quality
- Soil
- Vegetation
- Wildlife
- Noise reduction
- Health
- Safety
- Emergency response plan
- Economic analysis
- Socio-economic effect
- Sturgeon County
- Upgrading
- Oil sands
- Legal References
- Oil Sands Conservation Act S11
- Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act
- Water Act S36
- Water Act S37
- Water Act S49
- Water Act S50
- Interveners
- Alexander First Nations Industrial Relations Corporation (AFN IRC)
- Northeast Sturgeon County Industrial Landowners (NESCIL) and the Citizens for Responsible Development (CFRD)
- Shaw S
- Shaw K
- Statoil Hydro Canada
- Norh West Upgrading
- Suncor Energy Inc.
- S.V. Farms, S.V. Half Diamond Ranch, 267554 Alberta Ltd., and the J.Smulski Estate
- Hoehn R
- Total E&P Canada Ltd.
- Wright A
- Approval
- No approval required
- Location
- 00-19-056-21W4
- 00-02-056-21W4
- 00-03-056-21W4
- 00-10-056-21W4
- 00-11-056-21W4
- 00-12-056-21W4
- 00-13-056-21W4
- 00-14-056-21W4
- 00-15-056-21W4
- 00-22-056-21W4
- 00-23-056-21W4
- 00-24-056-21W4
- 00-25-056-21W4
- 00-26-056-21W4
- 00-27-056-21W4
Decision 2008-30
https://had.aer.ca/link/decision4286
- Applicant
- Highpine Energy Ltd.
- Application Number
- 1520743
- 1521616
- Title
- Decision 2008-030: Highpine Energy Ltd. and Highpine Oil & Gas Limited applications for two well licences Tomahawk field (and Errata)
- Date
- 2008
- Title
- Decision 2008-030: Highpine Energy Ltd. and Highpine Oil & Gas Limited applications for two well licences Tomahawk field (and Errata)
- Date
- 2008
- Applicant
- Highpine Energy Ltd.
- Application Number
- 1520743
- 1521616
- Hearing Panel
- Miller GJ
- Hearing Type
- Board
- No Hearing
- Category
- Well licence
- Descriptors
- Safety
- Health
- Emergency response plan
- Environmental impact
- Land value
- Risk
- Tomahawk field
- NTS 83G
- Well licence
- Legal References
- Oil and Gas Conservation Regulations S2.020
- ERCB Rules of Practice S21
- Notes
- includes Errata dated May 6, 2008
- Interveners
- area landowners
- Approval
- Withdrawn
- Location
- 08-25-051-06W5
- 04-30-051-05W5
- 03-18-051-06W5